Other toasts, usual at Masonic festivals, having been given, the Prince

of Wales proposed success to the institution, and made a statement

respecting its position and progress:--

"Freemasons had fully recognized the importance of education--a

subject which had of late so much occupied the public mind--and

had founded many schools. The Royal Masonic Institution for Boys

was founded in 1798, when six boys were admitted. In 1810, when

the jubilee of the reign of George III. was celebrated, the

number was increased to 50, and now there were 110 in the

school. The total cost of the new building had been £47,000 of

which £5000 was still owing, while there were other matters

which raised the total liability to £10,200. There were now 155

candidates for admission, but there were only nine vacancies,

although 20 more boys could be admitted if the institution was

free from debt. He was sure he had only to mention these facts

to so distinguished an assemblage of Masons to insure a response

which would greatly forward the prosperity of the institution."

INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL EXHIBITION.

_April 4th, 1870._

In everything pertaining to Exhibitions, national or international, the

Prince of Wales has never grown weary, even when the public interest has

seemed to flag. On the 4th of April, 1870, His Royal Highness presided

at the rooms of the Society of Arts, in connection with the "Educational

Section" of a series of proposed International Exhibitions. On rising to

open the proceedings, the Prince said:--

"We are assembled here for the purpose of organizing the

educational section of the Exhibition to be held in 1871. I

appear before you on this occasion in a double capacity, for I

hold the position of President of your Society, and I am

President of the Royal Commission of 1851, having succeeded in

this post the late lamented Lord Derby, whose name will always

be remembered among the names of our great statesmen, and who

will be greatly missed from that Commission, the interest of

which he had so much at heart.

"The long-standing connection of the Society of Arts with

Exhibitions is well known, and in these very rooms the

Exhibitions of 1851 and 1862 were first planned. This Society

is, I consider, well qualified to deal with the subject before

it, and I assure you that it is a great gratification to me to

preside here and show that I am entirely alive to the great

question of the day--that of education.

"I have now to state that the meeting to-day is of members of a

large Committee, of persons eminent in their various stations

for the interest they have displayed in education, and that it

has been appointed without reference to politics, party,

denomination, or social position, for the purpose of obtaining

the best possible representation in 1871 of the various

materials and apparatus used in teaching, and exhibiting, as far

as practicable, the results of the many systems of instruction

which are in operation in this country and in other nations of

the world. Under the first class we find such objects as affect

the sanitary condition of schools--the desks and stools used,

maps and globes, books, pictures, scientific diagrams, objects

of natural history, and the like. Under the second class will be

shown illustrations of modes of teaching, drawing, reading,

writing, music, and gymnastics, and the interesting work of

educating those whom nature has deprived of sight, speech, and

hearing, with examples of the successful results.

"In this Exhibition of Education, foreigners as well as British

subjects will take their share, and I am happy to say that

Sweden has already applied for permission to exhibit a

full-sized model of one of its parish schools. The duty of this

Committee is to see that such work as I have sketched out shall

be completely accomplished, that exhibitors shall come forward

and offer their productions, that the best only shall be

selected for exhibition, and that discussions on systems of

instruction shall be organized. I indulge a sanguine hope that

the labours of this Committee may teach lessons which will lead

to the improvement of the quality of primary education, and to

the extension of that secondary instruction in science and art

so much needed for the industrial progress of this country, a

necessity proved at the Exhibition of 1851, originated and

conducted by my illustrious father, and confirmed again in 1862,

and at Paris in 1867, where our own artisans showed by their

remarkable reports how strong were their convictions on this

point. Difficulties there are, as there must ever be, in the

completion of a great work, and here I am reminded how fully the

difficulties connected with this work of education were

appreciated by my father as long ago as 1851. But my visit with

the Princess of Wales to the Middle Class Schools in the City of

London on Wednesday last, and the reports on Faversham School

and the District Union Schools of the Metropolis, which have

been published by our Society, lead me on to hope that even

these difficulties may admit of solution.

"By improved organization of schools and teaching power, I think

that it is shown that instruction may be so given as to enable

earning and learning to go hand-in-hand together. I close these

few remarks by bidding 'God speed' to this Committee in the

great work that is before them. Two resolutions will be offered

for your acceptance, and any explanation which may seem

necessary will be afforded."

The resolutions, moved by Sir John Pakington, and by the Hon. W. Cowper

Temple, were to the effect that the meeting warmly approved of the

proposed International Educational Exhibition, which would not only

receive His Royal Highness's sanction, but his personal assistance and

co-operation. It was explained that the feature of these Exhibitions

would be the arrangement of objects illustrating the progress of art and

industry, not according to countries, but according to classes. On the

proposal of a vote of thanks to the chairman of the meeting, the Prince

said:--

"I require and desire no thanks at all. It has given me great

pleasure to be here to open the proceedings, and I cordially

thank all the gentlemen who have so kindly supported me on this

occasion. I beg again to assure you that I take a very deep

interest in this question--that of education, and that I shall

be always ready to give my hearty co-operation on a subject of

this important bearing."

ROYAL GENERAL THEATRICAL FUND.

_May 16th, 1870._

This Fund grants relief in annuities to members of the dramatic

profession, to singers and dancers, and also to the widows and orphans

of members. At present, upwards of £2000 annually is paid to fifty

annuitants. The invested capital is about £12,000. The institution has

the merit of not being a mere charity, but is largely supported by the

actors themselves. In this respect it holds a more honourable position

than even the Royal Literary Fund; no attempt to establish a guild for

mutual help among men of letters having, as yet, been successful.

The Theatrical Fund was established as long ago as 1839 by a few actors,

and was incorporated by Royal charter in 1853. Part of the income comes

from subscribers to the fund; but it is necessary also to appeal to the

public, in the method common to all charities; the resources of the

profession not being sufficient to maintain a mutual insurance society

on financial unaided by benevolent principles.

His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales presided at the 25th anniversary

festival of the Fund at St. James's Hall on the 16th of May, 1870. There

was a large attendance, including the leading members of the profession,

and some zealous supporters of the drama, among whom were the Nawab

Nazim of Bengal, with his two sons, the Princes Ali and Suleiman. Grace

having been sung after dinner the Prince gave "The Health of Her Majesty

the Queen," the patroness of this institution, and an annual subscriber

to its funds. The Duke of Sutherland, in proposing the health of "The

Prince and Princess of Wales, and other members of the Royal Family,"

adverted to the constant support given by their Royal Highnesses to the

drama.

The Prince of Wales, in returning thanks, said "he rejoiced that

ever since his childhood he had had opportunities of going to

the theatre and witnessing some of the most excellent plays, and

appreciating the performances of some of the best actors of the

present day, many of whom he saw on either side and before him

on this occasion. The few remarks he had to make regarding this

most excellent fund must be reserved till a later period of the

evening, and therefore he would not then detain the company; but

he must observe that not only had the Princess and himself

derived considerable amusement from what they had witnessed at

the theatres, but they had given their patronage to the drama

because it was their wish to encourage a noble profession."

The usual toast of the Army, Navy, and Volunteers having been given and

responded to, the Prince rose, and said:--

"The toast which he had now to propose was the so-called toast

of the evening, which was 'Prosperity to the Royal General

Theatrical Fund.' It afforded him great pleasure to propose this

toast, and when he saw the numerous assembly before him he felt

no doubt of the great interest taken by all present in this

excellent charity. What charity, he asked, could be more

deserving of support? When they considered how much amusement

and pleasure they all derived by going to the theatre, did it

ever occur to them that it was to the actors and actresses a

life of drudgery and hardship? Those same actors and actresses

who appeared in some comic character might have near and dear

relations lying sick at home. Then, also, when a time of life

arrived in the course of nature in which they were unable longer

to appear upon the stage ought they to be left to starve?

Certainly not, and it was to prevent aged actors who were

incapable of work from starving, that this fund had been

instituted.

"This charity was still more meritorious, because it was

supported by the actors themselves. The charity was established

in 1839 by a few London actors, and in 1853 it was incorporated

by Royal charter. The fund was raised to provide annuities for

aged and decayed members of the charity, and in special cases

for granting temporary assistance to the families of deceased

members. Any member of the profession, on the payment of a small

annual subscription, ranging from 21_s._ 4_d._ to £28 9_s._ a

year, according to a special scale, provided he had been

performing three years in a theatre licensed by the Lord

Chamberlain or by the local magistrates, was eligible to receive

the benefits of the fund, but no member had a claim unless he

had been a subscriber for seven years. Should he then be

incapacitated from further work, he had the option of either

receiving a life annuity or one-half the payments made by him

while a subscriber. On his death an allowance of £10 was granted

towards defraying funeral expenses. At 60 years of age any

member was at liberty to claim an annuity if he had subscribed

to the fund for 12 years, and female members were allowed to

cease their subscriptions when 55 years old. Since the opening

of the charity 322 members of the profession had been admitted

associates. To 61 of these life pensions had been granted,

varying from £30 to £90 a year. In 1846, the first year in which

pensions were granted, the receipts amounted to £565, and the

annuities to £98. Last year the total income was £1370, and the

amount expended in pensions was £1614. The receipts of 1869

therefore exceeded those of 1846 by £805, and the pensions, &c.,

by £1516. Again, while in 1846 only seven members received

annuities, the number of annuitants had increased to 33 in 1869.

The total disbursements, however, of last year exceeded the

income by £368, and it had been found necessary therefore to

draw that sum from the reserve fund.

"These few remarks would perhaps induce those who heard him to

come forward liberally to the assistance of the charity, and to

make up the £300 which it had been necessary to draw from the

reserve fund. His Royal Highness concluded by calling upon the

company to drink 'Prosperity to the General Theatrical Fund,'

coupled with the name of one who, he was sure, they would

receive with the greatest enthusiasm, as he was one of their

oldest and ablest actors. He had known Mr. Buckstone personally

ever since his childhood, and had repeatedly laughed and roared

at his drollery and humour."

Mr. Buckstone made a very amusing and characteristic speech, but with

good sense underlying the drollery. With regard to the presence of the

Prince in the chair, he said: "That His Royal Highness is a constant and

warm supporter of the drama is evident from his frequent visits with the

Princess to all the London theatres, and his ready appreciation of every

worthy novelty. This taste for the drama may in some measure be

attributed to his early introduction to dramatic art at Windsor Castle,

where, on having the honour of appearing there by invitation of Her

Majesty and the lamented Prince Consort, I have frequently seen His

Royal Highness with his brothers and sisters, seated at the feet of

their father and mother, witnessing with delight the various

representations.

"The members of our fund cannot be too grateful for the kindness and

goodness of heart which have induced His Royal Highness to come here

to-night, as the calls upon his time have now become so many, and the

duties he has to perform so numerous and fatiguing, that we can only

wonder how he gets through them all. Even within these few days he has

held a levée; on Saturday last he patronized a performance at Drury-lane

in aid of the Dramatic College; then had to run away to Freemasons'-hall

to be present at the installation of the Grand Master; and now we find

him in the chair this evening; so what with _conversaziones_, laying

foundation stones, opening schools, and other calls upon his little

leisure, I think he may be looked upon as one of the hardest working men

in Her Majesty's dominions. Still, it is this ready kindness that

endears him to the nation, as the Princess, by her charming qualities,

is so firmly fixed in the heart of every Englishman and Englishwoman.

"And now, my Lords, Ladies, and Gentlemen, I must inform you that Her

Gracious Majesty has again sent us her handsome donation of £100; and

although, unfortunately, she does not now visit our theatres, yet she

does not forget us; and so, my Lords, Ladies, and Gentlemen, with such a

truly Royal example before you, I can only conclude by hoping that,

according to your generous feelings and your worldly means, you will

come and do likewise."

Lord W. Lennox proposed "The Visitors," coupling with it the health of

the Nawab Nazim of Bengal, who during his residence in England had

identified himself with the charities of this country. The Nawab had

been a liberal patron of theatrical performances, and had, he

understood, only one subject of regret in connection with our London

theatres--that the plays of Shakespeare were not more frequently

performed in them. The subscriptions of the evening amounted to £700,

including £100 from the Prince of Wales, and £50 from the Nawab Nazim of

Bengal.

ST. GEORGE'S HOSPITAL.

_May 26th, 1870._

On the 26th of May, 1870, a public meeting was held at the Queen's

Concert Rooms, Hanover Square, in aid of the funds of St. George's

Hospital, especially with the view of enabling the Governors to open the

wards of the new wing. The meeting was one of unusual interest, not only

from the wide publicity given to the claims of the institution, but also

from the announcement that His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales would

preside, and from the high distinction of the speakers who were to take

part in the proceedings. The Princess of Wales manifested her interest

in the charity by accompanying the Prince to the meeting. The room was

densely crowded, and a number of distinguished persons were in the

company.

His Royal Highness, on taking the chair, said:--

"My Lords, Ladies, and Gentlemen,--Before opening the

proceedings of this meeting, allow me to express to you the

satisfaction I have in being able to accept the invitation to

preside at a meeting to-day which has for its aim such excellent

and important objects. We are met here to-day to discuss whether

it is expedient to open the new wing that has been added to St.

George's Hospital. Last year a meeting was held for the same

purpose for which we are met to-day, and it was then thought

that the subscriptions, although they were to a great extent

liberal subscriptions, were not sufficient in amount to

authorize the Governors of the Hospital to open the new wing. It

has also been much discussed whether it was not an extravagance

on the part of the authorities to build this new wing. I must

say--and I think I speak for those on my right and left--that

the authorities did perfectly right in building that wing, as a

piece of ground had been presented to them at a nominal rent by

the late lamented Marquis of Westminster, who always came

forward voluntarily to assist any great and important work.

Besides that, a further sum of £5000 was given by Miss Williams

to the building fund.

"As regards this wing, we all know that St. George's Hospital

lies near the South-Western and Great Western districts. We also

know that it lies within the precincts of Kensington, Mayfair,

and Belgravia. One would have thought that there would have

been no difficulty, and that the large number of inhabitants in

those parts, who are increasing monthly, and even weekly, would

have been able to come forward and contribute sufficiently to

this excellent institution.

"It has been said that the Hospital of St. George is a rich one,

but that is a great mistake. One would indeed think that it

would be rich from its important position, and when one

remembers how full its wards invariably are. To go back to the

new wing. After all, it is not a very large sum that is required

to maintain these wards. The sum only amounts to £2500 a year.

Is it not, therefore, a scandal, ladies and gentlemen, that for

the sake of this small sum we cannot use forty-eight beds in

that wing? The Hospital itself is in want of money, as I will

prove by stating that last year the expenditure amounted to as

much as £20,000, while the income was only £15,000. In order,

therefore, to make up the deficiency, £5000 had to be sold out

of capital. That will be the case this year, and it may be the

same in future years. The capital thus diminishing, the income

will naturally be smaller, and in that way this excellent

Hospital, which is most admirably cared for, which has the very

best surgeons and physicians--one of whom, Mr. Prescott Hewett,

I know personally--will sustain a yearly diminution of its

usefulness. In this way, if the public do not come forward

liberally we shall see one of the most excellent and important

hospitals in London becoming, year by year, in a more difficult

position with regard to funds.

"I am here to state what I am not sure is known to all of you,

that, with the exception of one hospital, the average cost of

beds at the St. George's Hospital is less than in any other

hospital in London. The authorities of the Hospital are not even

satisfied with that, and, I believe, intend to appoint a

committee to inquire still more closely and rigidly into the

expenditure, in order to do their utmost to lessen that

expenditure.

"My Lords, Ladies, and Gentlemen,--The address I have to make to

you is brief. I feel convinced that the gentlemen on this

platform will advocate the claims of the Hospital in longer,

more detailed, and more able statements than I have made; but I

am sure that none can feel more strongly than I do the

importance of this meeting. I feel certain also that the public

at large, if they will only take the trouble to reflect, will

come to our aid. Only to-day I read an excellent leading article

in the _Times_ in support of the objects of this meeting. I

thank you once more for the kind way in which you have received

me, but let me say before I sit down that a most excellent

example has been set us by a lady who has consented to give the

sum of £1000 for the maintenance of a ward for the space of two

years. Let this example not be lost upon us. Let us all try to

follow it, and liberally open our purses for the sake of an

institution of such value and importance to all of us who live

in this part of London."

The Earl of Cadogan, one of the Treasurers, announced that the Prince of

Wales had just handed to him a cheque for two hundred guineas. The

Princess of Wales had also given a donation of fifty guineas. Miss Read

had given £500, and the Marquis of Westminster a subscription of £200 a

year. Mr. Prescott Hewett, the surgeon, gave a hundred guineas, and

other liberal donations and subscriptions were announced, amounting to

upwards of £2000.

The principal speakers at the meeting were Earl Granville, the Earl of

Derby, the Earl of Carnarvon, Mr. W. H. Smith, the Marquis of

Westminster, and the Rev. H. Howarth, Rector of St. George's, Hanover

Square.

The Marquis of Westminster, in his admirable speech moving the thanks of

the meeting to the Chairman, said that he happened to be in Milan a

short time ago, and, going over a great hospital there, containing

something like 3000 beds, he saw in different rooms portraits of the

benefactors of the institution--some full length, others three-quarters,

some half-length, and others only heads. On inquiring the reason of this

distinction, he was informed that the size of the picture depended upon

the amount of the sum given by the donor. One who gave, say £4000, had

his portrait painted full length, while the others were represented

half-length, or even by a head.... It might be thought a light and easy

thing to come forward and make so excellent a speech as His Royal

Highness had done; but he was quite sure that if any who thought thus

would come forward to try, they would find themselves mistaken. In

coming forward in this work of benevolence, His Royal Highness was

fairly entitled to the warm and cordial thanks, not only of the

governors of the hospital, but of the whole nation. He begged to include

in this vote the Princess of Wales.

His Royal Highness said:--

"My Lords, Ladies, and Gentlemen,--Allow me to return you all my

most cordial thanks for the kind way in which you have supported

me by your presence, and to my noble friend for the way in

which he proposed the resolution. Not wishing to keep you here

any longer, let me only urge you to be as liberal as you can,

and I hope that the excellent speeches we have heard to-day may

impress you with the importance of this meeting, and with the

feeling that those speeches have been made not as a mere form,

but as real and earnest appeals to you to open your purses most

liberally. Lord Westminster has just alluded to the hospital at

Milan and to the portraits of different sizes, according to the

amount of money subscribed by the originals. I have but one

suggestion to make to you in that respect, and one to which I am

sure you will respond--that you should all contribute very

largely that circular golden portrait representative of the

Queen which this Hospital so much needs."

DULWICH COLLEGE.

_June 21st, 1870._

Speeches and Addresses of H. R. H. the Prince of Wales: 1863-1888 · 第 9 / 41 段