SYMPTOMATOLOGY.—Spina bifida forms a tumor—or, more rarely, several

tumors—in the region of the vertebral column, usually discovered at

birth, but occasionally not noticed until a later period. Thus,

Lancisi mentions a case in which the tumor first made its appearance

in a hydrocephalic child at the age of five years, and J. L. Apin one

in which the patient reached the age of twenty before any swelling was

manifested. If these records are accepted as authentic, the only

satisfactory explanation is that of Itard—viz. that the bony

deficiency existed from the time of birth, and that the dropsical

protrusion did not occur until afterward: this seems to me more

reasonable than the suggestion of the younger Andral, that the

vertebræ underwent a process of secondary softening and absorption.

The part most frequently affected is the lumbar region, but cases are

not wanting of the occurrence of spina bifida in the cervical, dorsal,

and sacral regions, and even, in at least one case (Genga's), in the

coccyx. The tumor almost invariably occupies the median line, and

projects directly backward: in at least four cases, however, recorded

by Bryant, Emmet, and Thomas, the tumor protruded anteriorly from

deficiency of the vertebral bodies.

The size of a spina bifida varies from that of a walnut to that of a

child's head, or even larger: in some rare instances, such as those

recorded by Lezelius and Richard, the whole spinal column has been

cleft, and the tumor has extended from nucha to sacrum; but cases of

this kind seldom come under the surgeon's observation, as children

with such extensive deformity usually perish shortly after birth. The

shape of the swelling is rounded, or more often oval; it is commonly

sessile, but occasionally pedunculated; and it is sometimes lobulated,

the lobules being separated by more or less distinct sulci. The skin

covering the tumor is in some cases normal, with more or less fat in

the subcutaneous connective tissue, but more often thin, tightly

stretched, red, shining, and occasionally ulcerated; more rarely it is

thickened and leathery, as in a case referred to by Sir Prescott

Hewett. Sometimes a navel-like depression is found at some part of the

surface, corresponding, as pointed out by Follin and Duplay, and by

Erb, to the place of attachment, on the interior of the sac, of the

terminal extremity of the spinal cord. The cutaneous investment is

sometimes altogether wanting, the spinal dura mater itself forming the

external covering of the tumor. It is in these cases especially that

ulceration and rupture are apt to occur.

Spinæ bifidæ are usually soft and fluctuating, and occasionally

partially reducible; their tension and elasticity are increased when

the child is in the upright position or during the acts of expiration

and crying, and are diminished during inspiration or when the child is

laid upon its face. When the part is relaxed a bony prominence can be

felt on either side, and the aperture in the vertebral column can be

more or less distinctly {759} outlined. The swelling is apt to be

painful on pressure. If the tumor is of moderate size and covered with

healthy skin, there are usually no constitutional symptoms, and, even

where ulceration and rupture occur, the opening may heal and a

spontaneous cure may possibly ensue. More often, as the tumor

increases in bulk—or at any time if pressure be made upon it—various

nervous symptoms are observed: drowsiness, muscular twitchings,

convulsions, and often paraplegia and paralysis of the sphincters.

Rupture is usually followed by the development of spinal meningitis,

or may prove directly the cause of death by the loss of cerebro-spinal

fluid which it causes; in other instances, however, if the rupture be

a small one, healing may occur (as already mentioned) or a fistulous

opening may persist; in rare cases the fluid may escape by a process

of transudation without rupture, as in an example recorded by Laborie.

As may be inferred from what has already been said, the course of

spina bifida is usually rapid and toward a fatal termination. In some

instances, however, as in cases observed by Holmes, and more recently

by Lithgow, spontaneous recovery has followed the obliteration of the

channel which unites the sac with the cavity of the spinal membranes;

and in other instances, without a cure having been effected, life has

been prolonged for very many years. Thus, Behrend reports a case in

which a patient with spina bifida lived to the age of fifty, and

Holmes refers to another in which death resulted from an independent

disease at the age of forty-three. But a still more remarkable case

was recorded by Callender, the patient in this instance having reached

the age of seventy-four.

PATHOLOGY AND MORBID ANATOMY.—The most important points for

consideration in respect to the anatomy of spina bifida are the

relations which the spinal cord and spinal nerves bear to the sac, and

the nature of the contained fluid. It is ordinarily said that the

spinal cord itself commonly enters the sac of a spina bifida—the

report of the London Clinical Society's committee gives the proportion

of cases in which it does so at 63 per cent.—and Holmes figures a

specimen from the museum of St. George's Hospital, London, in which

this condition is obviously present; on the other hand, Mayo-Robson in

eight operations only once found the cord implicated; and the late

John B. S. Jackson of Boston—whose name will be recognized as one of

high authority in regard to all questions of morbid anatomy—once

assured me that he had made very many dissections of spinæ bifidæ, and

that he had invariably found that the cord stopped short of the sac,

and that only the nerves entered the latter: this, as negative

evidence, cannot of course contravene such positive evidence as that

of the specimen referred to by Holmes, but it would seem to show that

the condition was a less common one than is generally supposed, and

that in at least a fair proportion of cases the cord itself did not

form part of the sac contents. This remark applies especially to those

cases in which the fluid is accumulated in the subarachnoid space, and

in which, as pointed out by Sir P. Hewett, the cauda equina or spinal

nerves are pushed by the vis a tergo into the sac; but when the

dropsical effusion occupies the central canal of the cord, this is apt

to be flattened and spread out like a thin lining to the sac, just as

the brain is spread over the inner wall of the skull in cases of

internal hydrocephalus; and, on the other hand, when the accumulated

fluid fills the cavity of the arachnoid the cord is apt to be pushed

forward, and the {760} sac may be entirely devoid of all

nerve-structures. Such, too, according to Giraldès, is the case in

spina bifida of the cervico-dorsal region.

The committee of the London Clinical Society classify cases of spina

bifida in three divisions: (1) Those in which the membranes only

protrude (spinal meningocele); (2) those in which the protrusion

involves both the cord and membranes (meningo-myelocele); and (3)

those in which the central canal of the cord itself forms the cavity

of the sac (syringo-myelocele). The last variety is the rarest, as the

second is the most common. In meningo-myeloceles the spinal cord with

its central canal is continued within the median, vertical portion of

the sac, and at this part there is no covering of true skin; the

nerve-roots which traverse the sac arise from this intramural portion

of the central nervous system.

Humphry of Cambridge, England, makes a somewhat similar classification

of spinæ bifidæ, recognizing as the most common variety the

hydrorachis externa anterior, in which the fluid occupies the

subarachnoid space in front of the spinal cord, and in which “the cord

and the nerves are stretched backwards and outwards upon the sac, and

are there confluent, together with the arachnoid, pia mater, and dura

mater, or their representatives, in the thin membrane which forms the

hindmost part of the wall of the sac;” rarer forms are the

hydro-meningocele, or hydrorachis externa posterior, in which the

fluid accumulates behind the cord, which does not enter the sac, and

the hydro-myelocele or hydrorachis interna, in which the fluid

occupies the central spinal canal.

The theory which, according to the Clinical Society's committee, best

explains the pathological anatomy of spina bifida is that which

assumes a primary defect of development of the mesoblast from which

the structures closing in the vertebral furrow are developed.

The fluid of spina bifida appears to be identical in character with

the cerebro-spinal fluid. Bostock found that it was very slightly

clouded by the application of heat, and that it contained, in 100

parts, 97.8 of water, 1.0 of chloride of sodium, 0.5 of albumen, 0.5

of mucus, 0.2 of gelatin, and some traces of lime. Five specimens more

recently analyzed by Hoppe-Seyler gave an average of 98.8 parts water,

0.15 parts proteids, and 1.06 extractives and salts. Turner found a

reaction somewhat similar to that of grape-sugar, as had been

previously found by Bussy and Deschamps in cerebro-spinal fluid

itself, but in two specimens analyzed by Noad for Holmes it was at

least very doubtful whether sugar was actually present. “The first

specimen was found to be completely neutral; its specific gravity was

1.0077; it contained phosphates, but no reaction could be obtained

resembling that of sugar. The second specimen ... did give a reaction

with copper like that of sugar, but no trace of fermentation could be

obtained.” Three analyses, however, made by Halliburton for the London

Clinical Society's committee showed uniformly a decided trace of

sugar, with a diminution in the quantity of proteids, which appeared

to consist entirely of globulin.

In some cases the sac of a spina bifida contains, besides

nerve-structures and cerebro-spinal fluid, both fibrous and fatty

tissues.

DIAGNOSIS.—Ordinary fatty tumors have been mistaken for spinæ bifidæ,

but such an error could only be committed through carelessness: more

difficult is the diagnosis from certain forms of congenital cyst,

occupying the median line of the back, and still more difficult the

{761} diagnosis from the several affections known as false spina

bifida. In the former case the distinction might be made by noting the

irreducibility, constant shape, and unchanging tenseness of the cyst,

and perhaps, as suggested by T. Smith, by tracing the line of spinous

processes beneath it; some information, too, might perhaps be gained

by chemical examination of the fluid obtained by puncture. Under the

name of false spina bifida Holmes includes three distinct conditions:

these are—(1) a true spina bifida, in which the connection with the

spinal membranes has in some way been obliterated, the sac then

communicating with the vertebral canal, but not with the theca; (2) a

congenital, cystic, or fatty tumor, taking its origin within the

vertebral canal, and projecting through an opening caused by a gap in

the laminæ; and (3) a tumor containing fœtal remains, and properly

regarded as an example of included fœtation. In any of these cases a

positive diagnosis might be impossible, and the probable nature of the

tumor could only be inferred by noting the absence of one or more of

the characteristic symptoms of true spina bifida.

PROGNOSIS.—The prognosis of spina bifida is without question

unfavorable; at the same time the affection is by no means to be

considered, as it was formerly, one of an invariably fatal character,

for, apart from the fact already mentioned that several cases are on

record in which patients with untreated spina bifida have reached

adult life, and even old age, the modern method of treatment has

proved so much more successful than those formerly employed that in

favorable cases surgical interference affords at least a reasonable

prospect of recovery. The circumstances which especially furnish

grounds for an unfavorable prognosis are the rapid growth of the

tumor, the thinning or ulceration of its coverings, and the occurrence

of nervous symptoms, and particularly of paralysis or convulsions.

TREATMENT.—This may be either palliative or radical. If the tumor be

not increasing materially in size, the surgeon may properly content

himself with palliative measures—applying equable support and perhaps

slight pressure by the use of a well-padded cap of gutta-percha or

leather, an air-pad, or, as advised by Treves, a simple pad of cotton

smeared with vaseline, and a bandage; if the tumor be small and

covered with healthy integument, painting its surface with collodion

may be of service through the contractile property of that substance.

Radical measures are only indicated when the child, otherwise healthy,

seems to have his life threatened by the rapid growth of the tumor,

causing risk of ulceration and rupture, or giving rise to convulsions

or paralysis. The principal modes of treatment to be considered under

this heading are—(1) simple tapping or paracentesis; (2) injection of

iodine; (3) ligation of the neck of the sac; and (4) excision.

(1) Paracentesis, a simple evacuation of the fluid contents of the

sac, is the only operation ordinarily justifiable in cases attended by

paralysis or other grave nervous manifestations. The puncture should

be made in the lower part of the sac and at a distance from the median

line (in the course of which the nerve-structures are particularly

distributed), and only a small quantity of fluid—a few drachms or at

most one or two ounces—should be removed at a time, the instrument

being at once withdrawn if convulsions follow, and the wound being

instantly closed with lint dipped in compound tincture of benzoin.

Either an aspirator-tube or a {762} small trocar may be used, and the

operation may be repeated if necessary, pressure being maintained

during the intervals. Paracentesis has occasionally though not often

proved curative.

(2) Injection of Iodine.—This mode of treatment was introduced about

the same time by Velpeau and by Brainard of Chicago. The latter

surgeon's method consists in injecting, after only partially emptying

the tumor, a solution of iodine with iodide of potassium (iodine, 5

grs.; iodide of potassium, 15 grs.; water, 1 fl. oz.), allowing it to

flow out again, washing out the sac with water, and finally

reinjecting a portion of the cerebro-spinal fluid originally

evacuated; and the former's, in completely evacuating the tumor, and

then injecting a mixture of iodine and iodide of potassium, each one

part to ten parts of water. Each of these plans has met with a fair

measure of success;[1] but the modification introduced by James Morton

of Glasgow is a great improvement, and affords what is actually the

most successful mode yet devised for dealing with spina bifida. Morton

employs a solution of iodine in glycerin (iodine, 10 grs.; iodide of

potassium, 30 grs.; glycerin, 1 fl. oz.), which has the advantage of

being less diffusible than the aqueous solution, and therefore less

liable to enter the spinal canal. The tumor is about half emptied, and

a small quantity—from fluid drachm ss to fluid drachm iij of the

solution—is then slowly injected, and allowed to remain. The operation

is repeated after a few days if necessary. Of 50 cases known to Morton

as having been treated in this way up to May, 1885, 41 were regarded

as successful; but of 71 cases collected by the London Clinical

Society's committee, only 39 had been benefited by the operation.

[Footnote 1: In a case recently recorded by Woltering, however, iodine

injection was followed by death within half an hour.]

The introduction of iodine into the sac of a spina bifida is,

according to Morton, only justifiable in cases unattended by

paralysis; under opposite circumstances I should be disposed to try a

plan recently employed with success by Noble Smith in a case of

meningocele—viz. injecting the iodo-glycerin solution into the

coverings of the sac, and as close to it as possible without

perforating it.

(3) and (4). Ligation and excision have each occasionally effected a

cure, but more often have but helped to precipitate a fatal issue. A

successful case of ligation followed by excision has been recently

recorded by Löbker. The elastic ligature, applied around the neck of

the sac (if this be pedunculated), has been employed by Laroyenne,

Ball, Colognese, Baldossare, Mouchet, and other surgeons, and of 6

cases collected by Mouchet, 3 ended in recovery. Another success has

been recently recorded by Turretta. The écraseur has been used, but

its employment cannot be recommended. Compression by clamps is advised

by Schatz of Rostock. Ligation is best adapted to cases occurring in

the cervical and dorsal regions, in which, as pointed out by Giraldès,

nerve-elements are less likely to be involved. Excision, supplemented

by transplantation of a strip of periosteum from a rabbit, has been

successfully resorted to by Mayo-Robson and by R. T. Hayes of

Rochester, N. Y.; and simple excision, with suture in separate lines

of the sac and integuments, by Mayo-Robson, Atkinson, and Jessop. The

Clinical Society's committee in all refers to 23 cases treated by

excision, 16 of which are said to have been successful.

{763}

ANÆMIA AND HYPERÆMIA OF THE BRAIN AND SPINAL CORD.

BY E. C. SPITZKA, M.D.

Cerebral Hyperæmia.

Up to within a few years it was a favorite mode of explaining the

results of the administration of certain narcotic and stimulant drugs,

and certain of the active symptoms of mental derangement, to attribute

them to an increased blood-supply of the nerve-centres. This view

seemed to harmonize so thoroughly with the physiological dictum that

functional activity depends on the supply of oxygenated blood that the

first attempts at questioning it were treated as heresies. To-day,

however, few authorities can be found to adhere unreservedly to this

once-popular and easy explanation. The drift of physiological and

medical opinion is in the direction of regarding some subtle molecular

and dynamic state of the nerve-elements as the essential factor in

intoxications as well as in maniacal and other forms of insane

excitement: if they be complicated by active or passive congestions,

this is probably a secondary occurrence of modifying but not of

intrinsic determining power. While this change in our views is the

natural result of progress in experimental pharmacology and pathology,

it does not justify the extreme assertion that there is no disorder of

the brain functions deserving the name of congestion and hyperæmia.

This assertion seems to have been provoked by the careless manner in

which these terms have been employed to designate conditions which are

in reality the most different in nature that can be well conceived. No

one familiar with the extent to which the term “congestion of the base

of the brain” has been abused in this country will marvel that the

reaction provoked by it has overstepped the boundaries of cautious

criticism. That there are physiological hyperæmias of the brain is now

universally admitted; the most recent experimental observations,

indeed, conform most closely to the claims of the older investigators.

It naturally follows that pathological hyperæmias are both possible

and probable, and even if the observations in the dead-house do not

strongly sustain the existence of pathological hyperæmias and

congestions independently of gross disease, clinical analysis and the

gratifying results of appropriate treatment justify us in retaining

these designations in our nomenclature with the limitation here

implied.

One great difficulty in determining the precise nature of the

disorders which the physician is called upon to treat on the theory of

hyperæmia lies in the number of factors which may contribute to or

modify its {764} development. If, for example, the action of the heart

be increased through hypertrophy, the result to the cerebral

circulation will obviously be different in a plethoric and in an

anæmic person; it will be also very much different in the event of the

stimulation of the centres which contract the calibre of the cerebral

blood-vessels from what it would be if there were a state of vascular

relaxation. Should the cardiac hypertrophy be associated with renal

disease, other disturbing elements may be introduced, such as

arterio-fibrosis, or the presence in the blood of certain toxic

substances having direct effects of their own on the nerve-elements.

The picture may be still more complicated by variations in the

intracranial pressure. It is impossible to prove, either by direct or

indirect evidence, that there is such a pathological state as a simple

cerebral hyperæmia; indeed, there is one fact which militates strongly

against, if it be not fatal to, such an assumption. Were a

physiological hyperæmia to become intensified to a pathological

degree, we should have corresponding clinical phenomena. In other

words, the culmination of the morbid process should be preceded by an

exaggerated physiological excitation similar to that observed with

intoxications. But this is rarely the case, and we accordingly find

that the more cautious writers, like Nothnagel,[1] do not commit

themselves to the view that the results of mental overstrain[2] are to

be classed as simple cerebral hyperæmia. Similar restrictions are to

be made regarding the established congestive states, such as those

following sunstroke. It has been usually supposed that insolation

directly produces cerebral hyperæmia, even to the degree of

engorgement, and that the after symptoms in persons who recover are

due to the non-return of the meningeal and cerebral blood-vessels to

their normal calibre, and to other more remote results of vascular

stasis. The latter half of this proposition is in part correct; the

former is contradicted by numerous pathological observations. Thus,

Arndt,[3] who had the opportunity of studying over one hundred cases

occurring in the course of a forced march of a division of infantry

from Berlin to Pankow, many of which terminated fatally, found almost

uniformly a pale brain, with peculiar color-changes, denoting rather

structural than circulatory trouble.[4] The {765} whole list of causes

of what is commonly designated cerebral hyperæmia, congestion, and

engorgement may be gone through with and similar modifying statements

be found to apply to them. The nearest approach to an ideal cerebral

congestion is that found with acute alcoholic intoxication. This is at

first accompanied by cerebral hyperæmia, which, with the comatose

climax, becomes an engorgement; accordingly, many of the results of

acute alcoholic intoxication are attributed to the circulatory

condition alone. The congestive troubles due to alcoholism which come

to the special ken of the physician, however, are those found with the

chronic form, and here a more complex pathological condition is found

to underlie it; the organization of the brain is altered, the vascular

channels more or less diseased, and the vaso-motor mechanism

continuously deranged. This disorder, as well as the apoplectiform

states attributed to vascular stasis, and the active and passive

hyperæmias associated with tumors, meningitic and other gross diseases

of the brain, as well as with the status epilepticus, are usually

included in the discussion of cerebral congestion, and serve to swell

up the chapters devoted to it. They will be found discussed in more

appropriate situations in this volume. In this place it is proposed to

consider only those congestive states which present themselves to the

physician, independently of conditions which, if associated,

preponderate in clinical and therapeutic importance.[5]

[Footnote 1: _Ziemssen's Cyclopædia_, “Nervous System,” i. p. 39, 2d

German ed.]

A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 5 · 第 103 / 185 段