Of buildings strong, albeit of paper hight,[A]

confronting with massy contrast the lighter, older, more fantastically

shrouded one named of Harcourt, with the cheerful Crown Office Row (place

of my kindly engendure), right opposite the stately stream which washes

the garden foot with her yet scarcely trade-polluted waters and seems but

just weaned from Twickenham Na?es! A man would give something to have been

born in such places. What a collegiate aspect has that fine Elizabethan

hall where the fountain plays which I have made to rise and fall how many

times, to the astonishment of the young urchins my contemporaries, who,

not being able to guess at its recondite machinery, were tempted to hail

the wondrous work as magic." Though its courts may have been "magnificent"

and "ample" to the contemplation of the kindly Lamb, they would scarce be

so accounted now.

[Footnote A: Paper Buildings.]

The "great Cham of Literature," Dr. Samuel Johnson, resided for some time

at No. 1, Inner Temple Lane. Indeed, it was while the doctor was living in

the Temple that the world-famous "Literary Club" was founded. The faithful

and receptive Boswell, too, as might be expected, lived within easy

distance of the object of his veneration, at the foot of Inner Temple

Lane. It was in 1763 that Boswell first made the acquaintance of the

"Great Bear" and called on him in his Temple chambers.

Cowper the poet, as the reader doubtless remembers, at first embraced the

law as his profession. He was duly articled to a solicitor of some

eminence; but with how little ardor he devoted himself to the study may be

inferred from the following candid confession: "I did actually live three

years with Mr. Chapman, a solicitor,--that is to say, I slept three years

in his house, but I lived, I spent my days, in Southampton Row. Here was I

and the future Lord Chancellor [Thurlow] constantly employed from morning

till night in giggling and making giggle instead of studying law." It is

not surprising, as one of his biographers remarks, that when, at the age

of twenty-one, he proudly became the occupant of a set of chambers in the

Middle Temple, "he neither sought business nor business sought him."

While domiciled here, the hideous malady which darkened his manhood began

to cast its gloomy pall on his mind. In the year 1759 he removed from the

Middle Temple to better quarters in the Inner Temple. For a time the

change seemed beneficial, but in 1763 what had hitherto been mere morbid

melancholy became something very near the dreaded insanity. "I was struck,

" he says, "not long after my settlement in the Temple, with such

dejection of spirits as none but they who have felt the same can have the

least conception of. Day and night I was upon the rack, lying down in

horror and rising up in despair." His residence at the Temple extended in

all through eleven years. The year above mentioned, the last of that term,

found the poet in straitened circumstances. The twin offices of

reading-clerk and clerk of committees in the House of Lords became vacant

at this juncture, and both were at the disposal of a cousin of Cowper's.

They were duly conferred on the poet. But the duties of these positions

necessitated frequent attendance before the Peers, and to one who suffered

from a morbid nervousness this prospect was most distasteful. Hence,

almost immediately after having accepted them, Cowper resigned these posts

and took instead that of clerk of the journals. Now another difficulty

intervened. It was necessary, in order to qualify for this place, that he

should undergo an examination at the bar of the House of Peers; and thus

"the evil from which he seemed to have escaped again met him."

"A thunderbolt," he writes, "would have been as welcome to me as this

intelligence. To require my attendance at the bar of the House, that I

might there publicly entitle myself to the office, was in effect to

exclude me from it. In the mean time, the interest of my friend, the honor

of his choice, my own reputation and circumstances, all urged me forward,

all urged me to undertake what I saw to be impracticable." The mental

agony he suffered was wellnigh unbearable. He even contemplated with some

calmness the coming of mental derangement, that thereby he might have good

reason for throwing up the appointment. He made many attempts to destroy

himself. "He purchased laudanum, but threw it away. He went down to the

Custom-House Quay to throw himself into the river. He tried to stab

himself." Finally, the most desperate attempt of all to extinguish the

lamp of life took place in his Temple chambers. Thrice he essayed to hang

himself by his garter,--first on his high canopy bedstead, and then on the

door.

The public way which, starting at Fleet Street, runs between the Temple

Church and Goldsmith Buildings, is a curious thoroughfare,--street it

cannot be called. It inclines somewhat toward the river, with a very

narrow foot-walk, scarcely wide enough for two to pass abreast. On one

side is the hoary sanctuary, and on the other a row of gloomy,

flat-fronted houses, whose dirty windows blink drowsily on the flagged way

beneath.

The pavement of a part of this thoroughfare is unique. It consists of old

tombstones. In 1842, the entire available space in the churchyard being

covered with graves, the benchers decided to permit no more interments

there, and ordered it to be paved over. A path now runs directly across

the old cemetery, where rest the bones of the Knights Templar and their

dependants, and many of the sculptured stones have become paving-flags.

Worn and polished by the passage of many feet, the epitaphs are entirely

defaced. Here and there a few letters of antique cut may with difficulty

be deciphered; but soon no sign will survive to tell of this painful

desecration.

A little outside the roadway the ground is slightly elevated, and near to,

but outside of, the gilt-tipped railings which enclose the Temple Church

lies a very unpretending slab of marble. Rising but a few inches above the

level, one corner sunken and green with earth-mould, it is but a single

remove from the general decay around it. No fence protects it, children

play and fight their mimic battles thereon, and when last we saw it a

group of workmen employed near by were discussing their noontide bread and

cheese and beer in various lounging attitudes upon it. The slab is sadly

chipped, yet it is not nearly so old as the years of the century. Surely

the man whose death it commemorates departed this life

Unwept, unhonored, and unsung.

Not so. Let us scrape aside the accumulated dirt, and trace with

finger-tip the fast-vanishing inscription. It says, "Here lies Oliver

Goldsmith." This, then, is the way the world reveres its great ones. Of

what avail a monument to the poet in Westminster Abbey, dignified by the

celebrated epitaph of Dr. Johnson, when his tomb is thus relegated to the

domain of neglect and oblivion? Even the site at present indicated is

"entirely conjectural:" the precise position of the poet's grave has been

long forgotten.

Goldsmith Buildings, of course, take their name from the erratic poet and

playwright. In one of them he lived and died, just above the rooms

tenanted by the learned Blackstone, who, at that time engaged in penning

the fourth volume of his "Commentaries," was often grievously annoyed by

the dancing- and drinking-parties, the games of blind-man's-buff, and the

noisy singing of "poor Noll" and his boon companions. Goldsmith took up

residence in the Temple in the spring of the year 1764, in a very shabby

set of rooms, which he shared with Jeffs, the butler of the society. Here

Dr. Johnson visited him, says Mr. Forster, "and on prying and peering

about in them after his short-sighted fashion, flattening his face against

every object be looked at, Goldsmith's uneasy sense of their deficiencies

broke out. 'I shall soon be in better chambers, sir, than these,' he said.

'Nay, sir,' answered Johnson, 'never mind that: _nil te quaesiveris

extra_.'"

In 1765, his purse having become somewhat more plethoric, he removed to

Garden Court, then, as now, one of the choice spots in the Temple Area.

Here he sported a man-servant, and ran head over ears in debt to his

trades-people. Three years later, in 1768, we find the happy-go-lucky

spendthrift squandering four hundred of the five hundred pounds which the

partial success of "The Good-Natured Man" netted him in the purchase of a

set of chambers in No. 2 Brick Court, much to the sorrow of the studious

Blackstone, whose fellow-tenant he thus became. The nocturnal revelries of

Goldy and his intimates are happily described in Mr. Forster's biography.

Supper-parties were frequent, "preceded by blind-man's-buff, forfeits, or

games of cards, when Goldsmith, festively entertaining them all, would

make frugal supper for himself off boiled milk." He would "sing all kinds

of Irish songs," and with special enjoyment "gave them the Scotch ballad

of 'Johnny Armstrong' (his old nurse's favorite);" with great cheerfulness

"he would put the front of his wig behind, or contribute in any other way

to the general amusement;" and to an "accompaniment of uncontrolled

laughter he once danced a minuet with Mrs. Seguin," the wife of an Irish

merchant.

A volume would not contain the thrilling story of the trials and triumphs,

the struggles and successes, of the dead-and-gone generations whose feet

have polished the cool gray flags of the purlieus of the Temple. Comedy

and tragedy have been enacted within its walls; penury and prodigality

have dwelt beneath the same rafters; the versatile genius and the plodding

dullard have taken their maiden flights toward fame in its halls. Soldiers

and statesmen, poets and playwrights, courtiers, wits, and adventurers,

have herein acted their various parts. Yet, despite the checkered lives

that have run their course within its pale, and notwithstanding the lustre

shed upon its history by the many great jurists nurtured there, the Temple

gains its greatest renown from the residence therein of that famous trio,

Johnson, Goldsmith, and Lamb.

The immortal pump, so often alluded to in the Temple annals, stands in the

centre of Hare Court,--not in Pump Court, as might not unreasonably be

expected. It yields a copious supply of the coolest spring-water, and the

office-lads of the surrounding chambers make many pilgrimages hither,

stone pitcher in hand, during the sultry summertime. Charles Lamb, in an

epistle to Coleridge, in his happiest vein, says, "I have been turned out

of my chambers in the Temple by a landlord who wanted them for himself;

but I have got others at No. 4, Inner Temple Lane, far more commodious and

roomy.... The rooms are delicious, and the best look backwards into Hare

Court, where there is a pump always going; just now it is dry. Hare

Court's trees come in at the window,--so that it's like living in a

garden." Again, writing from the Temple in 1810 to his friend Manning, who

is in China, Lamb says, "The household gods are slow to come, but here I

mean to live and die. Come, and bring any of your friends the mandarins

with you. My best room commands a court in which are trees and a pump, the

water of which is excellent cold--with brandy, and not very insipid

without." At about the same time we find Mary Lamb recording that her

genial brother had suddenly taken to living like an anchorite. He tabooed

all alcoholic drinks, and confined himself to cold water and cold tea. But

the beverage drawn from Hare Court did not agree with his internal

economy: he suffered in consequence from cramps and rheumatism, and his

abstention from generous fluids was, we are forced to infer, exceedingly

brief.

The poet Garth, who exposed the apothecaries of London to reprobation and

ridicule in his satirical poem "The Dispensary," also humorously alludes

to Hare Court's pump:

And dare the college insolently aim

To equal our fraternity in fame?

Then let crabs' eyes with pearls for virtue try,

Or Highgate Hill with lofty Pindus vie;

So glowworms may compare with Titan's beams,

And Hare Court pump with Aganippe's streams.

The one structure in the Temple area that overshadows all others in point

of interest is the famous round church, consecrated to St. Mary by

Heraclius, Patriarch of Jerusalem, in the year 1185. This prelate's

presence in England was on an errand to invoke the assistance of Henry II.

against Saladin, who had recently inflicted several disastrous defeats on

the Templars in the Holy Land.

The church was finished about 1240. It is one of the four round churches

still remaining in England. Its plan is that of a central round tower,

supported by six beautiful clustered columns, crossed by a nave and

transepts. Notwithstanding the lapse of ages, and although its beauties

were for centuries hidden beneath a variety of hideous excrescences, it

remains to-day one of the best specimens of early Gothic architecture

extant. In 1682, 1695, 1706, 1737, and 1811 extensive repairs were made.

In 1828 the exterior was thoroughly restored and recased with stone, and

several unsightly structures that impeded the view of the church were

removed. All of these so-called restorations were, however, but partial in

extent. Many outrageous additions and much meretricious ornamentation,

added at various epochs, were allowed to remain.

Finally, in 1845, steps were taken looking to a thorough renovation and

restoration of the venerable pile. The purity of the marble columns had

been sullied by several coats of paint and whitewash, while many of the

foliated capitals of the columns supporting the "Round" bore traces of

gilding. These latter were scraped and cleaned; an eight-feet-high oak

wainscot was removed; light, movable seats were substituted for the heavy

pews of Charles II.'s time that encumbered the Round; the pavement was

lowered to its original level, thus revealing the bases of the columns;

the organ (built by the famous Father Smith in the reign of Charles II.)

was removed to its present position in the choir, and the whole interior,

by means of these and other extensive changes, was exhibited in its

pristine purity.

It is difficult to understand the crass stupidity which blocked up

exquisite Norman windows, covered carved capitals with a thick coat of

cement, closed many of the arches with wooden partitions, planted a

cumbrous pulpit and reading-desk immediately under the dome, and hid the

noble groined ceiling behind a shell of flat, whitewashed boarding. In the

course of these repairs much of the marble-work was found to require

renewal, for replacing which some old quarries in the Isle of Purbeck,

unworked for generations, were reopened.

On the pavement, immediately under the Round, are several marble effigies

of mail-clad knights,--"Associates of the Temple." Those that have been

identified represent Geoffry de Magnaville, Earl of Essex, one of the

barons who fought against King Stephen; another, having clean-cut features

and clad in chain-armor, commemorates William Marshall, who was Protector

during the reign of Henry III,; and by his side rests his son, a leader of

the Barons in their memorable struggle against King John. The effigy of

Gilbert Marshall, third son of the Protector, reposes near the western

door-way, and hard by is the figure of a warrior in the act of prayer,

supposed to be intended for Robert, Lord of Ros. Five or six other figures,

some of remarkable beauty, and all in good preservation, two of heroic

stature, are unidentified.

Service is held daily in the Temple Church, and admission is practically

free. On Sunday mornings, however, the introduction of a bencher is

requisite to secure admittance. The music is of the best of its kind, and

the organ, though of great age, is renowned as one of the purest-and

sweetest-toned instruments in London.

No account of the Temple would be complete without some mention of its

many curious sundials. Each garden possesses a plain pillar-dial. There is

one in Temple Lane with the motto, "_Pereunt et imputantur_," and

"_Vestigia nulla retrorsum_" appears on another in Essex Court. In Pump

Court, high up on the front of a house is a large, rectangular dial, with

gilt figures and stile, bearing the inscription, "Shadows we are and like

shadows depart." Over the dial is the traditional Temple lamb bearing a

cross.[A] In Brick Court there is a dial with the apt legend, "Time and

tide tarry for no man." In the year 1828 an ancient building on Inner

Temple Terrace was demolished, and with it a sundial bearing the strange

but not inappropriate inscription, "Begone about your business." The story

runs that, many years before, a crusty old bencher had promised the

dial-maker to provide a motto for the then new dial. The messenger,

however, arrived at an inopportune time, received the above curt dismissal

in answer to his request, and conveyed it to his master as the legend to

be engraved.

[Footnote A: The devices of the Middle and Inner Temple are a lamb and a

horse respectively, and they may be frequently seen blazoned on window and

wall. An irreverent wit once scrawled these lines on the Temple gate:

As by the Templars' hold you go,

The horse and lamb displayed

In emblematic figures show

The merits of their trade.

The clients may infer from thence

How just is their profession:

The lamb sets forth their innocence,

The horse their expedition.

O happy Britons, happy isle,

Let foreign nations say,

Where you get justice without guile,

And law without delay!

In answer and in ridicule of which, a second scribbler penned the

following stanzas beneath:

Deluded men, these holds forego,

Nor trust such cunning elves:

These artful emblems tend to show

Their _clients_, not _themselves_.

'Tis all a trick; these are all shams

By which they mean to cheat you:

But have a care,--for you're the lambs,

And they the wolves that eat you.

Nor let the thought of "no delay"

To these their courts misguide you:

'Tis you're the showy horse, and they

The jockeys that will ride you.]

The din and devastation of civil strife and the smoke and flame of

conflagration have more than once surged high and furious in and around

the Temple. In Wat Tyler's rebellion many of the houses were razed by the

rioters, books and parchments were carried away and fed to bonfires, and

it was the intention of the rebels to destroy the precinct and the lawyers

together, for thus, they said, they would obliterate both unjust laws and

corrupt law-makers. The "No-Popery" rioters in 1780 marched to attack the

Temple, but were awed into flight by the apparently determined front

presented by the lawyers and students, who were really in desperate fear

themselves. Street-fights with the lawless Alsatians of the adjoining

Whitefriars region were at one time frequent.[B] In 1553, and again in

1669, the mayor of the city essayed to "pass through the cloisters with

drawn sword." The Temple claimed immunity from civic control, and on both

occasions the mayor's weapon was beaten down and a bloody affray resulted.

An appeal growing out of this event was made to Charles II. by Heneage

Finch in behalf of the Temple, but the question is still unsettled. Hence

the modern Templars close their gates at ten o'clock every night, and when

the "charity children" of the adjacent parishes "beat the bounds" on

Ascension Day, redouble their vigilance. The rich rental of the property

pays no local taxes, though repeated efforts have been made to assess it.

[Footnote B: Salisbury Court, Whitefriars, enjoyed for centuries the

privilege of a sanctuary--at first for criminals, but finally for debtors

only--until 1697, when it was abolished by royal warrant. It was nicknamed

"Alsatia," in imitation of the frontier province of the same name, which

was long a cause of contention and familiarly known to English soldiers in

the long Continental wars. As Cunningham observes, "In the Temple students

were trying to keep the law, and in Alsatia, adjoining, debtors to avoid

and violate it. The Alsatians were troublesome neighbors to the Templars,

and the Templars as troublesome neighbors to the Alsatians."]

In 1666 the Great Fire of London burnt its way westward as far as the

Temple. After consuming several sets of chambers and a quantity of

title-deeds to many valuable estates, the course of the flames was stayed

just east of the Temple Church. But in 1678-79, in the mouth of January, a

large area was burned over. The fire lasted from midnight till noon of the

ensuing day. Pump Court, Vine Court, part of Brick Court, Elm-Tree Court,

Hare Court, part of Middle Temple Hall, a portion of Inner Temple Hall,

and the old cloisters, were swept away. The season was remarkable for its

severity: the Thames was frozen over, and the supply of water entirely

inadequate. So great hogsheads of ale were hoisted up from the cellars and

the liquor fed to the clumsy hand-engines of the period. When the ale gave

out, recourse was had to gunpowder,--buildings in the track of the flames

being blown up; but in this dangerous work the Temple library was

demolished. In the end, however, the Temple was the gainer by this fire:

much better structures took the place of the old rookeries, and the entire

precinct was purified.

Around the hoary walls of the Temple cluster memories of many a strange

custom or quaint observance. The revels at Yule-tide, St. Stephen's Day,

New Year's Day, and Twelfth Night were not surpassed anywhere in "merrie

England." Feasts, masques, and play-acting at various times greatly

scandalized the more sober and staid among the benchers. Stowe tells us

that the readers of his day "for upwards of three weeks kept a splendid

table, feasting the nobility, judges, bishops, principal officers of state,

and sometimes the king himself, insomuch that it has cost a reader above

one thousand pounds,"--a mint of money in those frugal days. Revelries

grew in frequency and attractiveness as the business of instruction

declined, so much so that we are compelled to believe that at one period

the qualifications for admission were merely nominal. A banquet given by

Sir Heneage Finch the year following the restoration of Charles II. lasted

from the 4th to the 17th of August, and all London was invited and made

welcome.

In one point the Templars of to-day are not a whit behind their

predecessors: they give good dinners. For centuries the benchers of the

two societies have dined in each other's company once a year in the great

hall; and to Mr. Thornbury we are indebted for the following description

of a Temple dinner of to-day:

"An Inner Temple banquet is a very grand thing. At five or half-past five

the barristers and students in their gowns follow the benchers in

procession to the dais; the steward strikes the table solemnly a mystic

three times; grace is said by the treasurer or senior bencher present, and

the men of law fall to. In former times it was the custom to blow a horn

in every court to announce the meal. The benchers observe somewhat more

style at their table than the other members do at theirs. The general

repast is a tureen of soup, a joint of meat, a tart, and cheese to each

mess, consisting of four persons, and each mess is allowed a bottle of

port wine. Dinner is served daily to the members of the Inn during

term-time,--the masters of the bench dining on the dais, and the

barristers and students at long tables extending down the hall. On grand

days the judges are present, who dine in succession with each of the four

Inns of Court. To the parliament chamber, adjoining the hall, the benchers

repair after dinner. The 'loving-cups' used on certain grand occasions are

huge silver goblets, which are passed down the table filled with a

delicious composition, immemorially termed 'sack,' consisting of sweetened

and exquisitely flavored white wine. The butler attends the progress of

the cup to replenish it, and each student is by rule restricted to a sip;

yet it is recorded that once, though the number present fell short of

seventy, thirty-six quarts of the liquid were sipped away. At the Inner

Temple, on May 29, a gold cup of sack is handed to each member, who drinks

to the happy restoration of Charles II."

The Temple has been for generations a favorite abode with men of letters

and others having no leaning toward or connection with the bar. It is a

vast bachelors' hall. Fleet Street and its immediate vicinity is the

centre of the publishing interest of London. Here many of the great

dailies are edited and printed, and "Brain Street," as George Augustus

Sala fitly nicknamed it, is midway between the "city" and the "West End,

"--the "down town" and the "up town" of London, if such a simile is

permissible as applied to a brick-and-mortar polypus whose members radiate

toward every point of the compass. No part of the Temple is more than five

minutes' walk from this centre of intellectual industry, and yet, once

within its walls, the silence and seclusion are complete. The roar and

rattle of Fleet Street and the Strand might be a thousand miles away, for

scarce a murmur penetrates beyond the Temple gates. The quiet, stone-paved

courts, the grassy nooks gemmed with a few choice blossoms, the

soft-plashing fountains, overshadowed by sturdy elm-, plane-, or fig-trees,

the cool stone archways leading from one court to another, the park-like

expanse of the Temple Garden, bounded by the bustling Embankment and the

swift-flowing river, are surroundings favorable alike to the labors of a

busy journalist, to the novelist's weavings of fiction, to the poet's

subtile creations, to the purposeful studies of the patient scholar, or to

the objectless dreamings of the mere "man about town."

Lippincott's Magazine Of Popular Literature And Science, Old Series, Vol. 36—New Series, Vol. 10, July 1885 · 第 9 / 40 题