When the block system is not used, it is quite common to protect

particularly dangerous points, such as curves and deep cuts, by

stationing watchmen there with flags or with some form of fixed

signal. The watchman can notify an approaching engine-runner that

a preceding train has or has not passed beyond his own range of

vision; or can notify him that it has been gone a certain time.

Travellers by the Philadelphia & Reading must have noticed the

queer structures, with revolving vanes on top, looking like a

feeble sort of windmill, which appear in positions to command a

view of cuts, curves, etc. These are examples of the devices for

local protection. The non-automatic block signal develops naturally

from the protection of scattered points. Instead of placing

watchmen at points of especial danger, they are placed at regular

intervals of one mile, two miles, or five miles. Instead of the

watchman looking to see that a train has disappeared from his field

of vision before he lets another train pass, he uses the eyes of

the next watchman ahead, who telegraphs back that the train has

passed his station. Suppose A, B, and C to be three block-signal

stations placed at intervals of two miles. When a train passes A,

the operator at that point at once puts a signal to danger behind

it. This signal stands at danger until the train passes B, and

the operator puts his signal to danger, and telegraphs back to A

to announce that train No. 1 has passed out of the block A B, and

is protected by the signal at B. Then, and not until then, the

operator clears the signal at A and allows train No. 2 to enter

the block. Meanwhile train No. 1 is proceeding through the block

B C, its rear protected at B; and the same sequence of events

happens when it arrives at C as happened at B. This is the simplest

form of block signalling. In the more elaborate form there are at

each block-station three signals--the distant, the home, and the

starting. The signals are often electrically interlocked, from

one station to another, in such a way that it is mechanically

impossible for the operator at A to give a signal for a train to

pass that station until the signal at B has been put to danger

behind the preceding train.

A B C

-----------------------------

It is seen that no two trains can be in the same block and on the

same track at the same time. If all run at a uniform speed, they

will be kept just the length of a block apart. If No. 2 is faster

than No. 1, it will arrive at B before No. 1 gets to C, but will

have to wait there. The block system, therefore, while it gives

security, does not always facilitate traffic. The longer the blocks

the greater will be the delay to trains; but the shorter the

blocks, the greater the cost of establishment, maintenance, and

operation.

Various systems have been contrived to have block signals displayed

automatically by the passage of trains. This, if it can be done

reliably, will do away with the wages of part of the operators, and

will also eliminate the dangers arising from human carelessness.

But there are very great objections to relying solely upon the

automatic action of signals, and automatic block signals are little

used except as auxiliary to a system employing operators also.

So used, they are of decided advantage, as they make sure that a

danger signal is set behind every train in spite of the operator,

and that it cannot be again set to the all-clear position till the

train has passed out of the block. All this is accomplished by

electricity.

Brakes, interlocking, and the apparatus of signalling have been

considered at length because they are very much the most important

of all the appliances which go to increase the safety of operating

railroads. They act chiefly to prevent collisions, but often

prevent or mitigate accidents from derailments and other causes.

Of all train-accidents happening in the last sixteen years, over

one-third have been from collisions, and more than one-half from

derailments.

* * * * *

[Illustration: Crossing Gates worked by Mechanical Connection from

the Cabin.]

After brakes and signals, the devices next in importance as means

of saving life are those for the protection of highway crossings

at the grade of railroads. In years to come, as wealth increases

and as traffic becomes more crowded, we may suppose there will

be few such crossings; but their abolition must be slow, and

meantime the loss of life at them is great. The most accurate and

complete statistics bearing on this matter are those collected

by the Railroad Commissioners of Massachusetts. In 1888, of all

those killed in the operation of the railroads of the State, seven

per cent. were passengers, thirty-three per cent. were employees,

and sixty per cent. were others. The others include trespassers,

forty-seven per cent.; and killed at grade crossings, eleven per

cent. More trespassers were killed than any other class; but the

deaths at highway crossings considerably exceeded those among

passengers. The difficulty of preventing this class of accidents

is strikingly shown by the fact that, of all crossing accidents,

forty-two per cent. were due to the victims' disregard of warnings

given by closed gates or flags. It is evident that the efforts of

the railroad companies to save people's lives at crossings are

largely nullified by the carelessness of the public, and the lack

of proper laws to punish those who venture upon railroad tracks

when they should keep off them. Still, it remains the duty and

the policy of the railroads to protect street crossings by all

practicable means. The best protection is afforded by gates with

watchmen, and of all forms of gate the most common, because it

is the simplest and most convenient to operate, is the familiar

arm-gate. This is usually worked by a man turning a crank, but it

is also worked by compressed air. On this page is shown a group of

gates worked from an elevated cabin by a mechanical connection. A

bell fixed at a crossing, to be rung by an approaching train, is a

very useful auxiliary to gates and to watchmen with flags, and is

considerably used where the traffic does not warrant the expense

of maintaining a watchman. There are several good devices of this

sort, either electric or magneto-electric. One of the latter class

has a lever alongside the rail, which is depressed by each wheel

that passes over it. This lever is geared to a fly-wheel, which

is set rapidly revolving and causes an armature to revolve in the

field of a magnet, and thus generates a current and rings a gong,

precisely as is done with the familiar magnetic bell used with the

telephone.

[Illustration: Some Results of a Butting Collision--Baggage and

Passenger Cars Telescoped.]

[Illustration: Wreck at a Bridge.]

About thirteen per cent. of the train-accidents in the United

States, in the last sixteen years, were derailments due to defects

of road. These include not only defective rails, switches, and

frogs, but bridge wrecks. There are, however, few devices used in

the track, other than those already mentioned, that can be called

safety appliances. This class of accidents is to be provided

against only by good material, good workmanship, and unceasing

care. Many so-called safety switches and safety frogs are offered

to railroad officers, but those actually in wide use are confined

to a very few standard forms. The split-switch, which is shown in

the engravings on pages 206 and 207, has gradually replaced the old

stub-switch, as well as most of the "safety" switches that have

been from time to time introduced; although the stub-switch is

still in considerable use in yards where movements are slow, and

in the main tracks of the less progressive roads. It consists of a

pair of moving rails the ends of which are brought opposite to the

ends of the main-line rails, or to those of the turnout, as the

case may be. It follows that but one of these tracks is continuous

at any one time, and a train reaching the switch by the other

track must be derailed. The distressing accident which happened at

Rio, Wis., in 1886, where seventeen people lost their lives, was

a derailment of this sort. Since that time the railroad on which

the accident happened has taken out all stub-switches on thousands

of miles of main-line track. The split-switch provides against

such derailments, for if the switch is set for the turnout, and a

train approaches it from the main line in the "trailing" direction,

the flanges of the wheels move the switch-rails to make the track

continuous. The terms "facing" and "trailing," as applied to

switches, are almost self-explanatory. If a train approaches toward

the points of the moving rails, the switch is said to be facing. If

it runs through the switch from the rear of the moving rails, the

switch is said to be trailing. This will be made clear by reference

to the illustration on page 206. If a train were coming from the

bridge, the first switch reached by it would be a trailing and

the second a facing switch. In the newspaper reports an accident

will very often be assigned to one of two causes, failure of the

air-brakes or spreading of the rails. The chances are that it will

be found on investigation to be due to neither of these causes.

Those interested to maintain the credit of the air-brake or of the

track department are not often on the ground when the reporter

gets his information, and the temptation is always great to shift

the responsibility to the shoulders of the absent. Probably

the displacement of the rail will have taken place after the

derailment; but rails do sometimes spread. Loose spikes and rotten

ties allow the outer edge of the rail-flange to sink into the wood,

and the rail to roll outward enough to let the wheels drop. Sound

ties are the first safeguard against such accidents. Metal plates

under the rails are useful also; but one of the most efficient

means of preventing displacement of the rails is the interlocking

bolt shown above. These bolts cross in the timber, and slots cut

in the two bolts engage with each other in such a way that when

the nuts are screwed down on the rail-flange it is impossible to

pull the bolts out. They can only be moved by tearing through the

wood contained in the angle between them. This bolt is much used

on bridges and trestles, where it is of vital importance that the

rails should be held in place and no part of the floor broken.

[Illustration: New South Norwalk Drawbridge. Rails held by safety

bolts.]

In 1853 an express train went through an open draw at South

Norwalk, Conn., and forty-six lives were lost. This, one of the

most serious railroad accidents that ever happened, is still

remembered as an historical calamity. The bridge which stands on

the same site is shown opposite. In May, 1888, a west-bound express

train, consisting of an engine and seven cars, was derailed just as

it was entering the draw-span. The train ran three hundred feet on

the sleepers before it was stopped. Then it was found that all of

the driving-wheels of the engine had regained the rails, but all

the other wheels were off, except those of two sleeping-cars in the

rear. This was a remarkable escape from a bad accident, and much

of the credit of it has been given to the interlocking bolts with

which the rails were fastened. They are supposed to have prevented

the rails being crowded aside, and thus to have made possible the

rerailing of the engine. Besides, they helped the oak guard-timbers

to hold the ties in place. The destruction of a bridge in an

accident frequently begins by the ties bunching in front of the

wheels and allowing the wheels to drop through and strike the

floor-beams below. For this reason guard-timbers, notched down over

the ties, should always be used.

[Illustration: Engines Wrecked during the Great Wabash Strike.]

The traveller will have noticed, on all bridges of various roads,

two rails placed inside the track-rails, and curved to meet in

a point at either end of the bridge. These are known as inside

guard-rails, and their function is to keep derailed trucks in line

till the train can be stopped. Besides the bunching of the ties,

there is danger in a bridge derailment that a truck may swing

around and strike one of the trusses. Then the bridge is very

likely to be wrecked. A further provision for the protection of

bridges is the rerailing frog invented by the late Charles Latimer,

whose name is dear to railroad men all over America. This consists

of a pair of castings combined with inside guard-rails, designed

to raise the derailed wheels and guide them on to the rails. There

is no doubt that it has prevented several wrecks, although it has

never been widely used. The subject of bridges should not be left

without a word of explanation of the stout timber-posts often seen

at either end placed in line with the trusses. These are designed

to stop any derailed vehicle which might otherwise strike against

and destroy a truss.

* * * * *

There is one track-fixture that has no duty or value except as

it promotes safety. It helps only one humble class of railroad

employees. That device is the foot-guard. At all places where two

rails cross or approach each other, as at frogs and guard-rails,

dangerous boot-jacks are formed by the rail-heads. The overhang of

the heads of the rail makes it easy for one to so fasten his foot

in one of those boot-jacks that it is hard to get it out. If a man

finds himself in this position in front of an approaching train, he

sometimes has the alternative of standing up to be struck by the

engine or lying down and having his foot cut off. Fortunately this

class of accidents is comparatively rare; probably not more than

two or three per cent. of all deaths and injuries to passengers

and employees is caused in this way. Nevertheless, the means of

guarding against accidents of this class is so cheap that it should

be more generally adopted than it is. It consists simply in partly

filling the space between the rail-heads by putting in wooden

blocks or strips of metal, or even packing with cinders, gravel, or

any sort of ballast. Various wooden and metal foot-guards have been

patented. They are all too simple to require description.

* * * * *

[Illustration: Link-and-pin Coupler.]

Of all accidents to employees the most numerous are those which

arise in coupling and uncoupling cars. In Massachusetts, in 1888,

the employees killed and injured were 391; of these casualties

154 occurred in coupling accidents. The commissioners of other

States, especially of Iowa, have for years published statistics

showing nearly the same ratio. Fortunately accidents of this class,

although numerous, are not proportionately fatal. Far the greater

part of them result in the loss of part of a hand; but they are

so frequent as to have caused much discussion, legislation, and

invention. Several States have, one time and another, passed laws

requiring the use of automatic couplers; and two or three years

ago there were on record in the United States over four thousand

coupler patents. The laws have been futile because impracticable;

and most of the patents have been worthless for the same reason.

It was obvious that the business of supplying couplers for the

one million freight cars of the country could not be put into

the hands of some one patentee unless his device was manifestly

and pre-eminently superior to all others. It became important,

therefore, to select as a standard some type of coupler general

enough to include the patents of various men, and at the same time

so definite that all couplers made to conform to the standard

could work together interchangeably. Those who read Mr. Voorhees'

story[21] of the wanderings of a freight car will understand

that any one freight car in the United States or Canada should

be prepared to run in the same train with any other car. A few

years ago a committee of the Master Car-builders' Association was

appointed to choose and recommend a type of coupler to be adopted

as the standard of the association. After prolonged and careful

study of the subject, the committee recommended the type of which

the Janney is the best known example, and that has now become the

standard of the association. This action does not give a monopoly

to the Janney company, as there are already half a dozen couplers

which conform to the type. This coupler is shown by diagrams in the

article by M. N. Forney, page 142. A perspective view is herewith

given. This device couples automatically, and thus does away with

the necessity for the brakeman going between the cars. It can also

be unlocked by the rod shown extending to the side of the car,

and the locking device can be set not to couple, to facilitate

switching and yard work. The mechanical principles of this coupler

are a great and important improvement upon any form of link-and-pin

coupler; and the coupler question has now come to this point: A

type of coupler has been selected by a technical body representing

most of the railroads of the United States. It is general enough to

avoid the evils of a patent monopoly. It promises to be economical

in operation, and will certainly do away with the terrible loss

of life and limb which results from the use of the non-automatic

coupler. The railroads are adopting it with reasonable speed,

perhaps, but not as rapidly as simple considerations of humanity

would dictate.

[Illustration: Janney Automatic Coupler applied to a Freight Car.]

Closely related to the coupler is the vestibule, which within

the last two years has become so fashionable. The vestibule

is not merely a luxury, but has a certain value as a safety

device.[22] The full measure of this value has not yet been proved.

Occasionally lives are lost by passengers falling from or being

blown from the platforms of moving trains. Such accidents the

vestibule will prevent, and, further, it decreases the oscillation

of the cars, and thus to some degree helps to prevent derailment.

It is also some protection against telescoping. A few months ago a

coal train on a double-track road was derailed, and four cars were

thrown across in front of a solid vestibule train of seven Pullman

cars approaching on the other track. The engine of the vestibuled

train was completely wrecked. Even the sheet-iron jacket was

stripped off it. The engineer and fireman were instantly killed,

but not another person on the train was injured. They escaped

partly because the cars were strong, and partly, doubtless, because

the vestibules helped to keep the platforms on the same level and

in line, and thus to prevent crushing of the ends of the cars.

[Illustration: Signals at Night.]

The number of passengers burned in wrecks is greatly exaggerated

in the public mind; but that fate is so horrible that it is

not wonderful that "the deadly car-stove" should be the object

of persistent and energetic attacks by the press and in State

legislatures. The result has been the development, in the last

three years, of the entirely new business of inventing and

trying to sell systems of heating by steam or hot water from the

locomotive, and even by electricity. In fact, the manufacture of

such apparatus has already become an industry of some importance,

several thousand cars being equipped with it. This whole matter

of steam-heating is still in a somewhat crude state, and it

does not seem desirable to force it by legislation. It has been

demonstrated that it is the cheapest way of heating trains, and the

most easily regulated; and it has become a good advertisement to

attract passengers. Consequently the whole subject may be safely

left in the hands of the railroad companies, and allowed to develop

itself naturally in a business way. There is not yet any system

of continuous heating so perfected that a railroad company could

without hardship be compelled to adopt it for all its passenger

equipment.

Fires in wrecked trains have originated probably quite as often

from kerosene lamps as from the stoves. The danger of fire from

this source, and the desire to give passengers the luxury of

sufficient light, have led to methods of lighting by gas and,

more recently by electricity. Lighting by compressed gas ceased

years ago to be an experiment. In Germany it is almost universal,

but in this country it has been brought into use very slowly. The

system is almost absolutely safe, not unreasonably expensive, and

may be made to give satisfactory and even brilliant illumination;

but the ideal light for railroad trains will probably be found in

electricity. It is even safer than gas, and is the most adaptable

of any known method of lighting. Some sleeping-cars that have

been recently put in service on the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul

Railway are provided with small electric lamps in the sides of the

car, between each two adjoining seats, so that the occupants can

read comfortably either when sitting in their seats or lying in

their berths.

* * * * *

It is not to be supposed that so large a subject as that of safety

appliances can be exhaustively treated within the limits of one

article. It has been thought best, therefore, to give most of the

space available to the two or three devices of greatest and most

useful application. There remain various others that are in daily

use, and that have important offices, which have not even been

mentioned. If the reader has gleaned from these very incomplete

notes some clearer notions than he had before of the means by which

the power of the locomotive is guided into safe and useful paths,

the writer's object has been accomplished.

FOOTNOTES:

[20] The statistics of train accidents used in this article are

those collected and published monthly for many years by the

_Railroad Gazette_. In the nature of things such statistics cannot

be absolutely accurate, but no others are in existence for the

whole country. These are sufficiently accurate for all practical

purposes.

[21] See "The Freight-car Service," page 267.

[22] See "Railway Passenger Travel," page 249.

RAILWAY PASSENGER TRAVEL.

BY HORACE PORTER.

The Earliest Railway Passenger Advertisement--The First

Time-table Published in America--The Mohawk and Hudson

Train--Survival of Stage-coach Terms in English Railway

Nomenclature--Simon Cameron's Rash Prediction--Discomforts

of Early Cars--Introduction of Air-brakes, Patent Buffers

and Couplers, the Bell-cord, and Interlocking Switches--The

First Sleeping-cars--Mr. Pullman's Experiments--The

"Pioneer"--Introduction of Parlor and Drawing-room

Cars--The Demand for Dining-cars--Ingenious Devices for

Heating Cars--Origin of Vestibule-cars--An Important Safety

Appliance--The Luxuries of a Limited Express--Fast Time in

America and England--Sleeping-cars for Immigrants--The Village

of Pullman--The Largest Car-works in the World--Baggage-checks

and Coupon Tickets--Conveniences in a Modern Depot--Statistics

in Regard to Accidents--Proportion of Passengers in Various

Classes--Comparison of Rates in the Leading Countries of the

World.

The American Railway: Its Construction, Development, Management, and Appliances · 第 15 / 33 段