Ferrier distinguishes just adjacent to this centre the motor centres

for the tongue and mouth and upper extremities, showing an anatomical

association of the processes of articulate and written speech.

But purely motor impulses comprise only a portion of the phenomena of

speech. The external world must be brought into relation with the

mind, and this is done through the perceptions. We may say that

perceptions are apprehended sensations, and this apprehension demands

a localized field of cerebral activity, as well as the motor energies.

It seems natural enough that experiment should have located (Ferrier)

perceptive, visual, and acoustic centres in the posterior cortical

areas and temporo-sphenoidal lobes—that the motor and perceptive areas

should be contiguous and sharing a common blood-supply.

The perceptive visual centre is found to occupy the occipital lobes,

while the acoustic centre occupies the whole length of the first

temporo-sphenoidal convolution.

As motor impulses found a path to the motor ganglia, and finally to

the cord, so the course of sensory perceptive impressions can be

traced back through the posterior internal capsule and through the

optic thalami to the sensory columns of the medulla and cord.

Intuitive and sense perception, even when reinforced with motor power,

cannot result in articulation. The mechanism of speech requires a

co-ordinating centre, and this basal phonic centre of Kussmaul is

located in the medulla near the origin of the hypoglossal and facial

nerves. From the medulla proceed the nerves supplying the machinery of

{568} phonation, the superior laryngeal nerve to the mucous membrane

of the larynx and to the crico-thyroid muscle, the most important

muscle of phonation. The remaining laryngeal muscles are supplied by

the recurrent laryngeal; the motor processes of articulation are

guided by the hypoglossal, facial, and fibres of the

glosso-pharyngeal.

The larynx is a reed, with the addition of numerous resonance-cavities

producing abundant overtones. It may be considered as a box composed

of two segments, the lower of which has vertical motion upon the joint

at the posterior junction of the superior and inferior segments. By

this motion the tongue of the reed (vocal cords, stretching

antero-posteriorly from lower segment to junction with upper segment)

is tightened or relaxed, the vibratory blast of air coming through the

trachea from the lungs. The superior aperture of the tube is guarded

by the epiglottis and false vocal cords. As auxiliaries are the

pharyngeal, oral, and nasal cavities, with the associated bony

cavities of the skull, the soft palate acting as a movable partition

or switch, the hard palate as a sounding-board or resonance-surface.

The reed is applicable to the production of musical sounds; the

tongue, lips, and teeth are required for the checks in those sounds,

constituting the consonants or division utterances.

The curious phenomenon of the falsetto voice is thought by Helmholtz

to be produced by the attenuation of the true cords and the vibration

of their thinned edges.

DEVELOPMENT OF LANGUAGE.—The study of language demonstrates its origin

to have been largely in exclamations and imitative sounds, from which

our vowels can easily have arisen. The growth of all synthetic

language illustrates the aggregation of accessory sounds about the

primitive root-sound, while the common tendency to the insertion of

consonants shows their addition to the primitive vowels. That the long

vowels should have undergone countless modifications from the physical

peculiarities and environment of those speaking them is but natural,

for the number of vowels remaining in actual use in any language is

not large. Consonants serve to make more clear by their separation of

vowel-sounds the meaning to be conveyed; their development resulted

from vowel changes, and their number is small.

The written characters of language represent only the usage of the

majority. Individual speech and pronunciation vary as greatly as do

languages themselves, and it is evident that the speech of any

individual is as truly peculiar as his physical conformation.

To recapitulate, we find ideas, the material of speech, formed in the

cerebral cortex. Speech-volition becomes motor impulse at Broca's

convolution; such impulse passes along the internal capsule to the

corpus striatum, where it is co-ordinated probably in the formation of

syllables, thence to the medulla, whence the mechanism of the larynx

receives its co-ordinated stimulation.

Disorders of Speech.

The classification of the disorders of speech should depend on the

anatomical site of the lesions by which they are occasioned. Broadly

{569} speaking, speech disorders resolve themselves into those of the

formative apparatus for ideas and symbols and those of the purely

co-ordinating and conducting mechanism. Abbreviating the schedule of

Potter, we may say that the disorders of speech may be included in

three classes—alalia, or lack of speech; paralalia, defective speech,

the stammering of most observers; and dyslalia, difficult speech or

stuttering.

The anatomy of the blood-supply of the speech-centres affords some

explanation of alalia. The Sylvian artery will be remembered as the

feeder of the speech-centres—an artery often the source of hemorrhage,

as Charcot suggests, from the angle at which it leaves the carotid.

Ducrot explains the frequency of left-sided softening and hemorrhage

from the manner of origin of the left carotid, its axis being more

nearly that of the ascending aorta and furnishing a ready channel for

cardiac clots. In regard to the relative frequency of peripheral and

central hemorrhage, Andral and Durand-Fardel cite 119 cases, of which

but 17 were in the anterior or posterior lobes. It is admitted that

cerebral lesions are largely those of the circulatory system, and the

fact that such lesions result in the suspension of the activity of

restricted areas is due to the circumstance that the cerebral arteries

are terminal vessels giving off no anastomosing branches and supplying

restricted areas only. With blood-supply so arranged it is not

difficult to understand how the different portions of the motor

centres may be separately involved, and thus the motor functions of

speech may become singly at fault.

Inability to remember words and inability to form the motor impulses

necessary for speech or writing are the common forms of alalia or

aphasia, the former being known as amnesic, the latter as ataxic,

alalia. In addition, we may cite the failure of cerebral power

occurring in general softening, in microcephalic brains, and the

curious instances of voluntary silence from some strong belief or

prejudice. Instances of the gradual resumption of cerebral function

after its loss are not wanting; and, occurring where subsequent

post-mortem examinations reveal a limited area of destruction of

brain-tissue, they afford examples of the vicarious performance of

cerebral functions by contiguous areas.

The phenomena of amnesic alalia are commonly seen in cases of recovery

from cerebral hemorrhage, cerebral injury, and severe febrile

affections. Numerous cases are recorded where the memory of things

themselves remained, but the faculty of denoting them had been

destroyed.

Kussmaul distinguishes here two conditions: 1st, where the word is

entirely effaced from memory, 2d, where it still remains, but its

association with that which it represents is suppressed. Cases of the

second class are the most frequent, the fundamental part which the

association of ideas plays in mental activity and the extent to which

memory is dependent on association explaining this fact. A marked

example of the failure of the denotative faculty lies in the cases of

forgetfulness of one's own name, as described by Crichton in the case

of an ambassador at the Russian court, who was obliged to say to his

companion, when visitors asked his name, “For Heaven's sake, tell me

what I call myself!” Piorry mentions the case of an aged priest who

after right-sided paralysis lost entirely the use of substantives;

wishing to ask for his hat, the word _hat_ failed him utterly, and he

was obliged to express himself in the remaining parts of speech: “Give

me that which I place upon the {570} ——;” but the word _head_,

denoting the object most commonly in relation with the _hat_, was

wanting also. When either hat or head was mentioned he spoke the word

without difficulty.

Instances of failure in linguistic faculty are not uncommon. Witness a

case, reported by Proust, of an Italian who after long residence in

France, though understanding his native tongue, could speak only in

French. Cases in which after acute disease one language is gone

entirely while several others are retained are not wanting. A striking

case of amnesic alalia was that of Lordat, a French physician, who

thus described his malady: “I find myself deprived of the value of all

words. If any words remain to me, they become useless, because I can

no longer remember the manner in which I must co-ordinate them to

express my thoughts. I am conscious that I recognize all ideas, but my

memory does not suggest a word. In losing the memory of the meaning of

spoken words I have lost that of their visible signs.”

Fortunately, these cases are among the more tractable of cerebral

disorders. Bristowe has reported a case wherein elementary instruction

in speech-formation was tried with marked success. The patient, aged

thirty-six, after a violent cerebral disturbance without traumatism

became paraplegic, speechless, and deaf. Gradual recovery ensued

until, seven months after his first illness, he was admitted into St.

Thomas's Hospital in the following condition: Numbness and paresis in

left leg, less in left arm; special senses healthy; no incontinence;

some pain about head and neck; complete loss of speech. It was found

that the patient was very intelligent, wrote legibly, could make all

kinds of voluntary movements with lips, tongue, and teeth, and was

capable of vocal intonation; articulation alone was lacking.

The law of the evolution of language designates as primitive forms of

word-signs those words affirming qualities, while those denoting

relative positions are of secondary formation (Whitney.) Remembering,

also, the fact that amnesia in general “is a regression from the new

to the old, from the complex to the simple, from the voluntary to the

automatic, from the least organized to the best organized,”[1] we are

able to understand the cause of amnesic alalia, and also the steps of

the process of recovery, in which the inverse order is observed.

[Footnote 1: Ribot, _Diseases of Memory_.]

Amnesic alalia can hardly be regarded as susceptible of treatment

other than as a general neurasthenia. Though we may develop memory by

cultivating the association of ideas and by repetition, yet, regarding

it as a general function of the nervous system, it is evident that

recovery from its disorders is conditioned by the general vigor of the

nervous centres. A partial recovery usually occurs in such cases;

complete recovery is more infrequent.

Ataxic alalia, the failure of the motor powers of speech, occurs in

all forms of general paralysis, most typically in bulbar paralysis.

This disease is fully described in the standard works on neurology.

Ataxic alalia will also occur in disseminated sclerosis, posterior

spinal sclerosis, dementia paralytica, and cretinism. It forms in

general disorders an instructive symptom, and is to be distinguished

by a tremulous utterance and by facial spasm from the hesitation of

the stammerer and from the convulsive utterance of the stutterer.

{571} Paralalia embraces all abnormalities of speech, from trivial

mannerisms to difficulties in the utterance of certain letters,

including those painful defects which depend upon physical

malformations.

The free discussion of paralalia would cover the domain of elocution;

the physician is called upon to advise in those cases only where

either a physical malformation is evident or the difficulty

experienced by the patient in enunciating certain letters has led to a

suspicion of the existence of malformation. The former cases lie in

the province of the surgeon; the latter come within the scope of those

elocutionists, speech-trainers, and instructors who hope to cure

stammering and stuttering.

Discrimination between stammering and stuttering will give the

physician a basis for judgment from which he can reasonably offer

encouragement in many cases and avoid the creation of false hopes in

others. As a cardinal point of difference, it will be remarked that in

the case of the stutterer the muscles of phonation are thrown into a

state of spasm when speech is attempted, while in the stammerer their

movements are merely lacking in proper co-ordination. It may also be

observed that the respiration of the stammerer is marked by irregular

contractions of the diaphragm, which render the expiratory blast of

air irregular in its delivery. In the stutterer the spasm is

pronouncedly laryngeal and facial. The nervous embarrassment of the

stutterer is proverbial, and is increased by excitement, while a

moderate degree of excitement, stimulating respiration, greatly

improves the speech of the stammerer.

Whispering, a difficult respiratory act, exaggerates the stammerer's

fault, but the spasm of the stutterer is often relaxed by the

diminished pressure of whispered breath.

As articulation is effected by the larynx and the oral organs, the

stutterer makes his spasmodic articulation particularly noticeable,

while the stammerer finds little difficulty in the utterance of words.

_R_, _L_, _S_, and other letters whose enunciation demands the

continued expiratory blast, are imperfectly uttered by the stammerer,

while these letters when joined to a long vowel-sound occasion little

or no difficulty for the stutterer.

TREATMENT.—It follows that if stammering is recognized as

inco-ordinate enunciation, owing largely to irregular action of the

diaphragm, any training of the respiratory muscles which will ensure a

regular delivery of the expiratory air will improve this defect. It

follows, then, that the treatment of stammering resolves itself into

careful attention to general hygiene, associated with such persistent

respiratory and vocal gymnastics as shall effectually develop

regularity, depth, and co-ordination of action on the part of all the

muscles concerned in the act of respiration. Drugs will be of service

only as aids to the correction of errors in the essential

physiological functions. In the child the powers of imitation may be

enlisted to effect a cure, and the familiar fact that the habits of

childhood are easily formed would indicate this as the best time for

treatment.

Childhood once passed, however, the steadiness of purpose of the adult

is requisite to break up a confirmed habit, and active treatment

should be deferred until after adolescence. Most important in all

cases are judicious moral influences exerted by those about the

patient, the ridicule so often visited upon the unfortunate stammerer

being most harmful in its consequences. The many tricks and devices so

often employed in these {572} cases are of use simply by varying the

monotony of vocal drill; they may be employed or abandoned as the

judgment of the physician may dictate.

Regarding the prognosis in these cases, it follows that with a fairly

developed and healthful nervous system, reinforced by proper mental

and physical hygiene, the stammerer's case is far from hopeless in the

hands of a patient and intelligent physician.

An unfavorable prognosis would be demanded by hereditary defects and

vices of the nervous system, by the lack of general nervous vitality,

by enfeeblement of the will and the mental tone of the individual, by

advanced age, and by irremediable hygienic conditions. Under favorable

conditions recovery should be the rule.

DYSLALIA OR STUTTERING.—Recalling to mind the points of difference

between stuttering and stammering, it becomes evident that while the

prospect of success in the treatment of the stammerer is often

favorable, the case of the stutterer presents such difficulties as

render it too frequently hopeless.

We may liken the confirmed stutterer to those rare cases of chorea

which defy treatment, and to those cases of hereditary deterioration

of the nervous system where the most patient and painstaking care

fails to overcome the defect. The laryngeal and facial spasms depend

upon no malformation for their exciting cause; hence surgery fails to

remedy the defect. Drugs which are given with hope of invigorating the

nervous system have only a general tonic influence, while the motor

depressants and antispasmodics find but partial success. We must again

rely upon hygiene, and also upon those aids to enunciation which come

from rhythmical associated movements, such as stamping with the foot,

beating time with the hand, the employment of a sing-song tone, or

other modes of specially rhythmic enunciation. The sing-song mode of

utterance is a familiar resource with parents in attempting to aid a

stuttering child, and the measured forms of articulation offer the

only vocal drill that possesses any permanent value. It is especially

essential in the stutterer's case that the patient be protected from

ridicule and from all disturbing emotions: the burden of difficult

speech is sufficient to greatly depress the nervous system without the

added suffering of emotional distress. It is evident that childhood,

characterized as it is by especial instability of the nervous system,

is the period when we can hope for the best results from care and

training; the long-formed habits of the adult are rarely broken.

We have thus traced the disorders of speech to their origin as

symptoms of grave central lesions of the nervous system, as results of

heredity or of a general neurasthenic condition; very rarely are they

dependent upon malformations of the organs of speech.

The treatment of such malformations, when they occur, is largely

unsatisfactory and is seldom curative.

The thorough treatment of those speech disorders that are not

susceptible of surgical aid would embrace such mental and physical

hygiene and training as should ensure the formation of a thoroughly

conceived vocabulary and its co-ordinated expression by words either

spoken or written. The study of expression in its highest forms would

necessarily conduct the investigator far into the realm of the

plastic, harmonic, and literary arts.

{573}

ALCOHOLISM.

BY JAMES C. WILSON, M.D.

DEFINITION.—Alcoholism is the term used to designate collectively the

morbid phenomena caused by the abuse of alcohol.

SYNONYMS.—Alcoholismus, Ebrietas, Ebriositas, Temulentia, Drunkenness,

Delirium potatorium, Mania potatorium, Delirium tremens, Chronic

alcoholic intoxication, Dipsomania; _Ger._ Trunkenheit, Trunksucht;

_Fr._ Ivresse, Ivrognerie.

These terms are in common use to describe such conditions and

outbreaks in alcoholic individuals as amount to veritable morbid

states or attacks of sickness, but they are not interchangeable, nor

are they all sufficiently comprehensive to constitute true synonyms.

They are names applied to various conditions due to acute or chronic

alcohol-poisoning properly and distinctively comprehended under the

general term alcoholism.

CLASSIFICATION.—It was formerly the custom to restrict this term to

affections of the general nervous system induced by continued excesses

in the use of alcoholic drinks.[1] But the nervous system bears the

brunt of the attack and suffers beyond all others alike in transient

and in continued excesses. The artificial restriction of the term to

the cases caused by continued excesses was therefore illogical in

itself, and has been productive of much needless difficulty in the

treatment of the subject and in the classification of the cases. The

use of the term chronic alcoholism to denote an established condition,

and of acute alcoholism to describe outbreaks of various kinds which

occur in individuals subject to that condition, has also proved a

source of embarrassment to the student. Not less vague has been the

employment of such terms as delirium tremens, mania-a-potu, and the

like, which are unsatisfactory in themselves, and tend to exalt

symptoms at the expense of the morbid condition of which they are only

in part the manifestation. I am of the opinion—which is at variance

with established usage—that the systematic discussion of alcoholism

requires that all forms of sickness, including drunkenness, due to

that poison must receive due consideration, and that the term acute

alcoholism, hitherto used in a sense at once too comprehensive and too

variable, should be reserved for those cases in which the sudden

energetic action of the poison is the occasion of like sudden and

intense manifestations of its effects. Furthermore, the uncertainty

and lack of precision in the use of the terms acute and chronic

alcoholism are due to errors of theory formerly almost universal in

medical {574} writings and popular belief concerning the disease. The

chief source of these errors was the recognition only of the more

acute nervous affections caused by alcoholic excess—delirium tremens,

maniacal excitement, and terrifying hallucinations—and the belief that

these conditions occurred only after a temporary abstinence in the

course of habitual or prolonged indulgence. It has now long been known

that abstinence from drink by no means necessarily precedes the

outbreak of mania or delirium, and modern researches have established

the existence of a chronic alcoholic intoxication of long duration

extending over a period of months or years, in which such outbreaks

merely exhibit the full development of symptoms that have already been

occasionally and partially recognizable.

[Footnote 1: Anstie, _Reynolds's System of Medicine_, vol. ii., 1868.]

The following arrangement of the topics will facilitate the discussion

of the subject in the present article, and serve, I trust, a useful

purpose for the classification of cases in accordance with existing

knowledge:[2]

I. Acute Alcoholism: Drunkenness, Debauch.

A. Ordinary or Typical Form.

B. Irregular Forms.

1. Maniacal;

2. Convulsive;

3. In persons of unsound mind.

C. Acute Poisoning by Alcohol: Lethal doses.

II. Chronic Alcoholism.

A. Visceral Derangements.

1. Local disorders:

_a_. Of the digestive system;

_b_. Of the liver;

_c_. Of the respiratory system;

_d_. Of the circulatory system;

_e_. Genito-urinary system.

2. Disorders of special structures:

_a_. Of the locomotor apparatus;

_b_. Of the skin.

3. General disorders:

_a_. The blood;

_b_. Obesity;

_c_. Cachexia.

B. Derangements of the Nervous System: Cerebro-spinal Disorders.

1. Cerebral disorders.

2. Spinal disorders.

3. Disorders of the peripheral nerves.

4. Disorders of the special senses.

C. Psychical Derangements.

1. The moral sense.

2. The will.

3. The intellect.

4. Alcoholic delirium in general.

5. Delirium tremens.

6. Alcoholic insanity:

_a_. Melancholia;

_b_. Mania;

_c_. Chronic delirium;

_d_. Dementia;

_e_. Paretic dementia.

III. Hereditary Alcoholism.

IV. Dipsomania.

[Footnote 2: This classification is in part based upon that of Lentz,

_De l'Alcoholism et de ses Diverses manifestations, etc._, Bruxelles,

1884—a prize essay.]

A system of practical medicine. By American authors. Vol. 5 · 第 76 / 185 段