To the Editor of the "Agricultural Gazette."

You invite persons who have grown good crops of grain or turnips

to forward you the particulars. I therefore enclose you an account

of an attempt which I made to grow wheat on the same land year

after year, that account reaching to the fourth white crop in

1844. As I still continue the experiment, I shall be in a position

to continue the account up to the present time (as I am now

threshing out the last year's crop), and will send it to you if

you think it worthy of insertion in the "Agricultural Gazette."

If the account I now send is not worth inserting, please to send

it to your correspondent A. W., who doubted whether there were

authenticated instances of land producing eighty, seventy, or even

fifty bushels to the acre.

I attribute my success in growing wheat to the use of silicate of

soda, and yet, singularly enough, until now I have been unable to

induce anyone else to try it. This season, however, several

persons have applied to me to procure it for them. Among them is

the talented editor of the "Liverpool Times," whose farm at Barton

Moss shows what good management will accomplish on very

unpromising soils. If, as I hope will be the case, the silicate of

soda should supply to peat its greatest deficiency, no one will

more readily discover it than Mr. Baines.

In the use of silicates of soda and potash, one precaution is very

necessary, namely, that you really have a soluble silicate, not a

mere mechanical mixture of ground flint and alkali. This is a very

different thing, and one which, if it be not carefully guarded

against, will lead to nothing but disappointment.

Again, the silicate of soda may be properly made, in the first

instance, but in a long exposure to the atmosphere, the soda

attracts carbonic acid, and is liberated from the silex, and this

has disappointed my expectation more than once.

Again, though I consider it desirable to defer the application of

soluble silicates until vegetation has made a fair start in the

spring, yet in one instance I delayed the application of it so

long that there was not moisture to dissolve it until the end of

June, and then the plant began to send up suckers from the roots,

and the crop was seriously injured by it; but this was in an

exceedingly dry spring, and may not happen again for many years.

* * * * *

CLITHEROE, _March 7th_, 1848.

In continuing my attempts to grow wheat on the same land year

after year, I observed that the crop of 1845 was very seriously

injured by the deficient drainage--the old drains having been

destroyed by the subsoil plough. It was therefore necessary to

replace them; they were accordingly put in four feet deep. This

took up so much time, that the season for sowing wheat had gone

by, and the ground was cropped with potatoes, which were dug up in

September, and the wheat might have been got in early in October;

but seeing in your paper that sowing too early was not advisable,

and also being carried away by the arguments of the thin-seeders,

I deferred sowing until the middle of November, and also put in

little seed, and the weather proving very unfavourable when the

wheat was coming up, there was not half plant enough in the

spring, and I hesitated whether to plough up the ground or to

drill in barley. I determined to do the latter. It was put in on

the 18th April, and wheat and barley grew up together, and when

cut and threshed, it yielded 48 bushels to the acre.

* * * * *

Essays in Natural History and Agriculture · 第 28 / 65 题