CHAPTER XIII

SLIDING, ROLLING, WALKING, AND CREEPING

IN ALL forms of transportation friction plays a most important part. If

there were no such thing as friction, it would be impossible for us to

set an object in motion by the means that are now commonly in use, and

once the object were moving it would be impossible to stop it except by

bringing it up against a wall set squarely across its path.

In transportation on land friction is a much more serious bar to motion

than it is in marine or aerial transportation. There are two kinds

of friction that we have to contend with; sliding friction when two

contacting surfaces are dragged by each other; and rolling friction

when one surface rolls upon another. It is impossible to obtain two

surfaces that are absolutely smooth; there are minute elevations in

each that sink into minute depressions of the other like intermeshing

teeth and a grinding action takes place as these microscopic

inequalities are broken away. Oil reduces the friction by filling up

these inequalities, but the oil itself offers a certain amount of

friction just as water does along the sides of a moving ship.

ROLLING FRICTION

Rolling friction is of a different kind. The intermeshing inequalities

or microscopic teeth are lifted out of contact with, one another

just as the teeth of gear wheels are carried out of mesh. But there

is another cause of friction due to the fact that no objects are so

microscopic that they do not sink into each other to some extent. A

wheel is always rolling out the surface it is turning on just as a

rolling pin rolls out dough. If the surface is of elastic material

such as a steel rail, it springs back into place immediately after

the passage of the wheel, but the wheel must constantly travel in

the trough of a wave which accompanies it along the rail. There is a

similar wave in the wheel itself and this ironing-out action produces

heat in the wheel and the rail. It is particularly noticeable in the

flexible tires of automobiles which, after a run on even a smooth road,

become too hot to be grasped with the bare hand merely because of the

waves of compression and decompression to which they are subjected.

Both rolling and sliding friction are increased by pressure because

the depression is greater and because inequalities are brought into

more intimate engagement with one another. The degree of friction also

depends upon the nature of the substances in contact, but theoretically

the area of contact does not make any difference. It is just as hard to

push a block along a smooth surface on its edge as on its side.

PUTTING ROLLERS BETWEEN LOAD AND ROAD

As intimated in Chapter I the forerunner of the wheel was probably the

roller. It was much easier to move a heavy object on rollers because

rolling friction was substituted for sliding friction, but the rollers

would not stay under the object; they traveled only half as fast as

the load they carried. To make them keep up with the load they had to

be mounted on axles which were fastened either directly to the load or

to a cart body on which the load was supported. Thus the wheel came to

be invented, but except for the fact that it stays by its load and does

not roll out from under it a common wheel is not to be compared with a

roller for efficiency. To be sure, it substitutes rolling friction for

sliding friction where it contacts with the road, but the friction at

the axle is sliding rather than rolling. However, drawing an object on

wheels is a decided improvement over sliding it along the road, for two

reasons: the sliding friction at the axle is reduced to a minimum by

choosing materials that will slide upon each other with comparatively

little resistance, by polishing them smooth and by lubricating them.

But even if these precautions were not taken there would be a distinct

advantage in the use of wheels because of the relatively shorter travel

at the axle than at the rim of the wheel. If a wheel is thirty inches

in diameter and turns on an axle one inch in diameter, it will travel

thirty times as far at the rim as it does at the axle; hence the

sliding friction at the axle is far less than it would be at the point

of contact with the ground, were the wheel locked so that it could not

turn. But it is not necessary to have any sliding friction at the axle

if we revert to the old roller system that prevailed before the day of

the wheel. The axle may be considered the load and the axle bearing

the road. We can then put rollers between load and road. Because the

road is a circular one that travels with the load we can line it with

rollers throughout its length, and the load will never lack for rollers

to roll upon. Thus we have the roller bearing which is so widely

used in modern vehicles. Ball bearings operate on the same principle

except that the balls furnish less contacting surface and are not so

suitable for supporting heavy loads, as are rollers. Sliding friction

is almost completely eliminated and unless heavily loaded a wheel on

ball bearings will not heat even when the bearings are not lubricated.

REDUCING ROAD FRICTION

While there is little friction between a wheel and the roadway upon

which it travels, the roughness of the road is a very important factor.

Every time a wheel goes over a stone the entire vehicle must be lifted;

this represents so much wasted energy. The advantage of the pneumatic

tire lies in the fact that it absorbs small inequalities without making

it necessary for the entire vehicle to rise over them. This means less

load lifted and hence less work done. Large wheels are better than

small ones because they do not sink so deeply into depressions and

because they surmount small obstacles more readily. On a steel track

the size of the wheel does not make so much difference as it does on a

road because the track surface is smooth and is but little depressed

by the wheel. It has been estimated that a horse can pull ten times as

great a load on rails as on an ordinary macadamed road. Some years ago

broad steel tracks were laid in some of our city streets for the use of

horse-drawn trucks. They served very well as far as the vehicles were

concerned. The road friction was reduced considerably, but the fact

was overlooked that the horses needed a good friction surface under

their feet. Two horses could not pull a truck along the track without

walking on the track and the smooth steel made such slippery footing

that the tracks had to be torn out and replaced with common paving.

INCREASING TRACK FRICTION

The difference between sliding and rolling friction is well illustrated

in a locomotive. The driving wheels are turned around by steam power.

They must either roll or slide on the track and the load they will

pull without slipping is a measure of the excess of sliding friction

over rolling friction. To increase the traction or the adhesion of the

locomotive to the track it is provided with a number of driving wheels.

In some of our largest locomotives driving wheels are placed under the

tender so as to obtain a maximum of traction.

ANCIENT LINEAGE OF THE AUTOMOBILE

When it was first proposed to substitute steam propulsion for the horse

it was not realized that a rail would furnish enough traction to permit

of hauling heavy loads, and some of the early locomotives that ran on

rails were provided with toothed wheels that engaged in racks alongside

the rails. In fact, the earliest locomotives were not built to run on

rails but on ordinary roads; in other words, they were automobiles.

The motor car can therefore boast of a more ancient lineage than the

railroad engine. Joseph Cugnot of France is said to have built a

three-wheeled steam carriage in 1769 which was so top-heavy that it

upset when making a sharp turn at three miles per hour. Several steam

carriages were built in England in the eighteenth century, but they

were not successful. The real father of steam traction was Richard

Trevithic, of Camborne, Cornwall, whose first steam carriage, built

in 1801, carried eight passengers. His third machine, built in 1804,

was the first to run on rails. This was strictly a locomotive intended

to haul cars. It ran with its load at the astonishing speed of five

miles an hour. Trevithic was the first to exhaust the steam from the

cylinders into the smoke-stack and thereby increase the draft through

the furnace and generated steam at higher pressure.

All the early locomotives used toothed gears to turn the driving wheels

until George Stephenson introduced connecting rods to drive the driving

wheels direct from the pistons. George Stephenson’s “Rocket,” built in

1829, won a prize of 500 pounds in a speed contest when it established

a record of 24 1-6 miles per hour. It also established the doubtful

honor of being the first mechanical speed monster to exact the toll of

human life. On its prize run it ran over a man and killed him.

STEPHENSON’S LINK MOTION

[Illustration: FIG. 61.--STEPHENSON’S LINK MOTION]

Stephenson’s son Robert is commonly credited with the invention of

an ingenious link motion, although the invention is also claimed for

W. T. James of New York. We must pause a moment for a description of

this ingenious link motion, because it became a standard in locomotive

construction that is still in service. As explained in Chapter IX steam

should be used expansively in order to obtain a maximum of efficiency.

After a certain amount of steam has been admitted into the cylinder

it is cut off from the boiler and it pushes the piston by its own

expansion. The speed of the locomotive must be varied by varying the

point of cut-off, and the direction of motion of the locomotive is

reversed by reversing the motion of the valve. In the Stephenson link

motion this is all effected by the operation of a single lever. Fig.

61 shows the arrangement. The valve is moved back and forth by the

rod _A_ which is connected to the arm _B_ suspended from the frame of

the locomotive. The drive shaft is shown at _C_ and it carries two

eccentrics projecting on opposite sides of the shaft which move the

rods _D_ and _E_ back and forth. The outer ends of these rods are

connected to opposite ends of a curved link _F_ and a pin _G_ on the

arm _B_ engages a slot in the link. The link is held up by a rod _H_.

As the drive shaft rotates the slotted link is oscillated back and

forth on its own center. When the link is lowered so that the pin _G_

is at the center of the slot there is no motion of the valve rod _A_,

but when the pin is at the top or at the bottom of the slot the valve

rod has its greatest motion. As the top of the link is moving in one

direction while the bottom is moving in the other direction, it will

be plain that the action of the valve when _G_ is at the top of the

link will be the reverse of the action when _G_ is at the bottom. The

link is raised and lowered by means of a lever _I_ which is connected

to one arm of a T-shaped lever _J_ which on one side of its fulcrum is

connected to the rod _H_ and on the other to the counterweight _K_.

There are certain defects in the Stephenson link motion that we cannot

discuss here. These became serious as engines grew larger and more

powerful so that to-day it has been largely superseded by other valve

gears. The most important of these is the Walschaerts gear, invented by

a Belgian engineer. This gear, unlike Stephenson’s, is conspicuously

placed outside the drivers and is particularly noticeable because

of its peculiar grasshopper motion. The action of the gear is so

complicated that a description of it would be out of place in this book.

MODERN LOCOMOTIVES

We cannot enter minutely into the development of the locomotive from

the crude machine of Trevithic’s time to monsters of to-day. There has

been a progressive growth of locomotives in power and in speed. Our

biggest freight engines are so powerful that they cannot be used for

pulling alone because they can pull a greater load than the draw-bars

of the cars can stand. If placed at the head of a long train they would

yank the forward cars loose from the rest. Hence they are placed at the

rear of the train to act as pushers or in the middle of the train where

half their energy is expended in pushing the cars ahead of them and the

other half in pulling the rest of the train.

The most powerful steam locomotive of to-day (1921) weighs 342 tons and

its tender 107 making a total of 449 tons. Its length is 105 feet and

its boiler 8 feet 7⅛ inches in diameter. Its low pressure cylinders (4

feet in diameter) are larger than the locomotive boilers of 50 years

ago. Its high pressure cylinders are 30 inches in diameter and the

stroke is 32 inches. It may be operated either compound or simple, _i.

e._, the smaller cylinders may exhaust into the larger ones or they

may take steam direct from the boiler. The tractive effort compound

is 147,200 pounds and simple 176,600 pounds and the total horsepower

developed is 5,040. Each cylinder drives five coupled drivers, in other

words there are twenty power-driven wheels with a pair of trailers and

a pair of pilot wheels. Six and a half tons of coal are consumed per

hour.

In the matter of speed a mile per minute has become common and regular

scheduled runs over long distances at an average well above sixty miles

per hour have been maintained, but the present tendency is to reduce

speed somewhat in favor of safety.

There are two inventions that have made possible the high speeds

of modern railroad travel: the air brake, which has already been

described; and the block signal system. The latter, of which there are

a number of different types, being electrical, does not properly belong

in this book.

Stoking a large freight engine or a high speed passenger locomotive is

strenuous work. Three tons of coal per hour is not an uncommon rate of

consumption. The fireman on a fast express train gets little rest. To

relieve him of this exhaustive work automatic stokers are now being

used. These convey the coal from the tender to the fire box and feed

the fuel at a uniform rate. In place of solid fuel, oil is extensively

used in regions where it may readily be obtained. This simplifies

the task of firing the locomotives. There has also been some use of

powdered coal which is blown into the furnace in much the same way as

oil is.

To-day steam locomotives have found a serious competitor in the

electric locomotive, which is steadily increasing in favor.

Where traffic is heavy, where long tunnels make the smoke and gases

of a steam locomotive dangerous, where electric power is plentiful,

the steam locomotive must give place to electricity. As the cost of

coal mounts, the electrification of railroads will spread and it will

be only a matter of time before the electric locomotive, which is far

more economical in its use of power, will completely supplant the steam

locomotive.

FIRST AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENT

As we have already noted, the automobile antedated the railway

locomotive. It was an accident that took the primitive steam carriage

off the high roads and put it on rails. In 1802 Richard Trevithic,

while speeding along a road at the frightful speed of ten miles per

hour, lost control of his machine, ran into a fence and ripped off

a number of palings. That accident spelled the doom of the early

automobile. So dangerous a machine was not allowed to run at large.

Special tolls and restrictions were placed on power-driven road

vehicles. As late as 1896 when the automobile had become a practical

machine in France and was being rapidly developed in this country,

England still had a law prohibiting any power-propelled vehicle to

travel over the highways at a higher speed than four miles per hour

and required further that the vehicle be preceded by a man bearing a

red flag.

The most important early American road car was that built by Richard

Dudgeon in 1855, which made a record speed of forty miles per hour.

In 1889 Serpollet, in France, invented the flash boiler and interest

in steam-driven automobiles was revived. In a flash boiler water is

turned into steam as it is used by injecting small quantities at a time

in a red-hot tube. In the meantime, however, the internal combustion

engine was being developed. Lenoir, in France, was the first to build

a motor car driven by an internal combustion engine. He obtained a

patent on such a vehicle in 1860. However, the real father of the

modern automobile was Gottlieb Daimler of Germany, who patented a motor

vehicle in 1884 driven by an internal combustion engine. The next year

Karl Benz, another German, built an automobile.

AMERICAN PIONEERS OF THE MOTOR CAR

Pioneer work in this country began with Charles E. Duryea in 1891.

Five years later he took one of his machines to England, where it

entered a fifty-two-mile race between London and Brighton. There were

many entrants from France, Germany, and other European countries.

The American car won the race by nearly an hour over its nearest

competitor. Commercial building of automobiles began in America in

1894. However, it was not until the opening of the twentieth century

that America took hold of the motor car in real earnest. Since then the

rise of the automobile industry has been phenomenal. American methods

of manufacture were applied and cars were turned out in quantity.

In 1916 the annual production exceeded a million and to-day the

production is about two million passenger cars and over three hundred

thousand trucks. The motor car industry is largely responsible for the

wonderful progress in American machine tools that has been made in the

past two decades.

On the race track the motor car has established a record speed of 131

miles per hour, but of greater utility has been the motor truck which

now competes with railroads in the transportation of freight. Owing to

New York’s inadequate terminal facilities, it takes less time to haul

a load from New York to Philadelphia by motor truck than to take the

same load from the warehouse, transport it across the Hudson River, and

load it on a freight car. It has made the country a part of the city. A

short run brings the farmer’s produce to the markets and his passenger

car keeps him in close touch with city life. The motor tractor has

lightened his work on the farm and has enabled him to conduct farming

operations over vast areas. Animal power is gradually giving way to

mechanical power. This, however, is a special branch of automotive

engineering which we must look into.

WHEELS VS. LEGS

The success of the automobile depends upon the character of the roads

it has to traverse. Wheels provide the best form of transportation

over a smooth, hard road, but if the road is soft, the wheel will sink

into the surface and will be greatly impeded. In traveling over mud or

sand runners are preferable to wheels because they have a broader and

longer bearing surface. In the snowy regions of the north and the sandy

regions of Africa and Asia Minor, sledges are used in place of wheeled

vehicles. Sliding friction is less than rolling friction under such

conditions. In fact, only where man has constructed special roads is

it possible to use wheeled locomotion. It is because in nature we must

contend with all sorts of surface conditions, soft and hard and seldom

smooth, that the rolling principle of locomotion is not to be found

in any species of animal. The legs of an animal are levers, just as a

wheel is a system of levers, but in the former case the levers can be

folded or extended to adapt themselves to all the unevennesses of the

ground. No animal can begin to run as fast as an automobile on a good

road, but on the other hand we have yet to build a machine which will

run as fast as a horse on soft and uneven ground.

WALKING MACHINES

Farm operations must be conducted on loose and broken surfaces for

which the ordinary wheeled vehicle is unfitted. In some cases broad

wheels are used to keep them from sinking into the soil and they are

furnished with cleats so as to give them a good grip on the ground,

but long ago it was realized that if the horse was to be completely

displaced on the farm a more adaptable form of locomotion than that of

wheels must be furnished. Inventors sought to make machines that would

walk. One interesting machine of this class which met with a certain

degree of success attempted to combine walking and rolling. Large

wheels were used which were provided with a series of feet or tread

plates connected by knuckle joints to the wheel rims. As the wheels

revolved, these treads came successively into contact with the ground

and the machine actually walked on its feet. The feet were broad

enough to prevent the machine from sinking into the ground and they

adapted themselves to inequalities in the surface. Instead of having to

roll over a rock that lay in its path the machine would plant its feet

on the rock and lift itself over.

A very curious machine of the walking type has been developed for

excavating machines that operate in soft swampy ground. The machine

actually walks over surfaces that a light carriage could not negotiate.

It consists of a large central turntable flanked on each side by a pair

of broad and long tread plates which serve as feet. When the dredge is

to be moved, it plants the feet on the ground, lifts up the turntable,

moves it forward, and sets it down again; then the feet are lifted,

moved forward, and planted on the ground again while the turntable is

moved forward again. When it is desired to make a turn the machine is

swiveled around to the desired direction while sitting on the turntable

with its feet raised clear of the ground. Of course the speed of such a

machine is very low, but transportation is of secondary consideration.

The main purpose of the machine is to excavate ditches in soft ground

and only occasionally does it have to move its position. The turntable

provides a broad base that distributes the load over a comparatively

large area which prevents the machine from sinking into the mud, and if

it should sink into a soft spot it lifts itself out vertically instead

of having to roll out.

“CATERPILLAR” TRACTION

Long ago it occurred to inventors that a machine could travel over

trackless wastes if they carried their own tracks with them. The idea

dates back more than a century, but only in comparatively recent times

has it been developed to a practical stage. The track-laying mechanism

takes different forms, but in one prominent type it consists of a

series of plates linked together to form a chain or belt that passes

around a series of wheels. As the machine progresses the plates are

successively laid down in front of the wheels and picked up behind

them. The wheels consist of a large number of rollers whose axles

are spring-supported so that they are capable of a certain amount of

vertical movement and as the belt they roll upon is made up of separate

plates they can adjust themselves to irregularities of the ground and

creep over an uneven surface. Its close resemblance to the creeping

locomotion of a caterpillar has led to the adoption of the trade name

“caterpillar” by one of the large tractor manufacturers. The tractor

belt is driven by spur wheels at each end and the rollers serve merely

to distribute the weight of the machine along the belt. The traction is

exceedingly great because the belt is broad and long, giving it a large

gripping surface. For the same reason it will not sink into plowed

ground. Because of its flexible tread surface it will creep over rocks

and stumps, waddle down into a ditch and climb up the opposite bank. So

powerful is it that it will crash through underbrush with ease and even

small trees yield before it. It will run over soft mud, deep sand, and

even snow with equal facility. The tread belts on either side of the

tractor are separately driven and by making one belt run faster than

the other it is possible to steer the machine. In fact it can be made

to turn around in its own length by stopping the belt on one side and

driving the belt on the other.

Such a machine is ideal for plowing and other are hauled with ease over

the soft plowed ground. For ordinary farming purposes speed is not

essential, but the possibility of rapid travel with tread-belt traction

was demonstrated in the World War when small “tanks” were built which

could run at the rate of twelve miles per hour.

Mechanics: The Science of Machinery · 第 13 / 22 章