FORESTS AND THE ROYAL LOVE OF HUNTING.

=Source.=--Richard, son of Nigel, _Dialogus de Scaccario_, ed. Hughes,

Crump, and Johnson, p. 105.

_Master._ Forest procedure and the penalties or pardons of

transgressors in forests, whether pecuniary or corporal, are kept apart

from the other judgments of the realm and reserved for the decision of

the king alone or of one of his intimate ministers specially deputed

hereto. It subsists by its own laws, which are said to rest not upon

the common law of the realm but on the personal will of the kings,

so that anything that is done by forest-law is said to be not just

absolutely, but just according to forest-law. The forests, moreover,

are the kings’ sanctuaries and their highest delight, for to them they

come to hunt when they lay aside the cares of state for a while, that

they may be refreshed by a brief rest. There they put off at once their

burdens and the inevitable turmoil of the court, and breathe for a

space the blessed air of natural freedom; wherefore it follows that

transgressors therein are subject only to the royal displeasure....

_Disciple._ ... Tell me at once what is a forest?...

_M._ The king’s forest is the safe abode of wild beasts, not of any

species, but of woodland beasts, not in any kind of place, but in fixed

and suitable places....

_D._ Is there a king’s forest in every county?

_M._ No, only in the wooded ones, which furnish the beasts with

coverts and the richest feeding grounds; and it matters not who is the

possessor of the woods, the king himself or the chief men of the realm,

everywhere the beasts can range freely and unharmed.

The Normans in England (1066-1154) · 第 68 / 111 题