I say the signs of revolt on the part of the lady class—revolt long

delayed but now spreading all along the line—are evident enough. When,

however, we come to the second type of woman mentioned in the preceding

pages, the working wife, we—naturally enough—do not find much conscious

movement. The life of the household drudge is too like that of a slave,

too much consumed in mere toil, too little illuminated by any knowledge,

for her to rise of herself to any other conception of existence.

Nevertheless it is not difficult to see that general and social changes

are working to bring about her liberation also. Improved

house-construction, public bakeries and laundries, and so forth, and,

what is much more important, a more rational and simple and healthful

notion of food and furniture, are tending very largely to reduce the

labors of Housework and Cookery; and conservative though women are in

their habits, when these changes are brought to their doors they cannot

but see the advantage of them. Public institutions too are more and more

taking over the responsibilities and the cost of educating and rearing

children; and even here and there we may discern a drift towards the

amalgamation of households, which by introducing a common life and

division of labor among the women-folk will probably do much to cheer

and lighten their lot. None of these changes, however, will be of great

use unless or until they wake the overworked woman herself to see and

insist on her rights to a better life, and until they force from the man

a frank acknowledgment of her claim. And surely here and there the man

himself will do something to educate his mate to this point. We see no

reason indeed why he should not assist in some part of the domestic

work, and thus contribute his share of labor and intelligence to the

conduct of the house; nor why the woman—being thus relieved—should not

occasionally, and when desirable, find salaried work outside, and so

contribute to the maintenance of the family, and to her own security and

sense of independence. The over-differentiation of the labors of the

sexes to-day is at once a perpetuation of the servitude of women and a

cause of misunderstanding between her and man, and of lack of interest

in each other’s doings.

The third type of woman, the prostitute, provides us with that question

which—according to Bebel—is the sphinx-riddle that modern society cannot

solve, and yet which unsolved threatens society’s destruction. The

commercial prostitution of love is the last outcome of our whole social

system, and its most clear condemnation. It flaunts in our streets, it

hides itself in the garment of respectability under the name of

matrimony, it eats in actual physical disease and death right through

our midst; it is fed by the oppression and the ignorance of women, by

their poverty and denied means of livelihood, and by the hypocritical

puritanism which forbids them by millions not only to gratify but even

to speak of their natural desires; and it is encouraged by the

callousness of an age which has accustomed men to buy and sell for money

every most precious thing—even the life-long labor of their brothers,

therefore why not also the very bodies of their sisters?

Here there is no solution except the freedom of woman—which means of

course also the freedom of the masses of the people, men and women, and

the ceasing altogether of economic slavery. There is no solution which

will not include the redemption of the terms “free woman” and “free

love” to their true and rightful significance. Let every woman whose

heart bleeds for the sufferings of her sex, hasten to declare herself

and to constitute herself, as far as she possibly can, a free woman. Let

her accept the term with all the odium that belongs to it; let her

insist on her right to speak, dress, think, act, and above all to use

her sex, as she deems best; let her face the scorn and the ridicule; let

her “lose her own life” if she likes; assured that only so can come

deliverance, and that only when the free woman is honored will the

prostitute cease to exist. And let every man who really would respect

his counterpart, entreat her also to act so; let him never by word or

deed tempt her to grant as a bargain what can only be precious as a

gift; let him see her with pleasure stand a little aloof; let him help

her to gain her feet; so at last, by what slight sacrifices on his part

such a course may involve, will it dawn upon him that he has gained a

real companion and helpmate on life’s journey.

The whole evil of commercial prostitution arises out of the domination

of Man in matters of sex. Better indeed were a Saturnalia of free men

and women than the spectacle which as it is our great cities present at

night. Here in Sex, the women’s instincts are, as a rule, so clean, so

direct, so well-rooted in the needs of the race, that except for man’s

domination they would scarcely have suffered this perversion. Sex in man

is an unorganized passion, an individual need or impetus; but in woman

it may more properly be termed a constructive instinct, with the larger

signification that that involves. Even more than man should woman be

“free” to work out the problem of her sex-relations as may commend

itself best to her—hampered as little as possible by legal,

conventional, or economic considerations, and relying chiefly on her own

native sense and tact in the matter. Once thus free—free from the mere

cash-nexus to a husband, from the money-slavery of the streets, from the

nameless terrors of social opinion, and from the threats of the choice

of perpetual virginity or perpetual bondage—would she not indeed choose

her career (whether that of wife and mother, or that of free companion,

or one of single blessedness) far better for herself than it is chosen

for her to-day—regarding really in some degree the needs of society, and

the welfare of children, and the sincerity and durability of her

relations to her lovers, and less the petty motives of profit and fear?

The point is that the whole conception of a nobler Womanhood for the

future has to proceed candidly from this basis of her complete freedom

as to the disposal of her sex, and from the healthy conviction that,

with whatever individual aberrations, she will on the whole use that

freedom rationally and well. And surely this—in view too of some decent

education of the young on sexual matters—is not too great a demand to

make on our faith in women. If it is, then indeed we are undone—for

short of this we can only retain them in servitude, and society in its

form of the hell on earth which it largely is to-day.

Refreshing therefore in its way is the spirit of revolt which is

spreading on all sides. Let us hope such revolt will continue. If it

lead here and there to strained or false situations, or to temporary

misunderstandings—still, declared enmity is better than unreal

acquiescence. Too long have women acted the part of mere appendages to

the male, suppressing their own individuality and fostering his

self-conceit. In order to have souls of their own they must free

themselves, and greatly by their own efforts. They must learn to fight.

Whitman in his poem “A Woman Waits for Me,” draws a picture of a woman

who stands in the sharpest possible contrast with the feeble bourgeois

ideal—a woman who can “swim, row, ride, wrestle, shoot, run, strike,

retreat, defend herself,” etc.; and Bebel, in his book on Woman, while

pointing out that in Sparta, “where the greatest attention was paid to

the physical development of both sexes, boys and girls went about naked

till they had reached the age of puberty, and were trained together in

bodily exercises, games and wrestling,” complains that now-a-days “the

notion that women require strength, courage and resolution is regarded

as very heterodox.” But the truth is that qualities of courage and

independence are not agreeable in a slave, and that is why man during

all these centuries has consistently discountenanced them—till at last

the female herself has come to consider them “unwomanly.” Yet this last

epithet is absurd; for if tenderness is the crown and glory of woman,

nothing can be more certain than that true tenderness is only found in

strong and courageous natures; the tenderness of a servile person is no

tenderness at all.

It has not escaped the attention of thinkers on these subjects that the

rise of Women into freedom and larger social life here alluded to—and

already indeed indicated by the march of events—is likely to have a

profound influence on the future of our race, It is pointed out that

among most of the higher animals, and indeed among many of the early

races of mankind, the males have been selected by the females on account

of their prowess or superior strength or beauty, and this has led to the

evolution in the males and in the race at large of a type which (in a

dim and unconscious manner) was the ideal of the female.[11] But as soon

as in the history of mankind the property-love set in, and woman became

the chattel of man, this action ceased. She, being no longer free, could

not possibly choose man, but rather the opposite took place, and man

began to select woman for the characteristics pleasing to him. The

latter now adorned herself to gratify his taste, and the female type and

consequently the type of the whole race have been correspondingly

affected. With the return of woman to freedom the ideal of the female

may again resume its sway. It is possible indeed that the more dignified

and serious attitude of women towards sex may give to sexual selection

when exercised by them a nobler influence than when exercised by the

males. Anyhow it is not difficult to see that women really free would

never countenance for their mates the many mean and unclean types of men

who to-day seem to have things all their own way, nor consent to have

children by such men; nor is it difficult to imagine that the feminine

influence might thus sway to the evolution of a more manly and dignified

race than has been disclosed in these last days of commercial

civilization!

The Modern Woman with her clubs, her debates, her politics, her freedom

of action and costume, is forming a public opinion of her own at an

amazing rate; and seems to be preparing to “spank” and even thump the

Middle-class Man in real earnest! What exactly evolution may be

preparing for us, we do not know, but apparently some lively sparring

matches between the sexes. Of course all will not be smooth sailing. The

women of the new movement are naturally largely drawn from those in whom

the maternal instinct is not especially strong; also from those in whom

the sexual instinct is not preponderant. Such women do not altogether

represent their sex; some are rather mannish in temperament; some are

“homogenic,” that is, inclined to attachments to their own, rather than

to the opposite, sex; some are ultra-rationalizing and brain-cultured;

to many, children are more or less a bore; to others, man’s sex-passion

is a mere impertinence, which they do not understand, and whose place

they consequently misjudge. It would not do to say that the majority of

the new movement are thus out of line, but there is no doubt that a

large number are; and the course of their progress will be

correspondingly curvilinear.

Perhaps the deficiency in maternal instinct would seem the most serious

imputation. But then, who knows (as we have said) what evolution is

preparing? Sometimes it seems possible that a new sex is on the

make—like the feminine neuters of Ants and Bees—not adapted for

child-bearing, but with a marvelous and perfect instinct of social

service, indispensable for the maintenance of the common life. Certainly

most of those who are freeing themselves—often with serious

struggles—from the “lady” chrysalis are fired with an ardent social

enthusiasm; and if they may personally differ in some respects from the

average of their sex, it is certain that their efforts will result in a

tremendous improvement in the general position of their more commonplace

sisters.

If it should turn out that a certain fraction of the feminine sex should

for one reason or another not devote itself to the work of maternity,

still the influence of this section would react on the others to render

their notion of motherhood far more dignified than before. There is not

much doubt that in the future this most important of human labors will

be carried on with a degree of conscious intelligence hitherto unknown,

and which will raise it from the fulfilment of a mere instinct to the

completion of a splendid social purpose. To save the souls of children

as well as their bodies, to raise heroic as well as prosperous citizens,

will surely be the desire and the work of the mothers of our race.[12]

It will perhaps be said that after going about to show (as in the

previous chapter) the deficiency of women hitherto in the matter of the

generalizing faculty, it is somewhat inconsistent to express any great

hope that they will ever take much active interest in the general social

life to which they belong; but indeed the answer to this is that they

are already beginning to do so. The social enthusiasm and activity shown

by women in Britain, Russia, and the United States is so great and

well-rooted that it is impossible to believe it a mere ephemeral event;

and though in the older of these countries it is at present confined to

the more wealthy classes, we can augur from that—according to a

well-known principle—that it will in time spread downwards to the women

of the nation.

Important as is the tendency of women in the countries mentioned to

higher education and brain development, I think it is evident that the

widening and socialization of their interests is not taking place so

much through mere study of books and the passing of examinations in

political economy and other sciences, as through the extended actual

experience which the life of the day is bringing to them. Certainly the

book-studies are important and must not be neglected; but above all is

it imperative (and men, if they are to have any direct sway in the

future destinies of the other sex, must look to it) that women, so long

confined to the narrowest mere routine and limited circle of domestic

life, should see and get experience, all they can, of the actual world.

The theory, happily now exploding, of keeping them “innocent” through

sheer ignorance partakes too much of the “angel and idiot” view. To see

the life of slum and palace and workshop, to enter into the trades and

professions, to become doctors, nurses, and so forth, to have to look

after themselves and to hold their own as against men, to travel, to

meet with sexual experience, to work together in trade-unions, to join

in social and political uprisings and rebellions, etc., is what women

want just now. And it is evident enough that at any rate among the more

prosperous sections in this country such a movement is going on apace.

If the existence of the enormous hordes of unattached females that we

find living on interest and dividends to-day is a blemish from a

Socialistic point of view; if we find them on the prowl all over the

country, filling the theaters and concert-rooms and public

entertainments in the proportion of three to one male, besetting the

trains, swarming onto the tops of the ’buses, dodging on bicycles under

the horses’ heads, making speeches at street corners, blocking the very

pavements in the front of fashionable shops, we must not forget that for

the objects we have just sketched, even this class is going the most

direct way to work, and laying in stores of experience, which will make

it impossible for it ever to return to the petty life of times gone by.

At the last, and after centuries of misunderstanding and association of

triviality and superficiality with the female sex, it will perhaps dawn

upon the world that the truth really lies in an opposite direction—that,

in a sense, there is something more deep-lying fundamental and primitive

in the woman nature than in that of the man; that instead of being the

over-sensitive hysterical creature that civilization has too often made

her, she is essentially of calm large and acceptive even though

emotional temperament. “Her shape arises,” says Walt Whitman,

“She less guarded than ever, yet more guarded than ever,

The gross and soil’d she moves among do not make her gross and soil’d,

She knows the thoughts as she passes, nothing is concealed from her,

She is none the less considerate or friendly therefor,

She is the best belov’d, it is without exception; she has no reason to

fear, and she does not fear.”

The Greek goddesses look down and across the ages to the very outposts

beyond civilization; and already from far America, Australasia, Africa,

Norway, Russia, as even in our midst from those who have crossed the

border-line of all class and caste, glance forth the features of a

grander type—fearless and untamed—the primal merging into the future

Woman; who, combining broad sense with sensibility, the passion for

Nature with the love of Man, and commanding indeed the details of life,

yet risen out of localism and convention, will help us to undo the bands

of death which encircle the present society, and open the doors to a new

and a wider life.

MARRIAGE

A RETROSPECT

Of the great mystery of human Love, and that most intimate personal

relation of two souls to each other—perhaps the firmest, most basic and

indissoluble fact (after our own existence) that we know; of that

strange sense—often, perhaps generally, instantaneous—of long precedent

familiarity and kinship, that deep reliance on and acceptation of

another in his or her entirety; of the tremendous strength of the chain

which thus at times will bind two hearts in life-long dedication and

devotion, persuading and indeed not seldom compelling the persons

concerned to the sacrifice of some of the other elements of their lives

and characters; and, withal, of a certain inscrutable veiledness from

each other which so frequently accompanies the relation of the opposite

sexes, and which forms at once the abiding charm, and the pain,

sometimes the tragedy, of their union; of this palpitating winged living

thing, which one may perhaps call the real Marriage—I would say but

little; for indeed it is only fitting or possible to speak of it by

indirect language and suggestion, nor may one venture to rudely drag it

from its sanctuary into the light of the common gaze.

Compared with this, the actual marriage, in its squalid perversity as we

too often have occasion of knowing it, is as the wretched idol of the

savage to the reality which it is supposed to represent; and one seems

to hear the Aristophanic laughter of the gods as they contemplate man’s

little clay image of the Heavenly Love—which, cracked in the fire of

daily life, he is fain to bind together with rusty hoops of law, and

parchment bonds, lest it should crumble and fall to pieces altogether.

The whole subject, wide as life itself—as Heaven and Hell—eludes

anything like adequate treatment, and we need make no apology for

narrowing down our considerations here to just a few practical points;

and if we cannot navigate upward into the very heart of the

matter—namely, into the causes which make some people love each other

with a true and perfect love, and others unite in obedience to but a

counterfeit passion—yet we may fairly, I imagine, study some of the

conditions which give to actual marriage its present form, or which in

the future are likely to provide real affection with a more satisfactory

expression than it has as a rule to-day.

As long as man is only half-grown, and woman is a serf or a parasite, it

can hardly be expected that Marriage should be particularly successful.

Two people come together, who know but little of each other, who have

been brought up along different lines, who certainly do not understand

each other’s nature; whose mental interests and occupations are

different, whose worldly interests and advantage are also different; to

one of whom the subject of sex is probably a sealed book, to the other

perhaps a book whose most dismal page has been opened first. The man

needs an outlet for his passion; the girl is looking for a “home” and a

proprietor. A glamor of illusion descends upon the two, and drives them

into each other’s arms. It envelopes in a gracious and misty halo all

their differences and misapprehensions. They marry without misgiving;

and their hearts overflow with gratitude to the white-surpliced old

gentleman who reads the service over them.

But at a later hour, and with calmer thought, they begin to realize that

it is a life-sentence which he has so suavely passed upon them—not

reducible (as in the case of ordinary convicts) even to a term of 20

years. The brief burst of their first satisfaction has been followed by

satiety on the physical plane, then by mere vacuity of affection, then

by boredom, and even nausea. The girl, full perhaps of a tender emotion,

and missing the sympathy and consolation she expected in the man’s love,

only to find its more materialistic side—“This, this then is what I am

wanted for;” the man, who looked for a companion, finding he can rouse

no mortal interest in his wife’s mind save in the most exasperating

trivialities;—whatever the cause may be, a veil has fallen from before

their faces, and there they sit, held together now by the least

honorable interests, the interests which they themselves can least

respect, but to which Law and Religion lend all their weight. The

monetary dependence of the woman, the mere sex-needs of the man, the

fear of public opinion, all form motives, and motives of the meanest

kind, for maintaining the seeming tie; and the relation of the two

hardens down into a dull neutrality, in which lives and characters are

narrowed and blunted, and deceit becomes the common weapon which guards

divided interests.

A sad picture! and of course in this case a portrayal deliberately of

the seamy side of the matter. But who shall say what agonies are often

gone through in those first few years of married life? Anyhow, this is

the sort of problem which we have to face to-day, and which shows its

actuality by the amazing rate at which it is breaking out in literature

on all sides.

It may be said—and often of course is said—that such cases as these only

prove that marriage was entered into under the influence of a passing

glamor and delusion, and that there was not much real devotion to begin

with. And no doubt there is truth enough in such remarks. But—we may say

in reply—because two people make a mistake in youth, to condemn them,

for that reason, to life-long suffering and mutual degradation, or to

see them so condemned, without proposing any hope or way of deliverance,

but with the one word “serves you right” on the lips, is a course which

can commend itself only to the grimmest and dullest Calvinist. Whatever

safeguards against a too frivolous view of the relationship may be

proposed by the good sense of society in the future, it is certain that

the time has gone past when Marriage can continue to be regarded as a

supernatural institution to whose maintenance human bodies and souls

must be indiscriminately sacrificed; a humaner, wiser, and less

panic-stricken treatment of the subject must set in; and if there are

difficulties in the way they must be met by patient and calm

consideration of human welfare—superior to any law, however ancient and

respectable.

I take it then that, without disguising the fact that the question is a

complex one, and that our conclusions may be only very tentative, we

have to consider as rationally as we conveniently can, first, some of

the drawbacks or defects of the present marriage customs, and secondly

such improvements in these as may seem feasible.

And with regard to the former, one of the most important points—which we

have already touched on—is the extraordinary absence of any allusion to

these subjects in the teaching of young folk. In a day when every

possible study seems to be crammed into the school curriculum, it is

curious that the one matter which is of supreme importance to the

individual and the community is most carefully ignored. That one ought

to be able to distinguish a passing sex-spell from a true comradeship

and devotion is no doubt a very sapient remark; but since it is a thing

which mature folk often fail to do, how young things with no experience

of their own or hint from others should be expected to do it is not easy

to understand. The search for a fitting mate, especially among the more

sensitive and highly-organized types of mankind, is a very complex

affair; and it is really monstrous that the girl or youth should have to

set out—as they mostly have to do to-day—on this difficult quest without

a word of help as to the choice of the way or the very real doubts and

perplexities that beset it.

Love's Coming-of-Age: A series of papers on the relations of the sexes · 第 3 / 9 段