Chapter XXIX: Division Of Roman Empire Between Sons Of

Theodosius.—Part I.

Final Division Of The Roman Empire Between The Sons Of

Theodosius.—Reign Of Arcadius And Honorius—Administration Of

Rufinus And Stilicho.—Revolt And Defeat Of Gildo In Africa.

The genius of Rome expired with Theodosius; the last of the

successors of Augustus and Constantine, who appeared in the field

at the head of their armies, and whose authority was universally

acknowledged throughout the whole extent of the empire. The

memory of his virtues still continued, however, to protect the

feeble and inexperienced youth of his two sons. After the death

of their father, Arcadius and Honorius were saluted, by the

unanimous consent of mankind, as the lawful emperors of the East,

and of the West; and the oath of fidelity was eagerly taken by

every order of the state; the senates of old and new Rome, the

clergy, the magistrates, the soldiers, and the people. Arcadius,

who was then about eighteen years of age, was born in Spain, in

the humble habitation of a private family. But he received a

princely education in the palace of Constantinople; and his

inglorious life was spent in that peaceful and splendid seat of

royalty, from whence he appeared to reign over the provinces of

Thrace, Asia Minor, Syria, and Egypt, from the Lower Danube to

the confines of Persia and Æthiopia. His younger brother

Honorius, assumed, in the eleventh year of his age, the nominal

government of Italy, Africa, Gaul, Spain, and Britain; and the

troops, which guarded the frontiers of his kingdom, were opposed,

on one side, to the Caledonians, and on the other, to the Moors.

The great and martial præfecture of Illyricum was divided

between the two princes: the defence and possession of the

provinces of Noricum, Pannonia, and Dalmatia still belonged to

the Western empire; but the two large dioceses of Dacia and

Macedonia, which Gratian had intrusted to the valor of

Theodosius, were forever united to the empire of the East. The

boundary in Europe was not very different from the line which now

separates the Germans and the Turks; and the respective

advantages of territory, riches, populousness, and military

strength, were fairly balanced and compensated, in this final and

permanent division of the Roman empire. The hereditary sceptre of

the sons of Theodosius appeared to be the gift of nature, and of

their father; the generals and ministers had been accustomed to

adore the majesty of the royal infants; and the army and people

were not admonished of their rights, and of their power, by the

dangerous example of a recent election. The gradual discovery of

the weakness of Arcadius and Honorius, and the repeated

calamities of their reign, were not sufficient to obliterate the

deep and early impressions of loyalty. The subjects of Rome, who

still reverenced the persons, or rather the names, of their

sovereigns, beheld, with equal abhorrence, the rebels who

opposed, and the ministers who abused, the authority of the

throne.

Theodosius had tarnished the glory of his reign by the elevation

of Rufinus; an odious favorite, who, in an age of civil and

religious faction, has deserved, from every party, the imputation

of every crime. The strong impulse of ambition and avarice 1 had

urged Rufinus to abandon his native country, an obscure corner of

Gaul, 2 to advance his fortune in the capital of the East: the

talent of bold and ready elocution, 3 qualified him to succeed in

the lucrative profession of the law; and his success in that

profession was a regular step to the most honorable and important

employments of the state. He was raised, by just degrees, to the

station of master of the offices. In the exercise of his various

functions, so essentially connected with the whole system of

civil government, he acquired the confidence of a monarch, who

soon discovered his diligence and capacity in business, and who

long remained ignorant of the pride, the malice, and the

covetousness of his disposition. These vices were concealed

beneath the mask of profound dissimulation; 4 his passions were

subservient only to the passions of his master; yet in the horrid

massacre of Thessalonica, the cruel Rufinus inflamed the fury,

without imitating the repentance, of Theodosius. The minister,

who viewed with proud indifference the rest of mankind, never

forgave the appearance of an injury; and his personal enemies had

forfeited, in his opinion, the merit of all public services.

Promotus, the master-general of the infantry, had saved the

empire from the invasion of the Ostrogoths; but he indignantly

supported the preeminence of a rival, whose character and

profession he despised; and in the midst of a public council, the

impatient soldier was provoked to chastise with a blow the

indecent pride of the favorite. This act of violence was

represented to the emperor as an insult, which it was incumbent

on his dignity to resent. The disgrace and exile of Promotus were

signified by a peremptory order, to repair, without delay, to a

military station on the banks of the Danube; and the death of

that general (though he was slain in a skirmish with the

Barbarians) was imputed to the perfidious arts of Rufinus. 5 The

sacrifice of a hero gratified his revenge; the honors of the

consulship elated his vanity; but his power was still imperfect

and precarious, as long as the important posts of præfect of the

East, and of præfect of Constantinople, were filled by Tatian, 6

and his son Proculus; whose united authority balanced, for some

time, the ambition and favor of the master of the offices. The

two præfects were accused of rapine and corruption in the

administration of the laws and finances. For the trial of these

illustrious offenders, the emperor constituted a special

commission: several judges were named to share the guilt and

reproach of injustice; but the right of pronouncing sentence was

reserved to the president alone, and that president was Rufinus

himself. The father, stripped of the præfecture of the East, was

thrown into a dungeon; but the son, conscious that few ministers

can be found innocent, where an enemy is their judge, had

secretly escaped; and Rufinus must have been satisfied with the

least obnoxious victim, if despotism had not condescended to

employ the basest and most ungenerous artifice. The prosecution

was conducted with an appearance of equity and moderation, which

flattered Tatian with the hope of a favorable event: his

confidence was fortified by the solemn assurances, and perfidious

oaths, of the president, who presumed to interpose the sacred

name of Theodosius himself; and the unhappy father was at last

persuaded to recall, by a private letter, the fugitive Proculus.

He was instantly seized, examined, condemned, and beheaded, in

one of the suburbs of Constantinople, with a precipitation which

disappointed the clemency of the emperor. Without respecting the

misfortunes of a consular senator, the cruel judges of Tatian

compelled him to behold the execution of his son: the fatal cord

was fastened round his own neck; but in the moment when he

expected. and perhaps desired, the relief of a speedy death, he

was permitted to consume the miserable remnant of his old age in

poverty and exile. 7 The punishment of the two præfects might,

perhaps, be excused by the exceptionable parts of their own

conduct; the enmity of Rufinus might be palliated by the jealous

and unsociable nature of ambition. But he indulged a spirit of

revenge equally repugnant to prudence and to justice, when he

degraded their native country of Lycia from the rank of Roman

provinces; stigmatized a guiltless people with a mark of

ignominy; and declared, that the countrymen of Tatian and

Proculus should forever remain incapable of holding any

employment of honor or advantage under the Imperial government. 8

The new præfect of the East (for Rufinus instantly succeeded to

the vacant honors of his adversary) was not diverted, however, by

the most criminal pursuits, from the performance of the religious

duties, which in that age were considered as the most essential

to salvation. In the suburb of Chalcedon, surnamed the Oak, he

had built a magnificent villa; to which he devoutly added a

stately church, consecrated to the apostles St. Peter and St.

Paul, and continually sanctified by the prayers and penance of a

regular society of monks. A numerous, and almost general, synod

of the bishops of the Eastern empire, was summoned to celebrate,

at the same time, the dedication of the church, and the baptism

of the founder. This double ceremony was performed with

extraordinary pomp; and when Rufinus was purified, in the holy

font, from all the sins that he had hitherto committed, a

venerable hermit of Egypt rashly proposed himself as the sponsor

of a proud and ambitious statesman. 9

1 (return) [ Alecto, envious of the public felicity, convenes an

infernal synod Megaera recommends her pupil Rufinus, and excites

him to deeds of mischief, &c. But there is as much difference

between Claudian’s fury and that of Virgil, as between the

characters of Turnus and Rufinus.]

2 (return) [ It is evident, (Tillemont, Hist. des Emp. tom. v. p.

770,) though De Marca is ashamed of his countryman, that Rufinus

was born at Elusa, the metropolis of Novempopulania, now a small

village of Gassony, (D’Anville, Notice de l’Ancienne Gaule, p.

289.)]

3 (return) [ Philostorgius, l. xi c. 3, with Godefroy’s Dissert.

p. 440.]

4 (return) [ A passage of Suidas is expressive of his profound

dissimulation.]

5 (return) [ Zosimus, l. iv. p. 272, 273.]

6 (return) [ Zosimus, who describes the fall of Tatian and his

son, (l. iv. p. 273, 274,) asserts their innocence; and even his

testimony may outweigh the charges of their enemies, (Cod. Theod.

tom. iv. p. 489,) who accuse them of oppressing the Curiae. The

connection of Tatian with the Arians, while he was præfect of

Egypt, (A.D. 373,) inclines Tillemont to believe that he was

guilty of every crime, (Hist. des Emp. tom. v. p. 360. Mem.

Eccles. tom vi. p. 589.)]

7 (return) [—Juvenum rorantia colla Ante patrum vultus stricta

cecidere securi.

Ibat grandaevus nato moriente superstes Post trabeas exsul. —-In

Rufin. i. 248.

The facts of Zosimus explain the allusions of Claudian; but his

classic interpreters were ignorant of the fourth century. The

fatal cord, I found, with the help of Tillemont, in a sermon of

St. Asterius of Amasea.]

8 (return) [ This odious law is recited and repealed by Arcadius,

(A.D. 296,) on the Theodosian Code, l. ix. tit. xxxviii. leg. 9.

The sense as it is explained by Claudian, (in Rufin. i. 234,) and

Godefroy, (tom. iii. p. 279,) is perfectly clear.

—-Exscindere cives Funditus; et nomen gentis delere laborat.

The scruples of Pagi and Tillemont can arise only from their zeal

for the glory of Theodosius.]

9 (return) [ Ammonius.... Rufinum propriis manibus suscepit sacro

fonte mundatum. See Rosweyde’s Vitae Patrum, p. 947. Sozomen (l.

viii. c. 17) mentions the church and monastery; and Tillemont

(Mem. Eccles. tom. ix. p. 593) records this synod, in which St.

Gregory of Nyssa performed a conspicuous part.]

The character of Theodosius imposed on his minister the task of

hypocrisy, which disguised, and sometimes restrained, the abuse

of power; and Rufinus was apprehensive of disturbing the indolent

slumber of a prince still capable of exerting the abilities and

the virtue, which had raised him to the throne. 10 But the

absence, and, soon afterwards, the death, of the emperor,

confirmed the absolute authority of Rufinus over the person and

dominions of Arcadius; a feeble youth, whom the imperious

præfect considered as his pupil, rather than his sovereign.

Regardless of the public opinion, he indulged his passions

without remorse, and without resistance; and his malignant and

rapacious spirit rejected every passion that might have

contributed to his own glory, or the happiness of the people. His

avarice, 11 which seems to have prevailed, in his corrupt mind,

over every other sentiment, attracted the wealth of the East, by

the various arts of partial and general extortion; oppressive

taxes, scandalous bribery, immoderate fines, unjust

confiscations, forced or fictitious testaments, by which the

tyrant despoiled of their lawful inheritance the children of

strangers, or enemies; and the public sale of justice, as well as

of favor, which he instituted in the palace of Constantinople.

The ambitious candidate eagerly solicited, at the expense of the

fairest part of his patrimony, the honors and emoluments of some

provincial government; the lives and fortunes of the unhappy

people were abandoned to the most liberal purchaser; and the

public discontent was sometimes appeased by the sacrifice of an

unpopular criminal, whose punishment was profitable only to the

præfect of the East, his accomplice and his judge. If avarice

were not the blindest of the human passions, the motives of

Rufinus might excite our curiosity; and we might be tempted to

inquire with what view he violated every principle of humanity

and justice, to accumulate those immense treasures, which he

could not spend without folly, nor possess without danger.

Perhaps he vainly imagined, that he labored for the interest of

an only daughter, on whom he intended to bestow his royal pupil,

and the august rank of Empress of the East. Perhaps he deceived

himself by the opinion, that his avarice was the instrument of

his ambition. He aspired to place his fortune on a secure and

independent basis, which should no longer depend on the caprice

of the young emperor; yet he neglected to conciliate the hearts

of the soldiers and people, by the liberal distribution of those

riches, which he had acquired with so much toil, and with so much

guilt. The extreme parsimony of Rufinus left him only the

reproach and envy of ill-gotten wealth; his dependants served him

without attachment; the universal hatred of mankind was repressed

only by the influence of servile fear. The fate of Lucian

proclaimed to the East, that the præfect, whose industry was

much abated in the despatch of ordinary business, was active and

indefatigable in the pursuit of revenge. Lucian, the son of the

præfect Florentius, the oppressor of Gaul, and the enemy of

Julian, had employed a considerable part of his inheritance, the

fruit of rapine and corruption, to purchase the friendship of

Rufinus, and the high office of Count of the East. But the new

magistrate imprudently departed from the maxims of the court, and

of the times; disgraced his benefactor by the contrast of a

virtuous and temperate administration; and presumed to refuse an

act of injustice, which might have tended to the profit of the

emperor’s uncle. Arcadius was easily persuaded to resent the

supposed insult; and the præfect of the East resolved to execute

in person the cruel vengeance, which he meditated against this

ungrateful delegate of his power. He performed with incessant

speed the journey of seven or eight hundred miles, from

Constantinople to Antioch, entered the capital of Syria at the

dead of night, and spread universal consternation among a people

ignorant of his design, but not ignorant of his character. The

Count of the fifteen provinces of the East was dragged, like the

vilest malefactor, before the arbitrary tribunal of Rufinus.

Notwithstanding the clearest evidence of his integrity, which was

not impeached even by the voice of an accuser, Lucian was

condemned, almost with out a trial, to suffer a cruel and

ignominious punishment. The ministers of the tyrant, by the

orders, and in the presence, of their master, beat him on the

neck with leather thongs armed at the extremities with lead; and

when he fainted under the violence of the pain, he was removed in

a close litter, to conceal his dying agonies from the eyes of the

indignant city. No sooner had Rufinus perpetrated this inhuman

act, the sole object of his expedition, than he returned, amidst

the deep and silent curses of a trembling people, from Antioch to

Constantinople; and his diligence was accelerated by the hope of

accomplishing, without delay, the nuptials of his daughter with

the emperor of the East. 12

10 (return) [ Montesquieu (Esprit des Loix, l. xii. c. 12)

praises one of the laws of Theodosius addressed to the præfect

Rufinus, (l. ix. tit. iv. leg. unic.,) to discourage the

prosecution of treasonable, or sacrilegious, words. A tyrannical

statute always proves the existence of tyranny; but a laudable

edict may only contain the specious professions, or ineffectual

wishes, of the prince, or his ministers. This, I am afraid, is a

just, though mortifying, canon of criticism.]

11 (return) [

—fluctibus auri Expleri sitis ista nequit— ***** Congestae

cumulantur opes; orbisque ruinas Accipit una domus.

This character (Claudian, in. Rufin. i. 184-220) is confirmed by

Jerom, a disinterested witness, (dedecus insatiabilis avaritiae,

tom. i. ad Heliodor. p. 26,) by Zosimus, (l. v. p. 286,) and by

Suidas, who copied the history of Eunapius.]

12 (return) [

—Caetera segnis; Ad facinus velox; penitus regione remotas Impiger

ire vias.

This allusion of Claudian (in Rufin. i. 241) is again explained

by the circumstantial narrative of Zosimus, (l. v. p. 288, 289.)]

But Rufinus soon experienced, that a prudent minister should

constantly secure his royal captive by the strong, though

invisible chain of habit; and that the merit, and much more

easily the favor, of the absent, are obliterated in a short time

from the mind of a weak and capricious sovereign. While the

præfect satiated his revenge at Antioch, a secret conspiracy of

the favorite eunuchs, directed by the great chamberlain

Eutropius, undermined his power in the palace of Constantinople.

They discovered that Arcadius was not inclined to love the

daughter of Rufinus, who had been chosen, without his consent,

for his bride; and they contrived to substitute in her place the

fair Eudoxia, the daughter of Bauto, 13 a general of the Franks

in the service of Rome; and who was educated, since the death of

her father, in the family of the sons of Promotus. The young

emperor, whose chastity had been strictly guarded by the pious

care of his tutor Arsenius, 14 eagerly listened to the artful and

flattering descriptions of the charms of Eudoxia: he gazed with

impatient ardor on her picture, and he understood the necessity

of concealing his amorous designs from the knowledge of a

minister who was so deeply interested to oppose the consummation

of his happiness. Soon after the return of Rufinus, the

approaching ceremony of the royal nuptials was announced to the

people of Constantinople, who prepared to celebrate, with false

and hollow acclamations, the fortune of his daughter. A splendid

train of eunuchs and officers issued, in hymeneal pomp, from the

gates of the palace; bearing aloft the diadem, the robes, and the

inestimable ornaments, of the future empress. The solemn

procession passed through the streets of the city, which were

adorned with garlands, and filled with spectators; but when it

reached the house of the sons of Promotus, the principal eunuch

respectfully entered the mansion, invested the fair Eudoxia with

the Imperial robes, and conducted her in triumph to the palace

and bed of Arcadius. 15 The secrecy and success with which this

conspiracy against Rufinus had been conducted, imprinted a mark

of indelible ridicule on the character of a minister, who had

suffered himself to be deceived, in a post where the arts of

deceit and dissimulation constitute the most distinguished merit.

He considered, with a mixture of indignation and fear, the

victory of an aspiring eunuch, who had secretly captivated the

favor of his sovereign; and the disgrace of his daughter, whose

interest was inseparably connected with his own, wounded the

tenderness, or, at least, the pride of Rufinus. At the moment

when he flattered himself that he should become the father of a

line of kings, a foreign maid, who had been educated in the house

of his implacable enemies, was introduced into the Imperial bed;

and Eudoxia soon displayed a superiority of sense and spirit, to

improve the ascendant which her beauty must acquire over the mind

of a fond and youthful husband. The emperor would soon be

instructed to hate, to fear, and to destroy the powerful subject,

whom he had injured; and the consciousness of guilt deprived

Rufinus of every hope, either of safety or comfort, in the

retirement of a private life. But he still possessed the most

effectual means of defending his dignity, and perhaps of

oppressing his enemies. The præfect still exercised an

uncontrolled authority over the civil and military government of

the East; and his treasures, if he could resolve to use them,

might be employed to procure proper instruments for the execution

of the blackest designs, that pride, ambition, and revenge could

suggest to a desperate statesman. The character of Rufinus seemed

to justify the accusations that he conspired against the person

of his sovereign, to seat himself on the vacant throne; and that

he had secretly invited the Huns and the Goths to invade the

provinces of the empire, and to increase the public confusion.

The subtle præfect, whose life had been spent in the intrigues

of the palace, opposed, with equal arms, the artful measures of

the eunuch Eutropius; but the timid soul of Rufinus was

astonished by the hostile approach of a more formidable rival, of

the great Stilicho, the general, or rather the master, of the

empire of the West. 16

13 (return) [ Zosimus (l. iv. p. 243) praises the valor,

prudence, and integrity of Bauto the Frank. See Tillemont, Hist.

des Empereurs, tom. v. p. 771.]

14 (return) [ Arsenius escaped from the palace of Constantinople,

and passed fifty-five years in rigid penance in the monasteries

of Egypt. See Tillemont, Mem. Eccles. tom. xiv. p. 676-702; and

Fleury, Hist Eccles. tom. v. p. 1, &c.; but the latter, for want

of authentic materials, has given too much credit to the legend

of Metaphrastes.]

15 (return) [ This story (Zosimus, l. v. p. 290) proves that the

hymeneal rites of antiquity were still practised, without

idolatry, by the Christians of the East; and the bride was

forcibly conducted from the house of her parents to that of her

husband. Our form of marriage requires, with less delicacy, the

express and public consent of a virgin.]

16 (return) [ Zosimus, (l. v. p. 290,) Orosius, (l. vii. c. 37,)

and the Chronicle of Marcellinus. Claudian (in Rufin. ii. 7-100)

paints, in lively colors, the distress and guilt of the

præfect.]

The celestial gift, which Achilles obtained, and Alexander

envied, of a poet worthy to celebrate the actions of heroes has

been enjoyed by Stilicho, in a much higher degree than might have

been expected from the declining state of genius, and of art. The

muse of Claudian, 17 devoted to his service, was always prepared

to stigmatize his adversaries, Rufinus, or Eutropius, with

eternal infamy; or to paint, in the most splendid colors, the

victories and virtues of a powerful benefactor. In the review of

a period indifferently supplied with authentic materials, we

cannot refuse to illustrate the annals of Honorius, from the

invectives, or the panegyrics, of a contemporary writer; but as

Claudian appears to have indulged the most ample privilege of a

poet and a courtier, some criticism will be requisite to

translate the language of fiction or exaggeration, into the truth

and simplicity of historic prose. His silence concerning the

family of Stilicho may be admitted as a proof, that his patron

was neither able, nor desirous, to boast of a long series of

illustrious progenitors; and the slight mention of his father, an

officer of Barbarian cavalry in the service of Valens, seems to

countenance the assertion, that the general, who so long

commanded the armies of Rome, was descended from the savage and

perfidious race of the Vandals. 18 If Stilicho had not possessed

the external advantages of strength and stature, the most

flattering bard, in the presence of so many thousand spectators,

would have hesitated to affirm, that he surpassed the measure of

the demi-gods of antiquity; and that whenever he moved, with

lofty steps, through the streets of the capital, the astonished

crowd made room for the stranger, who displayed, in a private

condition, the awful majesty of a hero. From his earliest youth

he embraced the profession of arms; his prudence and valor were

soon distinguished in the field; the horsemen and archers of the

East admired his superior dexterity; and in each degree of his

military promotions, the public judgment always prevented and

approved the choice of the sovereign. He was named, by

Theodosius, to ratify a solemn treaty with the monarch of Persia;

he supported, during that important embassy, the dignity of the

Roman name; and after he returned to Constantinople, his merit

was rewarded by an intimate and honorable alliance with the

Imperial family. Theodosius had been prompted, by a pious motive

of fraternal affection, to adopt, for his own, the daughter of

his brother Honorius; the beauty and accomplishments of Serena 19

were universally admired by the obsequious court; and Stilicho

obtained the preference over a crowd of rivals, who ambitiously

disputed the hand of the princess, and the favor of her adopted

father. 20 The assurance that the husband of Serena would be

faithful to the throne, which he was permitted to approach,

engaged the emperor to exalt the fortunes, and to employ the

abilities, of the sagacious and intrepid Stilicho. He rose,

through the successive steps of master of the horse, and count of

the domestics, to the supreme rank of master-general of all the

cavalry and infantry of the Roman, or at least of the Western,

empire; 21 and his enemies confessed, that he invariably

disdained to barter for gold the rewards of merit, or to defraud

the soldiers of the pay and gratifications which they deserved or

claimed, from the liberality of the state. 22 The valor and

conduct which he afterwards displayed, in the defence of Italy,

against the arms of Alaric and Radagaisus, may justify the fame

of his early achievements and in an age less attentive to the

laws of honor, or of pride, the Roman generals might yield the

preeminence of rank, to the ascendant of superior genius. 23 He

lamented, and revenged, the murder of Promotus, his rival and his

friend; and the massacre of many thousands of the flying

Bastarnae is represented by the poet as a bloody sacrifice, which

the Roman Achilles offered to the manes of another Patroclus. The

virtues and victories of Stilicho deserved the hatred of Rufinus:

and the arts of calumny might have been successful if the tender

and vigilant Serena had not protected her husband against his

domestic foes, whilst he vanquished in the field the enemies of

the empire. 24 Theodosius continued to support an unworthy

minister, to whose diligence he delegated the government of the

palace, and of the East; but when he marched against the tyrant

Eugenius, he associated his faithful general to the labors and

glories of the civil war; and in the last moments of his life,

the dying monarch recommended to Stilicho the care of his sons,

and of the republic. 25 The ambition and the abilities of

Stilicho were not unequal to the important trust; and he claimed

the guardianship of the two empires, during the minority of

Arcadius and Honorius. 26 The first measure of his

administration, or rather of his reign, displayed to the nations

the vigor and activity of a spirit worthy to command. He passed

the Alps in the depth of winter; descended the stream of the

Rhine, from the fortress of Basil to the marshes of Batavia;

reviewed the state of the garrisons; repressed the enterprises of

the Germans; and, after establishing along the banks a firm and

honorable peace, returned, with incredible speed, to the palace

of Milan. 27 The person and court of Honorius were subject to the

master-general of the West; and the armies and provinces of

Europe obeyed, without hesitation, a regular authority, which was

exercised in the name of their young sovereign. Two rivals only

remained to dispute the claims, and to provoke the vengeance, of

Stilicho. Within the limits of Africa, Gildo, the Moor,

maintained a proud and dangerous independence; and the minister

of Constantinople asserted his equal reign over the emperor, and

the empire, of the East.

17 (return) [ Stilicho, directly or indirectly, is the perpetual

theme of Claudian. The youth and private life of the hero are

vaguely expressed in the poem on his first consulship, 35-140.]

18 (return) [ Vandalorum, imbellis, avarae, perfidae, et dolosae,

gentis, genere editus. Orosius, l. vii. c. 38. Jerom (tom. i. ad

Gerontiam, p. 93) call him a Semi-Barbarian.]

19 (return) [ Claudian, in an imperfect poem, has drawn a fair,

perhaps a flattering, portrait of Serena. That favorite niece of

Theodosius was born, as well as here sister Thermantia, in Spain;

from whence, in their earliest youth, they were honorably

conducted to the palace of Constantinople.]

20 (return) [ Some doubt may be entertained, whether this

adoption was legal or only metaphorical, (see Ducange, Fam.

Byzant. p. 75.) An old inscription gives Stilicho the singular

title of Pro-gener Divi Theodosius]

21 (return) [ Claudian (Laus Serenae, 190, 193) expresses, in

poetic language “the dilectus equorum,” and the “gemino mox idem

culmine duxit agmina.” The inscription adds, “count of the

domestics,” an important command, which Stilicho, in the height

of his grandeur, might prudently retain.]

22 (return) [ The beautiful lines of Claudian (in i. Cons.

Stilich. ii. 113) displays his genius; but the integrity of

Stilicho (in the military administration) is much more firmly

established by the unwilling evidence of Zosimus, (l. v. p.

345.)]

23 (return) [—Si bellica moles Ingrueret, quamvis annis et jure

minori,

Cedere grandaevos equitum peditumque magistros

Adspiceres. Claudian, Laus Seren. p. 196, &c. A modern general

would deem their submission either heroic patriotism or abject

servility.]

24 (return) [ Compare the poem on the first consulship (i.

95-115) with the Laus Serenoe (227-237, where it unfortunately

breaks off.) We may perceive the deep, inveterate malice of

Rufinus.]

25 (return) [—Quem fratribus ipse Discedens, clypeum

defensoremque dedisti. Yet the nomination (iv. Cons. Hon. 432)

was private, (iii. Cons. Hon. 142,) cunctos discedere... jubet;

and may therefore be suspected. Zosimus and Suidas apply to

Stilicho and Rufinus the same equal title of guardians, or

procurators.]

26 (return) [ The Roman law distinguishes two sorts of minority,

which expired at the age of fourteen, and of twenty-five. The one

was subject to the tutor, or guardian, of the person; the other,

to the curator, or trustee, of the estate, (Heineccius,

Antiquitat. Rom. ad Jurisprudent. pertinent. l. i. tit. xxii.

xxiii. p. 218-232.) But these legal ideas were never accurately

transferred into the constitution of an elective monarchy.]

27 (return) [ See Claudian, (i. Cons. Stilich. i. 188-242;) but

he must allow more than fifteen days for the journey and return

between Milan and Leyden.]

History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire — Volume 3(#733) · 第 18 / 36 章