The Greek and Roman stories hardly come up to the standards

E-text prepared by Suzanne Lybarger, Janet Blenkinship, Brian Janes, and

the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team

(https://www.pgdp.net/)

GREEK AND ROMAN GHOST STORIES

by

LACY COLLISON-MORLEY

Formerly Scholar of St. John's College, Oxford

Author of "Giuseppe Baretti and His Friends," "Modern Italian

Literature"

Oxford

B. H. Blackwell, Broad Street

London

Simpkin, Marshall & Co., Limited

MCMXII

This collection was originally begun at the suggestion of Mr. Marion

Crawford, whose wide and continual reading of the classics supplied more

than one of the stories. They were put together during a number of years

of casual browsing among the classics, and will perhaps interest others

who indulge in similar amusements.

CONTENTS

PAGE

I. THE POWER OF THE DEAD TO RETURN TO EARTH 1

II. THE BELIEF IN GHOSTS IN GREECE AND ROME 13

III. STORIES OF HAUNTING 19

IV. NECROMANCY 33

V. VISIONS OF THE DEAD IN SLEEP 45

VI. APPARITIONS OF THE DEAD 54

VII. WARNING APPARITIONS 72

I

THE POWER OF THE DEAD TO RETURN TO EARTH

Though there is no period at which the ancients do not seem to have

believed in a future life, continual confusion prevails when they come

to picture the existence led by man in the other world, as we see from

the sixth book of the _Æneid_. Combined with the elaborate mythology of

Greece, we are confronted with the primitive belief of Italy, and

doubtless of Greece too--a belief supported by all the religious rites

in connection with the dead--that the spirits of the departed lived on

in the tomb with the body. As cremation gradually superseded burial, the

idea took shape that the soul might have an existence of its own,

altogether independent of the body, and a place of abode was assigned to

it in a hole in the centre of the earth, where it lived on in eternity

with other souls.

This latter view seems to have become the official theory, at least in

Italy, in classical days. In the gloomy, horrible Etruscan religion, the

shades were supposed to be in charge of the Conductor of the Dead--a

repulsive figure, always represented with wings and long, matted hair

and a hammer, whose appearance was afterwards imitated in the dress of

the man who removed the dead from the arena. Surely something may be

said for Gaston Boissier's suggestion that Dante's Tuscan blood may

account to some extent for the gruesome imagery of the _Inferno_.

Cicero[1] tells us that it was generally believed that the dead lived on

beneath the earth, and special provision was made for them in every

Latin town in the "mundus," a deep trench which was dug before the

"pomerium" was traced, and regarded as the particular entrance to the

lower world for the dead of the town in question. The trench was vaulted

over, so that it might correspond more or less with the sky, a gap being

left in the vault which was closed with the stone of the departed--the

"lapis manalis." Corn was thrown into the trench, which was filled up

with earth, and an altar erected over it. On three solemn days in the

year--August 25, October 5, and November 8--the trench was opened and

the stone removed, the dead thus once more having free access to the

world above, where the usual offerings were made to them.[2]

These provisions clearly show an official belief that death did not

create an impassable barrier between the dead and the living. The

spirits of the departed still belonged to the city of their birth, and

took an interest in their old home. They could even return to it on the

days when "the trench of the gods of gloom lies open and the very jaws

of hell yawn wide."[3] Their rights must be respected, if evil was to be

averted from the State. In fact, the dead were gods with altars of their

own,[4] and Cornelia, the mother of the Gracchi, could write to her

sons, "You will make offerings to me and invoke your parent as a

god."[5] Their cult was closely connected with that of the Lares--the

gods of the hearth, which symbolized a fixed abode in contrast with the

early nomad life. Indeed, there is practically no distinction between

the Lares and the Manes, the souls of the good dead. But the dead had

their own festival, the "Dies Parentales," held from the 13th to the

21st of February, in Rome;[6] and in Greece the "Genesia," celebrated on

the 5th of Boedromion, towards the end of September, about which we

know very little.[7]

There is nothing more characteristic of paganism than the passionate

longing of the average man to perpetuate his memory after death in the

world round which all his hopes and aspirations clung. Cicero uses it as

an argument for immortality.[8]

Many men left large sums to found colleges to celebrate their memories

and feast at their tombs on stated occasions.[9] Lucian laughs at this

custom when he represents the soul of the ordinary man in the next world

as a mere bodiless shade that vanishes at a touch like smoke. It

subsists on the libations and offerings it receives from the living, and

those who have no friends or relatives on earth are starving and

famished.[10] Violators of tombs were threatened with the curse of dying

the last of their race--a curse which Macaulay, with his intense family

affection, considered the most awful that could be devised by man; and

the fact that the tombs were built by the high road, so that the dead

might be cheered by the greeting of the passer-by, lends an additional

touch of sadness to a walk among the crumbling ruins that line the Latin

or the Appian Way outside Rome to-day.

No one of the moderns has caught the pagan feeling towards death better

than Giosuè Carducci, a true spiritual descendant of the great Romans of

old, if ever there was one. He tells how, one glorious June day, he was

sitting in school, listening to the priest outraging the verb "amo,"

when his eyes wandered to the window and lighted on a cherry-tree, red

with fruit, and then strayed away to the hills and the sky and the

distant curve of the sea-shore. All Nature was teeming with life, and he

felt an answering thrill, when suddenly, as if from the very fountains

of being within him, there welled up a consciousness of death, and with

it the formless nothing, and a vision of himself lying cold, motionless,

dumb in the black earth, while above him the birds sang, the trees

rustled in the wind, the rivers ran on in their course, and the living

revelled in the warm sun, bathed in its divine light. This first vision

of death often haunted him in later years;[11] and one realizes that

such must often have been the feelings of the Romans, and still more

often of the Greeks, for the joy of the Greek in life was far greater

than that of the Roman. Peace was the only boon that death could bring

to a pagan, and "Pax tecum æterna" is among the commonest of the

inscriptions. The life beyond the grave was at best an unreal and

joyless copy of an earthly existence, and Achilles told Odysseus that he

would rather be the serf of a poor man upon earth than Achilles among

the shades.

When we come to inquire into the appearance of ghosts revisiting the

glimpses of the moon, we find, as we should expect, that they are a

vague, unsubstantial copy of their former selves on earth. In Homer[12]

the shade of Patroclus, which visited Achilles in a vision as he slept

by the sea-shore, looks exactly as Patroclus had looked on earth, even

down to the clothes. Hadrian's famous "animula vagula blandula" gives

the same idea, and it would be difficult to imagine a disembodied spirit

which retains its personality and returns to earth again except as a

kind of immaterial likeness of its earthly self. We often hear of the

extreme pallor of ghosts, which was doubtless due to their being

bloodless and to the pallor of death itself. Propertius conceived of

them as skeletons;[13] but the unsubstantial, shadowy aspect is by far

the commonest, and best harmonizes with the life they were supposed to

lead.

Hitherto we have been dealing with the spirits of the dead who have been

duly buried and are at rest, making their appearance among men only at

stated intervals, regulated by the religion of the State. The lot of the

dead who have not been vouchsafed the trifling boon of a handful of

earth cast upon their bones was very different. They had not yet been

admitted to the world below, and were forced to wander for a hundred

years before they might enter Charon's boat. Æneas beheld them on the

banks of the Styx, stretching out their hands "ripæ ulterioris amore."

The shade of Patroclus describes its hapless state to Achilles, as does

that of Elpenor to Odysseus, when they meet in the lower world. It is

not surprising that the ancients attached the highest importance to the

duty of burying the dead, and that Pausanias blames Lysander for not

burying the bodies of Philocles and the four thousand slain at

Ægospotami, seeing that the Athenians even buried the Persian dead after

Marathon.[14]

The spirits of the unburied were usually held to be bound, more or less,

to the spot where their bodies lay, and to be able to enter into

communication with the living with comparative ease, even if they did

not actually haunt them. They were, in fact, evil spirits which had to

be propitiated and honoured in special rites. Their appearances among

the living were not regulated by religion. They wandered at will over

the earth, belonging neither to this world nor to the next, restless and

malignant, unable to escape from the trammels of mortal life, in the

joys of which they had no part. Thus, in the _Phædo_[15] we read of

souls "prowling about tombs and sepulchres, near which, as they tell us,

are seen certain ghostly apparitions of souls which have not departed

pure ... These must be the souls, not of the good, but of the evil,

which are compelled to wander about such places in payment of the

penalty of their former evil way of life."

Apuleius[16] classifies the spirits of the departed for us. The Manes

are the good people, not to be feared so long as their rites are duly

performed, as we have already seen; Lemures are disembodied spirits;

while Larvæ are the ghosts that haunt houses. Apuleius, however, is

wholly uncritical, and the distinction between Larvæ and Lemures is

certainly not borne out by facts.

The Larvæ had distinct attributes, and were thought to cause epilepsy or

madness. They were generally treated more or less as a joke,[17] and are

spoken of much as we speak of a bogey. They appear to have been

entrusted with the torturing of the dead, as we see from the saying,

"Only the Larvæ war with the dead."[18] In Seneca's _Apocolocyntosis_,[19]

when the question of the deification of the late Emperor Claudius

is laid before a meeting of the gods, Father Janus gives it as his

opinion that no more mortals should be treated in this way, and that

"anyone who, contrary to this decree, shall hereafter be made,

addressed, or painted as a god, should be delivered over to the

Larvæ" and flogged at the next games.

Larva also means a skeleton, and Trimalchio, following the Egyptian

custom, has one brought in and placed on the table during his famous

feast. It is, as one would expect, of silver, and the millionaire

freedman points the usual moral--"Let us eat, drink, and be merry, for

to-morrow we die."[20]

The Larvæ were regular characters in the Atellane farces at Rome, where

they performed various "danses macabres." Can these possibly be the

prototypes of the Dances of Death so popular in the Middle Ages? We find

something very similar on the well-known silver cups discovered at Bosco

Reale, though Death itself does not seem to have been represented in

this way. Some of the designs in the medieval series would certainly

have appealed to the average bourgeois Roman of the Trimalchio

type--e.g., "Les Trois Vifs et les Trois Morts," the three men riding

gaily out hunting and meeting their own skeletons. Such crude contrasts

are just what one would expect to find at Pompeii.

Lemures and Larvæ are often confused, but Lemures is the regular word

for the dead not at rest--the "Lemuri," or spirits of the churchyard, of

some parts of modern Italy. They were evil spirits, propitiated in early

days with blood. Hence the first gladiatorial games were given in

connection with funerals. Both in Greece and in Rome there were special

festivals for appeasing these restless spirits. Originally they were of

a public character, for murder was common in primitive times, and such

spirits would be numerous, as is proved by the festival lasting three

days.

In Athens the Nemesia were held during Anthesterion (February-March). As

in Rome, the days were unlucky. Temples were closed and business was

suspended, for the dead were abroad. In the morning the doors were

smeared with pitch, and those in the house chewed whitethorn to keep off

the evil spirits. On the last day of the festival offerings were made

to Hermes, and the dead were formally bidden to depart.[21]

Ovid describes the Lemuria or Lemuralia.[22] They took place in May,

which was consequently regarded as an unlucky month for marriages, and

is still so regarded almost as universally in England to-day as it was

in Rome during the principate of Augustus. The name of the festival Ovid

derives from Remus, as the ghost of his murdered brother was said to

have appeared to Romulus in his sleep and to have demanded burial. Hence

the institution of the Lemuria.

The head of the family walked through the house with bare feet at dead

of night, making the mystic sign with his first and fourth fingers

extended, the other fingers being turned inwards and the thumb crossed

over them, in case he might run against an unsubstantial spirit as he

moved noiselessly along. This is the sign of "le corna," held to be

infallible against the Evil Eye in modern Italy. After solemnly washing

his hands, he places black beans in his mouth, and throws others over

his shoulders, saying, "With these beans do I redeem me and mine." He

repeats this ceremony nine times without looking round, and the spirits

are thought to follow unseen and pick up the beans. Then he purifies

himself once more and clashes brass, and bids the demons

leave his house. When he has repeated nine times "Manes exite paterni,"

he looks round, and the ceremony is over, and the restless ghosts have

been duly laid for a year.

Lamiæ haunted rooms, which had to be fumigated with sulphur, while some

mystic rites were performed with eggs before they could be expelled.

The dead not yet at rest were divided into three classes--those who had

died before their time, the [Greek: aôroi], who had to wander till the

span of their natural life was completed;[23] those who had met with

violent deaths, the [Greek: biaiothanatoi]; and the unburied, the

[Greek: ataphoi]. In the Hymn to Hecate, to whom they were especially

attached, they are represented as following in her train and taking part

in her nightly revels in human shape. The lot of the murdered is no

better, and executed criminals belong to the same class.

Spirits of this kind were supposed to haunt the place where their bodies

lay. Hence they were regarded as demons, and were frequently entrusted

with the carrying out of the strange curses, which have been found in

their tombs, or in wells where a man had been drowned, or even in the

sea, written on leaden tablets, often from right to left, or in queer

characters, so as to be illegible, with another tablet fastened over

them by means of a nail, symbolizing the binding effect it was hoped

they would have--the "Defixiones," to give them their Latin name, which

are very numerous among the inscriptions. So real was the belief in

these curses that the elder Pliny says that everyone is afraid of being

placed under evil spells;[24] and they are frequently referred to in

antiquity.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 1: _Tusc. Disp._, i. 16.]

[Footnote 2: Ov., _Fast._, iv. 821; Fowler, _Roman Festivals_, p. 211.]

[Footnote 3: Macrob., _Sat._, i. 16.]

[Footnote 4: Cic., _De Leg._, ii. 22.]

[Footnote 5: "Deum parentem" (Corn. Nep., _Fragm._, 12).]

[Footnote 6: Cp. Fowler, _Rom._ _Fest._]

[Footnote 7: Rohde, _Psyche_, p. 216. Cp. Herod., iv. 26.]

[Footnote 8: _Tusc._ _Disp._, i. 12, 27.]

[Footnote 9: Dill, _Roman Society from Nero to Marcus Aurelius_, p. 259

_ff._]

[Footnote 10: _De Luctu_, 9.]

[Footnote 11: Carducci, "Rimembranze di Scuola," in _Rime Nuove_.]

[Footnote 12: _Il._, 23. 64.]

[Footnote 13: "Turpia ossa," 4. 5. 4.]

[Footnote 14: Paus., 9. 32.]

[Footnote 15: 81 D.]

[Footnote 16: _De Genio Socratis_, 15.]

[Footnote 17: Cp. Plautus, _Cas._, iii. 4. 2; _Amphitr._, ii. 2. 145;

_Rudens_, v. 3. 67, etc.; and the use of the word "larvatus."]

[Footnote 18: Pliny, _N.H._, 1, Proef. 31: "Cum mortuis non nisi

Larvas luctari."]

[Footnote 19: Seneca, _Apocol._, 9. At the risk of irrelevance, I cannot

refrain from pointing out the enduring nature of proverbs as exemplified

in this section. Hercules grows more and more anxious at the turn the

debate is taking, and hastens from one god to another, saying: "Don't

grudge me this favour; the case concerns me closely. I shan't forget you

when the time comes. One good turn deserves another" (Manus manum

lavat). This is exactly the Neapolitan proverb, "One hand washes the

other, and both together wash the face." "Una mano lava l'altra e tutt'e

due si lavano la faccia," is more or less the modern version. In chapter

vii. we have also "gallum in suo sterquilino plurimum posse," which

corresponds to our own, "Every cock crows best on its own dunghill."]

[Footnote 20: Petr., _Sat._, 34.]

[Footnote 21: [Greek: thhyraze, kêres, oukhet Anthestêria.] Cp. Rohde,

_Psyche_, 217.]

[Footnote 22: _Fast._, v. 419 _ff._]

[Footnote 23: Tertull., _De An._, 56.]

[Footnote 24: _N.H._, 28. 2. 19.]

II

THE BELIEF IN GHOSTS IN GREECE AND ROME

Ghost stories play a very subordinate part in classical literature, as

is only to be expected. The religion of the hard-headed, practical Roman

was essentially formal, and consisted largely in the exact performance

of an elaborate ritual. His relations with the dead were regulated with

a care that might satisfy the most litigious of ghosts, and once a man

had carried out his part of the bargain, he did not trouble his head

further about his deceased ancestors, so long as he felt that they, in

their turn, were not neglecting his interests. Yet the average man in

Rome was glad to free himself from burdensome and expensive duties

towards the dead that had come down to him from past generations, and

the ingenuity of the lawyers soon devised a system of sham sales by

which this could be successfully and honourably accomplished.[25]

Greek religion, it is true, found expression to a large extent in

mythology; but the sanity of the Greek genius in its best days kept it

free from excessive superstition. Not till the invasion of the

West by the cults of the East do we find ghosts and spirits at all

common in literature.

The belief in apparitions existed, however, at all times, even among

educated people. The younger Pliny, for instance, writes to ask his

friend Sura for his opinion as to whether ghosts have a real existence,

with a form of their own, and are of divine origin, or whether they are

merely empty air, owing their definite shape to our superstitious fears.

We must not forget that Suetonius, whose superstition has become

proverbial, was a friend of Pliny, and wrote to him on one occasion,

begging him to procure the postponement of a case in which he was

engaged, as he had been frightened by a dream. Though Pliny certainly

did not possess his friend's amazing credulity, he takes the request

with becoming seriousness, and promises to do his best; but he adds that

the real question is whether Suetonius's dreams are usually true or not.

He then relates how he himself once had a vision of his mother-in-law,

of all people, appearing to him and begging him to abandon a case he had

undertaken. In spite of this awful warning he persevered, however, and

it was well that he did so, for the case proved the beginning of his

successful career at the Bar.[26] His uncle, the elder Pliny, seems to

have placed more faith in his dreams, and wrote his account of the

German wars entirely because he dreamt that Drusus appeared to him and

implored him to preserve his name from oblivion.[27]

The Plinies were undoubtedly two of the ablest and most enlightened men

of their time; and the belief in the value of dreams is certainly not

extinct among us yet. If we possess Artemidorus's book on the subject

for the ancient world, we have also the "Smorfia" of to-day, so dear to

the heart of the lotto-playing Neapolitan, which assigns a special

number to every conceivable subject that can possibly occur in a

dream--not excluding "u murtu che parl'" (the dead man that speaks)--for

the guidance of the believing gambler in selecting the numbers he is to

play for the week.

Plutarch placed great faith in ghosts and visions. In his Life of

Dion[28] he notes the singular fact that both Dion and Brutus were

warned of their approaching deaths by a frightful spectre. "It has been

maintained," he adds, "that no man in his senses ever saw a ghost: that

these are the delusive visions of women and children, or of men whose

intellects are impaired by some physical infirmity, and who believe that

their diseased imaginations are of divine origin. But if Dion and

Brutus, men of strong and philosophic minds, whose understandings were

not affected by any constitutional infirmity--if such men could place so

much faith in the appearance of spectres as to give an account of them

to their friends, I see no reason why we should depart from the opinion

of the ancients that men had their evil genii, who disturbed them with

fears and distressed their virtues ..."

In the opening of the _Philopseudus_, Lucian asks what it is that makes

men so fond of a lie, and comments on their delight in romancing

themselves, which is only equalled by the earnest attention with which

they receive other people's efforts in the same direction. Tychiades

goes on to describe his visit to Eucrates, a distinguished philosopher,

who was ill in bed. With him were a Stoic, a Peripatetic, a Pythagorean,

a Platonist, and a doctor, who began to tell stories so absurd and

abounding in such monstrous superstition that he ended by leaving them

in disgust. None of us have, of course, ever been present at similar

gatherings, where, after starting with the inevitable Glamis mystery,

everybody in the room has set to work to outdo his neighbour in

marvellous yarns, drawing on his imagination for additional material,

and, like Eucrates, being ready to stake the lives of his children on

his veracity.

Another scoffer was Democritus of Abdera, who was so firmly convinced of

the non-existence of ghosts that he took up his abode in a tomb and

lived there night and day for a long time. Classical ghosts seem to have

affected black rather than white as their favourite colour. Among the

features of the gruesome entertainments with which Domitian loved to

terrify his Senators were handsome boys, who appeared naked with their

bodies painted black, like ghosts, and performed a wild dance.[29] On

the following day one of them was generally sent as a present to each

Senator. Some boys in the neighbourhood wished to shake Democritus's

unbelief, so they dressed themselves in black with masks like skulls

upon their heads and danced round the tomb where he lived. But, to their

annoyance, he only put his head out and told them to go away and stop

playing the fool.

The Greek and Roman stories hardly come up to the standards required by

the Society for Psychical Research. They are purely popular, and the

ghost is regarded as the deceased person, permitted or condemned by the

powers of the lower world to hold communication with survivors on earth.

Naturally, they were never submitted to critical inquiry, and there is

no foreshadowing of any of the modern theories, that the phenomenon, if

caused by the deceased, is not necessarily the deceased, though it may

be an indication that "some kind of force is being exercised after death

which is in some way connected with a person previously known on earth,"

or that the apparitions may be purely local, or due entirely to

subjective hallucination on the part of the person beholding them.

Strangely enough, we rarely find any of those interesting cases,

everywhere so well attested, of people appearing just about the time of

their death to friends or relatives to whom they are particularly

attached, or with whom they have made a compact that they will appear,

should they die first, if it is possible. The classical instance of this

is the well-known story of Lord Brougham who, while taking a warm bath

in Sweden, saw a school friend whom he had not met for many years, but

with whom he had long ago "committed the folly of drawing up an

agreement written with our blood, to the effect that whichever of us

died first should appear to the other, and thus solve any doubts we had

entertained of the life after death." There are, however, a number of

stories of the passing of souls, which are curiously like some of those

collected by the Society for Psychical Research, in the Fourth Book of

Gregory the Great's Dialogues.

Another noticeable difference is that apparitions in most

well-authenticated modern ghost stories are of a comforting character,

whereas those in the ancient world are nearly all the reverse. This

difference we may attribute to the entire change in the aspect of the

future life which we owe to modern Christianity. As we have seen, there

was little that was comforting in the life after death as conceived by

the old pagan religions, while in medieval times the horrors of hell

were painted in the most lurid colours, and were emphasized more than

the joys of heaven.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 25: Cic., _Murena_, 27.]

[Footnote 26: _Ep._, i. 18.]

[Footnote 27: _Ibid._, 3. 5. 4.]

[Footnote 28: Chap. II]

[Footnote 29: Dio Cass., _Domitian_, 9.]

III

STORIES OF HAUNTING

In a letter to Sura[30] the younger Pliny gives us what may be taken as

a prototype of all later haunted-house stories. At one time in Athens

there was a roomy old house where nobody could be induced to live. In

the dead of night the sound of clanking chains would be heard, distant

at first, proceeding doubtless from the garden behind or the inner court

of the house, then gradually drawing nearer and nearer, till at last

there appeared the figure of an old man with a long beard, thin and

emaciated, with chains on his hands and feet. The house was finally

abandoned, and advertised to be let or sold at an absurdly low price.

The philosopher Athenodorus read the notice on his arrival in Athens,

but the smallness of the sum asked aroused his suspicions. However, as

soon as he heard the story he took the house. He had his bed placed in

the front court, close to the main door, dismissed his slaves, and

prepared to pass the night there, reading and writing, in order to

prevent his thoughts from wandering to the ghost. He worked on for some

time without anything happening; but at last the clanking of chains was

heard in the distance. Athenodorus did not raise his eyes or stop his

work, but kept his attention fixed and listened. The sounds gradually

drew nearer, and finally entered the room where he was sitting. Then he

turned round and saw the apparition. It beckoned him to follow, but he

signed to it to wait and went on with his work. Not till it came and

clanked its chains over his very head would he take up a lamp and follow

it. The figure moved slowly forward, seemingly weighed down with its

heavy chains, until it reached an open space in the courtyard. There it

vanished. Athenodorus marked the spot with leaves and grass, and on the

next day the ground was dug up in the presence of a magistrate, when the

skeleton of a man with some rusty chains was discovered. The remains

were buried with all ceremony, and the apparition was no more seen.

Lucian tells the same story in the _Philopseudus_, with some ridiculous

additions, thoroughly in keeping with the surroundings.

An almost exactly similar story has been preserved by Robert Wodrow, the

indefatigable collector, in a notebook which he appears to have intended

to be the foundation of a scientific collection of marvellous tales.

Wodrow died early in the eighteenth century. Gilbert Rule, the founder

and first Principal of Edinburgh University, once reached a desolate inn

in a lonely spot on the Grampians. The inn was full, and they were

obliged to make him up a bed in a house near-by that had been vacant for

thirty years. "He walked some time in the room," says Wodrow,[31] "and

committed himself to God's protection, and went to bed. There were two

candles left on the table, and these he put out. There was a large

bright fire remaining. He had not been long in bed till the room door is

opened and an apparition in shape of a country tradesman came in, and

opened the curtains without speaking a word. Mr. Rule was resolved to do

nothing till it should speak or attack him, but lay still with full

composure, committing himself to the Divine protection and conduct. The

apparition went to the table, lighted the two candles, brought them to

the bedside, and made some steps toward the door, looking still to the

bed, as if he would have Mr. Rule rising and following. Mr. Rule still

lay still, till he should see his way further cleared. Then the

apparition, who the whole time spoke none, took an effectual way to

raise the doctor. He carried back the candles to the table and went to

the fire, and with the tongs took down the kindled coals, and laid them

on the deal chamber floor. The doctor then thought it time to rise and

put on his clothes, in the time of which the spectre laid up the coals

again in the chimney, and, going to the table, lifted the candles and

went to the door, opened it, still looking to the Principal, as he would

have him following the candles, which he now, thinking there was

something extraordinary in the case, after looking to God for direction,

inclined to do. The apparition went down some steps with the candles,

and carried them into a long trance, at the end of which there was a

stair which carried down to a low room. This the spectre went down, and

stooped, and set down the lights on the lowest step of the stair, and

straight disappears."

"The learned Principal," continues Burton, "whose courage and coolness

deserve the highest commendation, lighted himself back to bed with the

candles, and took the remainder of his rest undisturbed. Being a man of

great sagacity, on ruminating over his adventure, he informed the

Sheriff of the county 'that he was much of the mind there was murder in

the case.' The stone whereon the candles were placed was raised, and

there 'the plain remains of a human body were found, and bones, to the

conviction of all.' It was supposed to be an old affair, however, and no

traces could be got of the murderer. Rule undertook the functions of the

detective, and pressed into the service the influence of his own

profession. He preached a great sermon on the occasion, to which all the

neighbouring people were summoned; and behold in the time of his sermon,

an old man near eighty years was awakened, and fell a-weeping, and

before the whole company acknowledged that at the building of that

house, he was the murderer."

The main features of the story have changed very little in the course of

ages, except in the important point of the conviction of the murderer,

which would have been effected in a very different way in a Greek story.

Doubtless a similar tale could be found in the folk-lore of almost any

nation.

Plutarch[32] relates how, in his native city of Chæronæa, a certain

Damon had been murdered in some baths. Ghosts continued to haunt the

spot ever afterwards, and mysterious groans were heard, so that at last

the doors were walled up. "And to this very day," he continues, "those

who live in the neighbourhood imagine that they see strange sights and

are terrified with cries of sorrow."

It is quite clear from Plautus that ghost stories, even if not taken

very seriously, aroused a wide-spread interest in the average Roman of

his day, just as they do in the average Briton of our own. They were

doubtless discussed in a half-joking way. The apparitions were generally

believed to frighten people, just as they are at present, though the

well-authenticated stories of such occurrences would seem to show that

genuine ghosts, or whatever one likes to call them, have the power of

paralyzing fear.

In the _Mostellaria_,[33] Plautus uses a ghost as a recognized piece of

supernatural machinery. The regulation father of Roman comedy has gone

away on a journey, and in the meantime the son has, as usual, almost

reached the end of his father's fortune. The father comes back

unexpectedly, and the son turns in despair to his faithful slave,

Tranio, for help. Tranio is equal to the occasion, and undertakes to

frighten the inconvenient parent away again. He gives an account of an

apparition that has been seen, and has announced that it is the ghost of

a stranger from over-seas, who has been dead for six years.

"Here must I dwell," it had declared, "for the gods of the lower world

will not receive me, seeing that I died before my time. My host murdered

me, his guest, villain that he was, for the gold that I carried, and

secretly buried me, without funeral rites, in this house. Be gone hence,

therefore, for it is accursed and unholy ground." This story is enough

for the father. He takes the advice, and does not return till Tranio and

his dutiful son are quite ready for him.

Great battlefields are everywhere believed to be haunted. Tacitus[34]

relates how, when Titus was besieging Jerusalem, armies were seen

fighting in the sky; and at a much later date, after a great battle

against Attila and the Huns, under the walls of Rome, the ghosts of the

dead fought for three days and three nights, and the clash of their arms

was distinctly heard.[35] Marathon is no exception to the rule.

Pausanias[36] says that any night you may hear horses neighing and men

fighting there. To go on purpose to see the sight never brought good to

any man; but with him who unwittingly lights upon it the spirits are not

angry. He adds that the people of Marathon worship the men who fell in

the battle as heroes; and who could be more worthy of such honour than

they? The battle itself was not without its marvellous side. Epizelus,

the Athenian, used to relate how a huge hoplite, whose beard

over-shadowed all his shield, stood over against him in the thick of the

fight. The apparition passed him by and killed the man next him, but

Epizelus came out of the battle blind, and remained so for the rest of

his life.[37] Plutarch[38] also relates of a place in Boeotia where a

battle had been fought, that there is a stream running by, and that

people imagine that they hear panting horses in the roaring waters.

But the strangest account of the habitual haunting of great battlefields

is to be found in Philostratus's _Heroica_, which represents the spirits

of the Homeric heroes as still closely connected with Troy and its

neighbourhood. How far the stories are based on local tradition it is

impossible to say; they are told by a vine-dresser, who declares that he

lives under the protection of Protesilaus. At one time he was in danger

of being violently ousted from all his property, when the ghost of

Protesilaus appeared to the would-be despoiler in a vision, and struck

him blind. The great man was so terrified at this event that he carried

his depredations no further; and the vine-dresser has since continued to

cultivate what remained of his property under the protection of the

hero, with whom he lives on most intimate terms. Protesilaus often

appears to him while he is at work and has long talks with him, and he

keeps off wild beasts and disease from the land.

Not only Protesilaus, but also his men, and, in fact, virtually all of

the "giants of the mighty bone and bold emprise" who fought round Troy,

can be seen on the plain at night, clad like warriors, with nodding

plumes. The inhabitants are keenly interested in these apparitions, and

well they may be, as so much depends upon them. If the heroes are

covered with dust, a drought is impending; if with sweat, they

foreshadow rain. Blood upon their arms means a plague; but if they show

themselves without any distinguishing mark, all will be well.

Though the heroes are dead, they cannot be insulted with impunity. Ajax

was popularly believed, owing to the form taken by his madness, to be

especially responsible for any misfortune that might befall flocks and

herds. On one occasion some shepherds, who had had bad luck with their

cattle, surrounded his tomb and abused him, bringing up all the weak

points in his earthly career recorded by Homer. At last they went too

far for his patience, and a terrible voice was heard in the tomb and the

clash of armour. The offenders fled in terror, but came to no harm.

On another occasion some strangers were playing at draughts near his

shrine, when Ajax appeared and begged them to stop, as the game reminded

him of Palamedes.

Hector was a far more dangerous person. Maximus of Tyre[39] says that

the people of Ilium often see him bounding over the plain at dead of

night in flashing armour--a truly Homeric picture. Maximus cannot,

indeed, boast of having seen Hector, though he also has had his visions

vouchsafed him. He had seen Castor and Pollux, like twin stars, above

his ship, steering it through a storm. Æsculapius also he has

seen--not in a dream, by Hercules, but with his waking eyes. But to

return to Hector. Philostratus says that one day an unfortunate boy

insulted him in the same way in which the shepherds had treated Ajax.

Homer, however, did not satisfy this boy, and as a parting shaft he

declared that the statue in Ilium did not really represent Hector, but

Achilles. Nothing happened immediately, but not long afterwards, while

the boy was driving a team of ponies, Hector appeared in the form of a

warrior in a brook which was, as a rule, so small as not even to have a

name. He was heard shouting in a foreign tongue as he pursued the boy in

the stream, finally overtaking and drowning him with his ponies. The

bodies were never afterwards recovered.

Philostratus gives us a quantity of details about the Homeric heroes,

which the vine-dresser has picked up in his talks with Protesilaus. Most

of the heroes can be easily recognized. Achilles, for instance, enters

into conversation with various people, and goes out hunting. He can be

recognized by his height and his beauty and his bright armour; and as he

rushes past he is usually accompanied by a whirlwind--[Greek: podarkês,

dios], even after death.

Then we hear the story of the White Isle. Helen and Achilles fell in

love with one another, though they had never met--the one hidden in

Egypt, the other fighting before Troy. There was no place near Troy

suited for their eternal life together, so Thetis appealed to Poseidon

to give them an island home of their own. Poseidon consented, and the

White Isle rose up in the Black Sea, near the mouth of the Danube. There

Achilles and Helen, the manliest of men and the most feminine of women,

first met and first embraced; and Poseidon himself, and Amphitrite, and

all the Nereids, and as many river gods and spirits as dwell near the

Euxine and Mæotis, came to the wedding. The island is thickly covered

with white trees and with elms, which grow in regular order round the

shrine; and on it there dwell certain white birds, fragrant of the salt

sea, which Achilles is said to have tamed to his will, so that they keep

the glades cool, fanning them with their wings and scattering spray as

they fly along the ground, scarce rising above it. To men sailing over

the broad bosom of the sea the island is holy when they disembark, for

it lies like a hospitable home to their ships. But neither those who

sail thither, nor the Greeks and barbarians living round the Black Sea,

may build a house upon it; and all who anchor and sacrifice there must

go on board at sunset. No man may pass the night upon the isle, and no

woman may even land there. If the wind is favourable, ships must sail

away; if not, they must put out and anchor in the bay and sleep on

board. For at night men say that Achilles and Helen drink together, and

sing of each other's love, and of the war, and of Homer. Now that his

battles are over, Achilles cultivates the gift of song he had received

from Calliope. Their voices ring out clear and godlike over the water,

and the sailors sit trembling with emotion as they listen. Those who

had anchored there declared that they had heard the neighing of horses,

and the clash of arms, and shouts such as are raised in battle.

Maximus of Tyre[40] also describes the island, and tells how sailors

have often seen a fair-haired youth dancing a war-dance in golden armour

upon it; and how once, when one of them unwittingly slept there,

Achilles woke him, and took him to his tent and entertained him.

Patroclus poured the wine and Achilles played the lyre, while Thetis

herself is said to have been present with a choir of other deities.

If they anchor to the north or the south of the island, and a breeze

springs up that makes the harbours dangerous, Achilles warns them, and

bids them change their anchorage and avoid the wind. Sailors relate how,

"when they first behold the island, they embrace each other and burst

into tears of joy. Then they put in and kiss the land, and go to the

temple to pray and to sacrifice to Achilles." Victims stand ready of

their own accord at the altar, according to the size of the ship and the

number of those on board.

Pausanias also mentions the White Isle.[41] On one occasion, Leonymus,

while leading the people of Croton against the Italian Locrians,

attacked the spot where he was informed that Ajax Oïleus, on whom the

people of Locris had called for help, was posted in the van. According

to Conon,[42] who, by the way, calls the hero Autoleon, when the people

of Croton went to war, they also left a vacant space for Ajax in the

forefront of their line. However this may be, Leonymus was wounded in

the breast, and as the wound refused to heal and weakened him

considerably, he applied to Delphi for advice. The god told him to sail

to the White Isle, where Ajax would heal him of his wound. Thither,

therefore, he went, and was duly healed. On his return he described what

he had seen--how that Achilles was now married to Helen; and it was

Leonymus who told Stesichorus that his blindness was due to Helen's

wrath, and thus induced him to write the _Palinode_.

Achilles himself is once said to have appeared to a trader who

frequently visited the island. They talked of Troy, and then the hero

gave him wine, and bade him sail away and fetch him a certain Trojan

maiden who was the slave of a citizen of Ilium. The trader was surprised

at the request, and ventured to ask why he wanted a Trojan slave.

Achilles replied that it was because she was of the same race as Hector

and his ancestors, and of the blood of the sons of Priam and Dardanus.

The trader thought that Achilles was in love with the girl, whom he duly

brought with him on his next visit to the island. Achilles thanked him,

and bade him keep her on board the ship, doubtless because women were

not allowed to land. In the evening he was entertained by Achilles and

Helen, and his host gave him a large sum of money, promising to make

him his guest-friend and to bring luck to his ship and his business. At

daybreak Achilles dismissed him, telling him to leave the girl on the

shore. When they had gone about a furlong from the island, a horrible

cry from the maiden reached their ears, and they saw Achilles tearing

her to pieces, rending her limb from limb.

In this brutal savage it is impossible to recognize Homer's chivalrous

hero, who sacrificed the success of a ten years' war, fought originally

for the recovery of one woman, to his grief at the loss of another, and

has thus made it possible to describe the _Iliad_ as the greatest

love-poem ever written. One cannot help feeling that Pindar's Isle of

the Blest, whither he was brought by Thetis, whose mother's prayer had

moved the Heart of Zeus, to dwell with Cadmus and Peleus, is Achilles'

true home; or the isle of the heroes of all time, described by Carducci,

where King Lear sits telling OEdipus of his sufferings, and Cordelia

calls to Antigone, "Come, my Greek sister! We will sing of peace to our

fathers." Helen and Iseult, silent and thoughtful, roam under the shade

of the myrtles, while the setting sun kisses their golden hair with its

reddening rays. Helen gazes across the sea, but King Mark opens his arms

to Iseult, and the fair head sinks on the mighty beard. Clytemnestra

stands by the shore with the Queen of Scots. They bathe their white arms

in the waves, but the waves recoil swollen with red blood, while the

wailing of the hapless women echoes along the rocky strand. Among these

heroic souls Shelley alone of modern poets--that Titan spirit in a

maiden's form--may find a place, according to Carducci, caught up by

Sophocles from the living embrace of Thetis.[43]

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 30: _Ep._, vii. 27.]

[Footnote 31: Burton's _The Book-Hunter: Robert Wodrow_.]

[Footnote 32: _Cimon_, i.]

[Footnote 33: II. 5. 67.]

[Footnote 34: _Hist._, v. 13.]

[Footnote 35: Damascius, _Vita Isidori_, 63.]

[Footnote 36: I. 32. 4.]

[Footnote 37: Herod., vi. 117.]

[Footnote 38: _Parallel_, 7.]

[Footnote 39: _Dissert._, 15. 7.]

[Footnote 40: _Dissert._, 15. 7.]

[Footnote 41: 3. 19. 12.]

[Footnote 42: _Narr._, 18.]

[Footnote 43: G. Carducci, "Presso l'urna di P.B. Shelley," in the _Odi

Barbare_.]

IV

NECROMANCY

The belief that it was possible to call up the souls of the dead by

means of spells was almost universal in antiquity. We know that even

Saul, who had himself cut off those that had familiar spirits and the

wizards out of the land, disguised himself and went with two others to

consult the witch of En-dor; that she called up the spirit of Samuel at

his request; that Samuel asked Saul, "Why hast thou disquieted me, to

bring me up?" and then prophesied his ruin and death at the hands of the

Philistines at Mount Gilboa. We find frequent references to the practice

in classical literature. The elder Pliny[44] gives us the interesting

information that spirits refuse to obey people afflicted with freckles.

There were always certain spots hallowed by tradition as particularly

favourable to intercourse with the dead, or even as being actual

entrances to the lower world. For instance, at Heraclea in Pontus there

was a famous [Greek: psychomanteion], or place where the souls of the

dead could be conjured up and consulted, as Hercules was believed to

have dragged Cerberus up to earth here. Other places supposed to be

connected with this myth had a similar legend attached to them, as also

did all places where Pluto was thought to have carried off Persephone.

Thus we hear of entrances to Hades at Eleusis,[45] at Colonus,[46] at

Enna in Sicily,[47] and finally at the lovely pool of Cyane, up the

Anapus River, near Syracuse, one of the few streams in which the papyrus

still flourishes.[48] Lakes and seas also were frequently believed to be

entrances to Hades.[49]

Greek and Roman Ghost Stories · 第 1 / 4 段