PREFACE.

————

This reprint is not a facsimile of the edition of 1584, for that was in

black letter, and its page smaller and of quarto size. Being also for

modern readers, and for use, the _i_ of the original has become, where

necessary, the _j_ of the second edition; the _u_ and _v_ have been

altered according to modern usage, that is, generally interchanged;

while the short _s_ replaces the _ſ_. Such modernisations render it

more readable by the historical and philosophical student, by the

man of science, and by the psychological physician, willing to learn

all that may instruct himself and benefit others. Neither would this

reprint have been undertaken, unless the work itself had appeared to

my friend and fellow-student, W. T. Gairdner, M.D., LL.D., Professor

of Medicine in the University of Glasgow,—and led by him—to myself and

others, worthy on the above-mentioned grounds, of being reproduced, and

as being both in matter and style a valuable English classic.

While, however, it is not a facsimile, yet, excepting such variations

as are above noticed, and allowing for the few and trifling errors from

which no copy can expect to be free, not even a photographic one, as

experts in these matters well know, this will, I believe, be found a

correct reprint. Every proof has been thrice, and sometimes oftener,

read over with the original by myself, and these efforts have been

well supplemented by the intelligence and care of its printers. Even

the word-errors of the original, where not in its list of errata, have

been retained, though the true or conjectural readings have been given

in the margin, or in two or three instances in the Notings at the end.

Except also in two instances, where for necessity’s sake alterations

have been introduced within []s, and the original given in the margin,

the old punctuation has been retained, it being, as a rule, very good,

while any slight slips are readily observed, and do not affect the

sense. For such other differences as are due to the black letter, and

for others like these, I would refer the print-studying reader to the

Introduction.

In the biographical portion of this Introduction, besides a supposition

or two of my own, which from his writings seem to me highly probable,

there have been given notices of his pedigree, age, and marriages,

matters hitherto unknown or misstated, and for which I would at once

record my indebtedness to Edmund Ward Oliver, Esq. This gentleman

having taken an interest in investigating these questions, and being a

perfect stranger to me, wrote and offered the results of his inquiries

so soon as he had learnt that I was engaged with this reprint, and has

since most obligingly answered the various questions that I have had

occasion to put to him. A copy of Scot’s Will has been also for the

first time published, and some Notes and a Glossary added. Were I to

have imitated the learned editors of former days, I should have added,

not some, but exhaustive notes on every point, gathered from every

known and unknown source; but I have confined myself to explanation, or

to making a few remarks on the text, giving also the author’s agreement

with, or obligations to Wier, so far as I knew them, and Shakespeare’s

and Middleton’s obligations to himself; my reason for not entering into

greater details being that I am no student of the pseudo-science of

witchcraft, but a student only of what is useful, and true, and good.

It would be unseemly, especially after mentioning Mr. Oliver’s name,

were I to close this without acknowledging the kind assistance of

my well-known friend, James Gairdner, Esq., of the Public Record

Office; of my Shakespearian friends, W. Aldis Wright, LL.D., and P.

A. Daniel, Esq.; of that given me by the Very Reverend Father W. H.

Eyre, lately Superior of Stonyhurst; by Mrs. Amelia Green; as also by

Prof. W. W. Skeat, and Dr. J. A. H. Murray, in my Glossary; though all

were, and personally are, strangers; as are Miss Kath. P. Woolrych,

Oare Vicarage, Kent, and Miss Ayscough, of Brabourne Vicarage; and

especially that given me by my other Shakespearian friends, the Rev.

W. H. Harrison, of St. Anne’s, South Lambeth, and W. G. Stone, Esq.

My best thanks are also due to Mr. J. J. Jervis for the use, for the

printer, of a partially incomplete copy of the first edition; to the

University of Glasgow for the loan, for my own use, for the greater

part of a year, of another copy of this first edition; and for the

use for the same period of a copy of the third edition to my Alma

Mater of Edinburgh, endeared to me by the teachings, remembrances, and

kindnesses of Sir William Hamilton, Allan Thomson, Christison, Traill,

Jamieson, that most sagacious of surgeons and teachers, Syme, and the

ever-to-be-revered physician and man, W. Pulteney Alison.

The Discoverie of Witchcraft · 第 3 / 97 题