CHAPTER XXVII. P. I.

A PASSAGE IN PROCOPIUS IMPROVED. A STORY CONCERNING URIM AND THUMMIM;

AND THE ELDER DANIEL'S OPINION OF THE PROFESSION OF THE LAW.

Here is Domine Picklock

My man of Law, sollicits all my causes,

Follows my business, makes and compounds my quarrels

Between my tenants and me; sows all my strifes

And reaps them too, troubles the country for me,

And vexes any neighbour that I please.

BEN JONSON.

Among the people who were converted to the Christian faith during the

sixth century were two tribes or nations called the Lazi and the Zani.

Methinks it had been better if they had been left unconverted; for

they have multiplied prodigiously among us, so that between the Lazy

Christians and the Zany ones, Christianity has grievously suffered.

It was one of the Zany tribe whom Guy once heard explaining to his

congregation what was meant by Urim and Thummim, and in technical

phrase _improving_ the text. Urim and Thummim, he said, were two

precious stones, or rather stones above all price, the Hebrew names of

which have been interpreted to signify Light and Perfection, or

Doctrine and Judgement, (which Luther prefers in his Bible, and in

which some of the northern versions, have followed him) or the Shining

and the Perfect, or Manifestation and Truth, the words in the original

being capable of any or all of these significations. They were set in

the High Priest's breast-plate of judgement; and when he consulted

them upon any special occasion to discover the will of God, they

displayed an extraordinary brilliancy if the matter which was referred

to this trial were pleasing to the Lord Jehovah, but they gave no

lustre if it were disapproved. “My Brethren,” said the Preacher, “this

is what learned Expositors, Jewish and Christian, tell me concerning

these two precious stones. The stones themselves are lost. But, my

Christian Brethren, we need them not, for we have a surer means of

consulting and discovering the will of God; and still it is by Urim

and Thummim if we alter only a single letter in one of those

mysterious words. Take your Bible, my brethren; _use him and thumb

him—use him and thumb him well_, and you will discover the will of God

as surely as ever the High Priest did by the stones in his breast

plate!”

What Daniel saw of the Lazi, and what he heard of the Zani, prevented

him from ever forming a wish to educate his son for a North country

cure, which would have been all the preferment that lay within his

view. And yet if any person to whose judgement he deferred had

reminded him that Bishop Latimer had risen from as humble an origin,

it might have awakened in him a feeling of ambition for the boy, not

inconsistent with his own philosophy.

But no suggestions could ever have induced Daniel to chuse for him the

profession of the Law. The very name of Lawyer was to him a word of

evil acceptation. Montaigne has a pleasant story of a little boy who

when his mother had lost a lawsuit which he had always heard her speak

of as a perpetual cause of trouble, ran up to him in great glee to

tell him of the loss as a matter for congratulation and joy; the poor

child thought it was like losing a cough, or any other bodily ailment.

Daniel entertained the same sort of opinion concerning all legal

proceedings. He knew that laws were necessary evils; but he thought

they were much greater evils than there was any necessity that they

should be; and believing this to be occasioned by those who were

engaged in the trade of administering them, he looked upon lawyers as

the greatest pests in the country—

Because, their end being merely avarice,

Winds up their wits to such a nimble strain

As helps to blind the Judge, not give him eyes.[1]

He had once been in the Courts at Lancaster, having been called upon

as witness in a civil suit, and the manner in which he was cross

examined there by one of those “young spruce Lawyers,” whom Donne has

so happily characterized as being

———“all impudence and tongue”

had confirmed him in this prejudice. What he saw of the proceedings

that day induced him to agree with Beaumont and Fletcher, that

Justice was a Cheese-monger, a mere cheese-monger,

Weighed nothing to the world but mites and maggots

And a main stink; Law, like a horse-courser,

Her rules and precepts hung with gauds and ribbands,

And pampered up to cozen him that bought her,

When she herself was hackney, lame and founder'd.[2]

His was too simple and sincere an understanding to admire in any other

sense than that of wondering at them

Men of that large profession that can speak

To every cause, and things mere contraries,

Till they are hoarse again, yet all be law!

That with most quick agility can turn

And re-return; can make knots and undo them,

Give forked counsel, take provoking gold

On either hand, and put it up. These men

He knew would thrive;—[3]

but far was he from wishing that a son of his should thrive by such a

perversion of his intellectual powers, and such a corruption of his

moral nature.

[Footnote 1: LORD BROOKE.]

[Footnote 2: WOMAN PLEASED.]

[Footnote 3: BEN JONSON.]

On the other hand he felt a degree of respect amounting almost to

reverence for the healing art, which is connected with so many

mysteries of art and nature. And therefore when an opportunity offered

of placing his son with a respectable practitioner, who he had every

reason for believing would behave toward him with careful and prudent

kindness, his entire approbation was given to the youth's own choice.

The doctor, &c., vol. 1 (of 7) · 第 27 / 32 章