CHAPTER XII

A GERMAN TOUR

“In small, truckling States, a timely compromise with power has

often been the means, and the only means, of drawling out their

puny existence: but a great State is too much envied, too much

dreaded to find safety in humiliation. To be secure, it must be

respected. Power, and eminence, and consideration, are things

not to be begged. They must be commanded.”—EDMUND BURKE,

_Letter I on A Regicide Peace_.

IN the late summer of 1908, at the end of the parliamentary session, Mr.

Lloyd George traversed Germany from west to east and from south to

north. It was a very thorough and systematic motor-tour. He was the

travelling guest of Mr. (now Sir) Charles Henry,[55] a Member of

Parliament of great public spirit and strong Liberal views, who invited

me also to accompany the party. It was a journey of profound interest

for us all. The object of the tour was to investigate the German system

of National Insurance. Parliament had just passed the Old Age Pensions

Act; and Mr. Lloyd George had already publicly promised to round off the

British pension system by a general scheme of national insurance. Before

drafting the actual Bills he wished to make a complete study of that

very comprehensive system which had been operating in Germany since

1893. The German Government gave us access to all their Central State

Insurance Offices, and gave us facilities for interviewing all their

leading Insurance civil servants. We visited most of the largest towns

of the German Empire, and had conversations with employers and

workmen—Socialists and trade unionists—as well as with officials.

Never was a statesman’s holiday spent in a more thorough investigation

of a great problem of the lives of the people.

We started the motor-tour in France. We trained to Amiens, where the

motor met us, and travelled on the great northern French national roads

through the very region where so much of the fighting has taken place

during the last three years—through Compiègne, Soissons, along the

valley of the Aisne to Rheims, where we visited the Cathedral—that

great masterpiece of Gothic architecture which has since suffered such

sacrilegious injury. Thence we travelled south by Châlons-sur-Marne,

following the river valley by Vitry and Bar-le-Duc. We crossed the Meuse

and passed through Nancy, that most lovely of valley frontier towns,

which has since so bravely borne such fierce enemy attacks. Nancy looked

very peaceful on that August day when we passed through her pretty

streets and pressed on towards the Vosges Mountains, hoping to reach

Strassburg that evening.

At that point we made a happy miscalculation in our time; and we were

benighted in a little French village just on the edge of the frontier at

the very summit of the Vosges. We found that we could get supper and

beds at one of those clean little _auberges_ which are scarcely ever

lacking in the smallest French village. As we supped on the excellent

meal of _bouillon_ and cutlets improvised by the ready hostess, she

stood and talked to us. She spoke to us of the memories of 1870-71, when

the tide of war had so swiftly passed by that little village. She was a

school-child at that time, and she had missed two years of her

schooling. For the Germans had remained in occupation of that part of

the country on the Vosges frontier for fully a year after the end of the

war. The withdrawal of the army took place, Department by Department, as

the indemnity was paid; and this Department was the last to be

evacuated. Before the war she was living well within France; at the end

she found herself on the edge of the new frontier.

We asked her how she managed to make an inn pay at such a spot. “Oh,

quite easily,” she said. “We are kept going by the people of French

birth who come up on Sundays from Alsace!” “Why?” “Oh, just to feel the

joy of living for a day on French soil!”

Next day we motored down to Strassburg, climbed the towers, and saw the

marks of the German shells fired nearly forty years before, and spent a

pleasant afternoon in the picturesque streets of that ancient town. As

far as man could do it Alsace had been painted black, white and red with

Teuton colours. Nowhere in the streets of Strassburg did we observe any

sign or notice in any language but German. Everywhere were German

soldiers, and in the evening we attended a concert of massed German

bands at which the music was purely Teuton, and Teuton of the most

patriotic kind. But the people seemed to us to listen with a certain

strange dull indifference to all this brazen wooing; and beneath the

surface we seemed to hear the whisper of a coming storm. Next day,

motoring across the country, we had occasion to ask the way from an

Alsatian peasant. The question was asked in German, but one of the party

slipped in with French. The peasant’s face instantly lighted up. “Ah! do

the gentlemen speak in French?” he said. “Ah! I prefer to speak in that

language myself.” So little had all the arts of suppression succeeded in

crushing the spirit of that race.

At Stuttgart we were witnesses of a strange event, which comes now back

to memory with a significance which was then hidden. Count Zeppelin was

then experimenting with his airships, and one of those new miracles had

been advertised to start on a voyage from a spot near Stuttgart. The

whole town had flooded out in a vast multitude to see the airship make a

start; but at the critical moment there arose a hurricane of wind. The

ship was torn from its moorings and fell in utter wreckage and confusion

in the midst of the crowd. We arrived on the scene just after this had

happened, and met the people returning from witnessing the disaster.

What was notable about that multitude was the passion of grief which at

that moment was sweeping over them. It was as if they had all suffered

some acute personal loss. Men and women were gesticulating, some were

almost weeping; all their faces were troubled and perplexed. As the

people coming from the city met those returning we could hear

exclamations of sorrow and almost of anguish. “Ah!” they cried, “is the

airship down? What a horrible calamity!” We heard afterwards that the

crowd surrounding the airship had just sung that famous national hymn,

“Deutschland über alles.” They had been worked up to ecstasy when the

airship crashed.

So we motored through that land in that happy peace time, little

foreboding all the great calamities that were to break from that

storm-centre on to an unsuspecting world.

Bethmann-Hollweg was at that time “Home Secretary,” a vigorous, amiable

Minister of the official kind, sincerely keen on social reforms; a

Junker of the better type. He treated Mr. Lloyd George with great

courtesy. He returned from his holiday, and specially entertained him

and his party in the famous restaurant at the Zoological Gardens at

Berlin. He invited many eminent members of the German Civil Service to

meet us. Every one was very gracious and polite—almost too polite for

comfort. After dinner we went into a large reception-room, and there we

remained standing all the evening talking and looking at one another.

Towards the end of the evening we began to feel very fatigued. I

ventured to ask one of the German officials whether it would be the

correct thing to sit down. “Oh!” he said. “We have all been waiting for

you to sit down! We, too, are very tired!”

In the middle of this rivalry in fatigue, they brought round great

glasses of foaming beer in Prussian fashion. Mr. Lloyd George, who is

almost a teetotaler, looked at the glasses with a scared expression.

Then suddenly his face grew resolute. “We must show that Great Britain

is not to be left behind!”

Bethmann-Hollweg did not talk politics until towards the end of dinner.

The conversation drifted to King Edward’s visit to the Russian Czar at

Réval. That visit had caused a great ferment in Germany, and grave

suspicions of British intentions. Bethmann-Hollweg voiced those

suspicions in the frankest manner. “You are trying to encircle us!” he

cried to Mr. Lloyd George. “You and France and Russia are attempting to

strangle us!”

Mr. Lloyd George assured him of the friendliness of Great Britain

towards all the great Powers; but for the moment he refused to be

appeased. He thumped the table with his hand. “The Prussian Government

has only to lift a finger,” he cried, “and every living Prussian will

die for the Fatherland!”

Mr. Lloyd George listened to all this with his characteristic calmness

and good-humour. “But what about the other Germans?” he put in at this

point.

A shadow passed over the face of the Prussian Minister.

“Oh! they?” he said with a gesture. “They, too, will come along!”

But this was only a flash. On the whole, Bethmann-Hollweg was very

friendly; and the facts of his family life showed him Anglophile. He had

sent his son to an English University; and admiration for English

education was, curiously enough, just at that moment almost as much a

fashion in Germany as admiration for German education in England. When

we were lunching with a judge at Frankfort Mr. Lloyd George discovered

that the daughter of the house had actually been at school along with

his own daughter at the famous English girls’ school near

Brighton—Roedean.

Of course, it is always foolish to imagine that social courtesies

seriously affect the grave pursuit of national interests in any country.

But they produce a friendly atmosphere; and he would be a criminal who,

with all the causes of difference and conflict in the world, did not

always try to improve the human atmosphere.

The people of Hamburg were remarkably friendly to us. The merchants

trading with England gave us an especially enthusiastic reception. They

feasted us at a banquet at which sat the Hamburg Prussian Minister—for

Berlin keeps a Ministry in the “Free Towns” as a last relic of their

former independence.

It was on the occasion of that banquet that Mr. Lloyd George threw out

the idea of regulating armaments by a Plimsoll “Load-line” fixed

according to population. It is strange to-day to remember with what

enthusiasm that suggestion was received by the Hamburg merchants.

The authorities of Hamburg provided a launch to take us into every

corner of their famous port, so as to show us all the power and pride of

their new creation—with all its marvellous up-to-date devices for

handling ships and cargoes, its wonderful new docks and elevators, its

ingenious and multifarious resources for expediting sea-traffic. It was

good to see that port; if only to realise the wisdom of the King’s

advice to us at home—“Wake up, Britain!”

It is difficult to exaggerate the part played by the personality of the

Kaiser in German imperial politics at that moment. If one probed any

great German question to the bottom, one always came back to that fact.

Take the question of the Navy—that vital Anglo-German problem of the

early century. The Army chiefs were, I think, quite ready to contemplate

a naval “deal,” if only to keep England out of the land-wars of the

Continent. The Social Democrats, of course, were more than willing; they

were anti-naval as well as anti-militarist. But to the Kaiser the Navy

was always prime favourite; it was his toy, his darling dream, his

cherished ambition. His sincerest belief and hopes were expressed in the

phrase, “Our future lies on the ocean.” He stimulated the popular zeal

for the Navy in every possible way. The Nord Deutsche Lloyd Liners had

elaborate pictures comparing the respective navies, and showing the

smallness of the German in comparison with ours; the great German Navy

League was constantly pushed forward; and no Minister could long remain

in power who did not sympathise with this cult. The curious thing was

that the German populations along the sea-board were not half so

enthusiastic for the Navy as the inland populations, who seemed

enthusiastic in proportion to their ignorance of the sea.

Many Germans used to put down the Kaiser’s passion for the Navy to his

English blood. He was a very enthusiastic yachtsman; and, as most

yachtsmen are Englishmen, that threw him into constant relations of

intimacy with English sailor-men. The English yachtsmen on the North Sea

found him almost excessive in his friendliness. I remember an instance

given to me by a famous English yachtsman, fond of cruising in northern

waters. A German torpedo-boat had accidentally one evening broken the

bowsprit of his yacht. During the night, while the owner was asleep, a

body of carpenters came on board of the English yacht and mended the

bowsprit. In the morning, after breakfast, the Kaiser arrived himself.

He had sent the carpenters. “Well!” he said, “how do you like your new

bowsprit?” Then he looked at it whimsically. “When you go back to

England,” he said, “tell them it was ‘made in Germany’!”

And yet at that very time this friendliness towards English

yachtsmen—of which this was only one example—was not preventing the

Kaiser from regarding the British naval power with a haunting jealousy

that led him into the constant intrigues against England, of which we

gain a glimpse in the secret correspondence discovered in the palace of

the Russian Czar.

The Kaiser, indeed, was at that time always a great trouble to all the

diplomats. He was like a perpetual cracker explosively zig-zagging about

in all the Foreign Offices of Europe. Nobody ever knew what he would do

or say—to whom he would talk, and with whom he would correspond. He had

a touch of freakish irresponsibility. “I always knew that Willy would

come to no good,” sighed an English Princess of the old school; and she

seemed to have an eye for character. After Agadir, he calmly protested

that the British Government had no right to object, as he had told some

one of his intentions when he was visiting the British Court! His

telegram to President Wilson seems to show that he carried this view of

the British Constitution right up to the eve of the Great War.

“He is a bad neighbour,” said an official of the British Foreign Office

at that time; and that really seemed to sum it up.

His constant changes of mood made German foreign policy very difficult

to forecast, and I do not think that any one can claim to have foreseen

the future.

The German officials told me that they had never had a visitor with a

quicker mind than Mr. Lloyd George. After a long day spent in the

Central Insurance Office at Berlin, the men who went round with us were

very enthusiastic. “He grasps the system more rapidly than any student

we have ever had.” Mr. Lloyd George, indeed, made a very exhaustive

study of the German system. But in his Act he improved upon it and added

to it in many important respects.[56]

It was a strange visit, curious to look back upon at this distance of

time. Our days were filled with the insistent calls of a great social

inquiry. But we could not ignore another aspect. After all, there was a

greater problem darkening the air than insurance against individual

sickness and unemployment. What about insurance against another and

greater human sickness—the sickness of war? The thought of that kept

recurring, like a secondary theme in some piece of music.

The impressions gained during this tour (1908) partly account, no doubt,

for the firmness of Mr. Lloyd George’s language in that famous City

speech with which, after consultation with Sir Edward Grey, he faced the

German Agadir threat in 1911. He himself always contended at the time

that that speech saved Europe from war. A firm, clear, real attitude—an

attitude that would convince Germany that we meant what we said—that is

what he always in those days advocated. He argued that here was the most

positive realistic Power in the world—with no regard for sentimentalism

or even humanity where the interests of Germany were concerned. Very

well; let us treat them as they treated us. Let them know definitely

where we stood. Let our language to them be plain and frank. They would

respect us all the more for it.

He was very fiercely attacked for this speech by the pacifists at the

time, both in public and private. He made a characteristic reply to

their pin-pricks. “Perhaps it would have been better if I had not made

the speech! There would have been war, and the Prussian bully would have

got the thrashing he deserves!”

Then, as since, nothing irritated and angered him more than the attitude

of Germany to France. “It is simply persecution!” he used to say. “The

world cannot be carried on along these lines!”

So he had already a dim perception of the great issue which was so soon

to divide the world.

Between 1908 and 1914 came that “Turtle Dove” period (1912-1914) during

which Germany wooed us. Never had Germany been more friendly to Great

Britain than she was in the spring of that fatal year, 1914; never had

our relations been more smooth; never had her protestations of affection

been more numerous. The change from 1911 was almost startling.

Perhaps it ought to have startled us more. It is so easy to be sages

after the accomplished fact. But it is not often that the architects of

suspicion build wisely; their day comes once in a while, and they

rejoice exceedingly. It is, perhaps, the worst crime of Germany that she

has strengthened that sinister creed of doubt, and lowered faith between

man and man.

-----

[55] Died January, 1920.

[56] He raised the level of the sick benefit; he added several new

benefits; and he paid the doctors better.

The Prime Minister(#60179) · 第 12 / 27 章