THE PROUD CITY DOOMED.

xiii. 1. _The burden of Babylon, which Isaiah the son of

Amoz did see._

In 2 Kings xvii. we find an account of the invasion of Israel by the

Assyrians (vers. 1-6). Then follows a long enumeration of the sins

which had brought this Divine visitation upon the ten tribes, ending

with the words, "So was Israel carried away out of their own land to

Assyria unto this day" (ver. 23). If the scourge was no longer in the

hands of the king of Assyria, it would be transferred to other hands

not less terrible.

1. Would this scourge destroy the life of the Jewish nation? This was

the awful question which presented itself to the minds of the

prophets when they saw one and another limb of this nation lopped

off, when they saw that a great numerical majority of the tribes

would be carried away. Isaiah's eyes were opened to see whence the

permanence of the race was derived, how great critical moments in its

life discovered Him who was everlastingly present with it. The child

born in hours of trouble and rebuke had borne witness to him of the

continuance of the regal family as well as of the people of God's

covenant, when the rage of their enemies as well as of their own

faithlessness were threatening them with destruction. Nor was this

all. In the miserable, heartless reign of Ahaz the vision had been

presented to him of a "Rod coming out of the stem of Jesse, which

should stand for an ensign of the people. To it should the Gentiles

seek, and His rest should be glorious." Consider _the Rod out of

Jesse, what it betokened_ (Isa. xi. 10-12). The immediate fruits

which Isaiah saw coming out of this root might have appeared in the

days of any patriotic and prosperous prince, and did actually appear

in the latter days of Hezekiah. No doubt Hezekiah might become, and

did actually become, "an ensign to the nations," just as Solomon had

been before him, one to whom they brought presents, whose alliance

they sought, whose elevation out of a deep calamity was a proof that

some mighty God was with him. But--

2. Though we need not seek in any more distant days than those of

Hezekiah for a very satisfactory fulfilment of these predictions (and

let it never be forgotten that what may seem to us, when we look back

over 3000 years, an exaggerated description of deliverance and

restoration, must have seemed inadequate and almost cold to those who

experienced the blessing),--though Hezekiah was a rod out of the stem

of Jesse, and though the Spirit of the Lord did rest upon him

(xi. 2),--though the peacefulness and order of his last years might

faithfully carry out the symbols of the wolf and the lamb lying down

together, yet it was no less impossible for the prophet to think

chiefly of Hezekiah when he was uttering these words than it would

have been for him to fancy that he was the King whom he saw sitting

on the throne, and his train filling the temple in the year that

Uzziah died (chap. vi. 1-4). There was, however, this great blessing

which came to Isaiah from his being able to connect the Divine King

with an actual man--the belief that a man must embody and present the

Godhead, that only in a man could its blessedness and glory appear,

acquired a force and vividness from his hope of Hezekiah's government

and from his actual experience of it, which we may say, without

rashness or profaneness, would have been otherwise wanting in him. In

using that language, we are only affirming that any method but the

one which we know the Divine Wisdom has adopted for conveying a truth

to a man's spirit must be an imperfect method. Hezekiah's existence

was necessary to the instruction of Isaiah, and through him of all

generations to come. Perhaps Shalmaneser and Sennacherib were, in

another way, scarcely less necessary.

Apparently the prophet passes in this chapter to an entirely new

subject. The Assyrian seems to be forgotten. He opens with the burden

of Babylon; he goes on to the burden of Damascus, &c. But Babel or

Babylon represented to the prophets the attempt to establish a

universal society, not upon the acknowledgment of the Divine care and

protection, but upon the acknowledgment of a mere power in nature

against which men must try to measure their own. The order and

history of the Jewish nation were made, from age to age, silently to

testify against it. "Babylon is the glory of kingdoms, the beauty of

the Chaldees' excellency" (ver. 19); her time is near to come, and

her days shall not be prolonged (ver. 22). But these and similar

words must refer to more than the destruction of a certain Chaldean

city then or afterwards. How can we limit them to it when we find

such words as those in vers. 11-13? Instead of being, as some

suppose, an interpolated fragment, the burden of Babylon comes in to

make all the visitations upon the other tribes of the earth

intelligible. They are diverse but harmonious portions of the same

Divine message to man--a message of terror, but also of deliverance

and hope. In chap. xiv. we find how wonderfully these are combined.

But though most feel something of the grandeur of this poetry, and a

few the truth of this prophecy, we do not enough consider upon what

both are founded. The God-Man was the ground upon which the Jewish

nation stood; here you have the contrast--the man-god; he would

ascend up to heaven and exalt his throne above the stars of God. This

is the natural ruler of a society which counts the gold of Ophir more

precious than human beings. We have here the Babylonian power and the

Jerusalem power, that parody of human and Divine greatness which is

seen in an earthly tyrant, that perfect reconciliation of Divinity

and humanity which is seen in the Redeemer. Consider both images

well. Both are presented to us; we must admire and copy one of them;

and whichever we take, we must resolutely discard the other. If we

have ever mixed them together in our minds, a time is at hand that

will separate them for ever. The Babylonian mark and image, your own

evil nature, a corrupt society, the evil spirit, have been striving

to stamp you ever since your childhood. Each hour you are tempted to

think a man less precious than the gold of Ophir; the current maxima

of the world take for granted that he is; you in a thousand ways are

acting on those maxims. Oh, remember that in them, and in the habits

which they beget, lies the certain presage of slavery for men and

nations, the foretaste of decay and ruin, which no human contrivances

can avert, which the gifts and blessings of God's providence only

accelerate. May God grant us power to cast Babylonian principles out

of our hearts, that when they come before us we may despise them and

laugh them to scorn, knowing that not against us but against the Holy

One the enemy is exalting himself. In that day may we be able to sing

the song which the prophet said should be sung in the land of Judah

(xxvi. 1-4).--_F. D. Maurice, M.A.: Prophets and Kings,_ pp. 272-290.

The Preacher's Complete Homiletic Commentary on the Books of the Bible, Volume 15 (of 32) The Preacher's Complete Homiletic Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Isaiah, Volume I · 第 655 / 808 题