THE PANGS OF INNOCENCE.

“Yes, dear, in the married state, many things will happen to you which

you are far from expecting: but then others will happen which you

expect still less. For instance—”

The author (may we say the ingenious author?) _qui castigat ridendo

mores_, and who has undertaken the _Petty Troubles of Married Life_,

hardly needs to remark, that, for prudence’ sake, he here allows a lady

of high distinction to speak, and that he does not assume the

responsibility of her language, though he professes the most sincere

admiration for the charming person to whom he owes his acquaintance

with this petty trouble.

“For instance—” she says.

He nevertheless thinks proper to avow that this person is neither

Madame Foullepointe, nor Madame de Fischtaminel, nor Madame Deschars.

Madame Deschars is too prudish, Madame Foullepointe too absolute in her

household, and she knows it; indeed, what doesn’t she know? She is

good-natured, she sees good society, she wishes to have the best:

people overlook the vivacity of her witticisms, as, under louis XIV,

they overlooked the remarks of Madame Cornuel. They overlook a good

many things in her; there are some women who are the spoiled children

of public opinion.

As to Madame de Fischtaminel, who is, in fact, connected with the

affair, as you shall see, she, being unable to recriminate, abstains

from words and recriminates in acts.

We give permission to all to think that the speaker is Caroline

herself, not the silly little Caroline of tender years. But Caroline

when she has become a woman of thirty.

“For instance,” she remarks to a young woman whom she is edifying, “you

will have children, God willing.”

“Madame,” I say, “don’t let us mix the deity up in this, unless it is

an allusion—”

“You are impertinent,” she replies, “you shouldn’t interrupt a woman—”

“When she is busy with children, I know: but, madame, you ought not to

trifle with the innocence of young ladies. Mademoiselle is going to be

married, and if she were led to count upon the intervention of the

Supreme Being in this affair, she would fall into serious errors. We

should not deceive the young. Mademoiselle is beyond the age when girls

are informed that their little brother was found under a cabbage.”

“You evidently want to get me confused,” she replies, smiling and

showing the loveliest teeth in the world. “I am not strong enough to

argue with you, so I beg you to let me go on with Josephine. What was I

saying?”

“That if I get married, I shall have children,” returns the young lady.

“Very well. I will not represent things to you worse than they are, but

it is extremely probable that each child will cost you a tooth. With

every baby I have lost a tooth.”

“Happily,” I remark at this, “this trouble was with you less than

petty, it was positively nothing.”—They were side teeth.—“But take

notice, miss, that this vexation has no absolute, unvarying character

as such. The annoyance depends upon the condition of the tooth. If the

baby causes the loss of a decayed tooth, you are fortunate to have a

baby the more and a bad tooth the less. Don’t let us confound blessings

with bothers. Ah! if you were to lose one of your magnificent front

teeth, that would be another thing! And yet there is many a woman that

would give the best tooth in her head for a fine, healthy boy!”

“Well,” resumes Caroline, with animation, “at the risk of destroying

your illusions, poor child, I’ll just show you a petty trouble that

counts! Ah, it’s atrocious! And I won’t leave the subject of dress

which this gentleman considers the only subject we women are equal to.”

Analytical Studies · 第 164 / 187 题