SCIENCE IN DIMINISHING CASUALTIES AT SEA.

At the recent meeting of the British Association, Don Arturo de

Marcoartu read a paper on the above subject.

He stated that he wished to draw special attention to increasing the

safety of navigation against storms, fogs, fire, and collisions with

wrecks, icebergs, or vessels, and recommending the development of

maritime telegraphy. He urged that vessels should be supplied with

apparatus to communicate with and telegraph to each other and to the

nearest coast the weather and sea passed over by them, and that reports

given by vessels should be used as "warnings" more extensively. He

wished the mid-Atlantic stations connected by telegraph for the same

purpose.

In regard to the use of oil on rough seas, he said that Dr. Badeley in

1857, Mr. John Shields five years ago at Peterhead and last year at

Folkestone, the Board of Trade in 1883, and a committee on life saving

appliances of the United States had made experiments. The conclusions of

the committee were that in deep water oil had a calming effect upon a

rough sea, but there was nothing in either source of information which

yet answered the question whether or not there is in the force exerted

by the wind a point beyond which oil cannot counteract its influence in

causing the sea to break. He thought it appeared that oil had some

utility on tidal bars; on wrecks, to facilitate the operations of

rescue; on lifeboats and on lifebuoys. In regard to icebergs, he thought

the possibility of obtaining an echo from an iceberg when in dangerous

proximity to a ship should be tried. He advocated the use of automatic

sprinklers in the case of fire, the establishment of parabolic

reflectors for concentration of sound, and the further prosecution of

experiments by Professor Bell in establishing communication between

vessels some distance apart by means of interrupted electrical currents.

The improvement of navigation, he said, meant an international code of

police to improve police rules of navigation; an international code of

universal telegraphy for navigation; an international office of

meteorology and navigation to collect the studies; experiments on the

weather, on the sea, on the casualties; and the discovery by experiment

of new apparatus and appliances to diminish maritime disaster.

He had called the attention of two governments to this matter, and he

hoped that before long there would be proposed an international

congress--such as the postal, telegraph, and sanitary congresses, and

the international convention to fix the common meridian--by one of the

maritime powers, by which would be founded an international institution

to diminish casualties at sea. He recommended a universal system of

buoys. The great losses of life and property every year were worthy the

devotion of £300,000 by an international institution, which would be

much less than the monthly average loss in navigation.

Admiral Pim said that ships were improperly built--some were ten times

longer than their beam. There was nothing in the world so ticklish as a

ship; touch her in the waist, and down she goes. He believed sailing

ships ought not to exceed four times their beam, and steamers certainly

not more than six times. He pointed out that a fruitful cause of

accidents was the stopping of steaming all at once in the case of

impending collision, by which the rudder lost control of the vessel. If

constructors looked more to the form of the ships, and got them to steer

better, collisions would be avoided.

The Lord Advocate said it had always occurred to him that one great

secret of collisions at sea was the present system of lights, which made

it impossible for the vessel at once to inform another vessel what it

was about. The method of signaling was very crude, and he ventured to

say that it was quite out of date when vessels met each other at a rate

of speed of 24 to 25 knots. He had, as an amateur, tried a method which

he would attempt to explain. His idea was to fit up a lantern on deck,

showing an electric light. The instrument would be controlled by the

rudder, and the commanding officer of the vessel would be able so to

turn it when the helm was put up or down that the light would flash at

some distance in front of either bow of the vessel, and thus be a signal

to a vessel coming in an opposite direction. When the helm was

amidships, the light was shown straight ahead, and could not be moved

until the helm was shifted. The direction in which the vessel was going

could not by any possibility be mistaken, and it was plain that if the

lights from two ships crossed each other, then there was danger. If the

lights were clear of each other, then the ships would pass safely.

Sir James Douglass asked if his Lordship had made any experiments.

The Lord Advocate said he had not. The Board of Trade had such a number

of inventions on this subject on hand that he supposed they were already

disgusted. Besides, he was only an amateur, and left the carrying out of

the suggestion to others.

Sir James Douglass said this idea of a lantern did very well for a short

distance, but for a long distance it utterly failed. It was very

difficult to realize a movement from a distance of over a mile out to

sea, and signals were required to be visible for from two to three

miles.

The Lord Advocate said his idea depended not upon the object light, but

upon the sweep of the light on the water.

Sir James Douglass said all those questions were of the utmost

importance to a maritime country. In regard to experiments with oil on

troubled water, he had witnessed them, and he had carefully studied all

the reports, and had come to the conclusion that they were all very well

in a tub of water or a pond, but on the ocean they were utterly

hopeless. He would stake his reputation on that. They had been tried in

the neighborhood of Aberdeen, and he had prophesied the results before

they were commenced. It was utterly hopeless to think that a quantity of

oil had the power of laying a storm--all the world could not produce oil

enough to bring about that result.

There might be something in maritime telegraphy, and he hoped the

experiments of Mr. Graham Bell, in transmitting through two or three

mile distances, would come to something. He did not believe in powerful

lights. Increase the lights to any very great extent, and a dazzling

effect was the result. In regard to sound, he wondered that no more

effective alarm was used than the whistle. It was well known that, as

the whistle instrument was enlarged, the sound became more and more a

roar. He would have ships use all their boiler power in sounding a

siren, so that the sound could be heard at a distance of not less than

two or three miles in any weather. With such a signal as that there

ought to be, not absolute safety, but collisions would be more easily

prevented. He was glad to say that a universal system of buoys had been

practically arranged, thanks to the Duke of Edinburgh and his committee,

so that, as soon as an old system can be changed to a new one, all the

buoys would bear one universal language.

Admiral Pim pointed out that a red light would show four miles, while a

green light was only visible for two miles and a half, so that, if a

green light were seen, it indicated that the two vessels were within two

miles and a half of each other.

Sir James Douglass said there was undoubtedly a weakness in regard to

these lights; and he held that in the manufacture of lights effect

should be given to the difference that existed in the various lights, so

that, by making the green light more powerful, it could penetrate as far

as the red, and in the same way making the red and green lights

proportionately more powerful, so that they would penetrate as far as

the white light.

Sir James Douglass said he had seen a parabolic reflector for sound

tried, but, unfortunately, the reflector so intensified and focused all

the sounds about the vessel and the noise of the sea that the operator

could hear nothing but a chaos of sound.

* * * * *

Scientific American Supplement, No. 514, November 7, 1885 · 第 24 / 68 题