PART I

E-text prepared by Thierry Alberto, Henry Craig, Christine P. Travers, and

the Project Gutenberg Online Distributed Proofreading Team

(http://www.pgdp.net)

Transcriber's note:

Obvious printer's errors have been corrected; all other

inconsistencies are as in the original. The author's spelling

has been retained.

Page numbers have been retained as {p.xxx}.

Page 96: The "u" in "Cadil gu lo" has a breve in the original.

Page 218: The marker for footnote 88 could not be found in the

text.

MEMOIRS OF THE LIFE

OF

SIR WALTER SCOTT

BART.

by

JOHN GIBSON LOCKHART

In Ten Volumes

VOLUME V

Boston and New York

Houghton, Mifflin and Company

The Riverside Press, Cambridge

MCMI

Copyright, 1901

by Houghton, Mifflin and Company

All Rights Reserved

Six Hundred Copies Printed

Number,

{p.v} TABLE OF CONTENTS

Chap. Page

XXXIV. Progress of The Lord of the Isles. -- Correspondence

with Mr. Joseph Train. -- Rapid completion of The Lord of

the Isles. -- "Refreshing the Machine." -- "Six Weeks at a

Christmas." -- Publication of the Poem, -- and of Guy

Mannering. -- Letters to Morritt, Terry, and John

Ballantyne. -- Anecdotes by James Ballantyne. -- Visit to

London. -- Meeting with Lord Byron. -- Dinners at Carlton

House. 1814-1815. 1

XXXV. Battle of Waterloo -- Letter of Sir Charles Bell. --

Visit to the Continent. -- Waterloo. -- Letters from

Brussels and Paris. -- Anecdotes of Scott at Paris. -- The

Duke of Wellington. -- The Emperor Alexander. -- Blücher. --

Platoff -- Party at Ermenonville, etc. -- London. -- Parting

with Lord Byron. -- Scott's Sheffield Knife. -- Return to

Abbotsford. -- Anecdotes by Mr. Skene and James Ballantyne.

1815. 39

XXXVI. Field of Waterloo published. -- Revision of Paul's

Letters, etc. -- Quarrel and Reconciliation with Hogg. --

Football Match at Carterhaugh. -- Songs on the Banner of

Buccleuch. -- Dinner at Bowhill. -- Design for a Piece of

Plate to the Sutors of Selkirk. -- Letters to the Duke of

Buccleuch, Joanna Baillie, and Mr. Morritt. 1815. 76

XXXVII. {p.vi} Publication of Paul's Letters to his

Kinsfolk. -- Guy Mannering "Terry-fied." -- Death of Major

John Scott. -- Letters to Thomas Scott. -- Publication of

The Antiquary. -- History of 1814 for the Edinburgh Annual

Register. -- Letters on the History of Scotland projected.

-- Publication of the First Tales of my Landlord by Murray

and Blackwood. -- Anecdotes by Mr. Train. -- Quarterly

Review on the Tales. -- Building at Abbotsford begun. --

Letters to Morritt, Terry, Murray, and the Ballantynes.

1816. 94

XXXVIII. Harold the Dauntless published. -- Scott aspires to

be a Baron of the Exchequer. -- Letter to the Duke of

Buccleuch concerning Poachers, etc. -- First Attack of Cramp

in the Stomach. -- Letters to Morritt, Terry, and Mrs.

Maclean Clephane. -- Story of The Doom of Devorgoil. -- John

Kemble's retirement from the Stage. -- William Laidlaw

established at Kaeside. -- Novel of Rob Roy projected. --

Letter to Southey on the Relief of the Poor, etc. -- Letter

to Lord Montagu on Hogg's Queen's Wake, and on the Death of

Frances, Lady Douglas. 1817. 135

XXXIX. Excursion to the Lennox, Glasgow, and Drumlanrig. --

Purchase of Toftfield. -- Establishment of the Ferguson

Family at Huntly Burn. -- Lines written in Illness. --

Visits of Washington Irving, Lady Byron, and Sir David

Wilkie. -- Progress of the Building at Abbotsford. --

Letters to Morritt, Terry, etc. -- Conclusion of Rob Roy.

1817. 173

XL. Rob Boy published. -- Negotiation concerning the Second

Series of Tales of my Landlord. -- Commission to search for

the {p.vii} Scottish Regalia. -- Letters to the Duke of

Buccleuch, Mr. Croker, Mr. Morritt, Mr. Murray, Mr. Maturin,

etc. -- Correspondence on Rural Affairs with Mr. Laidlaw,

and on the Buildings at Abbotsford with Mr. Terry. -- Death

of Mrs. Murray Keith and Mr. George Bullock. 1818. 202

XLI. Dinner at Mr. Home Drummond's. -- Scott's Edinburgh

Den. -- Details of his Domestic Life in Castle Street. --

His Sunday Dinners. -- His Evening Drives, etc. -- His

Conduct in the General Society of Edinburgh. -- Dinners at

John Ballantyne's Villa, and at James Ballantyne's in St.

John Street, on the appearance of a new Novel. -- Anecdotes

of the Ballantynes, and of Constable. 1818. 236

XLII. Publication of the Heart of Mid-Lothian. -- Its

Reception in Edinburgh and in England. -- Abbotsford in

October. -- Melrose Abbey, Dryburgh, etc. -- Lion-Hunters

from America. -- Tragedy of the Cherokee Lovers. -- Scott's

Dinner to the Selkirkshire Yeomen. 1818. 266

Appendix: The Durham Garland. 295

Narrative of the Life of James Annesley. 303

{p.viii} LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

WALTER SCOTT IN 1822 _Frontispiece_

From the painting by Sir Henry Raeburn, R. A., in the possession

of the Earl of Home.

MAIDA, THE SCOTTISH DEERHOUND 96

After the painting by Landseer made in 1824.

JOHN MURRAY 124

From the painting by Henry W. Pickersgill, R. A., in the

possession of John Murray, Esq.

WASHINGTON IRVING 180

After the painting by Charles Robert Leslie, R. A.

SCOTT'S HOUSE IN CASTLE STREET 250

After the drawing by J. M. W. Turner, R.A.

JOHN GIBSON LOCKHART 274

After the painting by Henry W. Pickersgill, R. A.

{p.001} CHAPTER XXXIV.

Progress of the Lord of the Isles. -- Correspondence with

Mr. Joseph Train. -- Rapid Completion of the Lord of the

Isles. -- "Refreshing the Machine." -- "Six Weeks at a

Christmas." -- Publication of the Poem, -- And of Guy

Mannering. -- Letters to Morritt, Terry, and John

Ballantyne. -- Anecdotes by James Ballantyne. -- Visit to

London. -- Meeting with Lord Byron. -- Dinners at Carlton

House.

1814-1815.

By the 11th of November, then, The Lord of the Isles had made great

progress, and Scott had also authorized Ballantyne to negotiate among

the booksellers for the publication of a second novel. But before I go

further into these transactions, I must introduce the circumstances of

Scott's first connection with an able and amiable man, whose services

were of high importance to him, at this time and ever after, in the

prosecution of his literary labors. Calling at Ballantyne's

printing-office while Waverley was in the press, he happened to take

up a proof sheet of a volume entitled "Poems, with notes illustrative

of traditions in Galloway and Ayrshire, by Joseph Train, Supervisor of

Excise at Newton-Stewart." The sheet contained a ballad on an Ayrshire

tradition, about a certain "Witch of Carrick," whose skill in the

black art was, it seems, instrumental in the destruction {p.002} of

one of the scattered vessels of the Spanish Armada. The ballad

begins:--

"Why gallops the palfrey with Lady Dunore?

Who drives away Turnberry's kine from the shore?

Go tell it in Carrick, and tell it in Kyle--

Although the proud Dons are now passing the Moil,[1]

On this magic clew,

That in fairyland grew,

Old Elcine de Aggart has taken in hand

To wind up their lives ere they win to our strand."

[Footnote 1: The Mull of Cantyre.]

Scott immediately wrote to the author, begging to be included in his

list of subscribers for a dozen copies, and suggesting at the same

time a verbal alteration in one of the stanzas of this ballad. Mr.

Train acknowledged his letter with gratitude, and the little book

reached him just as he was about to embark in the lighthouse yacht. He

took it with him on his voyage, and, on returning home again, wrote to

Mr. Train, expressing the gratification he had received from several

of his metrical pieces, but still more from his notes, and requesting

him, as he seemed to be enthusiastic about traditions and legends, to

communicate any matters of that order connected with Galloway which he

might not himself think of turning to account; "for," said Scott,

"nothing interests me so much as local anecdotes; and, as the

applications for charity usually conclude, the smallest donation will

be thankfully accepted."

Mr. Train, in a little narrative with which he has favored me, says,

that for some years before this time he had been engaged, in alliance

with a friend of his, Mr. Denniston, in collecting materials for a

History of Galloway; they had circulated lists of queries among the

clergy and parish schoolmasters, and had thus, and by their own

personal researches, accumulated "a great variety of the most

excellent materials for that purpose;" but that, from the hour of his

correspondence with Walter Scott, he "renounced every idea of

authorship for {p.003} himself," resolving, "that thenceforth his

chief pursuit should be collecting whatever he thought would be most

interesting to _him_;" and that Mr. Denniston was easily persuaded to

acquiesce in the abandonment of their original design. "Upon receiving

Mr. Scott's letter," says Mr. Train, "I became still more zealous in

the pursuit of ancient lore, and being the first person who had

attempted to collect old stories in that quarter with any view to

publication, I became so noted, that even beggars, in the hope of

reward, came frequently from afar to Newton-Stewart, to recite old

ballads and relate old stories to me." Erelong, Mr. Train visited

Scott both at Edinburgh and at Abbotsford; a true affection continued

ever afterwards to be maintained between them; and this generous ally

was, as the prefaces to the Waverley Novels signify, one of the

earliest confidants of that series of works, and certainly the most

efficient of all the author's friends in furnishing him with materials

for their composition. Nor did he confine himself to literary

services: whatever portable object of antiquarian curiosity met his

eye, this good man secured and treasured up with the same destination;

and if ever a catalogue of the museum at Abbotsford shall appear, no

single contributor, most assuredly, will fill so large a space in it

as Mr. Train.[2]

[Footnote 2: [Joseph Train was born in 1779, at

Gilminscroft, Sorn, Ayrshire, where his father was

grieve and land-steward. The boy was apprenticed at an

early age to a weaver in Ayr, but, notwithstanding the

narrowness of his circumstances, and a very imperfect

education, he even then showed a love of learning and a

passion for antiquarian lore. From 1799 to 1802 he

served in the Ayrshire militia. While the regiment was

stationed at Inverness, he became a subscriber to

Currie's edition of Burns, and his colonel, Sir David

Hunter-Blair, seeing the volumes at the bookseller's,

was surprised to learn that they had been ordered by one

of his men. Greatly pleased thereat, Sir David had the

books handsomely bound and sent to Train, free of

charge; and later obtained for him an appointment in the

Excise in the Ayr district. He was a faithful and

efficient officer, but owing to the then prevalent

custom of giving the higher places in the Excise to

Englishmen, all Scott's efforts for the advancement of

his friend were unavailing; he remained supervisor till

he went on the retired list in 1836. In 1829 Train was

admitted a member of the Scottish Society of

Antiquaries. Though the death of Scott made a sad blank

in his life, his interest in his favorite studies

continued to the end. The latter part of his life was

spent in a cottage at Castle Douglas, where he was

visited shortly before his death by James Hannay, who

found him in a little parlor, crowded with antiquities

of interest and value,--the antiquary, "a tall old man,

with an autumnal red in his face, hale looking, and of

simple, quaint manners." (See _Household Words_, July

10, 1853.) Train's last extended works were an

_Historical and Statistical Account of the Isle of Man,

with a view of its peculiar customs and popular

superstitions_ (1845); and a study of a local religious

sect in _The Buchanites from First to Last_ (1846); but

he was an occasional contributor to various periodicals.

He died December 1, 1852.]]

{p.004} His first considerable communication, after he had formed the

unselfish determination above mentioned, consisted of a collection of

anecdotes concerning the Galloway gypsies, and "a local story of an

astrologer, who calling at a farmhouse at the moment when the goodwife

was in travail, had, it was said, predicted the future fortune of the

child, almost in the words placed in the mouth of John MacKinlay, in

the Introduction to Guy Mannering." Scott told him, in reply, that the

story of the astrologer reminded him of "one he had heard in his

youth;" that is to say, as the Introduction explains, from this

MacKinlay; but Mr. Train has, since his friend's death, recovered a

rude _Durham_ ballad, which in fact contains a great deal more of the

main fable of Guy Mannering than either his own written, or

MacKinlay's oral edition of the _Gallovidian_ anecdote had conveyed;

and--possessing, as I do, numberless evidences of the haste with which

Scott drew up his beautiful Prefaces and Introductions of 1829, 1830,

and 1831--I am strongly inclined to think that he must in his boyhood

have read the Durham Broadside or Chapbook itself--as well as heard

the old serving-man's Scottish version of it.

However this may have been, Scott's answer to Mr. Train proceeded in

these words:--

I am now to solicit a favor, which I think your interest

{p.005} in Scottish antiquities will induce you readily to

comply with. I am very desirous to have some account of the

present state of _Turnberry Castle_--whether any vestiges of

it remain--what is the appearance of the ground--the names

of the neighboring places--and, above all, what are the

traditions of the place (if any) concerning its memorable

surprise by Bruce, upon his return from the coast of

Ireland, in the commencement of the brilliant part of his

career. The purpose of this is to furnish some hints for

notes to a work in which I am now engaged, and I need not

say I will have great pleasure in mentioning the source from

which I derive my information. I have only to add, with the

modest importunity of a lazy correspondent, that the sooner

you oblige me with an answer (if you can assist me on the

subject), the greater will the obligation be on me, who am

already your obliged humble servant,

W. SCOTT.

The recurrence of the word _Turnberry_, in the ballad of Elcine de

Aggart, had of course suggested this application, which was dated on

the 7th of November. "I had often," says Mr. Train, "when a boy,

climbed the brown hills, and traversed the shores of Carrick, but I

could not sufficiently remember the exact places and distances as to

which Mr. Scott inquired; so, immediately on receipt of his letter, I

made a journey into Ayrshire to collect all the information I possibly

could, and forwarded it to him on the 18th of the same month." Among

the particulars thus communicated, was the local superstition, that on

the anniversary of the night when Bruce landed at Turnberry from

Arran, the same meteoric gleam which had attended his voyage

reappeared, unfailingly, in the same quarter of the heavens. With this

circumstance Scott was much struck. "Your information," he writes on

the 22d November, "was particularly interesting and acceptable,

especially that which {p.006} relates to the supposed preternatural

appearance of the fire, etc., which I hope to make some use of." What

use he did make of it, if any reader has forgotten, will be seen by

reference to stanzas 7-17 of the 5th Canto of the Poem; and the notes

to the same Canto embody, with due acknowledgment, the more authentic

results of Mr. Train's pilgrimage to Carrick.

I shall recur presently to this communication from Mr. Train; but must

pause for a moment to introduce two letters, both written in the same

week with Scott's request as to the localities of Turnberry. They both

give us amusing sketches of his buoyant spirits at this period of

gigantic exertion;--and the first of them, which relates chiefly to

Maturin's Tragedy of Bertram, shows how he could still contrive to

steal time for attention to the affairs of brother authors less

energetic than himself.

TO DANIEL TERRY, ESQ.

ABBOTSFORD, November 10, 1814.

MY DEAR TERRY,--I should have long since answered your kind

letter by our friend Young, but he would tell you of my

departure with our trusty and well-beloved Erskine, on a

sort of a voyage to Nova Zembla. Since my return, I have

fallen under the tyrannical dominion of a certain Lord of

the Isles. Those Lords were famous for oppression in the

days of yore, and if I can judge by the posthumous despotism

exercised over me, they have not improved by their demise.

The _peine forte et dure_ is, you know, nothing in

comparison to being obliged to grind verses; and so devilish

repulsive is my disposition, that I can never put my wheel

into constant and regular motion, till Ballantyne's devil

claps in his proofs, like the hot cinder which you Bath

folks used to clap in beside an unexperienced turnspit, as a

hint to be expeditious in his duty. O long life to the old

hermit of Prague, who never saw pen and ink!--much happier

in {p.007} that negative circumstance than in his alliance

with the niece of King Gorboduc.

To talk upon a blither subject, I wish you saw Abbotsford,

which begins this season to look the whimsical, gay, odd

cabin, that we had chalked out. I have been obliged to

relinquish Stark's plan, which was greatly too expensive. So

I have made the old farmhouse my _corps de logis_, with some

outlying places for kitchen, laundry, and two spare

bedrooms, which run along the east wall of the farm-court,

not without some picturesque effect. A perforated cross, the

spoils of the old kirk of Galashiels, decorates an advanced

door, and looks very well. This little sly bit of sacrilege

has given our spare rooms the name of _the chapel_. I

earnestly invite you to a _pew_ there, which you will find

as commodious for the purpose of a nap as you have ever

experienced when, under the guidance of old Mrs. Smollett,

you were led to St. George's, Edinburgh.

I have been recommending to John Kemble (I dare say without

any chance of success) to peruse a MS. Tragedy of Maturin's

author of Montorio: it is one of those things which will

either succeed greatly or be damned gloriously, for its

merits are marked, deep, and striking, and its faults of a

nature obnoxious to ridicule. He had our old friend Satan

(none of your sneaking St. John Street devils, but the

arch-fiend himself) brought on the stage bodily. I believe I

have exorcised the foul fiend--for, though in reading he was

a most terrible fellow, I feared for his reception in

public. The last act is ill contrived. He piddles (so to

speak) through a cullender, and divides the whole horrors of

the catastrophe (though God wot there are enough of them)

into a kind of drippity-droppity of four or five scenes,

instead of inundating the audience with them at once in the

finale, with a grand "_gardez l'eau_." With all this, which

I should say had I written the thing myself, it is grand and

powerful; the language most animated and poetical; and the

characters {p.008} sketched with a masterly enthusiasm.

Many thanks for Captain Richard Falconer.[3] To your

kindness I owe the two books in the world I most longed to

see, not so much for their intrinsic merits, as because they

bring back with vivid associations the sentiments of my

childhood--I might almost say infancy. Nothing ever

disturbed my feelings more than when, sitting by the old oak

table, my aunt, Lady Raeburn, used to read the lamentable

catastrophe of the ship's departing without Captain

Falconer, in consequence of the whole party making free with

lime-punch on the eve of its being launched. This and

Captain Bingfield,[4] I much wished {p.009} to read once

more, and I owe the possession of both to your kindness.

Everybody that I see talks highly of your steady interest

with the public, wherewith, as I never doubted of it, I am

pleased but not surprised. We are just now leaving this for

the winter: the children went yesterday. Tom Purdie,

Finella, and the greyhounds, all in excellent health; the

latter have not been hunted this season!!! Can add nothing

more to excite your admiration. Mrs. Scott sends her kind

compliments.

W. SCOTT.

[Footnote 3: "_The Voyages, Dangerous Adventures, and

Imminent Escapes of Capt. Rich. Falconer._ Containing

the Laws, Customs, and Manners of the Indians in

America; his shipwrecks; his marrying an Indian wife;

his narrow escape from the Island of Dominico, etc.

Intermixed with the Voyages and Adventures of Thomas

Randal, of Cork, Pilot; with his Shipwreck in the

Baltick, being the only man that escap'd. His being

taken by the Indians of Virginia, etc. And an Account of

his Death. The Fourth Edition. London. Printed for J.

Marshall, at the Bible in Gracechurch Street. 1734."

On the fly-leaf is the following note, in Scott's

handwriting: "This book I read in early youth. I am

ignorant whether it is altogether fictitious and written

upon De Foe's plan, which it greatly resembles, or

whether it is only an exaggerated account of the

adventures of a real person. It is very scarce, for,

endeavoring to add it to the other favorites of my

infancy, I think I looked for it ten years to no

purpose, and at last owed it to the active kindness of

Mr. Terry. Yet Richard Falconer's adventures seem to

have passed through several editions."]

[Footnote 4: "_The Travels and Adventures of William

Bingfield, Esq._, containing, as surprizing a

Fluctuation of Circumstances, both by Sea and Land, as

ever befel one man. With an Accurate Account of the

Shape, Nature, and Properties of that most furious, and

amazing Animal, the Dog-Bird. Printed from his own

Manuscript. With a beautiful Frontispiece. 2 vols. 12mo.

London: Printed for E. Withers, at the Seven Stars, in

Fleet Street. 1753." On the fly-leaf of the first volume

Scott has written as follows: "I read this scarce little

_Voyage Imaginaire_ when I was about ten years old, and

long after sought for a copy without being able to find

a person who would so much as acknowledge having heard

of William Bingfield or his Dog-birds, until the

indefatigable kindness of my friend Mr. Terry, of the

Haymarket, made me master of this copy. I am therefore

induced to think the book is of very rare occurrence."

[In consequence of these Notes, both Falconer and

Bingfield have been recently reprinted in

London.--(1839.)]]

The following, dated a day after, refers to some lines which Mr.

Morritt had sent him from Worthing.

TO J. B. S. MORRITT, ESQ., M. P., WORTHING.

ABBOTSFORD, November 11, 1814.

MY DEAR MORRITT,--I had your kind letter with the beautiful

verses. May the Muse meet you often on the verge of the sea

or among your own woods of Rokeby! May you have spirits to

profit by her visits (and that implies all good wishes for

the continuance of Mrs. M.'s convalescence), and may I

often, by the fruits of your inspiration, have my share of

pleasure! My Muse is a Tyranness, and not a Christian queen,

and compels me to attend to longs and shorts, and I know not

what, when, God wot, I had rather be planting evergreens by

my new old fountain. You must know that, like the complaint

of a fine young boy who was complimented by a stranger on

his being a smart fellow, "I am sair halded down by _the

bubbly jock_." In other words, the turkey cock, at the head

of a family of some forty or fifty infidels, lays waste all

my shrubs. In vain I remonstrate with Charlotte upon these

occasions; she is in league with the hen-wife, the natural

protectress of these pirates; and I have only the inhuman

consolation that I may one day, like a cannibal, eat up my

enemies. This is but dull fun, but what else have I to tell

you about? It {p.010} would be worse if, like Justice

Shallow's Davy, I should consult you upon sowing down the

headland with wheat. My literary tormentor is a certain Lord

of the Isles, famed for his tyranny of yore, and not

unjustly. I am bothering some tale of him I have had long by

me into a sort of romance. I think you will like it: it is

Scottified up to the teeth, and somehow I feel myself like

the liberated chiefs of the Rolliad, "who boast their native

philabeg restored." I believe the frolics one can cut in

this loose garb are all set down by you Sassenachs to the

real agility of the wearer, and not the brave, free, and

independent character of his clothing. It is, in a word, the

real Highland fling, and no one is supposed able to dance it

but a native. I always thought that epithet of Gallia

_Braccata_ implied subjugation, and was never surprised at

Cæsar's easy conquests, considering that his Labienus and

all his merry men wore, as we say, bottomless breeks.

Ever yours,

W. S.

Well might he describe himself as being hard at work with his Lord of

the Isles. The date of Ballantyne's letter to Miss Edgeworth (November

11), in which he mentions the third Canto as completed; that of the

communication from Mr. Train (November 18), on which so much of Canto

Fifth was grounded; and that of a note from Scott to Ballantyne

(December 16, 1814), announcing that he had sent the last stanza of

the poem: these dates, taken together, afford conclusive evidence of

the fiery rapidity with which the three last Cantos of The Lord of the

Isles were composed.

He writes, on the 25th December, to Constable that he "had corrected

the last proofs, and was setting out for Abbotsford to refresh the

machine." And in what did his refreshment of the machine consist?

Besides having written within this year the greater part (almost, I

believe, the whole) of the Life of Swift--Waverley--and {p.011} The

Lord of the Isles--he had given two essays to the Encyclopædia

Supplement, and published, with an Introduction and notes, one of the

most curious pieces of family history ever produced to the world, on

which he labored with more than usual zeal and diligence, from his

warm affection for the noble representative of its author. This

inimitable Memorie of the Somervilles came out in October; and it was

speedily followed by an annotated reprint of the strange old treatise,

entitled "Rowland's letting off the humours of the blood in the head

vein, 1611." He had also kept up his private correspondence on a scale

which I believe never to have been exemplified in the case of any

other person who wrote continually for the press--except, perhaps,

Voltaire; and, to say nothing of strictly professional duties, he had,

as a vast heap of documents now before me proves, superintended from

day to day, except during his Hebridean voyage, the still perplexed

concerns of the Ballantynes, with a watchful assiduity that might have

done credit to the most diligent of tradesmen. The "machine" might

truly require "refreshment."

It was, as has been seen, on the 7th of November that Scott

acknowledged the receipt of that communication from Mr. Train which

included the story of the Galloway astrologer. There can be no doubt

that this story recalled to his mind, if not the Durham ballad, the

similar but more detailed corruption of it which he had heard told by

his father's servant, John MacKinlay, in the days of George's Square

and Green-breeks, and which he has preserved in the introduction to

Guy Mannering, as the groundwork of that tale. It has been shown that

the three last Cantos of The Lord of the Isles were written between

the 11th of November and the 25th of December; and it is therefore

scarcely to be supposed that any part of this novel had been penned

before he thus talked of "refreshing the machine." It is quite certain

that when James Ballantyne wrote to Miss Edgeworth on the {p.012}

11th November, he could not have seen one page of Guy Mannering, since

he in that letter announces that the new novel of his nameless friend

would depict manners _more ancient_ than those of 1745. And yet it is

equally certain, that before The Lord of the Isles was _published_,

which took place on the 18th of January, 1815, two volumes of Guy

Mannering had been not only written and copied by an amanuensis, but

printed.

Scott thus writes to Morritt, in sending him his copy of The Lord of

the Isles:--

TO J. B. S. MORRITT, ESQ., M. P., WORTHING.

EDINBURGH, 19th January, 1815.

MY DEAR MORRITT,--I have been very foolishly putting off my

writing until I should have time for a good long epistle;

and it is astonishing what a number of trifles have

interfered to prevent my commencing on a great scale. The

last of these has been rather of an extraordinary kind, for

your little friend Walter has chose to make himself the town

talk, by taking what seemed to be the small-pox, despite of

vaccination in infancy, and inoculation with the variolous

matter thereafter, which last I resorted to by way of making

assurance double sure. The medical gentleman who attended

him is of opinion that he _has_ had the real small-pox, but

it shall never be averred by me--for the catastrophe of Tom

Thumb is enough to deter any thinking person from entering

into a feud with the cows. Walter is quite well again, which

was the principal matter I was interested in. We had very

nearly been in a bad scrape, for I had fixed the Monday on

which he sickened, to take him with me for the Christmas

vacation to Abbotsford. It is probable that he would not

have pleaded headache when there was such a party in view,

especially as we were to shoot wild ducks one day together

at Cauldshiels Loch; and what the consequence of such a

journey might have been, God alone knows.

{p.013} I am clear of The Lord of the Isles, and I trust you

have your copy. It closes my poetic labors upon an extended

scale: but I dare say I shall always be dabbling in rhyme

until the _solve senescentem_. I have directed the copy to

be sent to Portland Place. I want to shake myself free of

Waverley, and accordingly have made a considerable exertion

to finish an odd little tale within such time as will

mystify the public, I trust--unless they suppose me to be

Briareus. Two volumes are already printed, and the only

persons in my confidence, W. Erskine and Ballantyne, are of

opinion that it is much more interesting than Waverley. It

is a tale of private life, and only varied by the perilous

exploits of smugglers and excisemen. The success of Waverley

has given me a spare hundred or two, which I have resolved

to spend in London this spring, bringing up Charlotte and

Sophia with me. I do not forget my English friends--but I

fear they will forget me, unless I show face now and then.

My correspondence gradually drops, as must happen when

people do not meet; and I long to see Ellis, Heber, Gifford,

and one or two more. I do not include Mrs. Morritt and you,

because we are much nearer neighbors, and within a whoop and

a holla in comparison. I think we should come up by sea, if

I were not a little afraid of Charlotte being startled by

the March winds--for our vacation begins 12th March.

You will have heard of poor Caberfae's death? What a pity it

is he should have outlived his promising young

representative. His state was truly pitiable--all his fine

faculties lost in paralytic imbecility, and yet not so

entirely so but that he perceived his deprivation as in a

glass darkly. Sometimes he was fretful and anxious because

he did not see his son; sometimes he expostulated and

complained that his boy had been allowed to die without his

seeing him; and sometimes, in a less clouded state of

intellect, he was sensible of, and lamented his loss in its

full extent. These, indeed, are {p.014} the "fears of the

brave, and follies of the wise,"[5] which sadden and

humiliate the lingering hours of prolonged existence. Our

friend Lady Hood will now be Caberfae herself. She has the

spirit of a chieftainess in every drop of her blood, but

there are few situations in which the cleverest women are so

apt to be imposed upon as in the management of landed

property, more especially of an Highland estate. I do fear

the accomplishment of the prophecy, that when there should

be a deaf Caberfae, the house was to fall.[6]

[Footnote 5: Johnson's _Vanity of Human Wishes_.]

[Footnote 6: Francis, Lord Seaforth, died 11th January,

1815, in his 60th year, having outlived four sons, all

of high promise. His title died with him, and he was

succeeded in his estates by his daughter, Lady Hood, now

the Hon. Mrs. Stewart-Mackenzie of Seaforth.--See some

verses on Lord Seaforth's death, in Scott's _Poetical

Works_, vol. viii. p. 392 [Cambridge Ed. p. 419]. The

Celtic designation of the chief of the clan MacKenzie,

_Caberfae_, means _Staghead_, the bearing of the family.

The prophecy which Scott alludes to in this letter is

also mentioned by Sir Humphry Davy in one of his

Journals (see his _Life_, by Dr. Davy, vol. ii. p.

72),--and it was, if the account be correct, a most

extraordinary one, for it connected the fall of the

house of Seaforth not only with the appearance of a deaf

_Caberfae_, but with the contemporaneous appearance of

various different physical misfortunes in several of the

other great Highland chiefs; all of which are said--and

were certainly believed both by Scott and Davy--to have

actually occurred within the memory of the generation

that has not yet passed away. Mr. Morritt can testify

thus far--that he "heard the prophecy quoted in the

Highlands at a time when Lord Seaforth had two sons both

alive and in good health--so that it certainly was not

made _après coup_." [Mrs. Stewart-Mackenzie died at

Brahan Castle in 1862, in her 79th year. "Her funeral

was one of the largest ever witnessed in the North." The

Seaforth estates passed to the eldest of her three

sons.]]

I am delighted to find Mrs. Morritt is recovering health and

strength--better walking on the beach at Worthing than on

the _plainstanes_ of Prince's Street, for the weather is

very severe here indeed. I trust Mrs. M. will, in her milder

climate, lay in such a stock of health and strength as may

enable you to face the north in Autumn. I have got the

nicest crib for you possible, just about twelve feet square,

and in the harmonious vicinity of a piggery. You never saw

so minute an establishment,--but {p.015} it has all that we

wish for, and all our friends will care about; and we long

to see you there. Charlotte sends the kindest remembrances

to Mrs. Morritt.

As for politics, I have thought little about them lately;

the high and exciting interest is so completely subsided,

that the wine is upon the lees. As for America, we have so

managed as to give her the appearance of triumph, and what

is worse, encouragement to resume the war upon a more

favorable opportunity. It was our business to have given

them a fearful memento that the babe unborn should have

remembered; but, having missed this opportunity, I believe

that this country would submit with great reluctance to

continue a war, for which there is really no specific

object. As for the Continental monarchs, there is no

guessing what the folly of Kings and Ministers may do; but

God knows! would any of them look at home, enough is to be

done which might strengthen and improve their dominions in a

different manner than by mere extension. I trust Ministers

will go out rather than be engaged in war again, upon any

account. If France is wise (I have no fear that any

superfluous feeling of humanity will stand in the way), she

will send 10,000 of her most refractory troops to fight with

Christophe and the yellow fever in the Island of St.

Domingo, and then I presume they may sit down in quiet at

home.

But my sheet grows to an end, and so does the pleading of

the learned counsel, who is thumping the poor bar as I

write. He hems twice. Forward, sweet Orator Higgins!--at

least till I sign myself, dear Morritt,

Yours most truly,

Walter SCOTT.

Guy Mannering was published on the 24th of February--that is, exactly

two months after The Lord of the Isles {p.016} was dismissed from the

author's desk; and--making but a narrow allowance for the operations

of the transcriber, printer, bookseller, etc., I think the dates I

have gathered together confirm the accuracy of what I have often heard

Scott say, that his second novel "was the work of six weeks at a

Christmas." Such was his recipe "for refreshing the machine."

I am sorry to have to add, that this severity of labor, like the

repetition of it which had such deplorable effects at a later period

of his life, was the result of his anxiety to acquit himself of

obligations arising out of his connection with the commercial

speculations of the Ballantynes. The approach of Christmas, 1814,

brought with it the prospect of such a recurrence of difficulties

about the discount of John's bills, as to render it absolutely

necessary that Scott should either apply again for assistance to his

private friends, or task his literary powers with some such

extravagant effort as has now been recorded. The great object, which

was still to get rid of the heavy stock that had been accumulated

before the storm of May, 1813, at length determined the chief partner

to break up, as soon as possible, the concern which his own sanguine

rashness, and the gross irregularities of his mercurial lieutenant,

had so lamentably perplexed; but Constable, having already enabled the

firm to avoid public exposure more than once, was not now, any more

than when he made his contract for The Lord of the Isles, disposed to

burden himself with an additional load of Weber's Beaumont and

Fletcher, and other almost as unsalable books. While they were still

in hopes of overcoming his scruples, it happened that a worthy friend

of Scott's, the late Mr. Charles Erskine, his sheriff-substitute in

Selkirkshire, had immediate occasion for a sum of money which he had

some time before advanced, at Scott's personal request, to the firm of

John Ballantyne and Company; and on receiving his application, Scott

wrote as follows:--

{p.017} TO MR. JOHN BALLANTYNE, BOOKSELLER, EDINBURGH.

ABBOTSFORD, October 14, 1814.

DEAR JOHN,--Charles Erskine wishes his money, as he has made

a purchase of land. This is a new perplexity--for paid he

must be forthwith--as his advance was friendly and

confidential. I do not at this moment see how it is to be

raised, but believe I shall find means. In the mean while,

it will be necessary to propitiate the Leviathans of

Paternoster Row. My idea is, that you or James should write

to them to the following effect: That a novel is offered you

by the Author of Waverley; that the author is desirous it

should be out before Mr. Scott's poem, or as soon thereafter

as possible; and that having resolved, as they are aware, to

relinquish publishing, you only wish to avail yourselves of

this offer to the extent of helping off some of your stock.

I leave it to you to consider whether you should condescend

on any particular work to offer them as bread to their

butter--or on any particular amount--as £500. One thing must

be provided, that Constable shares to the extent of the

Scottish sale--they, however, managing. My reason for

letting them have this scent of roast meat is, in case it

should be necessary for us to apply to them to renew bills

in December. Yours,

W. S.

Upon receiving this letter, John Ballantyne suggested to Scott that he

should be allowed to offer, not only the new novel, but the next

edition of Waverley, to Longman, Murray, or Blackwood--in the hope

that the prospect of being let in to the profits of the already

established favorite, would overcome effectually the hesitation of one

or other of these houses about venturing on the encumbrance which

Constable seemed to shrink from with such pertinacity; but upon this

ingenious proposition Scott at once set his _veto_. He writes (October

17, 1814):--

{p.018} DEAR JOHN,--

Your expedients are all wretched, as far as regards me. I

never will give Constable, or any one, room to say I have

broken my word with him in the slightest degree. If I lose

everything else, I will at least keep my honor unblemished;

and I do hold myself bound in honor to offer him a Waverley,

while he shall continue to comply with the conditions

annexed. I intend the new novel to operate as something more

permanent than a mere accommodation; and if I can but be

permitted to do so, I will print it before it is sold to any

one, and then propose, first to Constable and

Longman--second, to Murray and Blackwood--to take the whole

at such a rate as will give them one half of the fair

profits; granting acceptances which, upon an edition of

3000, which we shall be quite authorized to print, will

amount to an immediate command of £1500; and to this we may

couple the condition, that they must take £500 or £600 of

the old stock. I own I am not solicitous to deal with

Constable alone, nor am I at all bound to offer him the new

novel on any terms; but he, knowing of the intention, may

expect to be treated with, at least, although it is possible

we may not deal. However, if Murray and Blackwood were to

come forward with any handsome proposal as to the stock, I

should certainly have no objection to James's giving the

pledge of the Author of W. for his next work. You are like

the crane in the fable, when you boast of not having got

anything from the business; you may thank God that it did

not bite your head off. Would to God I were at let-a-be for

let-a-be;--but you have done your best, and so must I.

Yours truly,

W. S.

Both Mr. Murray, and Longman's partner, Mr. Rees, were in Scotland

about this time; and the former at least paid Scott a visit at

Abbotsford. Of course, however, whatever propositions they may have

made were received by one or other of the Ballantynes. The result was,

{p.019} that the house of Longman undertook Guy Mannering on the

terms dictated by Scott--namely, granting bills for £1500, and

relieving John Ballantyne and Company of stock to the extent of £500

more; and Constable's first information of the transaction was from

Messrs. Longman themselves, when they, in compliance with Scott's

wish, as signified in the letter last quoted, offered him a share in

the edition which they had purchased. With one or two exceptions,

originating in circumstances nearly similar, the house of Constable

published all the subsequent series of the Waverley Novels.

I must not, however, forget that The Lord of the Isles was published a

month before Guy Mannering. The poem was received with an interest

much heightened by the recent and growing success of the mysterious

Waverley. Its appearance, so rapidly following that novel, and

accompanied with the announcement of another prose tale, just about to

be published, by the same hand, puzzled and confounded the mob of

dulness.[7] The more sagacious few said to themselves--Scott is making

one serious effort more in his old line, and by this it will be

determined whether he does or does not altogether renounce that for

his new one.

[Footnote 7: John Ballantyne put forth the following

paragraph in the _Scots Magazine_ of December, 1814:--

"Mr. Scott's poem of _The Lord of the Isles_ will appear

early in January. The Author of _Waverley_ is about to

amuse the public with a new novel, in three volumes,

entitled _Guy Mannering_."]

The Edinburgh Review on The Lord of the Isles begins with,--

"Here is another genuine Lay of the Great Minstrel, with all

his characteristic faults, beauties, and irregularities. The

same glow of coloring--the same energy of narration--the

same amplitude of description are conspicuous--with the same

still more characteristic disdain of puny graces and small

originalities--the true poetical hardihood, in the strength

of which he urges on his Pegasus fearlessly through dense

and rare, and aiming gallantly at the great ends of truth

and effect, {p.020} stoops but rarely to study the means by

which they are to be attained; avails himself without

scruple of common sentiments and common images wherever they

seem fitted for his purpose; and is original by the very

boldness of his borrowing, and impressive by his disregard

of epigram and emphasis."

The conclusion of the contemporaneous article in the Quarterly Review

is as follows:--

"The many beautiful passages which we have extracted from

the poem, combined with the brief remarks subjoined to each

canto, will sufficiently show, that although The Lord of the

Isles is not likely to add very much to the reputation of

Mr. Scott, yet this must be imputed rather to the greatness

of his previous reputation, than to the absolute inferiority

of the poem itself. Unfortunately, its merits are merely

incidental, while its defects are mixed up with the very

elements of the poem. But it is not in the power of Mr.

Scott to write with tameness; be the subject what it will

(and he could not easily have chosen one more

impracticable), he impresses upon whatever scenes he

describes so much movement and activity,--he infuses into

his narrative such a flow of life, and, if we may so express

ourselves, of animal spirits, that without satisfying the

judgment, or moving the feelings, or elevating the mind, or

even very greatly interesting the curiosity, he is able to

seize upon, and, as it were, exhilarate the imagination of

his readers, in a manner which is often truly unaccountable.

This quality Mr. Scott possesses in an admirable degree; and

supposing that he had no other object in view than to

convince the world of the great poetical powers with which

he is gifted, the poem before us would be quite sufficient

for his purpose. But this is of very inferior importance to

the public; what they want is a good poem, and, as

experience has shown, this can only be constructed upon a

solid foundation of taste, and judgment, and meditation."

These passages appear to me to condense the result of deliberate and

candid reflection, and I have therefore quoted them. The most

important remarks of either Essayist on the details of the plot and

execution are annexed to the last edition of the poem; and show such

an {p.021} exact coincidence of judgment in two masters of their

calling, as had not hitherto been exemplified in the professional

criticism of his metrical romances. The defects which both point out

are, I presume, but too completely explained by the preceding

statement of the rapidity with which this, the last of those great

performances, had been thrown off; nor do I see that either Reviewer

has failed to do sufficient justice to the beauties which redeem the

imperfections of The Lord of the Isles--except as regards the whole

character of Bruce, its real hero, and the picture of the battle of

Bannockburn, which, now that one can compare these works from

something like the same point of view, does not appear to me in the

slightest particular inferior to the Flodden of Marmion.

This poem is now, I believe, about as popular as Rokeby; but it has

never reached the same station in general favor with the Lay, Marmion,

or The Lady of the Lake. The first edition of 1800 copies in quarto

was, however, rapidly disposed of, and the separate editions in 8vo,

which ensued before his poetical works were collected, amounted

together to 12,250 copies. This, in the case of almost any other

author, would have been splendid success; but as compared with what he

had previously experienced, even in his Rokeby, and still more so as

compared with the enormous circulation at once attained by Lord

Byron's early tales, which were then following each other in almost

breathless succession, the falling off was decided. One evening, some

days after the poem had been published, Scott requested James

Ballantyne to call on him, and the printer found him alone in his

library, working at the third volume of Guy Mannering. I give what

follows from Ballantyne's Memoranda:--

"'Well, James,' he said, 'I have given you a week--what are

people saying about The Lord of the Isles?' I hesitated a

little, after the fashion of Gil Blas, but he speedily

brought the matter to a point. 'Come,' he said, 'speak out,

my good {p.022} fellow; what has put it into your head to

be on so much ceremony _with me_ all of a sudden? But, I see

how it is, the result is given in one

word--_Disappointment_.' My silence admitted his inference

to the fullest extent. His countenance certainly did look

rather blank for a few seconds; in truth, he had been wholly

unprepared for the event; for it is a singular fact, that

before the public, or rather the booksellers, had given

their decision, he no more knew whether he had written well

or ill, than whether a die thrown out of a box was to turn

up a size or an ace. However, he instantly resumed his

spirits, and expressed his wonder rather that his poetical

popularity should have lasted so long, than that it should

have now at last given way. At length he said, with perfect

cheerfulness, 'Well, well, James, so be it--but you know we

must not droop, for we can't afford to give over. Since one

line has failed, we must just stick to something else:'--and

so he dismissed me and resumed his novel."

Ballantyne concludes the anecdote in these words:--

"He spoke thus, probably unaware of the undiscovered wonders

then slumbering in his mind. Yet still he could not but have

felt that the production of a few poems was nothing in

comparison of what must be in reserve for him, for he was at

this time scarcely more than forty.[8] An evening or two

after, I called again on him, and found on the table a copy

of The Giaour, which he seemed to have been reading. Having

an enthusiastic young lady in my house, I asked him if I

might carry the book home with me, but chancing to glance on

the autograph blazon, '_To the Monarch of Parnassus from one

of his subjects_,' instantly retracted my request, and said

I had not observed Lord Byron's inscription before. 'What

inscription?' said he; 'oh yes, I had forgot, but

inscription or no inscription, you are equally welcome.' I

again took it up, and he continued, 'James, Byron hits the

mark where I don't even pretend to fledge my arrow.' At this

time he had never seen Byron, but I knew he meant soon to be

in London, when, no doubt, the mighty consummation of the

meeting of the two bards would be accomplished; and I

ventured to say that he must be looking forward to it with

some interest. His countenance {p.023} became fixed, and he

answered impressively, 'Oh, of course.' In a minute or two

afterwards he rose from his chair, paced the room at a very

rapid rate, which was his practice in certain moods of mind,

then made a dead halt, and bursting into an extravaganza of

laughter, 'James,' cried he, 'I'll tell you what Byron

should say to me when we are about to accost each other,--

[Footnote 8: He was not forty-four till August, 1815.]

"Art thou the man whom men famed Grizzle call?"

And then how germane would be my answer,--

"Art thou the still more famed Tom Thumb the small?"'

"This," says the printer, "is a specimen of his peculiar

humor; it kept him full of mirth for the rest of the

evening."

The whole of the scene strikes me as equally and delightfully

characteristic; I may add, hardly more so of Scott than of his

printer; for Ballantyne, with all his profound worship of his friend

and benefactor, was in truth, even more than he, an undoubting

acquiescer in "the decision of the public, or rather of the

booksellers;" and among the many absurdities into which his reverence

for the popedom of Paternoster Row led him, I never could but consider

with special astonishment, the facility with which he seemed to have

adopted the notion that the Byron of 1814 was really entitled to

supplant Scott as a popular poet. Appreciating, as a man of his

talents could hardly fail to do, the splendidly original glow and

depth of Childe Harold, he always appeared to me quite blind to the

fact, that in The Giaour, in The Bride of Abydos, in Parisina, and

indeed in all his early serious narratives, Byron owed at least half

his success to clever, though perhaps unconscious imitation of Scott,

and no trivial share of the rest to the lavish use of materials which

Scott never employed, only because his genius was, from the beginning

to the end of his career, under the guidance of high and chivalrous

feelings of moral rectitude. All this Lord Byron himself seems to have

felt most completely--as witness the whole sequence of {p.024} his

letters and diaries;[9] and I think I see many symptoms that both the

decision of the million, and its index, "the decision of the

booksellers," tend the same way at present; but my business is to

record, as far as my means may permit, the growth and structure of one

great mind, and the effect which it produced upon the actual witnesses

of its manifestations, not to obtrude the conjectures of a partial

individual as to what rank posterity may assign it amongst or above

contemporary rivals.

[Footnote 9: _E. G._ "If they want to depose Scott, I

only wish they would not set me up as a competitor. I

like the man--and admire his works to what Mr. Braham

calls _Entusymusy_. All such stuff can only vex him, and

do me no good."--Byron (1813), vol. ii. p. 259.

"Scott is certainly the most wonderful writer of the

day. His novels are a new literature in themselves, and

his poetry as good as any--if not better (only on an

erroneous system), and only ceased to be popular,

because the vulgar learned were tired of hearing

'Aristides called the Just,' and Scott the Best, and

ostracized him."--Byron (1821), vol. v. p. 72.]

The following letter was addressed to Lord Byron on the receipt of

that copy of The Giaour to which Mr. Ballantyne's Memorandum refers: I

believe the inscription to Scott first appeared on the ninth edition

of the poem:

TO THE RIGHT HON. LORD BYRON, LONDON.

MY LORD,--I have long owed you my best thanks for the

uncommon pleasure I had in perusing your high-spirited

Turkish fragment. But I should hardly have ventured to offer

them, well knowing how you must be overwhelmed by volunteer

intrusions of approbation (which always look as if the

writer valued his opinion at fully more than it may be

worth) unless I had to-day learned that I have an apology

for entering upon the subject, from your having so kindly

sent me a copy of the poem. I did not receive it sooner,

owing to my absence from Edinburgh, where it had been lying

quietly at my house in Castle Street; so that I must have

seemed ungrateful, when, in truth, I was only modest. The

last offence may be forgiven, as not common in a lawyer

{p.025} and poet; the first is said to be equal to the

crime of witchcraft, but many an act of my life hath shown

that I am no conjurer. If I were, however, ten times more

modest than twenty years' attendance at the Bar renders

probable, your flattering inscription would cure me of so

unfashionable a malady. I might, indeed, lately have had a

legal title to as much supremacy on Parnassus as can be

conferred by a sign-manual, for I had a very flattering

offer of the laurel; but as I felt obliged, for a great many

reasons, to decline it, I am altogether unconscious of any

other title to sit high upon the forked hill.

To return to The Giaour; I had lent my first edition, but

the whole being imprinted in my memory, I had no difficulty

in tracing the additions, which are great improvements, as I

should have conjectured aforehand merely from their being

additions. I hope your Lordship intends to proceed with this

fascinating style of composition. You have access to a

stream of sentiments, imagery, and manners, which are so

little known to us as to convey all the interest of novelty,

yet so endeared to us by the early perusal of Eastern tales,

that we are not embarrassed with utter ignorance upon the

subject. Vathek, bating some passages, would have made a

charming subject for a tale. The conclusion is truly grand.

I would give a great deal to know the originals from which

it was drawn. Excuse this hasty scrawl, and believe me, my

Lord, your Lordship's much obliged, very humble servant,

Walter SCOTT.

If January brought the writer of this letter "disappointment," there

was abundant consolation in store for February, 1815. Guy Mannering

was received with eager curiosity, and pronounced by acclamation fully

worthy to share the honors of Waverley. The easy transparent flow of

its style; the beautiful simplicity, and here and there the wild

solemn magnificence of its {p.026} sketches of scenery; the rapid,

ever heightening interest of the narrative; the unaffected kindliness

of feeling, the manly purity of thought, everywhere mingled with a

gentle humor and a homely sagacity; but, above all, the rich variety

and skilful contrast of characters and manners, at once fresh in

fiction, and stamped with the unforgeable seal of truth and nature:

these were charms that spoke to every heart and mind; and the few

murmurs of pedantic criticism were lost in the voice of general

delight, which never fails to welcome the invention that introduces to

the sympathy of imagination a new group of immortal realities.

The earlier chapters of the present narrative have anticipated much of

what I might, perhaps with better judgment, have reserved for this

page. Taken together with the author's Introduction and Notes, those

anecdotes of his days of youthful wandering must, however, have

enabled the reader to trace almost as minutely as he could wish, the

sources from which the novelist drew his materials, both of scenery

and character; and the Durham Garland, which I print in the Appendix

to this volume, exhausts my information concerning the humble

groundwork on which fancy reared this delicious romance.[10]

[Footnote 10: I leave my text as it stood in the former

editions; but since the last of these appeared, a writer

in _The Gentleman's Magazine_ (July, 1840) has pointed

out some very remarkable coincidences between the

narrative of _Guy Mannering_ and the very singular

history of James Annesley, claimant in 1743 of the

honors and estates of the Earls of Anglesey, in Ireland.

That Sir Walter must have read the records of this

celebrated trial, as well as Smollett's edition of the

story in _Peregrine Pickle_, there can be no doubt. How

the circumstance had not recurred to his memory when

writing the explanatory Introduction to his Novel, I can

offer no conjecture. Very possibly the _Garland_ itself

may have been framed after the Annesley trial took

place.--(1841.) [The paper in _The Gentleman's

Magazine_, referred to above, will be found in the

Appendix to this volume.]]

The first edition was, like that of Waverley, in three little volumes,

with a humility of paper and printing which the meanest novelist would

now disdain to imitate; {p.027} the price a guinea. The 2000 copies

of which it consisted were sold the day after the publication; and

within three months came a second and a third impression, making

together 5000 copies more. The sale, before those novels began to be

collected, had reached nearly 10,000; and since then (to say nothing

of foreign reprints of the text, and myriads of translations into

every tongue of Europe) the domestic sale has amounted to 50,000.

On the rising of the Court of Session in March, Mr. and Mrs. Scott

went by sea to London with their eldest girl, whom, being yet too

young for general society, they again deposited with Joanna Baillie at

Hampstead, while they themselves resumed, for two months, their usual

quarters at kind Miss Dumergue's in Piccadilly. Six years had elapsed

since Scott last appeared in the metropolis; and brilliant as his

reception had then been, it was still more so on the present occasion.

Scotland had been visited in the interim, chiefly from the interest

excited by his writings, by crowds of the English nobility, most of

whom had found introduction to his personal acquaintance--not a few

had partaken of his hospitality at Ashestiel or Abbotsford. The

generation among whom, I presume, a genius of this order feels his

own influence with the proudest and sweetest confidence--on whose

fresh minds and ears he has himself made the first indelible

impressions--the generation with whose earliest romance of the heart

and fancy his idea had been blended, was now grown to the full

stature; the success of these recent novels, seen on every table, the

subject of every conversation, had, with those who did not doubt their

parentage, far more than counterweighed his declination, dubious after

all, in the poetical balance; while the mystery that hung over them

quickened the curiosity of the hesitating and conjecturing many--and

the name on which ever and anon some new circumstance accumulated

stronger suspicion, loomed larger through the {p.028} haze in which

he had thought fit to envelop it. Moreover, this was a period of high

national pride and excitement.

"O who that shared them ever shall forget

The emotions of the spirit-rousing time,

When breathless in the mart the couriers met,

Early and late, at evening and at prime;

When the loud cannon and the merry chime

Hail'd news on news, as field on field was won,

When Hope, long doubtful, soared at length sublime,

And our glad eyes, awake as day begun,

Watch'd Joy's broad banner rise, to meet the rising sun?

"O these were hours, when thrilling joy repaid

A long, long course of darkness, doubts, and fears!

The heart-sick faintness of the hope delayed,

The waste, the woe, the bloodshed, and the tears

That tracked with terror twenty rolling years--

All was forgot in that blithe jubilee.

Her downcast eye even pale Affliction rears,

To sigh a thankful prayer amid the glee

That hailed the Despot's fall, and peace and liberty!"[11]

[Footnote 11: _Lord of the Isles_, Canto vi.]

At such a time, Prince and people were well prepared to hail him who,

more perhaps than any other master of the pen, had contributed to

sustain the spirit of England throughout the struggle, which was as

yet supposed to have been terminated on the field of Toulouse. "Thank

Heaven you are coming at last!" Joanna Baillie had written a month or

two before. "Make up your mind to be stared at only a little less than

the Czar of Muscovy, or old Blücher."

And now took place James Ballantyne's "mighty consummation of the

meeting of the two bards." Scott's own account of it, in a letter to

Mr. Moore, must have been seen by most of my readers; yet I think it

ought also to find a place here. He says:--

"It was in the spring of 1815, that, chancing to be in London, I had

the advantage of a personal introduction {p.029} to Lord Byron.

Report had prepared me to meet a man of peculiar habits and a quick

temper, and I had some doubts whether we were likely to suit each

other in society. I was most agreeably disappointed in this respect. I

found Lord Byron in the highest degree courteous, and even kind. We

met for an hour or two almost daily, in Mr. Murray's drawing-room, and

found a great deal to say to each other.[12] We also met frequently in

parties and evening society, so that for about two months I had the

advantage of a considerable intimacy with this distinguished

individual. Our sentiments agreed a good deal, except upon the

subjects of religion and politics, upon neither of which I was

inclined to believe that Lord Byron entertained very fixed opinions. I

remember saying to him, that I really thought that if he lived a few

years he would alter his sentiments. He answered, rather sharply, 'I

suppose you are one of those who prophesy I shall turn Methodist.' I

replied: 'No, I don't expect your conversion to be of such an ordinary

kind. I would rather look to see you retreat upon the Catholic faith,

and distinguish yourself by the austerity of your penances. The

species of religion to which you must, or may, one day attach

yourself, must exercise a strong power on the imagination.' He smiled

gravely, and seemed to allow I might be right.

[Footnote 12: [John Murray--the third of the name--gives

some interesting notes of his recollections of these

meetings in Albemarle Street, in the _Memoirs_ of his

father (vol. i. p. 267).]]

"On politics, he used sometimes to express a high strain of what is

now called Liberalism; but it appeared to me that the pleasure it

afforded him, as a vehicle for displaying his wit and satire against

individuals in office, was at the bottom of this habit of thinking,

rather than any real conviction of the political principles on which

he talked. He was certainly proud of his rank and ancient family, and,

in that respect, as much an aristocrat {p.030} as was consistent with

good sense and good breeding. Some disgusts, how adopted I know not,

seemed to me to have given this peculiar and (as it appeared to me)

contradictory cast of mind; but, at heart, I would have termed Byron a

patrician on principle.

"Lord Byron's reading did not seem to me to have been very extensive,

either in poetry or history. Having the advantage of him in that

respect, and possessing a good competent share of such reading as is

little read, I was sometimes able to put under his eye objects which

had for him the interest of novelty. I remember particularly repeating

to him the fine poem of Hardyknute, an imitation of the old Scottish

ballad, with which he was so much affected, that some one who was in

the same apartment asked me what I could possibly have been telling

Byron by which he was so much agitated.

"I saw Byron for the last time in 1815, after I returned from France.

He dined, or lunched, with me at Long's, in Bond Street. I never saw

him so full of gayety and good-humor, to which the presence of Mr.

Mathews, the comedian, added not a little. Poor Terry was also

present. After one of the gayest parties I ever was present at, my

fellow-traveller, Mr. Scott of Gala, and I set off for Scotland, and I

never saw Lord Byron again. Several letters passed between us--one

perhaps every half-year. Like the old heroes in Homer, we exchanged

gifts. I gave Byron a beautiful dagger mounted with gold, which had

been the property of the redoubted Elfi Bey. But I was to play the

part of Diomed in the Iliad, for Byron sent me, some time after, a

large sepulchral vase of silver. It was full of dead men's bones, and

had inscriptions on two sides of the base. One ran thus: 'The bones

contained in this urn were found in certain ancient sepulchres within

the long walls of Athens, in the month of February, 1811.' The other

face bears the lines of Juvenal: '_Expende--quot libras in duce summo

{p.031} invenies?--Mors sola fatetur quantula sint hominum

corpuscula._'

"To these I have added a third inscription, in these words, 'The gift

of Lord Byron to Walter Scott.'[13] There was a letter with this vase,

more valuable to me than the gift itself, from the kindness with which

the donor expressed himself towards me. I left it naturally in the urn

with the bones; but it is now missing. As the theft was not of a

nature to be practised by a mere domestic, I am compelled to suspect

the inhospitality of some individual of higher station, most

gratuitously exercised certainly, since, after what I have here said,

no one will probably choose to boast of possessing this literary

curiosity.

[Footnote 13: Mr. Murray had, at the time of giving the

vase, suggested to Lord Byron, that it would increase

the value of the gift to add some such inscription; but

the noble poet answered modestly,--

"April 9, 1815. DEAR MURRAY,--I have a great objection

to your proposition about inscribing the vase--which is,

that it would appear _ostentatious_ on my part; and of

course I must send it as it is, without any alteration.

Yours ever, BYRON."]

"We had a good deal of laughing, I remember, on what the public might

be supposed to think, or say, concerning the gloomy and ominous nature

of our mutual gifts.

"I think I can add little more to my recollections of Byron. He was

often melancholy--almost gloomy. When I observed him in this humor, I

used either to wait till it went off of its own accord, or till some

natural and easy mode occurred of leading him into conversation, when

the shadows almost always left his countenance, like the mist rising

from a landscape. In conversation he was very animated.

"I met with him very frequently in society; our mutual acquaintances

doing me the honor to think that he liked to meet with me. Some very

agreeable parties I can recollect--particularly one at Sir George

Beaumont's--where the amiable landlord had assembled some persons

{p.032} distinguished for talent. Of these I need only mention the

late Sir Humphry Davy, whose talents for literature were as remarkable

as his empire over science. Mr. Richard Sharpe and Mr. Rogers were

also present.

"I think I also remarked in Byron's temper starts of suspicion, when

he seemed to pause and consider whether there had not been a secret,

and perhaps offensive, meaning in something casually said to him. In

this case, I also judged it best to let his mind, like a troubled

spring, work itself clear, which it did in a minute or two. I was

considerably older, you will recollect, than my noble friend, and had

no reason to fear his misconstruing my sentiments towards him, nor had

I ever the slightest reason to doubt that they were kindly returned on

his part. If I had occasion to be mortified by the display of genius

which threw into the shade such pretensions as I was then supposed to

possess, I might console myself that, in my own case, the materials of

mental happiness had been mingled in a greater proportion.

"I rummage my brains in vain for what often rushes into my head

unbidden--little traits and sayings which recall his looks, manner,

tone, and gestures; and I have always continued to think that a crisis

of life was arrived, in which a new career of fame was opened to him,

and that had he been permitted to start upon it, he would have

obliterated the memory of such parts of his life as friends would wish

to forget."

I have nothing to add to this interesting passage, except that Joanna

Baillie's tragedy of The Family Legend being performed at one of the

theatres during Scott's stay in town, Lord Byron accompanied the

authoress and Mr. and Mrs. Scott to witness the representation; and

that the vase with the Attic bones appears to have been sent to Scott

very soon after his arrival in London, not, as Mr. Moore had gathered

from the hasty diction of his Reminiscences, at some "subsequent

period of their acquaintance." {p.033} This is sufficiently proved by

the following note:--

TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE LORD BYRON, ETC., ETC.

PICCADILLY, MONDAY.

MY DEAR LORD,--I am not a little ashamed of the value of the

shrine in which your Lordship has enclosed the Attic relics;

but were it yet more costly, the circumstance could not add

value to it in my estimation, when considered as a pledge of

your Lordship's regard and friendship. The principal

pleasure which I have derived from my connection with

literature has been the access which it has given me to

those who are distinguished by talents and accomplishments;

and, standing so high as your Lordship justly does in that

rank, my satisfaction in making your acquaintance has been

proportionally great. It is one of those wishes which, after

having been long and earnestly entertained, I have found

completely gratified upon becoming personally known to you;

and I trust you will permit me to profit by it frequently,

during my stay in town. I am, my dear Lord, your truly

obliged and faithful

Walter SCOTT.

It was also in the spring of 1815 that Scott had, for the first time,

the honor of being presented to the Prince Regent. His Royal Highness

had (as has been seen from a letter to Joanna Baillie, already quoted)

signified, more than a year before this time, his wish that the poet

should revisit London--and, on reading his Edinburgh Address in

particular, he said to Mr. Dundas, that "Walter Scott's charming

behavior about the laureateship had made him doubly desirous of seeing

him at Carlton House." More lately, on receiving a copy of The Lord of

the Isles, his Royal Highness's librarian had been commanded to write

to him in these terms:--

{p.034} TO WALTER SCOTT, ESQ., EDINBURGH.

CARLTON HOUSE, January 19, 1815.

MY DEAR SIR,--You are deservedly so great a favorite with

the Prince Regent, that his librarian is not only directed

to return you the thanks of his Royal Highness for your

valuable present, but to inform you that the Prince Regent

particularly wishes to see you whenever you come to London;

and desires you will always, when you are there, come into

his library whenever you please. Believe me always, with

sincerity, one of your warmest admirers, and most obliged

friends,

J. S. CLARKE.

On hearing from Mr. Croker (then Secretary to the Admiralty) that

Scott was to be in town by the middle of March, the Prince said, "Let

me know when he comes, and I'll get up a snug little dinner that will

suit him;" and, after he had been presented and graciously received at

the levee, he was invited to dinner accordingly, through his excellent

friend Mr. Adam (now Lord Chief Commissioner of the Jury Court in

Scotland),[14] who at that time held a confidential office in the

royal household. The Regent had consulted with Mr. Adam also as to the

composition of the party. "Let us have," said he, "just a few friends

of his own--and the more Scotch the better;" and both the Chief

Commissioner and Mr. Croker assure me that the party was the most

interesting and agreeable one in their recollection. It comprised, I

believe, the Duke of York--the late Duke of Gordon (then Marquis of

Huntly)--the Marquis of Hertford (then Lord Yarmouth)--the Earl of

Fife--and {p.035} Scott's early friend Lord Melville. "The Prince and

Scott," says Mr. Croker, "were the two most brilliant story-tellers in

their several ways, that I have ever happened to meet; they were both

aware of their _forte_, and both exerted themselves that evening with

delightful effect. On going home, I really could not decide which of

them had shone the most. The Regent was enchanted with Scott, as Scott

with him; and on all his subsequent visits to London, he was a

frequent guest at the royal table." The Lord Chief Commissioner

remembers that the Prince was particularly delighted with the poet's

anecdotes of the old Scotch judges and lawyers, which his Royal

Highness sometimes _capped_ by ludicrous traits of certain ermined

sages of his own acquaintance. Scott told, among others, a story,

which he was fond of telling; and the commentary of his Royal Highness

on hearing it amused Scott, who often mentioned it afterwards. The

anecdote is this: A certain Judge, whenever he went on a particular

circuit, was in the habit of visiting a gentleman of good fortune in

the neighborhood of one of the assize towns, and staying at least one

night, which, being both of them ardent chess-players, they usually

concluded with their favorite game. One Spring circuit the battle was

not decided at daybreak, so the Judge said, "Weel, Donald, I must e'en

come back this gate in the harvest, and let the game lie ower for the

present;" and back he came in October, but not to his old friend's

hospitable house; for that gentleman had, in the interim, been

apprehended on a capital charge (of forgery), and his name stood on

the _Porteous Roll_, or list of those who were about to be tried under

his former guest's auspices. The laird was indicted and tried

accordingly, and the jury returned a verdict of _guilty_. The Judge

forthwith put on his cocked hat (which answers to the black cap in

England), and pronounced the sentence of the law in the usual terms:

"To be hanged by the neck until you be dead; and may the Lord have

{p.036} mercy upon your unhappy soul!" Having concluded this awful

formula in his most sonorous cadence, the Judge, dismounting his

formidable beaver, gave a familiar nod to his unfortunate

acquaintance, and said to him in a sort of chuckling whisper, "And

now, Donald, my man, I think I've checkmated you for ance." The Regent

laughed heartily at this specimen of judicial humor; and "I' faith,

Walter," said he, "this old big-wig seems to have taken things as

coolly as my tyrannical self. Don't you remember Tom Moore's

description of me at breakfast,--

'The table spread with tea and toast,

Death-warrants and the Morning Post?'"

[Footnote 14: This most amiable and venerable gentleman,

my dear and kind friend, died at Edinburgh on the 17th

February, 1839, in the 80th year of his age. He retained

his strong mental faculties in their perfect vigor to

the last days of this long life, and with them all the

warmth of social feelings which had endeared him to all

who were so happy as to have any opportunity of knowing

him. The reader will find an affectionate tribute to his

worth, from Sir Walter Scott's Diary, in a subsequent

volume of these Memoirs.--(March, 1839.)]

Towards midnight, the Prince called for "a bumper, with all the

honors, to the Author of Waverley," and looked significantly, as he

was charging his own glass, to Scott. Scott seemed somewhat puzzled

for a moment, but instantly recovering himself, and filling his glass

to the brim, said, "Your Royal Highness looks as if you thought I had

some claim to the honors of this toast. I have no such pretensions,

but shall take good care that the real Simon Pure hears of the high

compliment that has now been paid him." He then drank off his claret,

and joined in the cheering, which the Prince himself timed. But before

the company could resume their seats, his Royal Highness exclaimed,

"Another of the same, if you please, to the Author of Marmion--and

now, Walter, my man, I have checkmated you for _ance_." The second

bumper was followed by cheers still more prolonged: and Scott then

rose and returned thanks in a short address, which struck the Lord

Chief Commissioner as "alike grave and graceful." This story has been

circulated in a very perverted shape. I now give it on the authority

of my venerated friend. He adds, that having occasion, the day after,

to call on the Duke of York, his Royal Highness said to him: "Upon my

word, Adam, my brother went rather too near the wind about

Waverley--but {p.037} nobody could have turned the thing more

prettily than Walter Scott did--and upon the whole I never had better

fun."[15]

[Footnote 15: Since this narrative was first published,

I have been told by two gentlemen who were at this

dinner, that, according to their recollection, the

Prince _did not_ on that occasion run so "near the wind"

as my text represents; and I am inclined to believe that

a scene at Dalkeith, in 1822, may have been

unconsciously blended with a gentler rehearsal of

Carlton House, 1815. The Chief Commissioner had promised

to revise my sheets for the present edition; but alas,

he never did so--and I must now leave the matter as it

stands.--(1839.)]

The Regent, as was his custom with those he most delighted to honor,

uniformly addressed the poet, even at their first dinner, by his

Christian name, "Walter."

Before he left town, he again dined at Carlton House, when the party

was a still smaller one than before, and the merriment, if possible,

still more free. That nothing might be wanting, the Prince sung

several capital songs in the course of that evening--as witness the

lines in Sultan Serendib:[16]--

"I love a Prince will bid the bottle pass,

Exchanging with his subjects glance and glass,

In fitting time can, gayest of the gay,

Keep up the jest and mingle in the lay.

Such Monarchs best our freeborn humor suit,

But despots must be stately, stern, and mute."[17]

[Footnote 16: [_The Search after Happiness._]]

[Footnote 17: Scott's _Poetical Works_, vol. xi. p. 353

[Cambridge Ed. p. 431].]

Before he returned to Edinburgh, on the 22d of May, the Regent sent

him a gold snuff-box, set in brilliants, with a medallion of his Royal

Highness's head on the lid, "as a testimony" (writes Mr. Adam, in

transmitting it) "of the high opinion his Royal Highness entertains of

your genius and merit."

I transcribe what follows from James Ballantyne's _Memoranda_:--

"After Mr. Scott's first interview with his Sovereign, one

or two intimate friends took the liberty of inquiring, what

judgment he had formed of the Regent's talents? He declined

{p.038} giving any definite answer--but repeated that 'he

was the first gentleman he had seen--certainly the first

_English_ gentleman of his day;--there was something about

him which, independently of the _prestige_, the "divinity,

which hedges a King," marked him as standing entirely by

himself; but as to his abilities, spoken of as distinct from

his charming manners, how could any one form a fair judgment

of that man who introduced whatever subject he chose,

discussed it just as long as he chose, and dismissed it when

he chose?'"

Ballantyne adds:--

"What I have now to say is more important, not only in

itself, but as it will enable you to give a final

contradiction to an injurious report which has been in

circulation; namely, that the Regent asked him as to the

authorship of Waverley, and received a distinct and solemn

denial. I took the bold freedom of requesting to know _from

him_ whether his Royal Highness had questioned him on that

subject, and what had been his answer. He glanced at me with

a look of mild surprise, and said, 'What answer I might have

made to such a question, put to me by my Sovereign, perhaps

I do not, or rather perhaps I do know; but I was never put

to the test. He is far too well-bred a man ever to put so

ill-bred a question.'"

The account I have already given of the convivial scene alluded to

would probably have been sufficient; but it can do no harm to place

Ballantyne's, or rather Scott's own testimony, also on record.

I ought not to have omitted, that during Scott's residence in London,

in April, 1815, he lost one of the English friends, to a meeting with

whom he had looked forward with the highest pleasure. Mr. George Ellis

died on the 15th of that month, at his seat of Sunning Hill. This

threw a cloud over what would otherwise have been a period of unmixed

enjoyment. Mr. Canning penned the epitaph for that dearest of his

friends, but he submitted it to Scott's consideration before it was

engraved.

{p.039} CHAPTER XXXV.

Battle of Waterloo. -- Letter of Sir Charles Bell. -- Visit

to the Continent. -- Waterloo. -- Letters from Brussels and

Paris. -- Anecdotes of Scott at Paris. -- The Duke of

Wellington. -- The Emperor Alexander. -- Blücher. --

Platoff. -- Party at Ermenonville, etc. -- London. --

Parting with Lord Byron. -- Scott's Sheffield Knife. --

Return to Abbotsford. -- Anecdotes by Mr. Skene and James

Ballantyne.

1815.

Goethe expressed, I fancy, a very general sentiment, when he said,

that to him the great charm and value of my friend's Life of

Buonaparte seemed quite independent of the question of its accuracy as

to small details; that he turned eagerly to the book, not to find

dates sifted, and countermarches analyzed, but to contemplate what

could not but be a true record of the broad impressions made on the

mind of Scott by the marvellous revolutions of his own time in their

progress. Feeling how justly in the main that work has preserved those

impressions, though gracefully softened and sobered in the retrospect

of peaceful and more advanced years, I the less regret that I have it

not in my power to quote any letters of his touching the reappearance

of Napoleon on the soil of France--the immortal march from Cannes--the

reign of the Hundred Days, and the preparations for another struggle,

which fixed the gaze of Europe in May, 1815.

That he should have been among the first civilians {p.040} who

hurried over to see the field of Waterloo, and hear English bugles

sound about the walls of Paris, could have surprised none who knew the

lively concern he had always taken in the military efforts of his

countrymen, and the career of the illustrious captain, who had taught

them to reëstablish the renown of Agincourt and Blenheim,--

"Victor of Assaye's Eastern plain,

Victor of all the fields of Spain."

I had often heard him say, however, that his determination was, if not

fixed, much quickened by a letter of an old acquaintance of his, who

had, on the arrival of the news of the 18th of June, instantly

repaired to Brussels, to tender his professional skill in aid of the

overburdened medical staff of the conqueror's army. When, therefore, I

found the letter in question preserved among Scott's papers, I perused

it with a peculiar interest; and I now venture, with the writer's

permission, to present it to the reader. It was addressed by Sir

Charles Bell to his brother, an eminent barrister in Edinburgh, who

transmitted it to Scott. "When I read it," said he, "it set me on

fire." The marriage of Miss Maclean Clephane of Torloisk with the Earl

Compton (now Marquis of Northampton), which took place on the 24th of

July, was in fact the only cause why he did not leave Scotland

instantly; for that dear young friend had chosen Scott for her

guardian, and on him accordingly devolved the chief care of the

arrangements on this occasion. The extract sent to him by Mr. George

Joseph Bell is as follows:--

"BRUSSELS, 2d July, 1815.

"This country, the finest in the world, has been of late

quite out of our minds. I did not, in any degree, anticipate

the pleasure I should enjoy, the admiration forced from me,

on coming into one of these antique towns, or in journeying

through the rich garden. Can you recollect the time when

there were gentlemen meeting at the Cross of Edinburgh, or

those whom we thought such? They are all collected here.

{p.041} You see the very men, with their scraggy necks

sticking out of the collars of their old-fashioned

square-skirted coats--their canes--their cocked-hats; and,

when they meet, the formal bow, the hat off to the ground,

and the powder flying in the wind. I could divert you with

the odd resemblances of the Scottish faces among the

peasants, too--but I noted _them_ at the time with my

pencil, and I write to you only of things that you won't

find in my pocket-book.

"I have just returned from seeing the French wounded

received in their hospital; and could you see them laid out

naked, or almost so--100 in a row of low beds on the

ground--though wounded, exhausted, beaten, you would still

conclude with me that these were men capable of marching

unopposed from the west of Europe to the east of Asia.

Strong, thickset, hardy veterans, brave spirits and

unsubdued, as they cast their wild glance upon you,--their

black eyes and brown cheeks finely contrasted with the fresh

sheets,--you would much admire their capacity of adaptation.

These fellows are brought from the field after lying many

days on the ground; many dying--many in the agony--many

miserably racked with pain and spasms; and the next mimics

his fellow, and gives it a tune,--_Aha, vous chantez bien!_

How they are wounded you will see in my notes. But I must

not have you to lose the present impression on me of the

formidable nature of these fellows as exemplars of the breed

in France. It is a forced praise; for from all I have seen,

and all I have heard of their fierceness, cruelty, and

bloodthirstiness, I cannot convey to you my detestation of

this race of trained banditti. By what means they are to be

kept in subjection until other habits come upon them, I know

not; but I am convinced that these men cannot be left to the

bent of their propensities.

"This superb city is now ornamented with the finest groups

of armed men that the most romantic fancy could dream of. I

was struck with the words of a friend--E. 'I saw,' said he,

'_that_ man returning from the field on the 16th.' (This was

a Brunswicker, of the Black or Death Hussars.) 'He was

wounded, and had had his arm amputated on the field. He was

among the first that came in. He rode straight and stark

upon his horse--the bloody clouts about his stump--pale as

death, but upright, with a stern, fixed expression of

{p.042} feature, as if loath to lose his revenge.' These

troops are very remarkable in their fine military

appearance; their dark and ominous dress sets off to

advantage their strong, manly, northern features and white

mustachios; and there is something more than commonly

impressive about the whole effect.

"This is the second Sunday after the battle, and many are

not yet dressed. There are 20,000 wounded in this town,

besides those in the hospitals, and the many in the other

towns;--only 3000 prisoners; 80,000, they say, killed and

wounded on both sides."

I think it not wonderful that this extract should have set Scott's

imagination effectually on fire; that he should have grasped at the

idea of seeing probably the last shadows of real warfare that his own

age would afford; or that some parts of the great surgeon's simple

phraseology are reproduced, almost verbatim, in the first of Paul's

Letters to his Kinsfolk. No sooner was Scott's purpose known, than

some of his young neighbors in the country proposed to join his

excursion; and, in company with three of them, namely, his kinsman,

John Scott of Gala, Alexander Pringle, the younger, of Whytbank (now

M. P. for Selkirkshire), and Robert Bruce, advocate (now Sheriff of

Argyle), he left Edinburgh for the south, at 5. A. M. on the 27th of

July.

They travelled by the stage-coach, and took the route of Hull and

Lincoln to Cambridge; for Gala and Whytbank, being both members of

that university, were anxious to seize this opportunity of revisiting

it themselves, and showing its beautiful architecture to their friend.

After this wish had been gratified, they proceeded to Harwich, and

thence, on the 3d of August, took ship for Helvoetsluys.

"The weather was beautiful," says Gala, "so we all went

outside the coach from Cambridge to Harwich. At starting,

there was a general complaint of thirst, the consequence of

some experiments overnight on the celebrated _bishop_ of my

_Alma Mater_; our friend, however, was in great glee, and

{p.043} never was a merrier _basket_ than he made it all

the morning. He had cautioned us, on leaving Edinburgh,

never to _name names_ in such situations, and our adherence

to this rule was rewarded by some amusing incidents. For

example, as we entered the town where we were to dine, a

heavy-looking man, who was to stop there, took occasion to

thank Scott for the pleasure his anecdotes had afforded him:

'You have a good memory, sir,' said he; 'mayhap, now, you

sometimes write down what you hear or be a-reading about?'

He answered, very gravely, that he did occasionally put down

a _few_ notes, if anything struck him particularly. In the

afternoon, it happened that he sat on the box, while the

rest of us were behind him. Here, by degrees, he became

quite absorbed in his own reflections. He frequently

repeated to himself, or _composed_ perhaps, for a good

while, and often smiled or raised his hand, seeming

completely occupied and amused. His neighbor, a vastly

scientific and rather grave professor, in a smooth drab

Benjamin and broad-brimmed beaver, cast many a curious

sidelong glance at him, evidently suspecting that all was

not right with the upper story, but preserved perfect

politeness. The poet was, however, discovered by the captain

of the vessel in which we crossed the Channel;--and a

perilous passage it was, chiefly in consequence of the

unceasing tumblers in which this worthy kept drinking his

health."

Before leaving Edinburgh, Scott had settled in his mind the plan of

Paul's Letters; for on that same day, his agent, John Ballantyne,

addressed the following letter, from his marine villa near Newhaven:--

TO MESSRS. CONSTABLE & CO.

TRINITY, 27th July, 1815.

DEAR SIRS,--Mr. Scott left town to-day for the Continent. He

proposes writing from thence a series of letters on a

peculiar plan, varied in matter and style, and to different

supposititious correspondents.

The work is to form a demy 8vo volume of twenty-two sheets,

to sell at 12s. It is to be begun immediately on his arrival

in France, and to be published, if possible, the second week

of September, when he proposes to return.

{p.044} We print 3000 of this, and I am empowered to offer

you one third of the edition, Messrs. Longman & Co. and Mr.

Murray having each the same share: the terms, twelve months'

acceptance for paper and print, and half profits at six

months, granted now as under. The over copies will pay the

charge for advertising, I am, etc.,

John BALLANTYNE.

_Charge_--

22 sheets printing,--£3 15 0 £82 10 0

145 reams demy, -- 1 10 0 217 10 0

---------

£300 0 0

3000 at 8s. £1200 0 0

Cost, 300 0 0

----------

£900 0 0 profit--One half is £450.

Before Scott reached Harwich, he knew that this offer had been

accepted without hesitation; and thenceforth, accordingly, he threw

his daily letters to his wife into the form of communications meant

for an imaginary group, consisting of a spinster sister, a statistical

laird, a rural clergyman of the Presbyterian Kirk, and a brother, a

veteran officer on half-pay. The rank of this last personage

corresponded, however, exactly with that of his own elder brother,

John Scott, who also, like the Major of the book, had served in the

Duke of York's unfortunate campaign of 1797; the sister is only a

slender disguise for his aunt Christian Rutherford, already often

mentioned; Lord Somerville, long President of the Board of

Agriculture, was Paul's laird; and the shrewd and unbigoted Dr.

Douglas of Galashiels was his "minister of the gospel." These

epistles, after having been devoured by the little circle at

Abbotsford, were transmitted to Major John Scott, his mother, and Miss

Rutherford, in Edinburgh; from their hands they passed to those of

James Ballantyne and Mr. Erskine, both of whom assured me that the

copy ultimately sent to the press consisted, in great part, of the

identical sheets that {p.045} had successively reached Melrose

through the post. The rest had of course been, as Ballantyne expresses

it, "somewhat cobbled;" but, on the whole, Paul's Letters are to be

considered as a true and faithful journal of this expedition;

insomuch, that I might perhaps content myself, in this place, with a

simple reference to that delightful volume. He found time, however, to

write letters during his absence from Britain, to some others of his

friends; and a specimen or two of these may interest the reader. I

have also gathered, from the companions of the journey, a few more

particulars, which Scott's modesty withheld him from recording; and

some trivial circumstances which occur to me, from recollection of his

own conversation, may also be acceptable.

But I hope that, if the reader has not perused Paul's Letters

recently, he will refresh his memory, before he proceeds further, by

bestowing an hour on that genuine fragment of the author's

autobiography. He is now, unless he had the advantage of Scott's

personal familiarity, much better acquainted with the man than he

could have been before he took up this compilation of his private

correspondence--and especially before he perused the full diary of the

lighthouse yacht in 1814; and a thousand little turns and

circumstances which may have, when he originally read the book, passed

lightly before his eye, will now, I venture to say, possess a warm and

vivid interest, as inimitably characteristic of a departed friend. The

kindest of husbands and fathers never portrayed himself with more

unaffected truth than in this vain effort, if such he really fancied

he was making, to sustain the character of "a cross old bachelor." The

whole man, just as he was, breathes in every line, with all his

compassionate and benevolent sympathy of heart, all his sharpness of

observation, and sober shrewdness of reflection; all his enthusiasm

for nature, for country life, for simple manners and simple pleasures,

mixed up with an equally glowing enthusiasm, at which many may

{p.046} smile, for the tiniest relics of feudal antiquity--and last,

not least, a pulse of physical rapture for the "circumstance of war,"

which bears witness to the blood of _Boltfoot_ and _Fire-the-Braes_.

At Brussels, Scott found the small English garrison left there in

command of Major-General Sir Frederick Adam, the son of his highly

valued friend, the Lord Chief Commissioner. Sir Frederick had been

wounded at Waterloo, and could not as yet mount on horseback; but one

of his aides-de-camp, Captain Campbell, escorted Scott and his party

to the field of battle, on which occasion they were also accompanied

by another old acquaintance of his, Major Pryse Gordon, who being then

on half-pay, happened to be domesticated with his family at Brussels.

Major Gordon has since published two lively volumes of Personal

Memoirs; and Gala bears witness to the fidelity of certain

reminiscences of Scott at Brussels and Waterloo, which occupy one of

the chapters of this work. I shall, therefore, extract the passage:--

"Sir Walter Scott accepted my services to conduct him to

Waterloo: the General's aide-de-camp was also of the party.

He made no secret of his having undertaken to write

something on the battle; and perhaps he took the greater

interest on this account in everything that he saw. Besides,

he had never seen the field of such a conflict; and never

having been before on the Continent, it was all new to his

comprehensive mind. The day was beautiful; and I had the

precaution to send out a couple of saddle-horses, that he

might not be fatigued in walking over the fields, which had

been recently ploughed up. In our rounds we fell in with

Monsieur de Costar, with whom he got into conversation. This

man had attracted so much notice by his pretended story of

being about the person of Napoleon, that he was of too much

importance to be passed by: I did not, indeed, know as much

of this fellow's charlatanism at that time as afterwards,

when I saw him confronted with a blacksmith of La Belle

Alliance, who had been his companion in a hiding-place ten

miles from the field during the whole day; a {p.047} fact

which he could not deny. But he had got up a tale so

plausible and so profitable, that he could afford to bestow

hush-money on the companion of his flight, so that the

imposition was but little known; and strangers continued to

be gulled. He had picked up a good deal of information about

the positions and details of the battle; and, being

naturally a sagacious Walloon, and speaking French pretty

fluently, he became the favorite cicerone, and every lie he

told was taken for gospel. Year after year, until his death

in 1824, he continued his popularity, and raised the price

of his rounds from a couple of francs to five; besides as

much for the hire of a horse, his own property; for he

pretended that the fatigue of walking so many hours was

beyond his powers. It has been said that in this way he

realized every summer a couple of hundred Napoleons.

"When Sir Walter had examined every point of defence and

attack, we adjourned to the 'Original Duke of Wellington' at

Waterloo, to lunch after the fatigues of the ride. Here he

had a crowded levee of peasants, and collected a great many

trophies, from cuirasses down to buttons and bullets. He

picked up himself many little relics, and was fortunate in

purchasing a grand cross of the Legion of Honor. But the

most precious memorial was presented to him by my wife--a

French soldier's book, well stained with blood, and

containing some songs popular in the French army, which he

found so interesting that he introduced versions of them in

his Paul's Letters; of which, he did me the honor to send me

a copy, with a letter, saying, 'that he considered my wife's

gift as the most valuable of all his Waterloo relics.'

"On our return from the field, he kindly passed the evening

with us, and a few friends whom we invited to meet him. He

charmed us with his delightful conversation, and was in

great spirits from the agreeable day he had passed; and with

great good-humor promised to write a stanza in my wife's

album. On the following morning he fulfilled his promise by

contributing some beautiful verses on Hougomont. I put him

into my little library to prevent interruption, as a great

many persons had paraded in the _Parc_ opposite my window to

get a peep of the celebrated man, many having dogged him

from his hotel.

{p.048} "Brussels affords but little worthy of the notice of

such a traveller as the Author of Waverley; but he greatly

admired the splendid tower of the Maison de Ville, and the

ancient sculpture and style of architecture of the buildings

which surround the Grand Place.

"He told us, with great humor, a laughable incident which

had occurred to him at Antwerp. The morning after his

arrival at that city from Holland, he started at an early

hour to visit the tomb of Rubens in the church of St.

Jacques, before his party were up. After wandering about for

some time, without finding the object he had in view, he

determined to make inquiry, and observing a person stalking

about, he addressed him in his best French; but the

stranger, pulling off his hat, very respectfully replied in

the pure Highland accent, 'I'm vary sorry, sir, but I canna

speak onything besides English.'--'This is very unlucky

indeed, Donald,' said Sir Walter, 'but we must help one

another; for, to tell you the truth, I'm not good at any

other tongue but the English, or rather, the Scotch.'--'Oh,

sir, maybe,' replied the Highlander, 'you are a countryman,

and ken my maister Captain Cameron of the 79th, and could

tell me whare he lodges. I'm just cum in, sir, frae a place

they ca' _Machlin_,[18] and ha' forgotten the name of the

captain's quarters; it was something like the

_Laaborer_.'--'I can, I think, help you with this, my

friend,' rejoined Sir Walter. 'There is an inn just opposite

to you' (pointing to the _Hôtel du Grand Laboureur_): 'I

dare say that will be the captain's quarters;' and it was

so. I cannot do justice to the humor with which Sir Walter

recounted this dialogue."[19]

[Footnote 18: Mechlin--the Highlander gave it the

familiar pronunciation of a Scotch village, Mauchline,

celebrated in many of Burns's poems.]

[Footnote 19: See Major Gordon's _Personal Memoirs_

(1830), vol. ii. pp. 325-338.]

The following is the letter which Scott addressed to the Duke of

Buccleuch immediately after seeing the field of Waterloo; and it may

amuse the reader to compare it with Major Gordon's chapter, and with

the writer's own fuller, and, of course, "cobbled" detail, in the

pages of Paul:--

{p.049} TO HIS GRACE THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH, ETC.

MY DEAR LORD DUKE,--I promised to let you hear of my

wanderings, however unimportant; and have now the pleasure

of informing your Grace that I am at this present time an

inhabitant of the Premier Hôtel de Cambrai, after having

been about a week upon the Continent. We landed at Helvoet,

and proceeded to Brussels, by Bergen-op-Zoom and Antwerp,

both of which are very strongly fortified. The ravages of

war are little remarked in a country so rich by nature; but

everything seems at present stationary, or rather

retrograde, where capital is required. The châteaux are

deserted, and going to decay; no new houses are built, and

those of older date are passing rapidly into the possession

of a class inferior to those for whom we must suppose them

to have been built. Even the old gentlewoman of Babylon has

lost much of her splendor, and her robes and pomp are of a

description far subordinate to the costume of her more

magnificent days. The dresses of the priests were worn and

shabby, both at Antwerp and Brussels, and reminded me of the

decayed wardrobe of a bankrupt theatre: yet, though the

gentry and priesthood have suffered, the eternal bounty of

nature has protected the lower ranks against much distress.

The unexampled fertility of the soil gives them all, and

more than they want; and could they but sell the grain which

they raise in the Netherlands, nothing else would be wanting

to render them the richest people (common people, that is to

say) in the world.

On Wednesday last, I rode over the field of Waterloo, now

forever consecrated to immortality. The more ghastly tokens

of the carnage are now removed, the bodies both of men and

horses being either burned or buried; but all the ground is

still torn with the shot and shells, and covered with

cartridges, old hats, and shoes, and various relics of the

fray which the peasants have not {p.050} thought worth

removing. Besides, at Waterloo and all the hamlets in the

vicinage, there is a mart established for cuirasses; for the

eagles worn by the imperial guard on their caps; for

casques, swords, carabines, and similar articles. I have

bought two handsome cuirasses, and intend them, one for

Bowhill, and one for Abbotsford, if I can get them safe

over, which Major Pryse Gordon has promised to manage for

me. I have also, for your Grace, one of the little

memorandum-books, which I picked up on the field, in which

every French soldier was obliged to enter his receipts and

expenditure, his services, and even his punishments. The

field was covered with fragments of these records. I also

got a good MS. collection of French songs, probably the work

of some young officer, and a croix of the Legion of Honor. I

enclose, under another cover, a sketch of the battle, made

at Brussels. It is not, I understand, strictly accurate; but

sufficiently so to give a good notion of what took place. In

fact, it would require twenty separate plans to give an idea

of the battle at its various stages. The front, upon which

the armies engaged, does not exceed a long mile. Our line,

indeed, originally extended half a mile farther towards the

village of Brain-la-Leude; but as the French indicated no

disposition to attack in that direction, the troops which

occupied this space were gradually concentrated by Lord

Wellington, and made to advance till they had reached

Hougomont--a sort of château, with a garden and wood

attached to it, which was powerfully and effectually

maintained by the Guards during the action. This place was

particularly interesting. It was a quiet-looking gentleman's

house, which had been burnt by the French shells. The

defenders, burnt out of the house itself, betook themselves

to the little garden, where, breaking loopholes through the

brick walls, they kept up a most destructive fire on the

assailants, who had possessed themselves of a little wood

which surrounds the villa on one side. In this spot vast

numbers {p.051} had fallen; and, being hastily buried, the

smell is most offensive at this moment. Indeed, I felt the

same annoyance in many parts of the field; and, did I live

near the spot, I should be anxious about the diseases which

this steaming carnage might occasion. The rest of the

ground, excepting this château, and a farmhouse called La

Hay Sainte, early taken, and long held, by the French,

because it was too close under the brow of the descent on

which our artillery was placed to admit of the pieces being

depressed so as to play into it,--the rest of the ground, I

say, is quite open, and lies between two ridges, one of

which (Mont St. Jean) was constantly occupied by the

English; the other, upon which is the farm of La Belle

Alliance, was the position of the French. The slopes between

are gentle and varied; the ground everywhere practicable for

cavalry, as was well experienced on that memorable day. The

cuirassiers, despite their arms of proof, were quite

inferior to our heavy dragoons. The meeting of the two

bodies occasioned a noise, not unaptly compared to the

tinkering and hammering of a smith's shop. Generally the

cuirassiers came on stooping their heads very low, and

giving point; the British frequently struck away their

casques while they were in this position, and then laid at

the bare head. Officers and soldiers all fought hand to hand

without distinction; and many of the former owed their life

to dexterity at their weapon, and personal strength of body.

Shaw, the milling Life-Guardsman, whom your Grace may

remember among the champions of The Fancy, maintained the

honor of the fist, and killed or disabled upwards of twenty

Frenchmen with his single arm, until he was killed by the

assault of numbers.[20] At one place, where there is a

precipitous sand or gravel pit, the heavy English cavalry

drove many of the cuirassiers over pell-mell, and followed

over themselves, like fox-hunters. The conduct of the

infantry and artillery was equally, {p.052} or, if

possible, more distinguished, and it was all fully

necessary; for, besides that our army was much outnumbered,

a great part of the sum-total were foreigners. Of these, the

Brunswickers and Hanoverians behaved very well; the Belgians

but sorrily enough. On one occasion, when a Belgic regiment

fairly ran off, Lord Wellington rode up to them, and said,

"My lads, you must be a little blown; come, do take your

breath for a moment, and then we'll go back, and try if we

can do a little better;" and he actually carried them back

to the charge. He was, indeed, upon that day, everywhere,

and the soul of everything; nor could less than his personal

endeavors have supported the spirits of the men through a

contest so long, so desperate, and so unequal. At his last

attack, Buonaparte brought up 15,000 of his Guard, who had

never drawn trigger during the day. It was upon their

failure that his hopes abandoned him.

[Footnote 20: The skull of Shaw is now in the Museum at

Abbotsford.]

I spoke long with a shrewd Flemish peasant, called John de

Costar, whom he had seized upon as his guide, and who

remained beside him the whole day, and afterwards

accompanied him in his flight as far as Charleroi. Your

Grace may be sure that I interrogated Mynheer very closely

about what he heard and saw. He guided me to the spot where

Buonaparte remained during the latter part of the action. It

was in the highway from Brussels to Charleroi, where it runs

between two high banks, on each of which was a French

battery. He was pretty well sheltered from the English fire;

and, though many bullets flew over his head, neither he nor

any of his suite were touched. His other stations, during

that day, were still more remote from all danger. The story

of his having an observatory erected for him is a mistake.

There is such a thing, and he repaired to it during the

action; but it was built or erected some months before, for

the purpose of a trigonometrical survey of the country, by

the King of the Netherlands. Bony's last position was nearly

fronting a tree where the Duke of Wellington {p.053} was

stationed; there was not more than a quarter of a mile

between them; but Bony was well sheltered, and the Duke so

much exposed, that the tree is barked in several places by

the cannon-balls levelled at him. As for Bony, De Costar

says he was very cool during the whole day, and even gay. As

the cannon-balls flew over them, De Costar ducked; at which

the Emperor laughed, and told him they would hit him all the

same. At length, about the time he made his grand and last

effort, the fire of the Prussian artillery was heard upon

his right, and the heads of their columns became visible

pressing out of the woods. Aide-de-camp after aide-de-camp

came with the tidings of their advance, to which Bony only

replied, _Attendez, attendez un instant_, until he saw his

troops, _fantassins et cavaliers_, return in disorder from

the attack. He then observed hastily to a general beside

him, _Je crois qu'ils sont mêlés_. The person to whom he

spoke hastily raised the spyglass to his eye; but Bony, whom

the first glance had satisfied of their total discomfiture,

bent his face to the ground, and shook his head twice, his

complexion being then as pale as death. The general then

said something, to which Buonaparte answered, _C'est trop

tard--sauvons nous_. Just at that moment, the allied troops,

cavalry and infantry, appeared in full advance on all hands;

and the Prussians, operating upon the right flank of the

French, were rapidly gaining their rear. Bony, therefore,

was compelled to abandon the high-road, which, besides, was

choked with dead, with baggage, and with cannon; and,

gaining the open country, kept at full gallop, until he

gained, like Johnnie Cope, the van of the flying army. The

marshals followed his example; and it was the most complete

_sauve qui peut_ that can well be imagined. Nevertheless,

the prisoners who were brought into Brussels maintained

their national impudence, and boldly avowed their intention

of sacking the city with every sort of severity. At the same

time they had friends there. {p.054} One man of rank and

wealth went over to Bony during the action, and I saw his

hotel converted into an hospital for wounded soldiers. It

occupied one half of one of the sides of the Place Royale, a

noble square, which your Grace has probably seen. But, in

general, the inhabitants of Brussels were very differently

disposed; and their benevolence to our poor wounded fellows

was unbounded. The difficulty was to prevent them from

killing their guests with kindness, by giving them butcher's

meat and wine during their fever. As I cannot put my letter

into post until we get to Paris, I shall continue it as we

get along.

_12th August, Roye, in Picardy._--I imagine your Grace about

this time to be tolerably well fagged with a hard day on the

moors. If the weather has been as propitious as with us, it

must be delightful. The country through which we have

travelled is most uncommonly fertile, and skirted with

beautiful woods; but its present political situation is so

very uncommon, that I would give the world your Grace had

come over for a fortnight. France may be considered as

neither at peace nor war. Valenciennes, for example, is in a

state of blockade; we passed through the posts of the

allies, all in the utmost state of vigilance, with patrols

of cavalry and vedettes of infantry, up to the very gates,

and two or three batteries were manned and mounted. The

French troops were equally vigilant at the gates, yet made

no objections to our passing through the town. Most of them

had the white cockade, but looked very sulky, and were in

obvious disorder and confusion. They had not yet made their

terms with the King, nor accepted a commander appointed by

him; but as they obviously feel their party desperate, the

soldiers are running from the officers, and the officers

from the soldiers. In fact, the multiplied hosts which pour

into this country, exhibiting all the various dresses and

forms of war which can be imagined, must necessarily render

resistance impracticable. Yet, {p.055} like Satan, these

fellows retain the unconquered propensity to defiance, even

in the midst of defeat and despair. This morning we passed a

great number of the disbanded garrison of Condé, and they

were the most horrid-looking cut-throats I ever saw,

extremely disposed to be very insolent, and only repressed

by the consciousness that all the villages and towns around

are occupied by the allies. They began by crying to us in an

ironical tone, _Vive le Roi_; then followed, _sotto voce,

Sacre B----, Mille diables_, and other graces of French

eloquence. I felt very well pleased that we were armed, and

four in number; and still more so that it was daylight, for

they seemed most mischievous ruffians. As for the appearance

of the country, it is, notwithstanding a fine harvest, most

melancholy. The windows of all the detached houses on the

road are uniformly shut up; and you see few people,

excepting the peasants who are employed in driving the

contributions to maintain the armies. The towns are little

better, having for the most part been partially injured by

shells or by storm, as was the case both of Cambrai and

Peronne. The men look very sulky; and if you speak three

words to a woman, she is sure to fall a-crying. In short,

the _politesse_ and good-humor of this people have fled with

the annihilation of their self-conceit; and they look on you

as if they thought you were laughing at them, or come to

enjoy the triumph of our arms over theirs. Postmasters and

landlords are all the same, and hardly to be propitiated

even by English money, although they charge us about three

times as much as they durst do to their countryfolks. As for

the Prussians, a party of cavalry dined at our hotel at

Mons, eat and drank of the best the poor devils had left to

give, called for their horses, and laughed in the face of

the landlord when he offered his bill, telling him they

should pay as they came back. The English, they say, have

always paid honorably, and upon these they indemnify

themselves. It is impossible to _marchander_, for if

{p.056} you object, the poor landlady begins to cry, and

tells you she will accept whatever _your lordship_ pleases,

but that she is almost ruined and bankrupt, etc., etc., etc.

This is a long stupid letter, but I will endeavor to send a

better from Paris. Ever your Grace's truly obliged,

Walter SCOTT.

The only letter which Scott addressed to Joanna Baillie, while in

Paris, goes over partly the same ground: I transcribe the rest.

PARIS, 6th September, 1815.

MY DEAR FRIEND,--I owe you a long letter, but my late

travels and the date of this epistle will be a tolerable

plea for your indulgence. The truth is, I became very

restless after the battle of Waterloo, and was only detained

by the necessity of attending a friend's marriage, from

setting off instantly for the Continent. At length, however,

I got away to Brussels, and was on the memorable field of

battle about five weeks after it had been fought....

If our army had been all British, the day would have been

soon decided; but the Duke, or, as they call him here, from

his detestation of all manner of foppery, the _Beau_, had

not above 35,000 British. All this was to be supplied by

treble exertion on the part of our troops. The Duke was

everywhere during the battle; and it was the mercy of Heaven

that protected him, when all his staff had been killed or

wounded round him. I asked him, among many other questions,

if he had seen Buonaparte; he said, "No; but at one time,

from the repeated shouts of _Vive l'Empereur_, I thought he

must be near." This was when John de Costar placed him in

the hollow way. I think, so near as I can judge, there may

at that time have been a quarter of a mile between these two

great generals.

The fate of the French, after this day of decisive appeal,

has been severe enough. There were never people {p.057}

more mortified, more subdued, and apparently more broken in

spirit. They submit with sad civility to the extortions of

the Prussians and the Russians, and avenge themselves at the

expense of the English, whom they charge three prices for

everything, because they are the only people who pay at all.

They are in the right, however, to enforce discipline and

good order, which not only maintains the national character

in the mean time, but will prevent the army from suffering

by habits of indulgence. I question if the Prussians will

soon regain their discipline and habits of hardihood. At

present their powers of eating and drinking, which are

really something preternatural, are exerted to the very

utmost. A thin Prussian boy, whom I sometimes see, eats in

one day as much as three English ploughmen. At daybreak he

roars for chocolate and eggs; about nine he breakfasts more

solemnly, _à la fourchette_, when, besides all the usual

apparatus of an English _déjeuner_, he eats a world of

cutlets, oysters, fruit, etc., and drinks a glass of brandy

and a bottle of champagne. His dinner might serve Gargantua,

at which he gets himself about three parts drunk--a

circumstance which does not prevent the charge upon cold

meat, with tea and chocolate, about six o'clock; and

concluding the whole with an immense supper. Positively the

appetite of this lad reminds one of the Eastern tale of a

man taken out of the sea by a ship's crew, who, in return,

ate up all the provisions of the vessel. He was, I think,

flown away with by a roc; but from what quarter of the

heavens the French are to look for deliverance from these

devourers, I cannot presume to guess.

The needless wreck and ruin which they make in the houses

adds much to the inconvenience of their presence. Most of

the châteaux, where the Prussians are quartered, are what is

technically called _rumped_, that is to say, plundered out

and out. In the fine château of Montmorency, for instance,

the most splendid apartments, {p.058} highly ornamented

with gilding and carving, were converted into barracks for

the dirtiest and most savage-looking hussars I have yet

seen. Imagine the work these fellows make with velvet

hangings and embroidery. I saw one hag boiling her

camp-kettle with part of a picture frame; the picture itself

has probably gone to Prussia. With all this greediness and

love of mischief, the Prussians are not bloodthirsty; and

their utmost violence seldom exceeds a blow or two with the

flat of the sabre. They are also very civil to the women,

and in both respects behave much better than the French did

in their country; but they follow the bad example quite

close enough for the sake of humanity and of discipline. As

for our people, they live in a most orderly and regular

manner. All the young men pique themselves on imitating the

Duke of Wellington in _nonchalance_ and coolness of manner;

so they wander about everywhere, with their hands in the

pockets of their long waistcoats, or cantering upon Cossack

ponies, staring and whistling, and trotting to and fro, as

if all Paris was theirs. The French hate them sufficiently

for the _hauteur_ of their manner and pretensions, but the

grounds of dislike against us are drowned in the actual

detestation afforded by the other powers.

This morning I saw a grand military spectacle--about 20,000

Russians pass in review before all the Kings and Dominations

who are now resident at Paris. The Emperor, King of Prussia,

Duke of Wellington, with their numerous and brilliant

attendance of generals, staff-officers, etc., were in the

centre of what is called the Place Louis Quinze, almost on

the very spot where Louis XVI. was beheaded. A very long

avenue, which faces the station where they were placed, was

like a glowing furnace, so fiercely were the sunbeams

reflected from the arms of the host by which it was filled.

A body of Cossacks kept the ground with their pikes, and, by

their wild appearance, added to the singularity of the

scene. On one {p.059} hand was the extended line of the

Tuileries, seen through the gardens and the rows of

orange-trees; on the other, the long column of troops

advancing to the music. Behind was a long colonnade, forming

the front to the palace, where the Chamber of

Representatives are to hold their sittings; and in front of

the monarchs was a superb row of buildings, on which you

distinguish the bronze pillar erected by Napoleon to

commemorate his victories over Russia, Prussia, and Austria,

whose princes were now reviewing their victorious armies in

what was so lately his capital. Your fancy, my dear friend,

will anticipate, better than I can express, the thousand

sentiments which arose in my mind from witnessing such a

splendid scene, in a spot connected with such various

associations. It may give you some idea of the feelings of

the French--once so fond of _spectacles_--to know that, I

think, there were not a hundred of that nation looking on.

Yet this country will soon recover the actual losses she has

sustained, for never was there a soil so blessed by nature,

or so rich in corn, wine, and oil, and in the animated

industry of its inhabitants. France is at present the fabled

giant, struggling, or rather lying supine, under the load of

mountains which have been precipitated on her; but she is

not, and cannot be crushed. Remove the incumbent weight of

600,000 or 700,000 foreigners, and she will soon stand

upright--happy, if experience shall have taught her to be

contented to exert her natural strength only for her own

protection, and not for the annoyance of her neighbors. I am

cut short in my lucubrations by an opportunity to send this

letter with Lord Castlereagh's despatches, which is of less

consequence, as I will endeavor to see you in passing

through London. I leave this city for Dieppe on Saturday,

but I intend to go round by Harfleur, if possible.

Ever your truly obliged and affectionate

Walter SCOTT.

{p.060} "Paul" modestly acknowledges, in his last letter, the

personal attentions which he received, while in Paris, from Lords

Cathcart, Aberdeen, and Castlereagh; and hints that, through their

intervention, he had witnessed several of the splendid _fêtes_ given

by the Duke of Wellington, where he saw half the crowned heads of

Europe grouped among the gallant soldiers who had cut a way for them

to the guilty capital of France. Scott's reception, however, had been

distinguished to a degree of which Paul's language gives no notion.

The Noble Lords above named welcomed him with cordial satisfaction;

and the Duke of Wellington, to whom he was first presented by Sir John

Malcolm, treated him then, and ever afterwards, with a kindness and

confidence, which, I have often heard him say, he considered as "the

highest distinction of his life." He used to tell, with great effect,

the circumstances of his introduction to the Emperor Alexander, at a

dinner given by the Earl of Cathcart. Scott appeared, on that

occasion, in the blue and red dress of the Selkirkshire Lieutenancy;

and the Czar's first question, glancing at his lameness, was, "In what

affair were you wounded?" Scott signified that he suffered from a

natural infirmity; upon which the Emperor said, "I thought Lord

Cathcart mentioned that you had served." Scott observed that the Earl

looked a little embarrassed at this, and promptly answered, "Oh yes;

in a certain sense I have served--that is, in the yeomanry cavalry; a

home force resembling the Landwehr, or Landsturm."--"Under what

commander?"--"Sous M. le Chevalier Rae."--"Were you ever

engaged?"--"In some slight actions--such as the battle of the Cross

Causeway and the affair of Moredun-Mill."--"This," says Mr. Pringle of

Whytbank, "was, as he saw in Lord Cathcart's face, quite sufficient,

so he managed to turn the conversation to some other subject." It was

at the same dinner that he first met Platoff,[21] who {p.061} seemed

to take a great fancy to him, though, adds my friend, "I really don't

think they had any common language to converse in." Next day, however,

when Pringle and Scott were walking together in the Rue de la Paix,

the Hetman happened to come up, cantering with some of his Cossacks;

as soon as he saw Scott, he jumped off his horse, leaving it to the

Pulk, and, running up to him, kissed him on each side of the cheek

with extraordinary demonstrations of affection--and then made him

understand, through an aide-de-camp, that he wished him to join his

staff at the next great review, when he would take care to mount him

on the gentlest of his Ukraine horses.

[Footnote 21: Scott acknowledges, in a note to _St.

Ronan's Well_ (chap. xv.), that he took from Platoff

this portrait of Mr. Touchwood: "His face, which at the

distance of a yard or two seemed hale and smooth,

appeared, when closely examined, to be seamed with a

million of wrinkles, crossing each other in every

direction possible, but as fine as if drawn by the point

of a very small needle." Thus did every little

peculiarity remain treasured in his memory, to be used

in due time for giving the air of minute reality to some

imaginary personage.]

It will seem less surprising that Scott should have been honored with

much attention by the leading soldiers and statesmen of Germany then

in Paris. The fame of his poetry had already been established for some

years in that country. Yet it may be doubted whether Blücher had heard

of Marmion any more than Platoff; and old Blücher struck Scott's

fellow-travellers as taking more interest in him than any foreign

general, except only the Hetman.

A striking passage in Paul's 10th letter indicates the high notion

which Scott had formed of the personal qualities of the Prince of

Orange. After depicting, with almost prophetic accuracy, the dangers

to which the then recent union of Holland and Belgium must be exposed,

he concludes with expressing his hope that the firmness and sagacity

of the King of the Netherlands, and the admiration which his heir's

character and bearing had already excited among all, even Belgian

observers, might {p.062} ultimately prove effective in redeeming this

difficult experiment from the usual failure of "_arrondissements_,

indemnities, and all the other terms of modern date, under sanction of

which cities and districts, and even kingdoms, have been passed from

one government to another, as the property of lands or stock is

transferred by a bargain between private parties."

It is not less curious to compare, with the subsequent course of

affairs in France, the following brief hint in Paul's 16th letter:

"The general rallying point of the _Libéralistes_ is an avowed dislike

to the present monarch and his immediate connections. They will

sacrifice, they pretend, so much to the general inclinations of

Europe, as to select a king from the Bourbon race; but he must be one

of their own choosing, and the Duke of Orleans is most familiar in

their mouths." Thus, in its very bud, had his eye detected the

_conjuration de quinze ans!_

Among the gay parties of this festive period, Scott mentioned with

special pleasure one fine day given to an excursion to Ermenonville,

under the auspices of Lady Castlereagh. The company was a large one,

including most of the distinguished personages whom I have been

naming, and they dined _al fresco_ among the scenes of Rousseau's

retirement, but in a fashion less accordant with the spirit of his

_rêveries d'un promeneur solitaire_, than with the song which

commemorates some earlier tenants of that delicious valley,--

"La belle Gabrielle

Étoit dans ces lieux--

Et le souvenir d'elle

Nous rend heureux," etc.

At some stage of this merry day's proceedings, the ladies got tired of

walking, and one of Lord Castlereagh's young diplomatists was

despatched into a village in quest of donkeys for their accommodation.

The _attaché_ returned by and by with a face of disappointment,

complaining that the charge the people made was so extravagant,

{p.063} he could not think of yielding to the extortion. "_Marshal

Forwards_" said nothing, but nodded to an aide-de-camp. They had

passed a Prussian picket a little while before;--three times the

requisite number of donkeys appeared presently, driven before

half-a-dozen hussars, who were followed by the screaming population of

the refractory hamlet; and "an angry man was Blücher," said Scott,

"when Lord Castlereagh condescended to go among them, all smiles, and

sent them back with more Napoleons than perhaps the fee-simple of the

whole stud was worth."

Another evening of more peaceful enjoyment has left a better record.

But I need not quote here the lines on Saint Cloud.[22] They were

sent, on the 16th of August, to the late Lady Alvanley, with whom and

her daughters he spent much of his time while in Paris.

[Footnote 22: See _Poetical Works_ (Edin. Ed.), vol. xi.

p. 295 [Cambridge Ed. p. 420].]

As yet, the literary reputation of Scott had made but little way among

the French nation; but some few of their eminent men vied even with

the enthusiastic Germans in their courteous and unwearied attentions

to him. The venerable _Chevalier_, in particular, seemed anxious to

embrace every opportunity of acting as his cicerone; and many mornings

were spent in exploring, under his guidance, the most remarkable

scenes and objects of historical and antiquarian interest both in

Paris and its neighborhood. He several times also entertained Scott

and his young companions at dinner; but the last of those dinners was

thoroughly poisoned by a preliminary circumstance. The poet, on

entering the saloon, was presented to a stranger, whose physiognomy

struck him as the most hideous he had ever seen; nor was his disgust

lessened, when he found, a few minutes afterwards, that he had

undergone the _accolade_ of David "of the blood-stained brush."

From Paris, Mr. Bruce and Mr. Pringle went on to {p.064} Switzerland,

leaving the poet and Gala to return home together, which they did by

way of Dieppe, Brighton, and London. It was here, on the 14th of

September, that Scott had that last meeting with Lord Byron, alluded

to in his communication to Mr. Moore, already quoted. He carried his

young friend in the morning to call on Lord Byron, who agreed to dine

with them at their hotel, where he met also Charles Mathews and Daniel

Terry. The only survivor of the party[23] has recorded it in his

note-book as the most interesting day he ever spent. "How I did

stare," he says, "at Byron's beautiful pale face, like a

spirit's--good or evil. But he was _bitter_--what a contrast to Scott!

Among other anecdotes of British prowess and spirit, Scott mentioned

that a young gentleman ---- ---- ---- had been awfully shot in the

head while conveying an order from the Duke, and yet staggered on, and

delivered his message when at the point of death. 'Ha!' said Byron, 'I

dare say he could do as well as most people without his head--it was

never of much use to him.' Waterloo did not delight him, probably--and

Scott could talk or think of scarcely anything else."

[Footnote 23: John Scott, Esq., of Gala, died at

Edinburgh, 19th April, 1840.--(1842.)]

Mathews accompanied them as far as Warwick and Kenilworth, both of

which castles the poet had seen before, but now reëxamined with

particular curiosity. They spent a night at Sheffield; and early next

morning Scott sallied forth to provide himself with a planter's knife

of the most complex contrivance and finished workmanship. Having

secured one to his mind, and which for many years after was his

constant pocket-companion, he wrote his name on a card, "Walter Scott,

Abbotsford," and directed it to be engraved on the handle. On his

mentioning this acquisition at breakfast, young Gala expressed his

desire to equip himself in like fashion, and was directed to the shop

accordingly. When he had {p.065} purchased a similar knife, and

produced his name in turn for the engraver, the master cutler eyed the

signature for a moment, and exclaimed, "John Scott of Gala! Well, I

hope your ticket may serve me in as good stead as another Mr. Scott's

has just done. Upon my word, one of my best men, an honest fellow from

the North, went out of his senses when he saw it--he offered me a

week's work if I would let him keep it to himself--and I took

_Saunders_ at his word." Scott used to talk of this as one of the most

gratifying compliments he ever received in his literary capacity.

Their next halt was at Rokeby; but since Scott had heard from thence,

Mrs. Morritt's illness had made such alarming progress, that the

travellers regretted having obtruded themselves on the scene of

affliction, and resumed their journey early next morning.

Reaching Abbotsford, Scott found with his family his old friend Mr.

Skene of Rubislaw, who had expected him to come home sooner, and James

Ballantyne, who had arrived with a copious budget of bills, calendars,

booksellers' letters, and proof sheets. From each of these visitors'

_memoranda_ I now extract an anecdote. Mr. Skene's is of a small

enough matter, but still it places the man so completely before

myself, that I am glad he thought it worth setting down.

"During Scott's absence," says his friend, "his wife had had

the tiny drawing-room of the cottage fitted up with new

chintz furniture,--everything had been set out in the best

style,--and she and her girls had been looking forward to

the pleasure which they supposed the little surprise of the

arrangements would give him. He was received in the spruce

fresh room, set himself comfortably down in the chair

prepared for him, and remained in the full enjoyment of his

own fireside, and a return to his family circle, without the

least consciousness that any change had taken place--until,

at length, Mrs. Scott's patience could hold out no longer,

and his attention was expressly called to it. The vexation

he showed at having caused {p.066} such a disappointment,

struck me as amiably characteristic--and in the course of

the evening he every now and then threw out some word of

admiration to reconsole _mamma_."

Ballantyne's note of their next morning's conference is in these

terms:--

"He had just been reviewing a pageant of emperors and kings,

which seemed, like another Field of the Cloth of Gold, to

have been got up to realize before his eyes some of his own

splendid descriptions. I begged him to tell me what was the

general impression left on his mind. He answered, that he

might now say he had seen and conversed with all classes of

society, from the palace to the cottage, and including every

conceivable shade of science and ignorance--but that he had

never felt awed or abashed except in the presence of one

man--the Duke of Wellington. I expressed some surprise. He

said I ought not, for that the Duke of Wellington possessed

every one mighty quality of the mind in a higher degree than

any other man did, or had ever done. He said he beheld in

him a great soldier and a great statesman--the greatest of

each. When it was suggested that the Duke, on his part, saw

before him a great poet and novelist, he smiled, and said,

'What would the Duke of Wellington think of a few _bits of

novels_, which perhaps he had never read, and for which the

strong probability is that he would not care a sixpence if

he had?' You are not" (adds Ballantyne) "to suppose that he

looked either sheepish or embarrassed in the presence of the

Duke--indeed you well know that he did not, and could not do

so; but the feeling, qualified and modified as I have

described it, unquestionably did exist to a certain extent.

Its origin forms a curious moral problem; and may probably

be traced to a secret consciousness, which he might not

himself advert to, that the Duke, however great as a soldier

and statesman, was so defective in imagination as to be

incapable of appreciating that which had formed the charm of

his own life, as well as of his works."

It is proper to add to Mr. Ballantyne's solution of his "curious moral

problem," that he was in his latter days a strenuous opponent of the

Duke of Wellington's politics; {p.067} to which circumstance he

ascribes, in these same _memoranda_, the only coolness that ever

occurred between him and Scott. I need hardly repeat, what has been

already distinctly stated more than once, that Scott never considered

any amount of literary distinction as entitled to be spoken of in the

same breath with mastery in the higher departments of practical

life--least of all, with the glory of a first-rate captain. To have

done things worthy to be written was in his eyes a dignity to which no

man made any approach, who had only written things worthy to be read.

He on two occasions, which I can never forget, betrayed painful

uneasiness when his works were alluded to as reflecting honor on the

age that had produced Watt's improvement of the steam-engine, and the

safety-lamp of Sir Humphry Davy. Such was his modest creed--but from

all I ever saw or heard of his intercourse with the Duke of

Wellington, I am not disposed to believe that he partook it with the

only man in whose presence he ever felt awe and abashment.[24]

[Footnote 24: I think it very probable that Scott had

his own first interview with the Duke of Wellington in

his mind when he described the introduction of Roland

Græme to the Regent Murray, in the novel of _The Abbot_,

chap. xviii.:--"Such was the personage before whom

Roland Græme now presented himself with a feeling of

breathless awe, very different from the usual boldness

and vivacity of his temper. In fact, he was, from

education and nature, ... much more easily controlled by

the moral superiority arising from the elevated talents

and renown of those with whom he conversed, than by

pretensions founded only on rank or external show. He

might have braved with indifference the presence of an

Earl merely distinguished by his belt and coronet; but

he felt overawed in that of the eminent soldier and

statesman, the wielder of a nation's power, and the

leader of her armies."]

A charming page in Mr. Washington Irving's Abbotsford and Newstead

affords us another anecdote connected with this return from Paris. Two

years after this time, when the amiable American visited Scott, he

walked with him to a quarry, where his people were at work.

"The face of the humblest dependent," he says, "brightened

at his approach--all paused from their labor to have a

pleasant {p.068} 'crack wi' the laird.' Among the rest was

a tall straight old fellow, with a healthful complexion and

silver hairs, and a small round-crowned white hat. He had

been about to shoulder a hod, but paused, and stood looking

at Scott with a slight sparkling of his blue eye as if

waiting his turn; for the old fellow knew he was a favorite.

Scott accosted him in an affable tone, and asked for a pinch

of snuff. The old man drew forth a horn snuff-box. 'Hoot

man,' said Scott, 'not that old mull. Where's the bonnie

French one that I brought you from Paris?'--'Troth, your

honor,' replied the old fellow, 'sic a mull as that is nae

for week-days.' On leaving the quarry, Scott informed me,

that, when absent at Paris, he had purchased several

trifling articles as presents for his dependents, and, among

others, the gay snuff-box in question, which was so

carefully reserved for Sundays by the veteran. 'It was not

so much the value of the gifts,' said he, 'that pleased

them, as the idea that the laird should think of them when

so far away.'"

One more incident of this return--it was told to me by himself, some

years afterwards, with gravity, and even sadness. "The last of my

chargers," he said, "was a high-spirited and very handsome one, by

name Daisy, all over white, without a speck, and with such a mane as

Rubens delighted to paint. He had, among other good qualities, one

always particularly valuable in my case, that of standing like a rock

to be mounted. When he was brought to the door, after I came home from

the Continent, instead of signifying, by the usual tokens, that he was

pleased to see his master, he looked askant at me like a devil; and

when I put my foot in the stirrup, he reared bolt upright, and I fell

to the ground rather awkwardly. The experiment was repeated twice or

thrice, always with the same result. It occurred to me that he might

have taken some capricious dislike to my dress; and Tom Purdie, who

always falls heir to the white hat and green jacket, and so forth,

when Mrs. Scott has made me discard a set of garments, was sent for,

to try whether these habiliments would produce him a similar reception

from his old friend Daisy: but Daisy {p.069} allowed Tom to back him

with all manner of gentleness. The thing was inexplicable--but he had

certainly taken some part of my conduct in high dudgeon and disgust;

and after trying him again, at the interval of a week, I was obliged

to part with Daisy--and wars and rumors of wars being over, I resolved

thenceforth to have done with such dainty blood. I now stick to a good

sober cob." Somebody suggested that Daisy might have considered

himself as ill-used, by being left at home when _the laird_ went on

his journey. "Ay," said he, "these creatures have many thoughts of

their own, no doubt, that we can never penetrate." Then, laughing,

"Troth," said he, "maybe some bird had whispered Daisy that I had been

to see the grand reviews at Paris on a little scrag of a Cossack,

while my own gallant trooper was left behind bearing Peter and the

post-bag to Melrose."

A few letters, written shortly after this return to Abbotsford, will,

among other things, show with what zeal he at once resumed his

literary industry, if indeed that can be said to have been at all

interrupted by a journey, in the course of which a great part of

Paul's narrative, and also of the poem of The Field of Waterloo, must

have been composed.

TO J. B. S. MORRITT, ESQ., M. P., ROKEBY PARK.

ABBOTSFORD, 2d October, 1815.

MY DEAR MORRITT,--Few things could have given me more real

pain, than to see Mrs. Morritt under such severe suffering,

and the misery you sustain in witnessing it. Yet let us

trust in the goodness of Providence, which restored the

health so deservedly dear to you, from as great a state of

depression upon a former occasion. Our visit was indeed a

melancholy one, and, I fear, added to your distress, when,

God knows, it required no addition.--The contrast of this

quiet bird's-nest of a place, with the late scene of

confusion and military splendor which I have witnessed, is

something of a stunning {p.070} nature--and, for the first

five or six days, I have been content to fold my hands, and

saunter up and down in a sort of indolent and stupefied

tranquillity, my only attempt at occupation having gone no

farther than pruning a young tree now and then. Yesterday,

however, and to-day, I began, from necessity, to prune

verses, and have been correcting proofs of my little attempt

at a poem on Waterloo. It will be out this week, and you

shall have a copy by the Carlisle coach, which pray judge

favorably, and remember it is not always the grandest

actions which are best adapted for the arts of poetry and

painting. I believe I shall give offence to my old friends

the Whigs, by not condoling with Buonaparte. Since his

sentence of transportation, he has begun to look wonderfully

comely in their eyes. I would they had hanged him, that he

might have died a perfect Adonis. Every reasonable creature

must think the Ministers would have deserved the cord

themselves, if they had left him in a condition again to

cost us the loss of 10,000 of our best and bravest, besides

thirty millions of good money. The very threats and frights

which he has given the well-meaning people of this realm

(myself included), deserved no less a punishment than

banishment, since the "putting in bodily fear" makes so

material a part of every criminal indictment. But, no doubt,

we shall see Ministers attacked for their want of generosity

to a fallen enemy, by the same party who last year, with

better grounds, assailed them for having left him in a

situation again to disturb the tranquillity of Europe.--My

young friend Gala has left me, after a short visit to

Abbotsford. He is my nearest (conversible) neighbor, and I

promise myself much comfort in him, as he has a turn both

for the sciences and for the arts, rather uncommon among our

young Scotch lairds. He was delighted with Rokeby and its

lord, though he saw both at so melancholy a period, and

endured, not only with good-humor but with sympathy, the

stupidity of his fellow-traveller, who was not by {p.071}

any means _dans son brillant_ for some time after leaving

you.

We visited Corby Castle on our return to Scotland, which

remains, in point of situation, as beautiful as when its

walks were celebrated by David Hume, in the only rhymes he

was ever known to be guilty of. Here they are, from a pane

of glass in an inn at Carlisle:--

"Here chicks in eggs for breakfast sprawl,

Here godless boys God's glories squall,

Here Scotchmen's heads do guard the wall,

But Corby's walks atone for all."

Would it not be a good quiz to advertise _The Poetical Works

of David Hume_, with notes, critical, historical, and so

forth--with an historical inquiry into the use of eggs for

breakfast, a physical discussion on the causes of their

being addled; a history of the English Church music, and of

the choir of Carlisle in particular; a full account of the

affair of 1745, with the trials, last speeches, and so

forth, of the poor _plaids_ who were strapped up at

Carlisle; and, lastly, a full and particular description of

Corby, with the genealogy of every family who ever possessed

it? I think, even without more than the usual waste of

margin, the Poems of David would make a decent

twelve-shilling touch. I shall think about it when I have

exhausted mine own _century of inventions_.

I do not know whether it is perverseness of state, or old

associations, but an excellent and very handsome modern

house, which Mr. Howard has lately built at Corby, does not,

in my mind, assimilate so well with the scenery as the old

irregular monastic hall, with its weather-beaten and antique

appearance, which I remember there some years ago.

Out of my Field of Waterloo has sprung an odd wild sort of

thing, which I intend to finish separately, and call it The

Dance of Death.[25] These matters take up my {p.072} time

so much, that I must bid you adieu for the present. Besides,

I am summoned to attend a grand _chasse_, and I see the

children are all mounted upon the ponies. By the way, Walter

promises to be a gallant horseman. Ever most truly yours,

Walter SCOTT.

[Footnote 25: This was published in the _Edinburgh

Annual Register_ in 1815.--See _Poetical Works_ (Ed.

1834), vol. xi. p. 297 [Cambridge Ed. p. 421].]

I shall close this chapter with a transcript of some _Notes_ on the

proof sheets of The Field of Waterloo. John Ballantyne being at

Abbotsford on the 3d of October, his brother the printer addressed the

packet containing the sheets to him. John appears to have considered

James's observations on the margin before Scott saw them; and the

record of the style in which the Poet repelled, or yielded to, his

critics, will at all events illustrate his habitual good-nature.

John Ballantyne writes on the fly-leaf of the proofs, to his

confidential clerk: "Mr. Hodgson, I beg these sheets and all the MS.

may be carefully preserved just as they stand, and put in my father's

desk. J. B."

James prefaces his animadversions with this quotation:--

"Cut deep and spare not.--_Penruddock._"

The _Notes_ are these:--

STANZA I.--"Fair Brussels, thou art far behind."

_James Ballantyne._--I do not like this line. It is tame, and the

phrase "far behind," has, to my feeling, some associated vulgarity.

_Scott._--Stet.

STANZA II.--"Let not _the_ stranger with disdain

_The_ architecture view."

_James._--These two words are cacophonous. Would not _its_ do?

_Scott._--Th. is a bad sound. Ts. a much worse. Read _their_.

STANZA IV.--"A stranger might reply."

_James._--My objection to this is probably fantastical, and I state

it only because, from the first moment to the last, it has always

made me boggle. I don't like a _stranger_--Query, "The

questioned"--The "spectator"--"gazer," etc.

_Scott._--_Stranger_ is appropriate--it means stranger to the

circumstances.

{p.073} STANZA VI.--_James._--You had changed "garner-house

profound," which I think quite admirable, to "garner under ground,"

which I think quite otherways. I have presumed not to make the

change--must I?

_Scott._--I acquiesce, but with doubts; _profound_ sounds affected.

STANZA VIII.--"The deadly tug of war at length

Must limits find in human strength,

And _cease_ when these are passed.

Vain hope!" etc.

_James._--I must needs repeat, that the deadly tug _did_ cease in

the case supposed. It lasted long--very long; but, when the limits

of resistance, of human strength, were past--that is, after they had

fought for ten hours, then the deadly tug _did_ cease. Therefore the

"hope" was not "vain."

_Scott._--I answer, it did _not_,--because the observation relates

to the strength of those actually engaged, and when _their_ strength

was exhausted, other squadrons were brought up. Suppose you saw two

lawyers scolding at the bar, you might say this must have an

end--human lungs cannot hold out--but, if the debate were continued

by the senior counsel, your well-grounded expectations would be

disappointed--"Cousin, thou wert not wont to be so dull!"--

IBID.--"Nor ceased the _intermitted_ shot."

_James._--Mr. Erskine contends that "intermitted" is redundant.

_Scott._--"Nor ceased the _storm of shell and shot_."

STANZA X.--"---- Never shall our country say

We gave one inch of ground away,

_When battling_ for her right."

_James._--_In conflict?_

_John B._--_Warring?_ I am afraid _battling_ must stand.

_Scott._--All worse than the text.

STANZA XI.--"Peal'd wildly the imperial name."

_James._--I submit with diffidence whether this be not a somewhat

tame conclusion to so very animated a stanza? And, at any rate, you

will observe, that as it stands, you have no rhyme whatever to "The

Cohort eagles _fly_."--You have no rhyme to _fly_. _Flew_ and _fly_,

also, are perhaps too near, considering that each word closes a line

of the same sort. I don't well like "_Thus_ in a torrent," either.

If it were, "In one broad torrent," etc., it strikes me that it

would be more spirited.

_Scott._--Granted as to most of these observations--Read, "in one

_dark_ torrent broad and strong," etc.--The "imperial name" is

_true_, therefore must stand.

STANZA XII.--"Nor was one forward footstep _stopped_."

_James._--This staggering word was intended, I presume, but I don't

like it.

{p.074} _Scott._--Granted. Read _staid_, etc.

IBID.--"Down were the eagle banners sent,

Down, down the horse and horsemen went."

_James._--This is very spirited and very fine; but it is

unquestionably liable to the charge of being very nearly a direct

repetition of yourself. See _Lord of the Isles_, Canto vi. Stanza

24:--

"_Down! down!_ in headlong overthrow,

_Horseman and horse_, the foremost go," etc.

This passage is at once so striking and so recent, that its close

similarity to the present, if not indeed its identity, must strike

every reader; and really, to borrow from one's self is hardly much

better than to borrow from one's neighbors. And yet again, a few lines

lower--

"As hammers on the _anvils_ reel,

Against the cuirass _clangs_ the steel."

See _Lady of the Lake_, Canto vi. Stanza 18:--

"I heard the broadswords' deadly _clang_,

As if an hundred _anvils_ rang."

Here is precisely the same image, in very nearly the same words.

_Scott._--I have altered the expression, but made a note, which, I

think, will vindicate my retaining the simile.

STANZA XIII.--"As their own Ocean-rocks hold _stance_."

_John._--I do not know such an English word as _stance_.

_Scott._--Then we'll make it one for the _nance_.

IBID.--"And _newer_ standards fly."

_James._--I don't like _newer_.

_Scott._--"And _other_ standards fly."

IBID.--"Or can thy memory fail to _quote_,

Heard to thy cost the vengeful note."

_James._--Would to God you would alter this _quote_!

_John._--Would to God _I_ could!--I certainly should.--

_Scott._--"Or can thy memory fail to know,

Heard oft before in hour of woe."

Or--

"Or dwells not in thy memory still,

Heard frequent in thine hour of ill."

STANZA XV.--"Wrung forth by pride, _regret_, and shame."

_James._--I have ventured to submit to your choice--

"Wrung forth by pride, _and rage_, and shame."

_Regret_ appearing a faint epithet amidst such a combination of

bitter feelings.

_Scott._--Granted.

{p.075} IBID.--"So mingle banner, wain, and gun,

Where in one tide of horror run

The warriors," etc.

_James._--In the first place, warriors _running_ in a tide is a

clashing metaphor; in the second, the warriors _running_ at all is a

little homely. It is true, no doubt; but really running is little

better than scampering. For these causes, one or both, I think the

lines should be altered.

_Scott._--You are wrong in one respect. A tide is always said to

_run_,--but I thought of the tide without attending to the

equivoque, which must be altered. Read,--

"Where the tumultuous flight rolls on."

STANZA XVI.--"---- found _gallant_ grave."

_James._--This is surely a singular epithet to a grave. I think the

whole of this stanza eminently fine; and, in particular, the

conclusion.

_Scott._--"---- found _soldier's_ grave." ----

STANZA XXI.--"_Redoubted_ Picton's soul of fire."

_James._--From long association, this epithet strikes me as

conveying a semi-ludicrous idea.

_Scott._--It is here appropriate, and your objection seems merely

personal to your own association.

IBID.--"Through his friends' heart to _wound_ his own."

_James._--Quære--_Pierce_, or rather _stab_--_wound_ is faint.

_Scott._--"Pierce."

STANZA XXII.--"Forgive, _brave fallen_, the imperfect lay."

_James._--Don't like "brave fallen" at all; nor "appropriate

praise," three lines after. The latter in particular is prosaic.

_Scott._--"Forgive, _brave dead_,"

---- "_The dear-earned praise._"

{p.076} CHAPTER XXXVI.

Field of Waterloo Published. -- Revision of Paul's Letters,

etc. -- Quarrel and Reconciliation with Hogg. -- Football

Match at Carterhaugh. -- Songs on the Banner of Buccleuch.

-- Dinner at Bowhill. -- Design for a Piece of Plate to the

Sutors of Selkirk. -- Letters to the Duke of Buccleuch,

Joanna Baillie, and Mr. Morritt.

1815.

The poem of The Field of Waterloo was published before the end of

October; the profits of the first edition being the author's

contribution to the fund raised for the relief of the widows and

children of the soldiers slain in the battle. This piece appears to

have disappointed those most disposed to sympathize with the author's

views and feelings. The descent is indeed heavy from his Bannockburn

to his Waterloo: the presence, or all but visible reality of what his

dreams cherished, seems to have overawed his imagination, and tamed it

into a weak pomposity of movement. The burst of pure native enthusiasm

upon the _Scottish_ heroes that fell around the Duke of Wellington's

person bears, however, the broadest marks of the "Mighty Minstrel:"--

"Saw gallant Miller's fading eye

Still bent where Albyn's standards fly,

And Cameron, in the shock of steel,

Die like the offspring of Lochiel," etc.;--

and this is far from being the only redeeming passage. There is one,

indeed, in which he illustrates what he then thought Buonaparte's

poorness of spirit in adversity, {p.077} which always struck me as

preëminently characteristic of Scott's manner of interweaving, both in

prose and verse, the moral energies with analogous natural

description, and combining thought with imagery,--

"Or is thy soul like mountain tide,

That, swelled by winter storm and shower,

Rolls down in turbulence of power,

A torrent fierce and wide;

Reft of these aids, a rill obscure,

Shrinking unnoticed, mean and poor,

Whose channel shows displayed

The wrecks of its impetuous course,

But not one symptom of the force

By which these wrecks were made!"

The poem was the first upon a subject likely to be sufficiently

hackneyed; and, having the advantage of coming out in a small cheap

form--(prudently imitated from Murray's innovation with the tales of

Byron, which was the death-blow to the system of verse in quarto)--it

attained rapidly a measure of circulation above what had been reached

either by Rokeby or The Lord of the Isles.

Meanwhile the revision of Paul's Letters was proceeding; and Scott had

almost immediately on his return to Abbotsford concluded his bargain

for the first edition of a third novel--The Antiquary--to be published

also in the approaching winter. Harold the Dauntless, too, was from

time to time taken up as the amusement of _horæ subsecivæ_. As for

Scott's out-of-doors occupations of that autumn, sufficient light will

be thrown on them by the following letter; from which it is seen that

he had now completed a rather tedious negotiation with another

bonnet-laird, and definitively added the lands of _Kaeside_ to the

original estate of Abbotsford.

TO MISS JOANNA BAILLIE, HAMPSTEAD.

ABBOTSFORD, November 12, 1815.

I have been long in acknowledging your letter, my dear

friend, and yet you have not only been frequent in my

thoughts, as must always be the case, but your name {p.078}

has been of late familiar in my mouth as a household word.

You must know that the pinasters you had the goodness to

send me some time since, which are now fit to be set out of

the nursery, have occupied my mind as to the mode of

disposing of them. Now, mark the event: there is in the

middle of what will soon be a bank of fine young wood, a

certain old gravel-pit, which is the present scene of my

operations. I have caused it to be covered with better

earth, and gently altered with the spade, so as, if

possible, to give it the air of one of those accidental

hollows which the surface of a hill frequently presents.

Having arranged my ground, I intend to plant it all round

with the pinasters, and other varieties of the pine species,

and in the interior I will have a rustic seat, surrounded by

all kinds of evergreen shrubs (laurels in particular), and

all varieties of the holly and cedar, and so forth, and this

is to be called and entitled _Joanna's Bower_. We are

determined in the choice of our ornaments by necessity, for

our ground fronts (in poetic phrase) the rising sun, or, in

common language, looks to the east; and being also on the

north side of the hill--(don't you shiver at the

thought?)--why, to say truth, George Wynnos and I are both

of opinion that nothing but evergreens will flourish there;

but I trust I shall convert a present deformity into a very

pretty little hobby-horsical sort of thing. It will not bear

looking at for years, and that is a pity; but it will so far

resemble the person from whom it takes name, that it is

planted, as she has written, for the benefit as well of

posterity as for the passing generation. Time and I, says

the Spaniard, against any two; and fully confiding in the

proverb, I have just undertaken another grand task. You must

know, I have purchased a large lump of wild land, lying

adjoining to this little property, which greatly more than

doubles my domains. The land is said to be reasonably

bought, and I am almost certain I can turn it to advantage

by a little judicious expenditure; for this {p.079} place

is already allowed to be worth twice what it cost me; and

our people here think so little of planting, and do it so

carelessly, that they stare with astonishment at the

alteration which well-planted woods make on the face of a

country. There is, besides, a very great temptation, from

the land running to within a quarter of a mile of a very

sweet wild sheet of water, of which (that is, one side of

it) I have every chance to become proprietor: this is a

poetical circumstance not to be lost sight of, and

accordingly I keep it full in my view. Amid these various

avocations, past, present, and to come, I have not thought

much about Waterloo, only that I am truly glad you like it.

I might, no doubt, have added many curious anecdotes, but I

think the pamphlet long enough as it stands, and never had

any design of writing copious notes.

I do most devoutly hope Lord Byron will succeed in his

proposal of bringing out one of your dramas; that he is your

sincere admirer is only synonymous with his being a man of

genius; and he has, I am convinced, both the power and

inclination to serve the public, by availing himself of the

treasures you have laid before them. Yet I long for "some

yet untasted spring," and heartily wish you would take Lord

B. into your counsels, and adjust, from your yet unpublished

materials, some drama for the public. In such a case, I

would, in your place, conceal my name till the issue of the

adventure. It is a sickening thing to think how many angry

and evil passions the mere name of admitted excellence

brings into full activity. I wish you would consider this

hint, and I am sure the result would be great gratification

to the public, and to yourself that sort of satisfaction

which arises from receiving proofs of having attained the

mark at which you aimed. Of this last, indeed, you cannot

doubt, if you consult only the voices of the intelligent and

the accomplished; but the object of the dramatist is

professedly to delight the public at large, and therefore I

think you should make the experiment fairly.

{p.080} Little Sophia is much obliged by your kind and

continued recollection: she is an excellent good child,

sufficiently sensible, very affectionate, not without

perception of character; but the gods have not made her

poetical, and I hope she will never attempt to act a part

which nature has not called her to. I am myself a poet,

writing to a poetess, and therefore cannot be suspected of a

wish to degrade a talent, to which, in whatever degree I may

have possessed it, I am indebted for much happiness: but

this depends only on the rare coincidence of some talent

falling in with a novelty in style and diction and conduct

of story, which suited the popular taste; and were my

children to be better poets than me, they would not be such

in general estimation, simply because the second cannot be

the first, and the first (I mean in point of date) is

everything, while others are nothing, even with more

intrinsic merit. I am therefore particularly anxious to

store the heads of my young damsels with something better

than the tags of rhymes; and I hope Sophia is old enough

(young though she be) to view her little incidents of

celebrity, such as they are, in the right point of view.

Mrs. Scott and she are at present in Edinburgh; the rest of

the children are with me in this place; my eldest boy is

already a bold horseman and a fine shot, though only about

fourteen years old. I assure you I was prouder of the first

blackcock he killed, than I have been of anything whatever

since I first killed one myself, and that is twenty years

ago. This is all stupid gossip; but, as Master Corporal Nym

says, "things must be as they may:" you cannot expect grapes

from thorns, or much amusement from a brain bewildered with

thorn hedges at Kaeside, for such is the sonorous title of

my new possession, in virtue of which I subscribe myself,

ABBOTSFORD & KAESIDE.

There is now to be mentioned a little pageant of {p.081} December,

1815, which perhaps interested _Abbotsford and Kaeside_ not very much

less than the "Field of the Cloth of Gold," as James Ballantyne calls

it, of the preceding autumn. This was no other than a football match,

got up under the auspices of the Duke of Buccleuch, between the men of

the Vale of Yarrow and the Burghers of Selkirk, the particulars of

which will be sufficiently explained by an extract from Ballantyne's

newspaper, written, I can have no doubt, by the Sheriff of the Forest.

But the part taken in this solemnity by the Ettrick Shepherd reminds

me of an extraordinary epistle which Scott had received from him some

months before this time, and of the account given by Hogg himself, in

one of his autobiographies, of the manner in which Scott's kindness

terminated the alienation it refers to.

The Shepherd, being as usual in pecuniary straits, had projected a

work, to be called The Poetic Mirror, in which should appear some

piece by each popular poet of the time, the whole to be edited by

himself, and published for his benefit; and he addressed, accordingly,

to his brother bards a circular petition for their best assistance.

Scott--like Byron and most of the other persons thus applied

to--declined the proposition. The letter in which he signified his

refusal has not been preserved;--indeed it is sufficiently remarkable,

that of all the many letters which Hogg must have received from his

distinguished contemporaries, he appears to have kept not one; but

Scott's decided aversion to joint-stock adventures in authorship must

have been well known ere now to Hogg--and, at all events, nobody can

suspect that his note of refusal was meant to be an unfriendly

communication. The Shepherd, however, took some phrase in high

dudgeon, and penned an answer virulently insolent in spirit and in

language, accusing him of base jealousy of his own superior natural

genius. I am not sure whether it was on this or another occasion of

the like sort, that James varied the usual formulas of {p.082}

epistolary composition, by beginning with "Damned Sir," and ending,

"Believe me, Sir, yours with disgust, etc.;" but certainly the

performance was such that no intercourse took place between the

parties for some weeks, or perhaps months, afterwards. The letter in

which Hogg at length solicits a renewal of kindliness says nothing, it

may be observed, of the circumstance which, according to his

autobiography, confirmed by the recollection of two friends, whom he

names in the letter itself (Mr. John Grieve and Mr. William Laidlaw),

had really caused him to repent of his suspicions, and their

outrageous expression. The fact was, that hearing, shortly after the

receipt of the offensive epistle, that Hogg was confined to his

lodgings, in an obscure alley of Edinburgh, called Gabriel's Road, by

a dangerous illness, Scott called on Mr. Grieve to make inquiries

about him, and to offer to take on himself the expenses of the best

medical attendance. He had, however, cautioned the worthy hatter that

no hint of this offer must reach Hogg; and, in consequence, it might

perhaps be the Shepherd's feeling at the time that he should not, in

addressing his lifelong benefactor, betray any acquaintance with this

recent interference on his behalf. There can be no doubt, however,

that he obeyed the genuine dictates of his better nature when he

penned this apologetic effusion:--

TO WALTER SCOTT, ESQ., CASTLE STREET.

GABRIEL'S ROAD, February 28, 1815.

Mr. SCOTT,--I think it is great nonsense for two men who are

friends at heart, and who ever must be so,--indeed it is not

in the nature of things that they can be otherwise,--should

be professed enemies.

Mr. Grieve and Mr. Laidlaw, who were very severe on me, and

to whom I was obliged to show your letter, have long ago

convinced me that I mistook part of it, and that it was not

me you held in such contempt, but the opinion of the public.

The {p.083} idea that you might mean that (though I still

think the reading will bear either construction) has given

me much pain; for I know I answered yours intemperately, and

in a mortal rage. I meant to have enclosed yours, and begged

of you to return mine, but I cannot find it, and am sure

that some one to whom I have been induced to show it, has

taken it away. However, as my troubles on that subject were

never like to wear to an end, I could no longer resist

telling you that I am extremely vexed about it. I desire not

a renewal of our former intimacy, for haply, after what I

have written, your family would not suffer it; but I wish it

to be understood that, when we meet _by chance_, we might

shake hands, and speak to one another as old acquaintances,

and likewise that we may exchange a letter occasionally, for

I find there are many things which I yearn to communicate to

you, and the tears rush to my eyes when I consider that I

may not.

If you allow of this, pray let me know, and if you do not,

let me know. Indeed, I am anxious to hear from you, for "as

the day of trouble is with me, so shall my strength be." To

be friends _from the teeth forwards_ is common enough; but

it strikes me that there is something still more ludicrous

in the reverse of the picture, and so to be enemies--and why

should I be, _from the teeth forwards_, yours sincerely,

James HOGG?

Scott's reply was, as Hogg says, "a brief note, telling him to think

no more of the business, and come to breakfast next morning." The

misunderstanding being thus closed, they appear to have counselled and

cooperated together in the most cordial fashion, in disciplining their

rural allies for the muster of Carterhaugh--the Duke of Buccleuch's

brother-in-law, the Earl of Home, having appointed the Shepherd his

Lieutenant over the Yarrow Band, while the Sheriff took under his

special cognizance the _Sutors_, i.e., _shoemakers_, of Selkirk--for

so the burgesses of that town have for ages styled themselves, and

under that denomination their warlike prowess in days of yore has been

celebrated in many an old ballad, besides the well-known one which

begins with

{p.084} "'Tis up wi' the Sutors o' Selkirk,

And 'tis down wi' the Earl of Home!"

In order to understand all the allusions in the newspaper record of

this important day, one must be familiar with the notes to the

Minstrelsy of the Scottish Border; but I shall not burden it with

further comment here.

FOOTBALL MATCH.

"On Monday, 4th December, there was played, upon the

extensive plain of Carterhaugh, near the junction of the

Ettrick and Yarrow, the greatest match at the ball which has

taken place for many years. It was held by the people of the

Dale of Yarrow, against those of the parish of Selkirk; the

former being brought to the field by the Right Hon. the Earl

of Home, and the Gallant Sutors by their Chief Magistrate,

Ebenezer Clarkson, Esq. Both sides were joined by many

volunteers from other parishes; and the appearance of the

various parties marching from their different glens to the

place of rendezvous, with pipes playing and loud

acclamations, carried back the coldest imagination to the

old times when the Foresters assembled with the less

peaceable purpose of invading the English territory, or

defending their own. The romantic character of the scenery

aided the illusion, as well as the performance of a feudal

ceremony previous to commencing the games.

"His Grace the Duke of Buccleuch and Queensberry came upon

the ground about eleven o'clock, attended by his sons, the

young Earl of Dalkeith and Lord John Scott; the Countess of

Home; the Ladies Anne, Charlotte, and Isabella Scott; Lord

and Lady Montagu and family; the Hon. General Sir Edward

Stopford, K. B.; Sir John Riddell of Riddell; Sir Alexander

Don of Newton; Mr. Elliot Lockhart, member for the county;

Mr. Pringle of Whytbank, younger; Mr. Pringle of Torwoodlee;

Captain Pringle, Royal Navy; Mr. Boyd of Broadmeadows and

family; Mr. Chisholm of Chisholm; Major Pott of Todrig; Mr.

Walter Scott, Sheriff of Selkirkshire, and family,--and many

other gentlemen and ladies.--The ancient banner of the

Buccleuch family, a curious and venerable relique,

emblazoned with armorial bearings, and with the word

'_Bellendaine_,' the ancient war-cry of the clan of Scott,

was then displayed, {p.085} as on former occasions when the

Chief took the field in person, whether for the purpose of

war or sport. The banner was delivered by Lady Anne Scott to

Master Walter Scott, younger of Abbotsford, who attended

suitably mounted and armed, and riding over the field

displayed it to the sound of the war-pipes, and amid the

acclamations of the assembled spectators, who could not be

fewer than 2000 in number. That this singular renewal of an

ancient military custom might not want poetical celebrity,

verses were distributed among the spectators, composed for

the occasion by Mr. Walter Scott and the Ettrick

Shepherd.--Mr. James Hogg acted as aide-de-camp to the Earl

of Home in the command of the Yarrow men, and Mr. Robert

Henderson of Selkirk to Mr. Clarkson, both of whom

contributed not a little to the good order of the day.

"The ball was thrown up between the parties by the Duke of

Buccleuch, and the first game was gained, after a severe

conflict of an hour and a half duration, by the Selkirk men.

The second game was still more severely contested, and after

a close and stubborn struggle of more than three hours, with

various fortune, and much display of strength and agility on

both sides, was at length carried by the Yarrow men. The

ball should then have been thrown up a third time, but

considerable difficulty occurred in arranging the voluntary

auxiliaries from other parishes, so as to make the match

equal; and, as the day began to close, it was found

impossible to bring the strife to an issue, by playing a

decisive game.

"Both parties, therefore, parted with equal honors, but,

before they left the ground, the Sheriff threw up his hat,

and in Lord Dalkeith's name and his own, challenged the

Yarrow men, on the part of the Sutors, to a match to be

played upon the first convenient opportunity, with 100

picked men only on each side. The challenge was mutually

accepted by Lord Home, on his own part, and for Lord John

Scott, and was received with acclamation by the players on

both sides. The principal gentlemen present took part with

one side or other, except the Duke of Buccleuch, who remains

neutral. Great play is expected, and all bets are to be paid

by the losers to the poor of the winning parish. We cannot

dismiss the subject without giving our highest commendation

to the Earl of Home, {p.086} and to Mr. Clarkson, for the

attention which they showed in promoting the spirit and good

order of the day. For the players themselves, it was

impossible to see a finer set of active and athletic young

fellows than appeared on the field. But what we chiefly

admired in their conduct was, that though several hundreds

in number, exceedingly keen for their respective parties,

and engaged in so rough and animated a contest, they

maintained the most perfect good-humor, and showed how

unnecessary it is to discourage manly and athletic exercises

among the common people, under pretext of maintaining

subordination and good order. We have only to regret that

the great concourse of spectators rendered it difficult to

mention the names of the several players who distinguished

themselves by feats of strength or agility; but we must not

omit to record that the first ball was _hailed_ by Robert

Hall, mason in _Selkirk_, and the second by George Brodie,

from _Greatlaws_, upon _Aillwater_.

"The Selkirk party wore slips of fir as their mark of

distinction--the Yarrow men, sprigs of heath.

"Refreshments were distributed to the players by the Duke of

Buccleuch's domestics, in a booth erected for the purpose;

and no persons were allowed to sell ale or spirits on the

field.

"In the evening there was a dance at the Duke's hunting-seat

at Bowhill, attended by the nobility and gentry who had

witnessed the sport of the day; and the fascination of Gow's

violin and band detained them in the dancing-room till the

dawn of the winter morning."

The newspaper then gives the songs above alluded to--namely, Scott's

Lifting of the Banner:--

"From the brown crest of Newark its summons extending,

Our signal is waving in smoke and in flame,

And each Forester blithe, from his mountain descending,

Bounds light o'er the heather to join in the game;

Then up with the Banner! let forest winds fan her!

She has blazed over Ettrick eight ages and more;

In sport we'll attend her, in battle defend her,

With heart and with hand, like our Fathers before," etc.[26]

[Footnote 26: See _Poetical Works_ (Ed. 1834), vol. xi.

p. 312 [Cambridge Ed. p. 424].]

--and that excellent ditty by Hogg, entitled The Ettrick {p.087}

Garland, to the Ancient Banner of the House of Buccleuch:--

"And hast thou here, like hermit gray,

Thy mystic characters unroll'd,

O'er peaceful revellers to play,

Thou emblem of the days of old?

All hail! memorial of the brave,

The liegeman's pride, the Border's awe!

May thy gray pennon never wave

On sterner field than Carterhaugh!" etc.

I have no doubt the Sheriff of the Forest was a prouder man, when he

saw his boy ride about Carterhaugh with the pennon of Bellenden, than

when Platoff mounted himself for the imperial review of the _Champ de

Mars_. It is a pity that I should have occasion to allude, before I

quit a scene so characteristic of Scott, to another outbreak of Hogg's

jealous humor. His Autobiography informs us, that when the more

distinguished part of the company assembled on the conclusion of the

sport to dine at Bowhill, he was proceeding to place himself at a

particular table--but the Sheriff seized his arm, told him _that_ was

reserved for the nobility, and seated him at an inferior

board--"between himself and the Laird of Harden"--the first gentleman

of the clan Scott. "The fact is," says Hogg, "I am convinced he was

sore afraid of my getting to be too great a favorite among the young

ladies of Buccleuch!" Who can read this, and not be reminded of Sancho

Panza and the Duchess? And, after all, he quite mistook what Scott had

said to him; for certainly there was, neither on this, nor on any

similar occasion at Bowhill, any _high table for the nobility_, though

there was a _side-table for the children_, at which, when the Shepherd

of Ettrick was about to seat himself, his friend probably whispered

that it was reserved for the "_little_ lords and ladies, and their

playmates." This blunder may seem undeserving of any explanation; but

it is often in small matters that the strongest feelings are most

strikingly betrayed--and this story is, in exact {p.088} proportion

to its silliness, indicative of the jealous feeling which mars and

distorts so many of Hogg's representations of Scott's conduct and

demeanor.

It appears from the account of this football match in the Edinburgh

Journal, that Scott took a lead in proposing a renewal of the contest.

This, however, never occurred; and that it ought not to do so had

probably occurred from the first to the Duke of Buccleuch, who is

mentioned as having alone abstained from laying any bets on the final

issue.

When Mr. Washington Irving visited Scott two years afterwards at

Abbotsford, he told his American friend that "the old feuds and local

interests, and rivalries and animosities of the Scotch, still slept in

their ashes, and might easily be roused; their hereditary feeling for

names was still great; it was not always safe to have even the game of

football between villages;--the old clannish spirit was too apt to

break out."[27]

[Footnote 27: Irving's _Abbotsford and Newstead_, 1835,

p. 40.]

The good Duke of Buccleuch's solitary exemption from these heats of

Carterhaugh might read a significant lesson to minor politicians of

all parties on more important scenes. In pursuance of the same

peace-making spirit, he appears to have been desirous of doing

something gratifying to the men of the town of Selkirk, who had on

this occasion taken the field against his Yarrow tenantry. His Grace

consulted Scott about the design of a piece of plate to be presented

to their community; and his letter on this weighty subject must not be

omitted in the memoirs of a Sheriff of Selkirk:--

TO HIS GRACE THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH, ETC., BOWHILL.

EDINBURGH, Thursday.

MY DEAR LORD,--I have proceeded in my commission about the

cup. It will be a very handsome one. But I am still puzzled

to dispose of the birse[28] in a {p.089} becoming manner.

It is a most unmanageable decoration. I tried it upright on

the top of the cup; it looked like a shaving-brush, and the

goblet might be intended to make the lather. Then I thought

I had a brilliant idea. The arms of Selkirk are a female

seated on a sarcophagus, decorated with the arms of

Scotland, which will make a beautiful top to the cup. So I

thought of putting the birse into the lady's other hand;

but, alas, it looked so precisely like the rod of

chastisement uplifted over the poor child, that I laughed at

the drawing for half an hour. Next I tried to take off the

castigatory appearance, by inserting the bristles in a kind

of handle; but then it looked as if the poor woman had been

engaged in the capacities of housemaid and child-keeper at

once, and, fatigued with her double duty, had sat down on

the wine-cooler, with the broom in one hand, and the bairn

in the other. At length, after some conference with Charles

Sharpe, I have hit on a plan, which, I think, will look very

well, if tolerably executed,--namely, to have the lady

seated in due form on the top of the lid (which will look

handsome, and will be well taken), and to have a thistle

wreathed around the sarcophagus and rising above her head,

and from the top of the thistle shall proceed the birse. I

will bring a drawing with me, and they shall get the cup

ready in the mean time. I hope to be at Abbotsford on Monday

night, to stay for a week. My cat has eat two or three

birds, while regaling on the crumbs that were thrown for

them. This was a breach of hospitality; but _oportet

vivere_--and _micat inter omnes_--with which stolen pun, and

my respectful compliments to Lord Montagu and the ladies, I

am, very truly, your Grace's most faithful and obliged

servant,

Walter SCOTT.

[Footnote 28: A _birse_, or bunch of hog's _bristles_,

forms the cognizance of the Sutors. When a new burgess

is admitted into their community, _the birse_ passes

round with the cup of welcome, and every elder brother

dips it into the wine, and draws it through his mouth,

before it reaches the happy neophyte, who of course pays

it similar respect.]

{p.090} P. S.--Under another cover, which I have just

received, I send the two drawings of the front and reverse

of the lid of the proposed cup. Your Grace will be so good

as understand that the thistle--the top of which is

garnished with the bristle--is entirely detached, in

working, from the figure, and slips into a socket. The

following lines are humbly suggested for a motto, being

taken from an ancient Scottish canzonetta,--unless the

Yarrow committee can find any better:--

"The sutor ga'e the sow a kiss:

Grumph! quo' the sow, it's a' for my birss."

Some weeks before the year 1815 closed, Mr. Morritt sustained the

heaviest of domestic afflictions; and several letters on that sad

subject had passed between Rokeby and Abbotsford,[29] before the date

of the following:--

[Footnote 29: [A touching letter from Morritt, written

shortly before his wife's death, and one of Scott's,

written after that event, will be found in _Familiar

Letters_, vol. i. pp. 352-354.]]

TO J. B. S. MORRITT, ESQ., M. P., ROKEBY PARK.

EDINBURGH, 22d December, 1815.

MY DEAR MORRITT,--While you know what satisfaction it would

have given me to have seen you here, I am very sensible of

the more weighty reasons which you urge for preferring to

stay at Rokeby for some time. I only hope you will remember

that Scotland has claims on you, whenever you shall find

your own mind so far at ease as to permit you to look abroad

for consolation; and if it should happen that you thought of

being here about our time of vacation, I have my time then

entirely at my own command, and I need not say, that as much

of it as could in any manner of way contribute to your

amusement, is most heartily at yours. I have myself at

present the melancholy task of watching the declining health

of my elder brother, Major Scott, whom, I think, you have

seen.

{p.091} My literary occupation is getting through the press

the Letters of Paul, of whose lucubrations I trust soon to

send you a copy. As the observations of a bystander, perhaps

you will find some amusement in them, especially as I had

some channels of information not accessible to every one.

The recess of our courts, which takes place to-morrow, for

three weeks, will give me ample time to complete this job,

and also the second volume of Triermain, which is nearly

finished,--a strange rude story, founded partly on the

ancient northern traditions respecting the Berserkers, whose

peculiar habits and fits of martial frenzy make such a

figure in the Sagas. I shall then set myself seriously to

The Antiquary, of which I have only a very general sketch at

present; but when once I get my pen to the paper it will

walk fast enough. I am sometimes tempted to leave it alone,

and try whether it will not write as well without the

assistance of my head as with it. A hopeful prospect for the

reader. In the mean while, the snow, which is now falling so

fast as to make it dubious when this letter may reach

Rokeby, is likely to forward these important avocations, by

keeping me a constant resident in Edinburgh, in lieu of my

plan of going to Abbotsford, where I had a number of schemes

in hand, in the way of planting and improving. I believe I

told you I have made a considerable addition to my little

farm, and extended my domains towards a wild lake, which I

have a good prospect of acquiring also. It has a sort of

legendary fame; for the persuasion of the solitary shepherds

who approach its banks is, that it is tenanted by a very

large amphibious animal called by them a water-bull, and

which several of them pretend to have seen. As his

dimensions greatly exceed those of an otter, I am tempted to

think with Trinculo, "This is the devil, and no monster."

But, after all, is it not strange, that as to almost all the

lakes in Scotland, both Lowland and Highland, such a belief

should prevail? and that the description popularly given

{p.092} uniformly corresponds with that of the

hippopotamus? Is it possible, that at some remote period,

that remarkable animal, like some others which have now

disappeared, may have been an inhabitant of our large lakes?

Certainly the vanishing of the mammoth and other animals

from the face of the creation renders such a conjecture less

wild than I would otherwise esteem it. It is certain we have

lost the beaver, whose bones have been more than once found

in our Selkirkshire bogs and marlmosses. The remains of the

wild bull are very frequently found; and I have more than

one skull with horns of most formidable dimensions.

About a fortnight ago we had a great football match in

Selkirkshire, when the Duke of Buccleuch raised his banner

(a very curious and ancient pennon) in great form. Your

friend Walter was banner-bearer, dressed, like a forester of

old, in green, with a green bonnet, and an eagle feather in

it; and, as he was well mounted, and rode handsomely over

the field, he was much admired by all his clansmen.

I have thrown these trifles together, without much hope that

they will afford you amusement; but I know you will wish to

know what I am about, and I have but trifles to send to

those friends who interest themselves about a trifler. My

present employment is watching, from time to time, the

progress of a stupid cause, in order to be ready to reduce

the sentence into writing, when the Court shall have decided

whether Gordon of Kenmore or MacMichan of Meikleforthhead be

the superior of the lands of Tarschrechan and Dalbrattie,

and entitled to the feudal casualties payable forth thereof,

which may amount to twopence sterling, once in half a dozen

of years. Marry, sir, they make part of a freehold

qualification, and the decision may wing a voter. I did not

send the book you received by the Selkirk coach. I wish I

could have had sense enough to send anything which could

afford you consolation. I think our friend {p.093} Lady

Louisa was likely to have had this attention; she has, God

knows, been herself tried with affliction, and is well

acquainted with the sources from which comfort can be drawn.

My wife joins in kindest remembrances, as do Sophia and

Walter. Ever yours affectionately,

Walter SCOTT.

This letter is dated the 22d of December. On the 26th, John

Ballantyne, being then at Abbotsford, writes to Messrs. Constable:

"Paul is _all_ in hand;" and an envelope, addressed to James

Ballantyne on the 29th, has preserved another little fragment of

Scott's playful doggerel:--

"Dear James--I'm done, thank God, with the long yarns

Of the most prosy of Apostles--Paul;

And now advance, sweet Heathen of Monkbarns,

Step out, old quizz, as fast as I can scrawl."

{p.094} CHAPTER XXXVII.

Publication of Paul's Letters to his Kinsfolk. -- Guy

Mannering "Terry-fied." -- Death of Major John Scott. --

Letters to Thomas Scott. -- Publication of the Antiquary. --

History of 1814 for the Edinburgh Annual Register. --

Letters on the History of Scotland Projected. -- Publication

of the First Tales of My Landlord by Murray and Blackwood.

-- Anecdotes by Mr. Train. -- Quarterly Review on the Tales.

-- Building at Abbotsford Begun. -- Letters to Morritt,

Terry, Murray, and the Ballantynes.

1816.

The year 1815 may be considered as, for Scott's peaceful tenor of

life, an eventful one. That which followed has left almost its only

traces in the successive appearance of nine volumes, which attest the

prodigal genius, and hardly less astonishing industry of the man.

Early in January were published Paul's Letters to his Kinsfolk, of

which I need not now say more than that they were received with lively

curiosity, and general, though not vociferous applause. The first

edition was an octavo, of 6000 copies; and it was followed, in the

course of the next two or three years, by a second and a third,

amounting together to 3000 more. The popularity of the novelist was at

its height; and this admitted, if not avowed, specimen of Scott's

prose must have been perceived, by all who had any share of

discrimination, to flow from the same pen.

Mr. Terry produced, in the spring of 1816, a dramatic {p.095} piece,

entitled Guy Mannering, which met with great success on the London

boards, and still continues to be a favorite with the theatrical

public. What share the novelist himself had in this first specimen of

what he used to call "the art of _Terryfying_," I cannot exactly say;

but his correspondence shows that the pretty song of the Lullaby[30]

was not his only contribution to it; and I infer that he had taken the

trouble to modify the plot, and rearrange, for stage purposes, a

considerable part of the original dialogue. The casual risk of

discovery, through the introduction of the song which had, in the mean

time, been communicated to one of his humble friends, the late Mr.

Alexander Campbell,[31] editor of Albyn's Anthology--(commonly known

at Abbotsford as, by way of excellence, _The Dunniewassal_,)--and

Scott's suggestions on that difficulty will amuse the reader of the

following letter:--

[Footnote 30: See Scott's _Poetical Works_ (Ed. 1834),

vol. xi. p. 317 (Cambridge Ed. p. 425).]

[Footnote 31: This Mr. Campbell was the same whom the

poet's mother employed to teach her boys to sing, as

recorded in the Autobiographical Fragment--_ante_, vol.

i. p. 44. I believe he was also the "litigious

Highlander" of a story told in Irving's _Abbotsford and

Newstead_, p. 57.

(In the November of this year, Scott writes to Lady

Abercorn: "The only thing I have been doing of late is

to write two or three songs for a poor man called

Campbell.... He has made an immense collection of

Highland airs, and I have given him words for some of

them. One of them is the only good song I ever wrote--it

is a fine Highland Gathering tune called _Pibroch an

Donuil Dhu_, that is, the Pibroch of Donald the

Black."--_Familiar Letters_, vol. i. p. 374.)]

TO D. TERRY, ESQ., ALFRED PLACE, BLOOMSBURY, LONDON.

ABBOTSFORD, 18th April, 1816.

MY DEAR TERRY,--I give you joy of your promotion to the

dignity of an householder, and heartily wish you all the

success you so well deserve, to answer the approaching

enlargement of your domestic establishment. You will find a

house a very devouring monster, and that the purveying for

it requires a little exertion, and a great {p.096} deal of

self-denial and arrangement. But when there is domestic

peace and contentment, all that would otherwise be

disagreeable, as restraining our taste and occupying our

time, becomes easy. I trust Mrs. Terry will get her business

easily over, and that you will soon "dandle Dickie on your

knee."--I have been at the spring circuit, which made me

late in receiving your letter, and there I was introduced to

a man whom I never saw in my life before, namely, the

proprietor of all the Pepper and Mustard family,--in other

words, the genuine Dandie Dinmont. Dandie is himself modest,

and says, "he b'lives it's only the dougs that is in the

buik, and no himsel'." As the surveyor of taxes was going

his ominous rounds past Hyndlea, which is the abode of

Dandie, his whole pack rushed out upon the man of execution,

and Dandie followed them (conscious that their number

greatly exceeded his return), exclaiming, "The tae hauf o'

them is but whalps, man." In truth, I knew nothing of the

man, except his odd humor of having only two names for

twenty dogs. But there are lines of general resemblance

among all these hill-men, which there is no missing; and

Jamie Davidson of Hyndlea certainly looks Dandie Dinmont

remarkably well. He is much flattered with the compliment,

and goes uniformly by the name among his comrades, but has

never read the book. Ailie used to read it to him, but it

set him to sleep. All this you will think funny enough. I am

afraid I am in a scrape about the song, and that of my own

making; for as it never occurred to me that there was

anything odd in my writing two or three verses for you,

which have no connection with the novel, I was at no pains

to disown them; and Campbell is just that sort of crazy

creature, with whom there is no confidence, not from want of

honor and disposition to oblige, but from his flighty

temper. The music of _Cadil gu lo_ is already printed in his

publication, and nothing can be done with him, for fear of

setting his tongue a-going. Erskine and {p.097} you may

consider whether you should barely acknowledge an obligation

to an unknown friend, or pass the matter altogether in

silence. In my opinion, my _first_ idea was preferable to

both, because I cannot see what earthly connection there is

between the song and the novel, or how acknowledging the one

is fathering the other. On the contrary, it seems to me that

acknowledgment tends to exclude the idea of farther

obligation than to the extent specified. I forgot also that

I had given a copy of the lines to Mrs. Macleod of Macleod,

from whom I had the air. But I remit the matter entirely to

you and Erskine, for there must be many points in it which I

cannot be supposed a good judge of. At any rate, don't let

it delay your publication, and believe I shall be quite

satisfied with what you think proper.

I have got from my friend Glengarry the noblest dog ever

seen on the Border since Johnnie Armstrong's time. He is

between the wolf and deer greyhound, about six feet long

from the tip of the nose to the tail, and high and strong in

proportion: he is quite gentle, and a great favorite: tell

Will Erskine he will eat off his plate without being at the

trouble to put a paw on the table or chair.[32] I showed him

to Mathews, who dined one day in Castle Street before I came

here, where, except for Mrs. S., I am like unto

{p.098} "The spirit who bideth by himself,

In the land of mist and snow"--[33]

for it is snowing and hailing eternally, and will kill all

the lambs to a certainty, unless it changes in a few hours.

At any rate, it will cure us of the embarrassments arising

from plenty and low markets. Much good luck to your dramatic

exertions: when I can be of use, command me. Mrs. Scott

joins me in regards to Mrs. Terry, and considers the house

as the greatest possible bargain: the situation is all you

can wish. Adieu! yours truly,

Walter SCOTT.

[Footnote 32: [In the letter accompanying his gift,

Glengarry says: "His name is Maida, out of respect for

that action in which my brother had the honor to lead

the 78th Highlanders to victory." Writing to Joanna

Baillie, April 12, Scott describes his new friend as

"the finest dog of the kind in Scotland.... He is

between the deer greyhound and mastiff, with a shaggy

mane like a lion; he always sits beside me at dinner,

his head as high as the back of my chair; yet it will

gratify you to know that a favorite cat keeps him in the

greatest possible order, and insists upon all rights of

precedence, and scratches with impunity the nose of an

animal who would make no bones of a wolf, and pulls down

a red deer without fear or difficulty. I heard my friend

set up some most piteous howls, and I assure you the

noise was no joke, all occasioned by his fear of passing

puss, who had stationed himself on the

stairs."--_Familiar Letters_, vol. i. p. 358.]]

[Footnote 33: Coleridge--_Ancient Mariner_.]

P. S.--On consideration, and comparing difficulties, I think

I will settle with Campbell to take my name from the verses,

as they stand in his collection. The verses themselves I

cannot take away without imprudent explanations; and as they

go to other music, and stand without any name, they will

probably not be noticed, so you need give yourself no

farther trouble on the score. I should like to see my copy:

pray send it to the post-office, under cover to Mr.

Freeling, whose unlimited privilege is at my service on all

occasions.

Early in May appeared the novel of The Antiquary, which seems to have

been begun a little before the close of 1815. It came out at a moment

of domestic distress.

Throughout the year 1815, Major John Scott had been drooping. He died

on the 8th of May, 1816; and I extract the letter in which this event

was announced to Mr. Thomas Scott by his only surviving brother.

TO THOMAS SCOTT, ESQ., PAYMASTER OF THE 70TH REGIMENT, CANADA.

EDINBURGH, 15th May, 1816.

MY DEAR TOM,--This brings you the melancholy news of our

brother John's concluding his long and lingering illness by

death, upon Thursday last. We had {p.099} thought it

impossible he should survive the winter, but, as the weather

became milder, he gathered strength, and went out several

times. In the beginning of the week he became worse, and on

Wednesday kept his bed. On Thursday, about two o'clock, they

sent me an express to Abbotsford--the man reached me at

nine. I immediately set out, and travelled all night--but

had not the satisfaction to see my brother alive. He had

died about four o'clock, without much pain, being completely

exhausted. You will naturally feel most anxious about my

mother's state of health and spirits. I am happy to say she

has borne this severe shock with great firmness and

resignation, is perfectly well in her health, and as strong

in her mind as ever you knew her. She feels her loss, but is

also sensible that protracted existence, with a constitution

so irretrievably broken up, could have been no blessing.

Indeed I must say, that, in many respects, her situation

will be more comfortable on account of this removal, when

the first shock is over; for to watch an invalid, and to

undergo all the changes of a temper fretted by suffering,

suited ill with her age and habits. The funeral, which took

place yesterday, was decent and private, becoming our

father's eldest son, and the head of a quiet family. After

it, I asked Hay Donaldson and Mr. Macculloch[34] to look

over his papers, in case there should be any testamentary

provision, but none such was found; nor do I think he had

any intention of altering the destination which divides his

effects between his surviving brothers.--Your affectionate

W. S.

[Footnote 34: The late Mr. Hay Donaldson, W. S.,--an

intimate friend of both Thomas and Walter Scott,--and

Mr. Macculloch of Ardwell, the brother of Mrs. Thomas

Scott.]

A few days afterwards, he hands to Mr. Thomas Scott a formal statement

of pecuniary affairs; the result of which was, that the Major had left

something not much under £6000. Major Scott, from all I have heard,

was {p.100} a sober, sedate bachelor, of dull mind and frugal tastes,

who, after his retirement from the army, divided his time between his

mother's primitive fireside, and the society of a few whist-playing

brother officers, that met for an evening rubber at Fortune's tavern.

But, making every allowance for his retired and thrifty habits, I

infer that the payments made to each of the three brothers out of

their father's estate must have, prior to 1816, amounted to £5000.

From the letter conveying this statement (29th May), I extract a few

sentences:--

DEAR TOM,--... Should the possession of this sum, and the

certainty that you must, according to the course of nature,

in a short space of years succeed to a similar sum of £3000

belonging to our mother, induce you to turn your thoughts to

Scotland, I shall be most happy to forward your views with

any influence I may possess; and I have little doubt that,

sooner or later, something may be done. But, unfortunately,

every avenue is now choked with applicants, whose claims are

very strong; for the number of disbanded officers, and

public servants dismissed in consequence of Parliament

turning restive and refusing the income-tax, is great and

increasing. Economy is the order of the day, and I assure

you they are shaving properly close. It would, no doubt, be

comparatively easy to get you a better situation where you

are, but then it is bidding farewell to your country, at

least for a long time, and separating your children from all

knowledge of those with whom they are naturally connected. I

shall anxiously expect to hear from you on your views and

wishes. I think, at all events, you ought to get rid of the

drudgery of the paymastership--but not without trying to

exchange it for something else. I do not know how it is with

you--but I do not feel myself quite so _young_ as I was when

we met last, and I should like well to see my only brother

return to his own country and settle, without thoughts

{p.101} of leaving it, till it is exchanged for one that is

dark and distant.... I left all Jack's personal trifles at

my mother's disposal. There was nothing of the slightest

value, excepting his gold watch, which was my sister's, and

a good one. My mother says he had wished my son Walter

should have it, as his male representative--which I can only

accept on condition _your_ little Walter will accept a

similar token of regard from his remaining uncle.--Yours

affectionately,

W. S.

The letter in which Scott communicated his brother's death to Mr.

Morritt gives us his own original opinion of The Antiquary. It has

also some remarks on the separation of Lord and Lady Byron--and the

"domestic verses" of the noble poet.

TO J. B. S. MORRITT, ESQ., M. P., LONDON.

EDINBURGH, May 16, 1816.

MY DEAR MORRITT,--I have been occupied of late with scenes

of domestic distress, my poor brother, Major John Scott,

having last week closed a life which wasting disease had

long rendered burthensome. His death, under all the

circumstances, cannot be termed a subject of deep

affliction; and though we were always on fraternal terms of

mutual kindness and good-will, yet our habits of life, our

taste for society and circles of friends, were so totally

different, that there was less frequent intercourse between

us than our connection and real liking to each other might

have occasioned. Yet it is a heavy consideration to have

lost the last but one who was interested in our early

domestic life, our habits of boyhood, and our first friends

and connections. It makes one look about and see how the

scene has changed around him, and how he himself has been

changed with it. My only remaining brother is in Canada, and

seems to have an intention of remaining there; so that my

mother, now upwards of eighty, has now only one child left

to her {p.102} out of thirteen whom she has borne. She is a

most excellent woman, possessed, even at her advanced age,

of all the force of mind and sense of duty which have

carried her through so many domestic griefs, as the

successive deaths of eleven children, some of them come to

men and women's estate, naturally infers. She is the

principal subject of my attention at present, and is, I am

glad to say, perfectly well in body and composed in mind.

Nothing can give me more pleasure than the prospect of

seeing you in September, which will suit our motions

perfectly well. I trust I shall have an opportunity to

introduce you to some of our glens which you have not yet

seen. But I hope we shall have some mild weather before that

time, for we are now in the seventh month of winter, which

almost leads me to suppose that we shall see no summer this

season. As for spring, that is past praying for. In the

month of November last, people were skating in the

neighborhood of Edinburgh; and now, in the middle of May,

the snow is lying white on Arthur's Seat, and on the range

of the Pentlands. It is really fearful, and the sheep are

perishing by scores. _Jam satis terræ nivis_, etc., may well

be taken up as the song of eighteen hundred and sixteen.

So Lord Byron's romance seems to be concluded for one

while--and it is surely time, after he has announced, or

rather they themselves have announced, half-a-dozen

blackguard newspaper editors, to have been his confidants on

the occasion. Surely it is a strange thirst of public fame

that seeks such a road to it. But Lord Byron, with high

genius and many points of a noble and generous feeling, has

Childe Harolded himself, and outlawed himself, into too

great a resemblance with the pictures of his imagination. He

has one excuse, however, and it is a sad one. I have been

reckoned to make a good hit enough at a pirate, or an

outlaw, or a smuggling bandit; but I cannot say I was ever

so much enchanted with my {p.103} work as to think of

carrying off a _drift_ of my neighbor's sheep, or half a

dozen of his milk cows. Only I remember, in the rough times,

having a scheme with the Duke of Buccleuch, that when the

worst came to the worst, we should repair Hermitage Castle,

and live, like Robin Hood and his merry men, at the expense

of all round us. But this presupposed a grand

_bouleversement_ of society. In the mean while, I think my

noble friend is something like my old peacock, who chooses

to bivouac apart from his lady, and sit below my bedroom

window, to keep me awake with his screeching lamentation.

Only I own he is not equal in melody to Lord Byron, for

_Fare-thee-well--and if for ever_, etc., is a very sweet

dirge indeed. After all, _C'est génie mal logé_, and that's

all that can be said about it.

I am quite reconciled to your opinions on the income-tax,

and am not at all in despair at the prospect of keeping £200

a year in my pocket, since the ministers can fadge without

it. But their throwing the helve after the hatchet, and

giving up the malt-duty because they had lost the other, was

droll enough. After all, our fat friend[35] must learn to

live within compass, and fire off no more crackers in the

Park, for John Bull is getting dreadfully sore on all sides

when money is concerned.

[Footnote 35: Shortly after Beau Brummell (immortalized

in _Don Juan_) fell into disgrace with the Prince

Regent, and was dismissed from the society of Carlton

House, he was riding with another gentleman in the Park,

when the Prince met them. His Royal Highness stopt to

speak to Brummell's companion--the Beau continued to jog

on--and when the other dandy rejoined him, asked with an

air of sovereign indifference, "Who is your fat friend?"

Such, at least, was the story that went the round of the

newspapers at the time, and highly tickled Scott's

fancy. I have heard that nobody enjoyed so much as the

Prince of Wales himself an earlier specimen of the

Beau's assurance. Taking offence at some part of His

Royal Highness's conduct or demeanor, "Upon my word,"

observed Mr. Brummell, "if this kind of thing goes on, I

shall be obliged to cut Wales, and bring the old King

into fashion."]

I sent you, some time since, The Antiquary. It is not so

interesting as its predecessors--the period did not {p.104}

admit of so much romantic situation. But it has been more

fortunate than any of them in the sale, for 6000 went off in

the first six days, and it is now at press again; which is

very flattering to the unknown author. Another incognito

proposes immediately to resume the second volume of

Triermain, which is at present in the state of the Bear and

Fiddle.[36] Adieu, dear Morritt.

Ever yours,

Walter SCOTT.

[Footnote 36: See _Hudibras_.]

Speaking of his third novel in a letter of the same date to Terry,

Scott says: "It wants the romance of Waverley and the adventure of Guy

Mannering; and yet there is some salvation about it, for if a man will

paint from nature, he will be likely to amuse those who are daily

looking at it."

After a little pause of hesitation, The Antiquary attained popularity

not inferior to Guy Mannering; and though the author appears for a

moment to have shared the doubts which he read in the countenance of

James Ballantyne, it certainly was, in the sequel, his chief favorite

among all his novels. Nor is it difficult to account for this

preference, without laying any stress on the fact, that, during a few

short weeks, it was pretty commonly talked of as a falling off from

its immediate predecessors--and that some minor critics reëchoed this

stupid whisper in print. In that view, there were many of its

successors that had much stronger claims on the parental instinct of

protection. But the truth is, that although Scott's Introduction of

1830 represents him as pleased with fancying that, in the principal

personage, he had embalmed a worthy friend of his boyish days, his own

antiquarian propensities, originating perhaps in the kind attentions

of George Constable of Wallace-Craigie, and fostered not a little, at

about as ductile a period, by those of old Clerk of Eldin, and John

Ramsay of Ochtertyre, had by degrees so developed themselves, that he

{p.105} could hardly, even when The Antiquary was published, have

scrupled about recognizing a quaint caricature of the founder of

Abbotsford Museum, in the inimitable portraiture of the Laird of

Monkbarns. The Descriptive Catalogue of that collection, which he

began towards the close of his life, but, alas, never finished, is

entitled "Reliquiæ Trottcosianæ--or the Gabions of the late Jonathan

Oldbuck, Esq."

But laying this, which might have been little more than a good-humored

pleasantry, out of the question, there is assuredly no one of all his

works on which more of his own early associations have left their

image. Of those early associations, as his full-grown tastes were all

the progeny, so his genius, in all its happiest efforts, was the

"Recording Angel;" and when George Constable first expounded his

"Gabions" to the child that was to immortalize his name, they were

either wandering hand in hand over the field where the grass still

grew rank upon the grave of _Balmawhapple_, or sauntering on the beach

where the _Mucklebackets_ of Prestonpans dried their nets, singing,--

"Weel may the boatie row, and better may she speed,

O weel may the boatie row that wins the bairns' bread"--

or telling wild stories about cliff-escapes and the funerals of

shipwrecked fishermen.

Considered by itself, without reference to these sources of personal

interest, this novel seems to me to possess, almost throughout, in

common with its two predecessors, a kind of simple unsought charm,

which the subsequent works of the series hardly reached, save in

occasional snatches: like them it is, in all its humbler and softer

scenes, the transcript of actual Scottish life, as observed by the man

himself. And I think it must also be allowed that he has nowhere

displayed his highest art, that of skilful contrast, in greater

perfection. Even the tragic romance of Waverley does not set off its

Macwheebles and Callum Begs better than the oddities of {p.106}

Jonathan Oldbuck and his circle are relieved, on the one hand, by the

stately gloom of the Glenallans, on the other, by the stern affliction

of the poor fisherman, who, when discovered repairing the "auld black

bitch o' a boat" in which his boy had been lost, and congratulated by

his visitor on being capable of the exertion, makes answer,--"And what

would you have me to do, unless I wanted to see four children starve,

because one is drowned? _It's weel wi' you gentles, that can sit in

the house wi' handkerchers at your een, when ye lose a friend; but the

like o' us maun to our wark again, if our hearts were beating as hard

as my hammer._"

It may be worth noting, that it was in correcting the proof sheets of

this novel that Scott first took to equipping his chapters with

mottoes of his own fabrication. On one occasion he happened to ask

John Ballantyne, who was sitting by him, to hunt for a particular

passage in Beaumont and Fletcher. John did as he was bid, but did not

succeed in discovering the lines. "Hang it, Johnnie," cried Scott, "I

believe I can make a motto sooner than you will find one." He did so

accordingly; and from that hour, whenever memory failed to suggest an

appropriate epigraph, he had recourse to the inexhaustible mines of

"_old play_" or "_old ballad_," to which we owe some of the most

exquisite verses that ever flowed from his pen.

Unlike, I believe, most men, whenever Scott neared the end of one

composition, his spirits seem to have caught a new spring of buoyancy,

and before the last sheet was sent from his desk, he had crowded his

brain with the imagination of another fiction. The Antiquary was

published, as we have seen, in May, but by the beginning of April he

had already opened to the Ballantynes the plan of the first Tales of

my Landlord; and--to say nothing of Harold the Dauntless, which he

began shortly after The Bridal of Triermain was finished, and which he

seems to have kept before him for two years {p.107} as a congenial

plaything, to be taken up whenever the coach brought no proof sheets

to jog him as to serious matters--he had also, before this time,

undertaken to write the historical department of the Register for

1814. Mr. Southey had, for reasons upon which I do not enter,

discontinued his services to that work: and it was now doubly

necessary, after trying for one year a less eminent hand, that if the

work were not to be dropped altogether, some strenuous exertion should

be made to sustain its character. Scott had not yet collected the

materials requisite for his historical sketch of a year distinguished

for the importance and complexity of its events; but these, he doubted

not, would soon reach him, and he felt no hesitation about pledging

himself to complete, not only that sketch, but four new volumes of

prose romances--and his Harold the Dauntless also, if Ballantyne could

make any suitable arrangement on that score--between the April and the

Christmas of 1816.

The Antiquary had been published by Constable, but I presume that, in

addition to the usual stipulations, he had been again, on that

occasion, solicited to relieve John Ballantyne and Co.'s stock to an

extent which he did not find quite convenient; and at all events he

had of late shown a considerable reluctance to employ James Ballantyne

and Co. as printers. One or other of these impediments is alluded to

in a note of Scott's, which, though undated, has been pasted into John

Ballantyne's private letter-book among the documents of the period in

question. It is in these words:--

DEAR JOHN,--I have seen the great swab, who is supple as a

glove, and will do ALL, which some interpret NOTHING.

However, we shall do well enough.

W. S.

Constable had been admitted, almost from the beginning, into the

_secret_ of the Novels--and for that, among {p.108} other reasons, it

would have been desirable for the Novelist to have him continue the

publisher without interruption; but Scott was led to suspect, that if

he were called upon to conclude a bargain for a fourth novel before

the third had made its appearance, his scruples as to the matter of

_printing_ might at least protract the treaty; and why Scott should

have been urgently desirous of seeing the transaction settled before

the expiration of the half-yearly term of Whitsunday is sufficiently

explained by the fact, that though so much of the old unfortunate

stock of John Ballantyne and Co. still remained on hand--and with it

some occasional recurrence of commercial difficulty as to floating

bills was to be expected--while James Ballantyne's management of the

pecuniary affairs of the printing-house had continued to be highly

negligent and irregular[37]--nevertheless, the sanguine author had

gone on purchasing one patch of land after another, until his estate

at Abbotsford had already grown from 150 to nearly 1000 acres. The

property all about his original farm had been in the hands of various

small holders (Scotticè _cock-lairds_;) these persons were sharp

enough to understand, erelong, that their neighbor could with

difficulty resist any temptation that might present itself in the

shape of an offer of more acres; and thus he proceeded buying up lot

after lot of unimproved ground, at extravagant prices,--his "appetite

increasing by what it fed on," while the ejected yeomen set themselves

down elsewhere, to fatten at their leisure upon the profits--most

commonly the anticipated profits--of "The Scotch Novels."

[Footnote 37: In February, 1816, when James Ballantyne

married, it is clearly proved by letters in his

handwriting, that he owed to Scott more than £3000 of

personal debt.--(1839.)]

He was ever and anon pulled up with a momentary misgiving,--and

resolved that the latest acquisition should be the last, until he

could get rid entirely of "John Ballantyne and Co." But John

Ballantyne was, {p.109} from the utter lightness of his mind, his

incapacity to look a day before him, and his eager impatience to enjoy

the passing hour, the very last man in the world who could, under such

circumstances, have been a serviceable agent. Moreover, John, too, had

his professional ambition: he was naturally proud of his connection,

however secondary, with the publication of these works--and this

connection, though subordinate, was still very profitable; he must

have suspected, that should his name disappear altogether from the

list of booksellers, it would be a very difficult matter for him to

retain any concern in them; and I cannot, on the whole, but consider

it as certain that, the first and more serious embarrassments being

overcome, he was far from continuing to hold by his patron's anxiety

for the total abolition of their unhappy copartnership. He, at all

events, unless when some sudden emergency arose, flattered Scott's own

gay imagination, by uniformly representing everything in the most

smiling colors; and though Scott, in his replies, seldom failed to

introduce some passing hint of caution--such as "_Nullum numen abest

si sit prudentia_"--he more and more took home to himself the

agreeable cast of his _Rigdum's_ anticipations, and wrote to him in a

vein as merry as his own;--_e. g._--"As for our stock,

"'T will be wearing awa', John,

Like snaw-wreaths when it's thaw, John," etc., etc., etc.

I am very sorry, in a word, to confess my conviction that John

Ballantyne, however volatile and light-headed, acted at this period

with cunning selfishness, both by Scott and by Constable. He well knew

that it was to Constable alone that his firm had more than once owed

its escape from utter ruin and dishonor; and he must also have known,

that had a fair straightforward effort been made for that purpose,

after the triumphant career of the Waverley series had once commenced,

nothing could have been more easy than to bring all the affairs of his

"back-stock," etc., to a complete close, by entering {p.110} into a

distinct and candid treaty on that subject, in connection with the

future works of the great Novelist, either with Constable or with any

other first-rate house in the trade. But John, foreseeing that, were

that unhappy concern quite out of the field, he must himself subside

into a mere clerk of the printing company, seems to have parried the

blow by the only arts of any consequence in which he ever was an

adept. He appears to have systematically disguised from Scott the

extent to which the whole Ballantyne concern had been sustained by

Constable--especially during his Hebridean tour of 1814, and his

Continental one of 1815--and prompted and enforced the idea of trying

other booksellers from time to time, instead of adhering to Constable,

merely for the selfish purposes,--first, of facilitating the immediate

discount of bills;--secondly, of further perplexing Scott's affairs,

the entire disentanglement of which would have been, as he fancied,

prejudicial to his own personal importance.

It was resolved, accordingly, to offer the risk and half profits of

the first edition of another new novel--or rather collection of

novels--not to Messrs. Constable, but to Mr. Murray of Albemarle

Street, and Mr. Blackwood, who was then Murray's agent in Scotland;

but it was at the same time resolved, partly because Scott wished to

try another experiment on the public sagacity, but partly also, no

question, from the wish to spare Constable's feelings, that the

title-page of the Tales of my Landlord should not bear the magical

words "By the Author of Waverley." The facility with which both Murray

and Blackwood embraced such a proposal, as no untried novelist, being

sane, could have dreamt of hazarding, shows that neither of them had

any doubt as to the identity of the author. They both considered the

withholding of the avowal on the forthcoming title-page as likely to

check very much the first success of the book; but they were both

eager to prevent Constable's acquiring {p.111} a sort of prescriptive

right to publish for the unrivalled novelist, and willing to disturb

his tenure at this additional, and, as they thought it, wholly

unnecessary risk.

How sharply the unseen parent watched this first negotiation of his

_Jedediah Cleishbotham_ will appear from one of his letters:--

TO MR. JOHN BALLANTYNE, HANOVER STREET, EDINBURGH.

ABBOTSFORD, April 29, 1816.

DEAR JOHN,--James has made one or two important mistakes in

the bargain with Murray and Blackwood. Briefly as follows:--

1stly, Having only authority from me to promise 6000 copies,

he proposes they shall have the copyright _forever_. I will

see their noses cheese first.

2dly, He proposes I shall have twelve months' bills--I have

always got six. However, I would not stand on that.

3dly, He talks of volumes being put into the publisher's

hands to consider and decide on. No such thing; a bare

perusal at St. John Street[38] only.

[Footnote 38: James Ballantyne's dwelling-house was then

in this street, adjoining the Canongate of Edinburgh.]

Then for omissions--It is NOT stipulated that we supply the

paper and print of successive editions. This must be nailed,

and not left to understanding.--Secondly, I will have London

bills as well as Blackwood's.

If they agree to these conditions, good and well. If they

demur, Constable must be instantly tried; giving half to the

Longmans, and _we_ drawing on _them_ for that moiety, or

Constable lodging their bill in our hands. You will

understand it is a four-volume touch--a work totally

different in style and structure from the others; a new

cast, in short, of the net which has hitherto made

miraculous draughts. I do not limit you to terms, because I

think you will make them better than I can do. {p.112} But

he must do more than others, since he will not or cannot

print with us. For every point but that, I would rather deal

with Constable than any one; he has always shown himself

spirited, judicious, and liberal. Blackwood must be brought

to the point _instantly_; and _whenever_ he demurs,

Constable must be treated with; for there is no use in

suffering the thing to be blown on. At the same time, you

need not conceal from him that there were some proposals

elsewhere, but you may add, with truth, I would rather close

with him. Yours truly,

W. S.

P. S.--I think Constable should jump at this affair; for I

believe the work will be very popular.

Messrs. Murray and Blackwood agreed to all the author's conditions

here expressed. They also relieved John Ballantyne and Co. of stock to

the value of £500; and at least Mr. Murray must, moreover, have

subsequently consented to anticipate the period of his payments. At

all events, I find, in a letter of Scott's, dated in the subsequent

August, this new echo of the old advice:--

TO MR. JOHN BALLANTYNE.

DEAR JOHN,--I have the pleasure to enclose Murray's

acceptances. I earnestly recommend to you to push, realizing

as much as you can.

"Consider weel, gude man,

We hae but borrowed gear;

The horse that I ride on,

It is John Murray's mear."

Yours truly,

W. SCOTT.

I know not how much of the tale of The Black Dwarf had been seen by

Blackwood, in St. John Street, before he concluded this bargain for

himself and his friend Murray; but when the closing sheets of that

novel {p.113} reached him, he considered them as by no means

sustaining the delightful promise of the opening ones. He was a man of

strong talents, and, though without anything that could be called

learning, of very respectable information--greatly superior to what

has, in this age, been common in his profession; acute, earnest,

eminently zealous in whatever he put his hand to; upright, honest,

sincere, and courageous. But as Constable owed his first introduction

to the upper world of literature and of society in general to his

Edinburgh Review, so did Blackwood his to the Magazine, which has now

made his name familiar to the world--and at the period of which I

write, that miscellany was unborn; he was known only as a diligent

antiquarian bookseller of the old town of Edinburgh, and the Scotch

agent of the great London publisher, Murray. The abilities, in short,

which he lived to develop, were as yet unsuspected--unless, perhaps,

among a small circle; and the knowledge of the world, which so few men

gather from anything but painful collision with various conflicting

orders of their fellow-men, was not his. He was to the last plain and

blunt; at this time I can easily believe him to have been so to a

degree which Scott might look upon as "ungracious"--I take the epithet

from one of his letters to James Ballantyne. Mr. Blackwood, therefore,

upon reading what seemed to him the lame and impotent conclusion of a

well-begun story, did not search about for any glossy periphrase, but

at once requested James Ballantyne to inform the unknown author that

such was his opinion. This might possibly have been endured; but

Blackwood, feeling, I have no doubt, a genuine enthusiasm for the

author's fame, as well as a just tradesman's anxiety as to his own

adventure, proceeded to suggest the outline of what would, in his

judgment, be a better upwinding of the plot of The Black Dwarf, and

concluded with announcing his willingness, in case the proposed

alteration were agreed to, that the whole expense of cancelling

{p.114} and reprinting a certain number of sheets should be charged

to his own account. He appears to have further indicated that he had

taken counsel with some literary person, on whose taste he placed

great reliance, and who, if he had not originated, at least approved

of the proposed process of recasting. Had Scott never possessed any

such system of inter-agency as the Ballantynes supplied, he would,

among other and perhaps greater inconveniences, have escaped that of

the want of personal familiarity with several persons, with whose

confidence,--and why should I not add?--with the innocent

gratification of whose little vanities--his own pecuniary interests

were often deeply connected. A very little personal contact would have

introduced such a character as Blackwood's to the respect, nay, to the

affectionate respect, of Scott, who, above all others, was ready to

sympathize cordially with honest and able men, in whatever condition

of life he discovered them. He did both know and appreciate Blackwood

better in after-times; but in 1816, when this communication reached

him, the name was little more than a name, and his answer to the most

solemn of go-betweens was in these terms, which I sincerely wish I

could tell how Signior Aldiborontiphoscophornio translated into any

dialect submissible to Blackwood's apprehension:--

DEAR JAMES,--

I have received Blackwood's impudent proposal. G---- d----

his soul! Tell him and his coadjutor that I belong to the

Black Hussars of Literature, who neither give nor receive

criticism. I'll be cursed but this is the most impudent

proposal that ever was made.

W. S.[39]

[Footnote 39: _May_, 1839. Since this book was first

published, I have received from the representatives of

Mr. Blackwood several documents which throw light on the

transaction here mentioned. It will be apparent from one

of those I am about to quote, that Blackwood, before he

sent his message to Jedediah Cleishbotham, had

ascertained that no less a person than Mr. Gifford

concurred in his opinion--nay, that James Ballantyne

himself took the same view of the matter. But the reader

will be not less amused in comparing the "Black

Hussar's" missive in the text, with the edition of it

which actually reached Blackwood--and which certainly

justifies the conjecture I had ventured to express.

TO WILLIAM BLACKWOOD, ESQ.

EDINBURGH, 4th October, 1816.

MY DEAR SIR,--Our application to the author of _Tales of my

Landlord_ has been anything but successful; and in order to

explain to you the reason why I must decline to address him

in this way in future, I shall copy his answer _verbatim_:--

"My respects to our friends the Booksellers. I belong to the

Death-head Hussars of Literature, who neither _take_ nor

_give_ criticism. I am extremely sorry they showed my work

to Gifford, nor would I cancel a leaf to please all the

critics of Edinburgh and London; and so let that be as it

is: They are mistaken if they think I don't know when I am

writing ill, as well as Gifford can tell me. I beg there may

be no more communications with critics."

Observe--that I shall at all times be ready to convey

anything from you to the author in a written form, but I do

not feel warranted to interfere farther.

Yours very truly,

J. BALLANTYNE.

TO JAMES BALLANTYNE, ESQ.

EDINBURGH, 5th October, 1816.

MY DEAR SIR,--I am not a little vexed at having ventured to

suggest anything to the author of the _Tales of my

Landlord_, since I find he considers it in the light of

_sutor ultra crepidam_. I never had for one moment the

vanity to think, that from any poor remark of mine, or

indeed of any human being, he would be induced to blot one

line or alter a single incident, unless the same idea

occurred to his own powerful mind. On stating to you what

struck me, and finding that your opinion coincided with

mine, I was induced to request of you to state it to the

author, in order that he might be aware that the expense of

cancelling the sheets was no object to me. I was the more

anxious to do this, in case the author should have given you

the MS. of this portion of the work sooner than he intended,

in order to satisfy the clamoring for it which I teased you

with. I trust the author will do me the justice to believe

that it is quite impossible for any one to have a higher

admiration of his most extraordinary talents; and speaking

merely as a bookseller, it would be quite unnecessary to be

at the expense of altering even one line, although the

author himself (who alone can be the proper judge) should

wish it, as the success of the work must be rapid, great,

and certain.

With regard to the first volume having been shown to Mr.

Gifford, I must state in justification of Mr. Murray, that

Mr. G. is the only friend whom he consults on all occasions,

and to whom his most secret transactions are laid open. He

gave him the work, not for the purpose of criticism, but

that as a friend he might partake of the enjoyment he had in

such an extraordinary performance. No language could be

stronger than Mr. Gifford's, as I mentioned to you; and as

the same thing had occurred to Mr. G. as to you and me, you

thought there would be no harm in stating this to the

author.

I have only again to express my regret at what has taken

place, and to beg you will communicate this to the author in

any way you may think proper.

Yours, etc.,

W. BLACKWOOD.

(A much fuller and more accurate knowledge of this whole

transaction, than that possessed by Lockhart, can be

gathered from the annals of the two great publishing

houses concerned in it;--Smiles's _Memoir of John

Murray_ (vol. i. chap. xviii.), and Mrs. Oliphant's

_William Blackwood and his Sons_ (vol. i. pp. 56-92),

especially from the latter work, in which the whole

incident is set in its proper light. Notwithstanding the

heavy preliminary tax for unsalable books from the

Ballantynes' "wretched stock," neither publisher seems

to have had a moment's doubt as to the acceptance of the

offer of the ostensibly anonymous Work of Fiction,

though they were much fretted by the delays,

uncertainties, and mysteries attending the matter. "One

in business must submit to many things, and swallow many

a bitter pill, when such a man as Walter Scott is the

object in view," writes Blackwood to Murray,--the

bitterness being largely the dealing with James

Ballantyne. "John I always considered as no better than

a swindler, but James I put some trust and confidence

in. You judged him more accurately." ... And on another

occasion,--"Except my wife, there is not a friend whom I

dare advise with. I have not ventured to mention the

business to my brother on account of the cursed

mysteries and injunctions of secrecy connected with it.

I know he would blame me for engaging in it, for he has

a very small opinion of the Ballantynes." Apart from the

vexations attending their office as intermediaries, for

which the Ballantynes were only partially responsible,

this shrewd, if irritated, observer appears to have

formed opinions of the brothers as business men, in some

respects not differing greatly from those held by

Lockhart in later days.

The delight of the two publishers in at last receiving

the MS. of _The Black Dwarf_ and the manner in which it

passed into the hands of Constable, even before the

stipulated 6000 copies were disposed of,--it must be

owned he treated his rivals somewhat unhandsomely,

finally severing them from Scott's literary career,--are

fully set forth by the historian of the House of

Blackwood. With her "one cannot but feel that this was

one of those tragically insignificant circumstances

which so often shape life apart from any consciousness

of ours. Probably ruin would never have overtaken Sir

Walter had he been in the steady and careful hands of

Murray and Blackwood, for it is unlikely that even the

glamour of the great Magician would have turned heads so

reasonable and sober.")]

{p.115} While these volumes were in progress, Scott found time to make

an excursion into Perthshire and Dumbartonshire, {p.116} for the sake

of showing the scenery, made famous in The Lady of the Lake and

Waverley, to his {p.117} wife's old friends, Miss Dumergue and Mrs.

Sarah Nicolson,[40] who had never before been in Scotland. The account

which he gives of these ladies' visit at Abbotsford, and this little

tour, in a letter to Mr. Morritt, shows the "Black Hussar of

Literature" in his gentler and more habitual mood.

[Footnote 40: The sister of Miss Jane Nicolson.--See

_ante_, vol. i. p. 248. Vol. ii. p. 82.]

TO J. B. S. MORRITT, ESQ., M. P., ROKEBY PARK.

ABBOTSFORD, 21st August, 1816.

MY DEAR MORRITT,--I have not had a moment's kindly leisure

to answer your kind letter, and to tell how delighted I

shall be to see you in this least of all possible dwellings,

but where we, nevertheless, can contrive a pilgrim's

quarters and the warmest welcome for you and any friend of

your journey;--if young Stanley, so much the better. Now, as

to the important business with the which I have been

occupied: You are to know we have had our kind hostesses of

Piccadilly upon a two months' visit to us. We owed them so

much hospitality, that we were particularly anxious to make

Scotland agreeable to the good girls. But, alas, the wind

has blown, and the rain has fallen, in a style which beats

all that ever I remembered. We accomplished, with some

difficulty, a visit to Loch Katrine and Loch Lomond, and, by

dint of the hospitality of Cambusmore and the Ross, we

defied bad weather, wet roads, and long walks. But the

weather settled into regular tempest, when we settled at

Abbotsford; and, though the natives, accustomed to bad

weather (though not at such a time of year), contrived to

brave the extremities of the season, it only served to

increase the dismay of our unlucky visitors, who, accustomed

only to Paris and London, expected _fiacres_ at the

Milestane Cross, and a pair of oars at the Deadman's Haugh.

Add to this a strong disposition to _commérage_, when there

was no possibility of gratifying it, and a {p.118} total

indisposition to scenery or rural amusements, which were all

we had to offer--and you will pity both hosts and guests. I

have the gratification to think I fully supported the

hospitality of my country. I walked them to death, I talked

them to death, I showed them landscapes which the driving

rain hardly permitted them to see, and told them of feuds

about which they cared as little as I do about their

next-door news in Piccadilly. Yea, I even played at cards,

and as I had Charlotte for a partner, so ran no risk of

being scolded, I got on pretty well. Still the weather was

so execrable, that, as the old drunken landlord used to say

at Arroquhar, "I was perfectly ashamed of it;" and, to this

moment, I wonder how my two friends fought it out so

patiently as they did. But the young people and the cottages

formed considerable resources. Yesterday they left us,

deeply impressed with the conviction, which I can hardly

blame, that the sun never shone in Scotland,--which that

noble luminary seems disposed to confirm, by making this the

first fair day we have seen this month--so that his beams

will greet them at Longtown, as if he were determined to put

Scotland to utter shame.

In you I expect a guest of a different calibre; and I think

(barring downright rain) I can promise you some sport of one

kind or other. We have a good deal of game about us; and

Walter, to whom I have resigned my gun and license, will be

an excellent attendant. He brought in six brace of moor-fowl

on the 12th, which had (_si fas est diceri_) its own effect

in softening the minds of our guests towards this unhappy

climate. In other respects things look melancholy enough

here. Corn is, however, rising, and the poor have plenty of

work, and wages which, though greatly inferior to what they

had when hands were scarce, assort perfectly well with the

present state of the markets. Most folks try to live as much

on their own produce as they can, by way of fighting off

distress; and though speculating {p.119} farmers and

landlords must suffer, I think the temporary ague-fit will,

on the whole, be advantageous to the country. It will check

that inordinate and unbecoming spirit of expense, or rather

extravagance, which was poisoning all classes, and bring us

back to the sober virtues of our ancestors. It will also

have the effect of teaching the landed interest, that their

connection with their farmers should be of a nature more

intimate than that of mere payment and receipt of rent, and

that the largest offerer for a lease is often the person

least entitled to be preferred as a tenant. Above all, it

will complete the destruction of those execrable quacks,

terming themselves land-doctors, who professed, from a two

days' scamper over your estate, to tell you its

constitution,--in other words its value,--acre by acre.

These men, paid according to the golden hopes they held out,

afforded by their reports one principal means of deceiving

both landlord and tenant, by setting an ideal and

extravagant value upon land, which seemed to entitle the one

to expect, and the other to offer, rent far beyond what any

expectation formed by either, upon their own acquaintance

with the property, could rationally have warranted. More

than one landed gentleman has cursed, in my presence, the

day he ever consulted one of those empirics, whose

prognostications induced him to reject the offers of

substantial men, practically acquainted with the _locale_.

Ever, my dear Morritt, most truly yours,

Walter SCOTT.

In October, 1816, appeared the Edinburgh Annual Register, containing

Scott's historical sketch of the year 1814--a composition which would

occupy at least four such volumes as the reader has now in his

hand.[41] Though executed with extraordinary rapidity, the sketch is

as clear as spirited; but I need say no more of it here, as the author

travels mostly over the same ground again in his Life of Napoleon.

[Footnote 41: [Referring to the edition of 1839, in ten

volumes.]]

{p.120} Scott's correspondence proves, that during this autumn he had

received many English guests besides the good spinsters of Piccadilly

and Mr. Morritt. I regret to add, it also proves that he had continued

all the while to be annoyed with calls for money from John Ballantyne;

yet before the 12th of November called him to Edinburgh, he appears to

have nearly finished the first Tales of my Landlord. He had, moreover,

concluded a negotiation with Constable and Longman for a series of

Letters on the History of Scotland: of which, however, if he ever

wrote any part, the MS. has not been discovered. It is probable that

he may have worked some detached fragments into his long-subsequent

Tales of a Grandfather.[42] The following letter shows likewise that

he was now busy with plans of building at Abbotsford, and deep in

consultation on that subject with an artist eminent for his skill in

Gothic architecture,--Mr. Edward Blore:--

[Footnote 42: [Scott says in a letter to John Murray,

written October 20, 1814: "In casting about how I might

show you some mark of my sense of former kindness, a

certain MS. History of Scotland in _Letters to my

Children_ has occurred to me, which I consider as a

desideratum; it is upon the plan of _Lord Lyttelton's

Letters_, as they are called." Nearly a year later he

returns to the subject, and says: "I intend to revise my

letters on Scottish History for you, but I will not get

to press till November, for the country affords no

facilities for consulting the necessary authorities. I

hope it may turn out a thing of some interest, though I

rather intend to keep to its original purpose as a book

of instruction to children." These references seem to

show that the work may have been further advanced than

Lockhart supposed. The announcement of the proposed book

by Constable and Longman naturally excited the

indignation of Blackwood and Murray, as is shown in a

vigorous letter from the Edinburgh to the London

publisher, blaming equally the Ballantynes and

Constable.--See _Memoirs of John Murray_, vol. i. pp.

245, 246, 462.]]

TO DANIEL TERRY, ESQ.

November 12, 1816.

MY DEAR TERRY,--I have been shockingly negligent in

acknowledging your repeated favors; but it so happened, that

I have had very little to _say_, with a great {p.121} deal

to _do_; so that I trusted to your kindness to forgive my

apparent want of kindness, and indisputable lack of

punctuality. You will readily suppose that I have heard with

great satisfaction of the prosperity of your household,

particularly of the good health of my little namesake and

his mother. Godmothers of yore used to be fairies; and

though only a godfather, I think of sending you, one day, a

_fairy_ gift--a little drama, namely, which, if the audience

be indulgent, may be of use to him. Of course, you will

stand godfather to it yourself: it is yet only in embryo--a

sort of poetical Hans in Kelder--nor am I sure when I can

bring him forth; not for this season, at any rate. You will

receive, in the course of a few days, my late _whereabouts_

in four volumes: there are two tales--the last of which I

really prefer to any fictitious narrative I have yet been

able to produce--the first is wish-washy enough. The subject

of the second tale lies among the old Scottish

Cameronians--nay, I'll tickle ye off a Covenanter as readily

as old Jack could do a young Prince; and a rare fellow he

is, when brought forth in his true colors. Were it not for

the necessity of using Scriptural language, which is

essential to the character, but improper for the stage, it

would be very dramatic. But of all this you will judge by

and by. To give the go-by to the public, I have doubled and

leaped into my form, like a hare in snow: that is, I have

changed my publisher, and come forth like a maiden knight's

white shield (there is a conceit!) without any adhesion to

fame gained in former adventures (another!) or, in other

words, with a virgin title-page (another!)--I should not be

so light-hearted about all this, but that it is very nearly

finished and out, which is always a blithe moment for Mr.

Author. And now to other matters. The books came safe, and

were unpacked two days since, on our coming to town--most

ingeniously were they stowed in the legs of the very

handsome stand for Lord Byron's vase, with which our

{p.122} friend George Bullock has equipped me. I was made

very happy to receive him at Abbotsford, though only for a

start; and no less so to see Mr. Blore, from whom I received

your last letter. He is a very fine young man, modest,

simple, and unaffected in his manners, as well as a most

capital artist. I have had the assistance of both these

gentlemen in arranging an addition to the cottage at

Abbotsford, intended to connect the present farmhouse with

the line of low buildings to the right of it. Mr. Bullock

will show you the plan, which I think is very ingenious. He

has promised to give it his consideration with respect to

the interior; and Mr. Blore has drawn me a very handsome

elevation, both to the road and to the river. I expect to

get some decorations from the old Tolbooth of Edinburgh,

particularly the cope-stones of the doorway, or lintels, as

we call them, and a _niche_ or two--one very handsome

indeed! Better get a niche _from_ the Tolbooth than a niche

_in_ it, to which such building operations are apt to bring

the projectors. This addition will give me: first, a

handsome boudoir, in which I intend to place Mr. Bullock's

Shakespeare,[43] with his superb cabinet, which serves as a

pedestal. This opens into the little drawing-room, to which

it serves as a chapel of ease; and on the other side, to a

handsome dining-parlor of 27 feet by 18, with three windows

to the north, and one to the south,--the last to be Gothic,

and filled with stained glass. Besides these commodities,

there is a small conservatory or greenhouse; and a study for

myself, which we design to fit up with ornaments from

Melrose Abbey. Bullock made several casts with his own

hands--masks, and so forth, delightful for cornices, etc.

[Footnote 43: A cast from the monumental effigy at

Stratford-upon-Avon--now in the library at

Abbotsford--was the gift of Mr. George Bullock, long

distinguished in London as a collector of curiosities.

This ingenious man was, as the reader will see in the

sequel, a great favorite with Scott.]

Do not let Mrs. Terry think of the windows till little

{p.123} Wat is duly cared after.[44] I am informed by Mr.

Blore that he is a fine thriving fellow, very like papa.

About my armorial bearings: I will send you a correct

drawing as I can get hold of Blore; namely--of the

scutcheons of my grandsires on each side, and my own. I

could detail them in the jargon of heraldry, but it is

better to speak to your eyes by translating them into

colored drawings, as the sublime science of armory has

fallen into some neglect of late years, with all its

mascles, buckles, crescents, and boars of the first, second,

third, and fourth.

[Footnote 44: Mrs. Terry had offered the services of her

elegant pencil in designing some windows of painted

glass for Scott's armory, etc.]

I was very sorry I had no opportunity of showing attention

to your friend Mr. Abbot, not being in town at the time. I

grieve to say that neither the genius of Kean nor the charms

of Miss O'Neill could bring me from the hillside and the

sweet society of Tom Purdie. All our family are very

well--Walter as tall nearly as I am, fishing salmon and

shooting moor-fowl and blackcock, in good style; the girls

growing up, and, as yet, not losing their simplicity of

character; little Charles excellent at play, and not

deficient at learning, when the young dog will take pains.

Abbotsford is looking pretty at last, and the planting is

making some show. I have now several hundred acres thereof,

running out as far as beyond the lake. We observe with great

pleasure the steady rise which you make in public opinion,

and expect, one day, to hail you stage-manager. Believe me,

my dear Terry, always very much yours,

W. SCOTT.

P. S.--The Counsellor and both the Ballantynes are well and

hearty.

On the first of December, the first series of the Tales of my Landlord

appeared, and notwithstanding the silence of the title-page, and the

change of publishers, and {p.124} the attempt which had certainly

been made to vary the style both of delineation and of language, all

doubts whether they were or were not from the same hand with Waverley

had worn themselves out before the lapse of a week.--The enthusiasm of

their reception among the highest literary circles of London may be

gathered from the following letter:--

TO WALTER SCOTT, ESQ., EDINBURGH.

ALBEMARLE STREET, 14th December, 1816.

DEAR SIR,--Although I dare not address you as the author of

certain "Tales" (which, however, must be written either by

Walter Scott or the Devil), yet nothing can restrain me from

thinking it is to your influence with the author that I am

indebted for the essential honor of being one of their

publishers, and I must intrude upon you to offer my most

hearty thanks--not divided, but doubled--alike for my

worldly gain therein, and for the great acquisition of

professional reputation which their publication has already

procured me. I believe I might, under any oath that could be

proposed, swear that I never experienced such unmixed

pleasure as the reading of this exquisite work has afforded

me; and if you could see me, as the author's literary

chamberlain, receiving the unanimous and vehement praises of

every one who has read it, and the curses of those whose

needs my scanty supply could not satisfy, you might judge of

the sincerity with which I now entreat you to assure him of

the most complete success. Lord Holland said, when I asked

his opinion--"Opinion! We did not one of us go to bed last

night--nothing slept but my gout." Frere, Hallam,

Boswell,[45] Lord Glenbervie, William Lamb,[46] all agree

that it surpasses all the other novels. Gifford's estimate

is increased at every reperusal. Heber says there are only

two men in the world--Walter Scott and Lord Byron. Between

you, you have given existence to a third--Ever your faithful

servant,

John MURRAY.

[Footnote 45: The late James Boswell, Esq., of the

Temple--second son of _Bozzy_.]

[Footnote 46: The Honorable William Lamb--now Lord

Melbourne.]

To this cordial effusion Scott returned the following answer. It was

necessary, since he had fairly resolved {p.125} against compromising

his incognito, that he should be prepared not only to repel the

impertinent curiosity of strangers, but to evade the proffered

congratulations of overflowing kindness. He contrived, however, to do

so, on this and all similar occasions, in a style of equivoque which

could never be seriously misunderstood:[47]--

[Footnote 47: [Even such keen observers as Murray and

Blackwood had their intervals of doubt regarding the

authorship of the Novels. In June, 1816, Blackwood

writes: "There have been various rumors with regard to

Greenfield being the author, but I never paid much

attention to it; the thing appeared to me so very

improbable.... But from what I have heard lately, and

from what you state, I now begin to think that

Greenfield may probably be the author." And only a month

after the date of his letter to Scott, here given,

Murray writes to Blackwood:--

"I can assure you, but _in the greatest confidence_,

that I have discovered the author of all these Novels to

be Thomas Scott, Walter Scott's brother. He is now in

Canada. I have no doubt but that Mr. Walter Scott did a

great deal to the first Waverley Novel, because of his

anxiety to save his brother, and his doubt about the

success of the work. This accounts for the many stories

about it. Many persons had previously heard from Mr.

Scott, but you may rely upon the certainty of what I

have told you." By this time Blackwood is firm in the

faith of Scott's authorship; but Bernard Barton writes

to Murray that he has heard that James Hogg is the

author of _Tales of my Landlord_, and that he has had

intimation from himself to that effect; while Lady

Mackintosh is informed on excellent authority that the

writer is Mrs. Thomas Scott. Writing to Blackwood in

February, 1817, Murray avers,--"I will believe, till

within an inch of my life, that the author of _Tales of

my Landlord_ is Thomas Scott."--See Smiles's _Memoir of

John Murray_, vol. i. pp. 461, 473, 474.]]

TO JOHN MURRAY, ESQ., ALBEMARLE STREET, LONDON.

EDINBURGH, 18th December, 1816.

MY DEAR SIR,--I give you heartily joy of the success of the

Tales, although I do not claim that paternal interest in

them which my friends do me the credit to assign me. I

assure you I have never read a volume of them until they

were printed, and can only join with the rest of the world

in applauding the true and striking portraits which they

present of old Scottish manners. I do not expect implicit

reliance to be placed on my disavowal, because I know very

well that he who is disposed not to own a work must

necessarily deny it, and that otherwise {p.126} his secret

would be at the mercy of all who choose to ask the question,

since silence in such a case must always pass for consent,

or rather assent. But I have a mode of convincing you that I

am perfectly serious in my denial--pretty similar to that by

which Solomon distinguished the fictitious from the real

mother--and that is, by reviewing the work, which I take to

be an operation equal to that of quartering the child. But

this is only on condition I can have Mr. Erskine's

assistance, who admires the work greatly more than I do,

though I think the painting of the second Tale both true and

powerful. I knew Old Mortality very well; his name was

Paterson, but few knew him otherwise than by his nickname.

The first Tale is not very original in its concoction, and

lame and impotent in its conclusion. My love to Gifford. I

have been over head and ears in work this summer, or I would

have sent the Gypsies; indeed I was partly stopped by

finding it impossible to procure a few words of their

language.

Constable wrote to me about two months since, desirous of

having a new edition of Paul; but not hearing from you, I

conclude you are still on hand. Longman's people had then

only sixty copies.

Kind compliments to Heber, whom I expected at Abbotsford

this summer; also to Mr. Croker and all your four o'clock

visitors. I am just going to Abbotsford to make a small

addition to my premises there. I have now about 700 acres,

thanks to the booksellers and the discerning public. Yours

truly,

Walter SCOTT.

P. S.--I have much to ask about Lord Byron if I had time.

The third canto of the Childe is inimitable. Of the last

poems, there are one or two which indicate rather an

irregular play of imagination.[48] What a pity that a man of

such exquisite genius will not be contented {p.127} to be

happy on the ordinary terms![49] I declare my heart bleeds

when I think of him, self-banished from the country to which

he is an honor.[50]

[Footnote 48: _Parisina_--_The Dream_--and the "Domestic

Pieces," had been recently published.]

[Footnote 49: (On November 27 Scott had written to

Joanna Baillie, who had just returned from a tour on the

Continent:--

"All I ever longed for on the Continent was their light

wines, which you do not care about, and their fine

climate, which we should both value equally; and to say

truth, I never saw scene or palace which shook my

allegiance to Tweedside and Abbotsford, though so

inferior in every respect, and though the hills, or

rather braes, are just high enough 'to lift us to the

storm' when the storms are not so condescending as to

sweep both crest and base, which, to do them justice, is

seldom the case. What have I got to send you?... Alas,

nothing but the history of petty employments and a

calendar of increasing bad weather. The latter was much

mitigated by enjoying for a good portion of the summer

the society of John Morritt, of Rokeby, who has so much

of that which is delightful, both in his grave and gay

moods, that he can make us forget the hillside while

sitting by the fireside. His late loss has cast a

general shade of melancholy over him, which renders him

yet dearer to his friends, by the gentle and unaffected

manner in which his natural gayety of temper gleams

through it and renders it still more interesting....

"A far different object of interest, yet still of

interest, checkered with pity and disapprobation, is

Lord Byron, whose present situation seems to rival all

that ever has been said and sung of the misfortunes of a

too irritable imagination. The last part of _Childe

Harold_ intimates a terrible state of mind, and with all

the power and genius which characterized his former

productions, the present seems to indicate a more

serious and desperate degree of misanthropy. I own I was

not much moved by the scorn of the world which his first

poems implied, because I know it is a humor of mind

which those whom fortune has spoilt by indulgence, or

irritated by reverses, are apt to assume, because it

looks melancholy and gentlemanlike, and becomes a bard

as well as being desperately in love, or very fond of

the sunrise, though he lies in bed till noon, or anxious

in recommending to others to catch cold by visiting old

abbeys by moonlight, which he never happened to see

under the chaste moonbeam himself; but this strange poem

goes much deeper, and either the Demon of Misanthropy is

in full possession of him, or he has already invited ten

guests, equally desperate, to the swept and garnished

mansion of Harold's understanding."--_Familiar Letters_,

vol. i. p. 369.)]

[Footnote 50: [This is probably the "expression of

kindness" which encouraged Murray to beg Scott to review

in the _Quarterly_ Byron's recently published volumes,

_Childe Harold, Canto III._, and _The Prisoner of

Chillon, a Dream, and Other Poems_. The request was

promptly complied with, and the article appeared in the

next number issued (_dated_ October, 1816),--a review

full of generous, and also judicious, appreciation. For

some reason, hard now to discover, unless it were the

kindliness of the writer's tone towards the younger

poet, some of Lady Byron's friends, among whom was

Joanna Baillie, seem to have taken strong exception to

the paper, and Miss Baillie wrote to Scott at some

length on the matter, even animadverting upon the purely

literary criticism of the reviewer. Much of the

correspondence which ensued, including a characteristic

letter from Lady Byron, can be found in the _Familiar

Letters_ (vol. i. pp. 413-422).

Of the review, Byron writes to Murray (March 3, 1817):--

... "It seems to me (as far as the subject of it may be

permitted to judge) to be _very well_ written as a

composition, and ... even those who may condemn its

partiality, must praise its generosity. The temptations

to take another and less favorable view of the question

have been so great and numerous, that, what with public

opinion, politics, etc., he must be a gallant as well as

a good man, who has ventured in that place and at this

time to write such an article even anonymously. Such

things, however, are their own reward; and I even

flatter myself that the writer, whoever he may be (and I

have no guess), will not regret that the perusal of this

has given me as much gratification as any composition of

that nature could give, and more than any other has ever

given,--and I have had a good many in my time of one

kind or the other. It is not the mere praise, but there

is a tact and a delicacy throughout, not only with

regard to me, but to others, which, as it has not been

observed elsewhere, I had till now doubted, whether it

could be observed anywhere." He writes a few weeks

later, on learning that Scott wrote the article: ... "It

cannot add to my good opinion of him, but it adds to

that of myself."--_Letters and Journals of Lord Byron_

(1900), vol. iv. pp. 63, 85.]]

{p.128} Mr. Murray, gladly embracing this offer of an article for his

journal on the Tales of my Landlord, begged Scott to take a wider

scope, and dropping all respect for the idea of a divided parentage,

to place together any materials he might have for the illustration of

the Waverley Novels in general; he suggested in particular, that,

instead of drawing up a long-promised disquisition on the Gypsies in a

separate shape, whatever he had to say concerning that picturesque

generation might be introduced by way of comment on the character of

Meg Merrilies. What Scott's original conception had been I know not;

he certainly gave his reviewal all the breadth which Murray could have

wished, and, _inter alia_, diversified it with a few anecdotes of the

Scottish Gypsies. But the late excellent biographer of John Knox, Dr.

Thomas M'Crie, had, in the mean time, considered the representation of

the Covenanters, in the story of Old Mortality, as so unfair as to

demand at his {p.129} hands a very serious rebuke. The Doctor

forthwith published, in a magazine called the Edinburgh Christian

Instructor, a set of papers, in which the historical foundations of

that tale were attacked with indignant warmth; and though Scott, when

he first heard of these invectives, expressed his resolution never

even to read them, he found the impression they were producing so

strong, that he soon changed his purpose, and finally devoted a very

large part of his article for the Quarterly Review to an elaborate

defence of his own picture of the Covenanters.[51]

[Footnote 51: Since I have mentioned this reviewal, I

may as well, to avoid recurrence to it, express here my

conviction, that Erskine, not Scott, was the author of

the critical estimate of the Waverley Novels which it

embraces--although, for the purpose of mystification,

Scott had taken the trouble to transcribe the paragraphs

in which that estimate is contained. At the same time I

cannot but add that, had Scott really been the sole

author of this reviewal, he need not have incurred the

severe censure which has been applied to his supposed

conduct in the matter. After all, his judgment of his

own works must have been allowed to be not above, but

very far under the mark; and the whole affair would, I

think, have been considered by every candid person

exactly as the letter about Solomon and the rival

mothers was by Murray, Gifford, and the "four o'clock

visitors" of Albemarle Street--as a good joke. A better

joke, certainly, than the allusion to the report of

Thomas Scott being the real author of Waverley, at the

close of the article, was never penned; and I think it

includes a confession over which a misanthrope might

have chuckled: "We intended here to conclude this long

article, when a strong report reached us of certain

Transatlantic confessions, which, if genuine (though of

this we know nothing), assign a different author to

these volumes than the party suspected by our Scottish

correspondents. Yet a critic may be excused seizing upon

the nearest suspicious person, on the principle happily

expressed by Claverhouse, in a letter to the Earl of

Linlithgow. He had been, it seems, in search of a gifted

weaver, who used to hold forth at conventicles: 'I sent

for the webster (weaver), they brought in his _brother_

for him: though he, maybe, cannot preach like his

brother, I doubt not but he is as well-principled as he,

wherefore I thought it would be no great fault to give

him the trouble to go to jail with the

rest!'"--_Miscellaneous Prose Works_, vol. xix. pp. 85,

86.]

Before the first Tales of my Landlord were six weeks old, two editions

of 2000 copies disappeared, and a third of 2000 was put to press; but

notwithstanding this rapid success, which was still further continued,

and the friendly relations which always subsisted between the {p.130}

author and Mr. Murray, circumstances erelong occurred which carried

the publication of the work into the hands of Messrs. Constable.

The author's answer to Dr. M'Crie, and his Introduction of 1830, have

exhausted the historical materials on which he constructed his Old

Mortality; and the origin of The Black Dwarf--as to the conclusion of

which story he appears on reflection to have completely adopted the

opinion of honest Blackwood--has already been sufficiently illustrated

by an anecdote of his early wanderings in Tweeddale. The latter tale,

however imperfect, and unworthy as a work of art to be placed high in

the catalogue of his productions, derives a singular interest from its

delineation of the dark feelings so often connected with physical

deformity; feelings which appear to have diffused their shadow over

the whole genius of Byron--and which, but for this single picture, we

should hardly have conceived ever to have passed through Scott's

happier mind.[52] All the bitter blasphemy of spirit which, from

infancy to the tomb, swelled up in Byron against the unkindness of

nature; which sometimes perverted even his filial love into a

sentiment of diabolical malignity; all this black and desolate train

of reflections must have been encountered and deliberately subdued by

the manly parent of The Black Dwarf. Old Mortality, on the other hand,

is remarkable as the _novelist's_ first attempt to repeople the past

by the power of imagination working on materials furnished by books.

In Waverley he revived the fervid dreams of his boyhood, and drew, not

from printed records, but from the artless oral narratives of his

_Invernahyles_. In Guy Mannering and The Antiquary he embodied

characters and manners familiar {p.131} to his own wandering youth.

But whenever his letters mention Old Mortality in its progress, they

represent him as strong in the confidence that the industry with which

he had pored over a library of forgotten tracts would enable him to

identify himself with the time in which they had birth, as completely

as if he had listened with his own ears to the dismal sermons of

Peden, ridden with Claverhouse and Dalzell in the rout of Bothwell,

and been an advocate at the bar of the Privy Council, when Lauderdale

catechised and tortured the assassins of Archbishop Sharp. To

reproduce a departed age with such minute and lifelike accuracy as

this tale exhibits, demanded a far more energetic sympathy of

imagination than had been called for in any effort of his serious

verse. It is indeed most curiously instructive for any student of art

to compare the Roundheads of Rokeby with the Bluebonnets of Old

Mortality. For the rest--the story is framed with a deeper skill than

any of the preceding novels: the canvas is a broader one; the

characters are contrasted and projected with a power and felicity

which neither he nor any other master ever surpassed; and,

notwithstanding all that has been urged against him as a disparager of

the Covenanters, it is to me very doubtful whether the inspiration of

romantic chivalry ever prompted him to nobler emotions than he has

lavished on the re-animation of their stern and solemn enthusiasm.

This work has always appeared to me the Marmion of his novels.[53]

[Footnote 52: [On reading _The Black Dwarf_, Mrs. Leigh

believed her brother to be the author, and wrote to him

to that effect. Byron had not yet seen the book, and

says in his reply: "I am not P. P. [Peter Pattieson], I

assure you on my honor, and do not understand to what

book you allude, so that all your compliments are quite

thrown away."--Byron's _Letters and Journals_ (1900),

vol. iv. p. 56.]]

[Footnote 53: [Lady Louisa Stuart, whose approbation

Scott writes he values "beyond a whole wilderness of

critics," says in a letter of December 5, 1816:

"[Old Mortality] is super-excellent in all its points;

it breaks up fresh ground, and has all the raciness of

originality. I cannot help thinking it will bear down

the world before it triumphantly. As usual it makes its

personages our intimate acquaintance, and its scenes so

present to the eye, that, last night, after sitting up

unreasonably late over it, I got no sleep, from a kind

of fever of mind it had occasioned. It seemed as if I

had been an eye and ear witness of all the passages, and

I could not lull the agitation into calmness. Mause and

Cuddie hurried my spirits in another way; they forced me

to laugh out aloud, which one seldom does alone. On a

second slower reading I expect to be still better

pleased, and then also I suppose I shall find out the

faults. At present it has, in the Scotch phrase, 'taken

me off my feet,' and I do not criticise, though I think

you will believe me when I say I do not and will not

flatter. One thing I regret, that like the author of

_The Antiquary_, Jedediah did not add a glossary;

because even I, a mongrel, occasionally paying long

visits to Scotland, and hearing Girsy at Bothwell gate

and Peggy Macgowan hold forth in the village,--even I,

thus qualified, have found a great many words absolute

Hebrew to me, and I fear the altogether English will

find many more beyond their comprehension or conjecture.

But this may be remedied in another edition. I have as

yet only one great attack to make, and that upon a

single word; but such a word! such an anachronism!

Claverhouse says he has no time to hear _sentimental_

speeches. My dear sir! tell Jedediah that Claverhouse

never heard the sound of those four syllables in his

life. We are used to them; but _sentiment_ and

_sentimental_ were, I believe, first introduced into the

language by Sterne, and are hardly as old as I am. Let

alone the Covenanters' days, I am persuaded you would

look in vain for them in the works of Richardson and

Fielding. Nay, the French, from whom they were borrowed,

did not talk of _le sentiment_ in that sense till long

after Louis XIV.'s reign. No such thing is to be found

in Madame de Sévigné, la Bruyère, etc., etc., etc. At

home or abroad I defy Lord Dundee ever to have met with

the expression. Mr. Peter Pattieson had been reading the

_Man of Feeling_, and it was a slip of his tongue, which

I am less inclined to excuse than Mause's abstruse

Scotch, which I duly reverence, as she did

Kettledrummle's sermons, because I do not understand it.

Once more I shall be much disappointed if this work does

not quickly acquire a very great reputation. I fancy Mr.

Morritt is in the secret; yet, as I am not certain, I

will keep on the secure side and not mention it when I

write to him, however one may long to _intercommune_ on

such subjects with those likely to hold the same faith."

At the close of his reply, Scott says: "I must not

forget to thank your Ladyship for your acute and

indisputable criticism on the application of the word

_sentimental_. How it escaped my pen I know not, unless

that the word owed me a grudge for the ill will I have

uniformly borne it, and was resolved to slip itself in

for the express purpose of disgracing me. I will

certainly turn it out the first opportunity." This was

done in the second edition.--_Familiar Letters_, vol. i.

pp. 394, 400.]]

{p.132} I have disclaimed the power of farther illustrating its

historical groundworks, but I am enabled by Mr. Train's kindness to

give some interesting additions to Scott's own account of this novel

as a composition. The generous Supervisor visited him in Edinburgh in

May, 1816, a few days after the publication of The Antiquary, carrying

with him several relics which he wished to present to his collection;

among others a purse that had belonged {p.133} to Rob Roy, and also a

fresh heap of traditionary gleanings, which he had gathered among the

tale-tellers of his district. One of these last was in the shape of a

letter to Mr. Train from a Mr. Broadfoot, "schoolmaster at the clachan

of Penningham, and author of the _celebrated song_ of the Hills of

Galloway"--with which I confess myself unacquainted. Broadfoot had

facetiously signed his communication _Clashbottom_,--"a professional

appellation derived," says Mr. Train, "from the use of the birch, and

by which he was usually addressed among his companions,--who

assembled, not at the Wallace Inn of Gandercleuch, but at the sign of

the Shoulder of Mutton in Newton-Stewart." Scott received these gifts

with benignity, and invited the friendly donor to breakfast next

morning. He found him at work in his library, and surveyed with

enthusiastic curiosity the furniture of the room, especially its only

picture, a portrait of Graham of Claverhouse. Train expressed the

surprise with which every one, who had known Dundee only in the pages

of the Presbyterian Annalists, must see for the first time that

beautiful and melancholy visage, worthy of the most pathetic dreams of

romance. Scott replied, "that no character had been so foully traduced

as the Viscount of Dundee; that, thanks to Wodrow, Cruickshanks, and

such chroniclers, he, who was every inch a soldier and a gentleman,

still passed among the Scottish vulgar for a ruffian desperado, who

rode a goblin horse, was proof against shot, and in league with the

Devil." "Might he not," said Mr. Train, "be made, in good hands, the

hero of a national romance as interesting as any about either Wallace

or Prince Charlie?" "He might," said Scott, "but your western zealots

would require to be faithfully portrayed in order to bring him out

with the right effect."[54] "And what," resumed {p.134} Train, "if

the story were to be delivered as if from the mouth of _Old

Mortality_? Would _he_ not do as well as _the Minstrel_ did in the

Lay?" "Old Mortality!" said Scott--"who was he?" Mr. Train then told

what he could remember of old Paterson, and seeing how much his story

interested the hearer, offered to inquire farther about that

enthusiast on his return to Galloway. "Do so by all means," said

Scott; "I assure you I shall look with anxiety for your

communication." He said nothing at this time of his own meeting with

Old Mortality in the churchyard of Dunnottar--and I think there can be

no doubt that that meeting was thus recalled to his recollection; or

that to this intercourse with Mr. Train we owe the whole machinery of

the Tales of my Landlord, as well as the adoption of Claverhouse's

period for the scene of one of its first fictions. I think it highly

probable that we owe a further obligation to the worthy Supervisor's

presentation of Rob Roy's _spleuchan_.

[Footnote 54: [Scott's old friend, John Richardson, who

was from the first in the secret of the Waverley Novels,

was a stanch Whig, as beseemed the descendant of an old

Covenanting family. Some of his ancestral traditions

suggested certain passages in _Old Mortality_, and he

has recorded that during a visit to Abbotsford Scott

gave him the proof sheets of the first volume to read,

and how he lost a night's sleep in doing it. Twelve

years later, in writing to Scott regarding _The Tales of

a Grandfather_, he says that in this work,--"You have

paid a debt which you owed to the manes of the

Covenanters for the flattering picture which you drew of

Claverhouse in _Old Mortality_."

Scott says in his reply (December, 1828): "As to

Covenanters and Malignants, they were both a set of

cruel and bloody bigots, and had, notwithstanding, those

virtues with which bigotry is sometimes allied. Their

characters were of a kind much more picturesque than

beautiful; neither had the least idea either of

toleration or humanity, so that it happens that, so far

as they can be distinguished from each other, one is

tempted to hate most the party which chances to be

uppermost for the time."--See _Journal_, note, vol. ii.

p. 404.]]

The original design for the First Series of Jedediah Cleishbotham was,

as Scott told me, to include four separate tales illustrative of four

districts of the country, in the like number of volumes; but, his

imagination once kindled upon any theme, he could not but pour himself

out freely--so that notion was soon abandoned.

{p.135} CHAPTER XXXVIII.

Harold the Dauntless Published. -- Scott Aspires to Be a

Baron of the Exchequer. -- Letter to the Duke of Buccleuch

Concerning Poachers, etc. -- First Attack of Cramp in the

Stomach. -- Letters to Morritt, Terry, and Mrs. Maclean

Clephane. -- Story of the Doom of Devorgoil. -- John

Kemble's Retirement from the Stage. -- William Laidlaw

Established at Kaeside. -- Novel of Rob Roy Projected. --

Letter to Southey on the Relief of the Poor, etc. -- Letter

to Lord Montagu on Hogg's Queen's Wake, and on the Death of

Frances, Lady Douglas.

1817.

Within less than a month, The Black Dwarf and Old Mortality were

followed by "Harold the Dauntless, by the author of The Bridal of

Triermain." This poem had been, it appears, begun several years back;

nay, part of it had been actually printed before the appearance of

Childe Harold, though that circumstance had escaped the author's

remembrance when he penned, in 1830, his Introduction to The Lord of

the Isles; for he there says, "I am still astonished at my having

committed the gross error of selecting the very name which Lord Byron

had made so famous." The volume was published by Messrs. Constable,

and had, in those booksellers' phrase, "considerable success." It has

never, however, been placed on a level with Triermain; and though it

contains many vigorous pictures, and splendid verses, and here and

there some happy humor, the confusion and harsh transitions {p.136}

of the fable, and the dim rudeness of character and manners, seem

sufficient to account for this inferiority in public favor. It is not

surprising that the author should have redoubled his aversion to the

notion of any more serious performances in verse. He had seized on an

instrument of wider compass, and which, handled with whatever

rapidity, seemed to reveal at every touch treasures that had hitherto

slept unconsciously within him. He had thrown off his fetters, and

might well go forth rejoicing in the native elasticity of his

strength.

It is at least a curious coincidence in literary history, that, as

Cervantes, driven from the stage of Madrid by the success of Lope de

Vega, threw himself into prose romance, and produced, at the moment

when the world considered him as silenced forever, the Don Quixote

which has outlived Lope's two thousand triumphant dramas--so Scott,

abandoning verse to Byron, should have rebounded from his fall by the

only prose romances, which seem to be classed with the masterpiece of

Spanish genius, by the general judgment of Europe.

I shall insert two letters, in which he announces the publication of

Harold the Dauntless. In the first of them he also mentions the light

and humorous little piece entitled The Sultan of Serendib, or the

Search after Happiness, originally published in a weekly paper, after

the fashion of the old Essayists, which about this time issued from

John Ballantyne's premises, under the appropriate name of "The

SALE-ROOM." The paper had slender success; and though Scott wrote

several things for it, none of them, except this metrical essay,

attracted any notice. The Sale-Room was, in fact, a dull and hopeless

concern; and I should scarcely have thought it worth mentioning, but

for the confirmation it lends to my suspicion that Mr. John Ballantyne

was very unwilling, after all his warnings, to retire completely from

the field of publishing.

{p.137} TO J. B. S. MORRITT, ESQ., M. P., ROKEBY PARK.

EDINBURGH, January 30, 1817.

MY DEAR MORRITT,--I hope to send you in a couple of days

Harold the Dauntless, which has not turned out so good as I

thought it would have done. I begin to get too old and

stupid, I think, for poetry, and will certainly never again

adventure on a grand scale. For amusement, and to help a

little publication that is going on here, I have spun a

doggerel tale called The Search after Happiness, of which I

shall send you a copy by post, if it is of a frankable size;

if not, I can put it up with the Dauntless. Among other

misfortunes of Harold is his name, but the thing was partly

printed before Childe Harold was in question.

My great and good news at present is, that the bog (that

perpetual hobby-horse) has produced a commodity of most

excellent marle, and promises to be of the very last

consequence to my wild ground in the neighborhood; for

nothing can equal the effect of marle as a top-dressing.

Methinks (in my mind's eye, Horatio) I see all the

blue-bank, the hinny-lee, and the other provinces of my poor

kingdom, waving with deep rye-grass and clover, like the

meadows at Rokeby. In honest truth, it will do me yeoman's

service.

My next good tidings are, that Jedediah carries the world

before him. Six thousand have been disposed of, and three

thousand more are pressing onward, which will be worth £2500

to the worthy pedagogue of Gandercleuch. Some of the Scotch

Whigs, of the right old fanatical leaven, have waxed wroth

with Jedediah,--

"But shall we go mourn for that, my dear?

The cold moon shines by night,

And when we wander here and there,

We then do go most right."[55]

[Footnote 55: Joanna Baillie's _Orra_.]

After all, these honest gentlemen are like Queen Elizabeth

{p.138} in their ideas of portrait-painting. They require

the pictures of their predecessors to be likenesses, and at

the same time demand that they shall be painted without

shade, being probably of opinion, with the virgin majesty of

England, that there is no such thing in nature.

I presume you will be going almost immediately to London--at

least all our Scotch members are requested to be at their

posts, the meaning of which I cannot pretend to guess. The

finances are the only ticklish matter, but there is, after

all, plenty of money in the country, now that our fever-fit

is a little over. In Britain, when there is the least damp

upon the spirits of the public, they are exactly like people

in a crowd, who take the alarm, and shoulder each other to

and fro till some dozen or two of the weakest are borne down

and trodden to death; whereas, if they would but have

patience and remain quiet, there would be a safe and speedy

end to their embarrassment. How we want Billie Pitt now to

get up and give the tone to our feelings and opinions!

As I take up this letter to finish the same, I hear the

Prince Regent has been attacked and fired at. Since he was

not hurt (for I should be sincerely sorry for my fat

friend), I see nothing but good luck to result from this

assault. It will make him a good manageable boy, and, I

think, secure you a quiet session of Parliament.--Adieu, my

dear Morritt, God bless you. Let me know if the gimcracks

come safe--I mean the book, etc.

Ever yours,

Walter SCOTT.

TO THE LADY LOUISA STUART, GLOUCESTER PLACE, LONDON.

EDINBURGH, January 31, 1817.

MY DEAR LADY LOUISA,--This accompanies Harold the Dauntless.

I thought once I should have made it something clever, but

it turned vapid upon my imagination; and I finished it at

last with hurry and impatience. Nobody knows, that has not

tried the feverish trade of poetry, how much it depends upon

mood and whim. I {p.139} don't wonder, that, in dismissing

all the other deities of Paganism, the Muse should have been

retained by common consent; for, in sober reality, writing

good verses seems to depend upon something separate from the

volition of the author. I sometimes think my fingers set up

for themselves, independent of my head; for twenty times I

have begun a thing on a certain plan, and never in my life

adhered to it (in a work of imagination, that is) for half

an hour together. I would hardly write this sort of

egotistical trash to any one but yourself, yet it is very

true for all that. What my kind correspondent had

anticipated on account of Jedediah's effusions has actually

taken place; and the author of a very good Life of Knox has,

I understand, made a most energetic attack, upon the score

that the old Covenanters are not treated with decorum. I

have not read it, and certainly never shall. I really think

there is nothing in the book that is not very fair and

legitimate subject of raillery; and I own I have my

suspicions of that very susceptible devotion which so

readily takes offence: such men should not read books of

amusement; but do they suppose, because they are virtuous,

and choose to be thought outrageously so, "there shall be no

cakes and ale"?--"Ay, by our lady, and ginger shall be hot

in the mouth too."[56] As for the consequences to the

author, they can only affect his fortune or his temper--the

former, such as it is, has been long fixed beyond shot of

these sort of fowlers; and for my temper, I considered

always, that by subjecting myself to the irritability which

much greater authors have felt on occasions of literary

dispute, I should be laying in a plentiful stock of

unhappiness for the rest of my life. I therefore make it a

rule never to read the attacks made upon me. I remember

being capable of something like this sort of self-denial at

a very early period of life, for I could not be six years

old. I had been put into my bed in the nursery, and two

servant {p.140} girls sat down by the embers of the fire,

to have their own quiet chat, and the one began to tell a

most dismal ghost story, of which I remember the

commencement distinctly at this moment; but perceiving which

way the tale was tending, and though necessarily curious,

being at the same time conscious that, if I listened on, I

should be frightened out of my wits for the rest of the

night, I had the force to cover up my head in the

bed-clothes, so that I could not hear another word that was

said. The only inconvenience attending a similar prudential

line of conduct in the present case is, that it may seem

like a deficiency of spirit; but I am not much afraid of

that being laid to my charge--my fault in early life (I hope

long since corrected) having lain rather the other way. And

so I say, with mine honest Prior,--

"Sleep, Philo, untouch'd, on my peaceable shelf,

Nor take it amiss that so little I heed thee;

I've no malice at thee, and some love for myself--

Then why should I answer, since first I must read thee?"

[Footnote 56: _Twelfth Night_, Act II. Scene 3.]

So you are getting finely on in London. I own I am very glad

of it. I am glad the banditti act like banditti, because it

will make men of property look round them in time. This

country is very like the toys which folks buy for children,

and which, tumble them about in any way the urchins will,

are always brought to their feet again, by the lead

deposited in their extremities. The mass of property has the

same effect on our Constitution, and is a sort of ballast

which will always _right_ the vessel, to use a sailor's

phrase, and bring it to its due equipoise.

Ministers have acted most sillily in breaking up the burgher

volunteers in large towns. On the contrary, the service

should have been made coercive. Such men have a moral effect

upon the minds of the populace, besides their actual force,

and are so much interested in keeping good order, that you

may always rely on them, especially as a corps in which

there is necessarily a common {p.141} spirit of union and

confidence. But all this is nonsense again, quoth my Uncle

Toby to himself. Adieu, my dear Lady Louisa; my sincere good

wishes always attend you.

W. S.

Not to disturb the narrative of his literary proceedings, I have

deferred until now the mention of an attempt which Scott made during

the winter of 1816-1817, to exchange his seat at the Clerk's table for

one on the Bench of the Scotch Court of Exchequer. It had often

occurred to me, in the most prosperous years of his life, that such a

situation would have suited him better in every respect than that

which he held, and that his never attaining a promotion, which the

Scottish public would have considered so naturally due to his

character and services, reflected little honor on his political

allies. But at the period when I was entitled to hint this to him, he

appeared to have made up his mind that the rank of Clerk of Session

was more compatible than that of a Supreme Judge with the habits of a

literary man, who was perpetually publishing, and whose writings were

generally of the imaginative order. I had also witnessed the zeal with

which he seconded the views of more than one of his own friends, when

their ambition was directed to the Exchequer Bench. I remained, in

short, ignorant that he ever had seriously thought of it for himself,

until the ruin of his worldly fortunes in 1826; nor had I any

information that his wish to obtain it had ever been distinctly

stated, until certain letters, one of which I shall introduce, were

placed in my hands after his death, by the present Duke of Buccleuch.

The late Duke's answers to these letters are also before me; but of

them it is sufficient to say, that while they show the warmest anxiety

to serve Scott, they refer to private matters, which rendered it

inconsistent with his Grace's feelings to interfere at the time in

question with the distribution of Crown patronage. I incline to think,

on the whole, {p.142} that the death of this nobleman, which soon

after left the influence of his house in abeyance, must have, far more

than any other circumstance, determined Scott to renounce all notions

of altering his professional position.

TO THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH, ETC., ETC.

EDINBURGH, 11th December, 1816.

MY DEAR LORD DUKE,--Your Grace has been so much my constant

and kind friend and patron through the course of my life,

that I trust I need no apology for thrusting upon your

consideration some ulterior views, which have been suggested

to me by my friends, and which I will either endeavor to

prosecute, time and place serving, or lay aside all thoughts

of, as they appear to your Grace feasible, and likely to be

forwarded by your patronage. It has been suggested to me, in

a word, that there would be no impropriety in my being put

in nomination as a candidate for the situation of a Baron of

Exchequer, when a vacancy shall take place. The difference

of the emolument between that situation and those which I

now hold, is just £400 a year, so that, in that point of

view, it is not a very great object. But there is a

difference in the rank, and also in the leisure afforded by

a Baron's situation; and a man may, without condemnation,

endeavor, at my period of life, to obtain as much honor and

ease as he can handsomely come by. My pretensions to such an

honor (next to your Grace's countenancing my wishes) would

rest very much on the circumstance that my nomination would

vacate two good offices (Clerk of Session and Sheriff of

Selkirkshire) to the amount of £1000 and £300 a year; and,

besides, would extinguish a pension of £300 which I have for

life, over and above my salary as Clerk of Session, as

having been in office at the time when the Judicature Act

deprived us of a part of our vested fees and emoluments. The

extinction of this pension would be just so much saved to

the public. I am pretty confident also that I should

{p.143} be personally acceptable to our friend the Chief

Baron.[57] But whether all or any of these circumstances

will weigh much in my favor, must solely and entirely rest

with your Grace, without whose countenance it would be folly

in me to give the matter a second thought. _With_ your

patronage, both my situation and habits of society may place

my hopes as far as any who are likely to apply; and your

interest would be strengthened by the opportunity of placing

some good friend in Selkirkshire, besides converting the

Minstrel of the Clan into a Baron,--a transmutation worthy

of so powerful and kind a chief. But if your Grace thinks I

ought to drop thoughts of this preferment, I am bound to

say, that I think myself as well provided for by my friends

and the public as I have the least title to expect, and that

I am perfectly contented and grateful for what I have

received. Ever your Grace's faithful and truly obliged

servant,

Walter SCOTT.

[Footnote 57: The late Right Honorable Robert Dundas of

Arniston, Chief Baron of the Scotch Exchequer; one of

Scott's earliest and kindest friends in that

distinguished family.]

The following letter, to the same noble friend, contains a slight

allusion to this affair of the Barony; but I insert it for a better

reason. The Duke had, it seems, been much annoyed by some depredations

on his game in the district of Ettrick Water; and more so by the ill

use which some boys from Selkirk made of his liberality in allowing

the people of that town free access to his beautiful walks on the

banks of the Yarrow, adjoining Newark and Bowhill. The Duke's

forester, by name Thomas Hudson, had recommended rigorous measures

with reference to both these classes of offenders, and the Sheriff was

of course called into council:--

TO HIS GRACE THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH, ETC., ETC., ETC.

ABBOTSFORD, January 11, 1817.

MY DEAR LORD DUKE,--I have been thinking anxiously about the

disagreeable affair of Tom Hudson, {p.144} and the impudent

ingratitude of the Selkirk rising generation, and I will

take the usual liberty your friendship permits me, of saying

what occurs to me on each subject. Respecting the shooting,

the crime is highly punishable, and we will omit no

inquiries to discover the individuals guilty. Charles

Erskine, who is a good police-officer, will be sufficiently

active. I know my friend and kinsman, Mr. Scott of Harden,

feels very anxious to oblige your Grace, and I have little

doubt that if you will have the goodness to mention to him

this unpleasant circumstance, he would be anxious to put his

game under such regulations as should be agreeable to you.

But I believe the pride and pleasure he would feel in

obliging your Grace, as heading one of the most ancient and

most respectable branches of your name (if I may be pardoned

for saying so much in our favor), would be certainly much

more gratified by a compliance with your personal request,

than if it came through any other channel. Your Grace knows

there are many instances in life in which the most effectual

way of conferring a favor is condescending to accept one. I

have known Harden long and most intimately--a more

respectable man, either for feeling, or talent, or knowledge

of human life, is rarely to be met with. But he is rather

indecisive--requiring some instant stimulus in order to make

him resolve to do, not only what he knows to be right, but

what he really wishes to do, and means to do one time or

other. He is exactly Prior's Earl of Oxford:--

"Let that be done which Mat doth say."

"Yea," quoth the Earl, "_but not to-day_."

And so exit Harden, and enter Selkirk.

I know hardly anything more exasperating than the conduct of

the little blackguards, and it will be easy to discover and

make an example of the biggest and most insolent. In the

mean while, my dear Lord, pardon my requesting you will take

no general or sweeping resolution as to the Selkirk folks.

Your Grace lives near {p.145} them--your residence, both

from your direct beneficence, and the indirect advantages

which they derive from that residence, is of the utmost

consequence; and they must be made sensible that all these

advantages are endangered by the very violent and brutal

conduct of their children. But I think your Grace will be

inclined to follow this up only for the purpose of

correction, not for that of requital. They are so much

beneath you, and so much in your power, that this would be

unworthy of you--especially as all the inhabitants of the

little country town must necessarily be included in the

punishment. Were your Grace really angry with them, and

acting accordingly, you might ultimately feel the regret of

my old schoolmaster, who, when he had knocked me down,

apologized by saying he did not know his own strength. After

all, those who look for anything better than ingratitude

from the uneducated and unreflecting mass of a corrupted

population, must always be deceived; and the better the

heart is that has been expanded towards them, their wants

and their wishes, the deeper is the natural feeling of

disappointment. But it is our duty to fight on, doing what

good we can (and surely the disposition and the means were

never more happily united than in your Grace), and trusting

to God Almighty, whose grace ripens the seeds we commit to

the earth, that our benefactions shall bear fruit. And now,

my Lord, asking your pardon for this discharge of my

conscience, and assuring your Grace I have no wish to

exchange my worsted gown, or the remote _Pisgah_ exchange of

a silk one, for the cloak of a Presbyterian parson, even

with the certainty of succeeding to the first of your

numerous Kirk-presentations, I take the liberty to add my

own opinion. The elder boys must be looked out and punished,

and the parents severely reprimanded, and the whole

respectable part of the town made sensible of the loss they

must necessarily sustain by the discontinuance of your

patronage. And at, or about the same time, I {p.146} should

think it proper if your Grace were to distinguish by any

little notice such Selkirk people working with you as have

their families under good order.

I am taking leave of Abbotsford _multum gemens_, and have

been just giving directions for planting upon _Turn-again_.

When shall we eat a cold luncheon there, and look at the

view, and root up the monster in his abyss? I assure you

none of your numerous vassals can show a finer succession of

_distant_ prospects. For the home-view--ahem!--We must wait

till the trees grow.

Ever your Grace's truly faithful

W. SCOTT.

While the abortive negotiation as to the exchequer was still pending,

Scott was visited, for the first time since his childish years, with a

painful illness, which proved the harbinger of a series of attacks,

all nearly of the same kind, continued at short intervals during more

than two years. Various letters, already introduced, have indicated

how widely his habits of life when in Edinburgh differed from those of

Abbotsford. They at all times did so to a great extent; but he had

pushed his liberties with a most robust constitution to a perilous

extreme while the affairs of the Ballantynes were laboring, and he was

now to pay the penalty.

This first serious alarm occurred towards the close of a merry

dinner-party in Castle Street (on the 5th of March), when Scott

suddenly sustained such exquisite torture from cramp in the stomach,

that his masculine powers of endurance gave way, and he retired from

the room with a scream of agony which electrified his guests. This

scene was often repeated, as we shall see presently. His friends in

Edinburgh continued all that spring in great anxiety on his account.

Scarcely, however, had the first symptoms yielded to severe medical

treatment, than he is found to have beguiled the intervals of his

suffering by planning a dramatic piece on a story supplied to him by

one of Train's communications, which he desired to {p.147} present to

Terry, on behalf of the actor's first-born son who had been christened

by the name of Walter Scott.[58] Such was the origin of the Fortunes

of Devorgoil--a piece which, though completed soon afterwards, and

submitted by Terry to many manipulations with a view to the stage, was

never received by any manager, and was first published, towards the

close of the author's life, under the title, slightly altered for an

obvious reason, of The Doom of Devorgoil. The sketch of the story

which he gives in the following letter will probably be considered by

many besides myself as well worth the drama. It appears that the actor

had mentioned to Scott his intention of _Terryfying_ The Black Dwarf.

[Footnote 58: This young gentleman is now an officer in

the East India Company's army.--(1837.) Mr. W. S. Terry

lived to distinguish himself as a soldier, and fell in

action against the Afghans.--(1848.)]

TO DANIEL TERRY, ESQ., LONDON.

EDINBURGH, 12th March, 1817.

DEAR TERRY,--I am now able to write to you on your own

affairs, though still as weak as water from the operations

of the medical faculty, who, I think, treated me as a

recusant to their authority, and having me once at

advantage, were determined I should not have strength to

rebel again in a hurry. After all, I believe it was touch

and go; and considering how much I have to do for my own

family and others, my elegy might have been that of the Auld

Man's Mare,--

"The peats and turf are all to lead,

What ail'd the beast to die?"

You don't mention the nature of your undertaking in your

last, and in your former you spoke both of the Black Dwarf

and of Triermain. I have some doubts whether the town will

endure a second time the following up a well-known tale with

a dramatic representation--and there is no _vis comica_ to

redeem the Black Dwarf, as in the case of Dominie Sampson. I

have thought of {p.148} two subjects for you, if, like the

Archbishop's homilies, they do not smell of the apoplexy.

The first is a noble and very dramatic tradition preserved

in Galloway, which runs briefly thus: The Barons of Plenton

(the family name, I think, was ---- by Jupiter, forgot!)

boasted of great antiquity, and formerly of extensive power

and wealth, to which the ruins of their huge castle,

situated on an inland loch, still bear witness. In the

middle of the seventeenth century, it is said, these ruins

were still inhabited by the lineal descendant of this

powerful family. But the ruinous halls and towers of his

ancestors were all that had descended to him, and he

cultivated the garden of the castle, and sold its fruits for

a subsistence. He married in a line suitable rather to his

present situation than the dignity of his descent, and was

quite sunk into the rank of peasantry, excepting that he was

still called--more in mockery, or at least in familiarity,

than in respect--the Baron of Plenton. A causeway connected

the castle with the mainland; it was cut in the middle, and

the moat only passable by a drawbridge which yet subsisted,

and which the poor old couple contrived to raise every night

by their joint efforts, the country being very unsettled at

the time. It must be observed that the old man and his wife

occupied only one apartment in the extensive ruins, a small

one adjoining to the drawbridge; the rest was waste and

dilapidated.

As they were about to retire one night to rest, they were

deterred by a sudden storm which, rising in the wildest

manner possible, threatened to bury them under the ruins of

the castle. While they listened in terror to the complicated

sounds of thunder, wind, and rain, they were astonished to

hear the clang of hoofs on the causeway, and the voices of

people clamoring for admittance. This was a request not

rashly to be granted. The couple looked out, and dimly

discerned through the storm that the causeway was crowded

with riders. "How many of {p.149} you are there?" demanded

John.--"Not more than the hall will hold," was the answer;

"but open the gate, lower the bridge, and do not keep the

_ladies_ in the rain."--John's heart was melted for the

_ladies_, and, against his wife's advice, he undid the

bolts, sunk the drawbridge, and bade them enter in the name

of God. Having done so, he instantly retired into his

_sanctum sanctorum_ to await the event, for there was

something in the voices and language of his guests that

sounded mysterious and awful. They rushed into the castle,

and appeared to know their way through all its recesses.

Grooms were heard hurrying their horses to the

stables--sentinels were heard mounting guard--a thousand

lights gleamed from place to place through the ruins, till

at length they seemed all concentrated in the baronial hall,

whose range of broad windows threw a resplendent

illumination on the moss-grown court below.

After a short time, a domestic, clad in a rich but very

antique dress, appeared before the old couple, and commanded

them to attend his lord and lady in the great hall. They

went with tottering steps, and to their great terror found

themselves in the midst of a most brilliant and joyous

company; but the fearful part of it was, that most of the

guests resembled the ancestors of John's family, and were

known to him by their resemblance to pictures which

mouldered in the castle, or by traditionary description. At

the head, the founder of the race, dressed like some mighty

baron, or rather some Galwegian prince, sat with his lady.

There was a difference of opinion between these ghostly

personages concerning our honest John. The chief was

inclined to receive him graciously; the lady considered him,

from his mean marriage, as utterly unworthy of their name

and board. The upshot is, that the chief discovers to his

descendant the means of finding a huge treasure concealed in

the castle; the lady assures him that the discovery shall

never avail him.--In the morning no trace can be discovered

of {p.150} the singular personages who had occupied the

hall. But John sought for and discovered the vault where the

spoils of the Southrons were concealed, rolled away the

covering stone, and feasted his eyes on a range of massy

chests of iron, filled doubtless with treasure. As he

deliberated on the best means of bringing them up, and

descending into the vault, he observed it began slowly to

fill with water. Bailing and pumping were resorted to, and

when he had exhausted his own and his wife's strength, they

summoned the assistance of the neighborhood. But the

vengeance of the visionary lady was perfect; the waters of

the lake had forced their way into the vault, and John,

after a year or two spent in draining and so forth, died

broken-hearted, the last Baron of Plenton.

Such is the tale, of which the incidents seem new, and the

interest capable of being rendered striking; the story

admits of the highest degree of decoration, both by poetry,

music, and scenery, and I propose (in behalf of my godson)

to take some pains in dramatizing it. As thus;--you shall

play John, as you can speak a little Scotch; I will make him

what the Baron of Bradwardine would have been in his

circumstances, and he shall be alternately ridiculous from

his family pride and prejudices, contrasted with his

poverty, and respectable from his just and independent tone

of feeling and character. I think Scotland is entitled to

have something on the stage to balance Macklin's two

worthies.[59] You understand the dialect will be only tinged

with the national dialect--not that the baron is to speak

broad Scotch, while all the others talk English. His wife

and he shall have one child, a daughter, suitored unto by

the conceited young parson or schoolmaster of the village,

whose addresses are countenanced by her mother,--and by

Halbert the hunter, a youth of unknown descent. Now this

youth shall be the rightful heir and representative of the

English owners of the treasure, of which they had been

{p.151} robbed by the baron's ancestors, for which unjust

act, their spirits still walked the earth. These, with a

substantial character or two, and the ghostly personages,

shall mingle as they may--and the discovery of the youth's

birth shall break the spell of the treasure-chamber. I will

make the ghosts talk as never ghosts talked in the body or

out of it; and the music may be as unearthly as you can get

it. The rush of the shadows into the castle shall be seen

through the window of the baron's apartment in the flat

scene. The ghosts' banquet, and many other circumstances,

may give great exercise to the scene-painter and dresser. If

you like this plan, you had better suspend any other for the

present. In my opinion it has the infinite merit of being

perfectly new in plot and structure, and I will set about

the sketch as soon as my strength is restored in some

measure by air and exercise. I am sure I can finish it in a

fortnight then. Ever yours truly,

W. SCOTT.

[Footnote 59: Sir Archy Mac-Sarcasm and Sir Pertinax

Mac-Sycophant.]

About the time when this letter was written, a newspaper paragraph

having excited the apprehension of two--or I should say three--of his

dearest friends, that his life was in actual danger, Scott wrote to

them as follows:--

TO J. B. S. MORRITT, ESQ., M. P., PORTLAND PLACE, LONDON.

EDINBURGH, 20th March, 1817.

MY DEAR MORRITT,--I hasten to acquaint you that I am in the

land of life, and thriving, though I have had a slight

shake, and still feel the consequences of medical treatment.

I had been plagued all through this winter with cramps in my

stomach, which I endured as a man of mould might, and

endeavored to combat them by drinking scalding water, and so

forth. As they grew rather unpleasantly frequent, I had

reluctant recourse to Baillie. But before his answer arrived

on the 5th, I had a most violent attack, which broke up a

small party at {p.152} my house, and sent me to bed roaring

like a bull-calf. All sorts of remedies were applied, as in

the case of Gil Blas's pretended colic, but such was the

pain of the real disorder, that it outdevilled the Doctor

hollow. Even heated salt, which was applied in such a state

that it burned my shirt to rags, I hardly felt when clapped

to my stomach. At length the symptoms became inflammatory,

and dangerously so, the seat being the diaphragm. They only

gave way to very profuse bleeding and blistering, which

under higher assistance saved my life. My recovery was slow

and tedious from the state of exhaustion. I could neither

stir for weakness and giddiness, nor read for dazzling in my

eyes, nor listen for a whizzing sound in my ears, nor even

think for lack of the power of arranging my ideas. So I had

a comfortless time of it for about a week. Even yet I by no

means feel, as the copy-book hath it,

"The lion bold, which the lamb doth hold--"

on the contrary, I am as weak as water. They tell me (of

course) I must renounce every creature comfort, as my friend

Jedediah calls it. As for dinner and so forth, I care little

about it--but toast and water, and three glasses of wine,

sound like hard laws to me. However, to parody the

lamentation of Hassan, the camel-driver,

"The lily health outvies the grape's bright ray,

And life is dearer than the usquebæ--"

so I shall be amenable to discipline. But in my own secret

mind I suspect the state of my bowels more than anything

else. I take enough of exercise and enough of rest; but

unluckily they are like a Lapland year, divided as one night

and one day. In the vacation I never sit down; in the

session-time I seldom rise up. But all this must be better

arranged in future; and I trust I shall live to weary out

all your kindness.

I am obliged to break off hastily. I trust I shall be able

to get over the Fell in the end of summer, which {p.153}

will rejoice me much, for the sound of the woods of Rokeby

is lovely in mine ear. Ever yours,

Walter SCOTT.

TO MRS. MACLEAN CLEPHANE, OF TORLOISK, MULL.

EDINBURGH, 23d March, 1817.

MY DEAR Mrs. AND MISS CLEPHANE,--Here comes to let you know

you had nearly seen the last sight of me, unless I had come

to visit you on my red beam like one of Fingal's heroes,

which, Ossianic as you are, I trow you would readily

dispense with. The cause was a cramp in my stomach, which,

after various painful visits, as if it had been sent by

Prospero, and had mistaken me for Caliban, at length chose

to conclude by setting fire to its lodging, like the

Frenchmen as they retreated through Russia, and placed me in

as proper a state of inflammation as if I had had the whole

Spafields committee in my unfortunate stomach. Then bleeding

and blistering was the word; and they bled and blistered

till they left me neither skin nor blood. However, they beat

off the foul fiend, and I am bound to praise the bridge

which carried me over. I am still very totterish, and very

giddy, kept to panada, or rather to porridge, for I spurned

at all foreign slops, and adhered to our ancient oatmeal

manufacture.[60] But I have no apprehension of any return of

the serious part of the malady, and I am now recovering my

strength, though looking somewhat cadaverous upon the

occasion.

[Footnote 60: [On the 17th of March, Scott had written

to Joanna Baillie: "Two _remarkables_ struck me in my

illness: the first was, that my great wolf-dog clamored

wildly and fearfully about my bed when I was very ill,

and would hardly be got out of the room; the other, that

when I was recovering, all acquired and factitious

tastes seemed to leave me, and I could eat nothing but

porridge, and listen to no better reading than a stupid

Scottish diary which would have made a whole man

sick."--_Familiar Letters_, vol. i. p. 421.]]

I much approve of your going to Italy by sea; indeed it is

the only way you ought to think of it. I am only {p.154}

sorry you are going to leave us for a while; but indeed the

isle of Mull might be Florence to me in respect of

separation, and cannot be quite Florence to you, since Lady

Compton is not there. I lately heard her mentioned in a

company where my interest in her was not known, as one of

the very few English ladies now in Italy whom their

acquirements, conduct, and mode of managing time, induce

that part of foreign society, whose approbation is valuable,

to consider with high respect and esteem. This I think is

very likely; for, whatever folks say of foreigners, those of

good education and high rank among them, must have a supreme

contempt for the frivolous, dissatisfied, empty, gad-about

manners of many of our modern belles. And we may say among

ourselves, that there are few upon whom high accomplishments

and information sit more gracefully.

John Kemble is here to take leave, acting over all his great

characters, and with all the spirit of his best years. He

played Coriolanus last night (the first time I have ventured

out) fully as well as I ever saw him; and you know what a

complete model he is of the Roman. He has made a great

reformation in his habits; given up wine, which he used to

swallow by pailfuls,--and renewed his youth like the eagles.

He seems to me always to play best those characters in which

there is a predominating tinge of some overmastering

passion, or acquired habit of acting and speaking, coloring

the whole man. The patrician pride of Coriolanus, the

stoicism of Brutus and Cato, the rapid and hurried vehemence

of Hotspur, mark the class of characters I mean. But he

fails where a ready and pliable yielding to the events and

passions of life makes what may be termed a more natural

personage. Accordingly I think his Macbeth, Lear, and

especially his Richard, inferior in spirit and truth. In

Hamlet, the natural fixed melancholy of the prince places

him within Kemble's range;--yet many delicate and sudden

turns of passion slip through his fingers. He is {p.155} a

lordly vessel, goodly and magnificent when going large

before the wind, but wanting the facility to go "_ready

about_," so that he is sometimes among the breakers before

he can wear ship. Yet we lose in him a most excellent

critic, an accomplished scholar, and one who graced our

forlorn drama with what little it has left of good sense and

gentlemanlike feeling. And so exit he. He made me write some

lines to speak when he withdraws, and he has been here

criticising and correcting till he got them quite to his

mind, which has rather tired me.

Most truly yours while

Walter SCOTT.

On the 29th of March, 1817, John Philip Kemble, after going through

the round of his chief parts, to the delight of the Edinburgh

audience, took his final leave of them as Macbeth, and in the costume

of that character delivered a farewell address, penned for him by

Scott.[61] No one who witnessed that scene, and heard the lines as

then recited, can ever expect to be again interested to the same

extent by anything occurring within the walls {p.156} of a theatre;

nor was I ever present at any public dinner in all its circumstances

more impressive than was that which occurred a few days afterwards,

when Kemble's Scotch friends and admirers assembled around

him--Francis Jeffrey being chairman, Walter Scott and John Wilson the

croupiers.

[Footnote 61: See _Poetical Works_, vol. xi. p. 348

[Cambridge Ed. p. 436]. Scott's farewell for Kemble

first appeared in _The Sale-Room_ for April 5, 1817; and

in the introductory note James Ballantyne says: "The

character fixed upon, with happy propriety, for Kemble's

closing scene, was Macbeth. He had labored under a

severe cold for a few days before, but on the memorable

night the physical annoyance yielded to the energy of

his mind. 'He was,' he said in the Green-room,

immediately before the curtain rose, 'determined to

leave behind him the most perfect specimen of his art

which he had ever shown;' and his success was complete.

At the moment of the tyrant's death, the curtain fell by

the universal acclamation of the audience. The applauses

were vehement and prolonged; they ceased--were

resumed--rose again--were reiterated--and again were

hushed. In a few minutes the curtain ascended, and Mr.

Kemble came forward, in the dress of Macbeth (the

audience by a consentaneous movement rising to receive

him), to deliver his _farewell_." ... "Mr. Kemble

delivered the lines with exquisite beauty, and with an

effect that was evidenced by the tears and sobs of many

of the audience. His own emotions were very conspicuous.

When his farewell was closed, he lingered long on the

stage, as if unable to retire. The house again stood up,

and cheered him with the waving of hats and long shouts

of applause."]

Shortly before this time, Mr. William Laidlaw had met with

misfortunes, which rendered it necessary for him to give up the lease

of a farm, on which he had been for some years settled, in

Mid-Lothian. He was now anxiously looking about him for some new

establishment, and it occurred to Scott that it might be mutually

advantageous, as well as agreeable, if his excellent friend would

consent to come and occupy a house on his property, and endeavor,

under his guidance, to make such literary exertions as might raise his

income to an amount adequate for his comfort. The prospect of

obtaining such a neighbor was, no doubt, the more welcome to

"Abbotsford and Kaeside," from its opening at this period of

fluctuating health; and Laidlaw, who had for twenty years loved and

revered him, considered the proposal with far greater delight than the

most lucrative appointment on any noble domain in the island could

have afforded him. Though possessed of a lively and searching sagacity

as to things in general, he had always been as to his own worldly

interests simple as a child. His tastes and habits were all modest;

and when he looked forward to spending the remainder of what had not

hitherto been a successful life, under the shadow of the genius that

he had worshipped almost from boyhood, his gentle heart was all

happiness. He surveyed with glistening eyes the humble cottage in

which his friend proposed to lodge him, his wife, and his little ones,

and said to himself that he should write no more sad songs on _Forest

Flittings_.[62]

[Footnote 62: Mr. Laidlaw has not published many verses;

but his song of _Lucy's Flitting_--a simple and pathetic

picture of a poor Ettrick maiden's feelings in leaving a

service where she had been happy--has long been, and

must ever be, a favorite with all who understand the

delicacies of the Scottish dialect, and the manners of

the district in which the scene is laid.]

{p.157} Scott's notes to him at this time afford a truly charming

picture of thoughtful and respectful delicacy on both sides. Mr.

Laidlaw, for example, appears to have hinted that he feared his

friend, in making the proposal as to the house at Kaeside, might have

perhaps in some degree overlooked the feelings of "Laird Moss," who,

having sold his land several months before, had as yet continued to

occupy his old homestead. Scott answers:--

TO MR. W. LAIDLAW.

EDINBURGH, April 5, 1817.

MY DEAR SIR,--Nothing can give me more pleasure than the

prospect of your making yourself comfortable at Kaeside till

some good thing casts up. I have not put Mr. Moss to any

inconvenience, for I only requested an answer, giving him

leave to sit if he had a mind--and of free will he leaves my

premises void and redd at Whitsunday. I suspect the house is

not in good order, but we shall get it brushed up a little.

Without affectation I consider myself the obliged party in

this matter--or at any rate it is a mutual benefit, and you

shall have grass for a cow, and so forth--whatever you want.

I am sure when you are so near I shall find some literary

labor for you that will make ends meet. Yours, in haste,

W. SCOTT.

He had before this time made considerable progress in another

historical sketch (that of the year 1815) for the Edinburgh Annual

Register; and the first literary labor which he provided for Laidlaw

appears to have been arranging for the same volume a set of newspaper

articles, usually printed under the head of _Chronicle_, to which were

appended some little extracts of new books of travels, and the like

miscellanies. The Edinburgh {p.158} Monthly Magazine, subsequently

known by the name of its projector, Blackwood, commenced in April of

this year; and one of its editors, Mr. Thomas Pringle, being a

Teviotdale man and an old acquaintance of Laidlaw's, offered to the

latter the care of its _Chronicle department_ also,--not perhaps

without calculating that, in case Laidlaw's connection with the new

journal should become at all a strict one, Scott would be induced to

give it occasionally the benefit of his own literary assistance. He

accordingly did not write--being unwell at the time--but _dictated_ to

Pringle a collection of anecdotes concerning Scottish gypsies, which

attracted a good deal of notice;[63] and, I believe, he also assisted

Laidlaw in drawing up one or more articles on the subject of Scottish

superstitions. But the bookseller and Pringle soon quarrelled, and the

Magazine assuming, on the retirement of the latter, a high Tory

character, Laidlaw's Whig feelings induced him to renounce its

alliance; while Scott, having no kindness for Blackwood personally,

and disapproving (though he chuckled over it) the reckless

extravagance of juvenile satire which, by and by, distinguished his

journal, appears to have easily acquiesced in the propriety of

Laidlaw's determination. I insert meantime a few notes, which will

show with what care and kindness he watched over Laidlaw's operations

for the Annual Register.

[Footnote 63: These anecdotes were subsequently inserted

in the Introduction to _Guy Mannering_.]

TO MR. LAIDLAW, AT KAESIDE.

EDINBURGH, June 16, 1817.

DEAR SIR,--I enclose you "rare guerdon," better than

remuneration,--namely, a cheque for £25, for the Chronicle

part of the Register. The incidents selected should have

some reference to amusement as well as information, and may

be occasionally abridged in the narration; but, after all,

paste and scissors form your principal {p.159} materials.

You must look out for two or three good original articles;

and, if you would read and take pains to abridge one or two

curious books of travels, I would send out the volumes.

Could I once get the head of the concern fairly round before

the wind again, I am sure I could make it £100 a year to

you. In the present instance it will be at least £50.

Yours truly,

W. S.

TO THE SAME.

EDINBURGH, July 3, 1817.

MY DEAR SIR,--I send you Adam's and Riley's Travels. You

will observe I don't want a review of the books, or a detail

of these persons' adventures, but merely a short article

expressing the light, direct or doubtful, which they have

thrown on the interior of Africa. "Recent Discoveries in

Africa" will be a proper title. I hope to find you

materially amended, or rather quite stout, when I come out

on Saturday. I am quite well this morning. Yours, in haste,

W. S.

P. S.--I add Mariner's Tonga Islands, and Campbell's Voyage.

Pray take great care of them, as I am a coxcomb about my

books, and hate specks or spots. Take care of yourself, and

want for nothing that Abbotsford can furnish.

These notes have carried us down to the middle of the year. But I must

now turn to some others, which show that before Whitsuntide, when

Laidlaw settled at Kaeside, negotiations were on foot respecting

another novel.

TO MR. JOHN BALLANTYNE, HANOVER STREET, EDINBURGH.

ABBOTSFORD, Monday. [April, 1817.]

DEAR JOHN,--I have a good subject for a work of fiction _in

petto_. What do you think Constable would give for a smell

of it? You ran away without taking {p.160} leave the other

morning, or I wished to have spoken to you about it. I don't

mean a continuation of Jedediah, because there might be some

delicacy in putting that by the original publishers. You may

write if anything occurs to you on this subject. It will not

interrupt my History. By the way, I have a great lot of the

Register ready for delivery, and no man asks for it. I shall

want to pay up some cash at Whitsunday, which will make me

draw on my brains. Yours truly,

W. SCOTT.

TO THE SAME.

ABBOTSFORD, Saturday, May 3, 1817.

DEAR JOHN,--I shall be much obliged to you to come here with

Constable on Monday, as he proposes a visit, and it will

save time. By the way, you must attend that the usual

quantity of stock is included in the arrangement--that is

£600 for 6000 copies. My sum is £1700, payable in May--a

round advance, by'r Lady, but I think I am entitled to it,

considering what I have twined off hitherto on such

occasions.

I make a point on your coming with Constable, health

allowing. Yours truly,

W. S.

The result of this meeting is indicated in a note, scribbled by John

Ballantyne at the bottom of the foregoing letter, before it was seen

by his brother the printer:--

Half-past 3 o'clock, Tuesday.

DEAR JAMES,--I am at this moment returned from Abbotsford,

with entire and full success. Wish me joy. I shall gain

above £600--Constable taking my share of stock also. This

title is _Rob Roy--by the Author of Waverley!!!_ Keep this

letter for me.

J. B.

On the same page there is written, in fresher ink, which marks, no

doubt, the time when John pasted it into his collection of private

papers now before me,--

N. B.--I did gain above £1200.--J. B.

{p.161} The title of this novel was suggested by Constable, and he

told me years afterwards the difficulty he had to get it adopted by

the author. "What!" said he, "Mr. Accoucheur, must you be setting up

for Mr. Sponsor too?--but let's hear it." Constable said the name of

the real hero would be the best possible name for the book. "Nay,"

answered Scott, "never let me have to write up to a name. You well

know I have generally adopted a title that told nothing."--The

bookseller, however, persevered; and after the trio had dined, these

scruples gave way.

On rising from table, according to Constable, they sallied out to the

green before the door of the cottage, and all in the highest spirits

enjoyed the fine May evening. John Ballantyne, hopping up and down in

his glee, exclaimed, "Is Rob's gun here, Mr. Scott; would you object

to my trying the auld barrel with a _few de joy_?"--"Nay, Mr. Puff,"

said Scott, "it would burst, and blow you to the devil before your

time."--"Johnny, my man," said Constable, "what the mischief puts

drawing at sight into _your_ head?" Scott laughed heartily at this

innuendo; and then observing that the little man felt somewhat sore,

called attention to the notes of a bird in the adjoining shrubbery.

"And by the bye," said he, as they continued listening, "'tis a long

time, Johnny, since we have had the Cobbler of Kelso." Mr. Puff

forthwith jumped up on a mass of stone, and seating himself in the

proper attitude of one working with his awl, began a favorite

interlude, mimicking a certain son of Crispin, at whose stall Scott

and he had often lingered when they were schoolboys, and a blackbird,

the only companion of his cell, that used to sing to him, while he

talked and whistled to it all day long. With this performance Scott

was always delighted: nothing could be richer than the contrast of the

bird's wild sweet notes, some of which he imitated with wonderful

skill, and the accompaniment of the Cobbler's hoarse cracked {p.162}

voice, uttering all manner of endearing epithets, which Johnny

multiplied and varied in a style worthy of the Old Women in Rabelais

at the birth of Pantagruel. I often wondered that Mathews, who

borrowed so many good things from John Ballantyne, allowed this

Cobbler, which was certainly the masterpiece, to escape him.

Scott himself had probably exceeded that evening the three glasses of

wine sanctioned by his Sangrados. "I never," said Constable, "had

found him so disposed to be communicative about what he meant to do.

Though he had had a return of his illness but the day before, he

continued for an hour or more to walk backwards and forwards on the

green, talking and laughing--he told us he was sure he should make a

hit in a Glasgow weaver, whom he would _ravel up with Rob_; and fairly

outshone the Cobbler, in an extempore dialogue between the bailie and

the cateran--something not unlike what the book gives us as passing in

the Glasgow tolbooth."

Mr. Puff might well exult in the "full and entire success" of this

trip to Abbotsford. His friend had made it a _sine qua non_ with

Constable that he should have a third share in the bookseller's moiety

of the bargain--and though Johnny had no more trouble about the

publishing or selling of Rob Roy than his own Cobbler of Kelso, this

stipulation had secured him a _bonus_ of £1200, before two years

passed. Moreover, one must admire his adroitness in persuading

Constable, during their journey back to Edinburgh, to relieve him of

that fraction of his own old stock, with which his unhazardous share

in the new transaction was burdened. Scott's kindness continued, as

long as John Ballantyne lived, to provide for him a constant

succession of similar advantages at the same easy rate; and Constable,

from deference to Scott's wishes, and from his own liking for the

humorous auctioneer, appears to have submitted with hardly a momentary

grudge to this heavy tax on his most important ventures.

{p.163} The same week Scott received Southey's celebrated letter to

Mr. William Smith, M. P. for Norwich. The poet of Keswick had also

forwarded to him somewhat earlier his Pilgrimage to Waterloo, which

piece contains a touching allusion to the affliction the author had

recently sustained in the death of a fine boy. Scott's letter on this

occasion was as follows:--

TO ROBERT SOUTHEY, ESQ., KESWICK.

SELKIRK, May 9, 1817.

MY DEAR SOUTHEY,--I have been a strangely negligent

correspondent for some months past, more especially as I

have had you rarely out of my thoughts, for I think you will

hardly doubt of my sincere sympathy in events which have

happened since I have written. I shed sincere tears over the

Pilgrimage to Waterloo. But in the crucible of human life,

the purest gold is tried by the strongest heat, and I can

only hope for the continuance of your present family

blessings to one so well formed to enjoy the pure happiness

they afford. My health has, of late, been very indifferent.

I was very nearly succumbing under a violent inflammatory

attack, and still feel the effects of the necessary

treatment. I believe they took one third of the blood of my

system, and blistered in proportion: so that both my flesh

and my blood have been in a woefully reduced state. I got

out here some weeks since, where, by dint of the insensible

exercise which one takes in the country, I feel myself

gathering strength daily, but am still obliged to observe a

severe regimen. It was not to croak about myself, however,

that I took up the pen, but to wish you joy of your

triumphant answer to that coarse-minded William Smith. He

deserved all he has got, and, to say the truth, you do not

spare him, and have no cause. His attack seems to have

proceeded from the vulgar insolence of a low mind desirous

of attacking genius at disadvantage. It is the ancient and

eternal strife of which the witch speaks in {p.164}

Thalaba. Such a man as he, feels he has no alliance with

such as you, and his evil instincts lead him to treat as

hostile whatever he cannot comprehend. I met Smith once

during his stay in Edinburgh,[64] and had, what I seldom

have with any one in society, a high quarrel with him. His

mode of travelling had been from one gentleman's seat to

another, abusing the well-known hospitality of the Highland

lairds, by taking possession of their houses, even during

their absence, domineering in them when they were present,

and not only eating the dinner of to-day, but requiring that

the dinner of to-morrow should also be made ready and

carried forward with him, to save the expense of inns. All

this was no business of mine, but when, in the middle of a

company consisting of those to whom he had owed this

hospitality, he abused the country, of which he knew

little--the language, of which he knew nothing--and the

people, who have their faults, but are a much more harmless,

moral, and at the same time high-spirited population, than,

I venture to say, he ever lived amongst--I thought it was

really too bad, and so e'en took up the debate, and gave it

him over the knuckles as smartly as I could. Your pamphlet,

therefore, fed fat my ancient grudge against him as well as

the modern one, for you cannot doubt that my blood boiled at

reading the report of his speech. Enough of this gentleman,

who, I think, will not walk out of the round in a hurry

again, to slander the conduct of individuals.

[Footnote 64: Scott's meeting with this Mr. Smith

occurred at the table of his friend and colleague,

Hector Macdonald Buchanan. The company, except Scott and

Smith, were all, like their hospitable landlord,

Highlanders.]

I am at present writing at our head-court of freeholders--a

set of quiet, unpretending, but sound-judging country

gentlemen, and whose opinions may be very well taken as a

fair specimen of those men of sense and honor, who are not

likely to be dazzled by literary talent, which {p.165} lies

out of their beat, and who, therefore, cannot be of partial

counsel in the cause; and I never heard an opinion more

generally, and even warmly expressed, than that your

triumphant vindication brands Smith as a slanderer in all

time coming. I think you may not be displeased to know this,

because what men of keen feelings and literary pursuits must

have felt, cannot be unknown to you, and you may not have

the same access to know the impression made upon the general

class of society.

I have to thank you for the continuation of the History of

Brazil--one of your gigantic labors; the fruit of a mind so

active, yet so patient of labor. I am not yet far advanced

in the second volume, reserving it usually for my hour's

amusement in the evening, as children keep their dainties

for _bonne bouche_: but as far as I have come, it possesses

all the interest of the commencement, though a more

faithless and worthless set than both Dutch and Portuguese I

have never read of; and it requires your knowledge of the

springs of human action, and your lively description of

"hair-breadth 'scapes," to make one care whether the hog

bites the dog, or the dog bites the hog. Both nations were

in rapid declension from their short-lived age of heroism,

and in the act of experiencing all those retrograde

movements which are the natural consequence of selfishness

on the one hand, and bigotry on the other.

I am glad to see you are turning your mind to the state of

the poor. Should you enter into details on the subject of

the best mode of assisting them, I would be happy to tell

you the few observations I have made--not on a very small

scale neither, considering my fortune, for I have kept about

thirty of the laborers in my neighborhood in constant

employment this winter. This I do not call charity, because

they executed some extensive plantations and other works,

which I could never have got done so cheaply, and which I

always intended {p.166} one day to do. But neither was it

altogether selfish on my part, because I was putting myself

to inconvenience in incurring the expense of several years

at once, and certainly would not have done so, but to serve

mine honest neighbors, who were likely to want work but for

such exertion. From my observation, I am inclined greatly to

doubt the salutary effect of the scheme generally adopted in

Edinburgh and elsewhere for relieving the poor. At

Edinburgh, they are employed on public works at so much a

day--tenpence, I believe, or one shilling, with an advance

to those who have families. This rate is fixed below that of

ordinary wages, in order that no person may be employed but

those who really cannot find work elsewhere. But it is

attended with this bad effect, that the people regard it

partly as charity, which is humiliating--and partly as an

imposition, in taking their labor below its usual salable

value; to which many add a third view of the

subject--namely, that this sort of half-pay is not given

them for the purpose of working, but to prevent their rising

in rebellion. None of these misconceptions are favorable to

hard labor, and the consequence is, that I never have seen

such a set of idle _fainéants_ as those employed on this

system in the public works, and I am sure that,

notwithstanding the very laudable intention of those who

subscribed to form the fund, and the yet more praiseworthy,

because more difficult, exertions of those who superintend

it, the issue of the scheme will occasion full as much

mischief as good to the people engaged in it. Private

gentlemen, acting on something like a similar system, may

make it answer better, because they have not the lazy dross

of a metropolis to contend with--because they have fewer

hands to manage--and, above all, because an individual

always manages his own concerns better than those of the

country can be managed. Yet all who have employed those who

were distressed for want of work at under wages, have had,

less or more, similar complaints to make. I {p.167} think I

have avoided this in my own case, by inviting the country

people to do piece-work by the contract. Two things only are

necessary--one is, that the nature of the work should be

such as will admit of its being ascertained, when finished,

to have been substantially executed. All sort of spade-work

and hoe-work, with many other kinds of country labor, fall

under this description, and the employer can hardly be

cheated in the execution if he keeps a reasonable lookout.

The other point is, to take care that the undertakers, in

their anxiety for employment, do not take the job too cheap.

A little acquaintance with country labor will enable one to

regulate this; but it is an essential point, for if you do

not keep them to their bargain, it is making a jest of the

thing, and forfeiting the very advantage you have in

view--that, namely, of inducing the laborer to bring his

heart and spirit to his work. But this he will do where he

has a fair bargain, which is to prove a good or bad one

according to his own exertions. In this case you make the

poor man his own friend, for the profits of his good conduct

are all his own. It is astonishing how partial the people

are to this species of contract, and how diligently they

labor, acquiring or maintaining all the while those habits

which render them honorable and useful members of society. I

mention this to you, because the rich, much to their honor,

do not, in general, require to be so much stimulated to

benevolence, as to be directed in the most useful way to

exert it.

I have still a word to say about the poor of our own parish

of Parnassus. I have been applied to by a very worthy

friend, Mr. Scott of Sinton, in behalf of an unfortunate Mr.

Gilmour, who, it seems, has expended a little fortune in

printing, upon his own account, poems which, from the sample

I saw, seem exactly to answer the description of Dean

Swift's country house:--

"Too bad for a blessing, too good for a curse,

I wish from my soul they were better or worse."

{p.168} But you are the dean of our corporation, and, I am

informed, take some interest in this poor gentleman. If you

can point out any way in which I can serve him, I am sure my

inclination is not wanting, but it looks like a very

hopeless case. I beg my kindest respects to Mrs. Southey,

and am always sincerely and affectionately yours,

Walter SCOTT.

About this time Hogg took possession of Altrive Lake, and some of his

friends in Edinburgh set on foot a subscription edition of his Queen's

Wake (at a guinea each copy), in the hope of thus raising a sum

adequate to the stocking of the little farm. The following letter

alludes to this affair; and also to the death of Frances, Lady

Douglas, sister to Duke Henry of Buccleuch, whose early kindness to

Scott has been more than once mentioned.

TO THE RIGHT HON. LORD MONTAGU.

ABBOTSFORD, June 8, 1817.

MY DEAR LORD,--I am honored with your letter, and will not

fail to take care that the Shepherd profits by your kind

intentions, and those of Lady Montagu. This is a scheme

which I did not devise, for I fear it will end in

disappointment, but for which I have done, and will do, all

I possibly can. There is an old saying of the seamen's,

"Every man is not born to be a boatswain," and I think I

have heard of men born under a sixpenny planet, and doomed

never to be worth a groat. I fear something of this vile

sixpenny influence had gleamed in at the cottage window when

poor Hogg first came squeaking into the world. All that he

made by his original book he ventured on a flock of sheep to

drive into the Highlands to a farm he had taken there, but

of which he could not get possession, so that all the stock

was ruined and sold to disadvantage. Then he tried another

farm, which proved too dear, so that he fairly broke upon

it. Then put forth divers publications, {p.169} which had

little sale--and brought him accordingly few pence, though

some praise. Then came this Queen's Wake, by which he might

and ought to have made from £100 to £200--for there were, I

think, three editions--when lo! his bookseller turned

bankrupt, and paid him never a penny. The Duke has now, with

his wonted generosity, given him a cosie bield, and the

object of the present attack upon the public is to get if

possible as much cash together as will stock it. But no one

has loose guineas now to give poor poets, and I greatly

doubt the scheme succeeding, unless it is more strongly

patronized than can almost be expected. In bookselling

matters, an author must either be the conjurer, who commands

the devil, or the witch who serves him--and few are they

whose situation is sufficiently independent to enable them

to assume the higher character--and this is injurious to the

indigent author in every respect, for not only is he obliged

to turn his pen to every various kind of composition, and so

to injure himself with the public by writing hastily, and on

subjects unfitted for his genius; but, moreover, those

honest gentlemen, the booksellers, from a natural

association, consider the books as of least value, which

they find they can get at least expense of copy-money, and

therefore are proportionally careless in pushing the sale of

the work. Whereas a good round sum out of their purse, like

a moderate rise of rent on a farm, raises the work thus

acquired in their own eyes, and serves as a spur to make

them clear away every channel, by which they can discharge

their quires upon the public. So much for bookselling, the

most ticklish and unsafe and hazardous of all professions,

scarcely with the exception of horse-jockeyship.

You cannot doubt the sincere interest I take in Lady

Montagu's health. I was very glad to learn from the Duke,

that the late melancholy event had produced no permanent

effect on her constitution, as I know how {p.170} much her

heart must have suffered.[65] I saw our regretted friend for

the last time at the Theatre, and made many schemes to be at

Bothwell this next July. But thus the world glides from us,

and those we most love and honor are withdrawn from the

stage before us. I know not why it was that among the few

for whom I had so much respectful regard, I never had

associated the idea of early deprivation with Lady Douglas.

Her excellent sense, deep information, and the wit which she

wielded with so much good-humor, were allied apparently to a

healthy constitution, which might have permitted us to

enjoy, and be instructed by her society for many years. _Dis

aliter visum_, and the recollection dwelling on all the

delight which she afforded to society, and the good which

she did in private life, is what now remains to us of her

wit, wisdom, and benevolence. The Duke keeps his usual

health, with always just so much of the gout, however, as

would make me wish that he had more--a kind wish, for which

I do not observe that he is sufficiently grateful. I hope to

spend a few days at Drumlanrig Castle, when that ancient

mansion shall have so far limited its courtesy as to stand

covered in the presence of the wind and rain, which I

believe is not yet the case. I am no friend to ceremony, and

like a house as well when it does not carry its roof _en

chapeau bras_. I heartily wish your Lordship joy of the new

mansion at Ditton, and hope my good stars will permit me to

pay my respects there one day. The discovery of the niches

certainly bodes good luck to the house of Montagu, and as

there are three of them, I presume it is to come threefold.

From the care with which they were concealed, I presume they

had been closed in the days of Cromwell, or a little before,

and that the artist employed (like the {p.171} General, who

told his soldiers to fight bravely against the Pope, since

they were Venetians before they were Christians) had more

professional than religious zeal, and did not even,

according to the practice of the time, think it necessary to

sweep away Popery with the besom of destruction.[66] I am

here on a stolen visit of two days, and find my mansion

gradually enlarging. Thanks to Mr. Atkinson (who found out a

practical use for our romantic theory), it promises to make

a comfortable station for offering your Lordship and Lady

Montagu a pilgrim's meal, when you next visit Melrose Abbey,

and that without any risk of your valet (who I recollect is

a substantial person) sticking between the wall of the

parlor and the backs of the chairs placed round the table.

This literally befell Sir Harry Macdougal's fat butler, who

looked like a ship of the line in the loch at Bowhill,

altogether unlike his master, who could glide wherever a

weasel might make his way. Mr. Atkinson has indeed been more

attentive than I can express, when I consider how valuable

his time must be.[67] We are attempting no castellated

conundrums to rival those Lord Napier used to have executed

in sugar, when he was Commissioner, and no cottage neither,

but an irregular somewhat--like an old English hall, in

which your squire of £500 a year used to drink his ale in

days of yore.

[Footnote 65: Lady Montagu was the daughter of the late

Lord Douglas by his first marriage with Lady Lucy

Graham, daughter of the second Duke of Montrose.]

[Footnote 66: Lord Montagu's house at Ditton Park, near

Windsor, had recently been destroyed by fire--and the

ruins revealed some niches with antique candlesticks,

etc., belonging to a domestic chapel that had been

converted to other purposes from the time, I believe, of

Henry VIII.]

[Footnote 67: Mr. Atkinson, of St. John's Wood, was the

architect of Lord Montagu's new mansion at Ditton, as

well as the artist ultimately employed in arranging

Scott's interior at Abbotsford.]

I am making considerable plantations (that is, considering),

being greatly encouraged by the progress of those I formerly

laid out. Read the veracious Gulliver's account of the

Windsor Forest of Lilliput, and you will {p.172} have some

idea of the solemn gloom of my Druid shades. Your Lordship's

truly faithful

Walter SCOTT.

This is the 8th of June, and not an ash-tree in leaf yet.

The country cruelly backward, and whole fields destroyed by

the grub. I dread this next season.

{p.173} CHAPTER XXXIX.

Excursion to the Lennox, Glasgow, and Drumlanrig. --

Purchase of Toftfield. -- Establishment of the Ferguson

Family at Huntly Burn. -- Lines Written in Illness. --

Visits of Washington Irving, Lady Byron, and Sir David

Wilkie. -- Progress of the Building at Abbotsford. --

Letters to Morritt, Terry, etc. -- Conclusion of Rob Roy.

1817.

During the summer term of 1817, Scott seems to have labored chiefly on

his History of 1815 for the Register, which was published in August;

but he also found time to draw up the Introduction for a richly

embellished quarto, entitled Border Antiquities, which came out a

month later. This valuable essay, containing large additions to the

information previously embodied in the Minstrelsy, has been included

in the late collection of his Miscellaneous Prose, and has thus

obtained a circulation not to be expected for it in the original

costly form.

Upon the rising of the Court in July, he made an excursion to the

Lennox, chiefly that he might visit a cave at the head of Loch Lomond,

said to have been a favorite retreat of his hero, Rob Roy. He was

accompanied to the seat of his friend, Mr. Macdonald Buchanan, by

Captain Adam Ferguson--the _long Linton_ of the days of his

apprenticeship; and thence to Glasgow, where, under the auspices of a

kind and intelligent acquaintance, Mr. John Smith, bookseller, he

refreshed his recollection of the noble cathedral, and other

localities of the birthplace of Bailie Jarvie. Mr. Smith took care

also {p.174} to show the tourists the most remarkable novelties in

the great manufacturing establishments of his flourishing city; and he

remembers particularly the delight which Scott expressed on seeing the

process of _singeing_ muslin--that is, of divesting the finished web

of all superficial knots and irregularities, by passing it, with the

rapidity of lightning, over a bar of red-hot iron. "The man that

imagined this," said Scott, "was _the Shakespeare of the Wabsters_,--

'Things out of hope are compass'd oft with vent'ring.'"[68]

[Footnote 68: Shakespeare's Poems--_Venus and Adonis_.]

The following note indicates the next stages of his progress:--

TO HIS GRACE THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH, DRUMLANRIG CASTLE.

SANQUHAR, 2 o'clock, July 30,[69] 1817.

From Ross, where the clouds on Benlomond are sleeping--

From Greenock, where Clyde to the Ocean is sweeping--

From Largs, where the Scotch gave the Northmen a drilling--

From Ardrossan, whose harbor cost many a shilling--

From Old Cumnock, where beds are as hard as a plank, sir--

From a chop and green pease, and a chicken in Sanquhar,

This eve, please the Fates, at Drumlanrig we anchor.

W. S.

[Footnote 69: [A misprint of some earlier date, possibly

the _16th_. See the more detailed account of Scott's

movements at this time, to be found in _Familiar

Letters_, vol. i. pp. 432-436.]]

The Poet and Captain Ferguson remained a week at Drumlanrig, and

thence repaired together to Abbotsford. By this time, the foundations

of that part of the existing house, which extends from the hall

westwards to the original courtyard, had been laid; and Scott now

found a new source of constant occupation in watching the proceedings

of his masons. He had, moreover, no lack of employment further

a-field,--for he was now negotiating with another neighboring

landowner for the purchase of an addition, of more consequence than

any he had hitherto {p.175} made, to his estate. In the course of the

autumn he concluded this matter, and became, for the price of £10,000,

proprietor of the lands of _Toftfield_,[70] on which there had

recently been erected a substantial mansion-house, fitted, in all

points, for the accommodation of a genteel family. This circumstance

offered a temptation which much quickened Scott's zeal for completing

his arrangement. The venerable Professor Ferguson had died a year

before; Captain Adam Ferguson was at home on half-pay; and Scott now

saw the means of securing for himself, henceforth, the immediate

neighborhood of the companion of his youth, and his amiable sisters.

Ferguson, who had written, from the lines of Torres Vedras, his hopes

of finding, when the war should be over, some sheltering cottage upon

the Tweed, within a walk of Abbotsford, was delighted to see his

dreams realized; and the family took up their residence next spring at

the new house of Toftfield, on which Scott then bestowed, at the

ladies' request, the name of Huntly Burn: this more harmonious

designation being taken from the mountain brook which passes through

its grounds and garden,--the same famous in tradition as the scene of

Thomas the Rhymer's interviews with the Queen of Fairy. The upper part

of the _Rhymer's Glen_, through which this brook finds its way from

the Cauldshiels Loch to Toftfield, had been included in a previous

purchase. He was now master of all these haunts of "True Thomas," and

of the whole ground of the battle of Melrose, from _Skirmish-field_ to

_Turn-again_. His enjoyment of the new territories was, however,

interrupted by various returns of his cramp, and the depression of

spirit which always attended, in his case, the use of opium, {p.176}

the only medicine that seemed to have power over the disease.[71]

[Footnote 70: On completing this purchase, Scott writes

to John Ballantyne:--"DEAR JOHN,--I have closed with

Usher for his beautiful patrimony, which makes me a

great laird. I am afraid the people will take me up for

coining. Indeed, these novels, while their attractions

last, are something like it. I am very glad of _your_

good prospects. Still I cry, _Prudence!

Prudence!_--Yours truly,

W. S."]

[Footnote 71: [On August 1, 1817, Jeffrey writes to

Scott, asking if he could not be induced to write a

notice of Mr. C. K. Sharpe's edition of Kirkton's

_Secret and True History of the Church of Scotland_, for

the _Edinburgh Review_, to which Scott replies, August

5:--

"I flatter myself it will not require many protestations

to assure you with what pleasure I would undertake any

book that can give you pleasure; but in the present case

I am hampered by two circumstances: one, that I promised

Gifford a review of this very Kirkton for the

_Quarterly_; the other that I shall certainly be unable

to keep my word with him. I am obliged to take exercise

three or four hours in the forenoon and two after

dinner, to keep off the infernal spasms which since last

winter have attacked me with such violence, as if all

the imps that used to plague poor Caliban were washing,

wringing, and ironing the unshapely but useful bag which

Sir John Sinclair treats with such distinction--my

stomach, in short. Now, as I have much to do of my own,

I fear I can hardly be of use to you in the present

case, which I am very sorry for, as I like the subject,

and would be pleased to give my own opinion respecting

the Jacobitism of the editor, which, like my own, has a

good spice of affectation in it, mingled with some not

unnatural feelings of respect for a cause which, though

indefensible in common sense and ordinary policy, has a

great deal of high-spirited Quixotry about it.

"Can you not borrow from your briefs and criticism a

couple of days to look about you here? I dare not ask

Mrs. Jeffrey till next year, when my hand will be out of

the mortar-tub; and at present my only spare bed was

till of late but accessible by the feudal accommodation

of a drawbridge made of two deals, and still requires

the clue of Ariadne.... I am like one of Miss

Edgeworth's heroines, master of all things in

miniature--a little hill, and a little glen, and a

little horse-pond of a loch, and a little river, I was

going to call it,--the Tweed; but I remember the

minister was mobbed by his parishioners for terming it,

in his statistical report, an inconsiderable stream. So

pray do come and see me, and if I can stead you, or

pleasure you, in the course of the winter, you shall

command me."--Cockburn's _Life of Jeffrey_, vol. i p.

417.]]

It was while struggling with such languor, on one lovely evening of

this autumn, that he composed the following beautiful verses. They

mark the very spot of their birth,--namely, the then naked height

overhanging the northern side of the Cauldshiels Loch, from which

Melrose Abbey to the eastward, and the hills of Ettrick and Yarrow to

the west, are now visible over a wide range of rich woodland,--all the

work of the poet's hand:--

{p.177} "The sun upon the Weirdlaw Hill,

In Ettrick's vale, is sinking sweet;

The westland wind is hush and still--

The lake lies sleeping at my feet.

Yet not the landscape to mine eye

Bears those bright hues that once it bore;

Though evening, with her richest dye,

Flames o'er the hills of Ettrick's shore.

"With listless look along the plain

I see Tweed's silver current glide,

And coldly mark the holy fane

Of Melrose rise in ruin'd pride.

The quiet lake, the balmy air,

The hill, the stream, the tower, the tree,--

Are they still such as once they were,

Or is the dreary change in me?

"Alas! the warp'd and broken board,

How can it bear the painter's dye!

The harp of strain'd and tuneless chord,

How to the minstrel's skill reply!

To aching eyes each landscape lowers,

To feverish pulse each gale blows chill;

And Araby's or Eden's bowers

Were barren as this moorland hill."

He again alludes to his illness in a letter to Mr. Morritt:--

TO J. B. S. MORRITT, ESQ., M. P., ROKEBY.

ABBOTSFORD, August 11, 1817.

MY DEAR MORRITT,--I am arrived from a little tour in the

west of Scotland, and had hoped, in compliance with your

kind wish, to have indulged myself with a skip over the

Border as far as Rokeby, about the end of this month. But my

fate denies me this pleasure; for, in consequence of one or

two blunders, during my absence, in executing my new

premises, I perceive the necessity of remaining at the helm

while they are going on. Our masons, though excellent

workmen, are too little accustomed to the gimcracks of their

art, to be trusted with the execution of a _bravura_ plan,

without constant inspection. Besides, the said laborers lay

me under the necessity {p.178} of laboring a little myself;

and I find I can no longer with impunity undertake to make

one week's hard work supply the omissions of a fortnight's

idleness. Like you, I have abridged my

creature-comforts,--as Old Mortality would call

them,--renouncing beer and ale on all ordinary occasions;

also pastry, fruit, etc., and all that tends to acidity.

These are awkward warnings; but _sat est vixisse_. To have

lived respected and regarded by some of the best men in our

age is enough for an individual like me; the rest must be as

God wills, and when He wills.

The poor-laws, into which you have ventured for the love of

the country, form a sad quagmire. They are like John

Bunyan's Slough of Despond, into which, as he observes,

millions of cart-loads of good resolutions have been thrown,

without perceptibly mending the way. From what you say, and

from what I have heard from others, there is a very natural

desire to trust to one or two empirical remedies, such as

general systems of education, and so forth. But a man with a

broken constitution might as well put faith in Spilsbury or

Godbold. It is not the knowledge, but the use which is made

of it, that is productive of real benefit. To say that the

Scottish peasant is less likely than the Englishman to

become an incumbrance on his parish, is saying, in other

words, that this country is less populous,--that there are

fewer villages and towns,--that the agricultural classes,

from the landed proprietor down to the cottager, are

individually more knit and cemented together;--above all,

that the Scotch peasant has harder habits of life, and can

endure from his infancy a worse fare and lodging than your

parish almshouses offer.--There is a terrible evil in

England to which we are strangers,--the number, to wit, of

tippling-houses, where the laborer, as a matter of course,

spends the overplus of his earnings. In Scotland there are

few; and the Justices are commendably inexorable in

rejecting all application for licenses where {p.179} there

appears no public necessity for granting them. A man,

therefore, cannot easily spend much money in liquor, since

he must walk three or four miles to the place of suction and

back again, which infers a sort of _malice prepense_ of

which few are capable; and the habitual opportunity of

indulgence not being at hand, the habits of intemperance,

and of waste connected with it, are not acquired. If

financiers would admit a general limitation of the

ale-houses over England to one fourth of the number, I am

convinced you would find the money spent in that manner

would remain with the peasant, as a source of self-support

and independence.

All this applies chiefly to the country;--in towns, and in

the manufacturing districts, the evil could hardly be

diminished by such regulations. There would, perhaps, be no

means so effectual as that (which will never be listened to)

of taxing the manufacturers according to the number of hands

which they employ on an average, and applying the produce in

maintaining the manufacturing poor. If it should be alleged

that this would injure the manufacturers, I would boldly

reply,--"And why not injure, or rather limit, speculations,

the excessive stretch of which has been productive of so

much damage to the principles of the country, and to the

population, whom it has, in so many respects, degraded and

demoralized?" For a great many years, manufactures, taken in

a general point of view, have not partaken of the character

of a regular profession, in which all who engaged with

honest industry and a sufficient capital might reasonably

expect returns proportional to their advances and labor--but

have, on the contrary, rather resembled a lottery, in which

the great majority of the adventurers are sure to be losers,

although some may draw considerable advantage. Men continued

for a great many years to exert themselves, and to pay

extravagant wages, not in hopes that there could be a

reasonable prospect of an orderly and regular demand for the

goods they wrought {p.180} up, but in order that they might

be the first to take advantage of some casual opening which

might consume their cargo, let others shift as they could.

Hence extravagant wages on some occasions; for these

adventurers who thus played at hit or miss, stood on no

scruples while the chance of success remained open. Hence,

also, the stoppage of work, and the discharge of the

workmen, when the speculators failed of their object. All

this while the country was the sufferer;--for whoever

gained, the result, being upon the whole a loss, fell on the

nation, together with the task of maintaining a poor,

rendered effeminate and vicious by over-wages and

over-living, and necessarily cast loose upon society. I

cannot but think that the necessity of making some fund

beforehand, for the provision of those whom they debauch,

and render only fit for the almshouse, in prosecution of

their own adventures, though it operated as a check on the

increase of manufactures, would be a measure just in itself,

and beneficial to the community. But it would never be

listened to;--the weaver's beam, and the sons of Zeruiah,

would be too many for the proposers.

This is the eleventh of August: Walter, happier than he will

ever be again, perhaps, is preparing for the moors. He has a

better dog than Trout, and rather less active. Mrs. Scott

and all our family send kind love.

Yours ever,

W. S.

Two or three days after this letter was written, Scott first saw

Washington Irving, who has recorded his visit in a delightful Essay,

which, however, having been penned nearly twenty years afterwards,

betrays a good many slips of memory as to names and dates. Mr. Irving

says he arrived at Abbotsford on the 27th of August, 1816; but he

describes the walls of the new house as already overtopping the old

cottage; and this is far from being the only circumstance he mentions

which {p.181} proves that he should have written 1817.[72] The

picture which my amiable friend has drawn of his reception shows to

all who remember the Scott and the Abbotsford of those days, how

consistent accuracy as to essentials may be with forgetfulness of

trifles.

[Footnote 72: I have before me two letters of Mr.

Irving's to Scott, both written in September, 1817, from

Edinburgh, and referring to his visit (which certainly

was his only one at Abbotsford) as immediately

preceding. There is also in my hands a letter from Scott

to his friend John Richardson, of Fludyer Street, dated

22d September, 1817, in which he says, "When you see Tom

Campbell, tell him, with my best love, that I have to

thank him for making me known to Mr. Washington Irving,

who is one of the best and pleasantest acquaintances I

have made this many a day."]

Scott had received The History of New York by Knickerbocker, shortly

after its appearance in 1812, from an accomplished American traveller,

Mr. Brevoort; and the admirable humor of this early work had led him

to anticipate the brilliant career which its author has since run. Mr.

Thomas Campbell, being no stranger to Scott's high estimation of

Irving's genius, gave him a letter of introduction, which, halting his

chaise on the high-road above Abbotsford, he modestly sent down to the

house, "with a card, on which he had written, that he was on his way

to the ruins of Melrose, and wished to know whether it would be

agreeable to Mr. Scott to receive a visit from him in the course of

the morning." Scott's family well remember the delight with which he

received this announcement:--he was at breakfast, and sallied forth

instantly, dogs and children after him as usual, to greet the guest,

and conduct him in person from the highway to the door.

"The noise of my chaise," says Irving, "had disturbed the

quiet of the establishment. Out sallied the warder of the

castle, a black greyhound, and leaping on one of the blocks

of stone, began a furious barking. This alarm brought out

the whole garrison of dogs, all open-mouthed and vociferous.

In a little while, the lord of the castle himself made his

appearance. I knew him at once, by the likenesses that had

been {p.182} published of him. He came limping up the

gravel walk, aiding himself by a stout walking staff, but

moving rapidly and with vigor. By his side jogged along a

large iron-gray staghound, of most grave demeanor, who took

no part in the clamor of the canine rabble, but seemed to

consider himself bound, for the dignity of the house, to

give me a courteous reception.

"Before Scott reached the gate, he called out in a hearty

tone, welcoming me to Abbotsford, and asking news of

Campbell. Arrived at the door of the chaise, he grasped me

warmly by the hand: 'Come, drive down, drive down to the

house,' said he; 'ye're just in time for breakfast, and

afterwards ye shall see all the wonders of the Abbey.'

"I would have excused myself on the plea of having already

made my breakfast. 'Hut, man,' cried he, 'a ride in the

morning in the keen air of the Scotch hills is warrant

enough for a second breakfast.'

"I was accordingly whirled to the portal of the cottage, and

in a few moments found myself seated at the breakfast-table.

There was no one present but the family, which consisted of

Mrs. Scott; her eldest daughter, Sophia, then a fine girl

about seventeen; Miss Anne Scott, two or three years

younger; Walter, a well-grown stripling; and Charles, a

lively boy, eleven or twelve years of age.

"I soon felt myself quite at home, and my heart in a glow,

with the cordial welcome I experienced. I had thought to

make a mere morning visit, but found I was not to be let off

so lightly. 'You must not think our neighborhood is to be

read in a morning like a newspaper,' said Scott; 'it takes

several days of study for an observant traveller, that has a

relish for auld-world trumpery. After breakfast you shall

make your visit to Melrose Abbey; I shall not be able to

accompany you, as I have some household affairs to attend

to; but I will put you in charge of my son Charles, who is

very learned in all things touching the old ruin and the

neighborhood it stands in; and he and my friend Johnnie

Bower will tell you the whole truth about it, with a great

deal more that you are not called upon to believe, unless

you be a true and nothing-doubting antiquary. When you come

back, I'll take you out on a ramble about the neighborhood.

To-morrow we will take a {p.183} look at the Yarrow, and

the next day we will drive over to Dryburgh Abbey, which is

a fine old ruin, well worth your seeing.'--In a word, before

Scott had got through with his plan, I found myself

committed for a visit of several days, and it seemed as if a

little realm of romance was suddenly open before me."

After breakfast, while Scott, no doubt, wrote a chapter of Rob Roy,

Mr. Irving, under young Charles's guidance, saw Melrose Abbey, and

Johnnie Bower the elder, whose son long since inherited his office as

showman of the ruins, and all his enthusiasm about them and their

poet. The senior on this occasion was loud in his praises of the

affability of Scott. "He'll come here sometimes," said he, "with great

folks in his company, and the first I'll know of it is hearing his

voice calling out Johnnie!--Johnnie Bower!--and when I go out I'm sure

to be greeted with a joke or a pleasant word. He'll stand and crack,

an' laugh wi' me just like an auld wife,--and _to think that of a man

that has such an awfu' knowledge o' history!_"[73]

[Footnote 73: [From the journal of three English ladies,

travellers in Scotland in the summer of 1817, we get

another glimpse of Johnnie Bower, and a pleasant sketch

of Sophia Scott:--

"In the chancel Miss Scott, a very charming, lively girl

of seventeen, pointed out to us 'The Wizard's Grave,'

and then the black stone in the form of a coffin, to

which the allusion is made in the poem, 'A Scottish

monarch sleeps below,'--said to be the tomb of Alexander

II. 'But I will tell you a secret,' she half whispered;

'only don't you tell Johnnie Bower. There is no Scottish

monarch there at all, nor anybody else, for papa had the

stone taken up, not long ago, and no coffin nor anything

was to be found. And then Johnnie came and begged me not

to tell people so. "For what wull I do, Miss Scott, when

I show the ruins, if I canna point to this bit, and say,

'A Scottish monarch sleeps below'?"' As, however, he had

the pleasure of saying this to us the evening before,

Miss Scott thought we might fairly have her secret....

"We now set out for Dryburgh, about five miles. Mr.

Scott placed his daughter in our carriage, that she

might point out the different places as we passed them.

We could not have had a better director, nor a more

lively, entertaining companion. Every spot was known to

her, and in this fairyland her quick imagination seemed

to delight in all the legendary lore she had heard, and

could so promptly apply.... At the view of some distant

mountains, Miss Scott suddenly exclaimed, 'Look, there

are the Cheviots; are you not glad to see England

again?' We assured her we were, though we should quit

Scotland with so much regret. 'Well,' she said, 'I

should not have liked you if you were not glad to return

home.' Her father had taken her to London the year

before, and she was delighted to get back again, and to

hail the Cheviots on her return. It was plain to see she

was her father's darling, and she talked of him with

enthusiasm. She has a very natural, unaffected

character, with a strong tincture of romantic feeling,

which seemed judiciously kept in check by him, as she

said he did not allow her to read much poetry, nor had

she even read all his own poems, which were never to be

found _in the way_, at their house. She spoke of her

sister and her brothers, with a warmth of affection very

pleasing. On asking what was become of Camp, she shook

her head, and said he was dead. 'You must never come to

Abbotsford when any of the dogs die, for there is a sad

weeping amongst us all.'"--Lang's _Life of Lockhart_,

vol. i. pp. 232-234.]]

{p.184} On his return from the Abbey, Irving found Scott ready for a

ramble. I cannot refuse myself the pleasure of extracting some parts

of his description of it.

"As we sallied forth, every dog in the establishment turned

out to attend us. There was the old staghound, Maida, that I

have already mentioned, a noble animal, and Hamlet, the

black greyhound, a wild thoughtless youngster, not yet

arrived at the years of discretion; and Finette, a beautiful

setter, with soft, silken hair, long pendent ears, and a

mild eye, the parlor favorite. When in front of the house,

we were joined by a superannuated greyhound, who came from

the kitchen wagging his tail; and was cheered by Scott as an

old friend and comrade. In our walks, he would frequently

pause in conversation, to notice his dogs, and speak to them

as if rational companions; and, indeed, there appears to be

a vast deal of rationality in these faithful attendants on

man, derived from their close intimacy with him. Maida

deported himself with a gravity becoming his age and size,

and seemed to consider himself called upon to preserve a

great degree of dignity and decorum in our society. As he

jogged along a little distance ahead of us, the young dogs

would gambol about him, leap on his neck, worry at his ears,

and endeavor to tease him into a gambol. The old dog would

keep on for a long time with imperturbable solemnity, now

and then seeming to rebuke the wantonness of his young

companions. At length he would make a sudden turn, seize one

of them, and tumble him in the dust, then giving a {p.185}

glance at us, as much as to say, 'You see, gentlemen, I

can't help giving way to this nonsense,' would resume his

gravity, and jog on as before. Scott amused himself with

these peculiarities. 'I make no doubt,' said he, 'when Maida

is alone with these young dogs, he throws gravity aside, and

plays the boy as much as any of them; but he is ashamed to

do so in our company, and seems to say--Ha' done with your

nonsense, youngsters: what will the laird and that other

gentleman think of me if I give way to such foolery?'

"Scott amused himself with the peculiarities of another of

his dogs, a little shamefaced terrier, with large glassy

eyes, one of the most sensitive little bodies to insult and

indignity in the world. 'If ever he whipped him,' he said,

'the little fellow would sneak off and hide himself from the

light of day in a lumber garret, from whence there was no

drawing him forth but by the sound of the chopping-knife, as

if chopping up his victuals, when he would steal forth with

humiliated and downcast look, but would skulk away again if

any one regarded him.'

"While we were discussing the humors and peculiarities of

our canine companions, some object provoked their spleen,

and produced a sharp and petulant barking from the smaller

fry; but it was some time before Maida was sufficiently

roused to ramp forward two or three bounds, and join the

chorus with a deep-mouthed _bow wow_. It was but a transient

outbreak, and he returned instantly, wagging his tail, and

looking up dubiously in his master's face, uncertain whether

he would receive censure or applause. 'Ay, ay, old boy!'

cried Scott, 'you have done wonders; you have shaken the

Eildon hills with your roaring: you may now lay by your

artillery for the rest of the day. Maida,' continued he, 'is

like the great gun at Constantinople; it takes so long to

get it ready, that the smaller guns can fire off a dozen

times first: but when it does go off, it plays the very

devil.'

"These simple anecdotes may serve to show the delightful

play of Scott's humors and feelings in private life. His

domestic animals were his friends. Everything about him

seemed to rejoice in the light of his countenance.

"Our ramble took us on the hills commanding an extensive

prospect. 'Now,' said Scott, 'I have brought you, like the

pilgrim in the Pilgrim's Progress, to the top of the

Delectable {p.186} Mountains, that I may show you all the

goodly regions hereabouts. Yonder is Lammermuir, and

Smailholm; and there you have Galashiels, and Torwoodlee,

and Gala Water; and in that direction you see Teviotdale and

the Braes of Yarrow, and Ettrick stream winding along like a

silver thread, to throw itself into the Tweed.' He went on

thus to call over names celebrated in Scottish song, and

most of which had recently received a romantic interest from

his own pen. In fact, I saw a great part of the Border

country spread out before me, and could trace the scenes of

those poems and romances which had in a manner bewitched the

world.

"I gazed about me for a time with mute surprise, I may

almost say with disappointment. I beheld a mere succession

of gray waving hills, line beyond line, as far as my eye

could reach, monotonous in their aspect, and so destitute of

trees, that one could almost see a stout fly walking along

their profile; and the far-famed Tweed appeared a naked

stream, flowing between bare hills, without a tree or

thicket on its banks; and yet such had been the magic web of

poetry and romance thrown over the whole, that it had a

greater charm for me than the richest scenery I had beheld

in England. I could not help giving utterance to my

thoughts. Scott hummed for a moment to himself, and looked

grave; he had no idea of having his Muse complimented at the

expense of his native hills. 'It may be pertinacity,' said

he at length; 'but to my eye, these gray hills, and all this

wild Border country, have beauties peculiar to themselves. I

like the very nakedness of the land; it has something bold,

and stern, and solitary about it. When I have been for some

time in the rich scenery about Edinburgh, which is like

ornamented garden land, I begin to wish myself back again

among my own honest gray hills; and if I did not see the

heather, at least once a year, _I think I should die!_' The

last words were said with an honest warmth, accompanied by a

thump on the ground with his staff, by way of emphasis, that

showed his heart was in his speech. He vindicated the Tweed,

too, as a beautiful stream in itself; and observed that he

did not dislike it for being bare of trees, probably from

having been much of an angler in his time; and an angler

does not like to have a stream overhung by trees, which

embarrass him in the exercise of his rod and line.

{p.187} "I took occasion to plead, in like manner, the

associations of early life for my disappointment in respect

to the surrounding scenery. I had been so accustomed to see

hills crowned with forests, and streams breaking their way

through a wilderness of trees, that all my ideas of romantic

landscape were apt to be well wooded. 'Ay, and that's the

great charm of your country,' cried Scott. 'You love the

forest as I do the heather; but I would not have you think I

do not feel the glory of a great woodland prospect. There is

nothing I should like more than to be in the midst of one of

your grand wild original forests, with the idea of hundreds

of miles of untrodden forest around me. I once saw at Leith

an immense stick of timber, just landed from America. It

must have been an enormous tree when it stood in its native

soil, at its full height, and with all its branches. I gazed

at it with admiration; it seemed like one of the gigantic

obelisks which are now and then brought from Egypt to shame

the pigmy monuments of Europe; and, in fact, these vast

aboriginal trees, that have sheltered the Indians before the

intrusion of the white men, are the monuments and

antiquities of your country.'

"The conversation here turned upon Campbell's poem of

Gertrude of Wyoming, as illustrative of the poetic materials

furnished by American scenery. Scott cited several passages

of it with great delight. 'What a pity it is,' said he,

'that Campbell does not write more, and oftener, and give

full sweep to his genius! He has wings that would bear him

to the skies; and he does, now and then, spread them

grandly, but folds them up again, and resumes his perch, as

if he was afraid to launch away. What a grand idea is that,'

said he, 'about prophetic boding, or, in common parlance,

second sight--

"Coming events cast their shadows before!"--

The fact is,' added he, 'Campbell is, in a manner, a bugbear

to himself. The brightness of his early success is a

detriment to all his further efforts. _He is afraid of the

shadow that his own fame casts before him._'

"We had not walked much farther, before we saw the two Miss

Scotts advancing along the hillside to meet us. The

morning's studies being over, they had set off to take a

ramble on the hills, and gather heather blossoms with which

to decorate {p.188} their hair for dinner. As they came

bounding lightly like young fawns, and their dresses

fluttering in the pure summer breeze, I was reminded of

Scott's own description of his children, in his introduction

to one of the cantos of Marmion:--

'My imps, though hardy, bold, and wild,

As best befits the mountain child,' etc.

As they approached, the dogs all sprang forward, and

gambolled around them. They joined us with countenances full

of health and glee. Sophia, the eldest, was the most lively

and joyous, having much of her father's varied spirit in

conversation, and seeming to catch excitement from his words

and looks; Anne was of a quieter mood, rather silent, owing,

in some measure, no doubt, to her being some years

younger."[74]

[Footnote 74: ["His daughter Sophia and his son Charles

were those of his family who seemed most to feel and

understand his humors, and to take delight in his

conversation. Mrs. Scott did not always pay the same

attention, and would now and then make a casual remark

which would operate a little like a damper. Thus, one

morning at breakfast, when Dominie Thomson the tutor was

present, Scott was going on with great glee to relate an

anecdote of the laird of Macnab, 'who, poor fellow!'

premised he, 'is dead and gone.' 'Why, Mr. Scott,'

exclaimed the good lady, 'Macnab's not dead, is he?'

'Faith, my dear,' replied Scott, with humorous gravity,

'if he's not dead, they've done him a great

injustice,--for they've buried him.'

"The joke passed harmless and unnoticed by Mrs. Scott,

but hit the poor Dominie just as he had raised a cup of

tea to his lips ... sending half its contents about the

table."--Irving's _Abbotsford_.]]

Having often, many years afterwards, heard Irving speak warmly of

William Laidlaw, I must not omit the following passage:--

"One of my pleasantest rambles with Scott about the

neighborhood of Abbotsford was taken in company with Mr.

William Laidlaw, the steward of his estate. This was a

gentleman for whom Scott entertained a particular value. He

had been born to a competency, had been well educated, his

mind was richly stored with varied information, and he was a

man of sterling moral worth. Having been reduced by

misfortune, Scott had got him to take charge of his estate.

He lived at a small farm, on the hillside above Abbotsford,

and was treated {p.189} by Scott as a cherished and

confidential friend, rather than a dependant.

"That day at dinner we had Mr. Laidlaw and his wife, and a

female friend who accompanied them. The latter was a very

intelligent respectable person, about the middle age, and

was treated with particular attention and courtesy by Scott.

Our dinner was a most agreeable one, for the guests were

evidently cherished visitors to the house, and felt that

they were appreciated. When they were gone, Scott spoke of

them in the most cordial manner. 'I wished to show you,'

said he, 'some of our really excellent, plain Scotch people:

not fine gentlemen and ladies, for such you can meet

everywhere, and they are everywhere the same. The character

of a nation is not to be learnt from its fine folks.' He

then went on with a particular eulogium on the lady who had

accompanied the Laidlaws. She was the daughter, he said, of

a poor country clergyman, who had died in debt, and left her

an orphan and destitute. Having had a good plain education,

she immediately set up a child's school, and had soon a

numerous flock under her care, by which she earned a decent

maintenance. That, however, was not her main object. Her

first care was to pay off her father's debts, that no ill

word or ill will might rest upon his memory. This, by dint

of Scotch economy, backed by filial reverence and pride, she

accomplished, though in the effort she subjected herself to

every privation. Not content with this, she in certain

instances refused to take pay for the tuition of the

children of some of her neighbors, who had befriended her

father in his need, and had since fallen into poverty. 'In a

word,' added Scott, 'she's a fine old Scotch girl, and I

delight in her more than in many a fine lady I have known,

and I have known many of the finest.'

"The evening passed away delightfully in a quaint-looking

apartment, half study, half drawing-room. Scott read several

passages from the old Romance of Arthur, with a fine deep

sonorous voice, and a gravity of tone that seemed to suit

the antiquated black-letter volume. It was a rich treat to

hear such a work read by such a person, and in such a place;

and his appearance, as he sat reading, in a large armchair,

with his favorite hound Maida at his feet, and surrounded by

books and reliques and Border trophies, would have formed

{p.190} an admirable and most characteristic picture. When

I retired for the night, I found it almost impossible to

sleep: the idea of being under the roof of Scott; of being

on the Borders on the Tweed; in the very centre of that

region which had, for some time past, been the favorite

scene of romantic fiction; and, above all, the recollections

of the ramble I had taken, the company in which I had taken

it, and the conversation which had passed, all fermented in

my mind, and nearly drove sleep from my pillow.

"On the following morning the sun darted his beams from over

the hills through the low lattice of my window. I rose at an

early hour, and looked out between the branches of eglantine

which overhung the casement. To my surprise, Scott was

already up, and forth, seated on a fragment of stone, and

chatting with the workmen employed in the new building. I

had supposed, after the time he had wasted upon me

yesterday, he would be closely occupied this morning: but he

appeared like a man of leisure, who had nothing to do but

bask in the sunshine, and amuse himself. I soon dressed

myself and joined him. He talked about his proposed plans of

Abbotsford: happy would it have been for him could he have

contented himself with his delightful little vine-covered

cottage, and the simple, yet hearty and hospitable, style in

which he lived at the time of my visit."[75]

[Footnote 75: [That this visit remained a vivid and

delightful memory to the end of Irving's life is shown

in some words spoken not long before his death: "Oh!

Scott was a master spirit--as glorious in his

conversation as in his writings. Jeffrey was delightful,

and had _eloquent runs_ in conversation; but there was a

consciousness of talent with it. Scott had nothing of

that. He spoke from the fulness of his mind, pouring out

an incessant flow of anecdote, story, with dashes of

humor, and then never monopolizing, but always ready to

listen to and appreciate what came from others. I never

felt such a consciousness of happiness as when under his

roof."--_Washington Irving's Life and Letters_, vol. iv.

p. 260.]]

Among other visitors who succeeded the distinguished American that

autumn, were Lady Byron, the wife of the poet, and the great artist,

Mr., now Sir David Wilkie, who then executed for Captain Ferguson that

pleasing little picture, in which Scott and his family are represented

as a group of peasants, while the gallant soldier {p.191} himself

figures by them in the character of a gamekeeper, or perhaps poacher.

Mr. Irving has given, in the little work from which I have quoted so

liberally, an amusing account of the delicate scruples of Wilkie about

soliciting Scott to devote a morning to the requisite sitting, until,

after lingering for several days, he at length became satisfied that,

by whatever magic his host might contrive to keep Ballantyne's presses

in full play, he had always abundance of leisure for matters less

important than Ferguson's destined heirloom. I shall now, however,

return to his correspondence; and begin with a letter to Joanna

Baillie on Lady Byron's visit.

TO MISS JOANNA BAILLIE, HAMPSTEAD.

ABBOTSFORD, September 26, 1817.

MY DEAR MISS BAILLIE,--A series of little trinketty sort of

business, and occupation, and idleness, have succeeded to

each other so closely, that I have been scarce able, for

some three weeks past, to call my time my own for half an

hour together; but enough of apologies--they are vile

things, and I know you will impute my negligence to anything

rather than forgetting or undervaluing your friendship. You

know, by this time, that we have had a visit from Lady

Byron, delightful both on its own account, and because it

was accompanied with good news and a letter from you. I

regret we could not keep her longer than a day with us,

which was spent on the banks of the Yarrow, and I hope and

believe she was pleased with us, because I am sure she will

be so with everything that is intended to please her:

meantime her visit gave me a most lawyer-like fit of the

bile. I have lived too long to be surprised at any instance

of human caprice, but still it vexes me. Now, one would

suppose Lady Byron, young, beautiful, with birth, and rank,

and fortune, and taste, and high accomplishments, and

admirable good sense, qualified to have made happy one whose

talents are so high as Lord Byron's, and whose marked

{p.192} propensity it is to like those who are qualified to

admire and understand his talents; and yet it has proved

otherwise. I can safely say my heart ached for her all the

time we were together; there was so much patience and decent

resignation to a situation which must have pressed on her

thoughts, that she was to me one of the most interesting

creatures I had seen for a score of years. I am sure I

should not have felt such strong kindness towards her had

she been at the height of her fortune, and in the full

enjoyment of all the brilliant prospects to which she seemed

destined.--You will wish to hear of my complaint. I think,

thank God, that it is leaving me--not suddenly, however, for

I have had some repetitions, but they have become fainter

and fainter, and I have not been disturbed by one for these

three weeks. I trust, by care and attention, my stomach will

return to its usual tone, and I am as careful as I can. I

have taken hard exercise with good effect, and am often six

hours on foot without stopping or sitting down, to which my

plantations and enclosures contribute not a little. I have,

however, given up the gun this season, finding myself unable

to walk up to the dogs; but Walter has taken it in hand, and

promises to be a first-rate shot; he brought us in about

seven or eight brace of birds the evening Lady Byron came to

us, which papa was of course a little proud of. The

blackcocks are getting very plenty on our moor-ground at

Abbotsford, but I associate them so much with your beautiful

poem,[76] that I have not the pleasure I used to have in

knocking them down. I wish I knew how to send you a brace. I

get on with my labors here; my house is about to be roofed

in, and a comical concern it is.

Yours truly,

W. S.

[Footnote 76:

"Good-morrow to thy sable beak,

And glossy plumage dark and sleek,

Thy crimson moon, and azure eye,

Cock of the heath, so wildly shy!" etc.]

{p.193} The next letter refers to the Duke of Buccleuch's preparations

for a cattle-show at Bowhill, which was followed by an entertainment

on a large scale to his Grace's Selkirkshire neighbors and tenantry,

and next day by a fox-hunt, after Dandie Dinmont's fashion, among the

rocks of the Yarrow. The Sheriff attended _with his tail on_; and

Wilkie, too, went with him. It was there that Sir David first saw

Hogg, and the Shepherd's greeting was graceful. He eyed the great

painter for a moment in silence, and then stretching out his hand,

said: "Thank God for it. I did not know that you were so young a man!"

TO THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH, ETC., ETC., ETC., DRUMLANRIG CASTLE.

MY DEAR LORD DUKE,--I am just honored with your Grace's of

the 27th. The posts, which are as cross as pie-crust, have

occasioned some delay. Depend on our attending at Bowhill on

the 20th, and staying over the show. I have written to Adam

Ferguson, who will come with a whoop and a hollo. So will

the Ballantynes--flageolet[77] and all--for the festival,

and they shall be housed at Abbotsford. I have an inimitably

good songster in the person of Terence Magrath, who teaches

my girls. He beats almost all whom I have ever heard attempt

Moore's songs, and I can easily cajole him also out to

Abbotsford for a day or two. In jest or earnest, I never

heard a better singer in a room, though his voice is not

quite full enough for a concert; and for an after-supper

song, he almost equals Irish Johnstone.[78]

[Footnote 77: The _flageolet_ alludes to Mr. Alexander

Ballantyne, the third of the brothers--a fine musician,

and a most amiable and modest man, never connected with

Scott in any business matters, but always much his

favorite in private.]

[Footnote 78: Mr. Magrath has now been long established

in his native city of Dublin. His musical excellence was

by no means the only merit that attached Scott to his

society while he remained in Edinburgh.]

Trade of every kind is recovering, and not a loom idle

{p.194} in Glasgow. The most faithful respects of this

family attend the Ladies and all at Drumlanrig. I ever am

your Grace's truly obliged and grateful

Walter SCOTT.

Given from my Castle of Grawacky,

this second day of the month called

October, One Thousand Eight Hundred

and Seventeen Years.

There is a date nearly as long as the letter.

I hope we shall attack the foxes at Bowhill. I will hazard

Maida.

We have some allusions to this Bowhill party in another letter; the

first of several which I shall now insert according to their dates,

leaving them, with a few marginal notes, to tell out the story of

1817:--

TO DANIEL TERRY, ESQ., LONDON.

ABBOTSFORD, October 24, 1817.

DEAR TERRY,--Bullock has not gone to Skye, and I am very

glad he has not, for to me who knew the Hebrides well, the

attempt seemed very perilous at this season. I have

considerably enlarged my domains since I wrote to you, by

the purchase of a beautiful farm adjacent. The farmhouse,

which is new and excellent, I have let to Adam Ferguson and

his sisters. We will be within a pleasant walk of each

other, and hope to end our lives, as they began, in each

other's society. There is a beautiful brook, with remnants

of natural wood, which would make Toftfield rival

Abbotsford, but for the majestic Tweed. I am in treaty for a

field or two more; one of which contains the only specimen

of a Peel-house, or defensive residence of a small

proprietor, which remains in this neighborhood. It is an

orchard, in the hamlet of Darnick, to which it gives a most

picturesque effect. Blore admires it very much. We are all

well here, but crowded with company. I have been junketing

{p.195} this week past at Bowhill. Mr. Magrath has been

with us these two or three days, and has seen his ward,

Hamlet, behave most _princelike_ on Newark Hill and

elsewhere. He promises to be a real treasure.[79]

Notwithstanding, Mr. Magrath went to Bowhill with me one

day, where his vocal talents gave great pleasure, and I hope

will procure him the notice and protection of the Buccleuch

family. The Duke says my building engrosses, as a common

centre, the thoughts of Mr. Atkinson and Mr. Bullock, and

wishes he could make them equally anxious in his own behalf.

You may believe this flatters me not a little.

[Footnote 79: This fine greyhound, a gift from Terry,

had been sent to Scotland under the care of Mr. Magrath.

Terry had called the dog _Marmion_, but Scott

rechristened him _Hamlet_, in honor of his "inky coat."]

P. S.--I agree with you that the tower will look rather rich

for the rest of the building; yet you may be assured, that

with diagonal chimneys and notched gables, it will have a

very fine effect, and is in Scotch architecture by no means

incompatible. My house has been like a _cried fair_, and

extreme the inconvenience of having no corner sacred to my

own use, and free from intrusion.

Ever truly yours,

W. S.

TO THE SAME.

ABBOTSFORD, 29th October, 1817.

MY DEAR TERRY,--I enclose a full sketch of the lower story,

with accurate measurements of rooms, casements, doorways,

chimneys, etc., that Mr. Atkinson's good will may not want

means to work upon. I will speak to the subjects of your

letters separately, that I may omit none of them. _1st_, I

cannot possibly surrender the window to the west in the

library,[80] although I subscribe to all you urge about it.

Still it is essential in point of light to my old eyes, and

the single northern {p.196} aspect would not serve me.

Above all, it looks into the yard, and enables me to summon

Tom Purdie without the intervention of a third party.

Indeed, as I can have but a few books about me, it is of the

less consequence. _2dly_, I resign the idea of _coving_ the

library to your better judgment, and I think the Stirling

Heads[81] will be admirably disposed in the glass of the

armory window. I have changed my mind as to having doors on

the book-presses, which is, after all, a great bore. No

person will be admitted into my sanctum, and I can have the

door locked during my absence. _3dly_, I expect Mr. Bullock

here every day, and should be glad to have the drawings for

the dining-room wainscot, as he could explain them to the

artists who are to work them. This (always if quite

convenient) would be the more desirable, as I must leave

this place in a fortnight at farthest,--the more 's the

pity,--and, consequently, the risk of blunders will be

considerably increased. I should like if the panelling of

the wainscot could admit of a press on each side of the

sideboard. I don't mean a formal press with a high door, but

some crypt, or, to speak vulgarly, _cupboard_, to put away

bottles of wine, etc. You know I am my own butler, and such

accommodation is very convenient. We begin roofing

to-morrow. Wilkie admires the whole as a composition, and

that is high authority. I agree that the fountain shall be

out of doors in front of the greenhouse; there may be an

enclosure for it with some ornamented mason work, as in old

gardens, and it will occupy an angle, which I should be

puzzled what to do with, for turf and gravel would be rather

meagre, and flowers not easily kept. I have the old fountain

belonging to the Cross of Edinburgh, which flowed with wine

at the coronation of our kings and on other occasions of

{p.197} public rejoicing. I send a sketch of this venerable

relic, connected as it is with a thousand associations. It

is handsome in its forms and proportions--a freestone basin

about three feet in diameter, and five inches and a half in

depth, very handsomely hollowed. A piece has been broken off

one edge, but as we have the fragment, it can easily be

restored with cement. There are four openings for pipes in

the circumference--each had been covered with a Gothic

masque, now broken off and defaced, but which may be easily

restored. Through these the wine had fallen into a larger

and lower reservoir. I intend this for the centre of my

fountain. I do not believe I should save £100 by retaining

Mrs. Redford, by the time she was raised, altered, and

beautified, for, like the Highlandman's gun, she wants

stock, lock, and barrel, to put her into repair. In the mean

time, "the cabin is convenient." Yours ever,

W. S.

[Footnote 80: Before the second and larger part of the

present house of Abbotsford was built, the small room,

subsequently known as the breakfast parlor, was during

several years Scott's _sanctum_.]

[Footnote 81: This alludes to certain pieces of painted

glass, representing the heads of some of the old Scotch

kings, copied from the carved ceiling of the

presence-chamber in Stirling Castle. There are

engravings of them in a work called _Lacunar

Strevelinense_. Edinb. 4to, 1817.]

TO MR. WILLIAM LAIDLAW, KAESIDE.

EDINBURGH, November 15, 1817.

DEAR WILLIE,--I have no intention to let the Whitehaugh

without your express approbation, and I wish you to act as

my adviser and representative in these matters. I would

hardly have ventured to purchase so much land without the

certainty of your counsel and cooperation.... On the other

side you will find a small order on the banker at

Galashiels, to be renewed half yearly; not by way of

recompensing your friendship "with a load of barren money,"

but merely to ease my conscience in some degree for the time

which I must necessarily withdraw from the labor which is to

maintain your family. Believe me, dear Willie, yours truly,

W. SCOTT.

TO THE SAME.

EDINBURGH, 19th November, 1817.

DEAR WILLIE,--I hope you will not quarrel with my last.

Believe me that, to a sound-judging, and philosophical

{p.198} mind, this same account of Dr. and Cr., which fills

up so much time in the world, is comparatively of very small

value. When you get rich, unless I thrive in the same

proportion, I will request your assistance for less, for

little, or for nothing, as the case may require; but while I

wear my seven-leagued boots to stride in triumph over moss

and muir, it would be very silly in either of us to let a

cheque twice a year of £25 make a difference between us. But

all this we will talk over when we meet. I meditate one day

a _coup-de-maître_, which will make my friend's advice and

exertion essential--indeed worthy of much better

remuneration. When you come, I hope you will bring us

information of all my rural proceedings. Though so lately

come to town, I still remember, at my waking hours, that I

can neither see Tom Purdie nor Adam Paterson,[82] and rise

with the more unwillingness. I was unwell on Monday and

Tuesday, but am quite recovered.

Yours truly,

W. S.

[Footnote 82: Adam Paterson was the intelligent foreman

of the company of masons then employed at Abbotsford.]

TO THOMAS SCOTT, ESQ., PAYMASTER, 70TH REGIMENT, KINGSTON, CANADA.

EDINBURGH, 13th December, 1817.

MY DEAR TOM,--I should be happy to attend to your commission

about a dominie for your boy, but I think there will be much

risk in yoking yourself with one for three or four years.

You know what sort of black cattle these are, and how

difficult it is to discern their real character, though one

may give a guess at their attainments. When they get good

provender in their guts, they are apt to turn out very

different animals from what they were in their original low

condition, and get frisky and troublesome. I have made

several inquiries, however, and request to know what salary

you would think reasonable, and also what acquisitions he

ought to possess. {p.199} There is no combating the

feelings which you express for the society of your son,

otherwise I really think that a Scottish education would be

highly desirable; and should you at any time revert to this

plan, you may rely on my bestowing the same attention upon

him as upon my own boys.

I agree entirely with you on the necessity of your remaining

in the regiment while it is stationary, and retiring on

half-pay when it marches; but I cannot so easily acquiesce

in your plan of settling in Canada. On the latter event

taking place, on the contrary, I think it would be highly

advisable that you should return to your native country. In

the course of nature you must soon be possessed of

considerable property, now life-rented by our mother, and I

should think that even your present income would secure you

comfort and independence here. Should you remain in Canada,

you must consider your family as settlers in that state, and

as I cannot believe that it will remain very long separated

from America, I should almost think this equal to depriving

them of the advantages of British subjects--at least of

those which they might derive from their respectable

connections in this country. With respect to your son, in

particular, I have little doubt that I could be of

considerable service to him in almost any line of life he

might chance to adopt here, but could of course have less

influence on his fortunes were he to remain on the Niagara.

I certainly feel anxious on this subject, because the

settlement of your residence in America would be saying, in

other words, that we two, the last remains of a family once

so numerous, are never more to meet upon this side of time.

My own health is very much broken up by the periodical

recurrence of violent cramps in the stomach, which neither

seem disposed to yield to medicine nor to abstinence. The

complaint, the doctors say, is not dangerous in itself, but

I cannot look forward to its continued recurrence, without

being certain that it is to break my health, and {p.200}

anticipate old age in cutting me short. Be it so, my dear

Tom--_Sat est vixisse_--and I am too much of a philosopher

to be anxious about protracted life, which, with all its

infirmities and deprivations, I have never considered as a

blessing. In the years which may be before me, it would be a

lively satisfaction to me to have the pleasure of seeing you

in this country, with the prospect of a comfortable

settlement. I have but an imperfect account to render of my

doings here. I have amused myself with making an addition to

my cottage in the country. One little apartment is to be

fitted up as an armory for my old relics and curiosities. On

the wicket I intend to mount your _deer's foot_[83]--as an

appropriate knocker. I hope the young ladies liked their

watches, and that all your books, stationery, etc., came

safe to hand. I am told you have several kinds of the oak

peculiar to America. If you can send me a few good acorns,

with the names of the kinds they belong to, I will have them

reared with great care and attention. The heaviest and

smoothest acorns should be selected, as one would wish them,

sent from such a distance, to succeed, which rarely happens

unless they are particularly well ripened. I shall be as

much obliged to you as Sancho was to the Duchess, or, to

speak more correctly, the Duchess to Sancho, for a similar

favor. Our mother keeps her health surprisingly well now,

nor do I think there is any difference, unless that her

deafness is rather increased. My eldest boy is upwards of

six feet high; therefore born, as Sergeant Kite says, to be

a great man. I should not like such a rapid growth, but that

he carries strength along with it; my youngest boy is a very

sharp little fellow--and the girls give us great

satisfaction. Ever affectionately yours,

Walter SCOTT.

[Footnote 83: Thomas Scott had sent his brother the

horns and feet of a gigantic stag, shot by him in

Canada. The feet were ultimately suspended to bell-cords

in the armory at Abbotsford; and the horns mounted as

drinking-cups.]

{p.201} The following note is without date. It accompanied, no doubt,

the last proof sheet of Rob Roy, and was therefore in all probability

written about ten days before the 31st of December, 1817--on which day

the novel was published.

TO MR. JAMES BALLANTYNE, ST. JOHN STREET.

DEAR JAMES,--

With great joy

I send you Roy.

'T was a tough job,

But we're done with Rob.

I forget if I mentioned Terry in my list of Friends. Pray

send me two or three copies as soon as you can. It were pity

to make the Grinder[84] pay carriage.

Yours ever,

W. S.

[Footnote 84: They called Daniel Terry among themselves

"The Grinder," in double allusion to the song of _Terry

the Grinder_, and to some harsh under-notes of their

friend's voice.]

The novel had indeed been "a tough job"--for lightly and airily as it

reads, the author had struggled almost throughout with the pains of

cramp or the lassitude of opium. Calling on him one day to dun him for

copy, James Ballantyne found him with a clean pen and a blank sheet

before him, and uttered some rather solemn exclamation of surprise.

"Ay, ay, Jemmy," said he, "'tis easy for you to bid me get on, but how

the deuce can I make Rob Roy's wife speak, with such a _curmurring_ in

my guts?"

{p.202} CHAPTER XL.

Rob Roy Published. -- Negotiation Concerning the Second

Series of Tales of my Landlord. -- Commission to Search for

the Scottish Regalia. -- Letters to the Duke of Buccleuch,

Mr. Croker, Mr. Morritt, Mr. Murray, Mr. Maturin, etc. --

Correspondence on Rural Affairs with Mr. Laidlaw, and on the

Buildings at Abbotsford with Mr. Terry. -- Death Of Mrs.

Murray Keith and Mr. George Bullock.

1818.

Rob Roy and his wife, Bailie Nicol Jarvie and his housekeeper, Die

Vernon and Rashleigh Osbaldistone--these boldly drawn and happily

contrasted personages--were welcomed as warmly as the most fortunate

of their predecessors.[85] Constable's resolution to begin with an

{p.203} edition of 10,000 proved to have been as sagacious as brave;

for within a fortnight a second impression of 3000 was called for; and

the subsequent sale of this novel has considerably exceeded 40,000

more.

[Footnote 85: [On the 16th of February, Lady Louisa

Stuart wrote:--

"I have read _Rob Roy_ twice.... The scale with me would

be _Waverley_, _Old Mortality_, _Guy Mannering_--so far

I am sure. I am not sure which of the others I could

positively prefer; there are striking beauties in each.

In _Rob Roy_ the painting of character is as vivid as in

anything the author ever wrote. Rob himself, Die Vernon,

Nicol Jarvie, Andrew Fairservice, not to speak of the

Tory baronet and his cubs, or the Jesuit Rashleigh. The

beginning and end, I am afraid, I quarrel with; ... but

beginnings signify little; ends signify more. Now, I

fear the end of this is huddled, as if the author were

tired and wanted to get rid of his personages as fast as

he could, knocking them on the head without mercy. Die

Vernon has what a Lord Bellamont (famous in my day and

before it for profligacy and affectation) used to call

such 'a catastrophical countenance' that one cannot

reconcile oneself to her being married and settled like

her sober neighbors. It is almost as bad as if Flora

MacIvor had married the Colonel's nephew.... You see I

give my opinion (let it be worth something or nothing)

as if I were writing to a person not supposed to be in

any way sib to the mysterious Unknown; but it is because

I believe you have too distinguishing a taste to relish

all sugar and treacle. Goldsmith's metaphor was bad when

he said, 'Who peppers the highest is surest to please,'

for flattery resembles neither pepper nor salt. Apropos

of the mystery, those who see far into a millstone are

now sure that the _Tales of my Landlord_ were written by

a different person, and parts of them by different

hands. When they give their reasons with a complacent

delight in their own sagacity, I think to myself, how

often must I have talked as much wise nonsense upon

subjects which I knew nothing about."--_Familiar

Letters_, vol. ii. p. 11.]]

Scott, however, had not waited for this new burst of applause. As soon

as he came within view of the completion of Rob Roy, he desired John

Ballantyne to propose to Constable and Co. a second series of the

Tales of my Landlord, to be comprised, like the first, in four

volumes, and ready for publication by "the King's birthday;" that is,

the 4th of June, 1818. "I have hungered and thirsted," he wrote, "to

see the end of those shabby borrowings among friends; they have all

been wiped out except the good Duke's £4000--and I will not suffer

either new offers of land or anything else to come in the way of that

clearance. I expect that you will be able to arrange this resurrection

of Jedediah, so that £5000 shall be at my order."

Mr. Rigdum used to glory in recounting that he acquitted himself on

this occasion with a species of dexterity not contemplated in his

commission. He well knew how sorely Constable had been wounded by

seeing the first Tales of Jedediah published by Murray and

Blackwood--and that the utmost success of Rob Roy would only double

his anxiety to keep them out of the field, when the hint should be

dropt that a second MS. from Gandercleuch might shortly be looked for.

John therefore took a convenient opportunity to mention the new scheme

as if casually--so as to give Constable the impression {p.204} that

the author's purpose was to divide the second series also between his

old rival in Albemarle Street, of whom his jealousy was always

sensitive, and his neighbor Blackwood, whom, if there had been no

other grudge, the recent conduct and rapidly increasing sale of his

Magazine would have been sufficient to make Constable hate with a

perfect hatred. To see not only his old "Scots Magazine" eclipsed, but

the authority of the Edinburgh Review itself bearded on its own soil

by this juvenile upstart, was to him gall and wormwood; and, moreover,

he himself had come in for his share in some of those grotesque _jeux

d'esprit_ by which, at this period, Blackwood's young Tory wags

delighted to assail their elders and betters of the Whig persuasion.

To prevent the proprietor of this new journal from acquiring anything

like a hold on the author of Waverley, and thus competing with himself

not only in periodical literature, but in the highest of the time, was

an object for which, as John Ballantyne shrewdly guessed, Constable

would have made at that moment almost any sacrifice. When, therefore,

the haughty but trembling bookseller--"The Lord High Constable" (as he

had been dubbed by these jesters)--signified his earnest hope that the

second Tales of my Landlord were destined to come out under the same

auspices with Rob Roy, the plenipotentiary answered with an air of

deep regret, that he feared it would be impossible for the author to

dispose of the work--unless to publishers who should agree to take

with it _the whole_ of the remaining stock of "John Ballantyne and

Co.;" and Constable, pertinaciously as he had stood out against many

more modest propositions of this nature, was so worked upon by his

jealous feelings, that his resolution at once gave way. He agreed on

the instant to do all that John seemed to shrink from asking--and at

one sweep cleared the Augean stable in Hanover Street of unsalable

rubbish to the amount of £5270! I am assured by his surviving partner,

that when he had finally {p.205} redisposed of the stock, he found

himself a loser by fully two thirds of this sum.

Burthened with this heavy condition, the agreement for the sale of

10,000 copies of the embryo series was signed before the end of

November, 1817; and on the 7th January, 1818, Scott wrote as follows

to his noble friend:--

TO THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH, ETC., ETC.

MY DEAR LORD DUKE,--I have the great pleasure of enclosing

the discharged bond which your Grace stood engaged in for

me, and on my account. The accommodation was of the greatest

consequence to me, as it enabled me to retain possession of

some valuable literary property, which I must otherwise have

suffered to be sold at a time when the booksellers had no

money to buy it. My dear Lord, to wish that all your

numerous and extensive acts of kindness may be attended with

similar advantages to the persons whom you oblige, is

wishing you what to your mind will be the best recompense;

and to wish that they may be felt by all as gratefully as by

me, though you may be careless to hear about that part of

the story, is only wishing what is creditable to human

nature. I have this moment your more than kind letter, and

congratulate your Grace that, in one sense of the word, you

can be what you never will be in any other, _ambidexter_.

But I am sorry you took so much trouble, and I fear _pains_

besides, to display your new talent.

Ever your Grace's truly faithful,

Walter SCOTT.

The closing sentence of this letter refers to a fit of the gout which

had disabled the Duke's right hand, but not cooled his zeal on a

subject which, throughout January, 1818, occupied, I firmly believe,

much more of his correspondent's thoughts by day and dreams by night,

than any one, or perhaps than all others, besides. The time {p.206}

now approached when a Commission to examine the Crown-room in the

Castle of Edinburgh, which had sprung from one of Scott's

conversations with the Prince Regent in 1815, was at length to be

acted upon. The minstrel of the "Rough Clan" had taken care that the

name of his chief should stand at the head of the document; but the

Duke's now precarious health ultimately prevented him from being

present at the discovery of the long buried and almost forgotten

Regalia of Scotland. The two following letters on this subject are of

the same date--Edinburgh, 14th January, 1818.

TO THE DUKE OF BUCCLEUCH, ETC., ETC., BOWHILL.

MY DEAR LORD,--You will hear from the Advocate that the

Commission for opening the Regalia is arrived, and that the

Commissioners held their first meeting yesterday. They have

named next Wednesday (in case your Grace can attend) for

opening the mysterious chest. So this question will be put

to rest forever.

I remember among the rebel company which debauched my youth,

there was a drunken old Tory, who used to sing a ballad made

about these same Regalia at the time of the Union, in which

they were all destined to the basest uses; the crown, for

example,

"To make a can for Brandy Nan

To puke in when she's tipsy."

The rest of the song is in a tone of equally pure humor; the

chorus ran:--

"Farewell, thou ancient kingdom--

Farewell, thou ancient kingdom.

Who sold thyself for English pelf--

Was ever such a thing done?"

I hope your Grace feels yourself sufficiently interested in

the recovery of these ancient symbols of national

independence, so long worn by your forefathers, and which

were never profaned by the touch of a monarch of a foreign

{p.207} dynasty. Here is fine planting weather. I trust it

is as good in the Forest and on Tweedside.

Ever your Grace's truly faithful

Walter SCOTT.

TO J. B. S. MORRITT, ESQ., M. P., ROKEBY.

DEAR MORRITT,--Our fat friend has remembered a petition

which I put up to him, and has granted a Commission to the

Officers of State and others (my unworthy self

included)--which trusty and well-beloved persons are to

institute a search after the Regalia of Scotland. There has

an odd mystery hung about the fate of these royal symbols of

national independence. The spirit of the Scotch at the Union

clung fondly to these emblems; and to soothe their jealousy

it was specially provided by an article of the Union, that

the Regalia should never be removed, under any pretext, from

the kingdom of Scotland. Accordingly they were deposited,

with much ceremony, as an authentic instrument bears, in a

strong chest, secured by many locks, and the chest itself

placed in a strong room, which again was carefully bolted up

and secured, leaving to national pride the satisfaction of

pointing to the barred window, with the consciousness that

there lay the Regalia of Scotland. But this gratification

was strangely qualified by a surmise, which somehow became

generally averred, stating, that the Regalia had been sent

to London; and you may remember that we saw at the Jewel

Office a crown, _said to be_ the ancient Crown of Scotland.

If this transfer (by the way, highly illegal) was ever made,

it must have been under some secret warrant; for no

authority can be traced for such a proceeding in the records

of the Secretary of State's Office. Fifteen or twenty years

ago, the Crown-room, as it is called, was opened by certain

Commissioners, under authority of a sign-manual. They saw

the fatal chest, strewed with the dust of an hundred years,

about six inches thick: a coating of like thickness lay on

{p.208} the floor; and I have heard the late President

Blair say, that the uniform and level appearance of the dust

warranted them to believe that the chest, if opened at all

after 1707, must have been violated within a short time of

that date, since, had it been opened at a later period, the

dust accumulated on the lid, and displaced at opening it,

must have been lying around the chest. But the Commissioners

did not think their warrant entitled them to force this

chest, for which no keys could be found; especially as their

warrant only entitled them to search for _records_--not for

crowns and sceptres.

The mystery, therefore, remained unpenetrated; and public

curiosity was left to console itself with the nursery

rhyme:--

"On Tintock tap there is a mist,

And in the mist there is a kist."

Our fat friend's curiosity, however, goes to the point at

once, authorizing and enjoining an express search for the

Regalia. Our friend of Buccleuch is at the head of the

Commission, and will, I think, be as keen as I or any one,

to see the issue.

I trust you have read Rob by this time. I think he smells of

the cramp. Above all, I had too much flax on my distaff; and

as it did not consist with my patience or my plan to make a

fourth volume, I was obliged at last to draw a rough,

coarse, and hasty thread. But the book is well liked here,

and has reeled off in great style. I have two stories on the

anvil, far superior to Rob Roy in point of interest. Ever

yours,

Walter SCOTT.

The Commissioners, who finally assembled on the 4th of February, were,

according to the record, "the Right Hon. Charles Hope, Lord President

of the Court of Session; the Right Hon. David Boyle, Lord

Justice-Clerk; the Right Hon. William Adam, Lord Chief Commissioner of

the Jury Court; Major-General John Hope {p.209} (Commanding the

Forces in Scotland); the Solicitor-General (James Wedderburn, Esq.);

the Lord Provost of Edinburgh (Kincaid Mackenzie, Esq.); William

Clerk, Esq., Principal Clerk of the Jury Court; Henry Jardine, Esq.,

Deputy Remembrancer in the Exchequer; Thomas Thomson, Esq., Deputy

Clerk-Register of Scotland; and Walter Scott, Esq., one of the

Principal Clerks of Session."

Of the proceedings of this day, the reader has a full and particular

account in an Essay which Scott penned shortly afterwards, and which

is included in his Prose Miscellanies (vol. vii.). But I must not omit

the contemporaneous letters in which he announced the success of the

quest to his friend the Secretary of the Admiralty, and through him to

the Regent:--

TO J. W. CROKER, ESQ., M. P., ETC., ETC., ADMIRALTY, LONDON.

EDINBURGH, 4th February, 1818.

MY DEAR CROKER,--I have the pleasure to assure you the

Regalia of Scotland were this day found in perfect

preservation. The Sword of State and Sceptre showed marks of

hard usage at some former period; but in all respects agree

with the description in Thomson's work.[86] I will send you

a complete account of the opening to-morrow, as the official

account will take some time to draw up. In the mean time, I

hope you will remain as obstinate in your unbelief as St.

Thomas, because then you will come down to satisfy yourself.

I know nobody entitled to earlier information, save ONE, to

whom you can perhaps find the means of communicating the

result of our researches. The post is just going off.

Ever yours truly,

Walter SCOTT.

[Footnote 86: _Collection of Inventories and other

Records of the Royal Wardrobe and Jewel-House, etc._

Edin. 1815, 4to.]

{p.210} TO THE SAME.

EDINBURGH, 5th February, 1818.

MY DEAR CROKER,--I promised I would add something to my

report of yesterday, and yet I find I have but little to

say. The extreme solemnity of opening sealed doors of oak

and iron, and finally breaking open a chest which had been

shut since 7th March, 1707, about a hundred and eleven

years, gave a sort of interest to our researches, which I

can hardly express to you, and it would be very difficult to

describe the intense eagerness with which we watched the

rising of the lid of the chest, and the progress of the

workmen in breaking it open, which was neither an easy nor a

speedy task. It sounded very hollow when they worked on it

with their tools, and I began to lean to your faction of the

Little Faiths. However, I never could assign any probable or

feasible reason for withdrawing these memorials of ancient

independence; and my doubts rather arose from the conviction

that many absurd things are done in public as well as in

private life, merely out of a hasty impression of passion or

resentment. For it was evident the removal of the Regalia

might have greatly irritated people's minds here, and

offered a fair pretext of breaking the Union, which for

thirty years was the predominant wish of the Scottish

nation.

The discovery of the Regalia has interested people's minds

much more strongly than I expected, and is certainly

calculated to make a pleasant and favorable impression upon

them in respect to the kingly part of the constitution. It

would be of the utmost consequence that they should be

occasionally shown to them, under proper regulations, and

for a small fee. The Sword of State is a most beautiful

piece of workmanship, a present from Pope Julius II. to

James IV. The scabbard is richly decorated with filigree

work of silver, double gilded, representing oak leaves and

acorns, executed in {p.211} a taste worthy that classical

age in which the arts revived. A draughtsman has been

employed to make sketches of these articles, in order to be

laid before his Royal Highness. The fate of these Regalia,

which his Royal Highness's goodness has thus restored to

light and honor, has on one or two occasions been singular

enough. They were, in 1652, lodged in the Castle of

Dunnottar, the seat of the Earl Marischal, by whom,

according to his ancient privilege, they were kept. The

castle was defended by George Ogilvie of Barra, who,

apprehensive of the progress which the English made in

reducing the strong places in Scotland, became anxious for

the safety of these valuable memorials. The ingenuity of his

lady had them conveyed out of the castle in a bag on a

woman's back, among some _hards_, as they are called, of

lint. They were carried to the Kirk of Kinneff, and

entrusted to the care of the clergyman, named Grainger, and

his wife, and buried under the pulpit. The Castle of

Dunnottar, though very strong and faithfully defended, was

at length under necessity of surrendering, being the last

strong place in Britain on which the royal flag floated in

those calamitous times. Ogilvie and his lady were threatened

with the utmost extremities by the Republican General

Morgan, unless they should produce the Regalia. The governor

stuck to it that he knew nothing of them, as in fact they

had been carried away without his knowledge. The lady

maintained she had given them to John Keith, second son of

the Earl Marischal, by whom, she said, they had been carried

to France. They suffered a long imprisonment, and much ill

usage. On the Restoration, the old Countess Marischal,

founding upon the story Mrs. Ogilvie had told to screen her

husband, obtained for her own son, John Keith, the earldom

of Kintore, and the post of Knight Marischal, with £400 a

year, as if he had been in truth the preserver of the

Regalia. It soon proved that this reward had been too

hastily given, for Ogilvie of Barra {p.212} produced the

Regalia, the honest clergyman refusing to deliver them to

any one but those from whom he received them. Ogilvie was

made a Knight Baronet, however, and got a new charter of the

lands, acknowledging the good service. Thus it happened

oddly enough, that Keith, who was abroad during the

transaction, and had nothing to do with it, got the earldom,

pension, etc., Ogilvie only inferior honors, and the poor

clergyman nothing whatever, or, as we say, _the hare's foot

to lick_. As for Ogilvie's lady, she died before the

Restoration, her health being ruined by the hardships she

endured from the Cromwellian satellites. She was a Douglas,

with all the high spirit of that proud family. On her

deathbed, and not till then, she told her husband where the

honors were concealed, charging him to suffer death rather

than betray them. Popular tradition says, not very probably,

that Grainger and his wife were _booted_ (that is, tortured

with the engine called the boots). I think that the Knight

Marischal's office rested in the Kintore family until 1715,

when it was resumed on account of the bearded Earl's

accession to the Insurrection of that year. He escaped well,

for they might have taken his estate and his earldom. I must

save post, however, and conclude abruptly. Yours ever,

Walter SCOTT.

On the 5th, after the foregoing letter had been written at the Clerk's

table, Scott and several of his brother Commissioners revisited the

Castle, accompanied by some of the ladies of their families. His

daughter tells me that her father's conversation had worked her

feelings up to such a pitch, that when the lid was again removed, she

nearly fainted, and drew back from the circle. As she was retiring,

she was startled by his voice exclaiming, in a tone of the deepest

emotion, "something between anger and despair," as she expresses

it,--"By G----, No!" One of the Commissioners, not quite entering

{p.213} into the solemnity with which Scott regarded this business,

had, it seems, made a sort of motion as if he meant to put the crown

on the head of one of the young ladies near him, but the voice and

aspect of the Poet were more than sufficient to make the worthy

gentleman understand his error; and, respecting the enthusiasm with

which he had not been taught to sympathize, he laid down the ancient

diadem with an air of painful embarrassment. Scott whispered, "Pray,

forgive me;" and turning round at the moment, observed his daughter

deadly pale, and leaning by the door. He immediately drew her out of

the room, and when the air had somewhat recovered her, walked with her

across the Mound to Castle Street. "He never spoke all the way home,"

she says, "but every now and then I felt his arm tremble; and from

that time I fancied he began to treat me more like a woman than a

child. I thought he liked me better, too, than he had ever done

before."

These little incidents may give some notion of the profound

seriousness with which his imagination had invested this matter. I am

obliged to add, that in the society of Edinburgh at the time, even in

the highest Tory circles, it did not seem to awaken much even of

curiosity--to say nothing of any deeper feeling. There was, however, a

great excitement among the common people of the town, and a still

greater among the peasantry, not only in the neighborhood, but all

over Scotland; and the Crown-room, becoming thenceforth one of the

established _lions_ of a city much resorted to, moreover, by stranger

tourists, was likely, on the most moderate scale of admission-fee, to

supply a revenue sufficient for remunerating responsible and

respectable guardianship. This post would, as Scott thought, be a very

suitable one for his friend, Captain Adam Ferguson; and he exerted all

his zeal for that purpose. The Captain was appointed: his nomination,

however, did not take place for some months after; and the postscript

of a {p.214} letter to the Duke of Buccleuch, dated May 14, 1818,

plainly indicates the interest on which Scott mainly relied for its

completion: "If you happen," he writes, "to see Lord Melville, pray

give him a jog about Ferguson's affair; but between ourselves, I

depend chiefly on the kind offices of Willie Adam, who is an auld

sneck-drawer." The Lord Chief-Commissioner, at all times ready to lend

Scott his influence with the Royal Family, had, on the present

occasion, the additional motive of warm and hereditary personal regard

for Ferguson.

I have placed together such letters as referred principally to the

episode of the Regalia; but shall now give, in the order of time, a

few which will sufficiently illustrate the usual course of his

existence, while The Heart of Mid-Lothian was in progress. It appears

that he resumed, in the beginning of this year, his drama of

Devorgoil. His letters to Terry are of course full of that subject,

but they contain, at the same time, many curious indications of his

views and feelings as to theatrical affairs in general--and mixed up

with these a most characteristic record of the earnestness with which

he now watched the interior fitting up, as he had in the season before

the outward architecture, of the new edifice at Abbotsford. Meanwhile

it will be seen that he found leisure hours for various contributions

to periodical works,--among others, an article on Kirkton's Church

History, and another on (of all subjects in the world) _military

bridges_, for the Quarterly Review; a spirited version of the old

German ballad on the Battle of Sempach, and a generous criticism on

Mrs. Shelley's romance of Frankenstein, for Blackwood's Magazine. This

being the first winter and spring of Laidlaw's establishment at

Kaeside, communications as to the affairs of the farm were exchanged

weekly whenever Scott was in Edinburgh, and they afford delightful

evidence of that paternal solicitude for the well-being of his rural

dependents, which all along kept pace with Scott's zeal as to the

economical {p.215} improvement, and the picturesque adornment of his

territories.

TO D. TERRY, ESQ., LONDON.

EDINBURGH, 23d January, 1818.

MY DEAR TERRY,--You have by this time the continuation of

the drama, down to the commencement of the third act, as I

have your letter on the subject of the first. You will

understand that I only mean them as sketches; for the first

and second acts are too short, and both want much to combine

them with the third. I can easily add music to Miss

Devorgoil's part. As to Braham, he is a beast of an actor,

though an angel of a singer, and truly I do not see what he

could personify. Let me know, however, your thoughts and

wishes, and all shall be moulded to the best of my power to

meet them: the point is to make it _take_ if we can; the

rest is all leather and prunella. A great many things must

occur to you technically better, in the way of alteration

and improvement, and you know well that, though too indolent

to amend things on my own conviction, I am always ready to

make them meet my friends' wishes if possible. We shall both

wish it better than I can make it, but there is no reason

why we should not do for it all that we can. I advise you to

take some sapient friend into your counsels, and let me know

the result, returning the MS. at the same time.

I am now anxious to complete Abbotsford. I think I told you

I mean to do nothing whatever to the present house, but to

take it away altogether at some future time, so that I

finish the upper story without any communication with Mrs.

Redford's _ci-devant_ mansion, and shall place the opening

in the lower story, wherever it will be most suitable for

the new house, without regard to defacing the temporary

drawing-room. I am quite feverish about the armory. I have

two pretty complete suits of armor--one Indian one, and a

cuirassier's, with {p.216} boots, casque, etc.; many

helmets, corselets, and steel caps, swords and poniards

without end, and about a dozen of guns, ancient and modern.

I have besides two or three battle-axes and maces, pikes and

targets, a Highlander's accoutrement complete, a great

variety of branches of horns, pikes, bows and arrows, and

the clubs and creases of Indian tribes. Mr. Bullock promised

to give some hint about the fashion of disposing all these

matters; and now our spring is approaching, and I want but

my plans to get on. I have reason to be proud of the

finishing of my castle, for even of the tower, for which I

trembled, not a stone has been shaken by the late terrific

gale, which blew a roof clear off in the neighborhood. It

was lying in the road like a saddle, as Tom Purdie expressed

it. Neither has a slate been lifted, though about two yards

of slating were stripped from the stables in the haugh,

which you know were comparatively less exposed.

I am glad to hear of Mrs. Terry's improved health and good

prospects. As for young Master Mumblecrust, I have no doubt

he will be a credit to us all.

Yours ever truly,

W. SCOTT.

As the letters to Mr. Laidlaw did not travel by post, but in the

basket which had come laden with farm-produce for the use of the

family in Edinburgh, they have rarely any date but the day of the

week. This is, however, of no consequence.

TO MR. LAIDLAW, KAESIDE.

Wednesday. [January, 1818.]

DEAR WILLIE,--Should the weather be rough, and you

nevertheless obliged to come to town, do not think of

riding, but take the Blucher.[87] Remember, your health is

of consequence to your family. Pray talk generally with the

notables of Darnick--I mean Rutherford, {p.217} and so

forth--concerning the best ordering of the road to the

marle; and also of the foot-road. It appears to me some

route might be found more convenient than the present, but

that which is most agreeable to those interested shall also

be most agreeable for me. As a patriotic member of the

community of Darnick, I consider their rights equally

important as my own.

[Footnote 87: A stage-coach, so called, which ran

betwixt Edinburgh and Jedburgh.]

I told you I should like to convert the present steading at

Beechland into a little hamlet of laborers, which we will

name Abbotstown. The art of making people happy is to leave

them much to their own guidance, but some little regulation

is necessary. In the first place, I should like to have

active and decent people there; then it is to be considered

on what footing they should be. I conceive the best possible

is, that they should pay for their cottages, and cow-grass,

and potato ground, and be paid for their labor at the

ordinary rate. I would give them some advantages sufficient

to balance the following conditions, which, after all, are

conditions in my favor: _1st_, That they shall keep their

cottages and little gardens, and doors, tolerably neat; and

_2d_, That the men shall on no account shoot, or the boys

break timber or take birds' nests, or go among the planting.

I do not know any other restrictions, and these are easy. I

should think we might settle a few families very happily

here, which is an object I have much at heart, for I have no

notion of the proprietor who is only ambitious to be lord of

the "beast and the brute," and chases the human face from

his vicinity. By the bye, could we not manage to have a

piper among the colonists?

We are delighted to hear that your little folks like the

dells. Pray, in your walks try to ascertain the locality of

St. John's Well, which cures the botts, and which John Moss

claims for Kaeside; also the true history of the Carline's

Hole. Ever most truly yours,

W. SCOTT.

{p.218} I hope Mrs. Laidlaw does not want for anything that she can

get from the garden or elsewhere.

TO DANIEL TERRY, ESQ.

8th February, 1818.

MY DEAR TERRY,--Yours arrived, unluckily, just half an hour

after my packet was in the post-office, so this will cost

you 9_d._, for which I grieve. To answer your principal

question first,--the drama is

"Yours, Terry, yours in every thought."

I should never have dreamed of making such an attempt in my

own proper person; and if I had such a vision, I should have

been anxious to have made it something of a legitimate

drama, such as a literary man, uncalled upon by any

circumstance to connect himself with the stage, might have

been expected to produce. Now this is just what any

gentleman in your situation might run off, to give a little

novelty to the entertainment of the year, and as such will

meet a mitigated degree of criticism, and have a better

chance of that _productive_ success, which is my principal

object in my godson's behalf. If any time should come when

you might wish to disclose the secret, it will be in your

power, and our correspondence will always serve to show that

it was only at my earnest request, annexed as the condition

of bringing the play forward, that you gave it your name--a

circumstance which, with all the attending particulars, will

prove plainly that there was no assumption on your part.

A beautiful drama might be made on the concealment of the

Scotch Regalia during the troubles. But it would interfere

with the democratic spirit of the times, and would probably

---- "By party rage,

Or right or wrong, be hooted from the stage."

{p.219} I will never forgive you if you let any false idea

of my authorial feelings prevent your acting in this affair

as if you were the real parent, not the godfather of the

piece. Our facetious friend J. B. knows nought of such a

matter being _en train_, and never will know. I am delighted

to hear my windows are finished. Yours very truly,

Walter SCOTT.

[Footnote 88: Slightly altered from Dr. Johnson's

Prologue to the comedy of _A Word to the Wise_.]

TO MR. LAIDLAW, KAESIDE.

Wednesday. [February, 1818.]

DEAR WILLIE,--I am not desirous to buy more land at present,

unless I were to deal with Mr. Rutherford or Heiton, and I

would rather deal with them next year than this, when I

would have all my payments made for what I am now buying.

Three or four such years as the last would enable me with

prudence and propriety to ask Nicol[89] himself to flit and

remove.

[Footnote 89: Mr. Nicol Milne of Faldonside. This

gentleman's property is a valuable and extensive one,

situated immediately to the westward of Abbotsford; and

Scott continued, year after year, to dream of adding it

also to his own.]

I like the idea of the birch-hedge much, and if intermixed

with holly and thorns, I think it might make an impenetrable

thicket, having all the advantages of a hedge without the

formality. I fancy you will also need a great number of

(black) Italian poplars--which are among the most useful and

best growers, as well as most beautiful of plants which love

a wet soil.

I am glad the saws are going.[90] We may begin by and by

with wrights, but I cannot but think that a handy laborer

might be taught to work at them. I shall insist on Tom

learning the process perfectly himself.

[Footnote 90: A sawmill had just been erected at

Toftfield.]

As to the darkness of the garrets, they are intended for the

accommodation of travelling geniuses, poets, painters, and

so forth, and a little obscurity will refresh their

shattered brains. I dare say Lauchie[91] will _shave_

{p.220} his knoll, if it is required--it may to the

barber's with the Laird's hebdomadal beard--and Packwood

would have thought it the easier job of the two.

[Footnote 91: A cocklaird adjoining Abbotsford at the

eastern side. His farm is properly _Lochbreist_; but in

the neighborhood he was generally known as _Laird

Lauchie_--or _Lauchie Langlegs_. Washington Irving

describes him in his _Abbotsford_, with high gusto. He

was a most absurd original.]

I saw Blackwood yesterday, and Hogg the day before, and I

understand from them you think of resigning the Chronicle

department of the Magazine. Blackwood told me that if you

did not like that part of the duty, he would consider

himself accountable for the same sum he had specified to you

for any other articles you might communicate from time to

time. He proposes that Hogg should do the Chronicle: He will

not do it so well as you, for he wants judgment and caution,

and likes to have the appearance of eccentricity where

eccentricity is least graceful; that, however, is

Blackwood's affair. If you really do not like the Chronicle,

there can be no harm in your giving it up. What strikes me

is, that there is a something certain in having such a

department to conduct, whereas you may sometimes find

yourself at a loss when you have to cast about for a subject

every month. Blackwood _is_ rather in a bad pickle just

now--sent to Coventry by the trade, as the booksellers call

themselves, and all about the parody of the two beasts.[92]

{p.221} Surely these gentlemen think themselves rather

formed of porcelain clay than of common potter's ware.

Dealing in satire against all others, their own dignity

suffers so cruelly from an ill-imagined joke! If B. had good

books to sell, he might set them all at defiance. His

Magazine does well, and beats Constable's: but we will talk

of this when we meet.[93]

[Footnote 92: An article in one of the early numbers of

_Blackwood's Magazine_, entitled _The Chaldee MS._, in

which the literati and booksellers of Edinburgh were

quizzed _en masse_--Scott himself among the rest. It was

in this lampoon that Constable first saw himself

designated in print by the _sobriquet_ of "The Crafty,"

long before bestowed on him by one of his own most

eminent Whig supporters; but nothing nettled him so much

as the passages in which he and Blackwood are

represented entreating the support of Scott for their

respective Magazines, and waved off by "the Great

Magician" in the same identical phrases of contemptuous

indifference. The description of Constable's visit to

Abbotsford may be worth transcribing--for Sir David

Wilkie, who was present when Scott read it, says he was

almost choked with laughter, and he afterwards confessed

that the Chaldean author had given a sufficiently

accurate version of what really passed on the

occasion:--

"26. But when the Spirits were gone, he (The Crafty)

said unto himself, I will arise and go unto a magician,

which is of my friends: of a surety he will devise some

remedy, and free me out of all my distresses.

"27. So he arose and came unto that great magician which

hath his dwelling in the old fastness, hard by the River

Jordan, which is by the Border.

"28. And the magician opened his mouth and said, Lo! my

heart wisheth thy good, and let the thing prosper which

is in thy hands to do it.

"29. But thou seest that my hands are full of working,

and my labor is great. For, lo, I have to feed all the

people of my land, and none knoweth whence his food

cometh; but each man openeth his mouth, and my hand

filleth it with pleasant things.

"30. Moreover, thine adversary also is of my familiars.

"31. The land is before thee: draw thou up thine hosts

for the battle on the mount of Proclamation, and defy

boldly thine enemy, which hath his camp in the place of

Princes; quit ye as men, and let favor be shown unto him

which is most valiant.

"32. Yet be thou silent; peradventure will I help thee

some little.

"33. But the man which is Crafty saw that the magician

loved him not. For he knew him of old, and they had had

many dealings; and he perceived that he would not assist

him in the day of his adversity.

"34. So he turned about, and went out of his fastness.

And he shook the dust from his feet, and said, Behold I

have given this magician much money, yet see now, he

hath utterly deserted me. Verily, my fine gold hath

perished."--Chap. iii.]

[Footnote 93: [The story of the composition of _The

Chaldee Manuscript_, its publication in the first number

of the magazine, destined to so long and brilliant a

career, and the extraordinary commotion caused thereby,

is admirably told in the _Annals of a Publishing House_,

which also gives the details regarding Laidlaw's brief

connection with the new periodical, and the

correspondence of Scott and Blackwood during its early

months.--See Mrs. Oliphant's _William Blackwood and His

Sons_, vol. i. chap, iii.]]

As for Whiggery in general, I can only say, that as no man

can be said to be utterly overset until his rump has been

higher than his head, so I cannot read in history of any

free state which has been brought to slavery until the

rascal and uninstructed populace had had their short hour of

anarchical government, which naturally {p.222} leads to the

stern repose of military despotism. Property, morals,

education, are the proper qualifications for those who

should hold political rights, and extending them very widely

greatly lessens the chance of these qualifications being

found in electors. Look at the sort of persons chosen at

elections where the franchise is very general, and you will

find either fools who are content to flatter the passions of

the mob for a little transient popularity, or knaves who

pander to their follies, that they may make their necks a

footstool for their own promotion. With these convictions, I

am very jealous of Whiggery, under all modifications; and I

must say, my acquaintance with the total want of principle

in some of its warmest professors does not tend to recommend

it. Somewhat too much of this. My compliments to the

goodwife. Yours truly,

Walter SCOTT.

TO THE SAME.

Wednesday. [February, 1818.]

DEAR WILLIE,--I have no idea Usher[94] will take the

sheepland again, nor would I press it on him. As my

circumstances stand, immediate revenue is much less my

object than the real improvement of this property, which

amuses me besides; our wants are amply supplied by my £1600

a year official income: nor have we a wish or a motive to

extend our expenses beyond that of the decencies and

hospitality of our station in life; so that my other

resources remain for buying land in future, or improving

what we have. No doubt Abbotsford, in maintaining our

establishment during the summer, may be reckoned £150 or

£200 saved on what we must otherwise buy; and if we could

arrange to have mutton and beef {p.223} occasionally from

the farm in winter, it would be a still greater saving. All

this you will consider: for Tom, thoroughly honest and very

clever in his way, has no kind of generalizing, and would

often like to save sixpence in his own department at the

expense of my paying five shillings in another. This is his

fault, and when you join to it a Scotch slovenliness which

leads him to see things half-finished without pain or

anxiety, I do not know any other he has--but such as they

are, these must be guarded against. For our housemaid (for

housekeeper we must not call her), I should like much a hawk

of a nest so good as that you mention: but would not such a

place be rather beneath her views? Her duty would be to look

to scrupulous cleanliness within doors, and employ her

leisure in spinning, or plain-work, as wanted. When we came

out for a blink, she would be expected to cook a little in a

plain way, and play maid of all work; when we were

stationary, she would assist the housemaid and superintend

the laundry. Probably your aunt's granddaughter will have

pretensions to something better than this; but as we are to

be out on the 12th March, we will talk it over. Assuredly a

well-connected steady person would be of the greatest

consequence to us. I like your plan of pitting much; and to

compromise betwixt you and Tom, do one half with superior

attention, and slit in the others for mere nurses. But I am

no friend to that same slitting.

[Footnote 94: John Usher, the ex-proprietor of

Toftfield, was eventually Scott's tenant on part of

those lands for many years. He was a man of far superior

rank and intelligence to the rest of the displaced

lairds--and came presently to be one of Scott's trusty

rural friends, and a frequent companion of his sports.]

I adhere to trying a patch or two of larches, of a quarter

of an acre each, upon the Athole plan, by way of experiment.

We can plant them up if they do not thrive. On the whole,

three-and-a-half feet is, I think, the right distance. I

have no fear of the ground being impoverished. Trees are not

like arable crops, which necessarily derive their sustenance

from the superficial earth--the roots of trees go far and

wide, and, if incommoded by a neighbor, they send out

suckers to procure nourishment elsewhere. They never hurt

each other till {p.224} their tops interfere, which may be

easily prevented by timely weeding.

I rejoice in the sawmill. Have you settled with Harper?--and

how do Og and Bashan[95] come on? I cannot tell you how

delighted I am with the account Hogg gives me of Mr. Grieve.

The great Cameron was chaplain in the house of my great

something grandfather, and so I hope Mr. Grieve will be

mine. If, as the King of Prussia said to Rousseau, "a little

persecution is necessary to make his home entirely to his

mind," he shall have it; and what persecutors seldom

promise, I will stop whenever he is tired of it. I have a

pair of thumbikins also much at his service, if he requires

their assistance to glorify God and the Covenant. Sincerely,

I like enthusiasm of every kind so well, especially when

united with worth of character, that I shall be delighted

with this old gentleman. Ever yours,

W. SCOTT.

[Footnote 95: A yoke of oxen.]

The last paragraph of this letter refers to an uncle of Laidlaw's (the

father of Hogg's friend, John Grieve), who at this time thought of

occupying a cottage on Scott's estate. He was a preacher of the

Cameronian sect, and had long ministered to a very small remnant of

"the hill-folk" scattered among the wilds of Ettrick. He was a very

good man, and had a most venerable and apostolical benignity of

aspect; but his prejudices were as extravagant as those of Cameron,

his patriarch, himself could have been. The project of his removal to

Tweedside was never realized.

The following admirable letter was written at the request of Messrs.

Constable, who had, on Scott's recommendation, undertaken the

publication of Mr. Maturin's novel, Women, or _Pour et Contre_. The

reverend author's Bertram had, it may be remembered, undergone some

rather rough usage in Coleridge's Biographia Literaria; {p.225} and

he was now desirous to revenge himself by a preface of the polemical

sort:--

TO THE REV. C. R. MATURIN, DUBLIN.

26th February, 1818.

DEAR SIR,--I am going to claim the utmost and best privilege

of sincere friendship and good-will, that of offering a few

words of well-meant advice; and you may be sure that the

occasion seems important to induce me to venture so far upon

your tolerance. It respects the preface to your work, which

Constable and Co. have sent to me. It is as well written as

that sort of thing can be; but will you forgive me if I

say--it is too much in the tone of the offence which gave

rise to it, to be agreeable either to good taste or to

general feeling. Coleridge's work has been little read or

heard of, and has made no general impression

whatever--certainly no impression unfavorable to you or your

play. In the opinion, therefore, of many, you will be

resenting an injury of which they are unacquainted with the

existence. If I see a man beating another unmercifully, I am

apt to condemn him upon the first blush of the business, and

hardly excuse him though I may afterwards learn he had ample

provocation. Besides, your diatribe is not _hujus loci_. We

take up a novel for amusement, and this current of

controversy breaks out upon us like a stream of lava out of

the side of a beautiful green hill; men will say you should

have reserved your disputes for reviews or periodical

publications, and they will sympathize less with your anger,

because they will not think the time proper for expressing

it. We are bad judges, bad physicians, and bad divines in

our own case; but, above all, we are seldom able, when

injured or insulted, to judge of the degree of sympathy

which the world will bear in our resentment and our

retaliation. The instant, however, that such degree of

sympathy is exceeded, we hurt ourselves, and not our

adversary. I am so convinced {p.226} of this, and so deeply

fixed in the opinion, that besides the uncomfortable

feelings which are generated in the course of literary

debate, a man lowers his estimation in the public eye by

engaging in such controversy, that, since I have been dipped

in ink, I have suffered no personal attacks (and I have been

honored with them of all descriptions) to provoke me to

reply. A man will certainly be vexed on such occasions, and

I have wished to have the knaves _where the muircock was the

bailie_--or, as _you_ would say, _upon the sod_--but I never

let the thing cling to my mind, and always adhered to my

resolution, that if my writings and tenor of life did not

confute such attacks, my words never should. Let me entreat

you to view Coleridge's violence as a thing to be contemned,

not retaliated--the opinion of a British public may surely

be set in honest opposition to that of one disappointed and

wayward man. You should also consider, _en bon Chrétien_,

that Coleridge has had some room to be spited at the world,

and you are, I trust, to continue to be a favorite with the

public--so that you should totally neglect and despise

criticism, however virulent, which arises out of his bad

fortune and your good.

I have only to add that Messrs. Constable and Co. are

seriously alarmed for the effects of the preface upon the

public mind as unfavorable to the work. In this they must be

tolerable judges, for their experience as to popular feeling

is very great; and as they have met your wishes, in all the

course of the transaction, perhaps you will be disposed to

give some weight to their opinion upon a point like this.

Upon my own part I can only say that I have no habits of

friendship, and scarce those of acquaintance with

Coleridge--I have not even read his Autobiography--but I

consider him as a man of genius, struggling with bad habits

and difficult circumstances. It is, however, entirely upon

your account that I take the liberty of stating an opinion

on a subject of such delicacy. I should wish you to give

your excellent {p.227} talents fair play, and to ride this

race without carrying any superfluous weight; and I am so

well acquainted with my old friend the public, that I could

bet a thousand pounds to a shilling, that the preface (if

that controversial part of it is not cancelled) will greatly

prejudice your novel.

I will not ask your forgiveness for the freedom I have used,

for I am sure you will not suspect me of any motives but

those which arise from regard to your talents and person;

but I shall be glad to hear (whether you follow my advice or

no) that you are not angry with me for having volunteered to

offer it.

My health is, I think, greatly improved; I have had some

returns of my spasmodic affection, but tolerable in degree,

and yielding to medicine. I hope gentle exercise and the air

of my hills will set me up this summer. I trust you will

soon be out now. I have delayed reading the sheets in

progress after Vol. I., that I might enjoy them when

collected. Ever yours, etc.,

Walter SCOTT.

TO MR. LAIDLAW.

EDINBURGH, Wednesday. [March, 1818.]

DEAR WILLIE,--I am delighted to hear the plantings get on so

well. The weather here has been cruelly changeable--fresh

one day--frost the next--snow the third. This morning the

snow lay three inches thick, and before noon it was gone,

and blowing a tempest. Many of the better ranks are ill of

the typhus fever, and some deaths. How do your poor folks

come on? Let Tom advance you money when it is wanted. I do

not propose, like the heroine of a novel, to convert the

hovels of want into the abodes of elegant plenty, but we

have enough to spare to relieve actual distress, and do not

wish to economize where we can find out (which is difficult)

where the assistance is instantly useful.

Don't let Tom forget hedgerow trees, which he is very

{p.228} unwilling to remember; and also to plant birches,

oaks, elms, and such like round-headed trees along the

verges of the Kaeside plantations; they make a beautiful

outline, and also a sort of fence, and were not planted last

year because the earth at the sunk fences was too newly

travelled. This should be mixed with various bushes, as

hollies, thorns, so as to make a wild hedge, or thickety

obstruction to the inroads of cattle. A few sweetbriers,

alders, honeysuckles, laburnums, etc., should be thrown in.

A verdant screen may be made in this way, of the wildest and

most beautiful description, which should never be clipt,

only pruned, allowing the loose branches to drop over those

that are taken away. Tom is very costive about trees, and

talks only of 300 poplars. I shall send at least double that

number; also some hagberries, etc. He thinks he is saving me

money when he is starving my projects; but he is a pearl of

honesty and good intention, and I like him the better for

needing driving where expense is likely. Ever yours,

W. SCOTT.

TO JOHN MURRAY, ESQ., ALBEMARLE STREET, LONDON.

ABBOTSFORD, 23d March, 1818.

DEAR MURRAY,--

"Grieve not for me, my dearest dear,

I am not dead but sleepeth here."--

I have little to plead for myself, but the old and vile

apologies of laziness and indisposition. I think I have been

so unlucky of late as to have always the will to work when

sitting at the desk hurts me, and the irresistible

propensity to be lazy, when I might, like the man whom

Hogarth introduces into Bridewell with his hands strapped up

against the wall, "better work than stand thus." I laid

Kirkton[96] aside half finished, from a desire {p.229} to

get the original edition of the lives of Cameron, etc., by

Patrick Walker, which I had not seen since a boy, and now I

have got it, and find, as I suspected, that some curious

_morceaux_ have been cut out by subsequent editors.[97] I

will, without loss of time, finish the article, which I

think you will like. Blackwood kidnapped an article for his

Magazine on the Frankenstein story,[98] which I intended for

you. A very old friend and school companion of mine, and a

gallant soldier, if ever there was one, Sir Howard Douglas,

has asked me to review his work on Military Bridges. I must

get a friend's assistance for the scientific part, and add

some balaam of mine own (as printers' devils say) to make up

four or five pages. I have no objection to attempt Lord

Orford if I have time, and find I can do it with ease.

Though far from admiring his character, I have always had a

high opinion of his talents, and am well acquainted with his

works. The letters you have published are, I think, his very

best--lively, entertaining, and unaffected.[99] I am greatly

obliged to you for these and other literary treasures which

I owe to your goodness from time to time. Although not

thankfully acknowledged as they should be in course, these

things are never thanklessly received.

[Footnote 96: Scott's article on Kirkton's _History of

the Church of Scotland_, edited by Mr. C. K. Sharpe,

appeared in the 36th number of the _Quarterly

Review_,--See _Miscellaneous Prose Works_, vol. xix. p.

213.]

[Footnote 97: Scott expressed great satisfaction on

seeing the _Lives of the Covenanters_--Cameron, Peden,

Semple, Wellwood, Cargill, Smith, Renwick,

etc.--reprinted without mutilation in the _Biographia

Presbyteriana_. Edin. 1827. The publisher of this

collection was the late Mr. John Stevenson, long chief

clerk to John Ballantyne, and usually styled by Scott

"True Jock," in opposition to one of his old master's

many _aliases_--namely, "Leein' Johnnie."]

[Footnote 98: See Scott's _Prose Miscellanies_, vol.

xviii. p. 250.]

[Footnote 99: The Letters of Horace Walpole to George

Montagu.]

I could have sworn that Beppo was founded on Whistlecraft,

as both were on Anthony Hall,[100] who, like Beppo, had more

wit than grace.

[Footnote 100: _Anthony Hall_ is only known as Editor of

one of Leland's works. I have no doubt Scott was

thinking of _John Hall Stevenson_, author of _Crazy

Tales_; the friend, and (it is said) the _Eugenius_ of

Sterne.]

{p.230} I am not, however, in spirits at present for

treating either these worthies, or my friend Rose,[101]

though few have warmer wishes to any of the trio. But this

confounded changeable weather has twice within this

fortnight brought back my cramp in the stomach. Adieu. My

next shall be with a packet.--Yours truly,

W. SCOTT.

[Footnote 101: I believe Mr. Rose's _Court and

Parliament of Beasts_ is here alluded to.]

In the next letter we have Scott's lamentation over the death of Mrs.

Murray Keith--the Mrs. Bethune Baliol of his Chronicles of the

Canongate. The person alluded to under the designation of "Prince of

the Black Marble Islands" was Mr. George Bullock, already often

mentioned as, with Terry and Mr. Atkinson, consulted about all the

arrangements of the rising house at Abbotsford. Scott gave him this

title from the Arabian Nights, on occasion of his becoming the lessee

of some marble quarries in the Isle of Anglesea.

TO D. TERRY, ESQ., LONDON.

April 30, 1818--SELKIRK.

MY DEAR TERRY,--Your packet arrived this morning. I was much

disappointed not to find the Prince of the Black Islands'

plan in it, nor have I heard a word from him since anent it,

or anent the still more essential articles of doors and

windows. I heard from Hector Macdonald Buchanan, that the

said doors and windows were packing a fortnight since, but

there are no news of them. Surely our friend's heart has

grown as hard as his materials; or the spell of the

enchantress, which confined itself to the extremities of his

predecessor, has extended over his whole person. Mr.

Atkinson has kept tryst charmingly, and the ceiling of the

dining-room will be superb. I have got I know not how many

casts, from Melrose and other places, of pure Gothic

antiquity. I {p.231} must leave this on the 12th, and I

could bet a trifle the doors, etc., will arrive the very day

I set out, and be all put up _à la bonne aventure_. Meantime

I am keeping open house, not much to my convenience, and I

am afraid I shall be stopped in my plastering by the want of

these matters. The exposed state of my house has led to a

mysterious disturbance. The night before last we were awaked

by a violent noise, like drawing heavy boards along the new

part of the house. I fancied something had fallen, and

thought no more about it. This was about _two_ in the

morning. Last night, at the same witching hour, the very

same noise occurred. Mrs. S., as you know, is rather

_timbersome_, so up got I, with Beardie's broadsword under

my arm,

"So bolt upright,

And ready to fight."

But nothing was out of order, neither can I discover what

occasioned the disturbance. However, I went to bed,

grumbling against Tenterden Street,[102] and all its works.

If there was no entrance but the keyhole, I should warrant

myself against the ghosts. We have a set of idle fellows

called workmen about us, which is a better way of accounting

for nocturnal noises than any that is to be found in Baxter

or Glanville.

[Footnote 102: Bullock's manufactory was in this

street.]

When you see Mr. Atkinson, will you ask him how far he is

satisfied with the arch between the armory and the

ante-room, and whether it pleases him as it now stands? I

have a brave old oaken cabinet, as black as ebony, 300 years

old at least, which will occupy one side of the ante-room

for the present. It is seven feet and a half long, about

eighteen inches deep, and upwards of six feet high--a fine

stand for china, etc.

You will be sorry to hear that we have lost our excellent

old friend, Mrs. Murray Keith. She enjoyed all her spirits

and excellent faculties till within two days of her death,

when she was seized with a feverish complaint, {p.232}

which eighty-two years were not calculated to resist. Much

tradition, and of the very best kind, has died with this

excellent old lady; one of the few persons whose spirits and

cleanliness, and freshness of mind and body, made old age

lovely and desirable. In the general case, it seems scarce

endurable.

It seems odd to me that Rob Roy[103] should have made good

fortune; pray let me know something of its history. There is

in Jedediah's present work a thing capable of being woven

out a _bourgeoise_ tragedy. I think of contriving that it

shall be in your hands some time before the public see it,

that you may try to operate upon it yourself. This would not

be difficult, as vol. 4, and part of 3d, contain a different

story. _Avowedly_ I will never write for the stage; if I do,

"call me _horse_." And indeed I feel severely the want of

knowledge of theatrical business and effect: however,

something we will do. I am writing in the noise and babble

of a head-court of freeholders; therefore my letter is

incoherent, and therefore it is written also on long paper;

but therefore, moreover, it will move by frank, as the

member is here, and stands upon his popularity. Kind

compliments to Mrs. Terry and Walter.

Yours very truly,

Walter SCOTT.

[Footnote 103: A drama founded on the novel of _Rob Roy_

had been produced, with great success, on the London

stage.]

On the morning that Mr. Terry received the foregoing letter in London,

Mr. William Erskine was breakfasting with him; and the chief subject

of their conversation was the sudden death of George Bullock, which

had occurred on the same night, and, as nearly as they could

ascertain, at the very hour when Scott was roused from his sleep by

the "mysterious disturbance" here described, and sallied from his

chamber with old Beardie's Killiecrankie claymore in his hand. This

coincidence, when {p.233} Scott received Erskine's minute detail of

what had happened in Tenterden Street, made a much stronger impression

on his mind than might be gathered from the tone of an ensuing

communication.

TO D. TERRY, ESQ., LONDON.

ABBOTSFORD, 4th May, 1818.

DEAR TERRY,--I received with the greatest surprise, and the

most sincere distress, the news of poor George Bullock's

death. In the full career of honorable

industry,--distinguished by his uncommon taste and

talent,--esteemed by all who transacted business with

him,--and loved by those who had the pleasure of his more

intimate acquaintance,--I can scarce conceive a more

melancholy summons. It comes as a particular shock to me,

because I had, particularly of late, so much associated his

idea with the improvements here, in which his kind and

enthusiastic temper led him to take such interest; and in

looking at every unfinished or projected circumstance, I

feel an impression of melancholy which will for some time

take away the pleasure I have found in them. I liked George

Bullock because he had no trumpery selfishness about his

heart, taste, or feelings. Pray let me know about the

circumstances of his family, etc. I feel most sincerely

interested in all that concerns him. It must have been a

dreadful surprise to Mr. Atkinson and you who lived with him

so much. I need not, I am sure, beg you to be in no hurry

about my things. The confusion must be cruelly great,

without any friend adding to it; and in fact, at this

moment, I am very indifferent on the subject. The poor kind

fellow! He took so much notice of little Charles, and was so

domesticated with us all, that I really looked with a

schoolboy's anxiety for his being here in the season, to

take his own quiet pleasures, and to forward mine. But God's

will be done. All that surviving friends can do upon such a

loss is, if possible, to love each other still better.--I

{p.234} beg to be kindly remembered to Mrs. Terry and

Monsieur Walter. Ever most truly yours,

Walter SCOTT.

TO THE SAME.

EDINBURGH, 16th May, 1818.

MY DEAR TERRY,--Mr. Nasmyth[104] has obligingly given me an

opportunity of writing to you a few lines, as he is setting

out for London. I cannot tell you how much I continue to be

grieved for our kind-hearted and enthusiastic friend

Bullock. I trust he has left his family comfortably settled,

though, with so many plans which required his active and

intelligent mind to carry them through, one has natural

apprehensions upon that score. When you can with propriety

make inquiry how my matters stand, I should be glad to know.

Hector Macdonald tells me that my doors and windows were

ready packed, in which case, perhaps, the sooner they are

embarked the better, not only for safety, but because they

can only be in the way, and the money will now be the more

acceptable. Poor Bullock had also the measures for my

chimney-pieces, for grates of different kinds, and orders

for beds, dining-room tables and chairs. But how far these

are in progress of being executed, or whether they can now

be executed, I must leave to your judgment and inquiry. Your

good sense and delicacy will understand the _façon de faire_

better than I can point it out. I shall never have the

pleasure in these things that I expected.

[Footnote 104: Mr. Alexander Nasmyth, an eminent

landscape painter of Edinburgh--the father of Mrs.

Terry.]

I have just left Abbotsford to attend the Summer

session--left it when the leaves were coming out--the most

delightful season for a worshipper of the country like me.

The Home-bank, which we saw at first green with turnips,

will now hide a man somewhat taller than Johnny Ballantyne

in its shades. In fact, the trees {p.235} cover the ground,

and have a very pretty bosky effect; from six years to ten

or twelve, I think wood is as beautiful as ever it is

afterwards until it figures as aged and magnificent. Your

hobbledehoy tree of twenty-five years' standing is neither

so beautiful as in its infancy, nor so respectable as in its

age.

Counsellor Erskine is returned, much pleased with your

hospitality, and giving an excellent account of you. Were

you not struck with the fantastical coincidence of our

nocturnal disturbances at Abbotsford with the melancholy

event that followed? I protest to you the noise resembled

half-a-dozen men hard at work putting up boards and

furniture, and nothing can be more certain than that there

was nobody on the premises at the time. With a few

additional touches, the story would figure in Glanville or

Aubrey's Collection. In the mean time you may set it down

with poor Dubisson's warnings,[105] as a remarkable

coincidence coming under your own observation. I trust we

shall see you this season. I think we could hammer a neat

_comédie bourgeoise_ out of The Heart of Mid-Lothian. Mrs.

Scott and family join in kind compliments to Mrs. Terry; and

I am ever yours truly,

Walter SCOTT.

[Footnote 105: See _ante_, vol. iii. p. 220.]

It appears from one of these letters to Terry, that, so late as the

30th of April, Scott still designed to include two separate stories in

the second series of the Tales of my Landlord. But he must have

changed his plan soon after that date; since the four volumes,

entirely occupied with The Heart of Mid-Lothian, were before the

public in the course of June. The story thus deferred, in consequence

of the extent to which that of Jeanie Deans grew on his hands, was The

Bride of Lammermoor.

{p.236} CHAPTER XLI.

Dinner at Mr. Home Drummond's. -- Scott's Edinburgh Den. --

Details of his Domestic Life in Castle Street. -- His Sunday

Dinners. -- His Evening Drives, etc. -- His Conduct in the

General Society of Edinburgh. -- Dinners at John

Ballantyne's Villa, and at James Ballantyne's in St. John

Street, on the Appearance of a New Novel. -- Anecdotes of

the Ballantynes, and of Constable.

1818.

On the 12th of May, as we have seen, Scott left Abbotsford, for the

summer session in Edinburgh.

At this moment, his position, take it for all in all, was, I am

inclined to believe, what no other man had ever won for himself by the

pen alone. His works were the daily food, not only of his countrymen,

but of all educated Europe. His society was courted by whatever

England could show of eminence. Station, power, wealth, beauty, and

genius, strove with each other in every demonstration of respect and

worship--and, a few political fanatics and envious poetasters

apart--wherever he appeared in town or in country, whoever had Scotch

blood in him, "gentle or simple," felt it move more rapidly through

his veins when he was in the presence of Scott. To descend to what

many looked on as higher things, he considered himself, and was

considered by all about him, as rapidly consolidating a large fortune:

the annual profits of his novels alone had, for several years, been

not less than £10,000: his domains {p.237} were daily increased--his

castle was rising--and perhaps few doubted that erelong he might

receive from the just favor of his Prince some distinction in the way

of external rank, such as had seldom before been dreamt of as the

possible consequence of a mere literary celebrity. It was about this

time that the compiler of these pages first had the opportunity of

observing the plain easy modesty which had survived the many

temptations of such a career; and the kindness of heart pervading, in

all circumstances, his gentle deportment, which made him the rare,

perhaps the solitary, example of a man signally elevated from humble

beginnings, and loved more and more by his earliest friends and

connections, in proportion as he had fixed on himself the homage of

the great, and the wonder of the world.

It was during the sitting of the General Assembly of the Kirk in May,

1818, that I first had the honor of meeting him in private society:

the party was not a large one, at the house of a much-valued common

friend--Mr. Home Drummond of Blair Drummond, the grandson of Lord

Kames. Mr. Scott, ever apt to consider too favorably the literary

efforts of others, and more especially of very young persons, received

me, when I was presented to him, with a cordiality which I had not

been prepared to expect from one filling a station so exalted. This,

however, is the same story that every individual, who ever met him

under similar circumstances, has had to tell. When the ladies retired

from the dinner-table, I happened to sit next him; and he, having

heard that I had lately returned from a tour in Germany, made that

country and its recent literature the subject of some conversation. In

the course of it, I told him that when, on reaching the inn at Weimar,

I asked the waiter whether Goethe was then in the town, the man stared

as if he had not heard the name before; and that on my repeating the

question, adding _Goethe der grosse dichter_ (the great poet), he

shook his head as doubtfully as {p.238} before--until the landlady

solved our difficulties, by suggesting that perhaps the traveller

might mean "the _Herr Geheimer-Rath_ (Privy Counsellor) _Von Goethe_."

Scott seemed amused with this, and said, "I hope you will come one of

these days and see me at Abbotsford; and when you reach Selkirk or

Melrose, be sure you ask even the landlady for nobody but _the

Sheriff_." He appeared particularly interested when I described Goethe

as I first saw him, alighting from a carriage, crammed with wild

plants and herbs which he had picked up in the course of his morning's

botanizing among the hills above Jena. "I am glad," said he, "that my

old master has pursuits somewhat akin to my own. I am no botanist,

properly speaking; and though a dweller on the banks of the Tweed,

shall never be knowing about Flora's beauties;[106] but how I should

like to have a talk with him about trees!" I mentioned how much any

one must be struck with the majestic beauty of Goethe's countenance

(the noblest certainly by far that I have ever yet seen): "Well," said

he, "the grandest demigod I ever saw was Dr. Carlyle, minister of

Musselburgh, commonly called _Jupiter Carlyle_, from having sat more

than once for the king of gods and men to Gavin Hamilton--and a

shrewd, clever old carle was he, no doubt, but no more a poet than his

precentor. As for poets, I have seen, I believe, all the best of our

own time and country--and, though Burns had the most glorious eyes

imaginable, I never thought any of them would come up to an artist's

notion of the character, except Byron." A reverend gentleman present

(I think, Principal Nicoll of St. Andrews) expressed his regret that

he had never seen Lord Byron. "And the prints," resumed Scott, "give

one no impression of him--the lustre is there, Doctor, but it is not

lighted up. Byron's countenance is _a thing to dream of_. A certain

fair lady, whose name has been too often {p.239} mentioned in

connection with his, told a friend of mine, that when she first saw

Byron, it was in a crowded room, and she did not know who it was, but

her eyes were instantly nailed, and she said to herself, _that pale

face is my fate_. And, poor soul, if a godlike face and godlike powers

could have made any excuse for devilry, to be sure she had one." In

the course of this talk, an old friend and schoolfellow of

Scott's[107] asked him across the table if he had any faith in the

antique busts of Homer. "No, truly," he answered, smiling, "for if

there had been either limners or stuccoyers worth their salt in those

days, the owner of such a headpiece would never have had to trail the

poke. They would have alimented the honest man decently among them for

a lay-figure."

[Footnote 106:

"What beauties does Flora disclose,

How sweet are her smiles upon Tweed," etc.--_Crawford._]

[Footnote 107: The late Sir Patrick Murray of

Ochtertyre, Bart.--one of the Scotch Barons of

Exchequer.]

A few days after this, I received a communication from the Messrs.

Ballantyne, to the effect that Mr. Scott's various avocations had

prevented him from fulfilling his agreement with them as to the

historical department of the Edinburgh Annual Register for 1816, and

that it would be acceptable to him as well as them, if I could

undertake to supply it in the course of the autumn. This proposal was

agreed to on my part, and I had consequently occasion to meet him

pretty often during that summer session. He told me, that if the war

had gone on, he should have liked to do the historical summary as

before; but that the prospect of having no events to record but

radical riots, and the passing or rejecting of corn bills and poor

bills, sickened him; that his health was no longer what it had been;

and that though he did not mean to give over writing altogether--(here

he smiled significantly, and glanced his eye towards a pile of MS. on

the desk by him)--he thought himself now entitled to write nothing but

what would rather be an amusement than a fatigue to him--"_Juniores ad

labores_."

{p.240} He at this time occupied as his _den_ a square small room,

behind the dining parlor in Castle Street. It had but a single

Venetian window, opening on a patch of turf not much larger than

itself, and the aspect of the place was on the whole sombrous. The

walls were entirely clothed with books; most of them folios and

quartos, and all in that complete state of repair which at a glance

reveals a tinge of bibliomania. A dozen volumes or so, needful for

immediate purposes of reference, were placed close by him on a small

movable frame--something like a dumb-waiter. All the rest were in

their proper niches, and wherever a volume had been lent, its room was

occupied by a wooden block of the same size, having a card with the

name of the borrower and date of the loan, tacked on its front. The

old bindings had obviously been retouched and regilt in the most

approved manner; the new, when the books were of any mark, were rich,

but never gaudy--a large proportion of blue morocco--all stamped with

his _device_ of the portcullis, and its motto, _clausus tutus

ero_--being an anagram of his name in Latin. Every case and shelf was

accurately lettered, and the works arranged systematically; history

and biography on one side--poetry and the drama on another--law books

and dictionaries behind his own chair. The only table was a massive

piece of furniture which he had had constructed on the model of one at

Rokeby, with a desk and all its appurtenances on either side, that an

amanuensis might work opposite to him when he chose; and with small

tiers of drawers, reaching all round to the floor. The top displayed a

goodly array of session papers, and on the desk below were, besides

the MS. at which he was working, sundry parcels of letters, proof

sheets, and so forth, all neatly done up with red tape. His own

writing apparatus was a very handsome old box, richly carved, lined

with crimson velvet, and containing ink-bottles, taper-stand, etc., in

silver--the whole in such order that it might have come from the

silversmith's {p.241} window half an hour before. Besides his own

huge elbow-chair, there were but two others in the room, and one of

these seemed, from its position, to be reserved exclusively for the

amanuensis. I observed, during the first evening I spent with him in

this _sanctum_, that while he talked, his hands were hardly ever

idle--sometimes he folded letter-covers--sometimes he twisted paper

into matches, performing both tasks with great mechanical expertness

and nicety; and when there was no loose paper fit to be so dealt with,

he snapped his fingers, and the noble Maida aroused himself from his

lair on the hearth-rug, and laid his head across his master's knees,

to be caressed and fondled. The room had no space for pictures except

one, an original portrait of Claverhouse, which hung over the

chimney-piece, with a Highland target on either side, and broadswords

and dirks (each having its own story), disposed star-fashion round

them. A few green tin-boxes, such as solicitors keep title-deeds in,

were piled over each other on one side of the window; and on the top

of these lay a fox's tail, mounted on an antique silver handle,

wherewith, as often as he had occasion to take down a book, he gently

brushed the dust off the upper leaves before opening it. I think I

have mentioned all the furniture of the room except a sort of ladder,

low, broad, well carpeted, and strongly guarded with oaken rails, by

which he helped himself to books from his higher shelves. On the top

step of this convenience, Hinse of Hinsfeldt, (so called from one of

the German _Kinder-märchen_,) a venerable tom-cat, fat and sleek, and

no longer very locomotive, usually lay watching the proceedings of his

master and Maida with an air of dignified equanimity; but when Maida

chose to leave the party, he signified his inclinations by thumping

the door with his huge paw, as violently as ever a fashionable footman

handled a knocker in Grosvenor Square; the Sheriff rose and opened it

for him with courteous alacrity,--and then Hinse came {p.242} down

purring from his perch, and mounted guard by the footstool, _vice_

Maida absent upon furlough.[108] Whatever discourse might be passing,

was broken every now and then by some affectionate apostrophe to these

four-footed friends. He said they understood everything he said to

them--and I believe they did understand a great deal of it. But at all

events, dogs and cats, like children, have some infallible tact for

discovering at once who is and who is not really fond of their

company; and I venture to say, Scott was never five minutes in any

room before the little pets of the family, whether dumb or lisping,

had found out his kindness for all their generation.

[Footnote 108: [Of Hinse, Washington Irving writes in

his _Abbotsford_:--

"Among the other important and privileged members of the

household who figured in attendance at dinner, was a

large gray cat, who, I observed, was regaled from time

to time with titbits from the table. This sage grimalkin

was a favorite of both master and mistress, and slept at

night in their room, and Scott laughingly observed, that

one of the least wise parts of their establishment was

that the window was left open at night for puss to go in

and out. The cat assumed a kind of ascendency among the

quadrupeds--sitting in state in Scott's armchair, and

occasionally stationing himself on a chair beside the

door, as if to review his subjects as they passed,

giving each dog a cuff beside the ears as he went by.

This clapper-clawing was always taken in good part; it

appeared to be, in fact, a mere act of sovereignty on

the part of grimalkin to remind the others of their

vassalage; which they acknowledged by the most perfect

acquiescence. A general harmony prevailed between

sovereign and subjects, and they would all sleep

together in the sunshine."]]

I never thought it lawful to keep a journal of what passes in private

society, so that no one need expect from the sequel of this narrative

any detailed record of Scott's familiar talk. What fragments of it

have happened to adhere to a tolerably retentive memory, and may be

put into black and white without wounding any feelings which my

friend, were he alive, would have wished to spare, I shall introduce

as the occasion suggests or serves. But I disclaim on the threshold

anything more than this; and I also wish to enter a protest once for

all against the general fidelity of several literary gentlemen who

have kindly forwarded to me private lucubrations {p.243} of theirs,

designed to _Boswellize_ Scott, and which they may probably publish

hereafter. To report conversations fairly, it is a necessary

prerequisite that we should be completely familiar with all the

interlocutors, and understand thoroughly all their minutest relations,

and points of common knowledge and common feeling with each other. He

who does not, must be perpetually in danger of misinterpreting

sportive allusion into serious statement; and the man who was only

recalling, by some jocular phrase or half-phrase, to an old companion,

some trivial reminiscence of their boyhood or youth, may be

represented as expressing, upon some person or incident casually

tabled, an opinion which he had never framed, or if he had, would

never have given words to in any mixed assemblage--not even among what

the world calls _friends_ at his own board. In proportion as a man is

witty and humorous, there will always be about him and his a widening

maze and wilderness of cues and catchwords, which the uninitiated

will, if they are bold enough to try interpretation, construe, ever

and anon, egregiously amiss--not seldom into arrant falsity. For this

one reason, to say nothing of many others, I consider no man justified

in journalizing what he sees and hears in a domestic circle where he

is not thoroughly at home; and I think there are still higher and

better reasons why he should not do so where he is.

Before I ever met Scott in private, I had, of course, heard many

people describe and discuss his style of conversation. Everybody

seemed to agree that it overflowed with hearty good-humor, as well as

plain unaffected good sense and sagacity; but I had heard not a few

persons of undoubted ability and accomplishment maintain that the

genius of the great poet and novelist rarely, if ever, revealed itself

in his talk. It is needless to say, that the persons I allude to were

all his own countrymen, and themselves imbued, more or less, with the

conversational habits derived from a system of education in which the

{p.244} study of metaphysics occupies a very large share of

attention. The best table-talk of Edinburgh was, and probably still

is, in a very great measure made up of brilliant disquisition--such as

might be transferred without alteration to a professor's note-book, or

the pages of a critical Review--and of sharp word-catchings, ingenious

thrusting and parrying of dialectics, and all the quips and quibblets

of bar pleading. It was the talk of a society to which lawyers and

lecturers had, for at least a hundred years, given the tone. From the

date of the Union, Edinburgh ceased to be the headquarters of the

Scotch nobility--and long before the time of which I speak, they had

all but entirely abandoned it as a place of residence. I think I never

knew above two or three of the Peerage to have houses there at the

same time--and these were usually among the poorest and most

insignificant of their order. The wealthier gentry had followed their

example. Very few of that class ever spent any considerable part of

the year in Edinburgh, except for the purposes of educating their

children, or superintending the progress of a lawsuit; and these were

not more likely than a score or two of comatose and lethargic old

Indians, to make head against the established influences of academical

and forensic celebrity. Now Scott's tastes and resources had not much

in common with those who had inherited and preserved the chief

authority in this provincial hierarchy of rhetoric. He was highly

amused with watching their dexterous logomachies--but his delight in

such displays arose mainly, I cannot doubt, from the fact of their

being, both as to subject-matter and style and method, remote _a

Scævolæ studiis_. He sat by, as he would have done at a stage-play or

a fencing-match, enjoying and applauding the skill exhibited, but

without feeling much ambition to parade himself as a rival either of

the foil or the buskin. I can easily believe, therefore, that in the

earlier part of his life--before the blaze of universal fame had

overawed {p.245} local prejudice, and a new generation, accustomed to

hear of that fame from their infancy, had grown up--it may have been

the commonly adopted creed in Edinburgh, that Scott, however

distinguished otherwise, was not to be named as a table-companion in

the same day with this or that master of luminous dissertation or

quick rejoinder, who now sleeps as forgotten as his grandmother. It

was natural enough that persons brought up in the same circle with

him, who remembered all his beginnings, and had but slowly learned to

acquiesce in the justice of his claim to unrivalled honor in

literature, should have clung all the closer for that late

acquiescence to their original estimate of him as inferior to

themselves in other titles to admiration. It was also natural that

their prejudice on that score should be readily taken up by the young

aspirants who breathed, as it were, the atmosphere of their

professional renown. Perhaps, too, Scott's steady Toryism, and the

effect of his genius and example in modifying the intellectual sway of

the long dominant Whigs in the north, may have had some share in this

matter. However all that may have been, the substance of what I had

been accustomed to hear certainly was, that Scott had a marvellous

stock of queer stories, which he often told with happy effect, but

that, bating these drafts on a portentous memory, set off with a

simple old-fashioned _naïveté_ of humor and pleasantry, his strain of

talk was remarkable neither for depth of remark nor felicity of

illustration; that his views and opinions on the most important topics

of practical interest were hopelessly perverted by his blind

enthusiasm for the dreams of bygone ages; and that, but for the

grotesque phenomenon presented by a great writer of the nineteenth

century gravely uttering sentiments worthy of his own Dundees and

Invernahyles, the main texture of his discourse would be pronounced,

by any enlightened member of modern society, rather bald and poor than

otherwise. I think the epithet most in vogue was _commonplace_.

{p.246} It will easily be believed that, in companies such as I have

been alluding to, made up of, or habitually domineered over, by

voluble Whigs and political economists, Scott was often tempted to put

forth his Tory doctrines and antiquarian prejudices in an exaggerated

shape--in colors, to say the truth, altogether different from what

they assumed under other circumstances, or which had any real

influence upon his mind and conduct on occasions of practical moment.

But I fancy it will seem equally credible, that the most sharp-sighted

of these social critics may not always have been capable of tracing,

and doing justice to, the powers which Scott brought to bear upon the

topics which they, not he, had chosen for discussion. In passing from

a gas-lit hall into a room with wax candles, the guests sometimes

complain that they have left splendor for gloom; but let them try by

what sort of light it is most satisfactory to read, write, or

embroider, or consider at leisure under which of the two, either men

or women look their best.

The strongest, purest, and least observed of all lights, is, however,

daylight; and his talk was commonplace, just as sunshine is, which

gilds the most indifferent objects, and adds brilliancy to the

brightest. As for the old-world anecdotes which these clever persons

were condescending enough to laugh at as pleasant extravagances,

serving merely to relieve and set off the main stream of debate, they

were often enough, it may be guessed, connected with the theme in hand

by links not the less apt that they might be too subtle to catch their

bedazzled and self-satisfied optics. There might be keener knowledge

of human nature than was "dreamt of in their philosophy"--which passed

with them for _commonplace_, only because it was clothed in plain

familiar household words, not dressed up in some pedantic masquerade

of antithesis. "There are people," says Landor, "who think they write

and speak finely, merely because they have forgotten the language in

which their fathers and {p.247} mothers used to talk to them;" and

surely there are a thousand homely old proverbs, which many a dainty

modern would think it beneath his dignity to quote either in speech or

writing, any one of which condenses more wit (take that word in any of

its senses) than could be extracted from all that was ever said or

written by the _doctrinaires_ of the Edinburgh school. Many of those

gentlemen held Scott's conversation to be commonplace exactly for the

same reason that a child thinks a perfectly limpid stream, though

perhaps deep enough to drown it three times over, must needs be

shallow. But it will be easily believed that the best and highest of

their own idols had better means and skill of measurement: I can never

forget the pregnant expression of one of the ablest of that school and

party--Lord Cockburn--who, when some glib youth chanced to echo in his

hearing the consolatory tenet of local mediocrity, answered quietly:

"I have the misfortune to think differently from you--in my humble

opinion, Walter Scott's _sense_ is a still more wonderful thing than

his _genius_."

Indeed I have no sort of doubt that, long before 1818, full justice

was done to Scott, even in these minor things, by all those of his

Edinburgh acquaintance, whether Whig or Tory, on whose personal

opinion he could have been supposed to set much value. With few

exceptions, the really able lawyers of his own or nearly similar

standing had ere that time attained stations of judicial dignity, or

were in the springtide of practice; and in either case they were

likely to consider general society much in his own fashion, as the

joyous relaxation of life, rather than the theatre of exertion and

display. Their tables were elegantly, some of them sumptuously spread;

and they lived in a pretty constant interchange of entertainments upon

a large scale, in every circumstance of which, conversation included,

it was their ambition to imitate those voluptuous metropolitan

circles, wherein most of them had from time to time mingled, and

several of them {p.248} with distinguished success. Among such

prosperous gentlemen, like himself past the _mezzo cammin_, Scott's

picturesque anecdotes, rich easy humor, and gay involuntary glances of

mother-wit, were, it is not difficult to suppose, appreciated above

contributions of a more ambitious stamp; and no doubt his London

_réputation de salon_ (which had by degrees risen to a high pitch,

although he cared nothing for it) was not without its effect in

Edinburgh. But still the old prejudice lingered on in the general

opinion of the place, especially among the smart praters of _the

Outer-House_, whose glimpses of the social habits of their superiors

were likely to be rare, and their gall-bladders to be more distended

than their purses.

In truth, it was impossible to listen to Scott's oral narrations,

whether gay or serious, or to the felicitous fun with which he parried

absurdities of all sorts, without discovering better qualities in his

talk than _wit_--and of a higher order; I mean especially a power of

_vivid painting_--the true and primary sense of what is called

_Imagination_. He was like Jaques--though not a "Melancholy Jaques;"

and "moralized" a common topic "into a thousand similitudes."

Shakespeare and the banished Duke would have found him "full of

matter." He disliked mere disquisitions in Edinburgh, and prepared

_impromptus_ in London; and puzzled the promoters of such things

sometimes by placid silence, sometimes by broad merriment. To such men

he seemed _commonplace_--not so to the most dexterous masters in what

was to some of them almost a science; not so to Rose, Hallam, Moore,

or Rogers,--to Ellis, Mackintosh, Croker, or Canning.

Scott managed to give and receive such great dinners as I have been

alluding to, at least as often as any other private gentleman in

Edinburgh; but he very rarely accompanied his wife and daughters to

the evening assemblies, which commonly ensued under other roofs--for

{p.249} _early to rise_, unless in the case of spare-fed anchorites,

takes for granted _early to bed_. When he had no dinner engagement, he

frequently gave a few hours to the theatre; but still more frequently,

when the weather was fine, and still more, I believe, to his own

satisfaction, he drove out with some of his family, or a single

friend, in an open carriage; the favorite rides being either to the

Blackford Hills, or to Ravelston, and so home by Corstorphine; or to

the beach of Portobello, where Peter was always instructed to keep his

horses as near as possible to the sea. More than once, even in the

first summer of my acquaintance with him, I had the pleasure of

accompanying him on these evening excursions; and never did he seem to

enjoy himself more fully than when placidly surveying, at such sunset

or moonlight hours, either the massive outlines of his "own romantic

town," or the tranquil expanse of its noble estuary. He delighted,

too, in passing, when he could, through some of the quaint windings of

the ancient city itself, now deserted, except at mid-day, by the upper

world. How often have I seen him go a long way round about, rather

than miss the opportunity of halting for a few minutes on the vacant

esplanade of Holyrood, or under the darkest shadows of the Castle

rock, where it overhangs the Grassmarket, and the huge slab that still

marks where the gibbet of Porteous and the Covenanters had its

station. His coachman knew him too well to move at a Jehu's pace

amidst such scenes as these. No funeral hearse crept more leisurely

than did his landau up the Canongate or the Cowgate; and not a queer

tottering gable but recalled to him some long-buried memory of

splendor or bloodshed, which, by a few words, he set before the hearer

in the reality of life. His image is so associated in my mind with the

antiquities of his native place, that I cannot now revisit them

without feeling as if I were treading on his gravestone.

Whatever might happen on the other evenings of the {p.250} week, he

always dined at home on Sunday, and usually some few friends were then

with him, but never any person with whom he stood on ceremony. These

were, it may be readily supposed, the most agreeable of his

entertainments. He came into the room rubbing his hands, his face

bright and gleesome, like a boy arriving at home for the holidays, his

Peppers and Mustards gambolling about his heels, and even the stately

Maida grinning and wagging his tail in sympathy. Among the most

regular guests on these happy evenings were, in my time, as had long

before been the case, Mrs. Maclean Clephane of Torloisk (with whom he

agreed cordially on all subjects except the authenticity of Ossian),

and her daughters, whose guardian he had become, at their own choice.

The eldest of them had been for some years married to the Earl Compton

(now Marquis of Northampton), and was of course seldom in the north;

but the others had much of the same tastes and accomplishments which

so highly distinguished the late Lady Northampton; and Scott delighted

especially in their proficiency in the poetry and music of their

native isles. Mr. and Mrs. Skene of Rubislaw were frequent

attendants--and so were the Macdonald-Buchanans of Drumakiln, whose

eldest daughter, Isabella, was his chief favorite among all his

_nieces_ of the Clerk's table--as was, among the _nephews_, my own

dear friend and companion, Joseph Hume, a singularly graceful young

man, rich in the promise of hereditary genius, but, alas, cut off in

the early bloom of his days. The well-beloved Erskine was seldom

absent; and very often Terry or James Ballantyne came with

him--sometimes, though less frequently, Constable. Among other persons

who now and then appeared at these "dinners without the silver

dishes," as Scott called them, I may mention--to say nothing of such

old cronies as Mr. Clerk, Mr. Thomson, and Mr. Kirkpatrick Sharpe--Sir

Alexander Boswell of Auchinleck, who had all his father _Bozzy's_

cleverness, good-humor, {p.251} and joviality, without one touch of

his meaner qualities,--wrote Jenny dang the Weaver, and some other

popular songs, which he sang capitally--and was moreover a thorough

bibliomaniac; the late Sir Alexander Don of Newton, in all courteous

and elegant accomplishments the model of a cavalier; and last, not

least, William Allan, R. A., who had shortly before this time returned

to Scotland from several years of travel in Russia and Turkey. At one

of these plain hearty dinners, however, the company rarely exceeded

three or four, besides the as yet undivided family.

Scott had a story of a topping goldsmith on the Bridge, who prided

himself on being the mirror of Amphitryons, and accounted for his

success by stating that it was his invariable custom to set his own

stomach at ease, by a beefsteak and a pint of port in his back-shop,

half an hour before the arrival of his guests. But the host of Castle

Street had no occasion to imitate this prudent arrangement, for his

appetite at dinner was neither keen nor nice. Breakfast was his chief

meal. Before that came, he had gone through the severest part of his

day's work, and he then set to with the zeal of Crabbe's Squire

Tovell--

"And laid at once a pound upon his plate."

No fox-hunter ever prepared himself for the field by more substantial

appliances. His table was always provided, in addition to the usually

plentiful delicacies of a Scotch breakfast, with some solid article,

on which he did most lusty execution--a round of beef--a pasty, such

as made Gil Blas's eyes water--or, most welcome of all, a cold sheep's

head, the charms of which primitive dainty he has so gallantly

defended against the disparaging sneers of Dr. Johnson and his

bear-leader.[109] A huge brown loaf flanked his elbow, and it was

placed upon a broad wooden trencher, that he might cut and come again

with the bolder knife. Often did the _Clerks' {p.252} coach_,

commonly called among themselves _the Lively_--which trundled round

every morning to pick up the brotherhood, and then deposited them at

the proper minute in the Parliament Close--often did this lumbering

hackney arrive at his door before he had fully appeased what Homer

calls "the sacred rage of hunger;" and vociferous was the merriment of

the learned _uncles_, when the surprised poet swung forth to join

them, with an extemporized sandwich, that looked like a ploughman's

luncheon, in his hand. But this robust supply would have served him in

fact for the day. He never tasted anything more before dinner, and at

dinner he ate almost as sparingly as Squire Tovell's niece from the

boarding-school,--

--"Who cut the sanguine flesh in frustums fine,

And marvelled much to see the creatures dine."

[Footnote 109: See Croker's _Boswell_ (edit. 1831), vol.

iii p. 38.]

The only dishes he was at all fond of were the old-fashioned ones to

which he had been accustomed in the days of Saunders Fairford; and

which really are excellent dishes,--such, in truth, as Scotland

borrowed from France before Catherine de' Medici brought in her

Italian _virtuosi_ to revolutionize the kitchen like the court. Of

most of these, I believe, he has in the course of his novels found

some opportunity to record his esteem. But, above all, who can forget

that his King Jamie, amidst the splendors of Whitehall, thinks himself

an ill-used monarch unless his first course includes _cocky-leeky_?

It is a fact, which some philosophers may think worth setting down,

that Scott's organization, as to more than one of the senses, was the

reverse of exquisite. He had very little of what musicians call an

ear; his smell was hardly more delicate. I have seen him stare about,

quite unconscious of the cause, when his whole company betrayed their

uneasiness at the approach of an overkept haunch of venison; and

neither by the nose nor the palate could he distinguish corked wine

from sound. He could never tell Madeira from sherry,--nay, an Oriental

friend having sent him a butt of _sheeraz_, when he {p.253}

remembered the circumstance some time afterwards, and called for a

bottle to have Sir John Malcolm's opinion of its quality, it turned

out that his butler, mistaking the label, had already served up half

the bin as _sherry_. Port he considered as physic: he never willingly

swallowed more than one glass of it, and was sure to anathematize a

second, if offered, by repeating John Home's epigram:--

"Bold and erect the Caledonian stood,

Old was his mutton, and his claret good;

Let him drink port, the English statesman cried--

He drank the poison, and his spirit died."

In truth, he liked no wines except sparkling champagne and claret; but

even as to this last he was no connoisseur; and sincerely preferred a

tumbler of whiskey-toddy to the most precious "liquid ruby" that ever

flowed in the cup of a prince. He rarely took any other potation when

quite alone with his family; but at the Sunday board he circulated the

champagne briskly during dinner, and considered a pint of claret each

man's fair share afterwards. I should not omit, however, that his

Bordeaux was uniformly preceded by a small libation of the genuine

_mountain dew_, which he poured with his own hand, _more majorum_, for

each guest--making use for the purpose of such a multifarious

collection of ancient Highland _quaighs_ (little cups of curiously

dovetailed wood, inlaid with silver) as no Lowland sideboard but his

was ever equipped with--but commonly reserving for himself one that

was peculiarly precious in his eyes, as having travelled from

Edinburgh to Derby in the canteen of Prince Charlie. This relic had

been presented to "the wandering Ascanius" by some very careful

follower, for its bottom is of glass, that he who quaffed might keep

his eye the while upon the dirk hand of his companion.

The sound of music (even, I suspect, of any sacred music but

psalm-singing) would be considered indecorous {p.254} in the streets

of Edinburgh on a Sunday night; so, upon the occasions I am speaking

of, the harp was silent, and Otterburne and The Bonnie House of Airlie

must needs be dispensed with. To make amends, after tea in the

drawing-room, Scott usually read some favorite author for the

amusement of his little circle; or Erskine, Ballantyne, or Terry, did

so, at his request. He himself read aloud high poetry with far greater

simplicity, depth, and effect, than any other man I ever heard; and in

Macbeth or Julius Cæsar, or the like, I doubt if Kemble could have

been more impressive. Yet the changes of intonation were so gently

managed, that he contrived to set the different interlocutors clearly

before us, without the least approach to theatrical artifice. Not so

the others I have mentioned; they all read cleverly and agreeably, but

with the decided trickery of stage recitation. To them he usually gave

the book when it was a comedy, or, indeed, any other drama than

Shakespeare's or Joanna Baillie's. Dryden's Fables, Johnson's two

Satires, and certain detached scenes of Beaumont and Fletcher,

especially that in The Lover's Progress, where the ghost of the

musical innkeeper makes his appearance, were frequently selected. Of

the poets, his contemporaries, however, there was not one that did not

come in for his part. In Wordsworth, his pet pieces were, I think, the

Song for Brougham Castle, the Laodamia, and some of the early sonnets;

in Southey, Queen Orraca, Fernando Ramirez, the Lines on the Holly

Tree--and, of his larger poems, the Thalaba. Crabbe was perhaps, next

to Shakespeare, the standing resource; but in those days Byron was

pouring out his spirit fresh and full: and, if a new piece from his

hand had appeared, it was sure to be read by Scott the Sunday evening

afterwards, and that with such delighted emphasis as showed how

completely the elder bard had kept all his enthusiasm for poetry at

the pitch of youth, all his admiration of genius, free, pure, and

unstained by the least drop of literary {p.255} jealousy. Rare and

beautiful example of a happily constituted and virtuously disciplined

mind and character!

Very often something read aloud by himself or his friends suggested

an old story of greater compass than would have suited a

dinner-table--and he told it, whether serious or comical, or, as more

frequently happened, part of both, exactly in every respect in the

tone and style of the notes and illustrations to his novels. A great

number of his best oral narratives have, indeed, been preserved in

those parting lucubrations; and not a few in his letters. Yet very

many there were of which his pen has left no record--so many, that,

were I to task my memory, I could, I believe, recall the outlines at

least of more than would be sufficient to occupy a couple of these

volumes. Possibly, though well aware how little justice I could do to

such things, rather than think of their perishing forever, and leaving

not even a shadow behind, I may at some future day hazard the attempt.

Let me turn, meanwhile, to some dinner-tables very different from his

own, at which, from this time forward, I often met Scott. It is very

true of the societies I am about to describe, that he was "among them,

not of them;" and it is also most true that this fact was apparent in

all the demeanor of his bibliopolical and typographical allies towards

him whenever he visited them under their roofs--not a bit less so than

when they were received at his own board; but still, considering how

closely his most important worldly affairs were connected with the

personal character of the Ballantynes, I think it a part, though

neither a proud nor a very pleasing part, of my duty as his

biographer, to record my reminiscences of them and their doings in

some detail.

James Ballantyne then lived in St. John Street, a row of good,

old-fashioned, and spacious houses, adjoining the Canongate and

Holyrood, and at no great distance from his printing establishment. He

had married a few {p.256} years before the daughter of a wealthy

farmer in Berwickshire--a quiet, amiable woman, of simple manners, and

perfectly domestic habits: a group of fine young children were growing

up about him; and he usually, if not constantly, had under his roof

his aged mother, his and his wife's tender care of whom it was most

pleasing to witness. As far as a stranger might judge, there could not

be a more exemplary household, or a happier one; and I have

occasionally met the poet in St. John Street when there were no other

guests but Erskine, Terry, George Hogarth,[110] and another intimate

friend or two, and when James Ballantyne was content to appear in his

own true and best colors, the kind head of his family, the respectful

but honest schoolfellow of Scott, the easy landlord of a plain,

comfortable table. But when any great event was about to take place in

the business, especially on the eve of a new novel, there were doings

of a higher strain in St. John Street; and to be present at one of

those scenes was truly a rich treat, even--if not especially--for

persons who, like myself, had no more _knowledge_ than the rest of the

world as to the authorship of Waverley. Then were congregated about

the printer all his own literary allies, of whom a considerable number

were by no means personally familiar with "THE GREAT UNKNOWN:"--who,

by the way, owed to him that widely adopted title;--and He

appeared among the rest with his usual open aspect of buoyant

good-humor--although it was not difficult to trace, in the occasional

play of his features, the diversion it afforded him to watch all the

procedure of his swelling confidant, and the curious neophytes that

surrounded the well-spread board.

[Footnote 110: George Hogarth, Esq., W. S., brother of

Mrs. James Ballantyne. This gentleman is now well known

in the literary world; especially by a History of Music,

of which all who understand that science speak highly.

[He was the father-in-law of Charles Dickens, and for

many years a musical and dramatic critic in London.]]

The feast was, to use one of James's own favorite epithets, {p.257}

_gorgeous_; an aldermanic display of turtle and venison, with the

suitable accompaniments of iced punch, potent ale, and generous

Madeira. When the cloth was drawn, the burly preses arose, with all he

could muster of the port of John Kemble, and spouted with a sonorous

voice the formula of Macbeth:--

"Fill full!

I drink to the general joy of the whole table!"

This was followed by "The King, God bless him!" and second

came--"Gentlemen, there is another toast which never has been nor

shall be omitted in this house of mine--I give you the health of Mr.

Walter Scott with three times three!" All honor having been done to

this health, and Scott having briefly thanked the company with some

expressions of warm affection to their host, Mrs. Ballantyne retired;

the bottles passed round twice or thrice in the usual way; and then

James rose once more, every vein on his brow distended, his eyes

solemnly fixed upon vacancy, to propose, not as before in his

stentorian key, but with "'bated breath," in the sort of whisper by

which a stage conspirator thrills the gallery,--"_Gentlemen, a bumper

to the immortal Author of Waverley!_" The uproar of cheering, in which

Scott made a fashion of joining, was succeeded by deep silence, and

then Ballantyne proceeded--

"In his Lord Burleigh look, serene and serious,

A something of imposing and mysterious"--

to lament the obscurity in which his illustrious but too modest

correspondent still chose to conceal himself from the plaudits of the

world, to thank the company for the manner in which the _nominis

umbra_ had been received, and to assure them that the Author of

Waverley would, when informed of the circumstance, feel highly

delighted--"the proudest hour of his life," etc., etc. The cool,

demure fun of Scott's features during all this mummery was perfect;

and Erskine's attempt at a gay _nonchalance_ was still more

ludicrously meritorious. Aldiborontiphoscophornio, {p.258} however,

bursting as he was, knew too well to allow the new novel to be made

the subject of discussion. Its name was announced, and success to it

crowned another cup; but after that, no more of Jedediah. To cut the

thread, he rolled out unbidden some one of his many theatrical songs,

in a style that would have done no dishonor to almost any

orchestra--The Maid of Lodi--or perhaps, The Bay of Biscay, O!--or The

Sweet Little Cherub that Sits up Aloft. Other toasts followed,

interspersed with ditties from other performers;--old George Thomson,

the friend of Burns, was ready, for one, with The Moorland Wedding, or

Willie Brew'd a Peck o' Maut;--and so it went on, until Scott and

Erskine, with any clerical or very staid personage that had chanced to

be admitted, saw fit to withdraw. Then the scene was changed. The

claret and olives made way for broiled bones and a mighty bowl of

punch; and when a few glasses of the hot beverage had restored his

powers, James opened _ore rotundo_ on the merits of the forthcoming

romance. "One chapter, one chapter only," was the cry. After "_Nay,

by'r Lady, nay!_" and a few more coy shifts, the proof sheets were at

length produced, and James, with many a prefatory hem, read aloud what

he considered as the most striking dialogue they contained.

The first I heard so read was the interview between Jeanie Deans, the

Duke of Argyle, and Queen Caroline, in Richmond Park; and

notwithstanding some spice of the pompous tricks to which he was

addicted, I must say he did the inimitable scene great justice. At all

events, the effect it produced was deep and memorable, and no wonder

that the exulting typographer's _one bumper more to Jedediah

Cleishbotham_ preceded his parting stave, which was uniformly The Last

Words of Marmion, executed certainly with no contemptible rivalry of

Braham.

What a different affair was a dinner, although probably including many

of the same guests, at the junior partner's! He in those days

retained, I think, no private {p.259} apartments attached to his

auction-rooms in Hanover Street, over the door of which he still kept

emblazoned "John Ballantyne and Company, Booksellers." At any rate,

such of his entertainments as I ever saw Scott partake of, were given

at his villa near to the Frith of Forth, by Trinity;--a retreat which

the little man had named "Harmony Hall," and invested with an air of

dainty voluptuous finery, contrasting strikingly enough with the

substantial citizen-like snugness of his elder brother's domestic

appointments. His house was surrounded by gardens so contrived as to

seem of considerable extent, having many a shady tuft, trellised

alley, and mysterious alcove, interspersed among their bright

parterres. It was a fairy-like labyrinth, and there was no want of

pretty Armidas, such as they might be, to glide half-seen among its

mazes. The sitting-rooms opened upon gay and perfumed conservatories,

and John's professional excursions to Paris and Brussels in quest of

objects of _virtu_, had supplied both the temptation and the means to

set forth the interior in a fashion that might have satisfied the most

fastidious _petite maîtresse_ of Norwood or St. Denis. John, too, was

a married man: he had, however, erected for himself a private wing,

the accesses to which, whether from the main building or the

_bosquet_, were so narrow that it was physically impossible for the

handsome and portly lady who bore his name to force her person through

any one of them. His dinners were in all respects Parisian, for his

wasted palate disdained such John Bull luxuries as were all in all

with James. The piquant pasty of Strasburg or Perigord was never to

seek; and even the _pièce de résistance_ was probably a boar's head

from Coblentz, or a turkey ready stuffed with truffles from the Palais

Royal. The pictures scattered among John's innumerable mirrors were

chiefly of theatrical subjects--many of them portraits of beautiful

actresses--the same Peg Woffingtons, Bellamys, Kitty Clives, and so

forth, that {p.260} found their way in the sequel to Charles

Mathews's gallery at Highgate. Here that exquisite comedian's own

mimicries and parodies were the life and soul of many a festival, and

here, too, he gathered from his facetious host not a few of the

richest materials for his _at homes_ and _monopolylogues_. But,

indeed, whatever actor or singer of eminence visited Edinburgh, of the

evenings when he did not perform several were sure to be reserved for

Trinity. Here Braham quavered, and here Liston drolled his best--here

Johnstone, and Murray, and Yates mixed jest and stave--here Kean

revelled and rioted--and here the Roman Kemble often played the Greek

from sunset to dawn. Nor did the popular _cantatrice_ or _danseuse_ of

the time disdain to freshen her roses, after a laborious week, amidst

these Paphian arbors of Harmony Hall.

Johnny had other tastes that were equally expensive. He had a

well-furnished stable, and followed the foxhounds whenever the cover

was within an easy distance. His horses were all called after heroes

in Scott's poems or novels; and at this time he usually rode up to his

auction on a tall milk-white hunter, yclept _Old Mortality_, attended

by a leash or two of greyhounds,--Die Vernon, Jenny Dennison, and so

forth, by name. The featherweight himself appeared uniformly,

hammer-in-hand, in the half-dress of some sporting club--a light gray

frock, with emblems of the chase on its silver buttons, white cord

breeches, and jockey-boots in Meltonian order. Yet he affected in the

pulpit rather a grave address; and was really one of the most

plausible and imposing of the Puff tribe. Probably Scott's presence

overawed his ludicrous propensities; for the poet was, when sales were

going on, almost a daily attendant in Hanover Street, and himself not

the least energetic of the numerous competitors for Johnny's uncut

_fifteeners_, Venetian lamps, Milanese cuirasses, and old Dutch

cabinets. Maida, by the way, was so well aware of his master's

{p.261} habits, that about the time when the Court of Session was

likely to break up for the day, he might usually be seen couched in

expectation among Johnny's own _tail_ of greyhounds at the threshold

of the mart.

It was at one of those Trinity dinners this summer that I first saw

Constable. Being struck with his appearance, I asked Scott who he was,

and he told me--expressing some surprise that anybody should have

lived a winter or two in Edinburgh without knowing, by sight at least,

a citizen whose name was so familiar to the world. I happened to say

that I had not been prepared to find the great bookseller a man of

such gentlemanlike and even distinguished bearing. Scott smiled, and

answered, "Ay, Constable is indeed a grand-looking chield. He puts me

in mind of Fielding's apology for Lady Booby--to wit, that Joseph

Andrews had an air which, to those who had not seen many noblemen,

would give an idea of nobility." I had not in those days been much

initiated in the private jokes of what is called, by way of

excellence, _the trade_, and was puzzled when Scott, in the course of

the dinner, said to Constable, "Will your Czarish Majesty do me the

honor to take a glass of champagne?" I asked the master of the feast

for an explanation. "Oh!" said he, "are you so green as not to know

that Constable long since dubbed himself _The Czar of Muscovy_, John

Murray, _The Emperor of the West_, and Longman and his string of

partners _The Divan_?" "And what title," I asked, "has Mr. John

Ballantyne himself found in this new _almanach imperial_?"--"Let that

flee stick to the wa'," quoth Johnny: "When I set up for a bookseller,

The Crafty christened me _The Dey of Alljeers_--but he now considers

me as next thing to dethroned." He added, "His Majesty the autocrat is

too fond of these nicknames. One day a partner of the house of Longman

was dining with him in the country, to settle an important piece of

business, about which there occurred a good deal of difficulty. 'What

fine {p.262} swans you have in your pond there!' said the Londoner,

by way of parenthesis.--'Swans!' cried Constable; 'they are only

geese, man. There are just five of them, if you please to observe, and

their names are Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, and Brown.' This skit cost

The Crafty a good bargain."

It always appeared to me that James Ballantyne felt his genius rebuked

in the presence of Constable: his manner was constrained, his smile

servile, his hilarity elaborate. Not so with Johnny: the little fellow

never seemed more airily frolicsome than when he capered for the

amusement of the Czar.[111] I never, however, saw those two together,

where, I am told, the humors of them both were exhibited to the

richest advantage--I mean at the dinners with which Constable regaled,

among others, his own circle of literary serfs, and when "Jocund

Johnny" was very commonly his croupier. There are stories enough of

practical jokes upon such occasions, some of them near akin to those

which the author of Humphrey Clinker has thought fit to record of his

own suburban villa, in the most diverting of young Melford's letters

to Sir Watkin Philips. I have heard, for example, a luculent

description of poor _Allister Campbell_, and another drudge of the

same class, running a race after dinner for a new pair of breeches,

which Mr. David Bridges, tailor in ordinary to this northern

potentate,--himself a wit, a virtuoso, and the croupier on that day in

lieu of Rigdum,--had been instructed to bring with him, and display

before the threadbare rivals. But I had these pictures from John

Ballantyne, and I dare say they might be overcharged. That Constable

was a most bountiful and generous patron to the ragged tenants of Grub

Street, there can, however, be no doubt: and as {p.263} little that

John himself acted on all occasions by them in the same spirit, and

this to an extent greatly beyond what prudence (if he had ever

consulted that guide in anything) would have dictated.

[Footnote 111: "Now, John," cried Constable, one evening

after he had told one of his best stories, "now, John,

is that true?" His object evidently was, in Iago's

phrase, _to let down the pegs_; but Rigdum answered

gayly, "True, indeed! Not one word of it!--any blockhead

may stick to truth, my hearty--but 't is a sad hamperer

of genius."]

When I visited Constable, as I often did at a period somewhat later

than that of which I now speak, and for the most part in company with

Scott, I found the bookseller established in a respectable country

gentleman's seat, some six or seven miles out of Edinburgh, and doing

the honors of it with all the ease that might have been looked for had

he been the long-descended owner of the place; there was no foppery,

no show, no idle luxury, but to all appearance the plain abundance and

simple enjoyment of hereditary wealth. His conversation was manly and

vigorous, abounding in Scotch anecdotes of the old time, which he told

with a degree of spirit and humor only second to his great author's.

No man could more effectually control, when he had a mind, either the

extravagant vanity which, on too many occasions, made him ridiculous,

or the despotic temper, which habitually held in fear and trembling

all such as were in any sort dependent on his Czarish Majesty's

pleasure. In him I never saw (at this period) anything but the

unobtrusive sense and the calm courtesy of a well-bred gentleman. His

very equipage kept up the series of contrasts between him and the two

Ballantynes. Constable went back and forward between the town and

Polton in a deep-hung and capacious green barouche, without any

pretence at heraldic blazonry, drawn by a pair of sleek, black,

long-tailed horses, and conducted by a grave old coachman in plain

blue livery. The Printer of the Canongate drove himself and his wife

about the streets and suburbs in a snug machine, which did not

overburthen one powerful and steady cob; while the gay auctioneer,

whenever he left the saddle for the box, mounted a bright

blue dogcart, and rattled down the Newhaven road with two

high-mettled steeds, prancing _tandem_ before him, and {p.264} most

probably--especially if he was on his way to the races at

Musselburgh--with some "sweet singer of Israel" flaming, with all her

feathers, beside him. On such occasions, by the bye, Johnny sometimes

had a French horn with him, and he played on it with good skill, and

with an energy by no means prudent in the state of his lungs.

The Sheriff told with peculiar unction the following anecdote of this

spark. The first time he went over to pick up curiosities at Paris, it

happened that he met, in the course of his traffickings, a certain

brother bookseller of Edinburgh, as unlike him as one man could well

be to another--a grave, dry Presbyterian, rigid in all his notions as

the buckle of his wig. This precise worthy having ascertained John's

address, went to call on him, a day or two afterwards, with the news

of some richly illuminated missal, which he might possibly be glad to

make prize of. On asking for his friend, a smiling _laquais de place_

informed him that _Monsieur_ had gone out, but that _Madame_ was at

home. Not doubting that Mrs. Ballantyne had accompanied her husband on

his trip, he desired to pay his respects to _Madame_, and was ushered

in accordingly. "But oh, Mr. Scott!" said, or rather groaned, the

austere elder, on his return from this modern Babylon, "oh, Mr. Scott,

there was nae Mrs. John yonder, but a painted Jezebel sittin' up in

her bed, wi' a wheen impudent French limmers like hersel', and twa or

three whiskered blackguards, takin' their collation o' knickknacks and

champagne wine! I ran out o' the house as if I had been shot. What

judgment will this wicked warld come to! The Lord pity us!" Scott was

a severe enough censor in the general of such levities, but somehow,

in the case of Rigdumfunnidos, he seemed to regard them with much the

same toleration as the naughty tricks of a monkey in the "Jardin des

Plantes."

Why did Scott persist in mixing up all his most important {p.265}

concerns with such people as I have been describing? I asked himself

that question too unceremoniously at a long subsequent period, and in

due time the reader shall see the answer I received; but it left the

main question, to my apprehension, as much in the dark as ever. I

shall return to the sad subject hereafter more seriously; but in the

mean time let it suffice to say, that he was the most patient,

long-suffering, affectionate, and charitable of mankind; that in the

case of both the Ballantynes he could count, after all, on a

sincerely, nay, a passionately devoted attachment to his person; that,

with the greatest of human beings, use is in all but unconquerable

power; and that he who so loftily tossed aside the seemingly most

dangerous assaults of flattery, the blandishment of dames, the

condescension of princes, the enthusiasm of crowds--had still his weak

point, upon which two or three humble besiegers, and one unwearied,

though most frivolous underminer, well knew how to direct their

approaches. It was a favorite saw of his own, that the wisest of our

race often reserve the average stock of folly to be all expended upon

some one flagrant absurdity.

{p.266} CHAPTER XLII.

Publication of the Heart of Mid-Lothian. -- Its Reception in

Edinburgh and in England. -- Abbotsford in October. --

Melrose Abbey, Dryburgh, etc. -- Lion-hunters from America.

-- Tragedy of the Cherokee Lovers. -- Scott's Dinner to the

Selkirkshire Yeomen.

1818.

Hoping to be forgiven for a long digression, the biographer willingly

returns to the thread of Scott's story. The Heart of Mid-Lothian

appeared, as has been mentioned, before the close of June, 1818, and

among the letters which he received soon afterwards from the friends

by this time in the secret, there is one which (though I do not

venture to name the writer) I am tempted to take the liberty of

quoting:[112]--

[Footnote 112: [This letter was written August 11, by

Lady Louisa Stuart, and it appears in its original and

complete form in _Familiar Letters_, vol. ii. p. 18. To

the end of her long life, the writer was somewhat

influenced by the feeling prevailing in her youth as to

the loss of caste suffered by women of good social

position who appeared in print. Writing to Mrs. Lockhart

after her father's death, and enclosing some of his

letters, Lady Louisa says: "If Mr. Lockhart wishes to

insert any of these, I will beg not to be named. It is

not that I am not proud enough of having been honored

with _his_ regard, but I never yet saw my name in print,

and hope I never shall." Mr. Lockhart evidently in part

overcame this objection.]]

"Now for it, dear Mr. Scott. I can speak to the purpose, as

I have not only read it myself, but am in a house where

everybody is tearing it out of each other's hands, and

talking of nothing else. So much for its success--the more

flattering, because it overcomes a prejudice. People were

beginning to say the author would wear himself out; it was

going on too {p.267} long in the same key, and no striking

notes could possibly be produced. On the contrary, I think

the interest is stronger here than in any of the former

ones--(always excepting my first-love Waverley)--and one may

congratulate you upon having effected what many have tried

to do, and nobody yet succeeded in, making the perfectly

good character the most interesting. Of late days,

especially since it has been the fashion to write moral and

even religious novels, one might almost say of some of the

wise good heroines, what a lively girl once said to [me] of

her well-meaning aunt--'Upon my word she is enough to make

anybody wicked.' And though beauty and talents are heaped on

the right side, the writer, in spite of himself, is sure to

put agreeableness on the wrong; the person from whose errors

he means you should take warning, runs away with your secret

partiality in the mean time. Had this very story been

conducted by a common hand, Effie would have attracted all

our concern and sympathy--Jeanie only cold approbation.

Whereas Jeanie, without youth, beauty, genius, warm

passions, or any other novel-perfection, is here our object

from beginning to end. This is 'inlisting the affections in

the cause of virtue' ten times more than ever Richardson

did; for whose male and female pedants, all-excelling as

they are, I never could care half so much as I found myself

inclined to do for Jeanie before I finished the first

volume....

"You know I tell you my opinion just as I should do to a

third person, and I trust the freedom is not unwelcome. I

was a little tired of your Edinburgh lawyers in the

introduction; English people in general will be more so, as

well as impatient of the passages alluding to Scotch law

throughout. Mr. Saddletree will not entertain them. The

latter part of the fourth volume unavoidably flags to a

certain degree; after Jeanie is happily settled at

Roseneath, we have no more to wish for. But the chief fault

I have to find relates to the reappearance and shocking fate

of the boy. I hear on all sides, 'Oh, I do not like that!' I

cannot say what I would have had instead; but I do not like

it either; it is a lame, huddled conclusion. I know you so

well in it, by the bye!--you grow tired yourself, want to

get rid of the story, and hardly care how. Sir George

Staunton finishes his career very fitly; he ought not to die

in his bed, and for Jeanie's sake one would not have him

hanged. {p.268} It is unnatural, though, that he should

ever have gone within twenty miles of the Tolbooth, or shown

his face in the streets of Edinburgh, or dined at a public

meeting, if the Lord Commissioner had been his brother. Here

ends my _per contra_ account. The opposite page would make

my letter too long if I entered equally into particulars.

Carlisle and Corby Castles in Waverley did not affect me

more deeply than the prison and trial scenes. The end of

poor Madge Wildfire is also most pathetic. The meeting at

Muschat's Cairn tremendous. Dumbiedikes and Rory Bean are

delightful. And I shall own that my prejudices were secretly

gratified by the light in which you place [Uncle] John of

Argyle, whom Mr. Coxe so ran down to please Lord Orford. You

have drawn him to the very life. I heard so much of him in

my youth, so many anecdotes, so often 'as the Duke of Argyle

used to say'--that I really believe I am almost as good a

judge as if I had seen and lived with him.... [My beloved

mother] has told me, that when she married, [in 1737, the

very time], he was still remarkably handsome; with manners

more graceful and engaging than she ever saw in any one

else; the most agreeable person in conversation, the best

teller of a story. When fifty-seven thus captivates

eighteen, the natural powers of pleasing must be

extraordinary. You have likewise colored Queen Caroline

exactly right--but I was bred up in another creed about Lady

Suffolk, of whom, as a very old deaf woman, I have some

faint recollection. [My mother] knew her intimately, and

never would allow she had been the King's mistress, though

she owned it was currently believed. She said he had just

enough liking for her to make the Queen very civil to her,

and very jealous and spiteful; the rest remained always

uncertain at most, like a similar scandal in our days, where

I, for one, imagine love of seeming influence on one side,

and love of lounging, of an easy house and a good dinner on

the other, to be all the criminal passions concerned.

However, I confess, [my mother] had that in herself which

made her not ready to think the worst of her fellow-women.

"Did you ever hear the history of John, Duke of Argyle's

marriage, and constant attachment, before and after, to a

woman not handsomer or much more elegant than Jeanie Deans,

though very unlike her in understanding? I can give it you,

if you {p.269} wish it, for it is at my fingers' ends. [I

was so much the youngest of a numerous family that I had no

playfellow, and for that reason listened with all my ears to

the grown people's conversation, most especially when my

mother and the friends of her youth got upon old stories;

nor did I lose my taste for them when I grew old enough to

converse with her on equal terms, and enquire into

particulars.] Now I am [an] ancient [tabby] myself, I should

be a great treasure of anecdote to anybody who had the same

humor,--but I meet with few who have. They read vulgar tales

in books, Wraxall, and so forth, what the footmen and maids

only gave credit to at the moment, but they desire no

farther information. I dare swear many of your readers never

heard of the Duke of Argyle before. 'Pray, who was Sir

Robert Walpole,' they ask me, 'and when did he live?'--or

perhaps--'Was not the great Lord Chatham in Queen Anne's

days?'[113]

[Footnote 113: In 1827, Lady Louisa wrote for Caroline,

Lady Scott, a great-granddaughter of the duke, _Some

Account of John, Duke of Argyle, and his Family_. This

delightful memoir was first printed (privately) in 1863.

It was published in 1899, in _Selections from the

Manuscripts of Lady Louisa Stuart_.]

"[Amongst the persons most pleased here is Lady Charlotte

Lindsay. She has the true North humor, and love of humor,

and she does enjoy it heartily. They] have, to help [them],

an exemplification on two legs in [their] country

apothecary, whom you have painted over and over without the

honor of knowing him; an old, dry, arguing, prosing,

obstinate Scotchman, very shrewd, rather sarcastic, a sturdy

Whig and Presbyterian, _tirant un peu sur le démocrate_.

Your books are birdlime to him, however; he hovers about the

house to obtain a volume when others have done with it. I

long to ask him whether Douce Davie was any way _sib_ to

him. He acknowledges he would not _now_ go to Muschat's

Cairn at night for any money--he had such a horror of it

'sixty years ago' when a laddie. But I am come to the end of

my fourth page, and will not tire you with any more

scribbling....

"P. S.--If I had known nothing, and the whole world had told

me the contrary, I should have found you out in that one

parenthesis,--'for the man was mortal, and had been a

schoolmaster.'"

{p.270} This letter was addressed from a great country house in the

south[114]; and may, I presume, be accepted as a fair index of the

instantaneous English popularity of Jeanie Deans. From the choice of

localities, and the splendid blazoning of tragical circumstances that

had left the strongest impression on the memory and imagination of

every inhabitant, the reception of this tale in Edinburgh was a scene

of all-engrossing enthusiasm, such as I never witnessed there on the

appearance of any other literary novelty. But the admiration and

delight were the same all over Scotland. Never before had he seized

such really noble features of the national character as were canonized

in the person of his homely heroine: no art had ever devised a happier

running contrast than that of her and her sister, or interwoven a

portraiture of lowly manners and simple virtues, with more graceful

delineations of polished life, or with bolder shadows of terror,

guilt, crime, remorse, madness, and all the agony of the passions.

[Footnote 114: [Sheffield Place, the seat of Lord

Sheffield, the friend and editor of Gibbon.]]

In the introduction and notes to The Heart of Mid-Lothian, drawn up in

1830, we are presented with details concerning the suggestion of the

main plot, and the chief historical incidents made use of, to which I

can add nothing of any moment.

The 12th of July restored the author as usual to the supervision of

his trees and carpenters; but he had already told the Ballantynes that

the story which he had found it impossible to include in the recent

series of Jedediah should be forthwith taken up as the opening one of

a third; and instructed John to embrace the first favorable

opportunity of offering Constable the publication of this, on the

footing of 10,000 copies again forming the first edition; but now at

length without any more stipulations connected with the unfortunate

"old stock" of the Hanover Street Company.

{p.271} Before he settled himself to his work, however, he made a

little tour of the favorite description with his wife and

children--halting for a few days at Drumlanrig, thence crossing the

Border to Carlisle and Rokeby, and returning by way of Alnwick. On the

17th August he writes thus to John Ballantyne from Drumlanrig: "This

is heavenly weather, and I am making the most of it, as I shall have a

laborious autumn before me. I may say of my head and fingers as the

farmer of his mare, when he indulged her with an extra feed,--

'Ye ken that Maggie winna sleep

For that or Simmer.'

We have taken our own horses with us, and I have my pony, and ride

when I find it convenient."

* * * * *

The following seems to have been among the first letters he wrote

after his return:--

TO J. B. S. MORRITT, ESQ., M. P., ROKEBY.

ABBOTSFORD, 10th September, 1818.

MY DEAR MORRITT,--We have been cruising to and fro since we

left your land of woods and streams. Lord Melville wished me

to come and stay two days with him at Melville Castle, which

has broken in upon my time a little, and interrupted my

purpose of telling you as how we arrived safe at Abbotsford,

without a drop of rain, thus completing a tour of three

weeks in the same fine weather in which we commenced it--a

thing which never fell to my lot before. Captain Ferguson is

inducted into the office of Keeper of the Regalia, to the

great joy, I think, of all Edinburgh. He has entered upon a

farm (of eleven acres) in consequence of this advancement,

for you know it is a general rule, that whenever a Scotsman

gets his head _above water_, he immediately turns it to

_land_. As he has already taken all the advice of all the

_notables_ in and about the good village of Darnick, we

expect to see his farm look like a tailor's {p.272} book of

patterns, a snip of every several opinion which he has

received occupying its appropriate corner. He is truly what

the French call _un drôle de corps_.

I wish you would allow your coachman to look out for me

among your neighbors a couple of young colts (rising three

would be the best age) that would match for a carriage some

two years hence. I have plenty of grass for them in the mean

while, and should never know the expense of their keep at

Abbotsford. He seemed to think he could pick them up at from

£25 to £30, which would make an immense saving hereafter.

Peter Matheson and he had arranged some sort of plan of this

kind. For a pair of very ordinary carriage-horses in

Edinburgh they ask £140 or more; so it is worth while to be

a little provident. Even then you only get one good horse,

the other being usually a brute. Pray you excuse all this

palaver,--

"These little things are great to little men."

Our harvest is almost all in, but as farmers always grumble

about something, they are now growling about the lightness

of the crop. All the young part of our household are wrapt

up in uncertainty concerning the Queen's illness--for--if

her Majesty parts cable, there will be no Forest Ball, and

that is a terrible prospect. On Wednesday (when no post

arrives from London) Lord Melville chanced to receive a

letter with a black seal by express, and as it was of course

argued to contain the expected intelligence of poor

Charlotte, it sold a good many ells of black cloth and

stuffs before it was ascertained to contain no such

information. Surely this came within the line of high

treason, being an imagining of the Queen's death.

Ever yours truly,

Walter SCOTT.

P. S.--Once more _anent_ the colts. I am indifferent about

color; but, _cæteris paribus_, would prefer black or brown,

to bright bay or gray. I mention two off--as {p.273} the

age at which they can be best judged of by the buyer.

Of the same date I find written in pencil, on what must have been the

envelope of some sheriff's-process, this note, addressed to Mr.

Charles Erskine, the Sheriff-Substitute of Selkirkshire:--

September 10, 1818.

DEAR CHARLES,--I have read these papers with all attention

this morning--but think you will agree with me that there

must be an Eke to the Condescendence. Order the Eke against

next day.--Tom leaves with this packet a blackcock, and

(more's the pity) a gray hen. Yours,

W. S.

And again he thus writes by post to James Ballantyne:

ABBOTSFORD, September 10, 1818.

DEAR JAMES,--I am quite satisfied with what has been done as

to the London bills. I am glad the presses move. I have been

interrupted sadly since my return by tourist gazers. This

day a confounded pair of Cambridge boys have robbed me of

two good hours, and you of a sheet of copy--though whether a

good sheet or no, deponent saith not. The story is a dismal

one, and I doubt sometimes whether it will bear working out

to much length after all. Query, if I shall make it so

effective in two volumes as my mother does in her quarter of

an hour's crack by the fireside? But _nil desperandum_. You

shall have a bunch to-morrow or next day--and when the

proofs come in, my pen must and shall step out. By the bye,

I want a supply of pens--and ditto of ink. Adieu for the

present, for I must go over to Toftfield, to give orders

_anent_ the dam and the footpath, and see _item_ as to what

should be done _anent_ steps at the Rhymer's Waterfall,

which I think may be made to turn out a decent bit of a

linn, as would set True Thomas his worth and dignity. Ever

yours,

W. S.

{p.274} It must, I think, be allowed that these careless scraps, when

combined, give a curious picture of the man who was brooding over the

first chapters of The Bride of Lammermoor. One of his visitors of that

month was Mr. R. Cadell, who was of course in all the secrets of the

house of Constable; and observing how his host was harassed with

lion-hunters, and what a number of hours he spent daily in the company

of his work-people, he expressed, during one of their walks, his

wonder that Scott should ever be able to write books at all while in

the country. "I know," he said, "that you contrive to get a few hours

in your own room, and that may do for the mere pen-work; but when is

it that you think?" "Oh," said Scott, "I lie _simmering_ over things

for an hour or so before I get up--and there's the time I am dressing

to overhaul my half-sleeping, half-waking _projet de chapitre_--and

when I get the paper before me, it commonly runs off pretty

easily.--Besides, I often take a doze in the plantations, and while

Tom marks out a dyke or a drain as I have directed, one's fancy may be

running its ain riggs in some other world."

It was in the month following that I first saw Abbotsford. He invited

my friend John Wilson (now Professor of Moral Philosophy at Edinburgh)

and myself to visit him for a day or two on our return from an

excursion to Mr. Wilson's beautiful villa on the Lake of Windermere,

but named the particular day (October 8) on which it would be most

convenient for him to receive us; and we discovered on our arrival

that he had fixed it from a good-natured motive. We found him walking

in one of his plantations, at no great distance from the house, with

five or six young people, and his friends Lord Melville and Captain

Ferguson. Having presented us to the First Lord of the Admiralty, he

fell back a little and said, "I am glad you came to-day, for I thought

it might be of use to you both, some time or other, to be known to my

old schoolfellow here, who is, and I hope {p.275} will long continue

to be, the great giver of good things in the Parliament House. I trust

you have had enough of certain pranks with your friend Ebony, and if

so, Lord Melville will have too much sense to remember them."[115] We

then walked round the plantation, as yet in a very young state, and

came back to the house by a formidable work which he was constructing

for the defence of his _haugh_ against the wintry violences of the

Tweed; and he discoursed for some time with keen interest upon the

comparative merits of different methods of embankment, but stopped now

and then to give us the advantage of any point of view in which his

new building on the eminence above pleased his eye. It had a fantastic

appearance--being but a fragment of the existing edifice--and not at

all harmonizing in its outline with "Mother Retford's" original

tenement to the eastward. Scott, however, expatiated _con amore_ on

the rapidity with which, being chiefly of darkish granite, it was

assuming a "time-honored" aspect. Ferguson, with a grave and

respectful look, observed, "Yes, it really has much the air of some

old fastness hard by the river Jordan." This allusion to the Chaldee

MS., already quoted, in the manufacture of which Ferguson fancied

Wilson and myself to have had a share, gave rise to a burst of

laughter among Scott's merry young folks and their companions, while

he himself drew in his nether lip, and rebuked the Captain with

"Toots, Adam! toots, Adam!" He then returned to his embankment, and

described how a former one had been entirely swept away in one night's

flood. But the Captain was ready with another verse of the Chaldee

MS., and groaned out, by way of echo, "Verily my fine gold hath

perished!" Whereupon the "Great Magician" elevated his huge oaken

staff as if to {p.276} lay it on the waggish soldier's back--but

flourished it gayly over his own head, and laughed louder than the

youngest of the company. As we walked and talked, the Pepper and

Mustard terriers kept snuffing about among the bushes and heather near

us, and started every five minutes a hare, which scudded away before

them and the ponderous staghound Maida--the Sheriff and all his tail

hollowing and cheering, in perfect confidence that the dogs could do

no more harm to poor puss than the venerable tom-cat, Hinse of

Hinsfeldt, who pursued the vain chase with the rest.

[Footnote 115: _Ebony_ was Mr. Blackwood's own usual

designation in the _jeux d'esprit_ of his young

Magazine, in many of which the persons thus addressed by

Scott were conjoint culprits. They both were then, as

may be inferred, sweeping the boards of the Parliament

House as "briefless barristers."]

At length we drew near _Peterhouse_, and found sober Peter himself,

and his brother-in-law, the facetious factotum Tom Purdie,

superintending, pipe in mouth, three or four sturdy laborers busy in

laying down the turf for a bowling-green. "I have planted hollies all

round it, you see," said Scott, "and laid out an arbor on the

right-hand side for the laird; and here I mean to have a game at bowls

after dinner every day in fine weather--for I take that to have been

among the indispensables of our old _vie de château_." But I must not

forget the reason he gave me some time afterwards for having fixed on

that spot for his bowling-green. "In truth," he then said, "I wished

to have a smooth walk, and a canny seat for myself within ear-shot of

Peter's evening psalm." The coachman was a devout Presbyterian, and

many a time have I in after-years accompanied Scott on his evening

stroll, when the principal object was to enjoy, from the

bowling-green, the unfailing melody of this good man's family

worship--and heard him repeat, as Peter's manly voice led the humble

choir within, that beautiful stanza of Burns's Saturday Night:--

"They chaunt their artless notes in simple guise;

They tune their hearts, by far the noblest aim," etc.

It was near the dinner-hour before we reached the house, and presently

I saw assembled a larger company than I should have fancied to be at

all compatible with {p.277} the existing accommodations of the place;

but it turned out that Captain Ferguson, and the friends whom I have

not as yet mentioned, were to find quarters elsewhere for the night.

His younger brother, Captain John Ferguson of the Royal Navy (a

favorite lieutenant of Lord Nelson's), had come over from Huntly Burn;

there were present, also, Mr. Scott of Gala, whose residence is within

an easy distance; Sir Henry Hay Macdougal of Mackerstoun, an old

baronet, with gay, lively, and highly polished manners, related in the

same degree to both Gala and the Sheriff; Sir Alexander Don, the

member for Roxburghshire, whose elegant social qualities have been

alluded to in the preceding chapter; and Dr. Scott of Darnlee, a

modest and intelligent gentleman, who having realized a fortune in the

East India Company's medical service, had settled within two or three

miles of Abbotsford, and, though no longer practising his profession,

had kindly employed all the resources of his skill in the endeavor to

counteract his neighbor's recent liability to attacks of cramp. Our

host and one or two others appeared, as was in those days a common

fashion with country gentlemen, in the lieutenancy uniform of their

county. How fourteen or fifteen people contrived to be seated in the

then dining-room of Abbotsford I know not--for it seemed quite full

enough when it contained only eight or ten; but so it was--nor, as Sir

Harry Macdougal's fat valet, warned by former experience, did not join

the train of attendants, was there any perceptible difficulty in the

detail of the arrangements. Everything about the dinner was, as

the phrase runs, in excellent style; and in particular the _potage

à la Meg Merrilies_, announced as an attempt to imitate a device

of the Duke of Buccleuch's celebrated cook,--by name Monsieur

Florence,--seemed, to those at least who were better acquainted with

the Kaim of Derncleugh than with the _cuisine_ of Bowhill,[116] a very

laudable specimen of the art. {p.278} The champagne circulated

nimbly--and I never was present at a gayer dinner. It had advanced a

little beyond the soup when it received an accompaniment which would

not, perhaps, have improved the satisfaction of southern guests, had

any such been present. A tall and stalwart bagpiper, in complete

Highland costume, appeared pacing to and fro on the green before the

house, and the window being open, it seemed as if he might as well

have been straining his lungs within the parlor. At a pause of his

strenuous performance, Scott took occasion to explain that _John of

Skye_ was a recent acquisition to the rising hamlet of Abbotstown;

that the man was a capital hedger and ditcher, and only figured with

the pipe and philabeg on high occasions in the after-part of the day;

"but indeed," he added, laughing, "I fear John will soon be

discovering that the hook and mattock are unfavorable to his chanter

hand." When the cloth was drawn, and the never-failing salver of

_quaighs_ introduced, John of Skye, upon some well-known signal,

entered the room, but _en militaire_, without removing his bonnet, and

taking his station behind the landlord, received from his hand the

largest of the Celtic bickers brimful of Glenlivet. The man saluted

the company in his own dialect, tipped off the contents (probably a

quarter of an English pint of raw aqua vitæ) at a gulp, wheeled about

as solemnly as if the whole ceremony had been a movement on parade,

and forthwith recommenced his pibrochs and gatherings, which continued

until long after the ladies had left the table, and the autumnal moon

was streaming in upon us so brightly as to dim the candles.

[Footnote 116: I understand that this now celebrated

soup was _extemporized_ by M. Florence on Scott's first

visit to Bowhill after the publication of _Guy

Mannering_. Florence had _served_--and Scott having on

some sporting party made his personal acquaintance, he

used often afterwards to gratify the poet's military

propensities by sending up magnificent representations

in pastry, of citadels taken by the Emperor, etc.]

I had never before seen Scott in such buoyant spirits as he showed

this evening--and I never saw him in {p.279} higher afterwards; and

no wonder, for this was the first time that he, Lord Melville, and

Adam Ferguson, daily companions at the High School of Edinburgh, and

partners in many joyous scenes of the early volunteer period, had met

since the commencement of what I may call the serious part of any of

their lives. The great poet and novelist was receiving them under his

own roof, when his fame was at its _acme_, and his fortune seemed

culminating to about a corresponding height--and the generous

exuberance of his hilarity might have overflowed without moving the

spleen of a Cynic. Old stories of _the Yards_ and _the Cross-causeway_

were relieved by sketches of real warfare, such as none but Ferguson

(or Charles Mathews, had he been a soldier) could ever have given; and

they toasted the memory of _Green-breeks_ and the health of _the Beau_

with equal devotion.

When we rose from table, Scott proposed that we should all ascend his

western turret, to enjoy a moonlight view of the valley. The younger

part of his company were too happy to do so: some of the seniors, who

had tried the thing before, found pretexts for hanging back. The

stairs were dark, narrow, and steep; but the Sheriff piloted the way,

and at length there were as many on the top as it could well afford

footing for. Nothing could be more lovely than the panorama; all the

harsher and more naked features being lost in the delicious moonlight;

the Tweed and the Gala winding and sparkling beneath our feet; and the

distant ruins of Melrose appearing, as if carved of alabaster, under

the black mass of the Eildons. The poet, leaning on his battlement,

seemed to hang over the beautiful vision as if he had never seen it

before. "If I live," he exclaimed, "I will build me a higher tower,

with a more spacious platform, and a staircase better fitted for an

old fellow's scrambling." The piper was heard re-tuning his instrument

below, and he called to him for Lochaber no More. John of Skye obeyed,

and as the music rose, softened by {p.280} the distance, Scott

repeated in a low key the melancholy words of the song of exile.

On descending from the tower, the whole company were assembled in the

new dining-room, which was still under the hands of the carpenters,

but had been brilliantly illuminated for the occasion. Mr. Bruce took

his station, and old and young danced reels to his melodious

accompaniment until they were weary, while Scott and the Dominie

looked on with gladsome faces, and beat time now and then, the one

with his staff, the other with his wooden leg. A tray with mulled wine

and whiskey punch was then introduced, and Lord Melville proposed a

bumper, with all the honors, to the _Roof-tree_. Captain Ferguson

having sung Johnnie Cope, called on the young ladies for Kenmure's On

and Awa'; and our host then insisted that the whole party should join,

standing in a circle hand-in-hand _more majorum_, in the hearty chorus

of

"Weel may we a' be,

Ill may we never see,

God bless the king and the gude companie!"

--which being duly performed, all dispersed. Such was _the handsel_

(for Scott protested against its being considered as _the

house-heating_) of the new Abbotsford.

When I began this chapter, I thought it would be a short one, but it

is surprising how, when one digs into his memory, the smallest details

of a scene that was interesting at the time, shall by degrees come to

light again. I now recall, as if I had seen and heard them yesterday,

the looks and words of eighteen years ago. Awakening between six and

seven next morning, I heard Scott's voice close to me, and looking out

of the little latticed window of the then detached cottage called _the

chapel_, saw him and Tom Purdie pacing together on the green before

the door, in earnest deliberation over what seemed to be a rude daub

of a drawing; and every time they approached my end of their parade, I

was sure to {p.281} catch the words _Blue Bank_. It turned out in the

course of the day, that a field of clay near Toftfield went by this

name, and that the draining of it was one of the chief operations then

in hand. My friend Wilson meanwhile, who lodged also in the chapel,

tapped at my door, and asked me to rise and take a walk with him by

the river, for he had some angling project in his head. He went out

and joined in the consultation about the Blue Bank, while I was

dressing; presently Scott hailed me at the casement, and said he had

observed a volume of a new edition of Goethe on my table--would I lend

it him for a little? He carried off the volume accordingly, and

retreated with it to his den. It contained the Faust, and, I believe,

in a more complete shape than he had before seen that masterpiece of

his old favorite. When we met at breakfast, a couple of hours after,

he was full of the poem--dwelt with enthusiasm on the airy beauty of

its lyrics, the terrible pathos of the scene before the _Mater

Dolorosa_, and the deep skill shown in the various subtle shadings of

character between Mephistopheles and poor Margaret. He remarked,

however, of the Introduction (which I suspect was new to him), that

blood would out--that, consummate artist as he was, Goethe was a

German, and that nobody but a German would ever have provoked a

comparison with the Book of Job, "the grandest poem that ever was

written." He added, that he suspected the end of the story had been

left _in obscuro_, from despair to match the closing scene of our own

Marlowe's Doctor Faustus. Mr. Wilson mentioned a report that Coleridge

was engaged on a translation of the Faust. "I hope it is so," said

Scott; "Coleridge made Schiller's Wallenstein far finer than he found

it, and so he will do by this. No man has all the resources of poetry

in such profusion, but he cannot manage them so as to bring out

anything of his own on a large scale at all worthy of his genius. He

is like a lump of coal rich with gas, which lies expending itself in

puffs and {p.282} gleams, unless some shrewd body will clap it into a

cast-iron box, and compel the compressed element to do itself justice.

His fancy and diction would have long ago placed him above all his

contemporaries, had they been under the direction of a sound judgment

and a steady will.[117] I don't now expect a great original poem from

Coleridge, but he might easily make a sort of fame for himself as a

poetical translator,--that would be a thing completely unique and _sui

generis_."

[Footnote 117: In the Introduction to _The Lay of the

Last Minstrel_, 1830, Sir Walter says: "Were I ever to

take the unbecoming freedom of censuring a man of Mr.

Coleridge's extraordinary talents, it would be on

account of the caprice and indolence with which he has

thrown from him, as in mere wantonness, those unfinished

scraps of poetry, which, like the Torso of antiquity,

defy the skill of his poetical brethren to complete

them. The charming fragments which the author abandons

to their fate are surely too valuable to be treated like

the proofs of careless engravers, the sweepings of whose

studios often make the fortune of some painstaking

collector." And in a note to _The Abbot_, alluding to

Coleridge's beautiful and tantalizing fragment of

_Christabel_, he adds: "Has not our own imaginative poet

cause to fear that future ages will desire to summon him

from his place of rest, as Milton longed

'To call up him who left half told

The story of Cambuscan bold'?"]

While this criticism proceeded, Scott was cutting away at his brown

loaf and a plate of kippered salmon, in a style which strongly

reminded me of Dandie Dinmont's luncheon at Mump's Hall; nor was his

German topic at all the predominant one. On the contrary, the

sentences which have dwelt on my memory dropt from him now and then,

in the pauses, as it were, of his main talk;--for though he could not

help recurring, ever and anon, to the subject, it would have been

quite out of his way to make any literary matter the chief theme of

his conversation, when there was a single person present who was not

likely to feel much interested in its discussion.--How often have I

heard him quote on such occasions Mr. Vellum's advice to the butler in

Addison's excellent play of The Drummer: "Your conjuror, John, is

indeed a twofold personage--but he _eats and drinks like other

people_!"

{p.283} I may, however, take this opportunity of observing, that

nothing could have been more absurdly unfounded than the statement

which I have seen repeated in various sketches of his Life and

Manners, that he habitually abstained from conversation on literary

topics. In point of fact, there were no topics on which he talked more

openly or more earnestly; but he, when in society, lived and talked

for the persons with whom he found himself surrounded, and if he did

not always choose to enlarge upon the subjects which his companions

for the time suggested, it was simply because he thought or fancied

that these had selected, out of deference or flattery, subjects about

which they really cared little more than they knew. I have already

repeated, over and again, my conviction that Scott considered

literature, _per se_, as a thing of far inferior importance to the

high concerns of political or practical life; but it would be too

ridiculous to question that literature nevertheless engrossed, at all

times and seasons, the greater part of his own interest and

reflection: nor can it be doubted that his general preference of the

society of men engaged in the active business of the world, rather

than that of, so-called, literary people, was grounded substantially

on his feeling that literature, worthy of the name, was more likely to

be fed and nourished by the converse of the former than by that of the

latter class.

Before breakfast was over, the post-bag arrived, and its contents were

so numerous, that Lord Melville asked Scott what election was on

hand--not doubting that there must be some very particular reason for

such a shoal of letters. He answered that it was much the same most

days, and added, "though no one has kinder friends in the franking

line, and though Freeling and Croker especially are always ready to

stretch the point of privilege in my favor, I am nevertheless a fair

contributor to the revenue, for I think my bill for letters seldom

comes under £150 a year; and as to coach-parcels, they {p.284} are a

perfect ruination." He then told with high merriment a disaster that

had lately befallen him. "One morning last spring," he said, "I opened

a huge lump of a despatch, without looking how it was addressed, never

doubting that it had travelled under some omnipotent frank like the

First Lord of the Admiralty's, when, lo and behold, the contents

proved to be a MS. play, by a young lady of New York, who kindly

requested me to read and correct it, equip it with prologue and

epilogue, procure for it a favorable reception from the manager of

Drury Lane, and make Murray or Constable bleed handsomely for the

copyright; and on inspecting the cover, I found that I had been

charged five pounds odd for the postage. This was bad enough--but

there was no help, so I groaned and submitted. A fortnight or so

after, another packet, of not less formidable bulk, arrived, and I was

absent enough to break its seal, too, without examination. Conceive my

horror when out jumped the same identical tragedy of The Cherokee

Lovers, with a second epistle from the authoress, stating that, as the

winds had been boisterous, she feared the vessel entrusted with her

former communication might have foundered, and therefore judged it

prudent to forward a duplicate."

Scott said he must retire to answer his letters, but that the sociable

and the ponies would be at the door by one o'clock, when he proposed

to show Melrose and Dryburgh to Lady Melville and any of the rest of

the party that chose to accompany them; adding that his son Walter

would lead anybody who preferred a gun to the likeliest place for a

blackcock, and that Charlie Purdie (Tom's brother) would attend upon

Mr. Wilson, and whoever else chose to try a cast of the salmon-rod. He

withdrew when all this was arranged, and appeared at the time

appointed, with perhaps a dozen letters sealed for the post, and a

coach-parcel addressed to James Ballantyne, which he dropt at the

turnpike-gate as we drove to Melrose. Seeing it picked up by a dirty

urchin, and carried {p.285} into a hedge pot-house, where

half-a-dozen nondescript wayfarers were smoking and tippling, I could

not but wonder that it had not been the fate of some one of those

innumerable packets to fall into unscrupulous hands, and betray the

grand secret. That very morning we had seen two post-chaises drawn up

at his gate, and the enthusiastic travellers, seemingly decent

tradesmen and their families, who must have been packed in a manner

worthy of Mrs. Gilpin, lounging about to catch a glimpse of him at his

going forth. But it was impossible in those days to pass between

Melrose and Abbotsford without encountering some odd figure, armed

with a sketch-book, evidently bent on a peep at the Great Unknown; and

it must be allowed that many of these pedestrians looked as if they

might have thought it very excusable to make prize, by hook or by

crook, of a MS. chapter of the Tales of my Landlord.

Scott showed us the ruins of Melrose in detail; and as we proceeded to

Dryburgh, descanted learnedly and sagaciously on the good effects

which must have attended the erection of so many great monastic

establishments in a district so peculiarly exposed to the inroads of

the English in the days of the Border wars. "They were now and then

violated," he said, "as their aspect to this hour bears witness; but

for once that they suffered, any lay property similarly situated must

have been _harried_ a dozen times. The bold Dacres, Liddells, and

Howards, that could get easy absolution at York or Durham for any

ordinary breach of a truce with the Scots, would have had _to dree a

heavy dole_ had they confessed plundering from the fat brothers, of

the same order perhaps, whose lines had fallen to them on the wrong

side of the Cheviot." He enlarged, too, on the heavy penalty which the

Crown of Scotland had paid for its rash acquiescence in the wholesale

robbery of the Church at the Reformation. "The proportion of the soil

in the hands of the clergy had," he said, "been very great--too great

to be {p.286} continued. If we may judge by their share in the public

burdens, they must have had nearly a third of the land in their

possession. But this vast wealth was now distributed among a turbulent

nobility, too powerful before; and the Stuarts soon found, that in the

bishops and lord abbots they had lost the only means of balancing

their factions, so as to turn the scale in favor of law and order; and

by and by the haughty barons themselves, who had scrambled for the

worldly spoil of the church, found that the spiritual influence had

been concentrated in hands as haughty as their own, and connected with

no feelings likely to buttress their order any more than the Crown--a

new and sterner monkery, under a different name, and essentially

plebeian. Presently the Scotch were on the verge of republicanism, in

state as well as kirk, and I have sometimes thought it was only the

accession of King Jamie to the throne of England that could have given

monarchy a chance of prolonging its existence here." One of his

friends asked what he supposed might have been the annual revenue of

the abbey of Melrose in its best day. He answered that he suspected,

if all the sources of their income were now in clever hands, the

produce could hardly be under £100,000 a year; and added: "Making

every allowance for modern improvements, there can be no question that

the sixty brothers of Melrose divided a princely rental. The superiors

were often men of very high birth, and the great majority of the rest

were younger brothers of gentlemen's families. I fancy they may have

been, on the whole, pretty near akin to your Fellows of All

Souls--who, according to their statute, must be _bene nati, bene

vestiti, et mediocriter docti_. They had a good house in Edinburgh,

where, no doubt, my lord abbot and his chaplains maintained a

hospitable table during the sittings of Parliament." Some one

regretted that we had no lively picture of the enormous revolution in

manners that must have followed the downfall of the ancient Church in

{p.287} Scotland. He observed that there were, he fancied, materials

enough for constructing such a one, but that they were mostly

scattered in records--"of which," said he, "who knows anything to the

purpose except Tom Thomson and John Riddell? It is common to laugh at

such researches, but they pay the good brains that meddle with

them;--and had Thomson been as diligent in setting down his

discoveries as he has been in making them, he might, long before this

time of day, have placed himself on a level with Ducange or Camden.

The change in the country-side," he continued, "must indeed have been

terrific; but it does not seem to have been felt very severely by a

certain Boniface of St. Andrews, for when somebody asked him, on the

subsidence of the storm, what he thought of all that had

occurred,--'Why,' answered mine host, 'it comes to this, that the

moder_au_tor sits in my meikle chair, where the dean sat before, and

in place of calling for the third stoup of Bordeaux, bids Jenny bring

ben anither bowl of toddy.'"

At Dryburgh, Scott pointed out to us the sepulchral aisle of his

Haliburton ancestors, and said he hoped, in God's appointed time, to

lay his bones among their dust. The spot was, even then, a

sufficiently interesting and impressive one; but I shall not say more

of it at present.

On returning to Abbotsford, we found Mrs. Scott and her daughters

doing penance under the merciless curiosity of a couple of tourists

who had arrived from Selkirk soon after we set out for Melrose. They

were rich specimens--tall, lanky young men, both of them rigged out in

new jackets and trousers of the Macgregor tartan; the one, as they had

revealed, being a lawyer, the other a Unitarian preacher, from New

England. These gentlemen, when told on their arrival that Mr. Scott

was not at home, had shown such signs of impatience, that the servant

took it for granted they must have serious business, and asked if they

would wish to speak a word with his {p.288} lady. They grasped at

this, and so conducted themselves in the interview, that Mrs. Scott

never doubted they had brought letters of introduction to her husband,

and invited them accordingly to partake of her luncheon. They had been

walking about the house and grounds with her and her daughters ever

since that time, and appeared at the porch, when the Sheriff and his

party returned to dinner, as if they had been already fairly enrolled

on his visiting list. For the moment, he too was taken in--he fancied

that his wife must have received and opened their credentials--and

shook hands with them with courteous cordiality. But Mrs. Scott, with

all her overflowing good-nature, was a sharp observer; and she, before

a minute had elapsed, interrupted the ecstatic compliments of the

strangers, by reminding them that her husband would be glad to have

the letters of the friends who had been so good as to write by them.

It then turned out that there were no letters to be produced--and

Scott, signifying that his hour for dinner approached, added, that as

he supposed they meant to walk to Melrose, he could not trespass

further on their time. The two lion-hunters seemed quite unprepared

for this abrupt escape. But there was about Scott, in perfection, when

he chose to exert it, the power of civil repulsion; he bowed the

overwhelmed originals to his door, and on reëntering the parlor, found

Mrs. Scott complaining very indignantly that they had gone so far as

to pull out their note-book, and beg an exact account, not only of his

age--but of her own. Scott, already half relenting, laughed heartily

at this misery. He observed, however, that, "if he were to take in all

the world, he had better put up a sign-post at once,--

'Porter, ale, and British spirits,

Painted bright between twa trees;'[118]

and that no traveller of respectability could ever be at a loss for

such an introduction as would insure his best {p.289} hospitality."

Still he was not quite pleased with what had happened--and as we were

about to pass, half an hour afterwards, from the drawing-room to the

dining-room, he said to his wife, "Hang the Yahoos, Charlotte--but we

should have bid them stay dinner." "Devil a bit," quoth Captain John

Ferguson, who had again come over from Huntly Burn, and had been

latterly assisting the lady to amuse her Americans, "Devil a bit, my

dear,--they were quite in a mistake, I could see. The one asked Madame

whether she deigned to call her new house Tully-Veolan or

Tillietudlem; and the other, when Maida happened to lay his nose

against the window, exclaimed _pro-di-gi-ous_! In short, they

evidently meant all their humbug not for you, but for the culprit of

Waverley, and the rest of that there rubbish." "Well, well, Skipper,"

was the reply, "for a' that, the loons would hae been nane the waur o'

their kail."

[Footnote 118: Macneill's _Will and Jean_.]

From this banter it may be inferred that the younger Ferguson had not

as yet been told the Waverley secret--which to any of that house could

never have been any mystery. Probably this, or some similar occasion

soon afterwards, led to his formal initiation; for during the many

subsequent years that the veil was kept on, I used to admire the tact

with which, when in their topmost high-jinks humor, both "Captain

John" and "The Auld Captain" eschewed any the most distant allusion to

the affair.

And this reminds me, that at the period of which I am writing, none of

Scott's own family, except of course his wife, had the advantage in

that matter of the Skipper. Some of them, too, were apt, like him, so

long as no regular confidence had been reposed in them, to avail

themselves of the author's reserve for their own sport among friends.

Thus one morning, just as Scott was opening the door of the parlor,

the rest of the party being already seated at the breakfast-table, the

Dominie was in the act of helping himself to an egg, marked with

{p.290} a peculiar hieroglyphic by Mrs. Thomas Purdie, upon which

Anne Scott, then a lively rattling girl of sixteen, lisped out,

"That's a mysterious-looking egg, Mr. Thomson--what if it should have

been meant for _the Great Unknown_?" Ere the Dominie could reply, her

father advanced to the foot of the table, and having seated himself

and deposited his stick on the carpet beside him, with a sort of

whispered whistle--"What's that Lady Anne's[119] saying?" quoth he; "I

thought it had been well known that the _keelavined_ egg must be a

soft one for _the Sherra_." And so he took his egg, and while all

smiled in silence, poor Anne said gayly, in the midst of her blushes,

"Upon my word, papa, I thought Mr. John Ballantyne might have been

expected." This allusion to Johnny's glory in being considered as the

accredited representative of Jedediah Cleishbotham produced a

laugh,--at which the Sheriff frowned--and then laughed too.

[Footnote 119: When playing, in childhood, with the

young ladies of the Buccleuch family, she had been

overheard saying to her namesake Lady Anne Scott, "Well,

I do wish I were Lady Anne too--it is so much prettier

than Miss;" thenceforth she was commonly addressed in

the family by the coveted title.]

I remember nothing particular about our second day's dinner, except

that it was then I first met my dear and honored friend William

Laidlaw. The evening passed rather more quietly than the preceding

one. Instead of the dance in the new dining-room, we had a succession

of old ballads sung to the harp and guitar by the young ladies of the

house; and Scott, when they seemed to have done enough, found some

reason for taking down a volume of Crabbe, and read us one of his

favorite tales,--

"Grave Jonas Kindred, Sibyl Kindred's sire,

Was six feet high, and looked six inches higher," etc.

But jollity revived in full vigor when the supper-tray was introduced;

and to cap all merriment, Captain Ferguson dismissed us with The Laird

of Cockpen. Lord and Lady Melville were to return to Melville Castle

next {p.291} morning, and Mr. Wilson and I happened to mention that

we were engaged to dine and sleep at the seat of my friend and

relation, Mr. Pringle of Torwoodlee, on our way to Edinburgh. Scott

immediately said that he would send word in the morning to the Laird,

that he and Adam Ferguson meant to accompany us--such being the

unceremonious style in which country neighbors in Scotland visit each

other. Next day, accordingly, we all rode over together to Mr.

Pringle's beautiful seat--the "distant Torwoodlee" of The Lay of the

Last Minstrel, but distant not above five or six miles from

Abbotsford--coursing hares as we proceeded, but inspecting the

antiquities of the _Catrail_ to the interruption of our sport. We had

another joyous evening at Torwoodlee. Scott and Ferguson returned home

at night, and the morning after, as Wilson and I mounted for

Edinburgh, our kind old host, his sides still sore with laughter,

remarked that "the Sheriff and the Captain together were too much for

any company."

There was much talk between the Sheriff and Mr. Pringle about the

Selkirkshire Yeomanry Cavalry, of which the latter had been the

original commandant. Young Walter Scott had been for a year or more

Cornet in the corps, and his father was consulting Torwoodlee about an

entertainment which he meant to give them on his son's approaching

birthday. It was then that the new dining-room was to be first

_heated_ in good earnest; and Scott very kindly pressed Wilson and

myself, at parting, to return for the occasion--which, however, we

found it impossible to do. The reader must therefore be satisfied with

what is said about it in one of the following letters:--

TO J. B. S. MORRITT, ESQ., M. P., ROKEBY.

ABBOTSFORD, 5th November, 1818.

MY DEAR MORRITT,--Many thanks for your kind letter of 29th

October. The matter of the colts being as {p.292} you

state, I shall let it lie over until next year, and then

avail myself of your being in the neighborhood to get a good

pair of four-year-olds, since it would be unnecessary to buy

them a year younger, and incur all the risks of disease and

accident, unless they could have been had at a proportional

under-value.

* * * * * * leaves us this morning after a visit of about a

week. He improves on acquaintance, and especially seems so

pleased with everything, that it would be very hard to

quarrel with him. Certainly, as the Frenchman said, _il a un

grand talent pour le silence_. I take the opportunity of his

servant going direct to Rokeby to charge him with this

letter, and a plaid which my daughters entreat you to accept

of as a token of their _warm_ good wishes. Seriously you

will find it a good bosom friend in an easterly wind, a

black frost, or when your country avocations lead you to

face a _dry wap of snow_. I find it by far the lightest and

most comfortable integument which I can use upon such

occasions.

We had a grand jollification here last week;--the whole

troop of Forest Yeomanry dining with us. I assure you the

scene was gay and even grand, with glittering sabres, waving

standards, and screaming bagpipes; and that it might not

lack spectators of taste, who should arrive in the midst of

the hurricane, but Lord and Lady Compton, whose presence

gave a great zest to the whole affair. Everything went off

very well, and as cavalry have the great advantage over

infantry, that their _legs_ never get drunk, they retired in

decent disorder about ten o'clock. I was glad to see Lord

and Lady Compton so very comfortable, and surrounded with so

fine a family, the natural bond of mutual regard and

affection. She has got very jolly, but otherwise has

improved on her travels. I had a long chat with her, and was

happy to find her quite contented and pleased with the lot

she has drawn in life. It is a brilliant one in many

respects, to be sure; but still I have seen the story of the

poor {p.293} woman, who, after all rational subjects of

distress had been successively remedied, tormented herself

about the screaming of a neighbor's peacock--I say, I have

seen this so often realized in actual life, that I am more

afraid of my friends making themselves uncomfortable, who

have only imaginary evils to indulge, than I am for the

peace of those who, battling magnanimously with real

inconvenience and danger, find a remedy in the very force of

the exertions to which their lot compels them.

I sympathize with you for the _dole_ which you are _dreeing_

under the inflictions of your honest proser. Of all the

boring machines ever devised, your regular and determined

story-teller is the most peremptory and powerful in his

operations. This is a rainy day, and my present infliction

is an idle cousin, a great amateur of the pipes, who is

performing incessantly in the next room for the benefit of a

probationary minstrel, whose pipes scream _à la distance_,

as the young hoarse cock-chicken imitates the gallant and

triumphant screech of a veteran Sir Chanticleer. Yours

affectionately,

W. SCOTT.

{p.295} APPENDIX

THE DURHAM GARLAND

IN THREE PARTS

[The following is the _Garland_ referred to at pages 4 and 26, in

connection with the novel of Guy Mannering. The ballad was taken down

from the recitation of Mrs. Young of Castle-Douglas, who, as her

family informed Mr. Train, had long been in the habit of repeating it

over to them once in the year, in order that it might not escape from

her memory.]

PART I

1

A worthy Lord of birth and state,

Who did in Durham live of late--

But I will not declare his name,

By reason of his birth and fame.

2

This Lord he did a-hunting go;

If you the truth of all would know,

He had indeed a noble train,

Of Lords and Knights and Gentlemen.

3

This noble Lord he left the train

Of Lords and Knights and Gentlemen;

And hearing not the horn to blow,

He could not tell which way to go.

4

But he did wander to and fro,

Being weary, likewise full of woe:

At last Dame Fortune was so kind

That he the Keeper's house did find.

{p.296} 5

He went and knocked at the door,

He thought it was so late an hour.

The Forester did let him in,

And kindly entertained him.

6

About the middle of the night,

When as the stars did shine most bright,

This Lord was in a sad surprise,

Being wakened by a fearful noise.

7

Then he did rise and call with speed,

To know the reason then indeed,

Of all that shrieking and those cries

Which did disturb his weary eyes.

8

"I'm sorry, Sir," the Keeper said,

"That you should be so much afraid;

But I do hope all will be well,

For my wife she is in travail."

9

The noble Lord was learned and wise,

To know the Planets in the skies.

He saw one evil Planet reign,

He called the Forester again.

10

He gave him then to understand,

He'd have the Midwife hold her hand;

But he was answered by the maid,

"My Mistress is delivered."

11

At one o'clock that very morn,

A lovely infant there was born;

It was indeed a charming boy,

Which brought the man and wife much joy.

12

The Lord was generous, kind, and free,

And proffered Godfather to be;

The Goodman thanked him heartily

For his goodwill and courtesy.

{p.297} 13

A parson was sent for with speed,

For to baptize the child indeed;

And after that, as I heard say,

In mirth and joy they spent the day.

14

This Lord did noble presents give,

Which all the servants did receive.

They prayed God to enrich his store,

For they never had so much before.

15

And likewise to the child he gave

A present noble, rich, and brave;

It was a charming cabinet,

That was with pearls and jewels set.

16

And within it was a chain of gold,

Would dazzle eyes for to behold;

A richer gift, as I may say,

Was not beheld this many a day.

17

He charged his father faithfully,

That he himself would keep the key,

Until the child could write and read--

And then to give him it indeed;--

18

"Pray do not open it at all

Whatever should on you befall;

For it may do my godson good,

If it be rightly understood."

19

This Lord did not declare his name,

Nor yet the place from whence he came,

But secretly he did depart,

And left them grieved to the heart.

Memoirs of the Life of Sir Walter Scott, Volume 5 (of 10) · 第 1 / 3 章