Much might be said of different methods and materials of work in

decorative painting, but I have hardly space here. The decorative

painter prefers a certain flatness of effect, and therefore such methods

as fresco, in which the colours are laid on while the plaster ground is

wet, and tempera naturally appeal to him. In the latter the colours

ground in water and used with size, or white and yolk of egg, or

prepared with starch, worked on a dry ground, drying lighter than when

they are put on, have a peculiar luminous quality, while the surface is

free from any gloss. Both these methods need direct painting and

finishing as the work proceeds.

By a method of working in ordinary oil colours on a ground of fibrous

plaster, using rectified spirit of turpentine or benzine as a medium,

much of the quality of fresco or tempera may be obtained, with the

advantage that the plaster ground may be a movable panel.

There are, however, other fields for the decorative painter than wall

painting; as, for instance, domestic furniture, which may vary in degree

of elaboration from the highly ornate cassone or marriage coffer of

Mediaeval Italy to the wreaths and sprays which decked chairs and

bed-posts even within our century. There has been of late some revival

of painting as applied chiefly to the panels of cabinets, or the

decoration of piano fronts and cases.

The same causes produce the same results. With the search after, and

desire for, beauty in life, we are again driven to study the laws of

beauty in design and painting; and in so doing painters will find again

the lost thread, the golden link of connection and intimate association

with the sister arts and handicrafts, whereof none is before or after

another, none is greater or less than the other.

WALTER CRANE.

OF WALL PAPERS

While the tradition and practice of mural painting as applied to

interior walls and ceilings of houses still linger in Italy, in the form

of often skilful if not always tasteful tempera work, in more western

countries, like England, France, and America, under the economic

conditions and customs of commercial civilisation, with its smoky

cities, and its houses built by the hundred to one pattern, perhaps, and

let on short terms, as regards domestic decoration--except in the case

of a few wealthy freeholders--mural painting has ceased to exist. Its

place has been taken by what after all is but a substitute for it,

namely, wall paper.

I am not aware that any specimen of wall paper has been discovered that

has claims to any higher antiquity than the sixteenth century, and it

only came much into use in the last, increasing in the present, until it

has become well-nigh a universal covering for domestic walls, and at the

same time has shown a remarkable development in design, varying from

very unpretending patterns and printings in one colour to elaborate

block-printed designs in many colours, besides cheap machine-printed

papers, where all the tints are printed from the design on a roller at

once.

Since Mr. William Morris has shown what beauty and character in pattern,

and good and delicate choice of tint can do for us, giving in short a

new impulse in design, a great amount of ingenuity and enterprise has

been spent on wall papers in England, and in the better kinds a very

distinct advance has been made upon the patterns of inconceivable

hideousness, often of French origin, of the period of the Second

Empire--a period which perhaps represents the most degraded level of

taste in decoration generally.

The designer of patterns for wall papers heretofore has been content to

imitate other materials, and adapt the characteristics of the patterns

found, say, in silk damask hangings or tapestry, or even imitate the

veining of wood, or marble, or tiles; but since the revival of interest

in art, the study of its history, and knowledge of style, a new impulse

has been given, and patterns are constructed with more direct reference

to their beauty, and interest as such, while strictly adapted to the

methods of manufacture. Great pains are often taken by our principal

makers to secure good designs and harmonious colourings, and though a

manufacturer and director of works is always more or less controlled by

the exigencies of the market and the demands of the tentative

salesman--considerations which have no natural connection with art,

though highly important as economic conditions affecting its

welfare--very remarkable results have been produced, and a special

development of applied design may almost be said to have come into

existence with the modern use of wall papers. The manufacture suffers

like most others from the keenness and unscrupulousness of commercial

competition, which leads to the production of specious imitations of

_bona fide_ designs, and unauthorised use of designs originally intended

for other purposes, and this of course presses unfairly upon the more

conscientious maker, so long as the public do not decline to be

deceived.

English wall papers are made in lengths 21 inches wide. French wall

papers are 18 inches wide. This has probably been found most convenient

in working in block-printing: it is obvious to any one who has seen the

printers at work that a wider block than 21 inches would be unwieldy,

since the block is printed by hand, being suspended from above by a

cord, and guided by the workman's hand from the well of colour, into

which it is dipped, to the paper flat on a table before him.

The designer must work to the given width, and though his design may

vary in depth, must never exceed 21 inches square, except where double

blocks are used. His main business is to devise his pattern so that it

will repeat satisfactorily over an indefinite wall space without running

into awkward holes or lines. It may be easy enough to draw a spray or

two of leaves or flowers which will stand by themselves, but to combine

them in an organic pattern which shall repeat pleasantly over a wall

surface requires much ingenuity and a knowledge of the conditions of the

manufacture, apart from play of fancy and artistic skill.

One way of concealing the joints of the repeat of the pattern is by

contriving what is called a drop-repeat, so that, in hanging, the

paper-hanger, instead of placing each repeat of pattern side by side, is

enabled to join the pattern at a point its own depth below, which varies

the effect, and arranges the chief features or masses on an alternating

plan.

The modern habit of regarding the walls of a room chiefly as a

background to pictures, furniture, or people, and perhaps the smallness

of the average room, has brought rather small, thickly dispersed, leafy

patterns into vogue, retiring in colour for the most part. While,

however, we used to see rotund and accidental bunches of roses (the

pictorial or sketchy treatment of which contrasted awkwardly with their

formal repetition), we now get a certain sense of adaptation, and the

necessity of a certain flatness of treatment; and most of us who have

given much thought to the subject feel that when natural forms are dealt

with, under such conditions, suggestion is better than any attempt at

realisation, or naturalistic or pictorial treatment, and that a design

must be constructed upon some systematic plan, if not absolutely

controlled by a geometric basis.

Wall papers are printed from blocks prepared from designs, the outlines

of which are reproduced by means of flat brass wire driven edgeways into

the wood block. One block for each tint is used. First one colour is

printed on a length of paper, a piece of 12 yards long and 21 inches

wide, which is passed over sticks suspended across the workshop. When

the first colour is dry the next is printed, and so on; the colours

being mixed with size and put in shallow trays or wells, into which the

blocks are dipped.

A cheaper kind is printed by steam power from rollers on which the

design has been reproduced in the same way by brass wire, which holds

the colour; but in the case of machine-printed papers all the tints are

printed at once. Thus the pattern is often imperfect and blurred.

A more elaborate and costly kind of wall paper is that which is stamped

and gilded, in emulation of stamped and gilded leather, which it

resembles in effect and quality of surface. For this method the design

is reproduced in relief as a _repoussee_ brass plate, and from this a

mould or matrix is made, and the paper being damped is stamped in a

press into the matrix, and so takes the pattern in relief, which is

generally covered with white metal and lacquered to a gold hue, and this

again may be rubbed in with black, which by filling the interstices

gives emphasis to the design and darkens the gold to bronze; or the

gilded surface may be treated in any variety of colour by means of

painting or lacquer, or simply relieved by colouring the ground.

But few of us own our own walls, or the ground they stand upon: but few

of us can afford to employ ourselves or skilled artists and craftsmen

in painting our rooms with beautiful fancies: but if we can get

well-designed repeating patterns by the yard, in agreeable tints, with a

pleasant flavour perchance of nature or antiquity, for a few shillings

or pounds, ought we not to be happy? At all events, wall-paper makers

should naturally think so.

WALTER CRANE.

FICTILES

Earliest amongst the inventions of man and his endeavour to unite Art

with Craft is the Fictile Art. His first needs in domestic life, his

first utensils, his first efforts at civilisation, came from the Mother

Earth, whose son he believed himself to be, and his ashes or his bones

returned to Earth enshrined in the fictile vases he created from their

common clay. And these Fictiles tell the story of his first

Art-instincts, and of his yearnings to unite beauty with use. They tell,

too, more of his history than is enshrined and preserved by any other

art; for almost all we know of many a people and many a tongue is

learned from the fictile record, the sole relic of past civilisations

which the Destroyer Time has left us.

Begun in the simplest fashion, fashioned by the simplest means, created

from the commonest materials, Fictile Art grew with man's intellectual

growth, and Fictile Craft grew with his knowledge; the latter

conquering, in this our day, when the craftsman strangles the artist

alike in this as in all other arts. To truly foster and forward the art,

the craftsman and the artist should, where possible, be united, or at

least should work in common, as was the case when, in each civilisation,

the Potter's Art flourished most, and when the scientific base was of

less account than was the art employed upon it. In its earliest stages

the local clay sufficed for the formative portion of the work, and the

faiences of most European countries offer more artistic results to us

than do the more scientifically compounded porcelains. In the former

case the native clay seemed more easily to ally itself with native art,

to record more of current history, to create artistic genius rather than

to be content with attempting to copy misunderstood efforts of other

peoples and other times. But when science ransacked the earth for

foreign bodies and ingredients, foreign decorative ideas came with them

and Fictile Art was no more a vernacular one. It attempted to disguise

itself, to show the craftsman superior to the artist; and then came the

Manufacturer and the reign of quantity over quality, the casting in

moulds by the gross and the printing by the thousands. Be it understood

these remarks only apply to the introduction of porcelain into Europe.

In the East where the clay is native, the art is native; the potter's

hand and the wheel yet maintain the power of giving the potter his

individuality as the creator and the artist, and save him from being but

the servant and the slave of a machine.

Between faience and porcelain comes, midway, Stoneware, in which many

wonderfully, and some fearfully, made things have been done of late, but

which possesses the combined qualities of faience and porcelain--the

ease of manipulation of the former, and the hardness and durability of

the latter; but the tendency to over-elaborate the detail of its

decoration, and rely less on the beauty of its semi-glossy surface than

on meretricious ornament, has rather spoiled a very hopeful movement in

Ceramic Art. Probably the wisest course to pursue at the present would

be to pay more attention to faiences decorated with simple glazes or

with "slip" decoration, and this especially in modelled work. A

continuation of the artistic career of the Della Robbia family is yet an

unfulfilled desideratum, notwithstanding that glazed faiences have never

since their time ceased to be made, and that glazed figure work of large

scale prevailed in the eighteenth century. Unglazed terra cotta, an

artistic product eminently suited to our climate and to our urban

architecture, has but partially developed itself, and this more in the

direction of moulded and cast work than that of really plastic art; and

albeit that from its dawn to this present the Fictile Art has been

exercised abundantly, its role is by no means exhausted. The artist and

the craftsman have yet a wide field before them, but it would be well

that the former should, for some while to come, take the lead. Science

has too long reigned supreme in a domain wherein she should have been

not more than equal sovereign. She has had her triumphs, great triumphs

too, triumphs which have been fraught with good in an utilitarian sense,

but she has tyrannised too rigidly over the realm of Art. Let us now try

to equalise the dual rule.

G. T. ROBINSON.

METAL WORK

In discussing the artistic aspect of metal work, we have to take into

account the physical properties and appropriate treatment of the

following metals: the precious metals, gold and silver; copper, both

pure and alloyed with other metals, especially tin and zinc in various

proportions to form the many kinds of brass and bronze; lead, with a

group of alloys of which pewter is typical; and iron, in the three forms

of cast iron, wrought iron, and steel. All these have been made to serve

the purpose of the artist, and the manipulation of them, while

presenting many differences in detail, presents certain broad

characteristics in common which distinguish them from the raw material

of other crafts. Whether they are found native in the metallic state as

is usual in the case of gold, or combined with many other minerals in

the form of ore as is more common with other metals, fire is the primal

agency by which they are made available for our needs. The first stage

in their manipulation is to melt and cast them into ingots of a size

convenient to the purpose intended. Secondly, all these metals when

pure, and many alloys, are in varying degree malleable and ductile, are,

in fact, if sufficient force be applied, plastic. Hence arises the first

broad division in the treatment of metals. The fluid metal may, by the

use of suitable moulds, be cast at once to the shape required, or the

casting may be treated merely as the starting-point for a whole series

of operations--forging, rolling, chipping, chasing, wire-drawing, and

many more. Another property of the metals which must be noticed is, that

not only can separate masses of metals be melted down and fused into

one, but it is possible, under various conditions, of which the one

invariably necessary is perfectly clean surfaces of contact, to unite

separate portions of the same or different metals without fusion of the

mass. For our present purpose the most important instance of this is the

process of soldering, by which two surfaces are united by the

application of sufficient heat to melt more fusible metal which is

introduced between them, and which combines with both so as firmly to

unite them on solidifying. Closely allied to this are the processes by

which one metal is, for purposes of adornment or preservation from

corrosion, coated with a thin film or deposit of another, usually more

costly, metal.

Though hereafter electro-metallurgy may assert its claim to artistic

originality as a third division, for the present all metal work, so far

as its artistic aspect depends upon process, falls naturally into one of

the two broad divisions of cast metal and wrought metal. Both have been

employed from a time long anterior to written history; ornaments of

beaten gold, and tools of cast bronze, are alike found among the relics

of very early stages of civilisation, and in early stages both alike are

artistic. The choice between the two processes is determined by such

considerations as convenience of manufacture and the physical properties

of the metals, and the different purposes in view. When a thick and

comparatively massive shape is required, it is often easier to cast it

at once. For thinner and lighter forms it is usually more convenient to

treat the ingot or crude product of the furnace as mere raw material for

a long series of workings under the hammer, or its patent mechanical

equivalents, the rolling and pressing mills of modern mechanics. The

choice is further influenced by the toughness generally characteristic

of wrought metal, whereas the alloys which yield the cleanest castings

are by no means universally the best in other respects. Iron is the

extreme instance of this: ordinary cast iron being an impure form of the

metal, which is too brittle to be worked under the hammer, but is

readily cast into moulds, being fluid at a temperature which, though

high, is easily obtained in a blast furnace. Wrought iron, however,

which is usually obtained from cast iron by a process called puddling,

whereby the impurities are burnt out, does not become fluid enough to

pour into moulds; but on the other hand, pieces at a white heat can be

united into a solid mass by skilful hammering, a process which is called

welding, and, together with the fact that from its great hardness it is

usually worked hot, is specially distinctive of the blacksmith's craft.

In no other metal is the separation between the two branches so wide as

in iron. The misdirected skill of some modern iron-founders has caused

the name of cast iron to be regarded as the very negative of art, and

has even thrown suspicion on the process of casting itself as one of

questionable honesty. Nevertheless, as a craft capable of giving final

shape to metal, it has manifestly an artistic aspect, and, in fact,

bronze statuary, a fine art pure and simple, is reproduced from the

clay model merely by moulding and casting. We must therefore look for

the artistic conditions in the preparation of the model or pattern, the

impress of which in sand or loam forms the mould; the pattern may be

carved in wood or modelled in clay, but the handling of the wood or clay

is modified by the conditions under which the form is reproduced. And

lastly, the finished object may either retain the surface formed as the

metal solidifies, as in the case of the bronzes cast by the wax process,

or the skin may be removed by the use of cutting tools, chisels and

files and gravers, so that, as in the case of many of the better French

bronzes, the finished work is strictly carved work. On the contrary,

much silversmith's work, as well as such simple objects as Chinese gongs

and Indian "lotahs," after being cast approximately to shape are

finished by hammer work, that is, treated as plastic material with tools

that force the material into shape instead of cutting the shape out of

the mass by removing exterior portions of material. Attempts to imitate

both processes by casting only, thus dispensing with the cost of

finishing, are common, but as they dispense likewise with all beauty in

the product, even if they do not substitute varnished and tinted zinc

for better metal, their success is commercial only.

We have thus three characteristic kinds of surface resulting from the

conditions of treatment, marking out three natural divisions of the art:

and be it noted that questions of surface or texture are all-important

in the arts; beauty is skin deep. First, the natural skin of the metal

solidified in contact with the mould, and more or less closely

imitative of the surface of the original model, usually for our purposes

a plastic surface; secondly, there is carved, technically called chased,

work; and thirdly, beaten or wrought work, which in ornament is termed

embossing.

Superimposed on these we have the cross divisions of the crafts

according to the special metal operated on, and in the existing

industrial organisation the groups thus obtained have to be further

divided into many sub-heads, according to the articles produced; and

finally, another commercial distinction has to be drawn which greatly

affects the present condition of handicraft, that is, the division of

the several trades into craftsmen and salesmen. There can be no doubt

that the extent of the existing dissociation of the producing craftsman

from the consumer is an evil for the arts, and that the growing

preponderance of great stores is inimical to excellence of workmanship.

It is, perhaps, an advantage for the workman to be relieved from the

office of salesman; the position of the village smith plying his calling

in face of his customers might not suit every craft, but the services of

the middleman are dearly bought at the price of artistic freedom. It is

too often in the power of the middleman to dictate the quality of

workmanship, too often his seeming interest to ordain that it shall be

bad.

The choice of a metal for any particular purpose is determined by

physical properties combined with considerations of cost. Iron, if only

for its cheapness, is the material for the largest works of metal; while

in the form of steel it is the best available material for many very

small works, watch-springs for instance: it has the defect of liability

to rust; the surfaces of other metals may tarnish, but iron rusts

through. For the present only one application of cast iron concerns

us--its use for grates and stoves. The point to remember is, that as the

material has but little beauty, its employment should be restricted to

the quantity prescribed by the demands of utility. Wrought iron, on the

contrary, gives very great scope to the artist, and it offers this

peculiar advantage, that the necessity of striking while the iron is hot

enforces such free dexterity of handling in the ordinary smith, that he

has comparatively little to learn if set to produce ornamental work, and

thus renewed interest in the art has found craftsmen enough who could

readily respond to the demand made upon them.

Copper, distinguished among metals by its glowing red tint, has as a

material for artistic work been overshadowed by its alloys, brass and

bronze; partly because they make sounder castings, partly it is to be

feared from the approach of their colour to gold. Holding an

intermediate position between iron and the precious metals, they are the

material of innumerable household utensils and smaller architectural

fittings.

Lead, tin, and zinc scarcely concern the artist to-day, though neither

plumber nor pewterer has always been restricted to plain utilitarianism.

Gold and silver have been distinguished in all ages as the precious

metals, both for their comparative rarity and their freedom from

corrosion, and their extreme beauty. They are both extremely malleable

and very readily worked. Unhappily there is little original English work

being done in these metals. The more ordinary wares have all life and

feeling taken out of them by mechanical finish, an abrasive process

being employed to remove every sign of tool-marks. The all-important

surface is thus obliterated. As to design, fashion oscillates between

copies of one past period and another. A comparison of one of these

copies with an original will make the distinction between the work of a

man paid to do his quickest and one paid to do his best clearer than

volumes of description. Indeed, when all is said, a writer can but

indicate the logic that underlies the craft, or hint at the relation

which subsists between the process, the material, and the finished ware:

the distinction between good and bad in art eludes definition; it is not

an affair of reason, but of perception.

W. A. S. BENSON.

STONE AND WOOD CARVING

The crafts of the stone and wood carver may fairly be taken in review at

the same time, although they differ in themselves.

Arts and Crafts Essays by Members of the Arts and Crafts Exhibition Society · 第 2 / 15 段