C.

_Ampers &._ (Vol. ii., pp. 230. 284.; Vol. viii. _passim_).--MR. INGLEBY

may well ask what "and-per-se-and" can mean. The fact is, this is itself a

corruption. In old spelling-books, after the twenty-six letters it was

customary to print the two following symbols with their explanations

&c. et cetera.

& (per se), and.

Children were taught to read the above "et-cee, et cetera" and "et-per-se,

and." Such, at least, was the case in a Dublin school, some ninety years

ago, where my informant, now many years deceased, was educated. As _se_ was

not there pronounced like _cee_, but like _say_, there was no danger of

confounding the two names. In England, where a different pronunciation of

the Latin word prevailed, such confusion would be apt to occur; and hence,

probably, English teachers substituted _and_ for _et_; from which, in

course of time, the other corruptions mentioned by MR. LOWER were

developed.

Notes and Queries, Number 213, November 26, 1853 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 89 / 157 题