"Not merely the manner of presentment, the substance, and also the

style and versification have undergone a change. I might point to the

profound intellectual depth of certain pieces as its characteristic,

or, equally, to the traces here and there of an apparent carelessness

of workmanship; or, yet again, to the new and very marked partiality

for scenes and situations of English and modern rather than mediæval

and foreign life."

Noble as much of Mr. Browning's later work is, full of intellect, alive

with excellent passages (in the first volume of the Dramatic Idyls [50]

perhaps more powerful than in any earlier work); notwithstanding all

that, we think the change here indicated matter of regret. After all,

we have to conjure up ideal poets for ourselves out of those who stand

in or behind the range of volumes on our book-shelves; and our ideal

Browning would have for his entire structural type those two volumes of

Men and Women with Pippa Passes.

Certainly, it is a delightful world to which Mr. Browning has given us

the key, and those volumes a delightful gift to our age-record of so

much that is richest in the world of things, and men, and their

works--all so much the richer by the great intellect, the great

imagination, which has made the record, transmuted them into

imperishable things of art:--

"'With souls should souls have place'--this, with Mr. Browning, is

something more than a mere poetical conceit. It is the condensed

expression of an experience, a philosophy, and an art. Like the lovers

of his lyric, Mr. Browning has renounced the selfish serenities of

wild-wood and dream-palace; he has fared up and down among men,

listening to the music of humanity, [51] observing the acts of men, and

he has sung what he has heard, and he has painted what he has seen.

Will the work live? we ask; and we can answer only in his own words--

It lives,

If precious be the soul of man to man."

9th November 1887

IV. "ROBERT ELSMERE"

[55] THOSE who, in this bustling age, turn to fiction not merely for a

little passing amusement, but for profit, for the higher sort of

pleasure, will do well, we think (after a conscientious perusal on our

own part) to bestow careful reading on Robert Elsmere. A chef d'oeuvre

of that kind of quiet evolution of character through circumstance,

introduced into English literature by Miss Austen, and carried to

perfection in France by George Sand (who is more to the point, because,

like Mrs. Ward, she was not afraid to challenge novel-readers to an

interest in religious questions), it abounds in sympathy with people as

we find them, in aspiration towards something better--towards a certain

ideal--in a refreshing sense of second thoughts everywhere. The author

clearly has developed a remarkable natural aptitude for literature by

liberal reading and most patient care [56] in composition--composition

in that narrower sense which is concerned with the building of a good

sentence; as also in that wider sense, which ensures, in a work like

this, with so many joints, so many currents of interest, a final unity

of impression an the part of the reader, and easy transition by him

from one to the other. Well-used to works of fiction which tell all

they have to tell in one thin volume, we have read Mrs. Ward's three

volumes with unflagging readiness.

For, in truth, that quiet method of evolution, which she pursues

undismayed to the end, requires a certain lengthiness; and the reader's

reward will be in a secure sense that he has been in intercourse with

no mere flighty remnants, but with typical forms, of character, firmly

and fully conceived. We are persuaded that the author might have

written a novel which should have been all shrewd impressions of

society, or all humorous impressions of country life, or all quiet fun

and genial caricature. Actually she has chosen to combine something of

each of these with a very sincerely felt religious interest; and who

will deny that to trace the influence of religion upon human character

is one of the [57] legitimate functions of the novel? In truth, the

modern "novel of character" needs some such interest, to lift it

sufficiently above the humdrum of life; as men's horizons are enlarged

by religion, of whatever type it may be--and we may say at once that

the religious type which is dear to Mrs. Ward, though avowedly "broad,"

is not really the broadest. Having conceived her work thus, she has

brought a rare instinct for probability and nature to the difficult

task of combining this religious motive and all the learned thought it

involves, with a very genuine interest in many varieties of average

mundane life.

We should say that the author's special ethical gift lay in a

delicately intuitive sympathy, not, perhaps, with all phases of

character, but certainly with the very varied class of persons

represented in these volumes. It may be congruous with this, perhaps,

that her success should be more assured in dealing with the characters

of women than with those of men. The men who pass before us in her

pages, though real and tangible and effective enough, seem,

nevertheless, from time to time to reveal their joinings. They are

composite of many different men we seem to have [58] known, and fancy

we could detach again from the ensemble and from each other. And their

goodness, when they are good, is--well! a little conventional; the kind

of goodness that men themselves discount rather largely in their

estimates of each other. Robert himself is certainly worth knowing--a

really attractive union of manliness and saintliness, of shrewd sense

and unworldly aims, and withal with that kindness and pity the absence

of which so often abates the actual value of those other gifts. Mrs.

Ward's literary power is sometimes seen at its best (it is a proof of

her high cultivation of this power that so it should be) in the

analysis of minor characters, both male and female. Richard Leyburn,

deceased before the story begins, but warm in the memory of the few who

had known him, above all of his great-souled daughter Catherine,

strikes us, with his religious mysticism, as being in this way one of

the best things in the book:--

"Poor Richard Leyburn! Yet where had the defeat lain?

"'Was he happy in his school life?' Robert asked gently. 'Was teaching

what he liked?'

[59] "'Oh! yes, only--' and then added hurriedly, as though drawn on in

spite of herself by the grave sympathy of his look, 'I never knew

anybody so good who thought himself of so little account. He always

believed that he had missed everything, wasted everything, and that

anybody else would have made infinitely more out of his life. He vas

always blaming, scourging himself. And all the time he was the

noblest, purest, most devoted--'

"She stopped. Her voice had passed beyond her control. Elsmere was

startled by the feeling she showed. Evidently he had touched one of

the few sore places in this pure heart. It was as though her memory of

her father had in it elements of almost intolerable pathos, as though

the child's brooding love and loyalty were in perpetual protest even

now after this lapse of years against the verdict which an

over-scrupulous, despondent soul had pronounced upon itself. Did she

feel that he had gone uncomforted out of life--even by her--even by

religion? Was that the sting?"

A little later she gives the record of his last hours:--

[60] "'Catherine! Life is harder, the narrower way narrower than ever.

I die--and memory caught still the piteous long-drawn breath by which

the voice was broken--'in much--much perplexity about many things. You

have a clear soul, an iron will. Strengthen the others. Bring them

safe to the day of account.'"

And then the smaller--some of them, ethically, very small--women; Lady

Wynnstay, Mrs. Fleming, Mrs. Thornburgh; above all, Robert's delightful

Irish mother, and Mrs. Darcy; how excellent they are! Mrs. Darcy we

seem to have known, yet cannot have enough of, rejoiced to catch sight

of her capital letter on the page, as we read on. In truth, if a high

and ideal purpose, really learned in the school of Wordsworth and among

the Westmorland hills which Mrs. Ward describes so sympathetically,

with fitting dignity and truth of style, has accompanied the author

throughout; no less plain, perhaps more pleasing to some readers, is

the quiet humour which never fails her, and tests, while it relieves,

the sincerity of her more serious thinking:--

"At last Mrs. Darcy fluttered off, only, however, to come hurrying back

with little, short, [61] scudding steps, to implore them all to come to

tea with her as soon as possible in the garden that was her special

hobby, and in her last new summer-house.

"'I build two or three every summer,' she said; 'now there are

twenty-one! Roger laughs at me,' and there was a momentary bitterness

in the little eerie face; 'but how can one live without hobbies?

That's one--then I've two more. My album--oh, you will all write in my

album, won't you? When I was young--when I was Maid of Honour'--and

she drew herself up slightly--'everybody had albums. Even the dear

Queen herself! I remember how she made M. Guizot write in it;

something quite stupid, after all. Those hobbies--the garden and the

album--are quite harmless, aren't they? They hurt nobody, do they?'

Her voice dropped a little, with a pathetic expostulating intonation in

it, as of one accustomed to be rebuked."

Mrs. Ward's women, as we have said, are more organic, sympathetic, and

really creative, than her men, and make their vitality evident by

becoming, quite naturally, the centres of very [62] life-like and

dramatic groups of people, family or social; while her men are the very

genii of isolation and division. It is depressing to see so really

noble a character as Catherine soured, as we feel, and lowered, as time

goes on, from the happy resignation of the first volume (in which

solemn, beautiful, and entire, and so very real, she is like a poem of

Wordsworth) down to the mere passivity of the third volume, and the

closing scene of Robert Elsmere's days, very exquisitely as this

episode of unbelieving yet saintly biography has been conceived and

executed. Catherine certainly, for one, has no profit in the

development of Robert's improved gospel. The "stray sheep," we think,

has by no means always the best of the argument, and her story is

really a sadder, more testing one than his. Though both alike, we

admit it cordially, have a genuine sense of the eternal moral charm of

"renunciation," something even of the thirst for martyrdom, for those

wonderful, inaccessible, cold heights of the Imitation, eternal also in

their aesthetic charm.

These characters and situations, pleasant or profoundly interesting,

which it is good to have [63] come across, are worked out, not in rapid

sketches, nor by hazardous epigram, but more securely by patient

analysis; and though we have said that Mrs. Ward is most successful in

female portraiture, her own mind and culture have an unmistakable

virility and grasp and scientific firmness. This indispensable

intellectual process, which will be relished by admirers of George

Eliot, is relieved constantly by the sense of a charming landscape

background, for the most part English. Mrs. Ward has been a true

disciple in the school of Wordsworth, and really undergone its

influence. Her Westmorland scenery is more than a mere background; its

spiritual and, as it were, personal hold on persons, as understood by

the great poet of the Lakes, is seen actually at work, in the

formation, in the refining, of character. It has been a stormy day:--

"Before him the great hollow of High Fell was just coming out from the

white mists surging round it. A shaft of sunlight lay across its upper

end, and he caught a marvellous apparition of a sunlit valley hung in

air, a pale strip of blue above it, a white thread of stream wavering

[64] through it, and all around it and below it the rolling

rain-clouds."

There is surely something of "natural magic" in that! The wilder

capacity of the mountains is brought out especially in a weird story of

a haunted girl, an episode well illustrating the writer's more

imaginative psychological power; for, in spite of its quiet general

tenour, the book has its adroitly managed elements of

sensation--witness the ghost, in which the average human susceptibility

to supernatural terrors takes revenge on the sceptical Mr. Wendover,

and the love-scene with Madame de Netteville, which, like those other

exciting passages, really furthers the development of the proper

ethical interests of the book. The Oxford episodes strike us as being

not the author's strongest work, as being comparatively conventional,

coming, as they do, in a book whose predominant note is reality. Yet

her sympathetic command over, her power of evoking, the genius of

places, is clearly shown in the touches by which she brings out the so

well-known grey and green of college and garden--touches which bring

the real Oxford to the mind's eye better than any elaborate description

[65] --for the beauty of the place itself resides also in delicate

touches. The book passes indeed, successively, through distinct,

broadly conceived phases of scenery, which, becoming veritable parts of

its texture, take hold on the reader, as if in an actual sojourn in the

places described. Surrey--its genuine though almost suburban wildness,

with the vicarage and the wonderful abode, above all, the ancient

library of Mr. Wendover, all is admirably done, the landscape naturally

counting for a good deal in the development of the profoundly

meditative, country-loving souls of Mrs. Ward's favourite characters.

Well! Mrs. Ward has chosen to use all these varied gifts and

accomplishments for a certain purpose. Briefly, Robert Elsmere, a

priest of the Anglican Church, marries a very religious woman; there is

the perfection of "mutual love"; at length he has doubts about

"historic Christianity"; he gives up his orders; carries his learning,

his fine intellect, his goodness, nay, his saintliness, into a kind of

Unitarianism; the wife becomes more intolerant than ever; there is a

long and faithful effort on both sides, eventually successful, on the

part of these mentally [66] divided people, to hold together; ending

with the hero's death, the genuine piety and resignation of which is

the crowning touch in the author's able, learned, and thoroughly

sincere apology for Robert Elsmere's position.

For good or evil, the sort of doubts which troubled Robert Elsmere are

no novelty in literature, and we think the main issue of the "religious

question" is not precisely where Mrs. Ward supposes--that it has

advanced, in more senses than one, beyond the point raised by Renan's

Vie de Jésus. Of course, a man such as Robert Elsmere came to be ought

not to be a clergyman of the Anglican Church. The priest is still, and

will, we think, remain, one of the necessary types of humanity; and he

is untrue to his type, unless, with whatever inevitable doubts in this

doubting age, he feels, on the whole, the preponderance in it of those

influences which make for faith. It is his triumph to achieve as much

faith as possible in an age of negation. Doubtless, it is part of the

ideal of the Anglican Church that, under certain safeguards, it should

find room for latitudinarians even among its clergy. Still, with

these, as [67] with all other genuine priests, it is the positive not

the negative result that justifies the position. We have little

patience with those liberal clergy who dwell on nothing else than the

difficulties of faith and the propriety of concession to the opposite

force. Yes! Robert Elsmere was certainly right in ceasing to be a

clergyman. But it strikes us as a blot on his philosophical

pretensions that he should have been both so late in perceiving the

difficulty, and then so sudden and trenchant in dealing with so great

and complex a question. Had he possessed a perfectly philosophic or

scientific temper he would have hesitated. This is not the place to

discuss in detail the theological position very ably and seriously

argued by Mrs. Ward. All we can say is that, one by one, Elsmere's

objections may be met by considerations of the same genus, and not less

equal weight, relatively to a world so obscure, in its origin and

issues, as that in which we live.

Robert Elsmere was a type of a large class of minds which cannot be

sure that the sacred story is true. It is philosophical, doubtless,

and a duty to the intellect to recognize our doubts, [68] to locate

them, perhaps to give them practical effect. It may be also a moral

duty to do this. But then there is also a large class of minds which

cannot be sure it is false--minds of very various degrees of

conscientiousness and intellectual power, up to the highest. They will

think those who are quite sure it is false unphilosophical through lack

of doubt. For their part, they make allowance in their scheme of life

for a great possibility, and with some of them that bare concession of

possibility (the subject of it being what it is) becomes the most

important fact in the world.

The recognition of it straightway opens wide the door to hope and love;

and such persons are, as we fancy they always will be, the nucleus of a

Church. Their particular phase of doubt, of philosophic uncertainty,

has been the secret of millions of good Christians, multitudes of

worthy priests. They knit themselves to believers, in various degrees,

of all ages. As against the purely negative action of the scientific

spirit, the high-pitched Grey, the theistic Elsmere, the "ritualistic

priest," the quaint Methodist Fleming, both so admirably sketched,

present [69] perhaps no unconquerable differences. The question of the

day is not between one and another of these, but in another sort of

opposition, well defined by Mrs. Ward herself, between--

"Two estimates of life--the estimate which is the offspring of the

scientific spirit, and which is for ever making the visible world

fairer and more desirable in mortal eyes; and the estimate of Saint

Augustine."

To us, the belief in God, in goodness at all, in the story of

Bethlehem, does not rest on evidence so diverse in character and force

as Mrs. Ward supposes. At his death Elsmere has started what to us

would be a most unattractive place of worship, where he preaches an

admirable sermon on the purely human aspect of the life of Christ. But

we think there would be very few such sermons in the new church or

chapel, for the interest of that life could hardly be very varied, when

all such sayings as that "though He was rich, for our sakes He became

poor" have ceased to be applicable to it. It is the infinite nature of

Christ which has led to such diversities of genius in preaching as St.

Francis, and Taylor, and Wesley.

[70] And after all we fear we have been unjust to Mrs. Ward's work. If

so, we should read once more, and advise our readers to read, the

profoundly thought and delicately felt chapter--chapter forty-three in

her third volume--in which she describes the final spiritual reunion,

on a basis of honestly diverse opinion, of the husband and wife. Her

view, we think, could hardly have been presented more attractively.

For ourselves we can only thank her for pleasure and profit in the

reading of her book, which has refreshed actually the first and deepest

springs of feeling, while it has charmed the literary sense.

28th March 1888

V. THEIR MAJESTIES' SERVANTS

Annals of the English Stage, from Thomas Betterton to Edmund Kean. By

Dr. Doran, F.S.A. Edited and revised by Robert W. Lowe. John C. Nimmo.

[73] THOSE who care for the history of the drama as a branch of

literature, or for the history of that general development of human

manners of which the stage has been always an element and a very lively

measure or index, will be grateful to Mr. Lowe for this revised and

charmingly illustrated edition of Dr. Doran's pleasant old book. Three

hundred years and more of a singularly varied and vivacious sort of

history!--it was a bold thing to undertake; and Dr. Doran did his work

well--did it with adequate "love." These Annals of the English Stage,

from Thomas Betterton to Edmund [74] Kean, are full of the colours of

life in their most emphatic and motley contrasts, as is natural in

proportion as the stage itself concentrates and artificially

intensifies the character and conditions of ordinary life. The long

story of "Their Majesties' Servants," treated thus, becomes from age to

age an agreeable addition to those personal memoirs--Evelyn's, and the

like--which bring the influence and charm of a visible countenance to

the dry tenour of ordinary history, and the critic's work upon it

naturally becomes, in the first place, a mere gathering of some of the

flowers which lie so abundantly scattered here and there.

A history of the English stage must necessarily be in part a history of

one of the most delightful of subjects--old London, of which from time

to time we catch extraordinary glimpses in Dr. Doran's pages. From 1682

to 1695, as if the Restoration had not come, there was but one theatre

in London. In Charles I.'s time Shoreditch was the dramatic quarter of

London par excellence.--

"The popular taste was not only there directed towards the stage, but

it was a district [75] wherein many actors dwelt, and consequently

died. The baptismal register of St. Leonard's, Shoreditch, contains

Christian names which appear to have been chosen with reference to the

heroines of Shakespeare; and the record of burials bears the name of

many an old actor of mark whose remains now lie within the churchyard."

Earlier and later, the Surrey side of the Thames was the favourite

locality for play-houses. The Globe was there, and the Bear-garden,

represented in Mr. Lowe's luxurious new edition by delightful woodcuts.

For this new edition adds to the original merits of the work the very

substantial charm of abundant illustrations, first-rate in subject and

execution, and of three kinds--copper-plate likenesses of actors and

other personages connected with theatrical history; a series of

delicate, picturesque, highly detailed woodcuts of theatrical

topography, chiefly the little old theatres; and, by way of tail-pieces

to the chapters, a second series of woodcuts of a vigour and reality of

information, within very limited compass, which make one think of

Callot and the German [76] "little masters," depicting Garrick and

other famous actors in their favourite scenes.

In the vignettes of the Bear-garden and the Swan Theatre, for instance,

the artist has managed to throw over his minute plate a wonderful air

of pleasantness, a light which, though very delicate, is very

theatrical. The river and its tiny craft, the little gabled houses of

the neighbourhood, with a garden or two dropped in, tell delightfully

in the general effect. They are worthy to rank with Cruikshank's

illustrations of Jack Sheppard and The Tower of London, as mementoes of

the little old smokeless London before the century of Johnson, though

that, too, as Dr. Doran bears witness, knew what fogs could be. Then

there is the Fortune Theatre near Cripplegate, and, most charming of

all, two views--street and river fronts--the Duke's Theatre, Dorset

Garden, in Fleet Street, designed by Wren, decorated by

Gibbons--graceful, naïve, dainty, like the work of a very refined

Palladio, working minutely, perhaps more delicately than at Vicenza, in

the already crowded city on the Thames side.

Essays from 'The Guardian' · 第 2 / 5 段