INTRODUCTION.

DON MANOEL GONZALES is the assumed name of the writer of a “Voyage to

Great Britain, containing an Account of England and Scotland,” which was

first printed in the first of the two folio volumes of “A Collection of

Voyages and Travels, compiled from the Library of the Earl of Oxford”

(Robert Harley, who died in 1724, but whose industry in collection was

continued by his son Edward, the second Earl), “interspersed and

illustrated with Notes.” These volumes, known as the “Harleian

Collection,” were published in 1745 and 1746. The narrative was

reproduced early in the present century in the second of the seventeen

quartos of John Pinkerton’s “General Collection of the best and the most

interesting Voyages and Travels of the World” (1808–1814), from which

this account of London is taken. The writer does here, no doubt, keep up

his character of Portuguese by a light allusion to “our extensive city of

Lisbon,” but he forgets to show his nationality when speaking of Portugal

among the countries with which London has trade, and he writes of London

altogether like one to the City born, when he describes its inner life

together with its institutions and its buildings.

The book is one of those that have been attributed to Defoe, who died in

1731, and the London it describes was dated by Pinkerton in the last year

of Defoe’s life. This is also the latest date to be found in the

narrative. On page 93 of this volume, old buildings at St. Bartholomew’s

are said to have been pulled down in the year 1731, “and a magnificent

pile erected in the room of them, about 150 feet in length, faced with a

pure white stone, besides other additions now building.” That passage

was written, therefore, after 1731, and could not possibly have been

written by Defoe. But if the book was in Robert Harley’s collection, and

not one of the additions made by his son the second earl, the main body

of the account of London must be of a date earlier than the first earl’s

death in 1724. Note, for instance, the references on pages 27, 28, to

“the late Queen Mary,” and to “her Majesty” Queen Anne, as if Anne were

living. It would afterwards have been brought to date of publication by

additions made in or before 1745. The writer, whoever he may have been,

was an able man, who joined to the detail of a guide-book the clear

observation of one who writes like an educated and not untravelled London

merchant, giving a description of his native town as it was in the reign

of George the First, with addition of a later touch or two from the

beginning of the reign of George the Second.

His London is London of the time when Pope published his translation of

the “Iliad,” and was nettled at the report that Addison, at Button’s

Coffee House, had given to Tickell’s little venture in the same direction

the praise of having more in it of Homer’s fire. Button’s Coffee House

was of Addison’s foundation, for the benefit of Daniel Button, an old

steward of the Countess of Warwick’s, whom he had settled there in 1812.

It was in Russell Street, Covent Garden, and Addison brought the wits to

it by using it himself. “Don Manoel Gonzales” describes very clearly in

the latter part of this account of London, the manner of using taverns

and coffee-houses by the Londoners of his days, and other ways of life

with high and low. It is noticeable, however, that his glance does not

include the ways of men of letters. His four orders of society are, the

noblemen and gentlemen, whose wives breakfast at twelve; the merchants

and richer tradesmen; after whom he places the lawyers and doctors; whose

professional class is followed by that of the small tradesmen,

costermongers, and other people of the lower orders. This, and the

clearness of detail upon London commerce, may strengthen the general

impression that the description comes rather from a shrewd, clear-headed,

and successful merchant than from a man of letters.

The London described is that of Addison who died in 1719, of Steele who

died in 1729, of Pope who died in 1744. It is the London into which

Samuel Johnson came in 1738, at the age of twenty-nine—seven years before

the manuscript of “Manoel de Gonzales” appeared in print. “How different

a place,” said Johnson, “London is to different people; but the

intellectual man is struck with it as comprehending the whole of human

life in all its variety, the contemplation of which is inexhaustible.”

Its hard features were shown in the poem entitled _London_—an imitation

of the third satire of Juvenal—with which Johnson began his career in the

great city, pressed by poverty, but not to be subdued:—

“By numbers here from shame or censure free,

All crimes are safe but hated poverty.

This, only this, the rigid law pursues,

This, only this, provokes the snarling Muse.

The sober trader, at a tattered cloak,

Wakes from his dream and labours for a joke;

With brisker air the silken courtiers gaze,

And turn the varied taunt a thousand ways.

Of all the griefs that harass the distressed,

Sure the most bitter is a scornful jest;

Fate never wounds more deep the generous heart

Than when a blockhead’s insult points the dart.”

When Don Manoel’s account of London was written the fashionable world was

only beginning to migrate from Covent Garden—once a garden belonging to

the Convent of Westminster, and the first London square inhabited by

persons of rank and fashion—to Grosvenor Square, of which Don Manoel

describes the new glories. They included a gilt equestrian statue of

King George I. in the middle of its garden, to say nothing of kitchen

areas to its houses, then unusual enough to need special description: “To

the kitchens and offices, which have little paved yards with vaults

before them, they descend by twelve or fifteen steps, and these yards are

defended by a high palisade of iron.” Altogether, we are told, Grosvenor

Square “may well be looked upon as the beauty of the town, and those who

have not seen it cannot have an adequate idea of the place.”

But Covent Garden is named by “Don Manoel Gonzales,” with St. James’s

Park, as a gathering-place of the London world of fashion. The

neighbouring streets, it may be added, had many coffee-houses,

wine-cellars, fruit and jelly shops; fruit, flowers, and herbs were sold

in its central space; and one large woman thoughtfully considering the

fashion of the place, sat at her stall in a lace dress of which the

lowest estimate was that it must have cost a hundred guineas.

London in 1731 · 第 3 / 13 题