I annex the correspondence with General Frederick D. Grant:

BOSTON, MASS., _May_ 28, 1897.

COL. FRED. D. GRANT, NEW YORK, N. Y.

_Dear Sir:_ You will of course recall the fact that John Russell Young,

some months ago, made a public statement in which he declared that he

brought from Galena to Chicago, during the session of the Republican

Convention of 1880, a letter from General Grant in which he gave

specific directions to Conkling, Cameron, and Boutwell to withdraw his

name as a candidate from the convention. Some months ago I had some

correspondence with A. R. Conkling, and also with yourself, in regard

to the contents of the letter written by General Grant. Mr. A. R.

Conkling sent me a copy of a portion of a letter which, as he advised

me, he had received from you. A copy of that extract I herewith

enclose. As one of the friends of General Grant and as one of the

persons to whom bad faith was imputed by Mr. Young, it is my purpose to

place the matter before the public with such evidence as I can

command, for the purpose of showing the character of the letter.

I wish to obtain from you such a statement as you are willing to make,

with the understanding that whenever the case shall be presented to the

public your letter may be used.

Aside from actual evidence tending to show that Young's statement is

erroneous, I cannot believe that General Grant would have recognized

as a friend either one of the persons named, if his explicit

instructions for the withdrawal of his name had been made by him and

disregarded by them.

Yours very truly,

GEO S. BOUTWELL.

25 EAST 62D STREET,

NEW YORK, _May_ 30, 1897.

_My Dear Senator:_ I received yesterday your letter of May 28th, in

which you asked me what I remember about a letter which my father,

General Grant, wrote to his four leading friends during the session of

the Republican National Convention at Chicago in 1880.

With reference to this matter my recollection is, that Mr. John Russell

Young, who had been visiting father in Galena, brought from him a

large sealed envelope, which he delivered to me at my home in Chicago,

with directions from my father that I should read the letter contained

therein, and then see that it was received safely by his four friends,

Senators Conkling, Boutwell, Cameron, and Logan.

The substance of General Grant's letter was, that the personal feelings

of partisans of the leading candidates had grown to be so bitter, that

it might become advisable for the good of the Republican Party to

select as their candidate some one whose name had not yet been

prominently before the convention, and that he therefore wrote to say

to those who represented his interest in the convention, that it would

be quite satisfactory to him if they would confer with those who

represented the interests of Mr. Blaine and decided to have both his

name and Mr. Blaine's withdrawn from before the convention.

I delivered in person this letter from my father, to Senator Conkling--

I do not know what disposition he made of it.

With highest regards, my dear Senator, for your family and yourself,

believe me, as ever,

Faithfully yours,

FREDERICK D. GRANT.

Following the visit of General Grant and Mr. Conkling to Mentor in the

autumn of 1880, I was informed by Mr. Conkling that he had not been

alone one minute with General Garfield, intending by that care-taking

to avoid the suggestion that his visit was designed to afford an

opportunity for any personal or party arrangement. Further, it was the

wish of General Grant, as it was his wish, that the effort which they

were then making should be treated as a service due to the party and to

the country, and that General Garfield should be left free from any

obligation to them whatsoever.

After the election and after Mr. Blaine became Secretary of State, he

volunteered to speak of the situation of the party in New York and of

Mr. Conkling's standing in the State. Among other things, he said that

Mr. Conkling was the only man who had had three elections to the Senate,

and that Mr. Conkling and his friends would be considered fairly in

the appointments that might be made in that State.

When in a conversation with Conkling, I mentioned Blaine's remark, he

said, "Do you believe one word of that?"

Reminiscences of Sixty Years in Public Affairs, Vol. 2 · 第 38 / 54 题