KANSAS FARMS AND FARM INTERESTS.

Address delivered at the Smith County Fair, Smith Centre, September

24, 1885.

It has always seemed to me singular, not to say inappropriate, that

lawyers, journalists, ministers, physicians and other men having no

practical knowledge of farming, should be invited to deliver addresses

at agricultural fairs. About plowing, planting, or harvesting; about

soils and their treatment; or about any of the every-day work of

farmers, such men have little or no practical knowledge. Yet it seems to

be the rule to invite them to deliver the addresses on occasions of this

character; and, in appearing before you to-day, I plead this custom as

my excuse. I came, not because I hoped or believed that I could instruct

you in the work or duties of your vocation, but because your committee

gave me an invitation so courteous and so kindly, yet so urgent, that I

could not, without seeming rudeness, refuse to accept it.

At the beginning, therefore, I desire to say that I am neither a

practical nor a theoretical farmer. It occasionally happens, that a

man living in town or city has a real love for farm life. Such a man,

if he cannot gratify his bent, delights to study the literature of

farming, and thus accumulates a great harvest of theory, which, if

practically applied, would probably result in the production of

enormous cabbages and potatoes, and large crops of cereals, all

costing their producer three or four times their market value. A

Kansas friend of mine who has this sort of a penchant for farming, and

wealth which enables him to gratify it, owns a large farm in one of

the eastern counties of the State. Some years ago a number of his

friends from the Eastern States came to visit him, and he took them

out to see his farm. After they had admired its finely-cultivated

fields, its blooded stock, and other attractions, the proud owner

escorted the party to the farm-house, where an elaborate luncheon had

been prepared for his guests. The bill of fare included delicious milk

and—this was before the era of prohibition—sparkling champagne. When

the company had assembled, the host said: “Now, gentlemen, here is

milk and here is champagne; help yourselves to either; it makes no

difference to me—they both cost the same!”

I cannot, however, claim to have even such knowledge of farming as these

city farmers may be possessed of. My whole life, except some years of my

boyhood, has been passed in towns or cities, where my work and my duties

have happened to be. I have never even attempted to conduct a farm. I

have, of course, indulged in that universal day-dream of the dwellers in

cities or towns—the aspiration for a country home. The merchant in his

counting room, the professional man at his desk, the artisan in his

workshop, all indulge in this dream of a quiet, peaceful home in the

country; a home embowered in trees, where the birds sing, and the breath

of the morning is sweet with the perfume of flowers; where the horizon

is broad, and the view over meadows, woods and fields is as restful as

it is beautiful; and where the roar and clangor and fury of city life

are shut out. There is something in the nature of the whole human

race—in the blood from our first parents, perhaps, or that of our not

far distant progenitors who wandered over the fresh earth, living in

tents and pasturing their flocks—that whispers of the green fields and

the quiet woods, and fills all our hearts with longing for their beauty

and their repose.

Very few, however, realize this dream: I have never been able to. It

would be absurd for me, therefore, to talk to practical farmers about

the business of their lives, or to assume to instruct them concerning

the best methods of farming. You need have no fear that I will attempt

to do this.

But there are some things connected with farm life about which I may be

able to present suggestions of interest, if not of value. First, then,

it seems to me that too many Kansas farmers fail to appreciate the cash

value of pleasant surroundings at home, the real worth of farm

adornments, the dollars and cents that multiply in flowers and shrubbery

on well-kept lawns, and especially the wealth that is accumulating in

trees that are growing while they are sleeping.

There is a material and pecuniary side to this question of home

adornments, as well as an æsthetic side. The value of a farm—its cash

value, I mean—cannot be measured entirely by the fertility of its soil,

nor by the crops it produces, nor by the springs and streams that rise

or flow upon it. Its market value is affected, far more than many

farmers imagine, by the surroundings of its owner’s home. If these

resemble the environments of a wretched hovel on the outskirts of a

town; if the front door-yard is a pig-sty, and the back door-yard a

cattle-pen; if the farm-house stands, bare and desolate, like a brown

rock in a desert, beaten upon by sun and storms, by rain and wind, do

you think the value of the farm is not impaired? To say nothing of the

personal discomfort of such surroundings, do they not involve, also, a

cash depreciation of the land?

I am not talking of the homes of farmers who, lately arrived, and

possessed of limited means, have located on quarter-sections of raw

prairie, and are devoting all of their energies to the work of producing

crops. The patient heroism, the true nobility that has been illustrated

in the daily lives of thousands of Kansas farmers and Kansas farmers’

wives—men and women who, coming here with hardly a dollar, live in rude

dug-outs or cabins, in cruel isolation and bitter poverty, toiling,

saving, and enduring patiently the most trying privations, in order that

they may at last own a farm and a home—this sort of Kansas heroism, so

common and yet so splendid, may justly challenge the applause and

admiration of the world. I am speaking of and criticising, not this

class of farmers, but the farmer who, having secured a good farm and a

fair competency, goes on living his old life of monotonous drudgery, and

compels the faithful wife, who has been the companion of his toils and

his struggles, to live it with him.

Of what benefit is money, if it does not purchase some of the comforts

of life? Of what value are expanding acres and luxuriant crops, if they

do not bring in their train the delights of a pleasant and cheerful

home?

I know farmers in this State—men abundantly able to build comfortable

homes, and to surround them with all that makes life opulent and

happy—who seem content to exist amid the meanest and most squalid

surroundings. The charm and glory of a beautiful land is all about them,

but it touches no responsive chord in their hearts. Their houses are not

homes—they are simply places in which to eat and sleep. Summer suns and

winter winds blaze and beat upon them. No overhanging trees throw around

them the refreshing coolness of their shade. No verdure of grass or

perfume of flowers encircles them. No birds make the air about them

vocal with music. There they stand, lonely and desolate, avoided by

every sweet and beautiful thing in nature; and even the fresh breath of

the morning and the gentle breeze of twilight come to them tainted and

impure. Every burden and trial of human life must be multiplied and

intensified by such dreary surroundings. Yet I know, and all of you

probably know, farmers’ homes like unto this I have described.

There is, as I have said, no excuse for the farmer who, after a

residence of four or five years in Kansas, continues to live amid such

surroundings. He may not be able to build a fine house, but he can at

least plant a few trees around his home, and let the rich grass and the

lovely flowers of our prairies grow and blossom about his door-yard. All

these beautiful things can be had, by every son and daughter of Kansas,

without wealth to buy them; and with them will come the music of singing

birds, and shelter against sun and wind, and comfort, rest, and a larger

and broader view of the beauty of life and the bounty of God.

I have noticed, too, that the farmers who continue to live amid such

squalid surroundings at home, are those most likely to indulge in

prodigal extravagance, or, more properly, reckless waste, in other

directions. They buy expensive reapers, and leave them in the fields

where they were last used, to be consumed by rust and rot. Their

wagons are never housed, and their plows and harrows are consigned to

the first convenient fence-corner. Their horses and cattle shiver in

the wintry winds, or find shelter only by gnawing holes in

straw-stacks. They have no granaries for their wheat, no cribs for

their corn, and so are compelled to sell their products at once,

generally at the lowest prices of the year. And having thus invited

poverty by waste or carelessness, they call it bad luck, or attribute

their misfortunes to the contraction of the currency, or to railroad

monopolies, or to any other cause except the real cause—their own lack

of order, system, and intelligently-directed energy.

The question of selling farm products, or rather the problem of selling

them at the right time, is one of vast importance to farmers. Every

farmer ought to study carefully and intelligently, not only the current

market reports, but the reports and statistics of the food products of

the world—their probable supply, their probable demand. He should know

when to sell, and he should have a place in which to store his grain

until the right time to sell it comes. Kansas is to-day the most

prosperous state in the Union. I make this statement deliberately, and

am confident that statistical and census reports will sustain it. But

Kansas would be far more prosperous if the barns of her farmers were as

creditable to Kansas agriculture as our school houses are to Kansas

intelligence. Kansas will never be as prosperous as the State ought to

be, until every prairie slope within her borders is adorned with a

Pennsylvania barn. You all know what a Pennsylvania barn is, I suppose.

I mean one of the great double-decker barns, built on the side of a

hill, the first story capacious enough to stable all the horses and

cattle belonging on a section of land; the second story—on a level with

the ground on the upper side—vast enough to take in all the hay and

grain of the farm, and furnish, also, storage room for all its vehicles

and implements. A noble barn is the old Keystone double-decker, and the

Kansas farmer who has one of them is fully armed and equipped, not only

against the elements, but against the “bears” of the grain markets.

Forehanded, and with such a barn, he can wait until he gets his price

for his grain or his stock. He is not compelled to accept the prices

fixed by the gamblers in options. With such barns scattered all over the

prairies of Kansas, the Kansas farmers would rule the markets, would

make the price of their own products.

Another thing the farmers of Kansas want to pay greater attention to, is

road-making. Years ago, when the farms were scattered, and the roads ran

along the divides, we had, without cost or labor, the best natural

highways on the continent. But the occupancy of the country, and the

fences or the herd law, have diverted the roads to the section lines,

and, as a result, our highways are generally execrable. The losses

entailed upon the farmers of Kansas, growing out of these wretched

roads, are enormous. They foot up in a dozen different directions—in

loss of valuable time, in injury of horses, in breakage of vehicles, in

destruction of harness, in a multiplication of trips, and in many other

ways. Above all other men, the farmers of Kansas require good roads.

Increased tax levies for public highways, and an intelligent expenditure

of these levies, is one of the great needs of Kansas. A marked decrease

of the prevalent Kansas mania for new railroads, and an equally marked

increase of public interest in the construction of decent country roads,

would be a wholesome reform of incalculable advantage to the farmers of

Kansas. The law most needed in this State is a good road law—an act that

will put the building or repairing of our public highways under

competent direction, and furnish ample means for such work, and thus

give to Kansas a system of durable roads, macadamized wherever the

ground is soggy, and with solid stone culverts or bridges wherever these

are necessary.

The four questions I have thus discussed—the pecuniary value of home

adornments, the exposure of farm implements to the mercy of the

elements, the importance of commodious barns, and the necessity of

improved roads—are of direct personal and practical interest to every

Kansas farmer. And what interests the farmers of Kansas, must be of

moment to every citizen. For Kansas is an agricultural country. The

prosperity of this State is based upon its farm products. Our mineral

resources are, in comparison with our agricultural productions, small

and unimportant. We have some lead in the southeast; we have coal in

many sections, and the supply is equal to the wants of our people; we

have salt and gypsum in abundance. But the wealth of Kansas lies in our

harvest fields. Our prosperity is based, primarily, upon the plow.

Kansas embraces over fifty-two million acres of land. Fully fifty

million acres of this vast area of country is capable of producing

luxuriant crops. Only a little over thirteen million acres—less than

one-fourth of the entire area—is now under cultivation, and the land

classed as “under cultivation” includes nearly five million acres of

prairie grass. Practically, therefore, only about seven million acres of

Kansas soil have been touched by the plow. Yet the products this year

will aggregate fully ten million bushels of wheat, two hundred million

bushels of corn, six million bushels of rye, three million bushels of

oats, and seven million bushels of Irish potatoes—making two hundred and

twenty-six million bushels of these five crops.

It is not possible, as yet, to estimate the value of the field crops of

Kansas, including grasses, for the year 1885; but their value for the

previous year aggregated $104,945,773.

Kansas had last year 5,444,391 head of stock, valued at $115,645,050.

We have planted nearly twenty-two million fruit trees, and have over one

hundred and thirty thousand acres of artificial forest trees.

The assessed valuation of the property of the State, for the year 1885,

aggregates $248,820,262, an increase over last year of $11,806,505. The

real estate aggregates in value $123,000,000, an increase of nearly six

millions over the valuation of last year. The railroad property of the

State is valued at $30,367,820, an increase of $1,911,912; and we have

4,180 miles of completed railway within our borders.

This is all the growth of thirty years. I could, perhaps, more

accurately say of twenty years; for Kansas hardly began to grow until

the spring of 1865, when the home-returning soldiers and the railroads

came together. The development of Kansas during these two decades

challenges comparison with that of any country in the world. An

irresistible impulse seems to have brought hither the best blood and

brain of all the nations of the world. Our schools, colleges,

universities and churches rival those of the oldest countries, and

railways, traversing nearly every organized county, bring a market to

every farmer’s granary.

It is asked now and then, Can this wonderful growth continue? Why should

it not continue? Less than one-fourth of the entire area of Kansas, as I

have stated, is under cultivation; there are millions of acres yet

unoccupied; the immigration to Kansas this year is unprecedented; and

the human energy which is assembling here with such unprecedented

rapidity, must produce results even more remarkable than those wrought

during the past two decades. The development of the present is only the

dawn of that which is to be. The Kansas of to-day only foreshadows the

Kansas of the future.

I make this statement with a full realization of its meaning. I know

there are many, even of our own people, who believe that a very large

section of the western third of our State can never be successfully

tilled. But actual experiment is shattering this theory. The line

marking the western boundary of agricultural productiveness is a myth.

It goes westward with the settlements. The rain-belt travels with the

plow. It has been located on half a dozen degrees of longitude. It was

on the Blue river when I came to the State, nearly thirty years ago. The

valleys of the Republican, the Arkansas and the Solomon were then

regarded as rainless deserts. But the line moved westward, year by year,

until it reached the hundredth meridian. Beyond this, by almost

universal assent, it was declared that successful farming was not

possible. Yet in the northern tier, three counties lying west of that

line, and running through to Colorado, are teeming with a busy and

aggressive population; and these people point to crops of wheat and corn

equaling any ever grown elsewhere, as the most convincing answer that

can be made to the assertion that western Kansas is sterile and

rainless. On the far southwestern line the development and the harvests

produced are equally astonishing and convincing. The same wide and

beautiful valleys, the same rich uplands, the same deep and productive

soil, the same luxuriant vegetation, are the characteristics of these

far-western counties, as they are of the counties watered by the

Delaware, the Kansas, and the Neosho; and the same blue sky and pure air

bends over and envelops the whole of this great State of ours, from the

Missouri to the Colorado line.

With this fair land as his home, with this productive soil as his

workshop, and with the rare and healthful atmosphere of Kansas to

stimulate his energy, the farmer of this State ought to be contented and

prosperous. Certainly, in no other State have the opportunities for

securing pleasant homes and productive farms been so favorable and so

numerous as here in Kansas. Certainly, in no other land has so much

material wealth been dug out of the earth in so brief a time, as here in

Kansas. Certainly, in no other country under the shining stars have so

many poor and struggling men won modest fortunes by honest industry, as

here in Kansas. And certainly, the future of Kansas promises a growth

and development as rapid, and as substantial, as that of the past.

I speak of the future thus confidently, because, after all, the richest

heritage of Kansas is the imperial manhood of its citizenship. No State

in the Union, no country in the world, can boast of a braver or more

intelligent, enterprising, liberty-loving, and law-respecting

population. From the date of its organization up to the present time,

Kansas has been receiving the best blood and brain of the civilized

world. Hither, thirty years ago, came thronging a host of bright and

generous men, to protect this fair land against the aggressions of

slavery. Here, six years before Mr. Lincoln issued his first call for

volunteers, the war which was to strike from the slave his shackles,

began; and here, defying alike the power and blandishments of the

National Administration, the opponents of slavery won their first

victory. Hither, the Union saved and freedom nationalized, thronged a

great army of soldiers—men who had fought on every battle-field of the

late war, and who, during four years of peril and of hardship, had

illustrated by calm and patient endurance, and by the most magnificent

courage and patriotism, the grandest virtues of American manhood. Here

is a people who have wiped a desert from the map of the continent, and

replaced it with a garden. Here are the men who have pushed the plains

to the foot-hills of the mountains; who have dotted the treeless

prairies with forests; and who have made the solitudes of the bison the

home of the plow.

Of what achievements or conquests in the arts or industries of peace is

such a population not capable? Where are the limits that bound the

progress and development of a State having such a citizenship?

I do not believe that anyone now living can guess or gauge the

possibilities of this great State of ours. A century hence Kansas may

reach the full stature of its material growth; but not during our

lifetime will this maturity of development be witnessed; not during our

day and generation will this young commonwealth reach a point where

further advance is no longer possible. The Kansan of the future can say

of his State, as does the Kansan of to-day:

“This is the land of every land the pride,

Beloved by Heaven o’er all the world beside;

Where brighter suns dispense serener light,

And milder moons imparadise the night;

A land of beauty, virtue, valor, truth,

Time-tutored age and love-exalted youth.

This is the spot of earth supremely blest—

A dearer, sweeter spot than all the rest.”

Addresses: by John A. Martin. Delivered in Kansas. · 第 46 / 195 题