FOOTNOTES:

[1] If a king warns a city of traitors, and calls upon them to

search them out and send them away, and they never regard

the message, but willingly give them harbour and

entertainment, it is a sign that they are disaffected to

him: to cherish a sin after warning is open defiance of

God.--_Manton,_ 1620-1667.

[2] At this first step we might reason on the testimony if we

pleased, instead of accepting it, and raise the objection

that to imagine passion in God, especially so turbid a

passion as anger, conflicts with our notions of His

character, and degrades Him in our apprehensions. Beware!

remember that in forming an estimate of the character and

proceedings of God, we are but little children forming an

estimate of the character and proceedings of a man of

matured experience. Were it not more reasonable, as well as

more reverent, to accept what He says, and to leave Him

afterwards to clear up any mystery which may envelope His

nature? I can indeed conceive in Him nothing turbid,

impetuous, or impulsive, such as sullies the clearness of

the human will. But this I can conceive, that there is in

Him some high perfection (more incomprehensible to my

finite capacity than the speculations of an astronomer to a

peasant child), of which anger is the most adequate

exponent to my mind, and which I must be content to think

of and speak of as anger, or else to remain in total

ignorance of it. And this also I can--not only conceive,

but most readily assent to, that in an absolutely perfect

nature there should be an utter abhorrence of, and

antipathy to, moral evil, most justly represented to simple

minds by the terms "anger," "curse." We have never seen a

perfect character; no perfect character, save one, ever

moved upon the earth: but the righteous man, who is

striving after and approximating to perfection, has often

crossed our path; and surely we have marked in him, that

the more righteous he is, the more doth he abhor (in the

language of Holy Scriptures) everything that is evil. What

is the effect upon one who breathes habitually the

atmosphere of communion with God, of catching in the

current tidings of the day the intelligence of some awful

outburst of depravity? When such an one passes on an errand

of mercy through the crowded alleys of a great city, and

the shouts of malignant execration and profaneness ring in

his ear, or with what feeling does he encounter these

symptoms of human degradation? Are they not like a foul

odour to his nostrils, or a jarring note to his ear, or an

abortion to his sight? Does he not turn away with loathing,

and recoil from such scenes and such sounds with an

antipathy strong in proportion to his goodness? And is it,

then, so hard to conceive that in perfect goodness there

may be a recoil from moral evil, something similar in kind

to this, though infinitely stronger in degree? And is not

such a recoil righteous, and a token of

righteousness?--_Goulburn._

[3] Let us take heed, for mercy is like a rainbow, which God

set in the clouds to remember mankind: it shines here as

long as it is not hindered; but we must never look for it

after it is night, and it shines not in the other world. If

we refuse mercy here, we shall have justice there.--_Jeremy

Taylor,_ 1612-1667.

The Preacher's Complete Homiletic Commentary on the Books of the Bible, Volume 15 (of 32) The Preacher's Complete Homiletic Commentary on the Book of the Prophet Isaiah, Volume I · 第 92 / 808 题