MR. LINCOLN AND THE ATTACK ON FORT SUMTER

The testimony of John Minor Botts of Virginia, given before the Joint

Committee on Reconstruction, February 18, 1866, presents Mr. Lincoln as

a diplomatist at the outset of his experience as President.

Mr. Botts had been a leading member of the Whig Party and he was a

Union man from the beginning of the contest to the end of the war. As

the work of secession was advancing in the Gulf States Mr. Lincoln

became anxious for the fate of the border States and especially for

Virginia and Kentucky, which promised to serve as barriers to the

aggressive movements of the South in case of war. Mr. Botts came to

Washington at the request of Mr. Lincoln in the early days of April,

1861, and they were together and in private conversation during the

evening of the 7th of April from seven to eleven o'clock. In the

conversation of that evening the President gave Mr. Botts an account

of the steps that he had taken to prevent a collision in the harbor

of Charleston.

Mr. Summers and Mr. Baldwin of Virginia had been delegates in the Peace

Congress and they had been counted among the Union men of the State.

Soon after the inauguration the President was informed that the small

garrison in Fort Sumter was nearly destitute of provisions and that

an attempt to add to the supply would be resisted. The President,

Mr. Summers and Mr. Botts had served together as Whigs in the Thirtieth

Congress and the President invited Mr. Summers by letter and by special

messenger to a conference in Washington. To this invitation no

answer was given by Mr. Summers until the 5th of April, when Mr.

Baldwin appeared and said that he had come upon the request of Mr.

Summers. Mr. Lincoln said at once: "Ah! Mr. Baldwin, why did you

not come sooner? I have been expecting you gentlemen to come to me

for more than a week past. I had a most important proposition to make

to you. I am afraid you have come too late. However, I will make the

proposition now. We have in Fort Sumter with Major Anderson about

eighty men and I learn from Major Anderson that his provisions are

nearly exhausted . . . I have not only written to Governor Pickens, but

I have sent a special messenger to say that if he will allow Major

Anderson to obtain his marketing at the Charleston market, or, if he

objects to allowing our people to land at Charleston, if he will have

it sent to him, then I will make no effort to provision the fort, but,

that if he does not do that, I will not permit these people to starve,

and that I shall send provisions down,--and that if fires on that

vessel he will fire upon an unarmed vessel, loaded with nothing but

bread but I shall at the same time send a fleet along with her, with

instructions not to enter the harbor of Charleston unless the vessel

is fired into; and if she is, then the fleet is to enter the harbor

and protect her. Now, Mr. Baldwin, that fleet is now lying in the

harbor of New York and will be ready to sail this afternoon at five

o'clock, and although I fear it is almost too late, yet I will submit

anyway the proposition which I intended for Mr. Summers. Your

convention in Richmond, Mr. Baldwin, has been sitting now nearly two

months and all they have done has been to shake the rod over my head.

You have recently taken a vote in the Virginia Convention, on the right

of secession, which was rejected by ninety to forty-five, a majority

of two thirds, showing the strength of the Union Party in that

convention; and, if you will go back to Richmond and get that Union

majority to adjourn and go home without passing the ordinance of

secession, so anxious am I for the preservation of the peace of this

country and to save Virginia and the other States from going out, that

I will take the responsibility of evacuating Fort Sumter, and take the

chance of negotiating with the cotton States, which have already gone

out."

This quotation is from the testimony of Mr. Botts and there cannot be

better evidence of the facts existing in the first days of April, nor

a more trustworthy statement of the position of Mr. Lincoln in regard

to the secession movement. At that time the Virginia Convention had

rejected a proposed ordinance of secession by a vote of ninety to

forty-five, and there can be no doubt that Mr. Lincoln had hopes that

his proposition might calm the temper and change the purposes of the

secessionists in that State if he did not change the schemes of

Governor Pickens, of which, indeed, the prospect was only slight.

In his Inaugural Address, and in all his other public utterances, Mr.

Lincoln sought to place the responsibility of war upon the seceding

States. At a later day Mr. Lincoln, in a conversation with Senator

Sumner and myself, expressed regret that he had neglected to station

troops in Virginia in advance of the occupation of the vicinity of

Alexandria by the Confederates, a course of action to which he had

been urged by Mr. Chase and others.

Mr. Lincoln's proposition for the relief of Fort Sumter was rejected

by Mr. Baldwin, as was the proposition for the adjournment of the

convention, _sine die_.

When Mr. Botts appeared the time had passed when arrangements could

have been made for the relief of Sumter and the adjournment of the

convention. Although the situation may not have been realized at the

time it was not the less true that Mr. Botts and the small number

of Union men in Virginia were powerless in presence of the movement

in favor of secession under the lead of Tyler, Seddon and others.

The political side of Mr. Lincoln's character is seen in the fact that

he enjoined secrecy upon Mr. Botts. He may have been unwilling to

allow his supporters in the North to know how far he had gone in the

line of conciliation. In the conversation with Mr. Baldwin, Mr.

Lincoln had given an assurance that upon the acceptance of his two

propositions he would evacuate Fort Sumter. When Mr. Lincoln made

these facts known to Mr. Botts at the evening interview, Mr. Botts

said; "Will you authorize me to make that proposition to the Union

men of the convention? I will take a steamboat to-morrow morning,

and have a meeting of the Union men to-morrow night, I will guarantee

with my head, that they will adopt your proposition." In reply, Mr.

Lincoln said: "It is too late. The fleet has sailed." In truth it

was too late for the acceptance of the propositions in Virginia. The

Union men were powerless, and the secessionists were dominant in

affairs and already vindictive. The charge that Mr. Seward gave a

promise that Sumter would be abandoned, may or it may not have been

true, but there can be no ground for doubting the statement made by

Mr. Botts in regard to the terms tendered by Mr. Lincoln, and which

were rejected by Mr. Baldwin.

Mr. Baldwin admitted the interview with Mr. Lincoln, and the nature of

it as herein given, to Mr. John F. Lewis, who was a Union man and a

member of the convention that adopted the Ordinance of Secession by

a vote of eighty-eight to fifty-five.

Of the three witnesses, Baldwin, Botts and Lewis, Mr. Baldwin was the

first witness who was examined by the Committee on Reconstruction.

At that time the committee had no knowledge of the conversation

between Mr. Baldwin and President Lincoln. Speaking, apparently, under

the influence of the criticisms of Botts and Lewis of his rejection of

Mr. Lincoln's propositions, Baldwin introduced the subject with the

remark: "I had a good deal of interesting conversation with him (that

is with Mr. Lincoln) that evening. I was about to state that I have

reason to believe that Mr. Lincoln himself had given an account of

this conversation which has been understood--but I am sure

_mis_understood--by the persons with whom he talked, as giving the

representation of it, that he had offered to me, that if the Virginia

Convention would adjourn _sine die_ he would withdraw the troops from

Sumner and _Pickens_." As there was no occasion in the conversation

between Lincoln and Baldwin for a reference to Fort Pickens, and as the

President did not mention _Fort Pickens_ in the account of the

conversation that he gave to Mr. Botts, the denial of Mr. Baldwin may

fall under one of the forms of falsehood mentioned by Shakespeare.

The evidence is conclusive to this point: That at an interview at the

Executive Mansion, April 5, 1861, between President Lincoln and Colonel

John B. Baldwin, then a member of the Virginia Convention that finally

adopted the Ordinance of Secession, President Lincoln assured Mr.

Baldwin that he would evacuate Fort Sumter if the fort could be

provisioned and the Virginia Convention would adjourn _sine die_.

Colonel Baldwin's voluntary and qualified denial is of no value in

presence of President Lincoln's report of the interview as given by

Mr. Botts and in presence of the testimony that Mr. Baldwin did not

deny the truthfulness of Mr. Botts' limited statement, when it was

asserted by Mr. Botts in the presence of Lewis.

Reminiscences of Sixty Years in Public Affairs, Vol. 2 · 第 12 / 54 题