IX.

I should not do my whole duty if I did not make some reference to the

“holy kiss,” nor yet contribute what I can to enlighten the mothers who

honor me by reading my book concerning the universal but almost

unspeakable questions that are always coming into the minds of young

people about this sacred form of salute. _You_ may know as much about

these questions as I do, perhaps more; but there is many a mother who

never dreamed that they could infest any brain but her own, and she

never dared speak of such a thing.

One girl came to me, her face suffused with blushes, but with a

determined expression about her mouth, and said:—

“I am going to ask you something right out plain, because I think you

will not laugh. I’ve never dared ask anybody yet, because everybody

always laughs in such a mean way if you try to find out anything about

such things; and I’d like to know how girls are going to know just what

to do. Now it’s just this way: I am going with Charley, and he is a nice

boy; he wants to do what is right, I know he does, but all the boys have

such queer ideas about their ‘rights.’ When he takes me home from church

or any place—and I’ve just got so I dread to have him; and sometimes I

think I won’t go with another boy as long as I live, because, you see,

when I go to say ‘Good night,’ he—he thinks I am so queer because I

won’t let him kiss me. But I won’t; I never let anybody but my own

folks. I don’t like it. I don’t think it’s nice to do that way unless

it’s somebody you’re sure of, and love very much. He says I’m queer; and

he gets provoked, and says it’s his right, if he goes with me. Now I

want to know—is it?”

“No; it is not,” I said, positively, and perhaps with a little flavor of

indignation. “And no properly instructed young man would make such a

claim. He is not to blame, of course,” I added more mildly, “for he is

young, too; but your instincts are all right; they are true; they are of

God who made the kiss, and gave it its own place in common human

language. It belongs to the home, and to the purest Christian fellowship

between man and man, woman and woman; _to society, never_.”

“Oh, I am so glad I asked you!” she said; “for I was sure my feeling

about it was right. But you know one doesn’t like to offend one’s

friend, and one doesn’t like to be called queer. But what does make boys

act so,—good boys, too, for Charley _is_ a good boy?”

I can not bring into the compass of these pages all that followed in our

talk, but I would like to give the points of truth to the young mothers

for whom I write.

The answer to my young questioner is found in the fact that boys, as

well as girls, have been left in ignorance of the principle, as it is in

God, of which the kiss is one form of expression, and have been left to

catch up its perversion as Satan has undertaken to work it into custom

and habit, in the world. Anything which Satan can not wholly spoil, he

will counterfeit; or, better yet for his purpose, make so common, if

possible, that it shall become worthless, as was the case with silver in

the days of Solomon, when it became as the stones of the street, and

“was nothing accounted of.”

The kiss, made common, is ridiculous. To be worth anything, it must

speak exclusively the language of a pure, changeless affection, such as

is represented in the love of God for his children. It belongs more to

the parent and child, brother and sister, than to friend and companion.

It is, as before intimated, fraternal, not social. As soon as any

attempt is made to drag it into society, it becomes disgusting, and is

always soon driven out by storms of ridicule. Therefore good form has

taken it in hand, and has determined its sphere and office with the most

arbitrary insistence. And again the voice of society is but an echo of

the voice of truth and purity. Good form has decreed that the kiss,

public and indiscriminate, is either an indication of unmitigated

rusticity, of shameless immorality, or is to be understood as a

joke,—very funny on its first spontaneous utterance, but very flat if

repeated. Indulged in private, outside the sacred boundaries of the

family, between men and women, it is unpardonable,—unatonable, at least

as far as the woman is concerned. Good form requires that every young

lady shall be so well trained that she will keep her lips absolutely

untouched for her husband, _after_ the words have been spoken that make

him her husband.

The “betrothal kiss” of the romancer has been brought under suspicion in

real life by the fact that betrothal is, in our day, not by any means

equivalent to marriage; and the young man who knows the world, and yet

sufficiently regards truth and purity to seek them in a wife, would

vastly prefer to find his lady friend rigidly determined to keep her

lips to herself as long as they two are yet twain, rather than to find

them always at even his command.

In the correspondence that has come to me as a result of “Studies in

Home and Child Life,” is to be found pitiful evidence of the ignorance

in which young people are allowed to grow up, even in a matter which may

seem, like this one, trivial and bordering on the ridiculous.

The habit among children of kissing everybody is little short of

vicious. Kissing games of every description are considered vulgar,

anywhere outside the immediate family circle, and even then, because of

the trend of habit, they are not good form.

There is great possibility of infection in the kiss. The remains of old

teeth, the breath and lips of those who are in any wise diseased, make

kissing dangerous. It is well-nigh impossible to find a clean, sweet

mouth in these days of human degeneracy; and because of these facts the

little children are exposed to every malignant disorder that is afloat,

and many that are hidden deep in the foul cisterns of the broken-down

body of grandparents, father, mother, and the strangers who straggle in

and use their “rights” on the freely rendered lips of the little

innocents.

The warnings of science, of which so many make light, are timely, and

should be religiously regarded as the authority of God by every one who

does not know within himself that he has so faithfully brought his whole

being into conformity with every law of life and health that he is clean

through and through, so that the sensitive lips of his babe can come to

his with the same certainty of a blessing in the caress that the bee has

when he goes to the white clover of the meadow.

He, and he only, who has brought himself fully into harmony with both

the letter and the spirit of Isaiah fifty-eight may freely give his lips

to his child, out of which to drink his fill of love. And the home that

is brought into this beautiful accord with Christ may be as the garden

of the Lord, from which all lips shall, with every caress, gather that

word of life that is sweeter than honey.

Good Form and Christian Etiquette · 第 10 / 16 题