THE DEPOSITION OF KING STEPHEN (1141).

=Source.=--William of Malmesbury, _Historia Novella_, ed. Stubbs, vol.

ii., p. 574. (Rolls Series.)

On the second day after the Octave of Easter (April 11) a council of

archbishop Theobald and all the bishops of England and many abbots was

opened with great ceremony at Winchester under the presidency of the

legate. Those who were not there sent reasons for their absence by

proctor or letter. The proceedings of this council I will set forth

for posterity with complete accuracy, since I was myself present, and

I remember the whole perfectly. On that day, after reading the letters

of excuse whereby some justified their absence, the legate summoned

the bishops apart and discussed with them his secret intention; and

afterwards the abbots, and last of all the archdeacons, were summoned.

Of his purpose nothing was made public, but the thoughts and speech of

all men were busy with what was likely to be done.

On the third day the legate spoke to this effect: that by the Pope’s

condescension he held his place in England, wherefore by his authority

the clergy of England had been assembled at this council, that they

might deliberate together touching the peace of the country, which

was in grave peril of shipwreck. In the time of king Henry, his

uncle, England had been a unique abode of peace, so that through the

activity, the spirit and the labour of that unrivalled prince, not

only the natives, whatsoever their might and rank, dared not make

trouble, but also by his example all neighbouring kings and princes

themselves yielded to peace and desired or forced their subjects to do

the like. The same king, some years before his death, had caused the

whole realm of England and the duchy of Normandy to be bound by the

oath of all bishops and barons alike to his daughter, sometime Empress,

his sole surviving child of his first wife, if he should fail of a

male successor by the wife he had married from Lorraine. “And cruel

fortune,” said he, “grudged him his desire, so that he died in Normandy

without heir male. So, because it seemed long to wait for the Lady,

who delayed her coming to England, for she was dwelling in Normandy,

the peace of the country was provided for, and my brother was suffered

to become king. Yet, though I pledged myself as surety between him

and God that he would honour and exalt Holy Church, and maintain good

laws and uproot evil, I grieve to remember, I am ashamed to recall,

what manner of king he has shown himself; how no justice has been done

on offenders, how peace was wholly destroyed almost within a year;

bishops seized and forced to surrender their possessions; abbeys sold,

churches plundered of their treasures; evil men’s counsel regarded,

and good men’s put aside or wholly despised. You know how often I

appealed to him, as well by myself as by the bishops, especially in the

council summoned last year for this purpose, and yet I won nothing but

disfavour. It can escape no man, who thinks aright, that I ought to

love my mortal brother, but much rather ought to regard the cause of my

immortal Father. Therefore, since God has judged my brother, permitting

him without my connivance to fall into the power of the mighty, in

my right as legate I have asked you all to assemble hither, that the

kingdom be not imperilled for lack of a ruler. Yesterday the matter was

discussed in secret before the greater part of the clergy of England,

whose right it is above all men to elect and ordain a prince. First,

then, as is justly due, calling God to our aid, we elect as lady of

England and Normandy, the daughter of the peaceful, the glorious, the

wealthy, the excellent king, incomparable in our times, and we promise

her fealty and maintenance.”

After all present had either suitably applauded his declaration or by

silence refrained from opposition, the legate added: “We have summoned

by messengers the men of London, who rank almost as nobles in England

through the greatness of the city, and have sent them safe conduct, and

I trust that they will not delay their arrival beyond to-day; let us

give them good grace until the morrow.”

On the fourth day came the men of London, and after being conducted

into the council, put their case so far as to say that they had been

sent by the commune of London not to raise strife but to pray for the

release of their lord the king from captivity; and that all the barons

who had long been admitted into their commune, earnestly demanded the

same of the lord legate and of the archbishop and all the clergy there

present. The legate answered them fully and clearly, and to prevent the

fulfilment of what they requested, repeated his speech of the previous

day, adding, however, that it did not become the men of London, who

were esteemed in England as nobles, to support the cause of those who

had abandoned their lord in battle, by whose counsel he had dishonoured

Holy Church, and finally who appeared to show favour to the men of

London solely in order to drain them of their money.... They took

counsel together and said that they would report the decree of the

council to their fellows, and give it their countenance so far as they

could.

On the fifth day the council broke up after the excommunication of

many of the royal party, in particular, William Martel, formerly king

Henry’s butler, and afterwards sewer[40] to king Stephen; he had

grossly exasperated the legate by intercepting and pilfering much of

his property.

It was a heavy task, however, to win over the goodwill of the

men of London, for though these events took place, as I have said,

immediately after Easter, it was only a few days before Midsummer that

they consented to receive the empress. By that time the greater part

of England had duly accepted her governance.... But at the very moment

when she thought to secure possession of the whole of England, all was

changed. The men of London, always mistrusted, and murmuring among

themselves, now burst out into expressions of open hatred, and even,

it is said, lay in wait for the Lady and her earls. They had warning

and escaped, and left the city gradually without rioting and with a

kind of knightly discipline. The empress was accompanied by the legate

and David king of Scotland, her uncle, and her brother Robert, then as

always, in all things, the partner of his sister’s fortunes, and, in

short, all of her party escaped to a man. The men of London, learning

of their departure, flew to their houses and plundered everything which

they had left behind in their haste.

The Normans in England (1066-1154) · 第 102 / 111 题