3. THE PRIMITIVE RITE IN AFRICA.

Travelers in the heart of Africa, also, report the covenant of

“blood-brotherhood,” or of “strong-friendship,” as in vogue among

various African tribes; although, naturally retaining less of primitive

sacredness there than among Semites. The rite is, in some cases,

observed after the manner of the Syrians, by the contracting parties

tasting each other’s blood; while, in other cases, it is performed by

the inter-transfusion of blood between the two.

The first mention which I find of it, in the writings of modern

travelers in Africa, is by the lamented hero-missionary, Dr.

Livingstone. He calls the rite _Kasendi_. It was in the region of

Lake Dilolo, at the watershed between the Indian Ocean and the

Atlantic, in July, 1854, that he made blood-friendship, vicariously,

with Queen Manenko, of the Balonda tribes.[13] She was represented,

in this ceremony, by her husband, the ebony “Prince Consort”; while

Livingstone’s representative was one of his Makololo attendants.

Woman’s right to rule--when she has the right--seems to be as clearly

recognized in Central Africa, to-day, as it was in Ethiopia in the days

of Candace, or in Sheba in the days of Balkees.

Describing the ceremony, Livingstone says:[14] “It is accomplished

thus: The hands of the parties are joined (in this case Pitsane and

Sambanza were the parties engaged). Small incisions are made on the

clasped hands, on the pits of the stomach of each, and on the right

cheeks and foreheads. A small quantity of blood is taken off from

these points, in both parties, by means of a stalk of grass. The blood

from one person is put into a pot of beer, and that of the second into

another; each then drinks the other’s blood, and they are supposed to

become perpetual friends, or relations. During the drinking of the

beer, some of the party continue beating the ground with short clubs,

and utter sentences by way of ratifying the treaty. The men belonging

to each [principal’s party], then finish the beer. The principals in

the performance of ‘Kasendi’ are henceforth considered blood-relations,

and are bound to disclose to each other any impending evil. If Sekeletu

[chief of Pitsane’s tribe--the Makololo--] should resolve to attack the

Balonda [Sambanza’s--or, more properly, Manenko’s--people], Pitsane

would be under obligation to give Sambanza warning to escape; and

so, on the other side. [The ceremony concluded in this case] they

now presented each other with the most valuable presents they had

to bestow. Sambanza walked off with Pitsane’s suit of green baize

faced with red, which had been made in Loanda; and Pitsane, besides

abundant supplies of food, obtained two shells [of as great value, in

regions far from the sea, ‘as the Lord Mayor’s badge is in London,’]

similar to that [one, which] I had received from Shinte [the uncle of

Manenko].”[15]

Of the binding force of this covenant, Livingstone says farther: “On

one occasion I became blood-relation to a young woman by accident. She

had a large cartilaginous tumor between the bones of the forearm, which

as it gradually enlarged, so distended the muscles as to render her

unable to work. She applied to me to excise it. I requested her to

bring her husband, if he were willing to have the operation performed;

and while removing the tumor, one of the small arteries squirted some

blood into my eye. She remarked, when I was wiping the blood out of it,

‘You were a friend before; now you are a blood-relation; and when you

pass this way always send me word, that I may cook food for you.’”[16]

Of the influence of these inter-tribal blood-friendships, in Central

Africa, Dr. Livingstone speaks most favorably. Their primitive

character is made the more probable, in view of the fact that he first

found them existing in a region where, in his opinion, the dress and

household utensils of the people are identical with those which are

represented on the monuments of ancient Egypt.[17] Although it is

within our own generation that this mode of covenanting in the region

referred to, has been made familiar to us, the rite itself is of old,

elsewhere if not, indeed, there; as other travelers following in the

track of Livingstone have noted and reported.

Commander Cameron, who, while in charge of the Livingstone Search

Expedition, was the first European traveler to cross the whole breadth

of the African continent in its central latitudes, gives several

illustrations of the observance of this rite. In June, 1874, at the

westward of Lake Tanganyika, Syde, a guide of Cameron, entered into

this covenant of blood with Pakwanya, a local chief.

“After a certain amount of palaver,” says Cameron, “Syde and Pakwanya

exchanged presents, much to the advantage of the former [for in

the East, the person of higher rank is supposed to give the more

costly gifts in any such exchange]; more especially [in this case]

as he [Syde] borrowed the beads of me and afterward forgot to repay

me. Pakwanya then performed a tune on his harmonium, or whatever

the instrument [which he had] might be called, and the business of

fraternizing was proceeded with. Pakwanya’s head man acted as his

sponsor, and one of my askari assumed the like office for Syde.

“The first operation consisted of making an incision on each of their

right wrists, just sufficient to draw blood; a little of which was

scraped off and smeared on the other’s cut; after which gunpowder

was rubbed in [thereby securing a permanent token on the arm]. The

concluding part of the ceremony was performed by Pakwanya’s sponsor

holding a sword resting on his shoulder, while he who acted [as

sponsor] for Syde went through the motions of sharpening a knife upon

it. Both sponsors meanwhile made a speech, calling down imprecations

on Pakwanya and all his relations, past, present, and future, and

prayed that their graves might be defiled by pigs if he broke the

brotherhood in word, thought, or deed. The same form having been gone

through with, [with] respect to Syde, the sponsors changing duties, the

brother-making was complete.”[18]

Concerning the origin of this rite, in this region, Cameron says: “This

custom of ‘making brothers,’ I believe to be really of Semitic origin,

and to have been introduced into Africa by the heathen Arabs before the

days of Mohammed; and this idea is strengthened by the fact that when

the first traders from Zanzibar crossed the Tanganyika, the ceremony

was unknown [so far as those traders knew] to the westward of that

lake.”[19] Cameron was, of course, unaware of the world-wide prevalence

of this rite; but his suggestion that its particular form just here

had a Semitic origin, receives support in a peculiar difference noted

between the Asiatic and the African ceremonies.

It will be remembered, that, among the Syrians, the blood of the

covenant is taken into the mouth, and the record of the covenant is

bound upon the arm. The Africans, not fully appreciating the force of

a written record, are in the habit of reversing this order, according

to Cameron’s account. Describing the rite as observed between his

men and the natives, on the Luama River, he says: “The brotherhood

business having been completed [by putting the blood from one party on

to the arm of the other], some pen and ink marks were made on a piece

of paper, which, together with a charge of powder, was put into a

kettleful of water. All hands then drank of the decoction, the natives

being told that it was a very great medicine.”[20] That was “drinking

the covenant”[21] with a vengeance; nor is it difficult to see how this

idea originated.

The gallant and adventurous Henry M. Stanley also reports this rite of

“blood-brotherhood,” or of “strong friendship,” in the story of his

romantic experiences in the wilds of Africa. On numerous occasions

the observance of this rite was a means of protection and relief to

Stanley. One of its more notable illustrations was in his compact with

“Mirambo, the warrior chief of Western Unyamwezi;”[22] whose leadership

in warfare Stanley compares to that of both Frederick the Great[23] and

Napoleon.[24]

It was during his first journey in pursuit of Livingstone, in 1871,

that Stanley first encountered the forces of Mirambo, and was worsted

in the conflict.[25] Writing of him, after his second expedition,

Stanley describes Mirambo, as “the ‘Mars of Africa,’ who since 1871 has

made his name feared by both native and foreigner from Usui to Urori,

and from Uvinza to Ugogo, a country embracing 90,000 square miles;

who, from the village chieftainship over Uyoweh, has made for himself

a name as well known as that of Mtesa throughout the eastern half of

Equatorial Africa; a household word from Nyangwé to Zanzibar, and the

theme of many a song of the bards of Unyamwezi, Ukimbu, Ukonongo,

Uzinja, and Uvinza.”[26] For a time, during his second exploring

expedition, Stanley was inclined to avoid Mirambo, but becoming

“impressed with his ubiquitous powers,”[27] he decided to meet him,

and if possible make “strong friendship” with him. They came together,

first, at Serombo, April 22, 1876. Mirambo “quite captivated” Stanley.

“He was a thorough African _gentleman_ in appearance.... A handsome,

regular-featured, mild-voiced, soft-spoken man, with what one might

call a ‘meek’ demeanor; very generous and open-handed;” his eyes having

“the steady, calm gaze of a master.”[28]

The African hero and the heroic American agreed to “make strong

friendship” with each other. Stanley thus describes the ceremony:

“Manwa Sera [Stanley’s ‘chief captain’] was requested to seal our

friendship by performing the ceremony of blood-brotherhood between

Mirambo and myself. Having caused us to sit fronting each other on

a straw-carpet, he made an incision in each of our right legs, from

which he extracted blood, and inter-changing it, he exclaimed aloud:

‘If either of you break this brotherhood now established between you,

may the lion devour him, the serpent poison him, bitterness be in his

food, his friends desert him, his gun burst in his hands and wound

him, and everything that is bad do wrong to him until death.’”[29] The

same blood now flowed in the veins of both Stanley and Mirambo. They

were friends and brothers in a sacred covenant; life for life. At the

conclusion of the covenant, they exchanged gifts; as the customary

ratification, or accompaniment, of the compact. They even vied with

each other in proofs of their unselfish fidelity, in this new covenant

of friendship.[30]

Again and again, before and after this incident, Stanley entered into

the covenant of blood-brotherhood with representative Africans; in some

instances by the opening of his own veins; at other times by allowing

one of his personal escort to bleed for him. In January, 1875, a “great

magic doctor of Vinyata” came to Stanley’s tent to pay a friendly

visit, “bringing with him a fine, fat ox as a peace offering.” After

an exchange of gifts, says Stanley, “he entreated me to go through

the process of blood-brotherhood, which I underwent with all the

ceremonious gravity of a pagan.”[31]

Three months later, in April, 1875, when Stanley found himself and his

party in the treacherous toils of Shekka, the King of Bumbireh, he made

several vain attempts to “induce Shekka, with gifts, to go through the

process of blood-brotherhood.” Stanley’s second captain, Safeni, was

the adroit, but unsuccessful, agent in the negotiations. “Go frankly

and smilingly, Safeni, up to Shekka, on the top of that hill,” said

Stanley, “and offer him these three fundo of beads, and ask him to

exchange blood with you.” But the wily king was not to be dissuaded

from his warlike purposes in that way. “Safeni returned. Shekka had

refused the pledge of peace.”[32] His desire was to take blood, if at

all, without any exchange.

After still another three months, in July, 1875, Stanley, at Refuge

Island, reports better success in securing peace and friendship through

blood-giving and blood-receiving. “Through the influence of young

Lukanjah--the cousin of the King of Ukerewé”--he says, “the natives of

the mainland had been induced to exchange their churlish disposition

for one of cordial welcome; and the process of blood-brotherhood had

been formally gone through [with], between Manwa Sera, on my part,

and Kijaju, King of Komeh, and the King of Itawagumba, on the other

part.”[33]

It was at “Kampunzu, in the district of Uvinza, where dwell the true

aborigines of the forest country,”--a people whom Stanley afterwards

found to be cannibals--that this rite was once more observed between

the explorers and the natives. “Blood-brotherhood being considered as

a pledge of good-will and peace,” says Stanley, “Frank Pocock [a young

Englishman who was an attendant of Stanley] and the chief [of Kampunzu]

went through the ordeal; and we interchanged presents”--as is the

custom in the observance of this rite.[34]

At the island of Mpika, on the Livingstone River, in December, 1876,

there was another bright episode in Stanley’s course of travel, through

this mode of sealing friendship. Disease had been making sad havoc in

Stanley’s party. He had been compelled to fight his way along through

a region of cannibals. While he was halting for a breakfast on the

river bank over against Mpika, an attack on him was preparing by the

excited inhabitants of the island. Just then his scouts captured a

native trading party of men and women who were returning to Mpika,

from inland; and to them his interpreters made clear his pacific

intentions. “By means of these people,” he says, “we succeeded in

checking the warlike demonstrations of the islanders, and in finally

persuading them to make blood-brotherhood; after which we invited

canoes to come and receive [these hostages] their friends. As they

hesitated to do so, we embarked them in our own boat, and conveyed

them across to the island. The news then spread quickly along the

whole length of the island that we were friends, and as we resumed our

journey, crowds from the shore cried out to us, ‘_Mwendé Ki-vuké-vuké_’

(‘Go in peace!’)”[35]

Once more it was at the conclusion of a bloody conflict, in the

district of Vinya-Njara, just below Mpika Island, that peace was sealed

by blood. When practical victory was on Stanley’s side, at the cost

of four of his men killed, and thirteen more of them wounded, then

he sought this means of amity. “With the aid of our interpreters,”

he says, “we communicated our terms, viz., that we would occupy

Vinya-Njara, and retain all the canoes unless they made peace. We also

informed them that we had one prisoner, who would be surrendered to

them if they availed themselves of our offer of peace: that we had

suffered heavily, and they had also suffered; that war was an evil

which wise men avoided; that if they came with two canoes with their

chiefs, two canoes with our chiefs should meet them in mid-stream,

and make blood-brotherhood; and that on that condition some of their

canoes should be restored, and we would purchase the rest.” The natives

took time for the considering of this proposition, and then accepted

it. “On the 22nd of December, the ceremony of blood-brotherhood

having been formally concluded, in mid-river, between Safeni and the

chief of Vinya-Njara,” continues Stanley, “our captive, and fifteen

canoes, were returned, and twenty-three canoes were retained by

us for a satisfactory equivalent; and thus our desperate struggle

terminated.”[36]

On the Livingstone, just below the Equator, in February, 1877,

Stanley’s party was facing starvation, having been for some time

“unable to purchase food, or indeed [to] approach a settlement for any

amicable purpose.” The explorers came to look at “each other as fated

victims of protracted famine, or [of] the rage of savages, like those

of Mangala.” “We continued our journey,” goes on the record, “though

grievously hungry, past Bwena and Inguba, doing our utmost to induce

the staring fishermen to communicate with us; without any success. They

became at once officiously busy with guns, and dangerously active. We

arrived at Ikengo, and as we were almost despairing, we proceeded to a

small island opposite this settlement, and prepared to encamp. Soon a

canoe with seven men came dashing across, and we prepared our moneys

for exhibition. They unhesitatingly advanced, and ran their canoe

alongside of us. We were rapturously joyful, and returned them a most

cordial welcome, as the act was a most auspicious sign of confidence.

We were liberal, and the natives fearlessly accepted our presents;

and from this giving of gifts we proceeded to seal this incipient

friendship with our blood, with all due ceremony.”[37] And by this

transfusion of blood, the starving were re-vivified, and the despairing

were given hope.

Twice, again, within a few weeks after this experience, there was

a call on Stanley of blood for blood, in friendship’s compact. The

people of Chumbiri welcomed the travelers. “They readily subscribed

to all the requirements of friendship, blood-brotherhood, and an

exchange of a few small gifts.”[38] Itsi, the king of Ntamo, with

several of his elders and a showy escort, came out to meet Stanley;

and there was a friendly greeting on both sides. “They then broached

the subject of blood-brotherhood. We were willing,” says Stanley, “but

they wished to defer the ceremony until they had first shown their

friendly feelings to us.” Thereupon gifts were exchanged, and the

king indicated his preference for a “big goat” of Stanley’s, as his

benefaction--which, after some parleying, was transferred to him. Then

came the covenant-rite. “The treaty with Itsi,” says Stanley, “was

exceedingly ceremonious, and involved the exchange of charms. Itsi

transferred to me for my protection through life, a small gourdful of a

curious powder, which had rather a saline taste; and I delivered over

to him, as the white man’s charm against all evil, a half-ounce vial

of magnesia; further, a small scratch in Frank’s arm, and another in

Itsi’s arm, supplied blood sufficient to unite us in one, and [by an]

indivisible bond of fraternity.”[39]

Four years after this experience of blood-covenanting, by proxy, with

young Itsi, Stanley found himself again at Ntamo, or across the river

from it; this time in the interest of the International Association of

the Congo. Being short of food, he had sent out a party of foragers,

and was waiting their return with interest. “During the absence of

the food-hunters,” he says, “we heard the drums of Ntamo, and [we]

followed with interested eyes the departure of two large canoes from

the landing-place, their ascent to the place opposite, and their final

crossing over towards us. Then we knew that Ngalyema of Ntamo had

condescended to come and visit us. As soon as he arrived I recognized

him as the Itsi with whom, in 1877, I had made blood-brotherhood [by

proxy]. During the four years that had elapsed, he had become a great

man.... He was now about thirty-four years old, of well-built form,

proud in his bearing, covetous and grasping in disposition, and,

like all other lawless barbarians, prone to be cruel and sanguinary

whenever he might safely vent his evil humor. Superstition had found

in him an apt and docile pupil, and fetishism held him as one of its

most abject slaves. This was the man in whose hands the destinies of

the Association Internationale du Congo were held, and upon whose

graciousness depended our only hope of being able to effect a peaceful

lodgment on the Upper Congo.” A pagan African was an African pagan,

even while the blood-brother of a European Christian. Yet, the tie of

blood-covenanting was the strongest tie known in Central Africa. Frank

Pocock, whose covenant-blood flowed in Itsi’s veins, was dead;[40] yet

for his sake his master, Stanley, was welcomed by Itsi as a brother;

and in true Eastern fashion he was invited to prove anew his continuing

faith by a fresh series of love-showing gifts. “My brother being the

supreme lord of Ntamo, as well as the deepest-voiced and most arrogant

rogue among the whole tribe,” says Stanley, “first demanded the two

asses [which Stanley had with him], then a large mirror, which was

succeeded by a splendid gold-embroidered coat, jewelry, glass clasps,

long brass chains, a figured table-cloth, fifteen other pieces of fine

cloth, and a japanned tin box with a ‘Chubb’ lock. Finally, gratified

by such liberality, Ngalyema surrendered to me his sceptre, which

consisted of a long staff, banded profusely with brass, and decorated

with coils of brass wire, which was to be carried by me and shown to

all men that I was the brother of Ngalyema [or, Itsi] of Ntamo!”[41]

Some time after this, when trouble arose between Stanley and Ngalyema,

the former suggested that perhaps it would be better to cancel their

brotherhood. “‘No, no, no,’ cried Ngalyema, anxiously; ‘our brotherhood

cannot be broken; our blood is now one.’” Yet at this time Stanley’s

brotherhood with Ngalyema was only by the blood of his deceased

retainer, Frank Pocock.

More commonly, the rite of blood-friendship among the African tribes

seems to be by the inter-transfusion of blood; but the ancient Syrian

method is by no means unknown on that continent. Stanley tells of

one crisis of hunger, among the cannibals of Rubunga, when the

hostility of the natives on the river bank was averted by a shrewd

display of proffered trinkets from the boats of the expedition. “We

raised our anchor,” he says, “and with two strokes of the oars had

run our boat ashore; and, snatching a string or two of cowries [or

shell-money], I sprang on land, followed by the coxswain Uledi, and

in a second I had seized the skinny hand of the old chief, and was

pressing it hard for joy. Warm-hearted Uledi, who the moment before

was breathing furious hate of all savages, and of the procrastinating

old chief in particular, embraced him with a filial warmth. Young

Saywa, and Murabo, and Shumari, prompt as tinder upon all occasions,

grasped the lesser chiefs’ hands, and devoted themselves with smiles

and jovial frank bearing to conquer the last remnants of savage

sullenness, and succeeded so well that, in an incredible short time,

the blood-brotherhood ceremony between the suddenly formed friends was

solemnly entered into, and the irrevocable pact of peace and good will

had been accomplished.”[42]

Apparently unaware of the method of the ancient Semitic rite, here

found in a degraded form, Stanley seems surprised at the mutual tasting

of blood between the contracting friends, in this instance. He says:

“Blood-brotherhood was a beastly cannibalistic ceremony with these

people, yet much sought after,--whether for the satisfaction of their

thirst for blood, or that it involved an interchange of gifts, of which

they must needs reap the most benefit. After an incision was made

in each arm, both brothers bent their heads, and the aborigine was

observed to suck with the greatest fervor; whether for love of blood or

excess of friendship, it would be difficult to say.”[43]

During his latest visit to Africa, in the Congo region, Stanley

had many another occasion to enter into the covenant of blood with

native chiefs, or to rest on that covenant as before consummated. His

every description of the rite itself has its value, as illustrating

the varying forms and the essential unity of the ceremony of

blood-covenanting, the world over.

A reference has already been made[44] to Stanley’s meeting, on this

expedition, with Ngalyema, who, under the name of Itsi, had entered

into blood-brotherhood with Frank Pocock, four years before. That

brotherhood by proxy had several severe strains, in the progress of

negotiations between Stanley and Ngalyema; and after some eight months

of these varying experiences, it was urgently pressed on Stanley by the

chiefs of Kintamo (which is another name for Ntamo), that he should

personally covenant by blood with Ngalyema, and so put an end to all

danger of conflict between them. To this Stanley assented, and the

record of the transaction is given accordingly, under date of April

9, 1882: “Brotherhood with Ngalyema was performed. We crossed arms;

an incision was made in each arm; some salt was placed on the wound,

and then a mutual rubbing took place, while the great fetish man of

Kintamo pronounced an inconceivable number of curses on my head if ever

I proved false. Susi [Livingstone’s head man, now with Stanley], not

to be outdone by him, solicited the gods to visit unheard-of atrocious

vengeances on Ngalyema if he dared to make the slightest breach in

the sacred brotherhood which made him and Bula Matari[45] one and

indivisible for ever.”[46]

In June, 1883, Stanley visited, by invitation, Mangombo, the chief of

Irebu, on the Upper Congo, and became his blood-brother. Describing

his landing at this “Venice of the Congo,” he says: “Mangombo, with

a curious long staff, a fathom and a half in length, having a small

spade of brass at one end, much resembling a baker’s cake-spade, stood

in front. He was a man probably sixty years old, but active and by no

means aged-looking, and he waited to greet me.... Generally the first

day of acquaintance with the Congo river tribes is devoted to chatting,

sounding one another’s principles, and getting at one another’s ideas.

The chief entertains his guest with gifts of food, goats, beer, fish,

&c.; then, on the next day, commences business and reciprocal exchange

of gifts. So it was at Irebu. Mangombo gave four hairy thin-tailed

sheep, ten glorious bunches of bananas, two great pots of beer,

and the usual accompaniments of small stores. The next day we made

blood-brotherhood. The fetish-man pricked each of our right arms,

pressed the blood out; then, with a pinch of scrapings from my gun

stock, a little salt, a few dusty scrapings from a long pod, dropped

over the wounded arms, ... the black and white arms were mutually

rubbed together [for the inter-transfusion of the flowing blood]. The

fetish-man took the long pod in his hand, and slightly touched our

necks, our heads, our arms, and our legs, muttering rapidly his litany

of incantations. What was left of the medicine Mangombo and I carefully

folded in a banana leaf [Was this the ‘house of the amulet?’[47]], and

we bore it reverently between us to a banana grove close by, and buried

the dust out of sight. Mangombo, now my brother, by solemn interchange

of blood,--consecrated to my service, as I was devoted in the sacred

fetish bond to his service,--revealed his trouble, and implored my

aid.”[48]

Yet again, Stanley “made friendship” with the Bakuti, at Wangata,

“after the customary forms of blood-brotherhood”;[49] similarly with

two chiefs, Iuka and Mungawa, at Lukolela;[50] with Miyongo of

Usindi;[51] and with the chiefs of Bolombo;[52] of Yambinga,[53] of

Mokulu,[54] of Irungu,[55] of Upoto,[56] of Uranga;[57] and so all

along his course of travel. One of the fullest and most picturesque of

his descriptions of this rite, is in connection with its observance

with a son of the great chief of the Bangala, at Iboko; and the main

details of that description are worthy of reproduction here.

The Bangala, or “the Ashantees of the Livingstone River,” as Stanley

characterizes them, are a strong and a superior people, and they

fought fiercely against Stanley, when he was passing their country

in 1877.[58] “The senior chief, Mata Bwyki (lord of many guns), was

[now, in October, 1883,] an old grey-haired man,” says Stanley,

“of Herculean stature and breadth of shoulder, with a large square

face, and an altogether massive head, out of which his solitary eye

seemed to glare with penetrative power. I should judge him to be

six feet, two inches, in height. He had a strong, sonorous voice,

which, when lifted to speak to his tribe, was heard clearly several

hundred yards off. He was now probably between seventy-five and eighty

years old.... He was not the tallest man, nor the best looking, nor

the sweetest-dispositioned man, I had met in all Africa; but if the

completeness and perfection of the human figure, combining size with

strength, and proportion of body, limbs, and head, with an expression

of power in the face, be considered, he must have been at one time the

grandest type of physical manhood to be found in Equatorial Africa. As

he stood before us on this day, we thought of him as an ancient Milo,

an aged Hercules, an old Samson--a really grand looking old man. At his

side were seven tall sons, by different mothers, and although they were

stalwart men and boys, the whitened crown of Mata Bwyki’s head rose by

a couple of inches above the highest head.”

Nearly two thousand persons assembled, at Iboko, to witness the

“palaver” that must precede a decision to enter into “strong

friendship.” At the place of meeting, “mats of split rattan were

spread in a large semicircle around a row of curved and box stools,

for the principal chiefs. In the centre of the line, opposite this,

was left a space for myself and people,” continues Stanley. “We had

first to undergo the process of steady and silent examination from

nearly two thousand pairs of eyes. Then, after Yumbila, the guide,

had detailed in his own manner, who we were, and what was our mission

up the great river; how we had built towns at many places, and made

blood-brotherhood with the chiefs of great districts, such as Irebu,

Ukuti, Usindi, Ngombé, Lukolela, Bolobo, Mswata, and Kintamo, he urged

upon them the pleasure it would be to me to make a like compact, sealed

with blood, with the great chiefs of populous Iboko. He pictured the

benefits likely to accrue to Iboko, and Mata Bwyki in particular, if

a bond of brotherhood was made between two chiefs like Mata Bwyki and

Tandelay, [Stanley,] or as he was known, Bula Matari.”

There was no prompt response to Stanley’s request for strong friendship

with the Bangala. There were prejudices to be removed, and old memories

to be overborne; and Yumbila’s eloquence and tact were put to their

severest test, in the endeavor to bring about a state of feeling that

would make the covenant of blood a possibility here. But the triumph

was won. “A forked palm branch was brought,” says Stanley. “Kokoro, the

heir [of Mata Bwyki], came forward, seized it, and kneeled before me;

as, drawing out his short falchion, he cried, ‘Hold the other branch,

Bula Matari!’ I obeyed him, and lifting his hand he cleaved the branch

in two. ‘Thus,’ he said, ‘I declare my wish to be your brother.’

“Then a fetish-man came forward with his lancets, long pod, pinch

of salt, and fresh green banana leaf. He held the staff of Kokoro’s

sword-bladed spear, while one of my rifles was brought from the

steamer. The shaft of the spear and the stock of the rifle were then

scraped on the leaf, a pinch of salt was dropped on the wood, and

finally a little dust from the long pod was scraped on the curious

mixture. Then, our arms were crossed,--the white arm over the brown

arm,--and an incision was made in each; and over the blood was dropped

a few grains of the dusty compound; and the white arm was rubbed over

the brown arm [in the intermingling of blood].”

“Now Mata Bwyki lifted his mighty form, and with his long giant’s staff

drove back the compressed crowd, clearing a wide circle, and then

roaring out in his most magnificent style, leonine in its lung-force,

kingly in its effect: ‘People of Iboko! You by the river side, and you

of inland. Men of the Bangala, listen to the words of Mata Bwyki. You

see Tandelay before you. His other name is Bula Matari. He is the man

with the many canoes, and has brought back strange smoke-boats. He has

come to see Mata Bwyki. He has asked Mata Bwyki to be his friend. Mata

Bwyki has taken him by the hand, and has become his blood-brother.

Tandelay belongs to Iboko now. He has become this day one of the

Bangala. O, Iboko! listen to the voice of Mata Bwyki.’ (I thought they

must have been incurably deaf, not to have heard that voice). ‘Bula

Matari and Mata Bwyki are one to-day. We have joined hands. Hurt not

Bula Matari’s people; steal not from them; offend them not. Bring food

and sell to him at a fair price, gently, kindly, and in peace; for he

is my brother. Hear you, ye people of Iboko--you by the river side, and

you of the interior?’

“‘We hear, Mata Bwyki!’ shouted the multitude.”[59] And the ceremony

was ended.

A little later than this, Stanley, or Tandelay, or Bula Matari, as the

natives called him, was at Bumba, and there again he exchanged blood

in friendship. “Myombi, the chief,” he says, “was easily persuaded

by Yumbila to make blood-brotherhood with me; and for the fiftieth

time my poor arm was scarified, and my blood shed for the cause of

civilization. Probably one thousand people of both sexes looked on the

scene, wonderingly and strangely. A young branch of a palm was cut,

twisted, and a knot tied at each end; the knots were dipped in wood

ashes, and then seized and held by each of us, while the medicine-man

practised his blood-letting art, and lanced us both, until Myombi

winced with pain; after which the knotted branch was severed; and,

in some incomprehensible manner, I had become united forever to my

fiftieth brother; to whom I was under the obligation of defending [him]

against all foes until death.”[60]

The blood of a fair proportion of all the first families of Equatorial

Africa now courses in Stanley’s veins; and if ever there was an

American citizen who could appropriate to himself preeminently the

national motto, “E pluribus unum,” Stanley is the man.

The root-idea of this rite of blood-friendship seems to include the

belief, that the blood is the life of a living being; not merely that

the blood is _essential_ to life, but that, in a peculiar sense, it

_is_ life; that it actually vivifies by its presence; and that by its

passing from one organism to another it carries and imparts life.

The inter-commingling of the blood of two organisms is, therefore,

according to this view, equivalent to the inter-commingling of the

lives, of the personalities, of the natures, thus brought together; so

that there is, thereby and thenceforward, one life in the two bodies,

a common life between the two friends: a thought which Aristotle

recognizes in his citation of the ancient “proverb”: “One soul [in two

bodies],”[61] a proverb which has not lost its currency in any of the

centuries.

That the blood can retain its vivifying power whether passing into

another by way of the lips or by way of the veins, is, on the face of

it, no less plausible, than that the administering of stimulants,

tonics, nutriments, nervines, or anæsthetics, hypodermically, may be

equally potent, in certain cases, with the more common and normal

method of seeking assimilation by the process of digestion. That

the blood of the living has a peculiar vivifying force, in its

transference from one organism to another, is one of the clearly proven

re-disclosures of modern medical science; and this transference of

blood has been made to advantage by way of the veins, of the stomach,

of the intestines, of the tissue, and even of the lungs--through

dry-spraying.[62]

The Blood Covenant: A Primitive Rite and its Bearings on Scripture · 第 21 / 80 题