CHAPTER XVIII

THE NEW MINISTRY OF MUNITIONS

“Now all the youth of England is on fire,

And silken dalliance in the wardrobe lies;

Now thrive the armourers, and honour’s thought

Reigns solely in the breast of every man.”

_Henry V_, Prologue to Act II.

THE little group of men whom Mr. Lloyd George assembled round him at No.

6, Whitehall Gardens, during the Whit-week of 1915, certainly seemed to

have no easy task before them. A new Ministry had been founded, and a

Bill to define its functions was being drawn up. But the Ministry

possessed neither buildings nor staff, neither furniture nor office

paper. It stepped forth into the world bare as a new-born babe.[90]

Even when its functions had been defined by Act of Parliament there

always hung about this enterprise an atmosphere of indefinable

adventure. Its relations to other Departments, and especially to the War

Office, were never precisely defined. It was always the parvenu of

Ministries. Throughout the crises of 1915 and 1916 it carried with it

the spirit of Esau, its hand against every man and every man’s hand

against it.

After all, that was precisely the kind of office for which Mr. Lloyd

George was best fitted. He was ever impatient of precedents; here was a

case where he had to make his own precedents. He always loved

trespassing. Here was an office where every movement was practically a

raid on the ground sacred to some other Department.

He was never in the least troubled by the restrictions of the situation.

He soon found out one vital fact—that our supply of shells had sunk to

75,000. But he rapidly grasped that there were many other things

required for success besides shells. There were, for instance, guns to

fire them from—big guns such as were entirely lacking at that time. In

June of 1915, finding that he still could obtain no sure or certain idea

of what was needed at the front, he travelled to Boulogne, and met a

little party of officers, many of them French, in a small café. The

party consisted partly of Generals, and partly of regimental officers.

He listened to all; for he wanted to know what was wanted in the

firing-line as much as what was thought to be wanted at Headquarters. He

closely questioned the French artillerists as to the number of guns they

were using. General Du Cane[91] was there from our Headquarters’ Staff;

and he brought with him a full report of what guns were required

according to their views.

Mr. Lloyd George began to realise that the need for big guns was the

centre of the situation.

After his cross-examination was over, Mr. Lloyd George turned to General

Du Cane:

“Don’t you think you had better go back and revise your estimates?”

General Du Cane promptly agreed—he had himself been converted. He went

back to Headquarters.

At midday there was a break in these urgent talks. M. Albert Thomas

suggested that in the afternoon they ought to have a formal meeting to

go into the whole subject.

“I am sorry,” said Mr. Lloyd George, “but I must get back to England.”

“Go back already?”

“Yes, already—there is not a moment to be lost. These big guns must be

ordered.”

He went back. A revived estimate of the munition requirements in France

was sent to Whitehall. Mr. Lloyd George increased that estimate. He sent

it across to Lord Kitchener. The great man, willing but doubtful of our

resources, sent it back with a comment: “That will take three

years.”[92]

Mr. Lloyd George then called together all the heads of the armament

firms. He laid the scheme before them. They viewed it with grave doubts.

They produced laborious estimates—discussed—consulted their chiefs.

Mr. Lloyd George put aside all the papers.

“Gentlemen,” he said, “this has to be done if the country is to be

saved. You will do it!”

There was nothing more to be said. They went away to do it; and they did

it.

The high officials responsible for financial control were a little

disturbed at his way of conducting business. Later on, yet more guns

were ordered, and official protests from other Departments were carried

up to the highest quarters. But before a decision could be reached the

orders had been given out, and the great guns—the guns that saved

France and England—were on the way.[93]

That was characteristic of his way of using the new machinery of the new

Ministry.

How this new Department of State was gradually built up; how picked men

from all over the country, and from the Civil Service, were gathered to

the side of the new Minister; how buildings were secured from day to day

for the work of administration; how excessive hours were worked and

excessive risks were run by old as well as young, and women as well as

men,—this story has already been largely told in the Parliamentary

statements of the Munition Ministers,[94] and it is one of the most

romantic and thrilling chapters in the history of the war.

There are one or two features in the history of this movement which

especially illustrate the characteristics of Mr. Lloyd George and his

power of appeal to the public.

The first of these was the rally of the business men of England in

response to his call. The British commercial classes were not, in the

period before the war, particularly attached to Mr. Lloyd George. They

had some “bones to pick” with him. But it must be said, to their eternal

credit, that when they realised the need of their country the old

hatchet was at once put underground. They came in hundreds to help him.

Many of them came without price, leaving their own factories and

workshops, putting aside their chance of personal profit, and content to

live on such salaries as their business could afford them. It is true

that many of them have risen to high honour in this service. It is well

that it should be so.

Happily there is sufficient soul of good in things to justify sacrifice

and even to reward it. It is no ill thing that many of these men have

risen to high honour and blazoned their names on the roll of England’s

noblest servants.

But it was not only the commercial men that came forward voluntarily to

answer the call. The Civil Servants also volunteered from all branches

of the Service to undertake increased responsibility without additional

gain. It was laid down from the beginning that none of those Civil

Servants who came into the Munition Service should receive extra pay for

extra work. Second division clerks raised to higher posts still

continued to receive the old salaries; so great was the eagerness to

save the country that men worked overtime without complaint, and there

were in those early days many men who came suspiciously near to working

night shifts as well as day.

It was precisely the combination of the best Civil Servants with the

best commercial men that gave to the Ministry of Munitions such a

marvellous touch of efficiency. Manufacturers coming up from the

provinces were now pleasantly surprised to find a new swiftness of

despatch in the conduct of their business. Every one brought into touch

with the Ministry of Munitions found a new spirit which seemed to give a

new hope for the government of this country. There was a certain thrill

about the most common affairs within those walls. Every servant of the

Ministry, down to the very boys and girls who carried the messages,

seemed to feel that they were called to a high task for a great end. It

was in this spirit that this great effort was undertaken and sustained

throughout the years that followed. At the same time the country as a

whole found itself provided at last with a capable machinery for using

its services. Not only was the centre quickened and sharpened to new

uses, but the whole of the United Kingdom was mapped out and in every

district there sat a Committee who formed a careful estimate of the

resources of that area.[95]

On the basis of that estimate there now began to grow up, as if by

magic, that vast network of new war factories which saved the armies in

France. The factories grew up chiefly near the iron and coal which

provided the raw material of munitions and handy to the great supplies

of skilled labour.[96]

But no adjustment could avoid a great upheaval of social life. For it

was part of this great change that a vast mass of labour must be

transferred from the industries of peace to the industries of war.

It was also part of the great stress of this crisis that the State must

be sure of its labour and that it must be able to draw from that labour

the utmost power of effort, sustained and continued through a prolonged

period of time.

Here lay the necessity for a new War Labour policy, difficult and

delicate to justify and administer, but indispensable for the safety of

the country.

It was clearly impossible to guarantee the adequate war output of this

vast aggregate of factories and workshops on the basis of the old peace

conditions—with an uncertain supply of skilled labour shifting about

from shop to shop along the ordinary channels of demand and supply. The

habit of “stealing” labour by the offer of higher wages had already

grown to so high a point in the early days of the war that the Munitions

Committee had had to issue an order under the Defence of the Realm Act

making it an offence to “entice.”[97] Thus the peace freedom of movement

had already been suspended. But now it was necessary to carry the

restrictions further and to guarantee to the nation at war a hold on its

workmen similar in kind, though not in degree, to the hold on its

soldiers.

Mr. Lloyd George characteristically wished to make the bold appeal, and

to say to the workmen: “Submit to the same discipline as your sons in

the trenches. Place yourselves under the same law, with this only

difference—that you are better-paid men.”[98] But this proposal, when

laid before the leaders of the Trade Unions, met with fierce opposition.

The “conscription of labour,” as it was called, was denounced as a “new

slavery.” Some degree of national consent to such a measure was plainly

necessary. So that proposal was dropped, and the Ministry of Munitions

set out to search for a new policy.

The policy finally agreed upon took shape in the first Munitions Act and

the subsequent amending measures. Round those measures a great strife

afterwards arose, and it may be worth while to say something as to their

origin and justification.

It was absolutely necessary, if the armies were to be properly supplied

with the immense mass of munitions required, that the workers should

both consent to the limitation of their freedom of movement and should

also suspend a number of those limitations and conditions of toil which

had been won in the course of the long conflict between Capital and

Labour.

It was desirable to come to a bargain; and with that view the Trade

Unions were consulted at every point. If the Government must trust

Labour, Labour must also trust the Government. Labour must have

assurance that a temporary suspension of conditions should not prejudice

the position in time of peace. That assurance had been already given,

and was now formally embodied in the Munitions Act.[99]

On these broad lines had grown up this Concordat, which, with all its

frictions and inevitable misunderstandings, still carried the country

through the moments of gravest peril. The liberty of Labour was gravely

restricted; but the great and sufficient reward for such a sacrifice to

every patriotic workman always was the knowledge that brave lives were

being saved and brave hearts sustained at the front. Another important

thing was that the country was being saved also.

Certainly the restrictions were very formidable. No workman or workwoman

could leave their employment in the war factory without a special

“leaving certificate.” All rules or customs restricting labour were

suspended; no strikes were allowed; and all questions of wages and hours

were to be settled by compulsory arbitration. To administer these rules

Munition Tribunals were set up in every district; and they had powers of

inflicting heavy fines. Such provisions must depend largely on the good

faith and good-will of employers; and there must always be some who will

not “play the game.” Hence the chronic movements of revolt—the rise of

the shop stewards, the engineers’ strike, the war-weariness of so many

industrial districts in the summer of 1917.

In the autumn of 1917 Mr. Winston Churchill, the new Minister of

Munitions, found it possible to suspend the leaving certificate and to

slacken some of these conditions. But there could be no doubt as to

their necessity up to that time.

The sole and sufficient excuse for these grave restrictions of liberty

was always the war, and the war alone. War is a terrible master; and

wherever he raises his head, few escape his tyranny. All that can be

said is that, with all their troubles, the sufferings of the men in the

workshops were as grains in the balance against the sufferings of the

men in the trenches.

But, even so, the work of the men alone was not enough to meet the need.

Other sources of labour must be tapped. It was now necessary to call in

the women to the aid of the men.

Mr. Lloyd George ventured on a bold appeal. He asked the women to come

from their pleasures and their comforts; he asked them to save the lives

of their brothers, their sweethearts, and their husbands. They came in

multitudes. They filled the ranks, and they filled the shells.[100] They

silenced their sourest critics, even in their own sex. They worked by

day and they worked by night. They earned for themselves a new position

in the State. They showed that women could be patriots themselves, as

well as the wives and mothers of patriots. Not easily will England

forget those splendid women of 1915-18.

As for Mr. Lloyd George himself, he worked as hard as any one in the

ranks of this new Labour Army. He was here, there, and everywhere. All

through the summer of 1915 he travelled over the country, appealing,

stimulating, and even when necessary rebuking. He visited all the

industrial centres. He spoke straight to the English working classes;

and it was only their worst friends who resented his honesty. He told

them to suspend their peace weaknesses in this supreme hour; and he told

them, as John Stuart Mill told them once before, where their chief

weakness lay. He set up a Drink Control Board, as well as Munition

Tribunals; and all that was best and most loyal among the artisans

acquiesced. _Ça ira_; the plan worked; the machine began to do its duty.

Nothing was left undone. To fill up the ranks, unskilled men were

trained to do the work of skilled. The Board of Trade organised a

special army of Munition Volunteers. In the autumn of 1915 there was a

great effort, in conjunction with the War Office, to bring back from the

front some thousands[101] of those numerous munition workers,

iron-workers, and miners who had been allowed to recruit in the first

fine flush of the recruiting enthusiasm in 1914.

Mr. Lloyd George gave his whole mind to this one question—the making of

war material. He had, as we have seen, found the Army with only 75,000

shells in hand in June, 1915; when he left the Ministry in June, 1916,

he had provided shells in millions. He himself mastered the technique of

shell-making and gun-making; he visited the factories and studied the

machinery; he listened to every complaint from the soldiers at the

front; he investigated every defect.

The real secret, indeed, of his work was that he kept in touch with the

armies at the Western Front, constantly visiting them, studying their

needs on the spot, listening to the actual fighting men. Above all he

studied the German inventions. After a short while, thanks to the

labours of our young scientists from the Universities, he was able to

provide our soldiers with gas-masks that enabled them to face unshaken

the worst deviltry of the enemy, and with gas that was a fit reply to

theirs. He provided our men with flame-throwers which made them a fair

match when they faced the flame-throwers of the Teuton.

I remember his taking me, one day in 1915, to see his little collection

of these horrible devices in the basement of the old Metropole Hotel. He

showed me the model shells, mounting by slow gradations to a giant’s

height. He lingered halfway along this row of shells. He put his hand on

one. “When I started the Ministry,” he said, “our shells went only as

high as this. The German shells went to the top of the range. Was that

fair to our soldiers?” It was a vivid illustration of what they were

achieving.

So this gigantic new organisation was built up, and gradually brought

its full weight into the struggle. Its functions were constantly

enlarging. By proved fitness to rule over one city this new Ministry

soon achieved the right to rule over ten. From supplying it took to

making, from making it took to designing, and to designing after its own

ideas. The great net-work of its new factories gradually spread over the

land. Greatly daring, it built; it housed; it fed. From a servant it

became a master. In August, 1915, it took over from the War Office the

Royal Factory at Woolwich; and so it became the supreme war-maker of the

nation.

Meanwhile, the soldiers at the front grew more confident and serene.

They felt the support of the great working nation behind them. They grew

more confident of supremacy. They knew that even the women-kind were

“doing their bit.” In each great battle, as the shells swept over their

heads, they felt a new power at work in their favour.[102] They “went

over the top” with the knowledge that the mailed fist of Prussia was to

be met with the iron hammer of England.

To this new feeling and the confidence born of it we may largely

attribute the great victories of the Somme, the storming of the Vimy

Ridge, and the smashing onslaught on Messines.

Many Englishmen, great and small, have a right to share in the glory of

this great work. We must not forget those men who, before the great

central crisis arose, battled alone against a sea of errors and failings

in high places—great civil servants like Sir Hubert Llewellyn Smith, or

great public servants like Lord Moulton. Such men do not labour in the

limelight. We must remember their services.

Nor must we forget loyal political helpers like Dr. Addison, Mr. Lloyd

George’s first lieutenant at the Ministry, and Mr. Montagu, his

successor.

But, when all is said and done, the man who did the deed was Mr. Lloyd

George. Without his resolution and decision England would have fared

badly in that dark hour. It was he who designed, directed, and completed

this noble and stupendous endeavour. It was he who carried it through.

It was he who, when others failed, armed and strengthened our armies. It

is scarcely too much to say that it was he who, under Providence, saved

England.

-----

[90] See Dr. Addison’s description (House of Commons, June 28th, 1917):

“There was to be one aim, and one aim only—to obtain the goods and make

delivery of them to the Army. No other interests and no considerations

of leisure were to be entertained.”

[91] Lieutenant-General Sir John Philip Du Cane, Major-General R.A.,

G.H.Q., 1915. Afterwards British representative with Marshal Foch.

[92] Similarly, to Lord French he said eight years (_Journal_ interview,

Sept. 1917).

[93] Mr. Montagu, in the House of Commons, on August 16th, 1916, said

openly that “Mr. Lloyd George ordered far more guns than were thought by

the War Office to be necessary, and yet received new requirements

showing that he had not ordered enough.”

[94] Mr. Lloyd George’s statement of December 21st, 1915, Mr. Montagu’s

statement of August 16th, 1916, and Dr. Addison’s statement of June

28th, 1917.

[95] Twelve areas: England and Wales, 8; Scotland, 2; Ireland, 2; 40

local Munition Committees in the engineering centres consisting of local

business men. (Mr. Lloyd George, December 21st, 1915.)

[96] Within a year the labour employed on munitions had gone up from

1,635,000 to 2,250,000, and there were 32 national shell factories, 12

for projectiles, 6 for cartridges, etc. (Mr. Montagu, August 1915.)

[97] There had also been in March an agreement between the Government

and the Trade Unions called the Treasury Agreement, and administered by

a Labour Advisory Committee. The general line of that agreement was an

understanding to suspend restrictive Trade Union practices in return for

a promise to tax excess profits.

[98] He put this appeal very strongly in a speech to the engineers at

Cardiff on June 11th, 1915.

[99] Clause 20 of the main Act: “This Act shall have effect only so long

as the Office of Minister of Munitions and the Ministry of Munitions

exist.”

[100] At Woolwich alone the number of women workers rose from 125 to

25,000.

[101] 40,000 soldiers were brought back. In addition, there are 38,000

War Munition Volunteers, and 30,000 Army Reserve Munition Workers. (Dr.

Addison’s speech.)

[102] By August 1916 the high-explosive shells had been increased by 66

per cent.; there had been a 14-fold increase of machine-guns; and a

33-fold increase of bombs. Every month saw as many great guns

manufactured as existed at the beginning of the war. (Mr. Montagu,

August 1916.)

The Prime Minister(#60179) · 第 18 / 27 章