WAS SHAKSPEARE DESCENDED FROM A LANDED PROPRIETOR?

(Vol. ix., p. 75.)

I am inclined to think that MR. HALLIWELL has been misled by his old

law-books, for upon looking at the principal authorities upon this point, I

cannot find any such interpretation of the term _inheritance_ as that

quoted by him from Cowell. The words "the inheritance," in the passage

"heretofore the inheritance of William Shakspeare, Gent., deceased," would

most certainly appear to imply that Shakspeare inherited the lands as

heir-at-law to some one. But, however, it must not be concluded upon this

alone that the poet's father was a landed proprietor, as the inheritance

could proceed from any other ancestor to whom Shakspeare was by law heir.

Blackstone, in his _Commentaries_, has the following:

"Descent, or hereditary succession, is the title whereby a man on the

death of his ancestor acquires his estate by right of representation,

as his heir-at-law. An heir, therefore, is he upon whom the law casts

the estate immediately on the death of the ancestor: and an estate, so

descending to the heirs, is in Law called _the inheritance_."--Vol. ii.

p. 201.

{155} Again:

"Purchase, _perquisitio_, taken in its largest and most extensive

sense, is thus defined by Littleton; the possession of lands and

tenements which a man hath by his own act or agreement, and not by

descent from any of his ancestors or kindred. In this sense it is

contra-distinguished from acquisition by right of blood, and includes

every other method of coming to an estate, _but merely that by

inheritance_: wherein the title is vested in a person, not by his own

act or agreement, but by the single operation of law."--Vol. ii. p.

241.

Thus it is clear the possession of an estate by inheritance is created only

by a person being heir to it; and the mere purchase of it, though it vests

the fee simple in him, can but make him the _assign_ and not the _heir_.

The nomination (as it would be in the case of a purchase) of an heir to

succeed to the inheritance, has no place in the English law; the maxim

being "Solus Deus hæredem facere potest, non homo;" and all other persons,

whom a tenant in fee simple may please to appoint as his successors, are

not his heirs but his assigns. (See _Williams on the Law of Real

Property_.)

Notes and Queries, Number 225, February 18, 1854 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 95 / 153 题