By Charles H. Heimsath

So far as I know, the first mention of the legend of the “Blue Lady” is

in the Memorial of Fray Alonso de Benavides, 1630. Benavides was

(1621–1629) Father Custodian of the province of New Mexico, and his

Memorial was written to present Philip IV of Spain an account of the

“treasures spiritual and temporal” which that remote province

contained. In the course of this highly entertaining document Benavides

recounts at length, and with pious zeal, the miraculous conversion of

the Jumano tribe of Indians. Benavides was at that time (probably 1629)

somewhere in the upper Rio Grande valley. In this region, he states,

the Jumano Indians had been demanding missionaries for “years back.”

Finally he granted the missionaries.

“And before they went,” to quote the document literally, “[we]

asked the Indians to tell us the reason why they were with so much

concern petitioning us for baptism, and for Religious to go and

indoctrinate them. They replied that a woman like that one whom we

had there painted—which was a picture of the Mother Luisa de

Carrion—used to preach to each one of them in their own tongue,

telling them that they should come and summon the Fathers to

instruct and baptize them, and that they should not be slothful

about it. And that the woman who preached was dressed precisely

like her who was painted there; but that the face was not like that

one, but that she [their visitant] was young and beautiful. And

always whenever Indians came newly from those nations, looking upon

the picture and comparing it among themselves, they said that the

clothing was the same but the face was not, because the face of the

woman who preached to them was that of a young and beautiful girl.”

[96]

Another early reference to this mysterious lady appears in a letter of

Fray Damian Manzanet to Don Carlos de Sigüenza y Gongora, 1690. In it

the writer goes on to say as follows:

“At that time I was living in the Mission Caldera, in the province

of Coahuila, whither I had gone with the intention of seeing

whether I could make investigations and obtain information about

the country to the north and northeast, on account of facts

gathered from a letter now in my possession, which had been given

in Madrid to the Father Antonio Linaz. This letter treats of what

the blessed Mother Maria de Jesus de Agreda made known to the

Father Custodian of New Mexico, Fray Alonso de Benavides. And the

blessed Mother tells of having been frequently to New Mexico and to

the Gran Quivira, adding that eastward from the Gran Quivira are

the kingdoms of the Ticlas, Theas, and Caburcol. She also says that

these are not exactly the names belonging to these kingdoms, but

come close to the real names. Because of this information brought

by me from Spain, together with the fact of my call to the ministry

for the conversion of the heathen, I had come over and dwelt in the

missions of Coahuila.” [97]

And in the same letter a little further on Manzanet recounts this

incident:

“For lack of more time I shall only add what is the most noteworthy

of all, namely this: While we were at the Tejas Hasinai village,

after we had distributed clothing to the Indians and to the

governor of the Tejas, that governor asked me for a piece of blue

baize in which to bury his mother when she died; I told him that

cloth would be more suitable, and he answered that he did not want

any other color than blue. I then asked him what mysterious reason

he had for preferring the blue color, and in reply he said they

were very fond of that color, particularly for burial clothes,

because in times past they had been visited frequently by a

beautiful woman, who used to come down from the hills, dressed in

blue garments, and that they wished to do as that woman had done.

On my asking whether that had been long since, the governor said

that it had been before his time, but his mother, who was aged, had

seen that woman, as had also other old people. From this it is

easily to be seen that they referred to the Madre Maria de Jesus de

Agreda, who was frequently in those regions, as she herself

acknowledged to the Father Custodian of New Mexico, her last visit

being in 1631, the last fact being evident from her own statement,

made to the Father Custodian of New Mexico.” [98]

It appears, therefore, that after the publication of his Memorial in

1630, Benavides visited Maria de Jesus de Agreda. She was already

famous because of the publication of her La Mistica de Dios Historia

Divina de la Virgin, Madre de Dios in 1627, [99] in which she recounts,

among other preposterous things, what happened to the Virgin while she

was in the womb. The mind of this woman, therefore, filled with the

most extravagant fancies, was fertile for the story of Benavides. She

immediately assumed the identity of the unknown female missionary; and,

in the course of the visit, which lasted probably two weeks, elaborated

fully the exact method of the holy visitations. Benavides with his

charming medieval mind readily accepted her story. Because of the

prominence of the two, and because of the universal interest in the New

World, it obtained rapid and wide circulation and credence.

The story must have reached America quickly. Manzanet, in the above

quotations, speaks of it as being in general circulation thirty years

later. That it spread is also indicated by the fact that De Leon in a

letter, May, 1689, accounts for the religious knowledge of the Texas

(or Tejas) Indians through the ministration of a woman. The following

extract from his letter reveals the fact that he was not so well

acquainted with the Benavides account as Manzanet had been:

“They [the Texas] are very familiar with the fact that there is

only one true God, that he is in Heaven, and that he was born of

the Holy Virgin. They perform many Christian rites, and the Indian

Governor asked me for missionaries to instruct them, saying that

many years ago a woman went inland to instruct them, but that she

has not been there for a long time; and certainly it is a pity that

people so rational, who plant crops and know there is a God, should

have no one to teach them the Gospel, especially when the province

of Texas is so large and so fertile and has so fine a climate.”

[100]

And Shea asserts that “the Franciscan writers all from this time [when

Benavides published his account] speak of this marvelous conversion of

the Xumanos by her instrumentality as a settled fact.” [101] The legend

must have had wide acceptance in the Southwest in the last half of the

seventeenth century. Among the important historians who take account of

it are Bolton, Chapman, and Hodge. Bolton calls the story a “classic in

the lore of the Southwest”; [102] Chapman refers to Maria Agreda as

“the celebrated ‘Blue Lady’ of the American Southwest”; [103] and Hodge

as editor of the translation of the Benavides Memorial gives a full

account of the story in his excellent notes. [104]

So far as I know, the identity of the Blue Lady has been accounted for

by no one except Benavides. What is the real basis of the story? Could

there actually have been a female missionary who labored in the wilds

of New Mexico and Texas before the coming of the Fathers? Or was there

some young priest whom zeal led into that romantic region ahead of the

most daring, and whom the natives mistook for a beautiful woman because

of his youthful face and priestly robes? I wish I could answer.

Legends of Texas · 第 120 / 232 题