[1] It is proper here to say that English engineers now appreciate

the merits of the American swivelling truck or bogie. In the

article on Railways in the last edition of the "Encyclopædia

Britannica," speaking of locomotives, the author of the article,

who is an English engineer of high authority, says: "American

practice, many years since, arrived at two leading types of

locomotive for passenger, and for goods traffic. The passenger

locomotive has eight wheels, of which four in front are framed in

a bogie, and the four wheels behind are coupled drivers. _This is

the type to which English practice has been approximating._" The

italics are ours.

[2] The statistics of ten leading English and ten leading American

lines, given by Dorsey, show the following results: 1. The cost

per year of the rations, wages, fuel of an American locomotive

is $5,590; of an English locomotive, $3,080. 2. Average yearly

number of train-miles run by American locomotive, 23,928; English

locomotive, 17,539. 3. Yearly earnings: American locomotive,

$14,860; English locomotive, $10,940, although the English freight

charges are much greater than those of the United States.

[3] The writer has obtained many of the statistics used in this

article from A. M. Wellington's "Economic Theory of Railway

Location," a perfect mine of valuable information upon all such

matters.

[4] The amount of permanent wood and iron truss bridges, and of

temporary wooden trestles on the Chicago, Milwaukee, and St. Paul

is as follows:

Truss bridges, 700 spans, average 93 feet, 12-4/5 miles.

Trestle " 7,196 " " 77 " 103-1/10 "

------ --------

Total, 7,896 115-9/10 "

The approximate total number of bridges in the United States was in

1888:

Iron and wood truss bridges, 61,562 spans, 1,086 miles.

Wooden trestles, 147,187 2,127 "

-------- ------

Total, 208,749 3,213 "

Probably three-fourths of the truss bridges are now of iron

or steel, and may be considered perfectly safe so long as the

trains remain upon the rails and do not strike the side trusses.

The wooden trestles are a constant source of danger from decay

or burning or from derailed trains, and should be replaced by

permanent structures as fast as time and money will allow.

[5] See following article on "Feats of Railroad Engineering," page

86.

[6] For fuller description of work in a caisson see "Feats of

Railway Engineering," page 69.

[7] See "Feats of Railway Engineering," page 55.

FEATS OF RAILWAY ENGINEERING.

BY JOHN BOGART.

Development of the Rail--Problems for the Engineer--How

Heights are Climbed--The Use of Trestles--Construction on a

Mountain Side--Engineering on Rope Ladders--Through the Portals

of a Cañon--Feats on the Oroya Railroad, Peru--Nochistongo

Cut--Rack Rails for Heavy Grades--Difficulties in Tunnel

Construction--Bridge Foundations--Cribs and Pneumatic

Caissons--How Men work under Water--The Construction of Stone

Arches--Wood and Iron in Bridge-building--Great Suspension

Bridges--The Niagara Cantilever and the enormous Forth

Bridge--Elevated and Underground Roads--Responsibilities of the

Civil Engineer.

There are one hundred and fifty thousand miles of railway in the

United States: three hundred thousand miles of rails--in length

enough to make twelve steel girdles for the earth's circumference.

This enormous length of rail is wonderful--we do not really grasp

its significance. But the rail itself, the little section of steel,

is an engineering feat. The change of its form from the curious and

clumsy iron pear-head of thirty years ago to the present refined

section of steel is a scientific development. It is now a beam

whose every dimension and curve and angle are exactly suited to the

tremendous work it has to do. The loads it carries are enormous,

the blows it receives are heavy and constant, but it carries the

loads and bears the blows and does its duty. The locomotive and the

modern passenger and freight cars are great achievements; and so is

the little rail which carries them all.

The railway to-day is one of the matter-of-fact associations of

our active life. We use it so constantly that it requires some

little effort to think of it as a wonderful thing; a creation

of man's ingenuity, which did not exist when our grandfathers

were young. Its long bridges, high viaducts, and dark tunnels may

be remarked and remembered by the traveller, but the narrow way

of steel, the road itself, seems but a simple work. And yet the

problem of location, the determination, foot by foot and mile by

mile, of where the line must go, calls in its successful solution

for the highest skill of the engineer, whose profession before the

railway was created hardly existed at all. Locomotives now climb

heights which a few years ago no vehicle on wheels could ascend.

The writer, with some engineer friends, was in the mountains

of Colorado during the summer of 1887, and saw a train of very

intelligent donkeys loaded with ore from the mines, to which no

access could be had but by those sure-footed beasts. Within a year

one of that party of engineers had located and was building a

railway to those very mines. No heights seem too great to-day, no

valleys too deep, no cañons too forbidding, no streams too wide; if

commerce demands, the engineer will respond and the railways will

be built.

The location of the line of a railway through difficult country

requires the trained judgment of an engineer of special experience,

and the most difficult country is not by any means that which might

at first be supposed. A line through a narrow pass almost locates

itself. But the approach to a summit through rolling country is

often a serious problem. The rate of grade must be kept as light

as possible, and must never exceed the prescribed maximum. The

cuttings and the embankments must be as shallow as they can be

made--the quantities of material taken from the excavations should

be just about enough to make adjacent embankments. The curves must

be few and of light radius--never exceeding an arranged limit.

The line must always be kept as direct as these considerations

will allow--so that the final location will give the shortest

practicable economical distance from point to point. Many a mile

of railway over which we travel now at the highest speed has been

a weary problem to the engineer of location, and he has often

accomplished a really greater success by securing a line which

seems to closely fit the country over which it runs without marking

itself sharply upon nature's moulding, than if he had with apparent

boldness cut deep into the hills and raised embankments and

viaducts high over lowlands and valleys.

[Illustration: View Down the Blue from Rocky Point, Denver, South

Park and Pacific Railroad; showing successive tiers of railway.]

But roads must run through many regions where very different

measures must be taken to secure a location practicable for

traffic. For instance, a line at a high elevation approaches a wide

valley which it must cross. The rate of descent is fixed by the

established maximum grade, and the sides of the valley are much

steeper than that rate. Then the engineer must gain distance--that

is to say, he must make the line long enough to overcome the

vertical height. This can often be accomplished by carrying it

up the valley on one side and down on the other. Tributary

valleys can be made use of if necessary, and the desired crossing

thus accomplished. But at times even these expedients will not

suffice. Then the line is made to bend upon itself and wind down

the hillside upon benches cut into the earth, or rock, curving at

points where nature affords any sort of opportunity, and reaching

the valley at last in long convolutions like the path of a great

serpent on the mountain side. These lines often show several tiers

of railway, one directly above the other, as may be seen in the

illustrations on pages 49 and 51.

The long trestle shown in the illustration opposite is an

example of an expedient often of the greatest service in railway

construction. These trestles are built of wood, simply but strongly

framed together, and are entirely effective for the transport of

traffic for a number of years. Then they must be renewed, or, what

is better, be replaced by embankment, which can be gradually made

by depositing the material from cars on the trestle itself. The

trestle illustrated is interesting as conforming to the curve of

the line, which in that country, the mountains of Colorado, was

probably a necessity of location.

* * * * *

Where the direct turning of a line upon itself may not be

necessary, there may and often must be bold work done in the

construction of the road upon a mountain side. It must be supported

where necessary by walls built up from suitable foundations,

often only secured at a great depth below the grade of the road.

Projecting points of rock must be cut through, and any practicable

natural shelf or favorable formation must be made use of, as in the

picture on page 61. In some of the mountain locations, galleries

have been cut directly into the rock, the cliff overhanging the

roadway, and the line being carried in a horizontal cut or niche in

the solid wall.

[Illustration: Loop and Great Trestle near Hagerman's, on the

Colorado Midland Railway.]

The Oroya and the Chimbote railways in South America demanded

constant locations of this character. At many points it was

necessary to suspend the persons making the preliminary

measurements from the cliff above. The engineer who made these

locations told the writer that on the Oroya line the galleries

were often from 100 to 400 feet above the base of the cliff, and

were generally reached from above. Rope ladders were used to great

advantage. One 64 feet long and one 106 feet long covered the

usual practice, and were sometimes spliced together. The side

ropes were ¾ and 1¼ inches in diameter, and the rounds of wood 1¼

inches in diameter, and 16 inches and 24 inches long. These were

notched at the ends and passed through the ropes, to which they

were afterward lashed. These ladders could be rolled up and carried

about on donkeys or mules. When swung over the side of a cliff

and secured at the top, and when practicable at the bottom, they

formed a very useful instrument in location and construction. For

simple examination of the cliff, and for rough or broken slopes

not exceeding 70 to 80 degrees, an active fellow would, after some

experience, walk up and down such a slope simply grasping the

rope in his hands. If required to do any work he would secure the

rope about his body, or wind it around his arm, leaving his hands

comparatively free for light work.

The boatswain's chair--consisting of a wooden seat 6 inches wide

and two feet long, through the ends of which pass the side ropes,

looped at the top, and having their ends knotted--is a particularly

convenient seat to use where cliffs overhang to a slight degree.

The riggers were generally Portuguese sailors, who seemed to have

more agility and less fear than any other men to be found. At

Cuesta Blanca, on the Oroya, a prominent discoloration on the cliff

served as a triangulation point for locating the chief gallery.

Men were swung over the side of the cliff in a cage about 2½ feet

by 6 feet, open at the top and on the side next the rock. This

was a peculiar cliff about 1,000 feet high, rising from the river

at a general slope of about 70 degrees. The grade line of the

road was 420 feet above the river. The Chileno miners climbed up

a rope ladder to a large seam near the grade, where they lived;

provisions, water, etc., being hoisted up to them. The first men

sent over the cliff to begin the preliminary work were lowered in

a cage and took their dinners with them, for fear they would not

return to the work, and that unless a genuine start was made others

could not be induced to take their places. It is safe to say that

80 per cent. of the sixty odd tunnels on the Oroya and the seven

tunnels on the Chimbote lines were located and constructed on lines

determined by triangulation, and the results were so satisfactory

that the method may be depended upon as the best system for

determining topographical data or for locating and constructing the

lines in any similar locality.

[Illustration: Denver and Rio Grande Railway Entering the Portals

of the Grand River Cañon, Col.]

Where the rocks close in together, as in some of the cañons of our

Southwest, the railway curves about them and finds its way often

where one would hardly suppose a decent wagon road could be built.

The portals of the Grand River Cañon, as here shown, present such a

line, passing through narrow gateways of rock rising precipitously

on either side to enormous heights.

When such a cañon or a narrow valley directly crosses the line of

the road, it must be spanned by a bridge or viaduct. The Kentucky

River Bridge, shown below, is an instance. The Verrugas Bridge, on

the Lima and Oroya Railroad in Peru, is another. This bridge is at

an elevation of 5,836 feet above sea-level. It crosses a ravine at

the bottom of which is a small stream. The bridge is 575 feet long,

in four spans, and is supported by iron towers, the central one

of which is 252 feet in height. The construction was accomplished

entirely from above, the material all having been delivered at the

top of the ravine, and the erection was made by lowering each piece

to its position. This was done by the use of two wire-rope cables,

suspended across the ravine from temporary towers at each end of

the bridge.

[Illustration: The Kentucky River Cantilever, on the Cincinnati

Southern Railway.]

On the line of the same Oroya Railroad is a striking example of

the difficulties encountered in such mountain country and of

the method by which they have been overcome. A tunnel reaches a

narrow gorge, a truss is thrown across, and the tunnel continued.

Nature's wildest scenery, the deep ravine, the mountain cliffs, and

the graceful truss carrying the locomotive and train safely over

what would seem an impossible pass, here combine to give a vivid

illustration of an engineering feat.

[Illustration: Truss over Ravine, and Tunnel, Oroya Railroad, Peru.]

The location of a part of the Mexican Central Railway through the

cut of Nochistongo is peculiarly interesting. Far underneath the

level of this line of railway there was skilfully constructed,

in 1608, a tunnel which at that period was a very bold piece of

engineering. It was designed to drain the Valley of Mexico, which

has no natural outlet. This tunnel was more than six miles long

and ten feet wide. It was driven through the formation called

_tepetate_, a peculiar earth with strata of sand and marl. It was

finished in eleven months. At first excavated without a lining, it

was afterward faced with masonry. It was not entirely protected

when a great flood came, the dikes above gave way, and the tunnel

became obstructed. The City of Mexico was flooded, and it was

decided that, instead of repairing the tunnel an open cut should be

made. The engineer who had constructed the tunnel, Enrico Martinez,

was put in charge of this enormous undertaking, and others took his

place after his death. The cut is believed to be the largest ever

made in the world. For more than a century the work was continued.

Its greatest depth is now 200 feet. It was cut deeper, but has

partially filled with the washings from the slopes. The cost

was enormous, more than 6,000,000 dollars in silver having been

actually disbursed! Wages for workmen were then from 9 to 12 cents

a day. All convicts sentenced to hard labor were put at work in the

great cut. The loss of life was very great. Writers of the time

state that more than 100,000 Indians perished while engaged in the

work.

[Illustration: The Nochistongo Cut, Mexican Central Railway.]

[Illustration: The Mount Washington Rack Railroad.]

When a line of railway encountered a grade too steep for ascent

by the traction of the locomotive, the earlier engineers adopted

the inclined plane. Such planes were in use at important points

during many years. Notable instances were those by which traffic

was carried across the Alleghany Mountains, connecting on each side

with the Pennsylvania railway lines. These old planes are still

visible from the present Pennsylvania Railroad where it crosses

the summit west of Altoona. The planes were operated by stationary

engines acting upon cables attached to the cars. These cables

passed around drums at the head of the planes, the weight of the

cars on one track partially balancing those on the other. Similar

planes were in use also at Albany, Schenectady, and other places.

[Illustration: Trestle on Portland and Ogdensburg Railway, Crawford

Notch, White Mountains.]

Another effective expedient is the central rack rail. No better

or more successful example of this method of construction can be

given than the Mount Washington Railway, illustrated above. The

road was completed in 1869. Its length is 3-1/3 miles and its

total rise 3,625 feet. Its steepest grade is about 1 foot rise in

every 3 feet in length; the average grade is 1 in 4. It is built

of heavy timber, well bolted to the rock. Low places are spanned

by substantial trestle work. The gauge of the road is 4 feet 7½

inches, and it is provided with the two ordinary rails and also the

central rack rail, which is really like an iron ladder, the sides

being of angle iron and the cross-pieces of round iron 1½ inches in

diameter and 4 inches apart. Into these plays the central cog-wheel

on the locomotive, which thus climbs this iron ladder with entire

safety. Very complete arrangements are made to control the descent

of the train in case of accident to the machinery. The locomotive

is always below the train, and pushes it up the mountain. Many

thousands of passengers have been transported every year without

accident.

[Illustration: A Series of Tunnels.]

The rack railroad ascending the Righi, in Switzerland, was

copied after the Mount Washington line. Some improvements in the

construction of the rack rail and attachments have been introduced

upon mountain roads in Germany, and this system seems very

advantageous for use in exceptionally steep locations.

* * * * *

When a line of railway meets in its course a barrier of rock, it

is often best to cut directly through. If the grade is not too

far below the surface of the rock, the cut is made like a great

trench with the sides as steep as the nature of the material will

allow. Very deep cuts are, however, not desirable. The rains

bring down upon their slopes the softer material from above, and

the frost detaches pieces of rock which, falling, may result in

serious accidents to trains. Snow lodges in these deep cuts, at

times entirely stopping traffic, as in the blizzard near New York,

in March, 1888. A tunnel, therefore, while perhaps greater in

first cost than a moderately deep cut, is really often the more

economical expedient.

[Illustration: Tunnel at the Foot of Mount St. Stephen, on the

Canadian Pacific.

(The glacier 8,200 feet above the Railway.)]

[Illustration: Peña de Mora

on the La Guayra and Carácas Railway, Venezuela.]

And here is as good a place, perhaps, as any other in this chapter,

to say that true engineering is the economical adaptation of

the means and opportunities existing, to the end desired. Civil

engineering was defined, by one of the greatest of England's

engineers, as "the art of directing the great sources of

power in nature for the use and convenience of man," and that

definition was adopted as a fundamental idea in the charter of

the English Institution of Civil Engineers. But the development

of engineering-works in America has been effected successfully by

American engineers only because they have appreciated another side

of the problem presented to them. A past president of the American

Society of Civil Engineers, a man of rare judgment and remarkable

executive ability, the late Ashbel Welch, said, in discussing a

great undertaking proposed by an eminent Frenchman: "That is the

best engineering, not which makes the most splendid, or even the

most perfect, work, but that which makes a work that answers the

purpose well, at the least cost." And it may be remarked, as to

the project which he was then discussing, that after a very large

expenditure and an experience of eight years since that discussion,

the plans of the work were modified and the identical suggestions

made by Mr. Welch of a radical economical change were adopted

in 1888.[8] Another eminent American engineer, whose practical

experience has been gained in the construction and engineering

supervision of more than five thousand miles of railway, said,

in his address as President of the American Society of Civil

Engineers: "The high object of our profession is to consider and

determine the most economic use of time, power, and matter."

[Illustration: Perspective View of St. Gothard Spiral Tunnels, in

the Alps.]

That true economy, which finally secures in a completed work the

best results from the investment of capital, in first cost and

continued maintenance, is an essential element in the consideration

of any really great engineering feat.

* * * * *

The difficulties involved in the construction of a tunnel, after

the line and dimensions have been determined, depend generally

upon the nature of the material found as the work advances. Solid

rock presents really the fewest difficulties, but it is seldom

that tunnels of considerable length occur without meeting material

which requires special provision for successful treatment. In some

cases great portions of the rock, where the roof of the tunnel is

to be, press downward with enormous weight, being detached from the

adjacent mass by the occurrence of natural seams.

At other places soft material may be encountered, and the passage

then is attended with great difficulty. Temporary supports,

generally of timber, and of great strength, have often to be used

at every foot of progress to prevent the material from forcing its

way into the excavation already made.

In long tunnels the ventilation is a difficult problem, although

the use of compressed air drills has aided greatly in its solution.

[Illustration: Plan of St. Gothard Spiral Tunnels.]

Among the great tunnels which have been excavated, the St. Gothard

is the most remarkable. It is 9¼ miles long, with a section

26¼ feet wide by 19-2/3 feet high. The work on this tunnel was

continuous, and it required 9¼ years for its completion.

The Mont Cenis tunnel, 8-1/3 miles in length, was completed in 12

years.

[Illustration: Profile of the Same.]

The Hoosac Tunnel, 4¾ miles in length, 26 feet wide and 21½ feet

high, was not prosecuted continuously; it was completed in 1876.

These tunnels are notable chiefly on account of their great length;

there are others of more moderate extent which have peculiar

features; one, illustrated on the preceding page, is unique. This

tunnel is a portion of the St. Gothard Railway, and not very far

distant from the great tunnel referred to above. In the descent

of the mountain it was absolutely necessary to secure a longer

distance than a straight line or an ordinary curve would give;

the line was therefore doubly curved upon itself. It enters the

mountain at a high elevation, describes a circle through the rock

and, constantly descending, reappears under itself at the side;

still descending, it enters the mountain at another point and

continues in another circular tunnel until it finally emerges

again, under itself, but at a comparatively short horizontal

distance from its first entry, having gained the required descent

by a continued grade through the tunnels. The profile above shows

the descent, upon a greatly reduced scale, the heavy lines marking

where the line is in the tunnel.

[Illustration: Portal of a Finished Tunnel; showing Cameron's Cone,

Colorado.]

[Illustration: Portal of a Tunnel in Process of Construction.]

The American Railway: Its Construction, Development, Management, and Appliances · 第 4 / 33 段