CHAPTER I.

Transcriber's note

Minor punctuation errors have been changed without notice. Printer

errors have been changed and are listed at the end.

THE

KAMA SUTRA

OF

VATSYAYANA.

TRANSLATED FROM THE SANSCRIT.

IN SEVEN PARTS,

WITH

PREFACE, INTRODUCTION,

AND

CONCLUDING REMARKS.

Reprint:

_Cosmopoli: MDCCCLXXXIII: for the Kama Shastra Society of

London and Benares, and for private circulation only._

DEDICATED

TO THAT SMALL PORTION OF THE BRITISH PUBLIC

WHICH TAKES ENLIGHTENED INTEREST IN

STUDYING THE MANNERS AND CUSTOMS

OF THE OLDEN EAST.

PREFACE.

In the literature of all countries there will be found a certain number

of works treating especially of love. Everywhere the subject is dealt

with differently, and from various points of view. In the present

publication it is proposed to give a complete translation of what is

considered the standard work on love in Sanscrit literature, and which

is called the 'Vatsyayana Kama Sutra,' or Aphorisms on Love, by

Vatsyayana.

While the introduction will bear with the evidence concerning the date

of the writing, and the commentaries written upon it, the chapters

following the introduction will give a translation of the work itself.

It is, however, advisable to furnish here a brief analysis of works of

the same nature, prepared by authors who lived and wrote years after

Vatsya had passed away, but who still considered him as a great

authority, and always quoted him as the chief guide to Hindoo erotic

literature.

Besides the treatise of Vatsyayana the following works on the same

subject are procurable in India:--

1. The Ratirahasya, or secrets of love.

2. The Panchasakya, or the five arrows.

3. The Smara Pradipa, or the light of love.

4. The Ratimanjari, or the garland of love.

5. The Rasmanjari, or the sprout of love.

6. The Anunga Runga, or the stage of love; also called

Kamaledhiplava, or a boat in the ocean of love.

The author of the 'Secrets of Love' (No. 1) was a poet named Kukkoka. He

composed his work to please one Venudutta, who was perhaps a king. When

writing his own name at the end of each chapter he calls himself "Siddha

patiya pandita," _i.e._, an ingenious man among learned men. The work

was translated into Hindi years ago, and in this the author's name was

written as Koka. And as the same name crept into all the translations

into other languages in India, the book became generally known, and the

subject was popularly called Koka Shastra, or doctrines of Koka, which

is identical with the Kama Shastra, or doctrines of love, and the words

Koka Shastra and Kama Shastra are used indiscriminately.

The work contains nearly eight hundred verses, and is divided into ten

chapters, which are called Pachivedas. Some of the things treated of in

this work are not to be found in the Vatsyayana, such as the four

classes of women, viz., the Padmini, Chitrini, Shankini and Hastini, as

also the enumeration of the days and hours on which the women of the

different classes become subject to love. The author adds that he wrote

these things from the opinions of Gonikaputra and Nandikeshwara, both of

whom are mentioned by Vatsyayana, but their works are not now extant. It

is difficult to give any approximate idea as to the year in which the

work was composed. It is only to be presumed that it was written after

that of Vatsyayana, and previous to the other works on this subject that

are still extant. Vatsyayana gives the names of ten authors on the

subject, all of whose works he had consulted, but none of which are

extant, and does not mention this one. This would tend to show that

Kukkoka wrote after Vatsya, otherwise Vatsya would assuredly have

mentioned him as an author in this branch of literature along with the

others.

The author of the 'Five Arrows' (No. 2 in the list) was one Jyotirisha.

He is called the chief ornament of poets, the treasure of the sixty-four

arts, and the best teacher of the rules of music. He says that he

composed the work after reflecting on the aphorisms of love as revealed

by the gods, and studying the opinions of Gonikaputra, Muladeva,

Babhravya, Ramtideva, Nundikeshwara and Kshemandra. It is impossible to

say whether he had perused all the works of these authors, or had only

heard about them; anyhow, none of them appear to be in existence now.

This work contains nearly six hundred verses, and is divided into five

chapters, called Sayakas or Arrows.

The author of the 'Light of Love' (No. 3) was the poet Gunakara, the son

of Vechapati. The work contains four hundred verses, and gives only a

short account of the doctrines of love, dealing more with other

matters.

'The Garland of Love' (No. 4) is the work of the famous poet Jayadeva,

who said about himself that he is a writer on all subjects. This

treatise is, however, very short, containing only one hundred and

twenty-five verses.

The author of the 'Sprout of Love' (No. 5) was a poet called Bhanudatta.

It appears from the last verse of the manuscript that he was a resident

of the province of Tirhoot, the son of a Brahman named Ganeshwar, who

was also a poet. The work, written in Sanscrit, gives the descriptions

of different classes of men and women, their classes being made out from

their age, description, conduct, etc. It contains three chapters, and

its date is not known, and cannot be ascertained.

'The Stage of Love' (No. 6) was composed by the poet Kullianmull, for

the amusement of Ladkhan, the son of Ahmed Lodi, the same Ladkhan being

in some places spoken of as Ladana Mull, and in others as Ladanaballa.

He is supposed to have been a relation or connection of the house of

Lodi, which reigned in Hindostan from A.D. 1450-1526. The work would,

therefore, have been written in the fifteenth or sixteenth century. It

contains ten chapters, and has been translated into English, but only

six copies were printed for private circulation. This is supposed to be

the latest of the Sanscrit works on the subject, and the ideas in it

were evidently taken from previous writings of the same nature.

The contents of these works are in themselves a literary curiosity.

There are to be found both in Sanscrit poetry and in the Sanscrit drama

a certain amount of poetical sentiment and romance, which have, in every

country and in every language, thrown an immortal halo round the

subject. But here it is treated in a plain, simple, matter of fact sort

of way. Men and women are divided into classes and divisions in the same

way that Buffon and other writers on natural history have classified and

divided the animal world. As Venus was represented by the Greeks to

stand forth as the type of the beauty of woman, so the Hindoos describe

the Padmini or Lotus woman as the type of most perfect feminine

excellence, as follows:

She in whom the following signs and symptoms appear is called a Padmini.

Her face is pleasing as the full moon; her body, well clothed with

flesh, is soft as the Shiras or mustard flower, her skin is fine,

tender and fair as the yellow lotus, never dark coloured. Her eyes are

bright and beautiful as the orbs of the fawn, well cut, and with reddish

corners. Her bosom is hard, full and high; she has a good neck; her nose

is straight and lovely, and three folds or wrinkles cross her

middle--about the umbilical region. Her yoni resembles the opening lotus

bud, and her love seed (Kama salila) is perfumed like the lily that has

newly burst. She walks with swan-like gait, and her voice is low and

musical as the note of the Kokila bird, she delights in white raiments,

in fine jewels, and in rich dresses. She eats little, sleeps lightly,

and being as respectful and religious as she is clever and courteous,

she is ever anxious to worship the gods, and to enjoy the conversation

of Brahmans. Such, then, is the Padmini or Lotus woman.

Detailed descriptions then follow of the Chitrini or Art woman; the

Shankhini or Conch woman, and the Hastini or Elephant woman, their days

of enjoyment, their various seats of passion, the manner in which they

should be manipulated and treated in sexual intercourse, along with the

characteristics of the men and women of the various countries in

Hindostan. The details are so numerous, and the subjects so seriously

dealt with, and at such length, that neither time nor space will permit

of their being given here.

One work in the English language is somewhat similar to these works of

the Hindoos. It is called 'Kalogynomia: or the Laws of Female Beauty,'

being the elementary principles of that science, by T. Bell, M.D., with

twenty-four plates, and printed in London in 1821. It treats of Beauty,

of Love, of Sexual Intercourse, of the Laws regulating that Intercourse,

of Monogamy and Polygamy, of Prostitution, of Infidelity, ending with a

_catalogue raisonnée_ of the defects of female beauty.

Other works in English also enter into great details of private and

domestic life. 'The Elements of Social Science, or Physical, Sexual and

Natural Religion,' by a Doctor of Medicine, London, 1880, and 'Every

Woman's Book,' by Dr. Waters, 1826. To persons interested in the above

subjects these works will be found to contain such details as have been

seldom before published, and which ought to be thoroughly understood by

all philanthropists and benefactors of society.

After a perusal of the Hindoo work, and of the English books above

mentioned, the reader will understand the subject, at all events from a

materialistic, realistic and practical point of view. If all science is

founded more or less on a stratum of facts, there can be no harm in

making known to mankind generally certain matters intimately connected

with their private, domestic, and social life.

Alas! complete ignorance of them has unfortunately wrecked many a man

and many a woman, while a little knowledge of a subject generally

ignored by the masses would have enabled numbers of people to have

understood many things which they believed to be quite incomprehensible,

or which were not thought worthy of their consideration.

INTRODUCTION.

It may be interesting to some persons to learn how it came about that

Vatsyayana was first brought to light and translated into the English

language. It happened thus. While translating with the pundits the

'Anunga runga, or the stage of love,' reference was frequently found to

be made to one Vatsya. The sage Vatsya was of this opinion, or of that

opinion. The sage Vatsya said this, and so on. Naturally questions were

asked who the sage was, and the pundits replied that Vatsya was the

author of the standard work on love in Sanscrit literature, that no

Sanscrit library was complete without his work, and that it was most

difficult now to obtain in its entire state. The copy of the manuscript

obtained in Bombay was defective, and so the pundits wrote to Benares,

Calcutta and Jeypoor for copies of the manuscript from Sanscrit

libraries in those places. Copies having been obtained, they were then

compared with each other, and with the aid of a Commentary called

'Jayamangla' a revised copy of the entire manuscript was prepared, and

from this copy the English translation was made. The following is the

certificate of the chief pundit:--

"The accompanying manuscript is corrected by me after comparing four

different copies of the work. I had the assistance of a Commentary

called 'Jayamangla' for correcting the portion in the first five parts,

but found great difficulty in correcting the remaining portion, because,

with the exception of one copy thereof which was tolerably correct, all

the other copies I had were far too incorrect. However, I took that

portion as correct in which the majority of the copies agreed with each

other."

The 'Aphorisms on Love,' by Vatsyayana, contains about one thousand two

hundred and fifty slokas or verses, and are divided into parts, parts

into chapters, and chapters into paragraphs. The whole consists of

seven parts, thirty-six chapters, and sixty-four paragraphs. Hardly

anything is known about the author. His real name is supposed to be

Mallinaga or Mrillana, Vatsyayana being his family name. At the close of

the work this is what he writes about himself:

"After reading and considering the works of Babhravya and other ancient

authors, and thinking over the meaning of the rules given by them, this

treatise was composed, according to the precepts of the Holy Writ, for

the benefit of the world, by Vatsyayana, while leading the life of a

religious student at Benares, and wholly engaged in the contemplation of

the Deity. This work is not to be used merely as an instrument for

satisfying our desires. A person acquainted with the true principles of

this science, who preserves his Dharma (virtue or religious merit), his

Artha (worldly wealth) and his Kama (pleasure or sensual gratification),

and who has regard to the customs of the people, is sure to obtain the

mastery over his senses. In short, an intelligent and knowing person,

attending to Dharma and Artha and also to Kama, without becoming the

slave of his passions, will obtain success in everything that he may

do."

It is impossible to fix the exact date either of the life of Vatsyayana

or of his work. It is supposed that he must have lived between the first

and the sixth centuries of the Christian era, on the following

grounds:--He mentions that Satkarni Srtvahan, a king of Kuntal, killed

Malayevati his wife with an instrument called kartari by striking her in

the passion of love, and Vatsya quotes this case to warn people of the

danger arising from some old customs of striking women when under the

influence of this passion. Now this king of Kuntal is believed to have

lived and reigned during the first century A.C., and consequently Vatsya

must have lived after him. On the other hand, Virahamihira, in the

eighteenth chapter of his 'Brihatsanhita,' treats of the science of

love, and appears to have borrowed largely from Vatsyayana on the

subject. Now Virahamihira is said to have lived during the sixth century

A.D., and as Vatsya must have written his works previously, therefore

not earlier than the first century, A.C., and not later than the sixth

century A.D., must be considered as the approximate date of his

existence.

On the text of the 'Aphorisms on Love,' by Vatsyayana, only two

commentaries have been found. One called 'Jayamangla' or 'Sutrabashya,'

and the other 'Sutra vritti.' The date of the 'Jayamangla' is fixed

between the tenth and thirteenth centuries A.D., because while treating

of the sixty-four arts an example is taken from the 'Kávyaprakásha,'

which was written about the tenth century A.D. Again, the copy of the

commentary procured was evidently a transcript of a manuscript which

once had a place in the library of a Chaulukyan king named Vishaladeva,

a fact elicited from the following sentence at the end of it:--

"Here ends the part relating to the art of love in the commentary on the

'Vatsyayana Kama Sutra,' a copy from the library of the king of kings,

Vishaladeva, who was a powerful hero, as it were a second Arjuna, and

head jewel of the Chaulukya family."

Now it is well known that this king ruled in Guzerat from 1244 to 1262

A.D., and founded a city called Visalnagur. The date, therefore, of the

commentary is taken to be not earlier than the tenth and not later than

the thirteenth century. The author of it is supposed to be one

Yashodhara, the name given him by his preceptor being Indrapada. He

seems to have written it during the time of affliction caused by his

separation from a clever and shrewd woman, at least that is what he

himself says at the end of each chapter. It is presumed that he called

his work after the name of his absent mistress, or the word may have

some connection with the meaning of her name.

This commentary was most useful in explaining the true meaning of

Vatsyayana, for the commentator appears to have had a considerable

knowledge of the times of the older author, and gives in some places

very minute information. This cannot be said of the other commentary,

called "Sutra vritti," which was written about A.D., by Narsing Shastri,

a pupil of a Sarveshwar Shastri; the latter was a descendant of Bhaskur,

and so also was our author, for at the conclusion of every part he calls

himself Bhaskur Narsing Shastra. He was induced to write the work by

order of the learned Raja Vrijalala, while he was residing in Benares,

but as to the merits of this commentary it does not deserve much

commendation. In many cases the writer does not appear to have

understood the meaning of the original author, and has changed the text

in many places to fit in with his own explanations.

A complete translation of the original work now follows. It has been

prepared in complete accordance with the text of the manuscript, and is

given, without further comments, as made from it.

PART I.

THE VATSYAYANA SUTRA.

INTRODUCTORY PREFACE.

SALUTATION TO DHARMA, ARTHA AND KAMA.

In the beginning, the Lord of Beings created men and women, and in the

form of commandments in one hundred thousand chapters laid down rules

for regulating their existence with regard to Dharma,[1] Artha,[2] and

Kama.[3] Some of these commandments, namely those which treated of

Dharma, were separately written by Swayambhu Manu; those that related to

Artha were compiled by Brihaspati; and those that referred to Kama were

expounded by Nandi, the follower of Mahadeva, in one thousand chapters.

Now these 'Kama Sutra' (Aphorisms on Love), written by Nandi in one

thousand chapters, were reproduced by Shvetaketu, the son of Uddvalaka,

in an abbreviated form in five hundred chapters, and this work was again

similarly reproduced in an abridged form, in one hundred and fifty

chapters, by Babhravya, an inhabitant of the Punchala (South of Delhi)

country. These one hundred and fifty chapters were then put together

under seven heads or parts named severally--

1st. Sadharana (general topics).

2nd. Samprayogika (embraces, etc.).

3rd. Kanya Samprayuktaka (union of males and females).

4th. Bharyadhikarika (on one's own wife).

5th. Paradika (on the wives of other people).

6th. Vaisika (on courtesans).

7th. Aupamishadika (on the arts of seduction, tonic medicines, etc.).

The sixth part of this last work was separately expounded by Dattaka at

the request of the public women of Pataliputra (Patna), and in the same

way Charayana explained the first part of it. The remaining parts, viz.,

the second, third, fourth, fifth, and seventh were each separately

expounded by--

Suvarnanabha (second part).

Ghotakamukha (third part).

Gonardiya (fourth part).

Gonikaputra (fifth part).

Kuchumara (seventh part), respectively.

Thus the work being written in parts by different authors was almost

unobtainable, and as the parts which were expounded by Dattaka and the

others treated only of the particular branches of the subject to which

each part related, and moreover as the original work of Babhravya was

difficult to be mastered on account of its length, Vatsyayana,

therefore, composed his work in a small volume as an abstract of the

whole of the works of the above-named authors.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 1: Dharma is acquisition of religious merit, and is fully

described in Chapter 5, Volume III., of Talboys Wheeler's 'History of

India,' and in the edicts of Asoka.]

[Footnote 2: Artha is acquisition of wealth and property, etc.]

[Footnote 3: Kama is love, pleasure and sensual gratification.

These three words are retained throughout in their original, as

technical terms. They may also be defined as virtue, wealth and

pleasure, the three things repeatedly spoken of in the Laws of Manu.]

PART I.

CHAPTER I.

BEING THE INDEX TO OR CONTENTS OF THE WORK.

Chapter II. Observations on the three worldly attainments of

Virtue, Wealth and Love.

" III. On the study of the Sixty-four Arts.

" IV. On the Arrangements of a House, and Household Furniture;

and about the Daily Life of a Citizen, his

Companions, Amusements, &c.

" V. About classes of Women fit and unfit for Congress with

the Citizen, and of Friends, and Messengers.

PART II.

ON SEXUAL UNION.

Chapter I. Kinds of Union according to Dimensions, Force of Desire,

and Time; and on the different kinds of Love.

" II. Of the Embrace.

" III. On Kissing.

" IV. On Pressing or Marking with the Nails.

" V. On Biting, and the ways of Love to be employed with

regard to Women of different countries.

" VI. On the various ways of Lying Down, and the different

kinds of Congress.

" VII. On the various ways of Striking, and of the Sounds

appropriate to them.

" VIII. About females acting the part of Males.

" IX. On holding the Lingam in the Mouth.

" X. How to begin and how to end the Congress. Different

kinds of Congress, and Love Quarrels.

PART III.

ABOUT THE ACQUISITION OF A WIFE.

Chapter I. Observations on Betrothal and Marriage.

" II. About creating Confidence in the Girl.

" III. Courtship, and the manifestations of the feelings by

outward signs and deeds.

" IV. On things to be done only by the Man, and the

acquisition of the Girl thereby. Also what to be done

by a Girl to gain over a Man and subject him to her.

" V. On the different Forms of Marriage.

PART IV.

ABOUT A WIFE.

Chapter I. On the manner of living of a virtuous Woman, and of her

behaviour during the absence of her Husband.

" II. On the conduct of the eldest Wife towards the other

Wives of her husband, and of the younger Wife towards

the elder ones. Also on the conduct of a Virgin Widow

re-married; of a Wife disliked by her Husband; of the

Women in the King's Harem; and of a Husband who has

more than one Wife.

PART V.

ABOUT THE WIVES OF OTHER PEOPLE.

Chapter I. On the Characteristics of Men and Women, and the reason

why Women reject the Addresses of Men. About Men who

have Success with Women, and about Women who are

easily gained over.

" II. About making Acquaintance with the Woman, and of the

efforts to gain her over.

" III. Examination of the State of a Woman's mind.

" IV. The business of a Go-between.

" V. On the Love of Persons in authority with the Wives of

other People.

" VI. About the Women of the Royal Harem, and of the keeping

of one's own Wife.

PART VI.

ABOUT COURTESANS.

Chapter I. Of the Causes of a Courtesan resorting to Men; of the

means of Attaching to herself the Man desired, and

the kind of Man that it is desirable to be acquainted

with.

" II. Of a Courtesan living with a Man as his Wife.

" III. Of the means of getting Money; of the Signs of a Lover

who is beginning to be weary, and of the way to get

rid of him.

" IV. About a Re-union with a former Lover.

" V. Of different kinds of Gain.

" VI. Of Gains and Losses, attendant Gains and Losses, and

Doubts; and lastly, the different kinds of

Courtesans.

PART VII.

ON THE MEANS OF ATTRACTING OTHERS TO ONE'S SELF.

Chapter I. On Personal Adornment, subjugating the hearts of others,

and of tonic medicines.

" II. Of the Means of exciting Desire, and of the ways of

enlarging the Lingam. Miscellaneous Experiments and

Receipts.

PART I.

CHAPTER II.

ON THE ACQUISITION OF DHARMA, ARTHA AND KAMA.

Man, the period of whose life is one hundred years, should practise

Dharma, Artha, and Kama at different times and in such a manner that

they may harmonize together and not clash in any way. He should acquire

learning in his childhood, in his youth and middle age he should attend

to Artha and Kama, and in his old age he should perform Dharma, and thus

seek to gain Moksha, _i.e._, release from further transmigration. Or, on

account of the uncertainty of life, he may practise them at times when

they are enjoined to be practised. But one thing is to be noted, he

should lead the life of a religious student until he finishes his

education.

_Dharma_ is obedience to the command of the Shastra or Holy Writ of the

Hindoos to do certain things, such as the performance of sacrifices,

which are not generally done because they do not belong to this world,

and produce no visible effect; and not to do other things, such as

eating meat, which is often done because it belongs to this world, and

has visible effects.

Dharma should be learnt from the Shruti (Holy Writ), and from those

conversant with it.

_Artha_ is the acquisition of arts, land, gold, cattle, wealth,

equipages and friends. It is, further, the protection of what is

acquired, and the increase of what is protected.

Artha should be learnt from the king's officers, and from merchants who

may be versed in the ways of commerce.

_Kama_ is the enjoyment of appropriate objects by the five senses of

hearing, feeling, seeing, tasting, and smelling, assisted by the mind

together with the soul. The ingredient in this is a peculiar contact

between the organ of sense and its object, and the consciousness of

pleasure which arises from that contact is called Kama.

Kama is to be learnt from the Kama Sutra (aphorisms on love) and from

the practice of citizens.

When all the three, viz., Dharma, Artha, and Kama come together, the

former is better than the one which follows it, _i.e._, Dharma is better

than Artha, and Artha is better than Kama. But Artha should be always

first practised by the king, for the livelihood of men is to be obtained

from it only. Again, Kama being the occupation of public women, they

should prefer it to the other two, and these are exceptions to the

general rule.

_Objection 1._

Some learned men say that as Dharma is connected with things not

belonging to this world, it is appropriately treated of in a book; and

so also is Artha, because it is practised only by the application of

proper means, and a knowledge of those means can only be obtained by

study and from books. But Kama being a thing which is practised even by

the brute creation, and which is to be found everywhere, does not want

any work on the subject.

_Answer._

This is not so. Sexual intercourse being a thing dependent on man and

woman requires the application of proper means by them, and those means

are to be learnt from the Kama Shastra. The non-application of proper

means, which we see in the brute creation, is caused by their being

unrestrained, and by the females among them only being fit for sexual

intercourse at certain seasons and no more, and by their intercourse not

being preceded by thought of any kind.

_Objection 2._

The Lokayatikas[4] say:--Religious ordinances should not be observed,

for they bear a future fruit, and at the same time it is also doubtful

whether they will bear any fruit at all. What foolish person will give

away that which is in his own hands into the hands of another?

Moreover, it is better to have a pigeon to-day than a peacock to-morrow;

and a copper coin which we have the certainty of obtaining, is better

than a gold coin, the possession of which is doubtful.

_Answer._

It is not so. 1st. Holy Writ, which ordains the practice of Dharma, does

not admit of a doubt.

2nd. Sacrifices such as those made for the destruction of enemies, or

for the fall of rain, are seen to bear fruit.

3rd. The sun, moon, stars, planets and other heavenly bodies appear to

work intentionally for the good of the world.

4th. The existence of this world is effected by the observance of the

rules respecting the four classes[5] of men and their four stages of

life.

5th. We see that seed is thrown into the ground with the hope of future

crops.

Vatsyayana is therefore of opinion that the ordinances of religion must

be obeyed.

_Objection 3._

Those who believe that destiny is the prime mover of all things say:--We

should not exert ourselves to acquire wealth, for sometimes it is not

acquired although we strive to get it, while at other times it comes to

us of itself without any exertion on our part. Everything is therefore

in the power of destiny, who is the lord of gain and loss, of success

and defeat, of pleasure and pain. Thus we see the Bali[6] was raised to

the throne of Indra by destiny, and was also put down by the same power,

and it is destiny only that can re-instate him.

_Answer._

It is not right to say so. As the acquisition of every object

pre-supposes at all events some exertion on the part of man, the

application of proper means may be said to be the cause of gaining all

our ends, and this application of proper means being thus necessary

(even where a thing is destined to happen), it follows that a person who

does nothing will enjoy no happiness.

_Objection 4._

Those who are inclined to think that Artha is the chief object to be

obtained argue thus. Pleasures should not be sought for, because they

are obstacles to the practice of Dharma and Artha, which are both

superior to them, and are also disliked by meritorious persons.

Pleasures also bring a man into distress, and into contact with low

persons; they cause him to commit unrighteous deeds, and produce

impurity in him; they make him regardless of the future, and encourage

carelessness and levity. And lastly, they cause him to be disbelieved by

all, received by none, and despised by everybody, including himself. It

is notorious, moreover, that many men who have given themselves up to

pleasure alone, have been ruined along with their families and

relations. Thus, King Dandakya,[7] of the Bhoja dynasty, carried off a

Brahman's daughter with evil intent, and was eventually ruined and lost

his kingdom. Indra, too, having violated the chastity of Ahalya,[8] was

made to suffer for it. In a like manner the mighty Kichaka,[9] who tried

to seduce Draupadi, and Ravana,[10] who attempted to gain over Sita, were

punished for their crimes. These and many others fell by reason of their

pleasures.

_Answer._

This objection cannot be sustained, for pleasures, being as necessary

for the existence and well being of the body as food, are consequently

equally required. They are, moreover, the results of Dharma and Artha.

Pleasures are, therefore, to be followed with moderation and caution. No

one refrains from cooking food because there are beggars to ask for it,

or from sowing seed because there are deer to destroy the corn when it

is grown up.

Thus a man practising Dharma, Artha and Kama enjoys happiness both in

this world and in the world to come. The good perform those actions in

which there is no fear as to what is to result from them in the next

world, and in which there is no danger to their welfare. Any action

which conduces to the practice of Dharma, Artha and Kama together, or of

any two, or even one of them, should be performed, but an action which

conduces to the practice of one of them at the expense of the remaining

two should not be performed.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 4: These were certainly materialists who seemed to think that

a bird in the hand was worth two in the bush.]

[Footnote 5: Among the Hindoos the four classes of men are the Brahmans

or priestly class, the Kshutrya or warlike class, the Vaishya or

agricultural and mercantile class, and the Shoodra or menial class. The

four stages of life are, the life of a religious student, the life of a

householder, the life of a hermit, and the life of a Sunyasi or

devotee.]

[Footnote 6: Bali was a demon who had conquered Indra and gained his

throne, but was afterwards overcome by Vishnu at the time of his fifth

incarnation.]

[Footnote 7: Dandakya is said to have abducted from the forest the

daughter of a Brahman, named Bhargava, and being cursed by the Brahman,

was buried with his kingdom under a shower of dust. The place was called

after his name the Dandaka forest, celebrated in the Ramayana, but now

unknown.]

[Footnote 8: Ahalya was the wife of the sage Gautama. Indra caused her

to believe that he was Gautama, and thus enjoyed her. He was cursed by

Gautama and subsequently afflicted with a thousand ulcers on his body.]

[Footnote 9: Kichaka was the brother-in-law of King Virata, with whom

the Pandavas had taken refuge for one year. Kichaka was killed by Bhima,

who assumed the disguise of Draupadi. For this story the Mahabarata

should be referred to.]

[Footnote 10: The story of Ravana is told in the Ramayana, which with the

Mahabarata form the two great epic poems of the Hindoos; the latter was

written by Vyasa, and the former by Valmiki.]

CHAPTER III.

ON THE ARTS AND SCIENCES TO BE STUDIED.

Man should study the Kama Sutra and the arts and sciences subordinate

thereto, in addition to the study of the arts and sciences contained in

Dharma and Artha. Even young maids should study this Kama Sutra along

with its arts and sciences before marriage, and after it they should

continue to do so with the consent of their husbands.

Here some learned men object, and say that females, not being allowed to

study any science, should not study the Kama Sutra.

But Vatsyayana is of opinion that this objection does not hold good, for

women already know the practice of Kama Sutra, and that practice is

derived from the Kama Shastra, or the science of Kama itself. Moreover,

it is not only in this but in many other cases that though the practice

of a science is known to all, only a few persons are acquainted with the

rules and laws on which the science is based. Thus the Yadnikas or

sacrificers, though ignorant of grammar, make use of appropriate words

when addressing the different Deities, and do not know how these words

are framed. Again, persons do the duties required of them on auspicious

days, which are fixed by astrology, though they are not acquainted with

the science of astrology. In a like manner riders of horses and

elephants train these animals without knowing the science of training

animals, but from practice only. And similarly the people of the most

distant provinces obey the laws of the kingdom from practice, and

because there is a king over them, and without further reason.[11] And

from experience we find that some women, such as daughters of princes

and their ministers, and public women, are actually versed in the Kama

Shastra.

A female, therefore, should learn the Kama Shastra, or at least a part

of it, by studying its practice from some confidential friend. She

should study alone in private the sixty-four practices that form a part

of the Kama Shastra. Her teacher should be one of the following persons,

viz., the daughter of a nurse brought up with her and already

married,[12] or a female friend who can be trusted in everything, or the

sister of her mother (_i.e._, her aunt), or an old female servant, or a

female beggar who may have formerly lived in the family, or her own

sister, who can always be trusted.

The following are the arts to be studied, together with the Kama

Sutra:--

1. Singing.

2. Playing on musical instruments.

3. Dancing.

4. Union of dancing, singing, and playing instrumental music.

5. Writing and drawing.

6. Tattooing.

7. Arraying and adorning an idol with rice and flowers.

8. Spreading and arraying beds or couches of flowers, or flowers upon

the ground.

9. Colouring the teeth, garments, hair, nails, and bodies, _i.e._,

staining, dyeing, colouring and painting the same.

10. Fixing stained glass into a floor.

11. The art of making beds, and spreading out carpets and cushions for

reclining.

12. Playing on musical glasses filled with water.

13. Storing and accumulating water in aqueducts, cisterns and

reservoirs.

14. Picture making, trimming and decorating.

15. Stringing of rosaries, necklaces, garlands and wreaths.

16. Binding of turbans and chaplets, and making crests and top-knots of

flowers.

17. Scenic representations. Stage playing.

18. Art of making ear ornaments.

19. Art of preparing perfumes and odours.

20. Proper disposition of jewels and decorations, and adornment in

dress.

21. Magic or sorcery.

22. Quickness of hand or manual skill.

23. Culinary art, _i.e._, cooking and cookery.

24. Making lemonades, sherbets, acidulated drinks, and spirituous

extracts with proper flavour and colour.

25. Tailor's work and sewing.

26. Making parrots, flowers, tufts, tassels, bunches, bosses, knobs,

&c., out of yarn or thread.

27. Solution of riddles, enigmas, covert speeches, verbal puzzles and

enigmatical questions.

28. A game, which consisted in repeating verses, and as one person

finished, another person had to commence at once, repeating another

verse, beginning with the same letter with which the last speaker's

verse ended, whoever failed to repeat was considered to have lost, and

to be subject to pay a forfeit or stake of some kind.

29. The art of mimicry or imitation.

30. Reading, including chanting and intoning.

31. Study of sentences difficult to pronounce. It is played as a game

chiefly by women and children, and consists of a difficult sentence

being given, and when repeated quickly, the words are often transposed

or badly pronounced.

32. Practice with sword, single stick, quarter staff, and bow and arrow.

33. Drawing inferences, reasoning or inferring.

34. Carpentry, or the work of a carpenter.

35. Architecture, or the art of building.

36. Knowledge about gold and silver coins, and jewels and gems.

37. Chemistry and mineralogy.

38. Colouring jewels, gems and beads.

39. Knowledge of mines and quarries.

40. Gardening; knowledge of treating the diseases of trees and plants,

of nourishing them, and determining their ages.

41. Art of cock fighting, quail fighting and ram fighting.

42. Art of teaching parrots and starlings to speak.

43. Art of applying perfumed ointments to the body, and of dressing the

hair with unguents and perfumes and braiding it.

44. The art of understanding writing in cypher, and the writing of words

in a peculiar way.

45. The art of speaking by changing the forms of words. It is of various

kinds. Some speak by changing the beginning and end of words, others by

adding unnecessary letters between every syllable of a word, and so on.

46. Knowledge of language and of the vernacular dialects.

47. Art of making flower carriages.

48. Art of framing mystical diagrams, of addressing spells and charms,

and binding armlets.

49. Mental exercises, such as completing stanzas or verses on receiving

a part of them; or supplying one, two or three lines when the remaining

lines are given indiscriminately from different verses, so as to make

the whole an entire verse with regard to its meaning; or arranging the

words of a verse written irregularly by separating the vowels from the

consonants, or leaving them out altogether; or putting into verse or

prose sentences represented by signs or symbols. There are many other

such exercises.

50. Composing poems.

51. Knowledge of dictionaries and vocabularies.

52. Knowledge of ways of changing and disguising the appearance of

persons.

53. Knowledge of the art of changing the appearance of things, such as

making cotton to appear as silk, coarse and common things to appear as

fine and good.

54. Various ways of gambling.

55. Art of obtaining possession of the property of others by means of

muntras or incantations.

56. Skill in youthful sports.

57. Knowledge of the rules of society, and of how to pay respects and

compliments to others.

58. Knowledge of the art of war, of arms, of armies, &c.

59. Knowledge of gymnastics.

60. Art of knowing the character of a man from his features.

61. Knowledge of scanning or constructing verses.

62. Arithmetical recreations.

63. Making artificial flowers.

64. Making figures and images in clay.

A public woman, endowed with a good disposition, beauty and other

winning qualities, and also versed in the above arts, obtains the name

of a Ganika, or public woman of high quality, and receives a seat of

honour in an assemblage of men. She is, moreover, always respected by

the king, and praised by learned men, and her favour being sought for by

all, she becomes an object of universal regard. The daughter of a king

too, as well as the daughter of a minister, being learned in the above

arts, can make their husbands favourable to them, even though these may

have thousands of other wives besides themselves. And in the same

manner, if a wife becomes separated from her husband, and falls into

distress, she can support herself easily, even in a foreign country, by

means of her knowledge of these arts. Even the bare knowledge of them

gives attractiveness to a woman, though the practice of them may be only

possible or otherwise according to the circumstances of each case. A man

who is versed in these arts, who is loquacious and acquainted with the

arts of gallantry, gains very soon the hearts of women, even though he

is only acquainted with them for a short time.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 11: The author wishes to prove that a great many things are

done by people from practice and custom, without their being acquainted

with the reason of things, or the laws on which they are based, and this

is perfectly true.]

[Footnote 12: The proviso of being married applies to all the teachers.]

CHAPTER IV.

THE LIFE OF A CITIZEN.[13]

Having thus acquired learning, a man, with the wealth that he may have

gained by gift, conquest, purchase, deposit,[14] or inheritance from his

ancestors, should become a householder, and pass the life of a citizen.

He should take a house in a city, or large village, or in the vicinity

of good men, or in a place which is the resort of many persons. This

abode should be situated near some water, and divided into different

compartments for different purposes. It should be surrounded by a

garden, and also contain two rooms, an outer and an inner one. The inner

room should be occupied by the females, while the outer room, balmy with

rich perfumes, should contain a bed, soft, agreeable to the sight

covered with a clean white cloth, low in the middle part, having

garlands and bunches of flowers[15] upon it, and a canopy above it, and

two pillows, one at the top, another at the bottom. There should be also

a sort of couch besides, and at the head of this a sort of stool, on

which should be placed the fragrant ointments for the night, as well as

flowers, pots containing collyrium and other fragrant substances, things

used for perfuming the mouth, and the bark of the common citron tree.

Near the couch, on the ground, there should be a pot for spitting, a box

containing ornaments, and also a lute hanging from a peg made of the

tooth of an elephant, a board for drawing, a pot containing perfume,

some books, and some garlands of the yellow amaranth flowers. Not far

from the couch, and on the ground, there should be a round seat, a toy

cart, and a board for playing with dice; outside the outer room

there should be cages of birds,[16] and a separate place for spinning,

carving, and such like diversions. In the garden there should be a

whirling swing and a common swing, as also a bower of creepers covered

with flowers, in which a raised parterre should be made for sitting.

Now the householder having got up in the morning and performed his

necessary duties,[17] should wash his teeth, apply a limited quantity of

ointments and perfumes to his body, put some ornaments on his person and

collyrium on his eyelids and below his eyes, colour his lips with

alacktaka,[18] and look at himself in the glass. Having then eaten betel

leaves, with other things that give fragrance to the mouth, he should

perform his usual business. He should bathe daily, anoint his body with

oil every other day, apply a lathering[19] substance to his body every

three days, get his head (including face) shaved every four days, and

the other parts of his body every five or ten days.[20] All these things

should be done without fail, and the sweat of the armpits should also be

removed. Meals should be taken in the forenoon, in the afternoon, and

again at night, according to Charayana. After breakfast, parrots and

other birds should be taught to speak, and the fighting of cocks,

quails, and rams should follow. A limited time should be devoted to

diversions with Pithamardas, Vitas, and Vidushakas,[21] and then should

be taken the midday sleep.[22] After this the householder, having put on

his clothes and ornaments, should, during the afternoon, converse with

his friends. In the evening there should be singing, and after that the

householder, along with his friend, should await in his room, previously

decorated and perfumed, the arrival of the woman that may be attached to

him, or he may send a female messenger for her, or go for her himself.

After her arrival at his house, he and his friend should welcome her,

and entertain her with a loving and agreeable conversation. Thus end the

duties of the day.

The following are the things to be done occasionally as diversions or

amusements.

1. Holding festivals[23] in honour of different Deities.

2. Social gatherings of both sexes.

3. Drinking parties.

4. Picnics.

5. Other social diversions.

_Festivals._

On some particular auspicious day, an assembly of citizens should be

convened in the temple of Saraswati.[24] There the skill of singers, and

of others who may have come recently to the town, should be tested, and

on the following day they should always be given some rewards. After

that they may either be retained or dismissed, according as their

performances are liked or not by the assembly. The members of the

assembly should act in concert, both in times of distress as well as in

times of prosperity, and it is also the duty of these citizens to show

hospitality to strangers who may have come to the assembly. What is said

above should be understood to apply to all the other festivals which may

be held in honour of the different Deities, according to the present

rules.

_Social Gatherings._

When men of the same age, disposition and talents, fond of the same

diversions and with the same degree of education, sit together in

company with public women,[25] or in an assembly of citizens, or at the

abode of one among themselves, and engage in agreeable discourse with

each other, such is called a sitting in company or a social gathering.

The subjects of discourse are to be the completion of verses half

composed by others, and the testing the knowledge of one another in the

various arts. The women who may be the most beautiful, who may like the

same things that the men like, and who may have power to attract the

minds of others, are here done homage to.

_Drinking Parties._

Men and women should drink in one another's houses. And here the men

should cause the public women to drink, and should then drink

themselves, liquors such as the Madhu, Aireya, Sara, and Asawa, which

are of bitter and sour taste; also drinks concocted from the barks of

various trees, wild fruits and leaves.

_Going to Gardens or Picnics._

In the forenoon, men, having dressed themselves should go to gardens on

horseback, accompanied by public women and followed by servants. And

having done there all the duties of the day, and passed the time in

various agreeable diversions, such as the fighting of quails, cocks and

rams, and other spectacles, they should return home in the afternoon in

the same manner, bringing with them bunches of flowers, &c.

The same also applies to bathing in summer in water from which wicked or

dangerous animals have previously been taken out, and which has been

built in on all sides.

_Other Social Diversions._

Spending nights playing with dice. Going out on moonlight nights.

Keeping the festive day in honour of spring. Plucking the sprouts and

fruits of the mangoe trees. Eating the fibres of lotuses. Eating the

tender ears of corn. Picnicing in the forests when the trees get their

new foliage. The Udakakashvedika or sporting in the water. Decorating

each other with the flowers of some trees. Pelting each other with the

flowers of the Kadamba tree, and many other sports which may either be

known to the whole country, or may be peculiar to particular parts of

it. These and similar other amusements should always be carried on by

citizens.

The above amusements should be followed by a person who diverts himself

alone in company with a courtesan, as well as by a courtesan who can do

the same in company with her maid servants or with citizens.

A Pithamarda[26] is a man without wealth, alone in the world, whose only

property consists of his Mallika,[27] some lathering, substance and a

red cloth, who comes from a good country, and who is skilled in all the

arts; and by teaching these arts is received in the company of citizens,

and in the abode of public women.

A Vita[28] is a man who has enjoyed the pleasures of fortune, who is a

compatriot of the citizens with whom he associates, who is possessed of

the qualities of a householder, who has his wife with him, and who is

honoured in the assembly of citizens, and in the abodes of public women,

and lives on their means and on them.

A Vidushaka[29] (also called a Vaihasaka, _i.e._, one who provokes

laughter) is a person only acquainted with some of the arts who is a

jester, and who is trusted by all.

These persons are employed in matters of quarrels and reconciliations

between citizens and public women.

This remark applies also to female beggars, to women with their heads

shaved, to adulterous women, and to old public women skilled in all the

various arts.

Thus a citizen living in his town or village, respected by all, should

call on the persons of his own caste who may be worth knowing. He should

converse in company and gratify his friends by his society, and obliging

others by his assistance in various matters, he should cause them to

assist one another in the same way.

There are some verses on this subject as follows:--

A citizen discoursing, not entirely in the Sanscrit language,[30] nor

wholly in the dialects of the country, on various topics in society,

obtains great respect. The wise should not resort to a society disliked

by the public, governed by no rules, and intent on the destruction of

others. But a learned man living in a society which acts according to

the wishes of the people, and which has pleasure for its only object is

highly respected in this world.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 13: This term would appear to apply generally to an inhabitant

of Hindoostan. It is not meant only for a dweller in a city, like the

Latin Urbanus as opposed to Rusticus.]

[Footnote 14: Gift is peculiar to a Brahman, conquest to a Kshatrya,

while purchase, deposit, and other means of acquiring wealth belongs to

the Vaishya.]

[Footnote 15: Natural garden flowers.]

[Footnote 16: Such as quails, partridges, parrots, starlings, &c.]

[Footnote 17: The calls of nature always performed by the Hindoos the

first thing in the morning.]

[Footnote 18: A colour made from lac.]

[Footnote 19: This would act instead of soap, which was not introduced

until the rule of the Mahomedans.]

[Footnote 20: Ten days are allowed when the hair is taken out with a pair

of pincers.]

[Footnote 21: These are characters generally introduced in the Hindoo

drama; their characteristics will be explained further on.]

[Footnote 22: Noonday sleep is only allowed in summer, when the nights

are short.]

[Footnote 23: These are very common in all parts of India.]

[Footnote 24: In the 'Asiatic Miscellany,' and in Sir W. Jones's works,

will be found a spirited hymn addressed to this goddess, who is adored

as the patroness of the fine arts, especially of music and rhetoric, as

the inventress of the Sanscrit language, &c., &c. She is the goddess of

harmony, eloquence, and language, and is somewhat analogous to Minerva.

For further information about her, see Edward Moor's 'Hindoo Pantheon.']

[Footnote 25: The public women, or courtesans (Vesya), of the early

Hindoos have often been compared with the Hetera of the Greeks. The

subject is dealt with at some length in H. H. Wilson's 'Select Specimens

of the Theatre of the Hindoos,' in two volumes, Trubner & Co., 1871. It

may be fairly considered that the courtesan was one of the elements, and

an important element too, of early Hindoo society, and that her

education and intellect were both superior to that of the women of the

household. Wilson says, "By the Vesya or courtesan, however, we are not

to understand a female who has disregarded the obligation of law or the

precepts of virtue, but a character reared by a state of manners

unfriendly to the admission of wedded females into society, and opening

it only at the expense of reputation to women who were trained for

association with men by personal and mental acquirements to which the

matron was a stranger."]

[Footnote 26: According to this description a Pithamarda would be a sort

of professor of all the arts, and as such received as the friend and

confidant of the citizens.]

[Footnote 27: A seat in the form of the letter T.]

[Footnote 28: The Vita is supposed to represent somewhat the character

of the Parasite of the Greek comedy. It is possible that he was retained

about the person of the wealthy and dissipated as a kind of private

instructor, as well as an entertaining companion.]

[Footnote 29: Vidushaka is evidently the buffoon and jester. Wilson says

of him that he is the humble companion, not the servant, of a prince or

man of rank, and it is a curious peculiarity that he is always a

Brahman. He bears more affinity to Sancho Panza, perhaps, than any other

character in western fiction, imitating him in his combination of

shrewdness and simplicity, his fondness of good living and his love of

ease. In the dramas of intrigue he exhibits some of the talents of

Mercury, but with less activity and ingenuity, and occasionally suffers

by his interference. According to the technical definition of his

attributes he is to excite mirth by being ridiculous in person, age, and

attire.]

[Footnote 30: This means, it is presumed, that the citizen should be

acquainted with several languages. The middle part of this paragraph

might apply to the Nihilists and Fenians of the day, or to secret

societies. It was perhaps a reference to the Thugs.]

CHAPTER V.

ABOUT THE KINDS OF WOMEN RESORTED TO BY THE CITIZENS, AND OF FRIENDS AND

MESSENGERS.

When Kama is practised by men of the four castes according to the rules

of the Holy Writ (_i.e._, by lawful marriage) with virgins of their own

caste, it then becomes a means of acquiring lawful progeny and good

fame, and it is not also opposed to the customs of the world. On the

contrary the practice of Kama with women of the higher castes, and with

those previously enjoyed by others, even though they be of the same

caste, is prohibited. But the practice of Kama with women of the lower

castes, with women excommunicated from their own caste, with public

women, and with women twice married,[31] is neither enjoined nor

prohibited. The object of practising Kama with such women is pleasure

only.

Nayikas,[32] therefore, are of three kinds, viz., maids, women twice

married, and public women. Gonikaputra has expressed an opinion that

there is a fourth kind of Nayika, viz., a woman who is resorted to on

some special occasion even though she be previously married to another.

These special occasions are when a man thinks thus:--

(_a_). This woman is self-willed, and has been previously enjoyed

by many others besides myself. I may, therefore, safely

resort to her as to a public woman though she belongs to a

higher caste than mine, and in so doing I shall not be

violating the ordinances of

Dharma.

Or thus:--

(_b_). This is a twice-married woman and has been enjoyed by others

before me, there is, therefore, no objection to my

resorting to her.

Or thus:--

(_c_). This woman has gained the heart of her great and powerful

husband, and exercises a mastery over him, who is a friend

of my enemy; if, therefore, she becomes united with me,

she will cause her husband to abandon my enemy.

Or thus:--

(_d_). This woman will turn the mind of her husband, who is very

powerful, in my favour, he being at present disaffected

towards me, and intent on doing me some harm.

Or thus:--

(_e_). By making this woman my friend I shall gain the object of

some friend of mine, or shall be able to effect the ruin

of some enemy, or shall accomplish some other difficult

purpose.

Or thus:--

(_f_). By being united with this woman, I shall kill her husband,

and so obtain his vast riches which I covet.

Or thus:--

(_g_). The union of this woman with me is not attended with any

danger, and will bring me wealth, of which, on account of

my poverty and inability to support myself, I am very much

in need. I shall, therefore, obtain her vast riches in

this way without any difficulty.

Or thus:--

(_h_). This woman loves me ardently, and knows all my weak points,

if therefore, I am unwilling to be united with her, she

will make my faults public, and thus tarnish my character

and reputation. Or she will bring some gross accusation

against me, of which it may be hard to clear myself, and I

shall be ruined. Or perhaps she will detach from me her

husband, who is powerful, and yet under her control, and

will unite him to my enemy, or will herself join the latter.

Or thus:--

(_i_). The husband of this woman has violated the chastity of my

wives, I shall therefore return that injury by seducing

his wives.

Or thus:--

(_j_). By the help of this woman I shall kill an enemy of the king,

who has taken shelter with her, and whom I am ordered by

the king to destroy.

Or thus:

(_k_). The woman whom I love is under the control of this woman. I

shall, through the influence of the latter, be able to get

at the former.

Or thus:--

(_l_). This woman will bring to me a maid, who possesses wealth and

beauty, but who is hard to get at, and under the control

of another.

Or, lastly, thus:--

(_m_). My enemy is a friend of this woman's husband, I shall

therefore cause her to join him, and will thus create an

enmity between her husband and him.

For these and similar other reasons the wives of other men may be

resorted to, but it must be distinctly understood that is only allowed

for special reasons, and not for mere carnal desire.

Charayana thinks that under these circumstances there is also a fifth

kind of Nayika, viz., a woman who is kept by a minister, and who repairs

to him occasionally; or a widow who accomplishes the purpose of a man

with the person to whom she resorts.

Suvarnanabha adds that a woman who passes the life of an ascetic and in

the condition of a widow may be considered as a sixth kind of Nayika.

Ghotakamukha says that the daughter of a public woman, and a female

servant, who are still virgins, form a seventh kind of Nayika.

Gonardiya puts forth his doctrine that any woman born of good family,

after she has come of age, is an eighth kind of Nayika.

But these four latter kinds of Nayikas do not differ much from the first

four kinds of them, as there is no separate object in resorting to

them. Therefore Vatsyayana is of opinion that there are only four kinds

of Nayikas, _i.e._, the maid, the twice married woman, the public woman,

and the woman resorted to for a special purpose.

The following women are not to be enjoyed:--

A leper.

A lunatic.

A woman turned out of caste.

A woman who reveals secrets.

A woman who publicly expresses desire for sexual intercourse.

A woman who is extremely white.

A woman who is extremely black.

A bad-smelling woman.

A woman who is a near relation.

A woman who is a female friend.

A woman who leads the life of an ascetic.

And, lastly, the wife of a relation, of a friend, of a learned Brahman,

and of the king.

The followers of Babhravya say that any woman who has been enjoyed by

five men is a fit and proper person to be enjoyed. But Gonikaputra is of

opinion that even when this is the case, the wives of a relation, of a

learned Brahman and of a king should be excepted.

The following are the kind of friends:--

One who has played with you in the dust, _i.e._, in childhood.

One who is bound by an obligation.

One who is of the same disposition and fond of the same things.

One who is a fellow student.

One who is acquainted with your secrets and faults, and whose faults and

secrets are also known to you.

One who is a child of your nurse.

One who is brought up with you.

One who is an hereditary friend.

These friends should possess the following qualities:--

They should tell the truth.

They should not be changed by time.

They should be favourable to your designs.

They should be firm.

They should be free from covetousness.

They should not be capable of being gained over by others.

They should not reveal your secrets.

Charayana says that citizens form friendship with washermen, barbers,

cowherds, florists, druggists, betel-leaf sellers, tavern keepers,

beggars, Pithamardas, Vitas and Vidushekas, as also with the wives of

all these people.

A messenger should possess the following qualities:--

Skilfulness.

Boldness.

Knowledge of the intention of men by their outward signs.

Absence of confusion, _i.e._, no shyness.

Knowledge of the exact meaning of what others do or say.

Good manners.

Knowledge of appropriate times and places for doing different things.

Ingenuity in business.

Quick comprehension.

Quick application of remedies, _i.e._, quick and ready resources.

And this part ends with a verse:--

The man who is ingenious and wise, who is accompanied by a friend, and

who knows the intentions of others, as also the proper time and place

for doing everything, can gain over, very easily, even a woman who is

very hard to be obtained.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 31: This term does not apply to a widow, but to a woman who

had probably left her husband, and is living with some other person as a

married woman, maritalement, as they say in France.]

[Footnote 32: Any woman fit to be enjoyed without sin. The object of the

enjoyment of women is twofold, viz., pleasure and progeny. Any woman who

can be enjoyed without sin for the purpose of accomplishing either the

one or the other of these two objects is a Nayika. The fourth kind of

Nayika which Vatsya admits further on is neither enjoyed for pleasure or

for progeny, but merely for accomplishing some special purpose in hand.

The word Nayika is retained as a technical term throughout.]

=END OF PART I.=

PART II.

OF SEXUAL UNION.

CHAPTER I.

KINDS OF SEXUAL UNION ACCORDING TO

(_a_) DIMENSIONS.

(_b_) FORCE OF DESIRE OR PASSION.

(_c_) TIME.

_Kinds of Union._

Man is divided into three classes, viz., the hare man, the bull man, and

the horse man, according to the size of his lingam.

Woman also, according to the depth of her yoni, is either a female deer,

a mare, or a female elephant.

There are thus three equal unions between persons of corresponding

dimensions, and there are six unequal unions, when the dimensions do not

correspond, or nine in all, as the following table shows:

+--------------------+--------------------+

| EQUAL. | UNEQUAL. |

+--------------------+--------------------+

| MEN. | WOMEN. | MEN. | WOMEN. |

+--------+-----------+--------|-----------+

| | | | |

| Hare. | Deer. | Hare. | Mare. |

| Bull. | Mare. | Hare. | Elephant. |

| Horse. | Elephant. | Bull. | Deer. |

| | | Bull. | Elephant. |

| | | Horse. | Deer. |

| | | Horse. | Mare. |

+--------+-----------+--------+-----------+

In these unequal unions, when the male exceeds the female in point of

size, his union with a woman who is immediately next to him in size is

called high union, and is of two kinds; while his union with the woman

most remote from him in size is called the highest union, and is of one

kind only. On the other hand when the female exceeds the male in point

of size, her union with a man immediately next to her in size is called

low union, and is of two kinds; while her union with a man most remote

from her in size is called the lowest union, and is of one kind only.

In other words, the horse and mare, the bull and deer, form the high

union, while the horse and deer form the highest union. On the female

side, the elephant and bull, the mare and hare, form low unions, while

the elephant and the hare make the lowest unions.

There are then, nine kinds of union according to dimensions. Amongst all

these, equal unions are the best, those of a superlative degree, _i.e._,

the highest and the lowest, are the worst, and the rest are middling,

and with them the high[33] are better than the low.

There are also nine kinds of union according to the force of passion or

carnal desire, as follows:

+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+

| MEN. | WOMEN. | MEN. | WOMEN. |

+-----------+-----------+-----------|-----------+

| | | | |

| Small. | Small. | Small. | Middling. |

| Middling. | Middling. | Small. | Intense. |

| Intense. | Intense. | Middling. | Small. |

| | | Middling. | Intense. |

| | | Intense. | Small. |

| | | Intense. | Middling. |

+-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+

A man is called a man of small passion whose desire at the time of

sexual union is not great, whose semen is scanty, and who cannot bear

the warm embraces of the female.

Those who differ from this temperament are called men of middling

passion, while those of intense passion are full of desire.

In the same way, women are supposed to have the three degrees of feeling

as specified above.

Lastly, according to time there are three kinds of men and women, viz.,

the short-timed, the moderate-timed, and the long-timed, and of these as

in the previous statements, there are nine kinds of union.

But on this last head there is a difference of opinion about the female,

which should be stated.

Auddalika says, "Females do not emit as males do. The males simply

remove their desire, while the females, from their consciousness of

desire, feel a certain kind of pleasure, which gives them satisfaction,

but it is impossible for them to tell you what kind of pleasure they

feel. The fact from which this becomes evident is, that males, when

engaged in coition, cease of themselves after emission, and are

satisfied, but it is not so with females."

This opinion is, however, objected to on the grounds that if a male be a

long-timed, the female loves him the more, but if he be short-timed, she

is dissatisfied with him. And this circumstance, some say, would prove

that the female emits also.

But this opinion does not hold good, for if it takes a long time to

allay a woman's desire, and during this time she is enjoying great

pleasure, it is quite natural then that she should wish for its

continuation. And on this subject there is a verse as follows:

"By union with men the lust, desire, or passion of women is satisfied,

and the pleasure derived from the consciousness of it is called their

satisfaction."

The followers of Babhravya, however, say that the semen of women

continues to fall from the beginning of the sexual union to its end, and

it is right that it should be so, for if they had no semen there would

be no embryo.

To this there is an objection. In the beginning of coition the passion

of the woman is middling, and she cannot bear the vigorous thrusts of

her lover, but by degrees her passion increases until she ceases to

think about her body, and then finally she wishes to stop from further

coition.

This objection, however, does not hold good, for even in ordinary things

that revolve with great force, such as a potter's wheel, or a top, we

find that the motion at first is slow, but by degrees it becomes very

rapid. In the same way the passion of the woman having gradually

increased, she has a desire to discontinue coition, when all the semen

has fallen away. And there is a verse with regard to this as follows:

"The fall of the semen of the man takes place only at the end of

coition, while the semen of the woman falls continually, and after the

semen of both has all fallen away then they wish for the discontinuance

of coition."[34]

Lastly, Vatsyayana is of opinion that the semen of the female falls in

the same way as that of the male.

Now some may ask here: If men and women are beings of the same kind, and

are engaged in bringing about the same result, why should they have

different works to do.

Vatsya says that this is so, because the ways of working as well as the

consciousness of pleasure in men and women are different. The difference

in the ways of working, by which men are the actors, and women are the

persons acted upon, is owing to the nature of the male and the female,

otherwise the actor would be sometimes the person acted upon, and vice

versâ. And from this difference in the ways of working follows the

difference in the consciousness of pleasure, for a man thinks, "this

woman is united with me," and a woman thinks, "I am united with this

man."

It may be said that if the ways of working in men and women are

different, why should not there be a difference, even in the pleasure

they feel, and which is the result of those ways.

But this objection is groundless, for the person acting and the person

acted upon being of different kinds, there is a reason for the

difference in their ways of working; but there is no reason for any

difference in the pleasure they feel, because they both naturally derive

pleasure from the act they perform.[35]

On this again some may say that when different persons are engaged in

doing the same work, we find that they accomplish the same end or

purpose: while, on the contrary, in the case of men and women we find

that each of them accomplishes his or her own end separately, and this

is inconsistent. But this is a mistake, for we find that sometimes two

things are done at the same time, as for instance in the fighting of

rams, both the rams receive the shock at the same time on their heads.

Again, in throwing one wood apple against another, and also in a fight

or struggle of wrestlers. If it be said that in these cases the things

employed are of the same kind, it is answered that even in the case of

men and women, the nature of the two persons is the same. And as the

difference in their ways of working arises from the difference of their

conformation only, it follows that men experience the same kind of

pleasure as women do.

There is also a verse on this subject as follows: "Men and women being

of the same nature, feel the same kind of pleasure, and therefore a man

should marry such a woman as will love him ever afterwards."

The pleasure of men and women being thus proved to be of the same kind,

it follows that in regard to time, there are nine kinds of sexual

intercourse, in the same way as there are nine kinds, according to the

force of passion.

There being thus nine kinds of union with regard to dimensions, force of

passion, and time, respectively, by making combinations of them,

innumerable kinds of union would be produced. Therefore in each

particular kind of sexual union, men should use such means as they may

think suitable for the occasion.[36]

At the first time of sexual union the passion of the male is intense,

and his time is short, but in subsequent unions on the same day the

reverse of this is the case. With the female, however, it is the

contrary, for at the first time her passion is weak, and then her time

long, but on subsequent occasions on the same day, her passion is

intense and her time short, until her passion is satisfied.

_On the different kinds of Love._

Men learned in the humanities are of opinion that love is of four kinds,

viz.:

1. Love acquired by continual habit.

2. Love resulting from the imagination.

3. Love resulting from belief.

4. Love resulting from the perception of external objects.

(1). Love resulting from the constant and continual performance and

habit, as for instance the love of sexual intercourse, the love of

hunting, the love of drinking, the love of gambling, etc., etc.

(2). Love which is felt for things to which we are not habituated, and

which proceeds entirely from ideas, is called love resulting from

imagination, as for instance, that love which some men and women and

eunuchs feel for the Auparishtaka or mouth congress, and that which is

felt by all for such things as embracing, kissing, etc., etc.

(3). The love which is mutual on both sides, and proved to be true, when

each looks upon the other as his or her very own, such is called love

resulting from belief by the learned.

(4). The love resulting from the perception of eternal objects is quite

evident and well-known to the world, because the pleasure which it

affords is superior to the pleasure of the other kinds of love, which

exists only for its sake.

What has been said in this chapter upon the subject of sexual union is

sufficient for the learned; but for the edification of the ignorant, the

same will now be treated of at length and in detail.

FOOTNOTES:

[Footnote 33: High unions are said to be better than low ones, for in

the former it is possible for the male to satisfy his own passion

without injuring the female, while in the latter it is difficult for the

female to be satisfied by any means.]

[Footnote 34: The strength of passion with women varies a great deal,

some being easily satisfied, and others eager and willing to go on for a

long time. To satisfy these last thoroughly a man must have recourse to

art. It is certain that a fluid flows from the woman in larger or

smaller quantities, but her satisfaction is not complete until she has

experienced the "spasme génêsique," as described in a French work

recently published and called "Breviare de l'Amour Experimental par le

Dr. Jules Guyot."]

[Footnote 35: This is a long dissertation very common among Sanscrit

authors, both when writing and talking socially. They start certain

propositions, and then argue for and against them. What it is presumed

the author means, is, that though both men and women derive pleasure

from the act of coition, the way it is produced is brought about by

different means, each individual performing his own work in the matter,

irrespective of the other, and each deriving individually their own

consciousness of pleasure from the act they perform. There is a

difference in the work that each does, and a difference in the

consciousness of pleasure that each has, but no difference in the

pleasure they feel, for each feels that pleasure to a greater or lesser

degree.]

[Footnote 36: This paragraph should be particularly noted, for it

specially applies to married men and their wives. So many men utterly

ignore the feelings of the women, and never pay the slightest attention

to the passion of the latter. To understand the subject thoroughly, it

is absolutely necessary to study it, and then a person will know that,

as dough is prepared for baking, so must a woman be prepared for sexual

intercourse, if she is to derive satisfaction from it.]

The Kama Sutra of Vatsyayana Translated From the Sanscrit in Seven Parts With Preface, Introduction and Concluding Remarks · 第 1 / 10 章