TRENTON: ALBERT BRANDT, PUBLISHER, 1900]

In the year 1191, when Spain was desolated by a terrible famine, Dominic

was just finishing his theological studies. He gave away his money and

sold his clothes, his furniture and even his precious manuscripts, that

he might relieve distress. When his companions expressed astonishment

that he should sell his books, Dominic replied: "Would you have me study

off these dead skins, when men are dying of hunger?" This noble

utterance is cherished by his admirers as the first saying from his lips

that has passed to posterity.

Dominic was educated in the schools of Palencia, afterwards a

university, where he devoted six years to the arts and four to theology.

In 1194, when twenty-five years of age, Dominic became a canon regular,

at Osma, under the rule of St. Augustine. Nine years after he

accompanied his bishop, Don Diego, on an embassy for the king of

Castile. When they crossed the Pyrenees they found themselves in an

atmosphere of heresy. The country was filled with preachers of strange

doctrines, who had little respect for Dominic, his bishop, or their

Roman pontiff. The experiences of this journey inspired in Dominic a

desire to aid in the extermination of heresy. He was also deeply

impressed by an important and significant observation. Many of these

heretical preachers were not ignorant fanatics, but well-trained and

cultured men. Entire communities seemed to be possessed by a desire for

knowledge and for righteousness. Dominic clearly perceived that only

preachers of a high order, capable of advancing reasonable argument,

could overthrow the Albigensian heresy.

It would be impossible, in a few words, to tell the whole story of this

Albigensian movement. Undoubtedly the term stood for a variety of

theological opinions, all of which were in opposition to the teachings

of Rome. "From the very invectives of their enemies," says Hallam, "and

the acts of the Inquisition, it is manifest that almost every shade of

heterodoxy was found among these dissidents, till it vanished in a

simple protestation against the wealth and tyranny of the clergy." Many

of the tenets of these enthusiasts were undoubtedly borrowed from the

ancient Manicheism, and would be pronounced heretical by every modern

evangelical denomination. But associated with those holding such

doctrines were numerous reformers, whose chief offense consisted in

their incipient Protestantism. However heretical any of these sects may

have been, it is impossible to make them out enemies to the social

order, except as all opponents of established religious traditions

create disturbance. "What these bodies held in common," says Hardwick,

"and what made them equally the prey of the inquisitor, was their

unwavering belief in the corruption of the medieval church, especially

as governed by the Roman pontiffs."

In 1208 Dominic visited Languedoc a second time, and on his way he

encountered the papal legates returning in pomp to Rome, foiled in their

attempt to crush this growing schism. To them he administered his famous

rebuke: "It is not the display of power and pomp, cavalcades of

retainers, and richly-houseled palfreys, or by gorgeous apparel, that

the heretics win proselytes; it is by zealous preaching, by apostolic

humility, by austerity, by seeming, it is true, but by seeming holiness.

Zeal must be met by zeal, humility by humility, false sanctity by real

sanctity, preaching falsehood by preaching truth." It is extremely

unfortunate for the reputation of Dominic that he ever departed from the

spirit of these noble words, which so clearly state the conditions of

true religious progress.

Dominic now gathered about him a few men of like spirit and began his

task of preaching down heresy. But "the enticing words of man's wisdom"

failed to win the Albigensians from what they believed to be the words

of God. So, unmindful of his admonition to the papal legates, Dominic

obtained permission of Innocent III. to hold courts, before which he

might summon all persons suspected of heresy. When eloquence and courts

failed, the pope let loose the "dogs of war." Then followed twenty years

of frightful carnage, during which hundreds of thousands of heretics

were slain, and many cities were laid waste by fire and sword. "This was

to punish a fanaticism," says Hallam, "ten thousand times more innocent

than their own, and errors which, according to the worst imputations,

left the laws of humanity and the peace of social life unimpaired."

Peace was concluded in 1229, but the persecution of heretics went on.

What part Dominic personally had in these bloody proceedings is

litigated history. His admirers strive to rescue his memory from the

charge that he was "a cruel and bloody man." It is argued that while the

pope and temporal princes carried on the sanguinary war against the

heretics, Dominic confined himself to pleading with them in a spirit of

true Christian love. He was a minister of mercy, not an avenging angel,

sword in hand. It has to be conceded that the constant tradition of the

Dominican order that Dominic was the first Inquisitor, whether he bore

the title or not, rests upon good authority. But what was the nature of

the office as held by the saint? As far as Dominic was concerned, it is

argued by his friends that the office "was limited to the

_reconciliation_ of heretics and had nothing to do with their

_punishment_." It is also claimed that while Dominic did impose

penances, in some cases public flagellation, no evidence can be produced

showing that he ever delivered one heretic to the flames. Those who were

burned were condemned by secular courts, and on the ground that they

were not only heretics but enemies of the public peace and perpetrators

of enormous crimes.

But while it may not be proved that Dominic himself passed the sentence

of death or applied the torch to the faggots with his own hand, he is by

no means absolved from all complicity in those frightful slaughters, or

from all responsibility for the subsequent establishment of the Holy

Inquisition. The principles governing the Inquisition were practically

those upon which Dominic proceeded; the germs of the later atrocities

are to be found in his aims and methods. By what a narrow margin does

Dominic escape the charge of cruelty when it is boasted "that he

resolutely insisted on no sentence being carried out until all means had

been tried by which the conversion of a prisoner could be effected."

Another statement also contains an inkling of a significant fact,

namely, that secular judges and princes were constantly under the

influence of the monks and other ecclesiastical persons, who incited

them to wage war, and to massacre, in the Albigensian war as in other

crusades against heresy. No word from Dominic can be produced indicating

that he remonstrated with the pope, or that he tried to stop the

crusade. In a few instances he seems to have interceded with the crazed

soldiery for the lives of women and children. But he did not oppose the

bloody crusade itself. He was constantly either with the army or

following in its wake. He often sat on the bench at the trial of

dissenters. He remained the life-long friend of Simon de Montfort, the

cruel agent of the papacy, and he blessed the marriage of his sons and

baptized his daughter. Special courts for trying heretics were

established, previous to the more complete organization of the

Inquisition, and in these he held a commission.

The Holy Office of the Inquisition was made a permanent tribunal by

Gregory IX., in 1233, twelve years after the death of Dominic, and

curiously enough, in the same year in which he was canonized. The

Catholic Bollandists claim that although the _title_ of Inquisitor was

of later date than Dominic, yet the _office_ was in existence, and that

the splendor of the Holy Inquisition owes its beginning to that saint.

Certain it is that the administration of the Inquisition was mainly in

the hands of Dominican monks.

In view of all these facts, Professor Allen is justified in his

conclusions respecting Dominic and his share in the persecution of

heretics: "Whatever his own sweet and heavenly spirit according to

Catholic eulogists, his name is a synonym of bleak and intolerant

fanaticism. It is fatally associated with the blackest horrors of the

crusade against the Albigenses, as well as with the infernal skill and

deadly machinery of the Inquisition."

In 1214, Dominic established himself, with six followers, in the house

of Peter Cellani, a rich resident of Toulouse. Eleven years of active

and public life had passed since the Subprior of Osma had forsaken the

quietude of the monastery. He now resumed his life of retirement and

subjected himself and his companions to the monastic rules of prayer and

penance. But the restless spirit of the man could not long remain

content with the seclusion and inactivity of a monk's life. The scheme

of establishing an order of Preaching Friars began to assume definite

shape in his mind. He dreamed of seven stars enlightening the world,

which represented himself and his six friends. The final result of his

deliberations was the organization of his order, and the appearance of

Dominic in the city of Rome, in 1215, to secure the approval of the

pope, Innocent III. Although some describe his reception as "most

cordial and flattering," yet it required supernatural interference to

induce the pope to grant even his approval of the new order. It was not

formally confirmed until 1216 by Honorius III.

Dominic now made his headquarters at Rome, although he traveled

extensively in the interests of his growing brotherhood of monks. He was

made Master of the Sacred Palace, an important official post, including

among its functions the censorship of the press. It has ever since been

occupied by members of the Dominican order.

Throughout his life Dominic is said to have zealously practiced rigorous

self-denial. He wore a hair shirt, and an iron chain around his loins,

which he never laid aside, even in sleep. He abstained from meat and

observed stated fasts and periods of silence. He selected the worst

accommodations and the meanest clothes, and never allowed himself the

luxury of a bed. When traveling, he beguiled the journey with spiritual

instruction and prayers. As soon as he passed the limits of towns and

villages, he took off his shoes, and, however sharp the stones or

thorns, he trudged on his way barefooted. Rain and other discomforts

elicited from his lips nothing but praises to God.

Death came at the age of fifty-one and found him exhausted with the

austerities and labors of his eventful career. He had reached the

convent of St. Nicholas, at Bologna, weary and sick with a fever. He

refused the repose of a bed and bade the monks lay him on some sacking

stretched upon the ground. The brief time that remained to him was

spent in exhorting his followers to have charity, to guard their

humility, and to make their treasure out of poverty. Lying in ashes upon

the floor he passed away at noon, on the sixth of August, 1221. He was

canonized by Gregory IX., in 1234.

_The Dominican Orders_

The origin of the Order of the Preaching Friars has already been

described. It is not necessary to dwell upon the constitution of this

order, because in all essential respects it was like that of the

Franciscans. The order is ruled by a general and is divided into

provinces, governed by provincials. The head of each house is called a

prior. Dominic adopted the rules laid down by St. Augustine, because the

pope ordered him to follow some one of the older monastic codes, but he

also added regulations of his own.

Soon after the founding of the order, bands of monks were sent out to

Paris, to Rome, to Spain and to England, for the purpose of planting

colonies in the chief seats of learning. The order produced many

eminent scholars, some of whom were Thomas Aquinas, Albertus Magnus,

Echard, Tauler and Savonarola.

As among the Franciscans, there was also an Order of Nuns, founded in

1206, and a Third Order, called the Militia of Jesus Christ, which was

organized in 1218.

_The Success of the Mendicant Orders_

In 1215, Innocent III. being pope, the Lateran council passed the

following law: "Whereas the excessive diversity of these [monastic]

institutions begets confusion, no new foundations of this sort must be

formed for the future; but whoever wishes to become a monk must attach

himself to some of the already existing rules." This same pope approved

the two Mendicant orders, urging them, it is true, to unite themselves

to one of the older orders; but, nevertheless, they became distinct

organizations, eclipsing all previous societies in their achievements.

The reason for this disregard of the Lateran decree is doubtless to be

found in the alarming condition of religious affairs at that time, and

in the hope held out to Rome by the Mendicants, of reforming the

monasteries and crushing the heretics.

The failure of the numerous and varied efforts to reform the monastic

institution and the danger to the church arising from the unwonted

stress laid upon poverty by different schismatic religious societies,

necessitated the adoption of radical measures by the church to preserve

its influence. At this juncture the Mendicant friars appeared. The

conditions demanded a modification of the monastic principle which had

hitherto exalted a life of retirement. Seclusion in the cloister was no

longer possible in the view of the remarkable changes in religious

thought and practice.

Innocent III. was wise enough to perceive the immediate utility of the

new societies based upon claims to extraordinary humility and poverty.

The Mendicant orders were, in themselves, not only a rebuke to the

luxurious indolence and shameful laxity of the older orders, but when

sanctioned by the church, the existence of the new societies attested

Rome's desire to maintain the highest and the purest standards of

monastic life. Hence, the Preaching Friars were permitted to reproach

the clergy and the monks for their vices and corruptions.

"The effect of such a band of missionaries," says John Stuart Mill,

"must have been great in rousing and feeding dormant devotional

feelings. They were not less influential in regulating those feelings,

and turning into the established Catholic channels those vagaries of

private enthusiasm which might well endanger the church, since they

already threatened society itself."

Two novel monastic features, therefore, now appear for the first time:

1. The substitution of itineracy for the seclusion of the cloister; and

2. The abolition of endowments.

1. The older orders had their traveling missionaries, but the general

practice was to remain shut up within the monastic walls. The Mendicants

at the start had no particular abiding place, but were bound to travel

everywhere, preaching and teaching. It was distinctly the mission of

these monks to visit the camps, the towns, cities and villages, the

market places, the universities, the homes and the churches, to preach

and to minister to the sick and the poor. They neither loved the

seclusion of the cell nor sought it. Theirs to tramp the dusty roads,

with their capacious bags, begging and teaching. Only by this itinerant

method could the people be reached and the preachers of heresy be

encountered.

2. One of the chief sources of strength in the heretical sects was the

justness of their attack upon the Catholic monastic orders, whose

immense riches belied their vows of poverty. The heretics practiced

austerities and adopted a simplicity of life that won the hearts of the

people, by reason of its contrast to the loose habits of the monks and

clergy. Since it was impossible to reform the older orders, it became

absolutely essential to the success of the Mendicants that they should

rigorously respect the neglected discipline. As the abuse of the vow of

poverty was particularly common, the Mendicants naturally

emphasized this vow.

While it is true that a begging monk was by no means unknown, yet now,

for the first time, was the practice of mendicity formally adopted by

entire orders. Owing to the excessive multiplication of mendicant

societies, Pope Gregory X., at a general council held at Lyons in 1272,

attempted to check the growing evil. The number of Mendicant orders was

confined to four, viz., the Dominicans, the Franciscans, the Carmelites

and the Augustinians or Hermits of Augustine. The Council of Trent

confined mendicity to the Observantines and Capuchins, since the other

societies had practically abandoned their original interpretation of

their vow of poverty and had acquired permanent property.

When Francis tried to enforce the rule of poverty, his rigor gave rise

to most serious dissensions, which began in his own lifetime and ended

after his death in open schism. Some of his followers were not pleased

with his views on that subject. They resisted his extreme strictness,

and after his death they continued to advocate the holding of property.

The popes tried to settle the quarrel, but ever and anon it broke out

afresh with volcanic fierceness. They finally interpreted the rule of

poverty to mean that the friars could not hold property in their own

names, but they might enjoy its use. Under this interpretation of the

rule, the beggars soon became very rich. Matthew of Paris said: "The

friars who have been founded hardly forty years have built even in the

present day in England residences as lofty as the palaces of our kings."

But the better element among the Franciscans refused to consent to such

a palpable evasion of the rule. A portion of this class separated

themselves from the Franciscans, rejected their authority, and formed a

new sect called the _Fratricelli_, or Little Brothers. It is very

important to keep the history of this name clearly in mind, for it

frequently appears in the Reformation period and has been the cause of

much misunderstanding. The word "Fratricelli" came to be a term of

derision applied to any one affecting the dress or the habits of the

monks. When heretical sects arose, it was applied to them as a stigma,

but it was used first by a sect of rigid Franciscans who deserted their

order, adopted this name as their own, and exulted in its use. The

quarrel among the monks led to a variety of complications and is

intricately interwoven with the political and religious history of the

thirteenth, fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. "These rebellious

Franciscans," says Mosheim, "though fanatical and superstitious in some

respects, deserve an eminent rank among those who prepared the way for

the Reformation in Europe, and who excited in the minds of the people a

just aversion to Rome."

The Mendicants were especially active in educational work. This is to be

attributed to several causes. Unquestionably the general and increasing

interest in theological doctrines and the craving for knowledge affected

the monastic orders. Europe was just arousing from her medieval

slumbers. The faint rays of the Reformation dawn were streaking the

horizon. The intellect as well as the conscience was touched by the

Spirit of God. The revolt against moral iniquity was often accompanied

by skepticism concerning the authority and dogmas of the church.

Questions were being asked that ignorant monks could not answer. Too

long had the church ignored these symptoms of the approach of a new

order of things. The church was forced to meet the heretics on their own

ground, to offset the example of their simplicity and purity of life by

exalting the neglected standards of self-denial, and to silence them, if

possible, by exposing their errors. Then came the Franciscans, with

their austere simplicity and their insistence upon poverty. Then also

appeared the Dominicans, or as they were called, "The Watch-dogs of the

Church," who not only barked the church awake, but tried to devour

the heretics.

Francis halted for some time before giving encouragement to educational

enterprises. A life of devotion and prayer attracted him, because, as he

said, "Prayer purifies the affections, strengthens us in virtue, and

unites us to the sovereign good." But, he went on, "Preaching renders

the feet of the spiritual man dusty; it is an employment which

dissipates and distracts, and which causes regular discipline to be

relaxed." After consulting Brother Sylvester and Sister Clara, he

decided to adopt their counsel and entered upon a ministry of preaching.

The example and success of the Dominicans probably inspired the

Franciscans to give themselves more and more to intellectual work.

Both orders received appointments in all the leading universities, but

they did not gain this ascendency without a severe conflict. The regular

professors and the clergy were jealous of them for various causes, and

resisted them at every point. The quarrel between the Dominicans and the

University of Paris is the most famous of these struggles. It began in

1228 and did not end until 1259. The Dominicans claimed the right to two

theological professorships. One had been taken from them, and a law was

passed that no religious order should have what these friars demanded.

The Dominicans rebelled and the University passed sentences of

expulsion. Innocent IV., wishing to become master of Italy, sided with

the University, but the next month he was dead,--in answer to their

prayers, said the Dominicans, but rumor hinted an even blacker cause.

The thirty-one years of the struggle dragged wearily on, disturbed by

papal bulls, appeals, pamphlets and university slogans. At last

Alexander IV., in 1255, decided that the Dominicans might have the

second professorship and also any other they thought proper. The noise

of conflict now grew louder and boded ill for the peace of the church.

The pulpits flashed forth fiery utterances. The monks were assailed in

every quarter. William of Amour published his essay on "The Perils of

the Last Times," in which he claimed that the perilous times predicted

by the Apostle Paul were now fulfilled by these begging friars. He

exposed their iniquities and bitterly complained of their arrogance and

vice. His book was burned and its author banished. Although meaning to

be a friend of Rome, he unconsciously contributed his share to the

coming reform. In 1259, Rome thundered so loud that all Europe was

terrified and the University was awed into submission.

Another interesting feature in the history of their educational

enterprises is the entrance of the Mendicants into England, where they

acted a leading part in the educational and political history of the

country. The Dominicans settled first at Oxford, in 1221. The

Franciscans, after a short stay at Canterbury, went to Oxford in 1224.

The story of how the two Gray friars journeyed from Canterbury to Oxford

runs as follows: "These two forerunners of a famous brotherhood, being

not far from Oxford, lost their way and came to a farmhouse of the

Benedictines. It was nearly night and raining. They gently knocked, and

asked admittance for God's sake. The porter gazed on their patched robes

and beggarly aspect and supposed them to be mimics or despised persons.

The prior, pleased with the tidings, invited them in. But instead of

sportively performing, these two friars insisted, with sedate

countenances, that they were men of God. Whereat the Benedictines in

jealousy, and displeased to be cheated out of their expected fun, kicked

and buffeted the two poor monks and turned them out of doors. One young

monk pitied them and smuggled them into a hay-loft where we trust they

slept soundly and safe from the cold and rain." The two friars finally

reached Oxford and were well received by their Dominican brothers. Such

was the simple beginning of a brilliant career that was profoundly to

affect the course of English history. Both at Cambridge and Oxford the

monastic orders exercised a remarkable influence. Traces of their labors

and power may still be seen in the names of the colleges, and in the

religious portions of the university discipline. They built fine

edifices and manned their schools with the best teachers, so that they

became great rivals of the regular colleges which did not have the funds

necessary to compete with these wealthy beggars. Another cause of their

rapid progress was the exodus of students from Paris to England. During

the quarrel at Paris, Henry III. of England offered many inducements to

the students, who left for England in large numbers. Many of them were

prejudiced in favor of the friars, and they naturally drifted to the

monastic college. The secular clergy charged the friars with inducing

the college students to enter the monasteries or to turn begging monks.

The pope, the king, and the parliament became involved in the struggle,

which grew more bitter as the years passed. After a while Wyclif

appeared, and when he began his mighty attack upon the friars the joy

with which the professors viewed the struggle can be appreciated.

_The Decline of the Mendicants_

The Mendicant friars won their fame by faithful and earnest labors. Men

admired them because they identified themselves with the lowest of

mankind and heroically devoted themselves to the poor and sick. These

"sturdy beggars," as Francis called his companions, were contrasted with

the lazy, rich, and, too often, licentious monks of the other orders.

Everywhere the friars were received with veneration and joy. The people

sought burial in their rags, believing that, clothed in the garments of

these holy beggars, they would enter paradise more speedily.

Instead of seeking the seclusion of the convent to save his own soul,

the friar displayed remarkable zeal trying to save mankind. He became

the arbiter in the quarrels of princes, the prime mover in treaties

between nations, and the indispensable counselor in political

complications. The pope employed him as his authorized agent in the most

difficult matters touching the welfare of the church. His influence upon

the common people is thus described by the historian Green: "The theory

of government wrought out in the cell and lecture-room was carried over

the length and breadth of the land by the Mendicant brother begging his

way from town to town, chatting with the farmer or housewife at the

cottage door and setting up his portable pulpit in village green or

market-place. The rudest countryman learned the tale of a king's

oppression or a patriot's hope as he listened to the rambling,

passionate, humorous discourse of the beggar friar."

By these methods the Mendicants were enabled to render most efficient

service to their patrons at Rome in their efforts to establish their

temporal power. They were, in fact, before the Reformation, just what

the Jesuits afterwards became, "the very soul of the hierarchy." Yes,

they were immensely, prodigiously successful. The popes hastened to do

them honor. Because the friars were such enthusiastic supporters of the

church, the popes poured gold and privileges into their capacious

coffers. Thankful peasants threw in their mites and the admiring noble

bestowed his estates.

The secular clergy, with envy and chagrin, awoke to the alarming fact

that the beggars had won the hearts of the people; their hatred was

increased by the fact that when the Roman pontiffs enriched these

indefatigable toilers and valiant foes of heresy, they did so at the

expense of the bishops and clergy, which, perhaps, was robbing Paul to

pay Peter.

Baluzii says: "No religious order had the distribution of so many and

such ample indulgences as the Franciscans. In place of fixed revenues,

lucrative indulgences were placed in their hands." So ill-judged was the

distribution of these favors that discipline was overturned. Many

churchmen, feeling that their rights were being encroached upon,

complained bitterly, and resolved on retaliation. It is just here that a

potent cause of the Mendicant's fall is to be found. He helped to dig

his own grave.

Having elevated monasticism to the zenith of its power, the Mendicant

orders, like all the other monastic brotherhoods, entered upon their

shameful decline. The unexampled prosperity, so inconsistent with the

original intentions of the founders of the orders, was attended by

corruptions and excesses. The decrees of councils, the denunciations of

popes and high ecclesiastical dignitaries, the satires of literature,

the testimony of chroniclers and the formation of reformatory orders,

constitute a body of irrefragable evidence proving that the lowest level

of sensuality, superstition and ignorance had been reached. The monks

and friars lost whatever vigor and piety they ever possessed.

It is again evident that a monk cannot serve God and mammon. Success

ruins him. Wealth and popular favor change his character. The people

slowly realize the fact that the fat and lazy medieval monk is not dead,

after all, but has simply changed his name to that of Begging Friar. As

Allen neatly observes: "Their gray gown and knotted cord wrapped a

spiritual pride and capacity of bigotry, fully equal to the rest."

Here, then, are the "sturdy beggars" of Francis, dwelling in palatial

convents, arrogant and proud, trampling their ideal into the dust. Thus

it came to pass in accordance with the principle stated at the beginning

of this chapter, that when the ideal became a cloak to cover up sham,

decay had set in, and ruin, even though delayed for years, was sure to

come. The poor, sad-faced, honest, faithful friar everybody praised,

loved and reverenced. The insolent, contemptuous, rich monk all men

loathed. So a change of character in the friar transformed the songs of

praise into shouts of condemnation. Those golden rays from the morning

sun of the Reformation are ascending toward the highest heaven, and

daybreak is near.

A Short History of Monks and Monasteries · 第 25 / 45 题