TOUCHING THE POCKET NERVE.

As for the vast number of the unchurched, they might as well have no

civic rights whatever, for all the attention that is paid to their

sincere convictions. In defiance of the elementary right of religious

liberty, so sedulously professed by politician and priest, millions of

our citizens are informed that if they are not members of some church,

and so getting their share of access to the swag, it is their own fault;

and that they have no right to complain of the robbery of which they are

victims. Since it is impossible to apply direct force, in order to make

every individual become a churchman, the next best ecclesiastical scheme

is to soak him in the pocketbook for not doing so. In other words, the

state is used as a tool to force men and women into the church on the

ground of pecuniary self-interest. The proposition is a brutally plain

one. If they join the church, they get something for the money stolen

from them in the shape of increased taxation; if they remain outside,

the added tax is a dead loss. The idea is worthy of corrupt political

hirelings of a degenerate church, which is out for nothing but profit.

If this is modern Christianity, it is fit only for persons dead to all

sense of honor and of shame.

If all institutions or groups of like-minded individuals received

the benefit of tax exemption, a better defense might be made of the

practice, although it would still involve an injustice toward those who

are perfectly good and useful citizens, in spite of their choice not

to participate in the affairs of any organization. But the favoritism

extended to bodies of a religious nature is at once invidious and

unjust. While the whole theory of our government is hostile to special

privilege, the church arrogates to itself the right to be made

an exception, and to become a particular pet. It ardently craves

parasitism, and is not denied its wish. When other groups of citizens

meet together to consult over their common affairs, or to engage in

common activities, they are not pauperized by the community. If they

occupy land and build upon it, they pay their share of the public

burden, based on the property they possess, just like any other person

or persons, and do not sell their self-respect for the sake of saving a

few dollars. It remains for the one institution which constantly puts

on airs of superior virtue, and which expects to take front seats on all

occasions and to have everybody kowtow to it, to come with the beggar's

whine, and to demand charity of the state. Its dishonesty is only

excelled by its impudence.

Exempting the Churches An Argument for the Abolition of This Unjust and Unconstitutional Practice · 第 18 / 56 题