1. Not Ether; on account of the absence of scriptural statement.

We have demonstrated that the Sânkhya-system and other systems standing

outside the Veda are untenable since they rest on fallacious reasoning

and are self-contradictory. In order to prove that our own view is

altogether free from all objections of this kind, we shall now explain

in detail the mode in which this world, with all its sentient and non-

sentient beings, is produced by Brahman, whom we hold to be the general

creator.

The first doubt here presenting itself is whether Ether be something

produced or not.--The Pûrvapakshin maintains that it is not produced,

since there is no scriptural statement to that effect. A scriptural

statement may be expected with regard to what is possible; but what is

impossible--as e.g. the origination of a sky-flower or of Ether--cannot

possibly be taught by Scripture. For the origination of Ether, which is

not made up of parts and is all pervasive, cannot be imagined in any way.

For this very reason, i.e. the impossibility of the thing, the Chandogya,

in its account of creation, mentions the origination of fire, water, &c.

only (but not of Ether)--'It thought, may I be many, may I grow forth,'

'It sent forth fire,' and so on. When therefore the Taittirîya, the

Atharvana, and other texts tell us that Ether did originate--'From that

Self sprang Ether' (Taitt. Up. II, 1); 'From him is born breath, mind,

and all organs of sense, Ether, air, light, water,' &c. (Mu. Up. II, 1,

4)--such statements are contrary to sense, and hence refute themselves.--

To this the Sûtra replies.

The Vedanta-Sutras with the Commentary by Ramanuja Sacred Books of the East, Volume 48 · 第 165 / 339 题