I will go further! Such partiality would be a piece of idiocy.

A man,—not a writer, for in a writer there are many men,—an author,

rather, should resemble Janus, see behind and before, become a spy,

examine an idea in all its phases, delve alternately into the soul of

Alceste and into that of Philaenete, know everything though he does not

tell it, never be tiresome, and—

We will not conclude this programme, for we should tell the whole, and

that would be frightful for those who reflect upon the present

condition of literature.

Furthermore, an author who speaks for himself in the middle of his

book, resembles the old fellow in “The Speaking Picture,” when he puts

his face in the hole cut in the painting. The author does not forget

that in the Chamber, no one can take the floor _between two votes_.

Enough, therefore!

Here follows the female portion of the book: for, to resemble marriage

perfectly, it ought to be more or less hermaphroditic.

Analytical Studies · 第 158 / 187 题