THE ACCESSION OF STEPHEN (1135).

=Source.=--_Gesta Stephani_, ed. Howlett, vol. iii., p. 3. (Rolls

Series, Chronicles of Stephen, Henry II., and Richard I.)

When king Henry, giver of peace to his country and father of his

people, passed away in death, the unhappy event threw the whole country

into anarchy and total confusion. The land, which during his reign had

been the seat of justice and the home of law, became on his decease

a sink of iniquity and a hotbed of all malice. England, formerly the

abode of right, the habitation of peace, the throne of piety, the

mirror of religion, became the dwelling-place of perversity, the refuge

of discord, the school of disorder, and the mistress of all rebellion.

The reverend bonds of sacred friendship were straightway broken among

the people, the most intimate ties of mutual kinship were loosed, and

those who had worn the garments of daily tranquillity were whelmed by

the noise of battle and the madness of war. For every man was seized

with a new passion for barbarity, to run riot against his neighbour,

and to reckon his glory by the measure of his wrongs to the innocent.

The established laws, that restrain an undisciplined people, were

wholly neglected, nay rather annulled, and men straightway accomplished

any crime which their unlawful passions inspired. To use the words of

the prophet, “There was no soundness from the sole of the foot to the

crown of the head,” for from the lowest to the highest their minds were

sick, and either they wrought havoc or assented to the havoc which

others wrought. Even the wild beasts, which were aforetime peaceably

preserved in every district, as though confined by enclosures, were

everywhere loosed and hunted by all and slain by all indiscriminately

and without fear. This, indeed, was a lesser evil, and a matter of

small complaint; none the less it was amazing how so many thousands

of beasts, that before had covered the whole country in thronging

herds, were now suddenly annihilated, so that out of so vast a number

you would scarcely discover two together. When at length this great

and indescribable plenty began so to decline that, as men say, a bird

was a rarity and scarce a stag could anywhere be seen, folk turned

their violence against each other and robbed their neighbours, each

plundering each in turn, and plotting ambush and destruction for each

other, as the prophet said, “Man rose up without mercy against man, and

everyone was set against his neighbour.” Whatever crime was suggested

by passion in times of peace, was now swiftly brought to an issue, when

vengeance might seize its opportunity; dissembled hatred and hidden

malice burst forth to light and was openly avowed.

While the English were indulging in this disastrous anarchy,

breaking the restraints of justice and freely rioting in all sorts

of wickedness, Stephen, count of Boulogne, a man of illustrious and

noble lineage, landed in England with a few followers. King Henry, the

peacemaker, loved him above all his nephews, not only because of his

close tie of kinship, but for the manifold excellencies that specially

distinguished and adorned him. What is rare indeed in our times, he

combined riches with modesty, generosity with courtesy; yet in all

military encounters and any siege of his enemies, he was daring and

courageous, cautious and persistent. Being the man he was, as soon as

rumours of king Henry’s death reached him, he conceived a bold design

in his heart, like Saul, and since he was beyond seas, hurried to the

coast, and obtaining by good fortune a favourable breeze, steered for

England on which his thoughts were set. Landing, as said before, with a

very small following, he hastened to London, the metropolis and queen

of the whole country. Stirred by his coming, the whole city came out to

meet him with a noisy welcome, dancing with joy and festivity to have

recovered in Stephen another Henry, the loss of whose guardianship they

were but now deploring. So the elder and more prominent men summoned

a council, and making common provision, in their judgment, for the

good estate of the realm, unanimously conspired to elect him king.

They urged that the whole realm was liable to the chances of evil

fortune, where the fount of all governance and the head of justice was

lacking. It was vital to them at once to establish a king, who should

restore peace for the common good, punish rebels by force of arms, and

justly administer the laws. Moreover it was their right, their special

privilege, on the death of their king, themselves to set his successor

on the throne. There was no other at hand to fulfil a king’s part and

put an end to the perils of the realm, save only Stephen, who, it

seemed, had been brought to them by the will of Heaven; he was worthy

of the dignity in the eyes of all, as well by the distinction of his

birth as by the excellence of his character. These points were heard

and welcomed by all without open contradiction, and by common counsel

they decided to offer him the throne and to appoint him king with their

unanimous support, both parties covenanting by a treaty confirmed,

it is said, by mutual oaths, that the citizens on the one hand would

support him with their wealth and maintain him with their strength

during his life, and that he, on the other hand, should devote all his

energies to the pacification of the realm for the benefit of them all.

The Normans in England (1066-1154) · 第 93 / 111 题