Charcot claims that a restitution of anatomical continuity, and

therefore of physiological potentiality, may occur in a myelitic

cicatrix. But the experiments of Kahler[92] and Homén[93] prove that

when a nerve-tract {816} is once destroyed within the spinal cord all

hope of restoring that tract in structure, and thus to restore its

functions, is at an end. Unlike the fibres of the peripheral nerves,

those of the spinal cord and brain do not seem capable of

regeneration.[94] If a restoration of function is to occur at all, it

must occur through other channels than those destroyed—in other words,

by vicarious action.

[Footnote 92: _Prager medizinische Wochenschrift_, 1884, No. 31.]

[Footnote 93: _Contribution expérimentale à la Pathologie et à

l'Anatomie pathologique de la moelle épinière_, Helsingfors, 1885,

abstracted in _Centralblatt für die medizinisches Wochenschriften_,

1886, No. 16.]

[Footnote 94: According to the first observer, this is probably due to

structural differences. The extramedullary fibres have a sheath and

annular constrictions which are absent in the intramedullary.]

In a large number of cases myelitis is a limited affection; that is,

its ravages remain confined to the area originally involved. But

occasionally the morbid process involves the next segments above or

below, extending with specially great rapidity through the anterior

gray horns. Exceptionally, the entire cord may thus become the site of

a generalized myelitis. There is one segment of the cord which may be

regarded as possessing an acquired vulnerability when a myelitic focus

is in its neighborhood, and that is the lower end. It seems that while

the results of a transverse myelitis in the middle dorsal cord may

remain stationary for ten or more years, those of a transverse

myelitis at the upper lumbar level do not; on the contrary, the entire

cord below the lesion appears to be doomed to undergo the same

degeneration by contiguity. This is the only occurrence which seems to

deserve the name of a descending myelitis: an ascending extension is

more frequently noted in other parts of the cord, but the frequency of

both the so-called ascending and descending types has been unduly

magnified by the inclusion of the secondary degenerations, which are

constant sequelæ of all complete destructive transverse lesions of the

cord, but which are rather passive phenomena, and probably influence

the clinical progress of the case but little, except under such

conditions as are potent in that chronic form of myelitis which

underlies tabes dorsalis.

CLINICAL HISTORY.—The symptoms of acute myelitis usually correspond to

those of any more or less completely transverse lesion of the cord,

and accordingly vary with the altitude of the upper level of the

lesion. In a general way, they may be stated as consisting of—

First, paralysis of movement in the parts supplied from the nerves

given off below the level of the lesion. The reason for this can be

easily recognized in those cases where the pyramid tract, which

conveys voluntary impulses centrifugally, is interrupted by the

softening.

Second, paralysis of sensation in the parts supplied by the same

nerves. This is equally explained by the pathological interruption of

the centripetal impressions normally conveyed brainward.

Third, alterations in the nutrition of the parts supplied by the

nerves arising in the affected level.

Fourth, abolition of those reflexes which are translated in the level

of the lesion.

Speaking crudely, then, the symptoms of a transverse myelitis fall

into two natural groups. The one which includes the first and second

categories enumerated are symptoms due to interruption of cerebral

functions; the other, which comprises the last two categories, being

due to abolition or perversion of spinal functions. There is a third

group comprising certain constitutional symptoms.

{817} Aside from those variations due to the distribution, extent, and

intensity of the lesion there are others which depend on the rapidity

of its invasion. There are three types in this respect—the

apoplectiform, the ordinary acute, and the subacute. The term

apoplectiform has been used in two different senses, one being

clinical, and referring to the rapidity of onset of the symptoms; the

other anatomical, and referring to the nature of the lesion. It is,

however, doubtful if a distinction in the latter sense is practically

valuable. The presence of a blood-clot in a myelitic focus is itself

secondary to the softening, and the intensity and rapidity of the

process must have shown itself in the development of the latter.[95]

The term ought, therefore, to be used in a clinical sense only.

[Footnote 95: I am able to recall but a single case in which, even

clinically speaking, a primary hemorrhage into the cord-substance was

plausible. In this instance a sudden arrest of menstruation had

occurred nearly simultaneously with a combined strain and exposure in

a young girl.]

The constitutional symptoms of acute myelitis—which, however, are

often absent—are its most distinctive features in one sense. Disorders

of motion and sensation and perversions of nutrition are signs common

to all destructive affections of the cord, whether of a traumatic,

neoplastic, or a chronic inflammatory character. But fever, headache,

and delirium,[96] associated with gastric and visceral disturbances of

acute development, are not found to be initial and intrinsic symptoms

with them as with acute myelitis. In their absence the mode of onset

is characteristic. A high degree of paralysis, motor or sensory, is

developed with a rapidity unequalled in any chronic affection of the

cord. Sometimes there is a prodromal period in which formication,

numbness, and disorders of movement are observed in the same part of

the body which are destined to become paralyzed at a later stage of

the malady. Within a few hours, days, or at most weeks, complete

paraplegia may become developed. The prodromal symptoms may include

any form of disturbed sensation. Lancinating pains, tingling, a

feeling of the limbs falling asleep, peculiar and indescribable

sensations attending the acts of micturition and defecation or of

placing the feet violently on the ground, are common. Occasionally

they are found in one limb only, although motor and sensory paralysis

may ultimately occupy the symmetrical member as completely as the one

first involved. In some cases it has been noted that the patient is

unable to lie down, or, if lying, to occupy the dorsal recumbent

position. This feature has been utilized to support the theory of an

initial congestion, which is supposed to be relieved or aggravated

according as the cord is kept elevated or depressed.

[Footnote 96: These symptoms are to be regarded as actual parts of the

myelitic symptoms only when they accompany the prodromal or initial

periods. The later complications, uræmia and septicæmia, the latter

arising from pyelitis, cystitis, or decubitus, often lead to

constitutional disturbance which is not due to the myelitis as such.]

In most cases of transverse myelitis, when the anterior cornua are

destructively involved, we possess in the electrical tests valuable

and unerring means of determining the altitude and extent of the

lesion. Whenever we find the atrophy of a paralyzed muscle accompanied

by qualitative electrical changes in myelitis, we must conclude that

the cell-group from which that muscle receives its nerve-supply is

destructively involved.[97] These changes are particularly well

demonstrable when the {818} cervical or lumbar enlargements are

affected. They are not as readily ascertainable in the case of a

transverse myelitis in the upper dorsal region, on account of the

situation of the muscles supplied by the upper dorsal nerves, and the

consequent difficulty of application of the necessary tests.

[Footnote 97: The proposition, originally, I believe, made by myself,

that there are distinct cell-groups in the spinal cord which are

constant with certain animal species, and correspond in relative

development to ventral, dorsal, and appendicular muscular groups

(“Architecture and Mechanism of the Brain,” _Journal of Nervous and

Mental Diseases_, April, 1880), appears to be confirmed in a general

way by the researches and cases of Edinger, Kahler-Pick,

Dejerine-Major, Genzmer, Von Monakow, Sahli, Prévost-David, F.

Schultze, Remak, and Parrot-Joffroy; for the knowledge of the first

and last of which I am indebted to the review of the subject by Starr

(“Localization of the Functions of the Spinal Cord,” _American Journal

of Neurology and Psychiatry_, August, 1883).]

The disturbance of the deep reflexes with very few exceptions affects

the same peripheries as are represented in the destroyed and impaired

gray nuclei. Thus, if the lower part of the lumbar enlargement be

affected, the reflexes of the Achilles tendon and the gluteal muscles

will disappear; if the upper lumbar enlargement, the knee-jerk

disappears.[98] Disease of the lower part of the cervical enlargement

is in like manner associated with absence of the wrist-tendon

reflexes, while the disappearance of the elbow-tendon reflex suggests

a higher involvement at the levels of the fifth and sixth cervical

nerve-roots.

[Footnote 98: The disappearance of the knee-jerk and similar reflexes

was originally supposed to be a phenomenon exclusively pertaining to

spinal disease and to a destructive lesion anywhere in the track of

the centripetal and centrifugal nerves connected with that segment of

the cord in which the reflex is supposed to be translated. But aside

from a number of physiological observations[99] which prove that

cerebral conditions may influence the intensity of the jerk, there are

pathological ones which show that it may be permanently abolished in

disease of the pons and cerebellum, and temporarily abolished or

diminished immediately after capsular and ventricular hemorrhage. The

associated symptoms in the former case, and the history of the onset

and total hemiplegia in the latter, serve to distinguish them from

destructive spinal lesions should the occasion for discriminating

between them ever arise; which is not likely.

[Footnote 99: S. Weir Mitchell and M. J. Lewis found that voluntary

effort increases the jerk at first, but if continued diminishes its

excursiveness (_The Medical News_, 1886, Feb. 13th and 20th).]

In complete transverse acute myelitis of the cervical region high

fever is a constant symptom. In unilateral myelitis of this region

flushing of the face and unilateral sweating are produced, together

with iridoplegia, sometimes preceded by dilatation, owing to initial

irritation and succeeding paralysis of the sympathetic branches

originating at this level of the cord.

Just as the disturbed reflexes and the belt sensations enable us to

distinguish at what levels of the cord the myelitis is situated, so

the distribution of the motor and sensory paralysis affords

corroborative evidence of such location and additional proof of its

extent and intensity.

Transverse myelitis at and above the level of origin of the phrenic

nerve is almost immediately fatal, through its interference with the

innervations required in respiration. In the upper part of the

cervical enlargement it produces complete paraplegia of motion and

sensation in the trunk and all four extremities. In the lowest part of

the cervical enlargement it produces paralysis of the same parts, but

the serratus magnus and scapular muscles escape. The nuclei of origin

of the muscles moving the upper extremity are situated so that those

which are farthest removed from the axis of the body when the arms are

extended are situated lowest in the cord. The sensory paralysis is

distributed in harmony with the motor paralysis; that is, when there

is paralysis of motion in the hand {819} and forearm the anæsthesia or

subjective numbness is also in the hand and forearm. The same

correspondence is not found in affections of the lumbar enlargement,

for anæsthesia of the gluteal region accompanies paralysis of the

crural muscles when the lesion is low down at the level of the lower

lumbar and upper sacral nerves. The distribution of the anæsthesia, in

other words, is not by segments of the limb, but by surfaces. The

gluteal, posterior femoral, gastrocnemial, and outer pedal surfaces

are affected together with the muscles moving the foot, while the

thigh and inner side of the leg and foot become anæsthetic, with

lesion of the upper part of the lumbar enlargement accompanying

paralysis of the quadriceps and deep muscles. It is not difficult to

understand this discrepancy when we bear in mind the different plan of

distribution followed by the brachial plexus as compared with the

lumbar and sacral plexuses. It is not, in my experience, found that

the anæsthesia affects that surface which covers the part moved by the

paralyzed muscle; which is characteristic of associated paralysis and

anæsthesia from cortical disease.

One of the most dreaded occurrences in acute myelitis is the malignant

bed-sore. The ordinary decubitus which results from the protracted

sojourn of the patient in bed, coupled with the prominence of his

trochanters and sacrum resulting from general or atrophic emaciation,

is also common, but is comparatively benign and easy to prevent or to

manage when established. The malignant bed-sore, on the other hand, is

a spontaneous occurrence, due to the same obscure but undeniable

trophic influences exerted for good by the normal and for evil by the

diseased nerve-centres, which play so large a part in the

symptomatology of tabes dorsalis. It cannot be avoided; it is not due

to pressure alone, or, as some have claimed, to the macerating

influence of the dribbling and decomposing urine. The development of

this lesion is exceedingly rapid, and it may be regarded as a sort of

local gangrene. The skin shows a livid color; vesicles appear, then

burst; the part becomes denuded; and within a few days a deep ulcer

with a dark border and base appears, discharging a sanious fluid. The

subsequent history is that of a rapid extension and destruction of the

neighboring tissues, even down to the bone, and if situated over the

sacrum opening into the spinal canal through the necrotic arches of

the sacral vertebra, thus leading either to general septicæmia or to

putrid infection of the spinal meningeal sac. Occasionally, gangrenous

spots coexist on other parts of the body, notably the lower

extremities, where neither pressure nor maceration can be accused of

playing a part, proving that the process is primarily due to the

spinal affection.

Acute central myelitis, as described by Dujardin-Beaumetz, Hayem,

Hallopeau, and Erb, usually runs its course very rapidly. Indeed, all

of these observers speak of it as the most violent and quickly fatal

variety of spinal inflammation. I have, however, seen one case with T.

A. McBride at the Presbyterian Hospital in which all the

characteristic symptoms of acute central myelitis were markedly

developed and present in their characteristic groupings, and yet the

patient had been suffering from progressing symptoms of myelitis for

one year and a half before that time.[100] {820} Usually, complete

anæsthesia and paralysis of the lower half of the body occur in this

form. But the most characteristic feature is a rapidly progressive

atrophy not only of the paralyzed muscles, but also of some which are

still partially under the dominion of the will. With this there is

extreme vesical and rectal trouble, the sphincters being paralyzed. As

a rule, the deep and superficial reflexes are destroyed—they are

always diminished—and trophic disturbances of a malignant type, such

as acute decubitus, joint-changes, and œdema, are common. The

paraplegia is characterized by the flaccid condition of the limbs; the

contractures and spastic symptoms found with other forms of myelitis

are entirely absent, and qualitative electrical changes, beginning

with disappearance of farado-muscular contractility, are found in the

atrophying muscles. There are marked constitutional symptoms with this

form; the tendency to an ascent of the process and successive

involvement of one segment after another of the gray matter is great,

and a fatal issue, as far as known, is inevitable.

[Footnote 100: At the time the patient had undergone such a profound

change in appearance that I failed to remember him, and it was only by

accident I learned that I had seen him in private consultation with

his family attendent, F. A. McGuire, a year previous. On the latter

occasion I had made the diagnosis of subacute myelitis chiefly limited

to the posterior columns; there were ataxia, both static and

locomotor, slight incontinence, belt sensation, and ocular symptoms,

with abolition of the deep reflexes in the lower limbs.]

DIAGNOSIS.—The principles governing the determination of the affected

region of the cord in acute myelitis are exactly the same as those

detailed in the later sections on Chronic Myelitis or Sclerosis, the

acuteness of the onset, and the relapses which sometimes occur, and

the predominance of irritative spasms—which, however, is an inconstant

criterion—serving to distinguish between the acute and chronic form of

spinal inflammation. In the present state of our knowledge it is

impossible to always differentiate between acute central myelitis and

syringo-myelus—a condition in which the formation of a periendymal

neoplasm, and its subsequent breaking down in the axis of the cord,

lead to the formation of a tubular cavity.[101] The neoplasm in this

instance is classified among the gliomatous new formations. The

symptoms depend, exactly as do those of myelitis, on the distribution

of the destructive lesion. In some cases the posterior cornua and

columns are chiefly involved, and extreme anæsthesia is found; in

others the anterior columns are affected, and the symptoms of a

poliomyelitis or an imperfect transverse myelitis may be

imitated.[102]

[Footnote 101: This cavity, unlike that of hydro-myelus, is not a

dilatation of the central canal, but, lying to one side of it, is

excavated in the cord-substance.]

[Footnote 102: Repeated fractures have been noted in cases marked by

profound analgesia. It is believed that they are not always due to

trophic changes, but may be the result of muscular action, exaggerated

on account of the patient's inability to gauge his efforts. Still, in

the majority of cases the presence of positive trophic disturbances of

the skin seems to indicate the probability of some textural change

facilitating the fracture.]

As a rule, the sensory disturbance in syringo-myelus is out of

proportion to the muscular atrophy developed; that is, it involves a

far more extensive province. It is usually of a peculiar character:

some forms of sensation are involved but slightly, or even escape, and

others may be nearly destroyed. Commonly, it is the pain and

temperature-sense which suffer most, while the cutaneous space and

pressure, as well as the muscular sense, are not materially disturbed.

These peculiarities are not commonly found in cases of myelitis, and

when present, and particularly when the paralytic or sensory

affections involve all four extremities {821} alike, they suggest the

existence of syringo-myelus. As yet we are unable to make more than a

probable diagnosis between the two diseases.

DURATION AND PROGNOSIS.—The duration of the disease varies. Cases of

the apoplectiform variety are mentioned, in which the process reached

its height in a few minutes, or where the patient, having retired in

good health the night before, awoke finding himself paralyzed in the

lower half of his body. Death may terminate such a case in a few days

or weeks. In another class of cases, complicated by serious

involvement of the bladder, the fatal termination is often

precipitated by putrid cystitis, pyelitis, or uræmic poisoning, and

even in cases which have passed the dangers of the early period in

safety these ominous complications may develop with the usual result

many years after the beginning of the illness. In a number of cases

the first period, that in which the morbid process becomes developed,

is followed by one of comparative quiescence, in which the paralyses

of sensation and motion then established remain stationary for months

and years. A number of authors, Erb, Leyden, Strümpell, and Ross,

speak of such a case as one in which chronic myelitis has followed an

acute myelitis. It seems improper to use the terms acute or chronic in

this way. As it is generally understood that the term acute applies to

myelitis in which disintegration of the nerve-elements predominates

over interstitial proliferation, and in which the secondary sclerosis

is rather like the cicatrix of an acute inflammation and necrosis, it

should not be confounded at any period, no matter how similar the

clinical signs may be, with a process which is essentially an

interstitial one from the start. If chronic amaurosis results from an

acute glaucoma, we do not change the latter designation to chronic

glaucoma.

In cases where the symptoms at the acme indicate rather an involvement

of the peripheral than the central paths of the cord, and in which an

incomplete motor and sensory paralysis develops, the patients often

regain a considerable amount of motor power and sensation, so that

they may reach a good age, suffering at most from a paresis of some

one muscle or muscular group, occasional bladder trouble, and pains.

It has been laid down as a rule that where paraplegia and other signs

remain stationary for years, there is no hope of even partial

recovery. The following remarkable and well-attested case proves that

this rule is not without exceptions:

Isidor K——, æt. forty-four years, worker in tobacco. After

over-exertion in the fall of the year 1879 he had numbness, tingling,

dorsal pain, and paresis rapidly developed, which induced him to

consult the physicians at the clinic of the University of the City of

New York. After some slight improvement a relapse occurred, and

several others followed, usually provoked by over-exertion, till he

became completely paraplegic. He was, according to his account,

several times exhibited to a medical class by William A. Hammond, and

remembers that this authority spoke of a possible ascent of the

affection and ensuing involvement of the arms. His bladder was at no

time seriously disturbed. For four years and three months he was

totally paraplegic; his lower extremities were without life; and for

the greater part of the time he could not move his toes. The limbs

were cold and pale, but underwent little atrophy. The only exercise

obtained during this time was in a roller carriage. His sexual power

was abolished throughout the whole {822} four years and over. Nothing

can be learned as to his reflexes in this period.[103] The paralysis

of sensation was as complete as that of motion, and the lower limbs

never perspired. The arms remained free. There was a dorsal belt

sensation.

[Footnote 103: Hammond has no notes of the case, having discontinued

the clinic, and Ludwig Weiss, the physician in charge, saw him only

occasionally in behalf of a benefit society.]

A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 5 · 第 112 / 185 段