1. LIMITATIONS OF INQUIRY.

And now, before entering upon an examination of the Bible text, in

the light of these disclosures of primitive and universal customs, it

may be well for me to say, that I purpose no attempt to include or to

explain all the philosophy of sacrifice, and of the involved atonement.

All my thought is, to ascertain what new meaning, if any, is found in

the Bible teachings concerning the uses and the symbolism of blood,

through our better understanding of the prevailing idea, among the

peoples of the ancient world, that blood represents life; that the

giving of blood represents the giving of life; that the receiving of

blood represents the receiving of life; that the inter-commingling

of blood represents the inter-commingling of natures; and that a

divine-human inter-union through blood is the basis of a divine-human

inter-communion, in the sharing of the flesh of the sacrificial

offering as sacred food. Whatever other Bible teachings there are,

beyond these, as to the meanings of sacrifice, or as to the nature of

the atonement, it is not my purpose, in this investigation, to consider.

In the days of Moses, when the Pentateuch is supposed to have been

prepared, there were--as we have already found--certain well-defined

views, the world over, concerning the sacredness of blood, and

concerning the methods, the involvings, and the symbolisms, of the

covenant of blood. This being so, we are not to look to the Bible

record, as it stands, for the original institution of every rite

and ceremony connected with blood-shedding, blood-guarding, and

blood-using; but we may fairly look at every Bible reference to blood,

in the light of the primitive customs known to have prevailed in the

days of the Bible writing.

The Blood Covenant: A Primitive Rite and its Bearings on Scripture · 第 49 / 80 题