TO SIR HORACE MANN.

STRAWBERRY HILL, _April_ 30, 1763.

The papers have told you all the formal changes; the real one consists

solely in Lord Bute being out of office, for, having recovered his

fright, he is still as much Minister as ever, and consequently does not

find his unpopularity decrease. On the contrary, I think his situation

more dangerous than ever: he has done enough to terrify his friends,

and encourage his enemies, and has acquired no new strength; rather has

lost strength, by the disappearance of Mr. Fox from the scene. His

deputies, too, will not long care to stand all the risk for him, when

they perceive, as they must already, that they have neither credit nor

confidence. Indeed the new administration is a general joke, and will

scarce want a violent death to put an end to it. Lord Bute is very

blamable for embarking the King so deep in measures that may have so

serious a termination. The longer the Court can stand its ground, the

more firmly will the opposition be united, and the more inflamed. I have

ever thought this would be a turbulent reign, and nothing has happened

to make me alter my opinion.

Mr. Fox's exit has been very unpleasant. He would not venture to accept

the Treasury, which Lord Bute would have bequeathed to him; and could

not obtain an earldom, for which he thought he had stipulated; but some

of the negotiators asserting that he had engaged to resign the

Paymaster's place, which he vehemently denies, he has been forced to

take up with a barony, and has broken with his associates--I do not say

friends, for with the chief of _them_[1] he had quarrelled when he

embarked in the new system. He meets with little pity, and yet has found

as much ingratitude as he had had power of doing service.

[Footnote 1: "_The chief of them._" Walpole himself explains in a note

that he means the Dukes of Cumberland and Devonshire.]

I am glad you are going to have a great duke; it will amuse you, and a

new Court will make Florence lively, the only beauty it wants. You

divert me with my friend the Duke of Modena's conscientious match: if

the Duchess had outlived him, she would not have been so scrupulous.

But, for Hymen's sake, who is that Madame Simonetti? I trust, not that

old painted, gaming, debauched Countess from Milan, whom I saw at the

fair of Reggio!

I surprise myself with being able to write two pages of pure English; I

do nothing but deal in broken French. The two nations are crossing over

and figuring-in. We have had a Count d'Usson and his wife these six

weeks; and last Saturday arrived a Madame de Boufflers, _sçavante,

galante_, a great friend of the Prince of Conti, and a passionate

admirer _de nous autres Anglois_. I am forced to live much with _tout

ça_, as they are perpetually at my Lady Hervey's; and as my Lord

Hertford goes ambassador to Paris, where I shall certainly make him a

visit next year--don't you think I shall be computing how far it is to

Florence? There is coming, too, a Marquis de Fleury,[1] who is to be

consigned to me, as a political relation, _vû l'amitié entre le Cardinal

son oncle et feu monsieur mon père_. However, as my cousin Fleury is not

above six-and-twenty, I had much rather be excused from such a

commission as showing the Tombs and the Lions, and the King and Queen,

and my Lord Bute, and the Waxwork, to a boy. All this breaks in upon my

plan of withdrawing by little and little from the world, for I hate to

tire it with an old lean face, and which promises to be an old lean face

for thirty years longer, for I am as well again as ever. The Duc de

Nivernois called here the other day in his way from Hampton Court; but,

as the most sensible French never have eyes to see anything, unless they

see it every day and see it in fashion, I cannot say he flattered me

much, or was much struck with Strawberry. When I carried him into the

Cabinet, which I have told you is formed upon the idea of a Catholic

chapel, he pulled off his hat, but perceiving his error, he said, "_Ce

n'est pas une chapelle pourtant_," and seemed a little displeased.

[Footnote 1: Cardinal Fleury, Prime Minister of France from 1727 to

1742. Pope celebrated his love of peace--

Peace is my dear delight, not Fleury's more;

and by his resolute maintenance of peace during the first seven years of

his administration he had so revived the resources and restored the

power of his country, that when the question of going to war with France

was discussed in the Council of Vienna the veteran Prince Eugene warned

the Ministers that his wise and prudent administration had been so

beneficial to his country that the Empire was no longer a match for it.]

My poor niece [Lady Waldegrave] does not forget her Lord, though by this

time I suppose the world has. She has taken a house here, at Twickenham,

to be near me. Madame de Boufflers has heard so much of her beauty, that

she told me she should be glad to peep through a grate anywhere to get a

glimpse of her,--but at present it would not answer. I never saw so

great an alteration in so short a period; but she is too young not to

recover her beauty, only dimmed by grief that must be temporary. Adieu!

my dear Sir.

_Monday, May 2nd_, ARLINGTON STREET.

The plot thickens: Mr. Wilkes is sent to the Tower for the last _North

Briton_;[1] a paper whose fame must have reached you. It said Lord Bute

had made the King utter a gross falsehood in his last speech. This hero

is as bad a fellow as ever hero was, abominable in private life, dull in

Parliament, but, they say, very entertaining in a room, and certainly no

bad writer, besides having had the honour of contributing a great deal

to Lord Bute's fall. Wilkes fought Lord Talbot in the autumn, whom he

had abused; and lately in Calais, when the Prince de Croy, the Governor,

asked how far the liberty of the press extended in England, replied, I

cannot tell, but I am trying to know. I don't believe this will be the

only paragraph I shall send you on this affair.

[Footnote 1: The celebrated No. 45 which attacked the speech with which

the King had opened Parliament; asserting that it was the speech not of

the King, but of the Ministers; and that as such he had a right to

criticise it, and to denounce its panegyric of the late speech as

founded on falsehood.]

_A PARTY AT "STRABERRI"--WORK OF HIS PRINTING PRESS--EPIGRAMS--A GARDEN

PARTY AT ESHER._

Letters of Horace Walpole — Volume I · 第 123 / 143 题