I read it thus:--

III 3 VI 2 VIII 3 XI 4 II 4 VI 1 VII 7 I 2 III

Cauac

Chicchan

Chuen

Caban

Akbal

Muluc

Men

Imix

Manik

Ben.

Two figures and eight hieroglyphs are given here. I do not venture to

decide whether each of the two figures with its hieroglyphs relates only to

a period of 26 days or to the half of the whole, 130 days. I think the

latter is more likely to be the case. The sign Imix-Kan, which I am

inclined to refer to a sacrificial meal, is common to both groups and

connects them. The two gods seem also to have a sign pertaining to a meal

in their hands; this may be a cup.

The first deity is D or I, but with a female breast and with a serpent on

his head. His signs are 2 and 3. The second god is A with a snail on his

head and his signs are 6 and 7.

In addition to these, sign 4 of the first group is _v_ and sign 8 of the

second group is c.

Pages 10c--11c.

I 3 XIII 1 I 5 VI 10 III 13 III 15 V 8 (in error 9) XIII

Imix Cimi

Ben Ezanab

Chicchan Oc

Caban Ik

Muluc Ix.

Here we have two independent Tonalamatls as on page 12a. There are

subdivisions only for the second; the first should be regarded either as

entirely invalid or else its division has merely been omitted.

Commentary on the Maya Manuscript in the Royal Public Library of Dresden · 第 27 / 105 题