TO THE HON. H.S. CONWAY.

STRAWBERRY HILL, _Aug._ 29, 1748.

Dear Harry,--Whatever you may think, a campaign at Twickenham furnishes

as little matter for a letter as an abortive one in Flanders. I can't

say indeed that my generals wear black wigs, but they have long

full-bottomed hoods which cover as little entertainment to the full.

[Illustration: STRAWBERRY HILL, FROM THE SOUTH EAST.]

There's General my Lady Castlecomer, and General my Lady Dowager Ferris!

Why, do you think I can extract more out of them than you can out of

Hawley or Honeywood? Your old women dress, go to the Duke's levée, see

that the soldiers cock their hats right, sleep after dinner, and soak

with their led-captains till bed-time, and tell a thousand lies of what

they never did in their youth. Change hats for head-clothes, the rounds

for visits, and led-captains for toad-eaters, and the life is the very

same. In short, these are the people I live in the midst of, though not

with; and it is for want of more important histories that I have wrote

to you seldom; not, I give you my word, from the least negligence. My

present and sole occupation is planting, in which I have made great

progress and talked very learnedly with the nurserymen, except that now

and then a lettuce run to seed overturns all my botany, as I have more

than once taken it for a curious West Indian flowering shrub. Then the

deliberation with which trees grow, is extremely inconvenient to my

natural impatience. I lament living in so barbarous an age, when we are

come to so little perfection in gardening. I am persuaded that a hundred

and fifty years hence it will be as common to remove oaks a hundred and

fifty years old, as it is now to transplant tulip roots.[1] I have even

begun a treatise or panegyric on the great discoveries made by posterity

in all arts and sciences, wherein I shall particularly descant on the

great and cheap convenience of making trout-rivers--one of the

improvements which Mrs. Kerwood wondered Mr. Hedges would not make at

his country-house, but which was not then quite so common as it will be.

I shall talk of a secret for roasting a wild boar and a whole pack of

hounds alive, without hurting them, so that the whole chase may be

brought up to table; and for this secret, the Duke of Newcastle's

grandson, if he can ever get a son, is to give a hundred thousand

pounds. Then the delightfulness of having whole groves of humming-birds,

tame tigers taught to fetch and carry, pocket spying-glasses to see

all that is doing in China, with a thousand other toys, which we now

look upon as impracticable, and which pert posterity would laugh in

one's face for staring at, while they are offering rewards for

perfecting discoveries, of the principles of which we have not the least

conception! If ever this book should come forth, I must expect to have

all the learned in arms against me, who measure all knowledge backward:

some of them have discovered symptoms of all arts in Homer; and

Pineda,[2] had so much faith in the accomplishments of his ancestors,

that he believed Adam understood all sciences but politics. But as these

great champions for our forefathers are dead, and Boileau not alive to

hitch me into a verse with Perrault, I am determined to admire the

learning of posterity, especially being convinced that half our present

knowledge sprung from discovering the errors of what had formerly been

called so. I don't think I shall ever make any great discoveries myself,

and therefore shall be content to propose them to my descendants, like

my Lord Bacon,[3] who, as Dr. Shaw says very prettily in his preface to

Boyle, "had the art of inventing arts:" or rather like a Marquis of

Worcester, of whom I have seen a little book which he calls "A Century

of Inventions,"[4] where he has set down a hundred machines to do

impossibilities with, and not a single direction how to make the

machines themselves.

[Footnote 1: It is worth noting that these predictions that "it will be

common to remove oaks a hundred and fifty years old" has been verified

many years since; at least, if not in the case of oaks, in that of large

elms and ashtrees. In 1850 Mr. Paxton offered to a Committee of the

House of Commons to undertake to remove the large elm which was standing

on the ground proposed for the Crystal Palace of the Exhibition of 1851,

and his master, the Duke of Devonshire, has since that time removed many

trees of very large size from one part of his grounds to another; and

similarly the "making of trout rivers" has been carried out in many

places, even in our most distant colonies, by Mr. Buckland's method of

raising the young fish from roe in boxes and distributing them in places

where they were needed.]

[Footnote 2: Pineda was a Spanish Jesuit of the seventeenth century, and

a voluminous writer.]

[Footnote 3: It is a singular thing that this most eminent man should be

so constantly spoken of by a title which he never had. His first title

in the peerage was Baron Verulam; his second, on a subsequent promotion,

was Viscount St. Albans; yet the error is as old as Dryden, and is

defended by Lord Macaulay in a sentence of pre-eminent absurdity:

"Posterity has felt that the greatest of English philosophers could

derive no accession of dignity from any title which power could bestow,

and, in defiance of letters-patent, has obstinately refused to degrade

Francis Bacon into Viscount St. Albans." But, without stopping to

discuss the propriety of representing a Britiph peerage, honestly

earned, and, in his case as Lord Chancellor, necessarily conferred, as a

"degradation," the mistake made is not that of continuing to call him

Francis Bacon, a name by which at one time he was known, but that of

calling him "Lord Bacon," a title by which he was never known for a

single moment in his lifetime; while, if a great philosopher was really

"degraded" by a peerage, it is hard to see how the degradation would

have been lessened by the title being Lord Bacon, which it was not,

rather than Viscount St. Albans, which it was.]

[Footnote 4: The "Biographie Universelle" (art. _Newcomen_) says of the

Marquis: "Longtemps avant lui [Neucomen] on avait remarqué la grande

force expansive de la vapeur, et on avait imaginé de l'employer comme

puissance. On trouve déja cetté application proposée et même executée

dans un ouvrage publié en 1663, par le Marquis de Worcester, sous le

titre bizarre, 'A Century of Inventions.'"]

If I happen to be less punctual in my correspondence than I intend to

be, you must conclude I am writing my book, which being designed for a

panegyric, will cost me a great deal of trouble. The dedication with

your leave, shall be addressed to your son that is coming, or, with Lady

Ailesbury's leave, to your ninth son, who will be unborn nearer to the

time I am writing of; always provided that she does not bring three at

once, like my Lady Berkeley.

Well! I have here set you the example of writing nonsense when one has

nothing to say, and shall take it ill if you don't keep up the

correspondence on the same foot. Adieu!

_REJOICINGS FOR THE PEACE--MASQUERADE AT RANELAGH--MEETING OF THE

PRINCES PARTY AND THE JACOBITES--PREVALENCE OF DRINKING AND

GAMBLING--WHITEFIELD._

Letters of Horace Walpole — Volume I · 第 75 / 143 题