TO THE HON. H.S. CONWAY.

ARLINGTON STREET, _Aug._ 14, 1759.

I am here in the most unpleasant way in the world, attending poor Mrs.

Leneve's death-bed, a spectator of all the horrors of tedious suffering

and clear sense, and with no one soul to speak to--but I will not tire

you with a description of what has quite worn me out.

Probably by this time you have seen the Duke of Richmond or Fitzroy--but

lest you should not, I will tell you all I can learn, and a wonderful

history it is. Admiral Byng was not more unpopular than Lord George

Sackville.[1] I should scruple repeating his story if Betty and the

waiters at Arthur's did not talk of it publicly, and thrust Prince

Ferdinand's orders into one's hand.

[Footnote 1: Lord George was brought to court-martial for disobedience

of orders, and most deservedly cashiered--a sentence which was, not very

becomingly, oveilooked some years afterwards, when, having changed his

name to Germaine on succeeding to a large fortune, and having become a

member of the House of Commons, he was made a Secretary of State by Lord

North.]

You have heard, I suppose, of the violent animosities that have reigned

for the whole campaign between him and Lord Granby--in which some other

warm persons have been very warm too. In the heat of the battle, the

Prince, finding thirty-six squadrons of French coming down upon our

army, sent Ligonier to order our thirty-two squadrons, under Lord

George, to advance. During that transaction, the French appeared to

waver; and Prince Ferdinand, willing, as it is supposed, to give the

honour to the British horse of terminating the day, sent Fitzroy to bid

Lord George bring up only the British cavalry. Ligonier had but just

delivered his message, when Fitzroy came with his.--Lord George said,

"This can't be so--would he have me break the line? here is some

mistake." Fitzroy replied, he had not argued upon the orders, but those

were the orders. "Well!" said Lord George, "but I want a guide." Fitzroy

said, he would be his guide. Lord George, "Where is the Prince?"

Fitzroy, "I left him at the head of the left wing, I don't know where he

is now." Lord George said he would go seek him, and have this explained.

Smith then asked Fitzroy to repeat the orders to him; which being done,

Smith went and whispered Lord George, who says he then bid Smith carry

up the cavalry. Smith is come, and says he is ready to answer anybody

any question. Lord George says, Prince Ferdinand's behaviour to him has

been most infamous, has asked leave to resign his command, and to come

over, which is granted. Prince Ferdinand's behaviour is summed up in the

enclosed extraordinary paper: which you will doubt as I did, but which

is certainly genuine. I doubted, because, in the military, I thought

direct disobedience of orders was punished with an immediate arrest, and

because the last paragraph seemed to me very foolish. The going out of

the way to compliment Lord Granby with what he would have done, seems to

take off a little from the compliments paid to those that have done

something; but, in short, Prince Ferdinand or Lord George, one of them,

is most outrageously in the wrong, and the latter has much the least

chance of being thought in the right.

The particulars I tell you, I collected from the most _accurate_

authorities.--I make no comments on Lord George, it would look like a

little dirty court to you; and the best compliment I can make you, is to

think, as I do, that you will be the last man to enjoy this revenge.

You will be sorry for poor M'Kinsey and Lady Betty, who have lost their

only child at Turin. Adieu!

_ADMIRAL BOSCAWEN'S VICTORY--DEFEAT OF THE KING OF PRUSSIA--LORD G.

SACKVILLE._

Letters of Horace Walpole — Volume I · 第 95 / 143 题