The hieroglyphs stand thus:--

1 2 5 6 9 13

3 4 7 8 10 14

11 15

12 16.

Of these 3, 7, 11 and 15 are the sign for women, 2, 6, 10 and 14 are

likewise all the same sign, which is repeated in the same places on pages

17c to 18c. I do not understand its meaning; it may have reference merely

to the carrying-frame. Instead of the four women, whom we should expect to

find here, only the first two are portrayed. The first carries B, whose

sign is the first hieroglyph, while the fourth hieroglyph is the sign _q_.

The second woman carries A to whom hieroglyphs 5 and 8 refer. The third

woman would have carried D, which is plainly proved by hieroglyphs 9 and

12, and the fourth, F, as follows from sign 13 and probably also from 16

(_q_).

Pages 17b--18b.

Eb 11 7 6 16 8 4.

Kan

Cib

Lamat

Ahau.

Here again there are no red numerals.

Commentary on the Maya Manuscript in the Royal Public Library of Dresden · 第 34 / 105 题