SUFFOLK.

[Footnote 142.1: [From Fenn, i. 32.] The date of this letter is

sufficiently clear from the last words of it.]

[Footnote 142.2: John de la Pole, who succeeded him as Duke of

Suffolk.]

[Footnote 142.3: This heading looks as if copied by Fenn from an

endorsement, which is probably not quite contemporaneous.]

[Footnote 143.1: These words in brackets were chafed and

illegible in the original MS.]

[Footnote 143.2: According to William Worcester, the Duke

embarked on Thursday, the 30th April.]

118