CHAPTER VIII

NORTHERN EUROPE TO THE TREATY OF OLIVA

Character and policy of Oxenstjerna--The Form of Government--War

between Sweden and Denmark--Treaty of Brömsebro--Christina

of Sweden--Her character and ability--Frederick William of

Brandenburg--His character and political aims--The question of

Pomerania--Condition of his dominions at his accession--His

withdrawal from the Thirty Years’ War--Acquisition of east

Pomerania--Establishment of his personal authority--His intrigues

against Charles X. of Sweden--Acknowledgment of Swedish

suzerainty--He joins Charles X. against Poland--Obtains

independence by the treaties of Labiau and Wehlau--Death of Charles

X.--The pacification of the north.

[Sidenote: =Position of Sweden, 1632.=]

While the great powers of Europe were battling for the Rhine and

the Pyrenees, the smaller nations of the north were struggling for

the command of the Baltic. It was a contest in which Denmark played

the part of the Empire, the traditional but feeble possessor of

rightful authority, while Sweden, like another France, strong in her

new-found national unity, was impelled by her geographical position

to claim a freedom which could not fail to end in leadership.

When Gustavus Adolphus fell on the field of Lützen in 1632 he had

succeeded in winning for his country supremacy on the Baltic and a

foothold on German soil; but his life had been too short, his career

too meteor-like for him to have had time to consolidate by his

statesmanship what he had won by his genius. [Sidenote: =Character

and policy of Oxenstjerna.=] That task was left to his friend and

confidant, Axel Oxenstjerna, during the minority of the young Christina

who was only four and a half years old when her father died. The man

was well fitted to the task. Cautious, deliberate, and cold-blooded,

complete master of his emotions, he was a man of fixed ideas and

tenacious policy. Nothing moved him, nothing changed him. Twice only

in a long and anxious life did he know what it was to be sleepless,

once after the battle of Lützen, once after the battle of Nördlingen.

Patriotism in him took bodily form in the House of Vasa and Gustavus

Adolphus. During the life of the king his whole energies were devoted

to carrying out his master’s wishes, after his death to the completion

of his master’s policy. In the Thirty Years’ War, as we have seen, he

was the most strenuous and uncompromising enemy of peace. The miseries

of Germany, the dangerous ambition of France, even the deterioration

of his own country, were as nothing to him compared with the duty of

obtaining for Sweden all that Gustavus might fairly have claimed.

It required the personal intervention of the young queen herself to

prevent her minister from ruining the country in order to preserve its

dignity. At home his chief work was to place on a permanent basis the

alliance of the crown with the official nobility, which it had been the

special object of Gustavus Adolphus to create as a counterpoise to the

influence of the hereditary nobility and the clergy.

[Sidenote: =The Form of Government, 1634.=]

In the Form of Government adopted in 1634, Sweden received from

Oxenstjerna’s hands the first of modern written constitutions. By it

Lutheranism in the form of the Confession of Augsburg was imposed upon

the sovereign and all his subjects. Government was vested in the king,

advised by a senate of twenty members chosen by him from the nobility,

to whom were added five _ex officio_ members being the great

officers of state, _i.e._ the steward, the marshal, the treasurer,

the chancellor and the admiral. The whole direction of affairs during

the illness or minority of the king was placed in their hands, subject

only to the provision that all laws passed, privileges conferred, and

alienation of crown lands effected during the incapacity of the king

must receive his subsequent ratification. Other provisions of a less

important nature regulated the administration of justice, but in all of

them the same care for securing the supremacy of the noble and official

class is everywhere observable. In fact, the result of the Form of

Government was to place the chief direction of affairs in Sweden for

nearly fifty years in the hands of a narrow aristocratic clique of

official families. During the minority of Christina, no less than three

out of the five great officers of state were members of the Oxenstjerna

family alone. [Sidenote: =The government a narrow oligarchy.=]

The policy of the regency was conceived in the interests of the

nobility. They profited by the continuance of the war in Germany, for

to them fell the high commands in the army, and the opportunities of

amassing wealth by plunder and confiscation. They profited equally by

the necessities of the Crown at home, for they became the possessors

either by purchase or grant of large tracts of crown lands made over to

them by the government, partly to secure their loyalty and partly to

relieve its embarrassments. But what was meat to the nobles was poison

to the peasantry. The people soon found that the court noble or the

successful general was a far harder master to serve than ever the Crown

had been. The long-continued war raised the taxes, checked the growth

of manufactures, and drained the country of its best peasant blood,

only to return to it a body of brigand soldiers ruined in morals and

incapable of honest industry. Had it lasted but a few years longer, it

is by no means improbable that Oxenstjerna would have found that he

had purchased a foreign empire at the cost of a domestic revolution.

The quick intelligence of Christina, brought up as she was in Sweden,

while the Chancellor was forced to spend a large part of his time in

Germany, appreciated the danger; and this, quite as much as her natural

humanity, prompted her to put an end to a war, which had ceased to have

a serious political object, and was being waged in the interests of a

class and in honour of a memory.

In the war with Denmark which broke out in 1643 the narrow but

unflinching patriotism of Oxenstjerna showed itself to better

advantage. [Sidenote: =War with Denmark, 1643.=] Free passage

through the Sound and the Belts for Swedish ships was as much a

commercial necessity for the development of Swedish trade, as free

passage through the passes of Savoy was a military necessity for the

aggrandisement of France. But Denmark seated astride of the islands,

with one foot on Halland and the other on Jutland, by merely raising

the dues payable for the passage of ships, could crush the nascent

trade at its birth. In doing so it had to reckon not merely with Sweden

but with the more important maritime countries of Holland and England

who carried on with Sweden, through the Sound, a prosperous and growing

trade in skins, fur and copper, and were therefore keenly interested in

the question of the Sound tolls. But in 1639, seeing England involved

in domestic trouble, and Holland fully occupied in the ceaseless

struggle with Spain, Christian IV. thought the opportunity had

come for vigorous action. He raised the tolls on the Sound, attempted

to take the lead in German affairs by putting himself forward as

mediator in the negotiations for peace, and in July 1640 directly

insulted the government of Sweden by openly assisting the queen-mother,

Maria Eleonora of Brandenburg to escape from the dignified seclusion

in which she was kept. For the moment Oxenstjerna had to temporise,

for the affairs of Germany absorbed his whole energies, but two years

later the opportunity came. Torstenson was suddenly directed upon

Holstein without any declaration of war, and in conjunction with Horn

quickly overran the whole of the mainland. Christian taken by surprise

had to betake himself to his islands and his ships. There he fought

like a hero, holding his own manfully for two summers against the

combined efforts of Swedish fleets and Dutch sailors. [Sidenote: =The

treaty of Brömsebro, 1645.=] But the odds were too many for him,

and after a severe defeat in October 1644 he found himself obliged to

sue for peace. The next year, in August 1645, the treaty of Brömsebro

was negotiated through the mediation of France between Christian and

Oxenstjerna. [Sidenote: =Acquisition of Halland and freedom from the

Sound dues.=] By it Sweden was entirely relieved from the payments

of tolls on the Sound and the Belts, and acquired the province of

Halland on terms which practically involved its annexation. However

questionable on the score of public faith its beginning may have been,

there is no doubt that this was one of the most important and useful

wars waged by Sweden in the seventeenth century. At very little expense

to herself, she completed the work of national consolidation by making

Denmark retire across the natural frontier of the sea, and secured for

the future the free and unhampered development of her commerce. Both

of them were acquisitions essential for her national well-being, and

when once gained were gained for all time. The more showy rewards of

the peace of Westphalia on the contrary, though they mark the zenith of

the political glory of Oxenstjerna, were in no way the best gifts which

Sweden received at his hands. They contained in themselves the fruit of

future contests. Like the battles of Creci and Poitiers and the peace

of Bretigni, the battles of Breitenfeld and Wittstock and the peace of

Westphalia covered the conqueror with military glory at the cost of a

hundred years of war.

[Sidenote: =Christina of Sweden.=]

In this long drama of dull warfare, the reign of Christina is a short

but picturesque interlude. Alone among Swedes and almost alone among

sovereigns, she loved to live a life of culture among men of culture.

She was not a student, but a master of classical literature, not the

patron of men of letters, but herself a member of the sacred band.

It is therefore easy to exaggerate the importance of her reign as an

epoch in the civilisation of her country. The learning and the culture

which gathered round Christina at Stockholm fixed no roots in the

country, answered to no demand even in the university. It was a pure

exotic, called into existence by the strange accident that Sweden

had a cultured queen. It died on her abdication. It was personal and

artificial not national and spontaneous, as unlike the great outburst

of English literature under Elizabeth with which it has sometimes been

compared, as the bouquet of the theatre to the flowers of the Alps.

The men of letters themselves formed, it is to be feared, an unwelcome

and unpopular element in the half barbaric court. To the rough nobles

they were but a côterie of the queen’s friends, a clique with whom she

liked to live, a sort of superior race of pet animals which Sweden had

to feed and maintain in order to please the queen. But the very fact

that some of the most intellectual minds of the day were content to

endure the cold and discomforts of Swedish simplicity, and the hardly

concealed dislike of a barbarous and homely people, rather than lose

the distinction of being numbered among the friends of Christina, is

no mean tribute to her character and her mind. To be with her, to be

received into her friendship, to listen to her conversation, to take

part in her studies, this was the attraction which made Stockholm for

the moment the Athens of the north.

[Sidenote: =Character of Christina.=]

Christina is one of those few sovereigns who have made history by sheer

force of personal character. In the whole range of the seventeenth

century, there is no crowned head who can pretend to equality with

her in the rare gifts of originality and distinction. A sworn foe

to conventionality in all forms, with a mind uncompromisingly

logical, she went straight to the root of a matter, to the horror

of diplomatists and courtiers. The salient point of her character

is her straightforwardness. There was nothing artificial about her

and singularly little which was not original. She formed her own

conceptions of policy, of religion, of culture, of manners. She adhered

to them at all costs. She carried them out unhesitatingly. When one

of them came into collision with another, instantly she surrendered

the less to the greater. She abdicated the crown of Sweden because

she was convinced that she ought to become a Roman Catholic. She

procured the recognition of Charles Gustavus as her successor because

she was determined not to marry. At the age of eighteen she forced

the all-powerful Chancellor into making a peace which he loathed.

Ten years later, after her abdication, she murdered her steward

Monaleschi through a wilfully mistaken view of her sovereign rights.

Throughout her life she was the same,--clear-minded, self-willed, of

keen decision and petulant temper, warmhearted and true to those she

loved, malicious to those she disliked, a hater of humbug, a despiser

of conventionality, cynical in speech, generous in action, prodigal

with money, avaricious of fame, hating and hated by women, always

attractive to men. In truth Christina was one of nature’s mistakes.

She was intended for a man. Masculine in intellect, masculine in will,

masculine in bodily endurance, masculine in the roughness of her

sensibilities, she showed her sex mainly in her dislike of women. She

knew herself to be a man, and resented bitterly the freak of nature

which had clothed her with a woman’s form. She dressed like a man, rode

like a man, at times swore like a man, and confessed that one of her

greatest desires was to see a battle. No noble at the Swedish court

could tire her when hunting, or could surpass her presence of mind in

the hour of danger. She knew not what fear was, she was never seen

in tears. Yet there was something feminine in her love of intrigue,

her passion for notoriety, her want of shame. At the French court

she busied herself in making mischief between the young king and his

mother by encouraging his infatuation for Marie Mancini. She delighted

in shocking the etiquette of the royal circle by the freedom of her

conversation and the unconventionality of her attitudes, and she went

out of her way to outrage all sense of propriety by choosing the famous

courtesan Ninon de L’Enclos as the only Frenchwoman to whom she would

be decently civil. When a queen demeans herself thus, she must expect

to make enemies, and Christina had only herself to thank if she was

afterwards denied permission to visit the French court at Paris, and

found among French women her most persistent detractors.

Abdications among sovereigns are so rare that the attention of

historians has been naturally attracted by the picturesqueness of that

of Christina to the detriment of her real title to fame. [Sidenote:

=Her political ability.=] In the ten years of her rule over Sweden

she conducted a great war to a glorious end, she established her

authority by sheer ascendency of character over a narrow and jealous

oligarchy, she settled a most difficult constitutional question, that

of the devolution of the Crown, in the best way for the nation, by

her own firmness of will. She made herself beloved by her people, and

easily suppressed the conspiracy of Messenius in spite of its wide

ramifications among the democracy. She made Stockholm for the time

the most learned and cultured court of Europe. Above all when her own

religious convictions forced her into antagonism with the constitution

of her country, she never hesitated to prefer the interests of her

country to her own dignity. She recognised from the first that in

the seventeenth century it was impossible for Sweden to permit her

sovereign to be of any religion except that of Luther, and when she had

made up her mind to become a Roman Catholic she accepted the inevitable

and abdicated her throne. There are few sovereigns who can claim to

have done more for their country by activity or by renunciation than

Christina. Her abdication was right and unavoidable. The mistake she

made lay in not carrying it far enough. She ought to have retired into

private life, but this was too great a self-denial for so active a

mind and so vigorous a personality. She ceased to be queen of Sweden,

but she determined still to be queen. She maintained royal state, she

claimed royal rights, she plunged into intrigue, she interfered in

politics, she tried to dominate over literature and taste. Deprived of

all right to express, and shorn of all power to enforce, her wishes,

she soon sank into becoming the common bore of Europe, and found

herself politely relegated to her palace at Rome, where she became one

of the sights of the city and the leader of a fashionable and artistic

côterie.

While Christina was witching the northern world by the vigour and charm

of her personality, Brandenburg under the cautious and unscrupulous

Frederick William was slowly winning its way to predominance in north

Germany. [Sidenote: =Frederick William of Brandenburg.=] No two

persons could well be more different than the queen and the elector,

whom at one time a marriage project of Gustavus Adolphus had attempted

to unite in a most unequal yoke. Christina, worldly though she might

be in her love of mischief-making and petulance of disposition, was

essentially a woman of noble character and lofty aspirations. She lived

amongst great thoughts and high ideals. Frederick William grovelled

upon the earth, and cherished its mire and its dirt if only he could

possess himself of one acre the more of it. A true Hohenzollern in

his absolute identification of his country with his own crown, he

never rose above the pure selfishness of patriotism. Not one spark

of generosity illuminated his policy, not one grain of idealism

coloured his ambition, no sentiment of moral right ever interfered

with his judgment, no fear of future retribution arrested his action.

Mean-minded, false, and unscrupulous, he was the first sovereign

to display the principles of seventeenth century Machiavellianism,

stripped of their cloak of Italian refinement, in all the hideous

brutality of German coarseness. Yet the political world was not

the worse for the rule of the Great Elector. Putting all questions

of right and wrong on one side, the success achieved by Frederick

William was in the direction of progress. [Sidenote: =Ultimate aim

of his policy.=] The Thirty Years’ War left Germany shattered into

fragments as if by the stroke of a giant’s hammer, at a time when

all Europe was drawing itself together and coalescing into powerful

states. Had that disintegration continued, had no one come forward to

establish a power in northern Europe, which might at any rate form a

nucleus round which the floating atoms of northern Germany and northern

Protestantism might gather, central Europe must have fallen a prey to

French ambition or Russian barbarism. Events have shown clearly enough,

that neither Sweden, nor England, nor the United Provinces, could have

saved Europe from such a catastrophe, had there not been in northern

Germany itself a power, centralised in government and military in

spirit, which could unfurl the flag of German nationality. To found

such a power was the work of the Great Elector’s life, and before his

death the results had made themselves visible in European politics.

He it is who is the real founder of the state of Prussia. Cradled in

the horrors of the Thirty Years’ War, nourished by the falseness and

the tyranny of Frederick William, ushered into manhood by the cynical

ambition of Frederick the Great, she has yet become in her steady

protest against French domination one of the chief bulwarks of European

order, in her assertion of German unity the centre of the noblest of

German aspirations.

[Sidenote: =Rivalry between Brandenburg and Sweden in the Thirty

Years’ War.=]

When Frederick William succeeded his father in the electorate of

Brandenburg in 1640 no one would have predicted that from that desolate

discredited and divided state was to arise the hope of Germany. The

policy of neutrality in the earlier years of the war, adopted not

without a certain amount of shrewdness by George William in conjunction

with his friend John George of Saxony, had broken down under the menace

of the guns of Gustavus Adolphus and the invasion of Tilly. But the

league between the Swedes and the elector could never be anything more

than hollow, unless the former were prepared to surrender the rights of

a conqueror over Pomerania. George William was the acknowledged heir of

the old duke Boguslav. Pomerania, with its extensive seaboard, was just

what Brandenburg wanted for her national development, and the Elector

had been accustomed to look upon it as his own. The landing of Gustavus

Adolphus changed the whole face of affairs in a moment. Pomerania

became just as important to the Swedes as a basis of communication

with Sweden and the Baltic, as it was to Brandenburg as a step in her

aggrandisement. Why should the Swedes, who had saved the country from

the hands of Wallenstein, surrender it tamely to George William who had

not stirred one finger of his own free will on behalf of the Protestant

cause? Naturally enough the Swedes stuck obstinately to their rights

of conquest. Never would Oxenstjerna yield to the technical claims of

Brandenburg, what Gustavus Adolphus had wrested from the enemy by force

of arms. Never would Brandenburg abate her just and legal demands in

the face of a selfish and brutal conqueror. So as time went on Sweden

became far more the national enemy of Brandenburg than the Emperor had

ever been. The unfortunate mark, lying as it did on the straight road

between Bohemia and the Baltic, was harried alternately by the armies

of both sides as the fortune of war ebbed and flowed. In 1635 George

William accepted the treaty of Prague, but that gave no respite to his

unlucky domain. In 1638, unable to find sustenance in the impoverished

mark, he removed his court to Königsberg in east Prussia, where he died

worn out with misery and failure in 1640, leaving his son Frederick

William at the age of twenty the possessor of little land and many

claims.

[Sidenote: =Brandenburg at the accession of Frederick William,

1640.=]

The territories owned by Frederick William on his accession were

divided into three quite separate districts.[3] The old possessions

of the house of Hohenzollern in north Europe consisted of the mark of

Brandenburg, subdivided for administrative purposes into the old mark,

the middle mark and the new mark, which they had ruled as margraves and

as electors since the beginning of the fifteenth century. [Sidenote:

=The mark of Brandenburg.=] This country, purely German, was like

other German states part of the Empire, subject to the legal authority

of the Emperor and had its own diet with vague powers of counsel and

control over the elector in local affairs. [Sidenote: =The duchy of

East Prussia.=] On the east of the Vistula, altogether outside of

the limits of the Empire, was the duchy of east Prussia, which had

become the hereditary possession of the Hohenzollerns by one of the

accidents of the Reformation. The country belonged to the Order of the

Teutonic Knights, and was subject to the suzerainty of Poland, but

in 1525 the Knights accepted the Lutheran Reformation, dissolved the

Order, and formed their territory into a duchy hereditary in the house

of the grand master of the time, count Albert of Hohenzollern. At the

beginning of the seventeenth century his line became merged in that of

the Brandenburg branch of the family, and the elector of Brandenburg

became also duke of east Prussia. Here, as in the mark, the existence

of a diet in which sat both nobles and burghers formed a constitutional

check on the will of the ruler, a check all the more effective because

of the reluctance with which the people of east Prussia and their

feudal suzerain the king of Poland had acknowledged the rights of the

Brandenburg branch to the duchy. But the territorial claims of the

young elector did not stop with the German mark of Brandenburg, the

Polish duchy of east Prussia, and the succession to the German duchy of

Pomerania. [Sidenote: =Duchy of Cleves.=] Within the limits of the

Empire, stretching along both banks of the Rhine, in the neighbourhood

of Köln, lay the duchies of Cleves, Jülich, Berg and Mark, to which the

elector of Brandenburg and the count of Neuburg had put in claims as we

have seen in 1609 and thereby very nearly precipitated the great war.

By the treaty of Xanten, concluded in 1614 and practically renewed in

1630, the disputed territory was divided between the claimants, and the

duchies of Cleves Mark and Ravensberg fell to the share of Brandenburg.

During the war, however, Brandenburg was unable to make its power

recognised over its new domains. The country was for some time the

battle-ground of the Spaniards and the Dutch. As the tide of war rolled

away from the lower Rhine it was occupied and practically administered

by the Dutch, and when peace was restored Frederick William found

himself obliged to assert what was to all intents and purposes a new

sovereignty.

[Sidenote: =Aims of Frederick William.=]

Bearing in mind the scattered character of the Brandenburg possessions,

a glance at the map is sufficient to show how geographical

considerations dictated to the young elector his policy, and inspired

his territorial ambitions. If only he could make good his claims on

Pomerania, or at least on the eastern part of it, there would be

nothing but the strip of west Prussia along the banks of the Vistula

to separate his German dominions from his duchy of east Prussia. A

successful war, or a lucky diplomatic stroke, might raise him at once

into the position of the greatest power in the north. Side by side

with the territorial dream went as was natural in a prince of the

seventeenth century a dynastic ambition. Already events had made his

dependence upon the Emperor almost nominal, the same success which won

him west Prussia and united his dominions would also free him from his

feudal vassalage to Poland. Once thoroughly independent of foreign

authority he could turn his attention to his own subjects, and on the

ruins of the effete and discredited diets raise, like Richelieu in

France, a highly centralised military sovereignty in which the crown

should be all in all. Such was the policy laid down for himself and

his house by the Great Elector, and adhered to unflinchingly by his

descendants ever since. Centralisation of the government, military

rule, constant territorial aggrandisement have been the characteristics

of the Prussian monarchy, and have ended in making out of the

disjointed and turbulent dominions of Frederick William, a united and

peaceful kingdom, which stretches from Russia to Belgium, and embraces

in its ample folds the valleys of the Rhine, the Elbe, the Oder and the

Vistula.

[Sidenote: =Unavoidable hostility of Sweden and Poland.=]

Directly in the way of the realisation of the least of these designs,

as the Great Elector well knew, lay the hostile powers of Sweden and of

Poland. He could not touch Pomerania without encountering the bitter

jealousy of Sweden, he could not advance an inch towards the union of

east Prussia and Brandenburg without first destroying the integrity

of Poland. Over the prostrate bodies of these formidable neighbours

lay the only road to his territorial ambition. It was a road beset

with difficulties. What chance could the barren ravaged and disunited

Brandenburg have in an unequal contest with Sweden, at that time

admittedly the first military power in northern Europe? How could the

half-starved German peasant withstand the onslaught of the brave though

undisciplined masses of Polish cavalry? Frederick William knew that he

must wait for a favourable opportunity, and spent the time in anxious

preparation. His first care was to transfer the conduct of affairs in

the mark from the hands of his father’s minister, Schwartzenburg, who

was devoted to the Emperor, to his own, and to reorganise the army

under himself. In this he was aided by the death of Schwartzenburg

in 1641, and the subsequent revolt of his son and the discontented

officers. [Sidenote: =Establishment of his personal authority in

Brandenburg and East Prussia, 1641.=] Having thus got at his back a

force upon which he could depend he openly broke with the Emperor, and

with the full approbation of the diet entered into negotiations with

the Swedes for a treaty of neutrality. Then turning his attention to

the duchy of east Prussia, where the estates were trying to establish

their superiority over him, with a diplomatic skill rarely found in a

man of twenty, he succeeded in sowing dissensions between the nobles

and the representatives of the towns, who took the lead in opposing

his authority. By winning the former over to his side he was able to

procure the recognition of his rule from John Casimir, king of Poland,

in spite of the protest of the towns, and thus to enter legally upon

his sovereignty. [Sidenote: =His withdrawal from the Thirty Years’

War, 1643.=] In 1643 the treaty with Sweden was successfully

concluded, and for the rest of the war Brandenburg was practically free

from the ravages of the rival armies. The breathing space thus gained

was devoted by Frederick William to the reorganisation of the finances

and the training of the army, and Brandenburg was in consequence

enabled to assert her claims to consideration in the negotiations at

Münster and Osnabrück with a force which would have appeared incredible

in the days of George William. [Sidenote: =Gains of Brandenburg at

the peace of Westphalia, 1648.=] When the peace of Westphalia was

finally settled it was found that Brandenburg was given the right of

annexing the secularised bishoprics of Magdeburg, Halberstadt, Minden

and Camin, and the duchy of eastern Pomerania. [Sidenote: =Occupation

of Eastern Pomerania, 1653.=] But the larger part of the lands were

at the time of the conclusion of peace in the military occupation of

the Swedes, and they were not at all disposed to evacuate them, until

they had been paid the indemnity for their expenses which had been

secured to them by the peace. Finally however, after much negotiation

and many delays, the patience and skill of the Great Elector prevailed

over all obstacles, and the year 1653 saw the back of the last Swedish

soldier in retreat from eastern Pomerania.

[Sidenote: =Position of Brandenburg, 1653.=]

The year 1653 closes the first chapter of the story of the

aggrandisement of Brandenburg. The territory of the elector now

stretched in a compact mass across north Germany from Halberstadt to

the Baltic. It comprised parts of the fertile valleys of the Elbe,

the Havel and the Oder with their industrious populations, as well

as the important coast line of eastern Pomerania with its numerous

harbours. Detached from the central mass lay the duchy of east Prussia

beyond the Vistula and the scattered districts of Cleves and Mark upon

the Rhine and of Ravensberg and Minden upon the Weser. Inferior in

prestige and military power to Sweden, inferior in extent to Poland,

Brandenburg nevertheless emerged from the Thirty Years’ War stronger,

both actually and relatively, than she was when the struggle began.

There was no German power in north Germany her equal in strength,

and no power in north Europe her superior in government. Since he

had come to the throne Frederick William had steadily followed the

policy of centralising the administration under himself and crushing

the independent rights of the diets. In Brandenburg itself, where the

advantages of centralisation under so able and keen-sighted a ruler

were quickly seen, the opposition was never formidable, and in 1653,

the very year of the annexation of eastern Pomerania, the ancient diet

went quietly into perpetual sleep for want of being summoned. In east

Prussia and in Cleves the work was far more difficult, and the Elector

had to content himself for a time with crushing all serious opposition

by the employment of Brandenburg soldiers to keep order, a proceeding

which although illegal was extremely effective.

In 1655 occurred an event which called forth all the Great Elector’s

powers of statesmanship. The old hostility between Poland and Sweden,

the two most dangerous neighbours of Brandenburg, suddenly flamed out

again. John Casimir, king of Poland, refused to acknowledge Charles

Gustavus, who had succeeded to the Swedish throne on the abdication

of Christina. [Sidenote: =War between Sweden and Poland, 1655.=]

Charles, who had been brought up in the school of the Thirty Years’ War

and was no mean soldier, determined to avenge the insult, and demanded

from the Great Elector the right of passage through eastern Pomerania

into Poland, in order to avoid the difficult task of the siege of the

sea fortress of Dantzig, which had cost Gustavus Adolphus many weary

hours some twenty-five years before. Frederick William was not in a

position to resist, and after making a few demonstrations to cover

appearances, gave the required permission. The Swedes, using Pomerania

as their basis of operations, poured across Brandenburg into Poland,

defeated John Casimir, drove him back on Cracow and then returned

leisurely into west Prussia to form the siege of Dantzig. The Great

Elector now thought he saw his opportunity. [Sidenote: =Unsuccessful

intrigue of Frederick William against Sweden.=]The Poles were

beaten not conquered. Denmark was ever ready to strike a blow at her

old enemy across the Baltic. Charles X. was fully occupied

round Dantzig. A well-planned alliance and a well-timed stroke might

bring Sweden to her knees and win his own independence of Poland. But

Charles was too quick for him. [Sidenote: =Acknowledgment of Swedish

suzerainty over East Prussia, 1656.=] Hearing of the negotiations in

the middle of the winter of 1655–56 he at once broke up his camp and

marched into east Prussia on Königsberg. Frederick William had to make

his peace as best he could. By the treaty of Königsberg, developed by

the treaty of Marienbad, concluded in June 1656, Brandenburg was forced

to acknowledge the suzerainty of Sweden over east Prussia, instead

of that of Poland, to grant to the Swedes free passage through the

country, and to provide a contingent to serve under Swedish orders in

the Polish war.

[Sidenote: =War with Poland, 1656.=]

It was a bitter lesson to the Great Elector, but ever patient and

ever trustful of his own diplomatic skill, he continued his policy

and awaited a more favourable opportunity, but for the present he had

to submit to the inevitable. The Brandenburg contingent marched with

Charles X. and the Swedish army to Warsaw, and did their

share in the winning of the great three days’ battle in July 1656,

which placed Poland at the feet of the Swedes. But the victory of

Charles X. was, as is so often the case, the beginning of his

difficulties. It was always easy to defeat a Polish army, it was almost

impossible to reduce the country to submission. The intrigues of the

Great Elector began to bear fruit. [Sidenote: =Coalition against

Sweden.=] While Charles was planning the pursuit of John Casimir

into the recesses of the forests of Galicia, the king of Denmark was

preparing to invade Sweden itself, the Russians declared war, and a

horde of Tartars and Lithuanians poured into east Prussia. Charles

X. found himself in the middle of a hostile country, with

a doubtful ally, surrounded by a host of enemies. Frederick William

insisted on an immediate return to defend east Prussia from the

invaders. Charles could not resist so plausible a demand. [Sidenote:

=Treaty of Labiau. Ackowledgment of the independence of East Prussia

by Sweden, 1656.=] With a heavy heart he retired from the scene of

his victory into west Prussia, where he took ship for Denmark, having

first done what he could to retain Frederick William in his enforced

alliance by recognising the independence of east Prussia in the treaty

of Labiau, signed in November 1656. Directly his back was turned,

the Great Elector threw off the mask, and offered his friendship and

assistance to John Casimir, if only he would follow the example of

Sweden, and release east Prussia from all claims of feudal vassalage.

[Sidenote: =Treaty of Wehlau. Acknowledgment of the independence

of East Prussia by Poland, 1657.=] As long as he obtained his

independence, Frederick William did not trouble about the honesty

of the transaction. John Casimir accepted the terms. By the treaty

of Wehlau, concluded in September 1657, the Great Elector cynically

reversed the treaty of Labiau, made only ten months before, became the

ally of Poland and the enemy of Sweden, and received as the reward of

his dissimulation, the recognition of the independence of east Prussia

by his legitimate suzerain.

The anger of Charles X. when he heard of it knew no bounds.

Thirsting for revenge he nerved himself to attempt the feats of a hero.

[Sidenote: =Attack upon Denmark by Sweden, 1657.=] In the depth

of the winter of 1657–58, he suddenly marched his army of 20,000 men

across the ice of the Belts upon Denmark, and captured the islands of

Fünen and Zealand on his way without ships, crossing it is said some

runlets of open water by bridges. Denmark, paralysed with astonishment

hastened to make peace, and Charles directed his army upon east

Prussia. But fortunately for the Great Elector, Europe had become tired

of incessant war; and the great states, especially the maritime powers

of England and Holland, had no wish to see their trade interfered with

by the conquests of a new Alexander of the north. They interfered

to impose negotiations for peace upon the combatants. [Sidenote:

=Treaties of Oliva, Copenhagen, and Kardis, 1660–1661.=] The death

of Charles X. in February 1660 made their task the easier,

and on May 3rd, 1660, was signed the treaty of Oliva, between Sweden,

Poland and Brandenburg. In the following month the treaty of Copenhagen

restored peace to Sweden and Denmark, and in 1661 the north was finally

pacified by the conclusion of the treaty of Kardis between Sweden and

Russia.

[Sidenote: =Terms of the pacification of north.=]

By these treaties John Casimir of Poland renounced all claims upon

the throne of Sweden, and acknowledged the independent sovereignty of

Frederick William in east Prussia. Frederic III. of Denmark

surrendered almost all the remaining possessions of Denmark on the

Scandinavian peninsula to Sweden, and all other conquests made were

restored. Sweden thus attained the geographical unity which she had

long desired, and the Great Elector had guaranteed to him by European

treaty the independent sovereignty over the duchy of east Prussia which

he had risked so much to gain. If the peace of Westphalia marks the

first great step in the territorial aggrandisement of Brandenburg,

the peace of Oliva marks the first great step towards the dynastic

aggrandisement of the elector. Already absolute and sovereign in

Brandenburg, he now became sovereign in east Prussia, and only one step

remained to be taken, to make the united state of Brandenburg-Prussia

the most formidable, because the most centralised power of the north.

The ascendancy of France, 1598-1715 · 第 8 / 15 章