Figures 11-12

General tone of upper parts dark tawny; size medium; braincase

narrowed.

Baculum of _E. r. ruficaudus_: Shaft thick; keel proportionally low, 1/4

of length of tip; tip 31 to 33 per cent of length of shaft; angle

formed by tip and shaft 120 deg.; distal 2/5 of shaft slightly compressed

laterally; base slightly widened; shaft long, 4.09 to 4.56 mm.

Differs from _E. r. simulans_, in keel proportionally lower, tip

proportionally shorter, distal 1/5 of shaft less laterally compressed,

shaft usually longer; from _E. cinereicollis_, in angle formed by tip

and shaft smaller, shaft shorter, ridges on either side of tip distinct;

from _E. quadrimaculatus_, in tip proportionally longer, shaft usually

shorter; from _E. speciosus_, _E. panamintinus_, _E. umbrinus_, _E.

palmeri_, and _E. bulleri_, in base not markedly widened, shaft longer,

angle formed by tip and shaft larger.

For comparisons with _E. alpinus_, _E. minimus_, _E. townsendii_, _E.

sonomae_, _E. amoenus_, _E. dorsalis_, _E. merriami_, and _E.

quadrivittatus_, see the accounts of those species.

Baculum of _E. r. simulans_: Shaft thick; keel proportionally low, 2/5

of length of tip; tip 40 to 48 per cent of length of shaft; angle formed

by tip and shaft 130 deg.; distal 2/5 of shaft laterally compressed; base

slightly wider than shaft; shaft medium to long, 3.30 to 4.26 mm.

Differs from _E. cinereicollis_ in, keel proportionally higher, shaft

shorter, tip proportionally longer, angle formed by tip and shaft

smaller, distal 2/5 of shaft more laterally compressed; from _E.

quadrimaculatus_ in, keel proportionally higher, angle formed by tip and

shaft larger, tip proportionally longer, distal 2/5 of shaft more

laterally compressed, shaft shorter; from _E. speciosus_, _E.

panamintinus_, _E. umbrinus_, _E. palmeri_, and _E. bulleri_, in base

not markedly widened, shaft usually longer.

For comparisons with _E. alpinus_, _E. minimus_, _E. townsendii_, _E.

sonomae_, _E. amoenus_, _E. dorsalis_, _E. merriami_, and _E.

quadrivittatus_, see the accounts of those species.

The differences between the bacula of the subspecies _Eutamias

ruficaudus ruficaudus_ and _E. r. simulans_ are comparable to those

usually found between species of chipmunks. Consequently, I suspect that

_E. r. simulans_ and _E. r. ruficaudus_ are specifically distinct and

suggest that a search would be worth while for specimens in the

geographic area between the geographic ranges as now known for the two

kinds to ascertain whether intergradation (the criterion of subspecies)

occurs. I suppose there is no intergradation but in the absence of

precise information, I choose not to modify the current taxonomic

arrangement of _E. r. ruficaudus_ and _E. r. simulans_.

_Specimens examined_: 17.

_E. ruficaudus ruficaudus_: Montana: _Flathead Co._: 1 mi. W and

2 mi. S Summit, 5,000 ft., 2. _Ravalli Co._: Big Hole Hill,

6,000 ft., 2; Big Hole Hill, 6,600 ft., 1; Continental Divide,

Big Hole Hill, 7,000 ft., 1.

_E. r. simulans_: Idaho: _Bonner Co._: Priest Lake, 1 (BS).

_Kootenai Co._: 13 mi. E and 5 mi. N Coeur d'Alene, 3. _Shoshone

Co._: Mullan, 1 (BS). _Clearwater Co._: 25 mi. E and 16 mi. N

Pierce, 6.

#Eutamias cinereicollis# (J. A. Allen)

The Baculum in the Chipmunks of Western North America · 第 31 / 44 题