LONDON : HENRY COLBURN, NEW BURLINGTON STREET, 1829.

[p.v] PREFACE OF THE EDITOR.

SOME years have now elapsed since two distinct portions of Burckhardt’s

works (his Travels in Nubia and Syria) were offered to the public, and

most favourably received; their success being insured not only by

instrinsic merit, but by the celebrity of their editor as a scholar and

antiquary, a traveller and a geographer. It must not however be

inferred, from any delay in publishing the present volume, that its

contents are less worthy of notice than those parts which have already

proved so interesting and instructive to a multitude of readers. It was

always intended that this Journal, and other writings of the same

lamented author, should issue successively from the press: “There still

remain,” says Colonel Leake, in his Preface to the Syrian Journal (p.

ii.) “manuscripts sufficient to fill two volumes: one of these will

consist of his Travels in Arabia, which were confined to the Hedjaz or

Holy Land of the Muselmans, the part least accessible to Christians; the

fourth volume will contain very copious remarks on the Arabs of the

Desert, and particularly the Wahabys.”

[p.vi] Respecting the portion now before the reader, Colonel Leake, in

another place, expresses a highly flattering opinion. “Burckhardt,” says

he, “transmitted to the Association the most accurate and complete

account of the Hedjaz, including the cities of Mekka and Medina, which

has ever been received in Europe. His knowledge of the Arabic language,

and of Mohammedan manners, had enabled him to assume the Muselman

character with such success, that he resided at Mekka during the whole

time of the pilgrimage, and passed through the various ceremonies of the

occasion, without the smallest suspicion having arisen as to his real

character.” (See the Life of Burckhardt prefixed to his Travels in

Nubia, p. lvii. 4to. edition, 1819).

Recommended so strongly, the work of a less eminent traveller would be

entitled to our notice: this presents itself with another claim; for the

manuscript Journal was partly corrected and prepared for publication by

the learned editor of Burckhardt’s former writings. But some important

literary occupations prevented Colonel Leake from superintending the

progress of this volume through the press. His plan, however, has been

almost invariably adopted by the actual editor; particularly in

expressing with scrupulous fidelity the author’s sentiments on all

occasions, and in retaining, without any regard to mere elegance of

style or selection of terms, his original language, wherever an

alteration was not absolutely necessary to reconcile with our system of

phraseology and grammatical construction certain foreign idioms which

had crept into his English writings. [It was thought expedient, from

circumstances of typographical convenience tending to facilitate and

expedite the publication of this volume, that the Arabic characters

which in the original manuscript follow immediately certain words, or

appear between the lines or in the margin, should here be placed

together at the end, as an Index, with references to the pages wherein

they occur.]

[p.vii] The map prefixed to this volume might almost appear superfluous,

since the positions of Djidda, Mekka, Medina, Tayf, and Yembo, the chief

places of Hedjaz visited by Burckhardt, are indicated with accuracy in

the excellent maps that illustrate his Nubian and Syrian Travels. But as

the reader of this volume cannot reasonably be supposed to have

constantly at hand, for immediate reference, the two former portions of

our author’s works, a map is here given, in the construction and

delineation of which Mr. Sydney Hall has attended to every suggestion

offered by the editor: at whose recommendation the names of places are

spelt after Burckhardt’s manner, however different from that more usual

among us. [Thus in the map as in the letter-press of this volume, Mekka

might have been spelt Mecca; and Hejaz, Jidda, Nejed, would as well

express the proper sounds of those words as Hedjaz, Djidda, Nedjed; and

at the same time approximate more closely to the original Arabic

orthography, by which our English j (as in Jar, James, &c.) is

represented without the assistance of a d; although the prefixing of

this letter to the j might prevent a Frenchman from pronouncing it as in

jour, jamais, &c.]

By the editor’s advice, also, several places situate beyond the Eastern

limits of Hedjaz are included in this map; since Burckhardt, although he

did not visit them himself, has given some original itineraries, in

which they are mentioned.

That those places do not belong to the region properly denominated

Hedjaz, is evident; but how far this region extends eastward cannot

easily be determined; and the same difficulty respecting it occurs in

various directions. The editor, that he might ascertain by what

boundaries we are justified in supposing Hedjaz to be separated from

other provinces of Arabia, consulted a multiplicity of authors, both

European and Oriental. The result, however, of his inquiry has not

proved satisfactory; for to each of the neighbouring countries.

[p.viii] certain writers have assigned towns, stations, and districts,

which by others of equal authority are placed in Hedjaz.

Such confusion may partly have arisen from the different statements of

the number, extent, and names of divisions comprised within the same

space; this being occupied, according to European writers, by three

great regions, the Stony, the Desert, and the Happy Arabia; while

Oriental geographers partition it into two, five, six, seven, or more

provinces, under denominations by no means corresponding in

signification to the epithets above mentioned, which we have borrowed

from the Greeks and Romans.

That it would be a most difficult, or scarcely possible task, to fix

precisely the limits of each Arabian province, is acknowledged by that

excellent geographer, D’Anville; but he seems disposed to confound the

region comprising Mekka, Djidda, and Yembo, (places which, as we know,

are unequivocally in Hedjaz,) with Arabia Felix. [D’Anville, Géographie

Ancienne.] D’Herbelôt, in one place, declares Hedjaz to be Arabia

Petraea, [See the Bibliothèque Orientale in “Hegiaz ou Higiaz”--“Nom

d’une province de l’Arabie, que nous appelons Pierreuse,” &c.--

Richardson also, in his Arabic and Persian Dictionary, explains Hijaz by

“Mecca and the adjacent country, Arabia Petraea;” and Demetrias

Alexandrides, who translated some portions of Abulfeda’s Geography into

Greek, (printed at Vienna, 1807, 8vo.) always renders Hedjaz by [Greek

text] and in another he identifies it with Arabia Deserta. [“Les

Provinces de Tahama et d’Iemamah sont comme au coeur du pays; celle de

Hegiaz est devenue la plus célebre à cause des villes de la Mecque et de

Medine, et fait avec les deux dernières que nous avons nommées ce que

nous appelons l’Arabie Déserte.”--Biblioth. Orient. in “Arab.”]]

Among the Eastern writers, some divide Arabia into two parts, Yemen and

Hedjaz; others into five great provinces, Yemen, Hedjaz, Nedjed, Tehama,

and Yemama. Bahrein has also been included;

[p.ix] and Aroudh is named as an Arabian province, but appears to be the

same as Yemama. Hadramaut, Mahrah, Shejr, Oman, and other subdivisions

have likewise been reckoned independent provinces by some, while many

confound them with the greater regions, Yemen and Hedjaz. To the latter,

indeed, are often assigned even the extensive countries of Nedjed,

Tehama, and Yemama.

Respecting the boundaries of all these provinces, much embarrassment has

arisen from contradictory statements made by several of the most eminent

Oriental geographers; Edrisi, Abulfeda, Al Madaieni, Ibn Haukal, Ibn el

Vardi, Bakoui, and others. Mr. Rommel, a very ingenious commentator on

Abulfeda’s “Arabia,” is frequently obliged to acknowledge the difficulty

of ascertaining where one division begins and another terminates. With

regard, more particularly, to the boundaries of Hedjaz, Abulfeda is

silent; but it appears that his opinion, so far as Mr. Rommel could

collect from incidental accounts of places assigned to this province and

adjoining territories, did not in all respects coincide with the

statements of other celebrated geographers. [See “Christophori Rommel

Abulfedea Arabiae Descriptio, commentario perpetuo illustrata,”

Gottingae, 1802, 4to. “Ambitum et fines hujus provinciae Abulfeda

designare supersedet.--Al Madaieni haec profert: ‘Hhegiaz est provincia

complectens illum tractum montium qui inde ab Yaman expansus usque ad

Sham (Syriam) protenditur. In eo tractu sitae sunt Madinah et Amman’--

Cum hoc dissidere Abulfedam non dubium est.--Ibn al Arabi: “Quod est

inter Tehamah et Nagd illud est Hhegiaz.’--Fusius Ibn Haukal: ‘Quod

protenditur a limite Serrain urbis sitae ad mare Kolzum adusque viciniam

Madian, et inde reflectendo per limitem tendentem in ortum urbis Hhegr,

ad montem Tai trunseundo juxta tergum Yamamah ad mare Persicum, hoc

totum ad Hhegiaz pertinet.’ Et alio loco: ‘Hhegiaz ea est provincia,

quae Maccah et Madinah et Yamamah cum earundem territoriis

comprehendit.’--Ibn al Vardi Hhegiaz appellat provinciam secus Sinum

Arabicum et a regione Habyssiniae sitam--Bakui eam inter Yaman et

Syriam posuisse satis habet, simul longitudinem ejus mensis itinere

emetiens.”--(pp. 57-68.)]

[p.x] It may perhaps be asked, why our inquisitive traveller did not

learn from some intelligent native the precise extent and limits of

Hedjaz? To this question the following passage (written by Burckhardt,

near the end of his journal, and probably intended for the Appendix,)

may serve as a reply, and show that even the present inhabitants do not

agree in their application of the name Hedjaz. “This,” says he, “is not

used by the Arabian Bedouins in the usual acceptation of the word. They

call Hedjaz exclusively the mountainous country, comprehending many

fertile valleys south of Tayf, and as far as the dwelling-places of the

Asyr Arabs, where the coffee-tree begins to be cultivated abundantly.

This is the general application of the term among all the Bedouins of

those countries; and the town’s-people of Mekka and Djidda also use it

in that sense among themselves. But when they converse with foreigners,

whose notions they politely adopt, the name Hedjaz is bestowed on the

country between Tayf, Mekka, Medina, Yembo, and Djidda. The Bedouins

give the name of El Ghor, or the low-land, to the whole province

westward of the mountains from Mekka up to Beder and Yembo; while those

mountains themselves northward of Tayf are called by them Hedjaz-es’-

Shám, or the Northern Hedjaz.” [This would confirm the derivation of

Hedjaz (mentioned by Golius) from ahhtedjezet, “quod (provincia Hhegiaz)

colligata et constricta montibus sit:” but others derive it from the

Arabic word yehedjez, because Hedjaz divides Nedjed from Tehama, or

because it connects Yemen with Syria, between which it is situate. As

even the shortest note written by Burckhardt must be considered

valuable, a few lines, that immediately follow the passage above quoted

from his Journal, are here given: “I compute the population of the

province usually called Hedjaz, comprising the whole territory of the

Sherif of Mekka, together with that of Medina and the towns situated

therein, and all the Bedouin tribes, at about two hundred and fifty

thousand souls; a number which, I am certain, is rather over than under

rated; the greater part being the Bedouin inhabitants of the mountains,

and principally the strong tribes of Beni Harb.”]

[p.xi] On reference to pages 396 and 397, a remark will be found

concerning the different application of this name (Hedjaz) among those

who inhabit the sea-coast and those Bedouins who occupy the interior

country; and it will even appear that doubts have been entertained

whether the sacred city Medina does not belong rather to Nedjed than to

Hedjaz.

From statements so vague as those above quoted, an attempt to trace

exactly the limits of any country must be vain and fallacious: that

region, therefore, which borders on the Red Sea, and which the natives,

we know, entitle unequivocally Hedjaz, is marked in our map, as in

almost every other published hitherto, merely with that name, its first

letter being placed where the editor supposes Arabia Petraea to

terminate, and its last letter where he would separate Hedjaz from

Tehama. [Burckhardt (Syrian Travels p. 511.) quotes Makrizi, the Egyptian

historian, who says, in his chapter on Aila, (Akaba): “It is from hence

that the Hedjaz begins: in former times it was the frontier place of the

Greeks, &c.”]

To those who seek the most accurate information respecting places but

little known, this work is sufficiently recommended by the name of its

author, and of the country which it describes. “The manners of the

Hejazi Arabs have continued,” says Sir William Jones, “from the time of

Solomon to the present age.” [Discourse on the Arabs, Asiat. Researches,

vol. ii.] “Our notions of Mecca must be drawn,” says Gibbon, “from the

Arabians. As no unbeliever is permitted to enter the city, our

travellers are silent; and the short hints of Thevenot are taken from

the suspicious mouth of an African renegado.” [Roman Empire, chap. 50.

note 18.]

Travels in Arabia; comprehending an account of those territories in Hedjaz which the Mohammedans regard as sacred · 第 5 / 95 题